The Rapture, The Wedding Model
by Chuck Missler
Last Updated:
02/25/2009 02:14
|

See Also:
Lost In Translation: Rediscovering the Hebrew Roots to Our Faith
The Wedding Model
All through the Gospels, Jesus relied on the ancient Jewish wedding
pattern for many of His parables, climaxing in His promise in the Upper
Room in
John 14 (as reviewed in our previous article). Many of us miss
the full import of these allusions if we aren't familiar with the model
of ancient Jewish wedding practices.
Jewish Wedding
The first step, the Ketubah, or Betrothal, was the establishment of the
marriage covenant, usually when the prospective bridegroom took the
initiative and negotiated the price (mohair) he must pay to purchase
her.
Once the bridegroom paid the purchase price, the marriage covenant was
established, and the young man and woman were regarded as husband and
wife. From that moment on, the bride was declared to be consecrated or
sanctified - set apart - exclusively for her bridegroom. As a symbol of
the covenant relationship that had been established, the groom and bride
drank from a cup of wine over which the betrothal had been pronounced.
After the marriage covenant was established, the groom left his bride at
her home and returned to his father's house, where he remained separated
from his bride for approximately 12 months. This afforded the bride time
to gather her trousseau and prepare for married life.
During this period of separation, the groom prepared a dwelling place in
his father's house to which he would later bring his bride. At the end
of the period of separation, the bridegroom came - usually at night - to
take his bride to live with him. The groom, the best man, and other male
escorts left the father's house and conducted a torch-light procession
to the home of the bride. Although the bride was expecting her groom to
come for her, she did not know the time of his coming. As a result, the
groom's arrival was preceded by a shout, which announced her imminent
departure to be gathered with him.
After the groom received his bride, together with her female attendants,
the enlarged wedding party returned from the bride's home to the groom's
father's house, where the wedding guests had assembled.
Shortly after their arrival, the bride and groom were escorted by the
other members of the wedding party to the bridal chamber (chuppah). Prior
to entering the chamber, the bride remained veiled so that no one could
see her face. While the groomsmen and bridesmaids waited outside, the
bride and groom entered the bridal chamber alone. There, in the privacy
of that place, they entered into physical union for the first time,
thereby consummating the marriage that had been covenanted approximately
one year earlier.
After the marriage was consummated, the groom came out of the bridal
chamber and announced the consummation of the marriage to the members of
the wedding party waiting outside. Then, as the groom went back to his
bride in the chamber, the members of the wedding party returned to the
wedding guests and announced the consummation of the marriage.
Upon receiving the good news, the wedding guests remained in the groom's
father's house for the next seven days, celebrating with a great wedding
feast.
During the seven days of the wedding feast, the bride and groom remained
hidden in the bridal chamber (Cf.
Genesis 29:21-23, 27-28) for the seven
days of the chuppah. Afterwards, the groom came out of hiding, bringing
his bride with him, but with her veil removed so that everyone could see
her.
The Ultimate Bride
The New Testament portrays the Church as the Bride of Christ in
Ephesians 5:22-33 (Paul even quotes
Genesis 2:24 as the union at the Parousia of the Bridegroom in v.31!); cf.
Romans 7:4;
2 Corinthians
11:2;
James 4:4. In the opening verses of
John 14, the marriage covenant
is confirmed. Paul continually reminds us of the purchase price and the
covenant by which we, the Bride, are set apart, or sanctified.
Ecclesiology vs. Eschatology
It is this distinctive nature of the Church that is often overlooked by
students of prophecy: it is more a matter of ecclesiology than
eschatology.
One thing that seems to highlight this distinctiveness is the strange
remark Jesus made regarding John the Baptist:
Matthew 11:11 Verily I say unto you, Among them that are born of women there hath
not risen a greater than John the Baptist: notwithstanding he that is
least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.
What does that mean? Jesus goes on to explain,
Matthew 11:13 For all the prophets and the law prophesied until John.
It is John the Baptist that closes the Old Testament, not Malachi. A
profound distinction appears to be drawn between the saints of the Old
Testament and those of the New.
One of the challenges in fully appreciating Paul's epistles is the need
to understand the staggering and distinctive advantages afforded the
Church, in contrast to those of the Old Testament saints. And it is this
role as the Bride of the Bridegroom that is emphasized in the parables
and in the Book of Revelation.
The Departure of the Bridegroom
The Bridegroom has departed, and His return to gather His Bride is
imminent. He has gone to prepare a place for you and me. (He has been at
it for 2,000 years! It must be a spectacular abode!)
This very doctrine of "imminence" is taught throughout the New
Testament and is a cornerstone of the "pre-tribulational"
view: there is no event which is a prerequisite condition for His
gathering of His Bride.
The Great Tribulation
There are those who believe the Church will go through the Great
Tribulation. In exploring this issue, it is essential to distinguish
between persecution, which clearly has been the lot of the Church for 19
centuries, and "the Great Tribulation" of eschatological
significance. The persecution - and tribulation - of the Church was
clearly promised to us:
John 16:33 These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace.
In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have
overcome the world.
The source of this tribulation is the world and, of course, Satan.
However, "the Great Tribulation" of eschatological
significance is quite another matter.
Matthew 24:21 For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the
beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.
The context here is clearly Israel. Jesus is quoting from the Old
Testament:
Daniel 12:1 And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth
for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble,
such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and
at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be
found written in the book.
Note that "thy people will be delivered": the focus of the
"Great Tribulation" is Israel. That is why it is called
"the time of Jacob's Trouble":
Jeremiah 30:7 Alas! for that day is great, so that none is like it: it is even the
time of Jacob's trouble; but he shall be saved out of it.
Jesus (in the Old Testament) explains:
Hosea 5:15 I will go and return to my place, till they acknowledge their offence,
and seek my face: in their affliction they will seek me earnestly.
To "return," He must have left His place! The offence referred
to is singular and specific: their rejection of Him. In "their
affliction" they will ultimately repent and He will respond.
The Great Tribulation also involves more than the wrath of the world or
the wrath of Satan: it involves the indignation and wrath of God. In
contrast, the Church has been promised:
1 Thessalonians 5:9 For God hath not appointed us to wrath, but to obtain salvation by our
Lord Jesus Christ,
And,
Romans 5:9 Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved
from wrath through him.
And, specifically,
Revelation 3:10 Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee
from the hour [time] of temptation [trial], which shall come upon all
the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth.
Peter also emphasizes,
2 Peter 2:9 The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of temptations, and to
reserve the unjust unto the day of judgment to be punished:
Here, Peter is using the judgment upon Sodom and Gomorrah "as an
example," as Jesus also did, in which the prior removal of Lot was
a precondition before the angels could do their work.
A complete study of this issue involves careful and diligent study of
both the Church (ecclesiology) as well as the eschatology (end time
aspects) of the Great Tribulation, which, of course, far exceeds the
focus of this brief review. It requires precise definitions of the terms
used, and great care to understand how each of the elements of the
revealed truth relate to each other.
But the fundamental doctrine of imminence has to be forfeited with any
view that requires the Great Tribulation - or any other precedent event
- to occur prior to the harpazo.
Luke 21:36 Watch ye therefore, and pray always, that ye may be accounted worthy to
escape all these things that shall come to pass, and to stand before the
Son of man.
Are you going to escape these things that shall come to pass? If so,
how? Or are you relying on the notion that the Lord is "delaying
His coming?" This could be a very dangerous presumption. Do your
homework. It is important.
Related Topics:
|