Last Updated:
01/18/2008 13:02
|
This page is a backup of the information on the origin page By Guy Cramer.
Please click
here for
original
Can we confirm, with some degree of certainty, the dates and chronology for two
separate prophecies that began 25 centuries ago, which have been fulfilled in
modern times?
See:
Ezekiel
Prophesied the 1967 Recapture of Jerusalem
The two start dates in Question are;
606 BC The Servitude of the Nation (Loss of Israel's independence).
Fulfilled on May 14,1948.
587 BC The Desolation's of Jerusalem (Destruction of Jerusalem and loss of
Jewish Rule in Jerusalem).
Fulfilled on June 7,1967.
I have seen numerous years mentioned for the loss of Israel's independence
ranging from 607-604, I have also seen different years 588-586 as the year of
destruction of Jerusalem by Babylon.
Since the topic can be quite confusing, I have added a color coded
Chronology Table
which can be referred to throughout the paper. All passages in the paper that
relate to one of the three dating methods will display the same color as that in
the table.
A solution to this controversy has always been to correlate the reign of
Jewish Kings of the time with that of Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar. Many
archaeological discoveries of the last 90 years have uncovered many Babylonian
texts that give precise times of astronomical data along with the year of the
King and the name of the King in the same document. Other chronicles from
Babylon that have been uncovered also give the year and name of the king and
events that happened at that time. The astronomical information gives us data
which we can translate into modern dating of the astronomical cycles to give us
an accurate time scale in which the events occurred. This data when correlated
answers a few contradictions in the Bible along with a few other mysteries.
A problem with getting the correct dates has been the technicality of how the
Biblical writer dates the ascension of Babylonian Kings:
In Babylonian chronicles, the year a King ascends
the throne is called accession year, the following year which would begin on the
New Year (1st Nisan) would be the first year and so on.
Jewish chronicles when explaining the year for the
Babylonian king's reign, follow a non-accession year system, and begins
counting the starting year as the first regnal year, the next which would begin
on the New Year (1st Nisan) as the second and so on.
Jewish chronicles in this time period when explaining a
Jewish king's reign, use the accession year as the first year the
following year which would begin on the New Year (1st Nisan) would be the first
year and so on.
According to a Babylonian tablet recently translated in 1956 the events dated
and calculated to be Nov/Dec 598 BC -Mar 16, 597 BC took place in
the seventh year of Nebuchadnezzar's reign. A Jewish
author would date this same period as Nebuchadnezzar's eighth
year in Israel's chronicles because they count the Accession year as the
first year. However, adding to the confusion, Jewish authors who were captive in
Babylon tend to date this same time period as the Babylonian Chronicles do:
the seventh year.
Astronomical data in Babylonian texts:
A Babylon text called the "saros" texts, or moon eclipse texts, contains
details of lunar eclipses. They can be assigned precisely to specific absolute
dates, because the precise observations are unique and cannot be repeated for
thousands of years. One of these saros texts documents precise data that can be
confirmed by computers that these lunar eclipses took place in 573/572 BC.
This saro text tells us that this took place in Nebuchadnezzar's 32nd year. The same text also documents that the lunar
eclipses of 591/590 took place in Nebuchadnezzar's 14th year.
A comprehensive Babylonian astronomical diary, VAT 4956, dated in
Nebuchadnezzar's 37th year, gives definite observations
that cannot fit any other year but 568 BC.
This astronomical data allows us to pinpoint the years in which events
happened.
Babylonian Chronicle
This clay tablet is a Babylonian chronicle recording events of
Nebuchadnezzar. It was first translated in 1956 and is now in the British
Museum. Part of the cuneiform text on this clay tablet translated:
...At that time Nebuchadnezzar conquered the whole of the Hatti-land. For 21
years Nabopolassar (Nebuchadnezzar's Father) had ruled Babylonia. On the eighth
of Ab he died; in the month of Elul Nebuchadnezzar returned to Babylon and on
the first day of Elul (= 6 September 605 BC) he sat on the royal throne in
Babylon.
Another section of the chronicle gives us the following details:
"In the seventh year (of Nebuchadnezzar) in the
month Chislev (Nov/Dec) the king of Babylon assembled his army, and after he had
invaded the land of Hatti (Syria/Palestine) he laid siege to the city of Judah.
On the second day of the month of Adara (Feb/Mar) he conquered the city and took
the king (Jehoiachin) prisoner. He installed in his place a king (Zedekiah) of
his own choice, and after he had received rich tribute, he sent (them) forth to
Babylon."
Taken with the astronomical data from the other Babylonian texts we can
confirm that the seventh year (using the Babylonian
Accession year method) of Nebuchadnezzar would give us the times as (Nov/Dec
598) and (Feb/Mar 597)
Do the Babylonian records confirm or contradict the Bible:
2 Kings 24:12; ...and the king of Babylon (Nebuchadnezzar)
In his eighth year of his reign, took him (Jehoiachin)
prisoner.
We see a discrepancy in years until we use the Babylonian Accession Year:
Babylonian Chronicles: 7th year + 1 Accession year =
8th year
2 Kings 24:12: Jewish non-accession year system
= 8th year
587 BC The Desolation's of Jerusalem (Loss of Jewish Rule in Jerusalem)
When both Jewish and Babylonian Chronologies are looked at we find an
apparent contradiction between 2 Kings 25:8 and Jeremiah 52:12 on
one side and Jeremiah 52:29 on the other hand. At the end of chapter
Jeremiah 51 in the original Hebrew Masoretic Text we find that this is the end
of Jeremiah's writings. The book of Jeremiah was obviously completed (last part
of chapter 52) by a Jew living in Babylon, who is likely to have used the
accession year system while Jeremiah who wrote Kings would use the Jewish system
to date Nebuchadnezzar's regnal year.
2 Kings 25:8; And in the fifth month, on the seventh day of the month
(which was the nineteenth year of King Nebuchadnezzar
king of Babylon)...
Jeremiah 52:12; Now in the fifth month, on the tenth day of the month
(which was the nineteenth year of King Nebuchadnezzar
king of Babylon)...
Jeremiah 52:29; In the eighteenth year of
Nebuchadnezzar he carried away captive from Jerusalem ...
2 Kings 25:8= Jewish non-accession year
system = 19th year
Jeremiah 52:12= Jewish non-accession year
system = 19th year
Jeremiah 52:29= 18th year + 1 Accession year =
19th year
Can we confirm that Jeremiah 52:29 was written by someone living in or
from Babylon using the Babylonian Accession Year system:
Only one verse before we see the same method used for dating the second siege
by Nebuchadnezzar;
Jeremiah 52:28; These are the people whom Nebuchadnezzar carried away
captive: In the seventh year, ...
We have already established from the Babylon Chronicle that this was in fact
the 8th year
Babylonian Chronicles: 7th year + 1 Accession year =
8th year
2 Kings 24:12: Jewish non-accession year system
= 8th year
Jeremiah 52:28: 7th year + 1 Accession year =
8th year
The Babylonian chronicles from the time of 593-556 have not been recovered or
have been lost. However, if we take the information from the earlier chronicle
events which coincides with the Biblical account we can determine the time of
the Desolation of Jerusalem from the other Biblical accounts. Two passages in
the Bible (2 Chronicles 36:11 and 2 Kings 24:18)
tells us that Zedekiah reigned 11 years. His 11 regnal year
can be dated between Mar/April 587 to Feb/Mar 586. Two other passages (Jeremiah
52:12 and 2 Kings 25:8) tell us the days (7th-10th) and month
(Av) in which this took place and also that it was in Nebuchadnezzar's 19 year according to the Jewish non-Accession method of
dating Babylonian kings. This would also coincide with Mar/April 587 to Feb/Mar
586. A fifth passage completed by a Jew living in Babylon (Jeremiah
52:29) using the Babylonian Accession system tells us that this is
Nebuchadnezzar's 18th year which also places the event
between Mar/April 587 to Feb/Mar 586. From all this information the time for the
Desolation of Jerusalem can be dated as the month of Av (July/Aug) 587.
No other year or month fits the chronology. This confirms the calculation for
the beginning of the prophecy for the Desolation of Jerusalem, which was
fulfilled on June 7,1967
606?
Jeremiah 46:2; Against Egypt. Concerning the army of Pharaoh Necho,
king of Egypt, which was by the river Euphrates in Carchemish, and which
Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon defeated in the fourth year
of Jehoiakim...
Daniel 1-2; In the third year of the reign of
Johoiakim king of Judah, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came to Jerusalem
and besieged it.
And the Lord gave Johoiakim king of Judah into his (Nebuchadnezzar's) hand...
Many scholars have long thought that these two incidents can be considered
together in time, but the chronologies don't fit this way. These (Daniel 1-2
and Jeremiah 46:2) are two separate incidents. The Babylonian Chronicles
make no mention of any attack on Jerusalem in Johoiakim's third year. The term
"and besieged it" might be translated as "and showed hostility to it" (the
Hebrew word can be translated either way). Johoiakim's third
year would have been between 1 Nisan (Mar/April 606) - Last day of Adar
(Feb/Mar 605). We know that Daniel was taken captive before the Battle of
Carchemish because he tells us that he was taken in Johoiakim's third year, the battle according to the Babylonian chronicles
coincided with Johoiakim's fourth year.
Contradiction?
Does Daniel when explaining the 2nd regnal year of Nebuchadnezzar in
Daniel 2:1 use the Jewish non-accession year system or
the Babylonian Accession system?
Daniel provides us with a calculation so we can solve the chronology
controversy in his text:
Daniel 1:5 ...and three years of training for them. so that at the
end of that time they might serve before the king.
Daniel 1:18
Now at the end of the days, when the king had said
that they should be brought in,...
Daniel 1:19 Then the king interviewed them and among them all none was
found like Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah; therefore they served
before the king.
Daniel 2:1 Now in the second year of Nebuchadnezzar's
reign, Nebuchadnezzar had dreams...
Daniel 2:25 Then Arioch quickly brought Daniel before the king, and said
thus to him, "I have found a man of the captives of Judah, who will make known
to the king the interpretation."
If Daniel in 2:1 used the Jewish non-accession system
it would not allow for the 3 full years of his training that took place between
his capture in the third year of Johoiakim and
the second year of Nebuchadnezzar. The only way that
Daniel works is if he used the Babylonian Accession year
system in Daniel 2:1. This would make sense as Daniel became prime
minister in Babylon and would have dated all events in Babylon with the
Babylonian Accession System. Daniel could not have made
a mistake between the third year of Johoiakim and the fourth
year of Johoiakim in Daniel 1:1. Using either method of dating the
second year of Nebuchadnezzar in Daniel 2:1 removes
Johoiakim's fourth year as an alternative for Daniel 1:1.
This information in Daniel tells us that the loss of independence of Israel
happened sometime before the battle of Charchemish which has long been thought
of as the date which Daniel makes reference to in Daniel 1:1. We actually
find that for the chronologies to fit, Daniel 1:1 happened between
Mar/April 606 and Feb/Mar 605. This is within the range that has been calculated
for this prophecy to begin (Summer of 606). However, with the data obtained to
date we cannot give a dogmatic answer on the month or even the season in Daniel 1:1.
The historic data that archeologist have uncovered in modern times about
Babylon confirms the separate accounts in the Bible of this time period. It also
comes about at a time when two prophecies of that time (which we can now date)
have been fulfilled in our generation.
Luke 21:7 So they (the disciples) asked him (Jesus), saying, "Teacher,
but when will these things be? And what sign will there be when these things are
about to take place?"
...
Luke 21:24 ...And Jerusalem will be trampled by Gentiles (nations) until
the times of the Gentiles (nations) are Fulfilled. [June 7,1967]
...
Luke 21:27 "Then they will see the Son of Man coming in a cloud with
power and great glory.
...
Luke 21:32 "Assuredly, I say to you, this generation will by no means
pass away till all these things take place.
©1997, Trinity Consulting, All Rights Reserved
For more papers on this and other related subjects;
Go
back to the Main Page (The Triunity Report)
Reference: "The Biblical World", Baker Book House Company, (1966) p.133-137
Presented by Trinity Consulting
