This page is not for those who want to never hear the facts or
face hard reality. The information on this page is uncomfortable, unsettling and will
probably anger and/or offend some. My intention here is to share information
I've learned of over time in studying many diverse subjects. There
are things that you are going to wish not to be true. I don't have
full knowledge and none of us do, but we have a trail of evidence
leading to the ultimate end laid out in Bible prophecy. Whether you
believe the Bible or not, this page is focused on America and events
related to her.
While America isn't explicitly in Bible prophecy, it is here now. But this means one of two things. Either America is so badly attacked that
from the other side of the world she has no power to do anything in the area
prophecy is discussing. Or America becomes part of
the beast'sNew World Order and is no longer identified as
a separate nation within the global governance control structure. It seems to
me that America is heading down this path now, becoming part of the
global community and with deceptive issues such as
global warming, the world is subtly being brought to a place of
thinking as a global community. This will lead to a desire to be run
globally, for the good of the planet of course.
America is already being
destroyed financially. The process of integrating her into the one-world
government system is well under way. It has been Bush's expressed goal as well
as many other Presidents before. The blame falls not on Democrat or
Republican, but men of power without understanding leading us straight to
where Bible prophecy places us, gone or part of the system. The ultimate destination of this plan will
end with America no longer existing as a sovereign nation, but most likely part of the
world government, controlled by the powerful few, and ultimately the man of
sin.
The
L.O.S.T. treaty among other things are showing signs of a coming
loss of
national sovereignty from foreign laws and with the current fear
of terrorism globally, there's yet another reason that nations must
work together to supposedly bring about peace and security.
Examples The bottom line is that America isn't clearly present in
Bible prophecy, and judging from the power the beast will have over the
nations of the world, it's because we aren't a world power anymore, for one
reason or the other.
I've always loved America because of the freedoms and the
Christian foundation I was allowed to have unlike some other more
restrictive places on earth. But all good things come to an end in this dark
world and as sad as I am to see it happening, I know also that our
redemption draws nigh. In reading this page, guard your mind, yet be open to
the possibility that absolute power corrupts absolutely and in this age of
self focus, all politicians are in a key place to be bought or flattered.
This will ultimately lead to all power being given to one man and that is
the point of sharing this information. The prophesied end cannot be changed,
but God has not left us in darkness regarding what is coming so remember how
close we could be to the end as you watch the news and how easily America
can and will fall into the hands of Lucifer...if it isn't already. This is
way beyond politics because no matter who wins, the end will be the same.
Don't get drawn into party lines, be aware that there is no line, the goal
is the same even if they don't know it.
Examining America's beginnings in the eyes of the secret
societies opens up a whole new world of secret agendas that
eventually took over America because of the nature of secret
societies and their dark deeds done out of the light of public
opinion. I recommend getting the following
DVDs to gain this
insight. Purchase
here.
Secret Mysteries of America's Beginnings
Volume One - The New Atlantis
Secret Mysteries of Americas Beginnings unfolds the fascinating history
behind the founding of America, and exposes the esoteric underbelly of its
design. Why is Washington D.C. built on the 77th Meridian? And are the
Revolutionary War cities really built in perfect alignment with Stonehenge? Follow the journey of secret societies from England to the New World and
learn of their ancient hope of establishing a democratic commonwealth that
would one day extend to all nations.
In the 16th century,
Sir Francis Bacon was at the helm of such societies
as the leader of the Rosicrucians and first Grand Master of modern
Freemasonry. As such, he is considered by some to be the true founder of
America. For centuries, controversy has surrounded this man who is said to be the
illegitimate son of Queen Elizabeth I and the real author behind the
Shakespeare plays.
When Bacon penned his classic work, The New Atlantis, he outlined his vision
for the perfect society; a democratic commonwealth governed by scientific
achievement. How were the founding fathers impacted by Bacon's plan? And is
America being driven by this vision today? Where The DaVinci Code meets National Treasure. Learn the incredible
secrets of the esoteric traditions, hidden within the manifold layers of
signs and symbols in our nation's infrastructure; symbols that for many
represent the secret destiny of the world's greatest nation.
Running Time: 3 hour historical documentary
Secret Mysteries of America’s
Beginnings Volume Two - Riddles In Stone: Secret Architecture of Washington, D.C.
This documentary explores the highly controversial subject
of the design of America's capital. Was the city built to reflect the
majesty of America's newfound freedom? Or the hidden agenda of secret
societies? With every major cornerstone laid by Freemasons, was the city
built in a Masonic pattern?
Embark upon this incredible journey as Riddles in Stone interviews experts
on both sides of the heated debate. Watch as Freemason apologists defend
some of the most direct and hard-hitting questions concerning the influence
of Masonry in America, and its symbolism in Washington, D.C. Alongside them
are leading researchers who maintain that occult architecture permeates the
city, and conceals a secret agenda.
Was D.C. laid out according to the pattern of the stars? Is there really a
pentagram in the street layout north of the White House? Does a Masonic
square and compass extend from the Capitol building to the Washington
monument? And why is the city filled with zodiac symbols, mysterious faces,
and various god and goddess images? If America was founded as a Christian
nation only, where are the Christian images? Or does Washington D.C.
symbolize another Christ, the Masonic Christ? Find out, in this bold and sure-to-be controversial documentary.
Running Time: 3 hour historical documentary
Wall Builders -
David Barton has thousands of documents (even personal letters) that
prove most of the founding fathers of America had a dependent
relationship with Jesus. They had several hours of prayer on their
knees before drafting the Constitution. Post by
FreeInHim at
FulfilledProphecy: "This myth regarding the religious
inclinations of the founding fathers, the 55 delegates who
participated in the four-month long Constitutional convention, was
started back in ‘95, by a professor of physics at L.A. Harbor
College named Steven Morris. He wrote an op-ed piece in the L.A.
Times entitled, “America’s Unchristian Beginnings.” The subtitle
read, “Founding Fathers: Despite preaching of our pious Right, most
were deists who rejected the divinity of Jesus.” It should be of
particular interest to any reader of this opinion piece that Steven
Morris is also a member of the L.A.-based Atheists United. It’s also
interesting to note that Mr. Morris chose the word “most” to portray
the number of founding fathers who were allegedly deists. A close
scrutiny of the writings of these men, both public and personal,
refutes that claim. To substantiate his claims, Morris lifted quotes
from various selected writings of a few of the founding fathers. As
you well know from studying the Bible, one can’t isolate a single
passage and expect to understand the message intended. One needs to
look at the entire column of scripture, at least, to get the gist of
the message. For example, concerning John Adams, Morris claimed,
“Late in life, he wrote “Twenty times in the course of my late
reading have I been upon the point of breaking out, “This would be
the best of all possible worlds if there were no religion in it!!!”
It’s true this statement did appear in a letter Adams wrote to
Thomas Jefferson in 1817, in which Adams recounted a conversation
between Joseph Cleverly and Lemuel Bryant; a schoolmaster and a
minister he had known. Fed up with the petty religious bickering
that went on between the two, Adams declared to Jefferson (now
please read carefully): Twenty times in the course of my late
reading have I been upon the point of breaking out, “This would be
the best of all possible worlds if there were no religion in it!!!”
But in this exclamation I would have been as fanatical as Bryant or
Cleverly. Without religion this world would be something not fit to
be mentioned in polite company, I mean hell. BTW, the following
month Jefferson wrote back and said he agreed! The revisionist
effort is self-evident and should be of no surprise. Deliberately
coloring the Christian beliefs of our founding fathers a darker hue,
or painting over them altogether, is a tact any atheist worth his
salt would attempt. To me, the really disturbing aspect of this ploy
isn’t the action of the atheist, but the willingness of good
Christians to swallow this diet of fraud without so much as a taste
test."
The Separation of Church and State
Wall Builders -
I just came across this article and wanted to share it with you all
in light of many attacks on Christianity in education and elsewhere.
Check out
Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed and some
current legal cases
resulting from the creation/evolution debate often evoking the
supposed "separation of church and state" issue to eliminate
religious discussion in education and even in public.
The following I received from
NumbersUSA by e-mail
about the video they have now posted online. I believe this shows how the
America we know will not be as it was and this presentation shows us how. I
also believe this is part of the plan of the
New
World Order, along with many other designs, to remove America's power and
create a population more inclined to join the global community. It also
creates a fear of terrorism because of technology and desire of terrorists to
destroy America is real. Part of Lucifer's plan is to create the need for a
uniting leader capable of providing peace and security. The people have to
want peace and security first though. I highly recommend you watch the video
keeping the push for globalism in mind.
The video is especially important right now
because it shows why the annual immigration numbers count. Almost nobody in
the Senate or in the media right now wants to focus at all on the net
numbers involved in the Senate immigration bill. This video is a powerful
reminder that immigration policy, set by Congress, is fundamentally about
numbers.
It is worth noting that this video was produced in 1997. At the time, it was
based on the Census Bureau's projection of where both legal and illegal
immigration would lead the country. Since then, legal immigration has risen
so much that the population growth on the video covers little more than just
legal immigration and represents what would happen AFTER we virtually end
illegal immigration. Thus, the point is even more salient that we not only
have to end illegal immigration but we must substantially reduce legal – the
exact opposite of what the Senate immigration bill that would give out 35
million green cards in the next 20 years alone would do!
Why is this issue being
allowed to happen? Here is a short video regarding the North American Union. I
believe this is all steps to bring about a
New
World Order and a one-world government that will eventually be headed by
the antichrist. As for North America, plans are in the works to effectively
eliminate the borders over time, which will negatively impact American
sovereignty as our laws begin to be dictated to us from outside our nation.
This is all part of the plan for global governance. Visit here for a
Timeline of the Progress Toward A North American Union.
0:04:17
As you
read the following, ponder where our nation is at in each of these
points and how we have gotten to where we are today.
Communist Manifesto 1846
Abolition of private property
(How many Americans actually
own their land? How many could lose it to the government if
they didn't pay taxes? Is it really our land?)
Confiscation of property of rebels
(State seizing property of
"hate groups." With the
Alliance of Civilizations, "hate groups" are those
claiming sole ownership to the Truth, Bible-believing
Christians, Jews and fundamentalist Muslims.
See where this is going.)
Government ownership of communication and transportation
(What will happen in a state of
emergency because of "terrorism," revolt, or natural
disasters?)
Government ownership of factories and agriculture
(We've outsourced all that
for the love of money and the destruction of America.)
Government control of labor
Corporate farms, regional planning
Government control of education
(Look at our public school
system today, watch
Kent Hovind's presentations of how the theory of
Evolution taught as fact is destroying faith in God and His
Word.)
North American Union -
Audio/Video slideshow presenting the facts about the NAU.
Timeline of the Progress Toward a North American Union -
Canadian, U.S., and Mexican elites, including CEOS and politicians,
have a plan to create common North American policies and further
integrate our economies. This plan goes by various names and
euphemisms, such as "deep integration", "NAFTA-plus",
"harmonization", the "Big Idea", the "Grand Bargain", and the "North
American Security and Prosperity Initiative". Regardless of which
name your prefer, the end goal of all of these plans is to create a
new political and economic entity that would supercede the existing
countries. Advocates refer to it as a "North American Community",
but it is also known as the North American Union (NAU).
Theoretically, it would be similar to and competetive with the
European Union (EU). The individual currencies of each country would
be replaced by a common currency called the "Amero" and everything
from environmental regulations to security would be brought in line
with a common standard.
Working Groups - Nameless bureaucrats meeting behind
closed doors in a multinational setting, where they are writing laws
to integrate and harmonize laws. 20 of these were created following
the Security & Prosperity Partnership (SPP) meeting March 23, 2005
to harmonize America's laws with Mexico and Canada.
-
This site has some good information on the U.N./international laws that will
soon affect the United States if the globalists accomplish their plans.
Understanding Bible prophecy and
where we are in God's plans, I believe they will accomplish
their goal very soon.
Jesuit Fascism and their takeover of America and Alternative Media (Thomas
Richards)
PRESIDENTIAL POWERS IN TIMES OF EMERGENCY: Could
Terrorism Result In A Constitutional Dictator?
Writ FindLaw
(June 7, 2002)
- At present, the President has opted to
exercise only a few of his emergency powers. Under the National
Emergencies Act, at this time, he is only utilizing provisions
relating to the military. Will the President choose to use
additional powers? It depends on the future. Because we don't know
what shape this undeclared war on terrorism will take, we can't know
what powers this president - or any successor - might need to cope
with the problems of terrorism. An American President, should he
need them, possesses awesome powers. Those powers potentially
include what political scientists have described as the powers of a
"constitutional dictatorship." No President has ever had to go that
far - although they have come close. Now, however, it is not
difficult to conceive of scenarios where terrorist groups, hell-bent
on our destruction and refusing to abide by any known rules of war,
could employ weapons of mass destruction or bio-terrorism in a
manner that could threaten our existence as a nation. What happens
then?
Democracy In Crisis: Will It Transform Into
Another Form of Government?
Democracy works best in times of peace, when there
is debate, compromise, and deliberation in forming governing rules,
regulations, and policies. When confronted with a major crisis -
particularly one that is, like terrorism, of an unfamiliar nature -
the nation will turn to the President for initiative and resolute
leadership. If our very existence and way of life are threatened,
Americans will want their President to do whatever is necessary. The
history of democratic governments, from the ancient republics of
Greece and Rome to the modern states that have replaced earlier
totalitarian governments, show that governing by committees, or
legislative bodies, never works in times of crisis. Fortunately, our
Founders were aware of this when they designed our system. Alexander
Hamilton explained in Federalist No. 70 that the essential nature of
the chief executive is his "energy," which "is a leading [element]
in the definition of good government. It is essential to the
protection of the community against foreign attacks; it is no less
essential to the steady administration of the laws; to the
protection of property against those irregular and high-handed
combinations, which sometimes interrupt the ordinary course of
justice; to the security of liberty against the enterprises and
assaults of ambition, of faction, and of anarchy." While our
constitution contains no express provision for "emergency" or
"crisis" situations, such a provision is not necessary. The U.S.
Supreme Court made clear in Ex Parte Milligan,
following the Civil War, that "the government, within the
Constitution, has all the powers granted to it which are necessary
to preserve its existence." Or as one commentator has added,
"self-preservation is the first law of any nation."
Past presidents - principally Abraham Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, and
Franklin Roosevelt - by exercising their powers in time of
emergency, have expanded their authority as necessary to meet
emergencies they faced. They have, in essence, made the law in times
of crisis, not always in the manner envisioned. Lincoln launched the
Civil War unilaterally, without Congressional action, following the
secession of seven Southern states. Only later did he obtain
Congressional approval. His critics called him a dictator. But he
got the job done that had to be done. Wilson asked for and received
near dictatorial powers from Congress when attacks by Germany
against American ships and submarines plunged the nation into World
War I. He had to raise and equip a large army to fight on foreign
soil. To do so, he demanded and received unprecedented new power and
authority. When Franklin Roosevelt was inaugurated in 1933, the
world-wide Great Depression had reached its depths. The new
President promised action, and during his first 100 days, Congress
gave him what he needed to enable him to use federal powers to rout
the Depression and rescue every sector of the economy, as well as
state and local government, from economic ruin. Later, following the
1941 attack on Pearl Harbor, which forced the United States into
World War II, FDR's exertion of his presidential powers would far
exceed anything Wilson or Lincoln had done. Through the strength of
his personality, Roosevelt lead the nation from that day of "infamy"
through battles in Europe, Africa, Asia and the Pacific to total
victory. While FDR continued to ask Congress for what he needed, he
gave them no choice as to whether they would accede. For example, in
demanding that Congress repeal provisions in the Price Control Act
(prohibiting ceilings on certain food products), he told the
Congress: "In the event the Congress should fail to act, and act
adequately, I shall accept the responsibility, and I will act." And
he reminded the Congress: "The President has the power ... to take
measures necessary to avert a disaster which would interfere with
winning of the war." We've been blessed with strong presidents in
times of national crisis. They were men who demonstrated a capacity
for leadership, and men who acted undemocratically, but only to
preserve our democracy. We've been fortunate, for the distinction
between a "constitutional dictator" and a strong president is
remarkably thin, if not non-existent. As Writ columnist
Michael Dorf has noted, there are few checks on our Commander in
Chief.
Constitutional Dictatorships: What Happens to
Democracies in Emergencies
Rossiter looked at the phenomenon of
constitutional dictatorships in the aftermath of World War II, for
he was concerned that "more rather than fewer periods of crisis" lay
ahead. In Constitutional Dictatorship, he examines the
experiences of crisis governments ranging from the ancient
constitutional state of Rome to four modern states (Germany, France,
Great Britain, and the United States), focusing on four major crises
in the United States: the Civil War, the two World Wars, and the
Great Depression. Professor Albert Sturm, a student of Rossiter's
work, has also written of constitutional dictatorships. In a 1949
essay "Emergencies and the Presidency" in the Journal of Politics,
for example, Sturm found that these "temporary concentrations of
power in an executive" for meeting emergencies, which have been
"employed by vigorous democracies since ancient times," are
necessary for "the preservation of the established system in the
face of temporary crisis." Typically, such authority lasts only as
long as the crisis, Sturm notes, and it is sanctioned by the
"existing constitutional system."
Constitutional Dictatorship: Could It Happen
Here?
Of course, the very concept of a "dictatorship" is
offensive and inimical to our political thinking as citizens of a
democracy. And Rossiter acknowledges that no American government has
ever been a true constitutional dictatorship, as that concept is
understood by students of government. Rather, he uses the term, in
the American context, as "convenient hyperbole" - an exaggeration
meant to underscore how many, and how extensive, have been the
powers American presidents have necessarily arrogated to themselves
in wartime. Nevertheless, Rossiter, and other students of
constitutional dictatorships, do not rule out the idea that one
could ever exist in America. Indeed, they raised questions in the
aftermath of World War II that are still relevant today as we find
ourselves in an undeclared war, and the first stages of emergency
government. Recall that FDR took the nation from a "limited"
national emergency on September 8, 1939, to an "unlimited" emergency
by May 27, 1941, and then to total war by December 7, 1941. Anyone
who does not believe the war on terrorism will escalate, as well, is
in denial. Rossiter does not address the question of whether
Americans could tolerate the undemocratic ways of a constitutional
dictatorship. Instead, he is interested in the question of whether
we could survive the alternative. He asks, that is, if we could
"afford not to resort to undemocratic methods when such methods are
essential to the preservation of the state?" To raise the question
suggests the answer.
Terrorism Could Indeed Result In A
Constitutional Dictatorship
"Constitutional dictatorship is a dangerous
thing," Rossiter advises. Such governments are the result of
necessity, of the sheer imperative of survival. The greatest danger
with such a form of government, and its related institutions and
laws, is that they can remain after the crisis has abated. These are
not decisions that should be made by the President and Congress each
time the crisis escalates; rather, we should think about them
carefully in advance in order to make prudent decisions later. One
need only look at the haste and thoughtlessness with which we have
adopted the potentially dangerous USA PATRIOT Act, most of which
Republicans and Democrats alike had earlier rejected, to understand
why legislating in the aftershock of terrorism should be avoided if
possible. Our present emergency laws and regulations are a
hodgepodge, a patchwork quilt. They respond to precedents from past
great crises, and that is wise, but unfortunately these precedents
do not contemplate a protracted war on terrorism, or an enemy unlike
any we have ever confronted. Congress has the power to determine
whether it wants the American equivalent of a constitutional
dictator in the White House. The only way to be certain that we
don't make that decision during a crisis, is to revise and codify
our emergency laws now - before fear and anger in the aftermath of a
possible attack might cause us to make bad decisions, and too easily
trade liberty for security in numerous areas. As I write this
column, President Bush has announced that he will address the nation
about his plans for restructuring the government for fighting the
war on terrorism. None of Professor Rossiter's observations about
our history is more chilling than his finding that each national
crisis has left the nation a little less democratic than before.
With the President's announcement, it is not too soon to consider
whether, in fighting terrorism, we really want a constitutional
dictator to lead us. I certainly don't, nor do I know anyone who
does, but if a future attack comes, and is devastating, the pressure
to resort to constitutional dictatorship may be irresistible.
Revelation 13:3-10 And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death;
and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered
after the beast. And they worshipped the dragon which gave
power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who
is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him? And
there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and
blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and
two months. And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to
blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in
heaven. And it was given unto him to make war with the
saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all
kindreds, and tongues, and nations. And all that dwell
upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in
the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the
world. If any man have an ear, let him hear. He that leadeth
into captivity shall go into captivity: he that killeth with the
sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and
the faith of the saints.
0:37:48
International law
is not law but politics. For that reason, it is dangerous to
give the name “law,” which summons up respect, to political
struggles that are essentially lawless. The problem is not
merely the anti-Americanism that grips foreign elites and shapes
law; it is also the American intellectual class, which is
largely hostile to the United States and uses international law
to attack the morality of its own government and society.
To foreign elites and
our “intellectual class”, American sovereignty is passé: a concept
that has outlived its time that should be limited at every
opportunity by international “law” in the form of treaties and
decisions of the Security Council and UN-created courts. American
sovereignty is based on our Constitution. There is no provision in
the Constitution for US law to be made by the UN or any of the
“courts” it creates. George W. Bush may go down in the history books
incorrectly as a “unilateralist” president for taking action in
Iraq, but his legacy -- most of which is still undecided -- may be
just the opposite. more... |
EU/UN
/4th Kingdom
|NewWorldOrder |
America|
I've been putting off presenting this
information I've learned because it disturbs me greatly and I'm very
wary of the group vehemently dividing our nation, but I can't
explain away what I've learned. If we are truly as near to the end
as the
HIStory, Our Future Bible studies seem to point, then
this makes perfect sense and fits into that timeline. I would
recommend that study first as a foundation to what this gets into.
If you would rather not know anything that will destroy your current
perception, do not visit the link. If you do, read and watch
everything before deciding anything. Honestly examine what is
presented as it is presented and remember
Romans 12:19-21.
In my hesitancy, I've called it
Beating around the Bush's Please remember that Yeshua told us
to watch and share the Gospel, not get involved in politics of the
world. We cannot change what is about to unfold as it was foretold
in scripture to glorify God. Our escape is through Yeshua Ha
Mashiach, Jesus the Messiah. So rather than be ruled by anger and
vengeance, share His selfless love and let God do the avenging for
the wickedness of the world. We are not of this world but we are the
salt and light of it.
Proverbs 18:13 He
that answers a matter before he hears it, it is folly and shame unto him.
Outrage Erupts Over Bush Demands in Murder Case
WorldNet Daily
(October 10, 2007) -
What the U.S. government
wants in the Medellin murder case, now being heard before the U.S.
Supreme Court, is "bizarrely grotesque," according to the chief counsel
for the
Alliance Defense Fund. And
the warning from ADF Chief Counsel
Benjamin Bull notes that the case, being pursued by President Bush
through the Department of Justice, could result in U.S. laws being
subjugated to U.N. resolutions and rules to the point that local police
officers will have to spend more time studying international law than
catching criminals. "The notion that an international body can Mirandize
the right of an illegal immigrant to call a consulate, so that if the
local police trip up and innocently don't to it, a convicted
rapist-torturer-murderer goes free, goes beyond bizarrely grotesque,"
Bull, whose organization has filed an amicus brief on the issue, told
WND. At issue is the death penalty verdict for Jose Medellin, who
confessed in 1993 to participating in the rape and murder of two Houston
teenagers. Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena were sodomized and
strangled with their shoe laces. Medellin then boasted of keeping one
girl's Mickey Mouse watch as a souvenir of the crime. The Bush
administration is before the U.S. Supreme Court seeking to overturn the
death penalty, at the behest of the International Court of Justice, a
division of the United Nations. Medellin and four others were
convicted of capital murder and sent to Texas' death row. A juvenile
court sentenced Medellin's younger brother, who was 14 at the time, to
40 years in prison. But the Bush administration intervention came after
the U.N.'s International Court of Justice found Medellin was not
informed of his right to contact the Mexican Consulate for legal
assistance. That, according to the Hague, was a violation of a 1963
treaty known as the Vienna Convention. more...
|
EU/UN
/4th Kingdom| NewWorldOrder |America|
In two words, "global
governance." And the world will give their power to the beast
because none can make war with him. They have slowly given all their
rights and freedoms over to a man who comes in with flattery to
deceive and take the freedom of others to later exert his control on
them through changing the laws and the times.
Daniel 7:25 And he shall speak great words against the most High,
and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to
change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand
until a time and times and the dividing of time.
Which brings me to an update,
the
Treaty of Lisbon. This is the beginning of the coming legal war
on the saints. How much control does Europe apparently already have?
And what will happen when America's economy collapses and Europe has
to bail us out financially, will there be any option but obedience
or fighting, but they're expecting and prepared for both. That is
why we must pray and forgive, loving our enemies for vengeance is
the Lord's, He will repay justly.
Euro Could Replace U.S. Dollar As Favored Reserve Currency
Associated
Press (September 17, 2007) - Former
U.S. Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan said it is possible that
the euro could replace the U.S. dollar as the reserve currency of
choice. According to an advance copy of an interview to be published in
Thursday's edition of the German magazine Stern, Greenspan said that the
dollar is still slightly ahead in its use as a reserve currency, but
added that "it doesn't have all that much of an advantage" anymore. The
euro has been soaring against the U.S. currency in recent weeks, hitting
all-time high of $1.3927 last week as the dollar has fallen on turbulent
market conditions stemming from the ongoing U.S. subprime crisis. The
Fed meets this week and is expected to lower its benchmark interest rate
from the current 5.25 percent. Greenspan said that at the end of 2006,
some 25 percent of all currency reserves held by central banks were held
in euros, compared to 66 percent for the U.S. dollar. In terms of being
used as a payment for cross-border transactions, the euro is trailing
the dollar only slightly with 39 percent to 43 percent. Greenspan said
the European Central Bank has become "a serious factor in the global
economy." He said the increased usage of the euro as a reserve currency
has led to a lowering of interest rates in the euro zone, which has
"without any doubt contributed to the current economic growth."
|
EU/UN
/4th Kingdom| NewWorldOrder |
America|
Breaking News: Looks like Solana's NGO cheering
section in the form of Worldwatch Institute is getting in on his
power boosting act. Read about that here.
It has now called for the EU to pressure the USA on climate change.
Maybe we should have Lester Brown and his World Watch Institute
register as the foreign agents they evidently are!
A frightening headline on a
Fox news
story ran yesterday. It indicated:
1. Germany's Angela Merkel
says they will no longer support
increased sanctions against Iran on the nuclear development
issue.
2. Assumption in Washington is that this means they won't care if
USA does something unilaterally to take that threat out.
3. Germany's economic relationship with Iran makes it unfeasible for
them to support sanctions against that oil rich country.
Now, the reality, probabilities, and prophetic
implications:
1. Germany's
Angela Merkel could not be more closely allied with the EU's foreign
and military policy chief, Javier Solana.
2.
Europe is already bitter at the USA for the 2003 Iraq invasion.
Also click here for more
documentation.
3. European Union countries have been
handing Solana the immense powers
they have to EQUALIZE
themselves with the USA.
4. A prophesied God given role of whoever the prophesied "10 kings"
handed their power to was to equalize themselves with another power
"and thus fulfill the words of this prophecy." See Rev. 17.
5. If Germany can't afford to antagonize Iran with sanctions, how
much less can it afford to antagonize Iran by tacitly sanctioning
war?
6. Germany's agenda during its recently closed EU presidency was to
boost Javier Solana's powers --
it made tremendous progress on crafting a treaty that would give him
the powers he sought in the constitution. It has placed (with
the help of EU allies inside England) Solana in a much stronger
position than he was prior to that German presidency.
7. Javier Solana's Brookings Institution speech of March 21, 2007
said that
global disarmament and non-proliferation were "imperative" to him.
He also said it was "imperative" that the
new global governance machinery be ready by 2009.
8. This new public hint that the USA is considering imprudent
bombing operations against Iran might be exactly what Javier Solana
needs to give European countries "the crisis that equals
opportunity" rationale to put him over the top with the powers he
needs
to consolidate
the 2 million scattered separate European country
armies, their navies, their weaponry, etc.
valued at over $200 billion USD
per EU sources.
9. The NATO weaponry is sitting in Europe with
more
European control than USA control, thanks in no small part to
Javier Solana's splitting of the commands between Brussels and
Norfolk during his NATO tenure between 1995 and 1999.
10. There are clear Biblical prophecies about a great Babylon being
destroyed by fire and the ships at sea bewailing her burning? Could
that be the USA the prophets were seeing? "In one hour is thy
destruction come?"
11. The threat of the USA bombing a necessary oil and economic
resource for European countries such as Iran could very well give
credence to the increasing demands that
"Europe speak with one voice."
12. Very clearly, Javier Solana is and has been the "face and voice
of Europe."
13. Never forget
what
created Javier Solana's job and what
he proposed to increase his powers.
I am writing this in shock and on the fly. I must go
to my office for an appointment. I will add hyperlinks to this story and
amplify it later. We indeed live in serious times and I fear for my
country. Stay tuned!
|
EU/UN
/4th Kingdom
|
Solana
|
NewWorldOrder |
America|
I highlighted in red the date
that Javier Solana believes it imperative to have the global
governance machinery in place by, 2009, because of the conclusions
arrived at in the
HIStory, Our Future Bible studies placing the abomination
of desolation in February of 2009! This was discovered thanks to the
diligent research of those noted in the study before I got the
confirming evidence of Herb L. Peter's research. Before then, I
didn't know much about European politics or how much it is
fulfilling Bible prophecy. This is just another confirming piece to
the puzzle. Remember that God has not left those watching in
darkness that we should be caught like a thief! His Word is being
fulfilled today!
Will Lady Liberty Last Beyond 2010? News
With Views (August 31, 2007)
- Free republics are not known to have long life
expectancies. At the ripe old age of two hundred and thirty-one,
America is definitely showing her age. She is long past her prime,
and some are predicting her demise. No, some are PLANNING her
demise. Thomas Jefferson and the other founders of this once-great
country believed there was a controlling cabal that was crafting
America's servitude. With the assistance of Heaven, they decided to
fight those forces. Pastors fought with fiery sermons from the
pulpit; newsmen fought with the power of the pen; statesmen fought
in the halls of congress; and merchants fought with the sacrifice of
their material gain. Together, they lifted Lady Liberty to her feet
and defeated the powers of darkness. It took the global elite a long
time to recover, but they have reemerged with a vengeance. They are
now on the precipice of accomplishing what their great granddaddies
failed to do: bring the rebellious colonists under their power and
control. You see, we no longer have the will to resist servitude.
Our pulpits are too busy preaching a prosperity gospel; newsmen are
in bed with the forces they once disdained; statesmen have been
replaced with opportunistic, self-serving politicians; and merchants
know no god but money. Hence, it is left to a small--and I mean very
small--remnant to sound the clarion call for freedom and
independence. Unfortunately, few seem to be listening to their
cries. 2010 seems to be a banner year for these designers of
despotism. That is the target year for the implementation of the
North American Community, which will unite the United States with
Canada and Mexico. The global elite suffered a minor set-back when
the U.S. Senate failed to pass the Bush/McCain/Kennedy/Graham
amnesty-for-illegal-aliens bill. But if you think that George W.
Bush is going to let that bill lie on the floor of defeat, you don't
understand these people. President Bush will do everything he can to
implement some kind of amnesty law before he leaves office. I would
not be surprised if he attempted some sort of Executive Order or
Presidential Directive in order to accomplish it. You see, it is
absolutely essential to the designers of despotism that our southern
border be eliminated. Absolutely essential. more... | NewWorldOrder |
America |
U.S. under U.N. law in health emergency World
Net Daily (August
28, 2007) - The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North
America summit in Canada released a plan that establishes U.N. law along
with regulations by the
World Trade Organization and
World Health
Organization as supreme over U.S. law during a pandemic and sets the
stage for militarizing the management of continental health
emergencies. The "North
American Plan for Avian & Pandemic Influenza" was finalized at the
SPP summit last week in Montebello, Quebec. At the same time, the U.S.
Northern Command, or NORTHCOM, has
created a webpage dedicated to avian flu and has been
running exercises in preparation for the possible use of U.S. military
forces in a continental domestic emergency involving avian flu or
pandemic influenza. With virtually no media attention, in 2005 President
Bush shifted U.S. policy on avian flu and pandemic influenza, placing
the country under international guidelines not specifically determined
by domestic agencies. The policy shift was formalized Sept. 14, 2005,
when Bush announced a new
International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza to a
High-Level Plenary Meeting of the U.N. General Assembly, in New York.
The new International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza was
designed to supersede an earlier November 2005
Homeland Security report that called for a U.S. national strategy
that would be coordinated by the Departments of Homeland Security,
Health and Agriculture. The 2005 plan, operative until Bush announced
the International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza, directed
the State Department to work with the WHO and U.N., but it does not
mention that international health controls are to be considered
controlling over relevant U.S. statutes or authorities. Under the
International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza, Bush agreed
the U.S. would work through the U.N. system influenza coordinator to
develop a continental emergency response plan operating through
authorities under the WTO,
North American Free Trade Agreement and the
U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization. WND could find no evidence
the Bush administration presented the Influenza Partnership plan to
Congress for oversight or approval. The SPP plan for avian and pandemic
influenza announced at the Canadian summit last week embraces the
international control principles Bush first announced to the U.N. in his
2005 International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza
declaration. The SPP plan gives primacy for avian and pandemic influenza
management to plans developed by the WHO, WTO, U.N. and NAFTA directives
– not decisions made by U.S. agencies. The U.N.-WHO-WTO-NAFTA plan
advanced by SPP features a prominent role for the U.N. system influenza
coordinator as a central international director in the case of a North
American avian flu or pandemic influenza outbreak. In Sept. 2005,
Dr. David Nabarro was appointed the first U.N. system influenza
coordinator, a position which also places him as a senior policy
adviser to the U.N. director-general. Nabarro joined the WHO in 1999 and
was appointed WHO executive director of sustainable development and
health environments in July 2002. In a Sept. 29, 2005,
press conference at the U.N., Nabarro made clear that his job was to
prepare for the H5N1 virus, known as the avian flu. Nabarro fueled the
global fear that an epidemic was virtually inevitable. In response to a
question about the 1918-1919 flu pandemic that killed approximately 40
million people worldwide, Nabarro commented, "I am certain there will be
another pandemic sometime." Nabarro stressed at the press conference
that he saw as inevitable a worldwide pandemic influenza coming soon
that would kill millions.
more...
| EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|NewWorldOrder |
America |
Now
imagine if a flu pandemic happened to break out purely by accident
of course... Could this be a way for global governance to take
control in an emergency? Certainly sounds like it. And Nabarro is
fueling the fire of fear in order to get people to accept this.
After all government has our best interest in mind, right?! We all
know
where this is leading and now it's here. Even so Lord Yeshua,
come!!! George Noory interviewed Jerome Corsi regarding this story
for the first hour on the
August 29 show. The spirit of antichrist doesn't
change...
Daniel 8:25 And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper
in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by
peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the
Prince of princes; but he shall be broken without hand.
How
do you destroy by peace? I think it is destroying in the name of
peace and with the terrorism in the world, our freedoms are being
taken away in the name of peace and security.
Revelation 6:1,2 And I saw when the Lamb opened one of the seals, and I
heard, as it were the noise of thunder, one of the four beasts
saying, Come and see. And I saw, and behold a white horse: and
he that sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given unto him:
and he went forth conquering, and to conquer.
Conquering in the name of peace, coming in with flatteries, and all
the other characteristics are coming into play today and the
globalist plan of bringing order out of chaos is well under way. I
believe we are seeing the process of the first seal being broken.
Will Presidential
Decision Directive #25 be Declassified?
Daniel
New
(August
2007) - What happened? On October 10, 1995, the 1/15
Battalion of the 3rd infantry Division of the U.S. Army came to
attention at 0900 in Schweinfurt, Germany. All but one of the 550
soldiers were wearing a sky-blue baseball-style cap with a United
Nations insignia on the front. One was wearing the olive-drab flat cap
that is authorized to be worn with the Battle Dress Uniform. With this
simple act of disobeying a direct order, Spc. 4 Michael New set the
stage for a legal battle that has profound implications for the future
of American soldiers into service of the United Nations without the
constitutional permission of Congress.
On 24 July, attorneys for Michael New sent a letter to
the Office of Information Programs and Services, a division of the State
Department, requesting a "Mandatory Declassification Review" of
Presidential Decision Directive #25. Most of our readers will recognize
that as the document which President Slick Willie Clinton authorized
himself to ignore the Constitution, ignore Congress, ignore
long-standing statutory law, and to send US troops into military
settings under the authority of the United Nations, without
Congressional participation in any way. We only recently learned that
this agency exists. We also learned that any citizen may request a
review of any classified document, and if that document is over ten
years old, a mandatory review of it is triggered by the request. PDD#25
is now 13 years old. What are the implications?
The implications for Michael New are
tremendous. The Pentagon and the White House based their
prosecution upon the basis of the order given to deploy to
Macedonia under a General from Finland. By refusing to allow a
soldier access to the legal basis of that order to deploy, New
had no defense. The original court-martial refused Spc. New
permission to introduce any evidence in his own defense! If we
can read PDD#25, we may well find the legal basis for demanding
that the court-martial be overturned.
The implications for our troops in uniform
today are also tremendous. If, for example, it is found that the
Constitution has been violated, (which we believe has happened),
then the entire question of placing American soldiers under
foreign commanders in undeclared wars may well find its way to a
courtroom - and we may well assist that in happening!
The implications for restoring the
Constitutional balance of power between Congress and the White
House, and restricting both with that very document to which
each and every one of them has taken an oath, are also great.
The implications of the US relationship to
all international agencies will suddenly be subject to a sharp
review by, of all things, the Constitution of the United States!
What a novel concept.
In short, this review could well be the point at
which imperial presidents are brought up short on a tether known as
Constitutional Law. Regional Alliances seem to be the "wave of the
future" - but the way we have been involved in them (since 1946)
just happens to be contrary to the U.S. Constitution. Not content
with the pace of Globalism, Bill Clinton and Al Gore decided to
"reinvent government" - in what was nothing less than a coup d'etat
against the Constitution! You may have thought that the case of
Michael New vs. United States Army was over and done with. I know we
did. But, you asked to be kept informed of any developments in
Michael's case, and this one, while a simple request for
information, may turn out to be huge. We'll let you know. The coming
book, to be entitled, Legions of Empire, by William Norman Grigg and
Daniel New, is coming along (slowly). Any person wanting to get a
copy of the first edition, hardback, autographed, needs to send us
$50 along with a request to reserve a copy in their name. That first
printing will consist of 500 hardback copies and 3,000 paperbacks.
The first 100 will be numbered and autographed. If we get all 100
pre-subscribed, it will mean we can pay for most of the raw printing
costs of the entire run. That's not everything, but it's a running
start! It is incumbent upon you to study, first that you may
understand the nature of the threats coming against our country, and
second that you might educate your children and the next generation,
for the Struggle for Liberty is not an event - it's a lifestyle.
more info
| EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|NewWorldOrder |
America |
National ID? How about a global ID?
Info World
(August
10, 2007) - A little-known
federation quietly lays the infrastructure for a universal identity
system that could eventually be implemented nationally or
internationally. The Federation for Identity and
Cross-Credentialing Systems (FiXs)
-- a little-known group of non-profits, government contractors,
commercial entities, and government agencies -- has just unveiled a
first-of-its-kind global infrastructure to support distributed,
integrated identity management and cross-credentialing across
organizations. The implementation combines several existing security
technologies along with a set of trusted models, policies, and
operating rules to insure the accurate identity of personnel
accessing physical sites or logical systems. Already in a pilot mode
at a handful of government agencies and defense contractors, the
FiXs identity management initiative does not have a hard date for
broad deployment, although the impediments do not appear to be
technical. “The cultural gap with the public in general is still too
wide,” said Dr. Mike Mestrovich, President of FiXs. “I think there
would have to be a public consensus to move us in that direction and
I don’t see that happening until at least 2009 or beyond.” Founded
in 2004 and based in Fairfax, Va., FiXs counts among its members the
Department of Defense (DoD), Wells Fargo, Lockheed Martin, EDS, and
several others. Modeled after secure electronic payment systems and
initially implemented by the DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC),
the FiXs initiative meets the objectives set forth in the October
2006 Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD-12). “Until now,
cross-bordering policies between government and industry had not
been established,” said Mary Dixon, director at the DMDC. The FiXs
implementation does not assign roles, grant or deny access, or
otherwise act as a gatekeeper. Rather, the mission of FiXs is simply
to authenticate the identity of participants within its member
organizations. Once verified by FiXs, individual site managers and
systems administrators assign or designate access controls based on
the role of the individual and the policies of a given organization.
FiXs’ capabilities allow it to cross between both public and private
sector organizations using a federated trust model. The
implementation is available worldwide in local or remote settings
via both wireless and wired environments. Access is available in
real time. An individual’s specific identity data remains within
their vetted source organization. “By its very nature, the federated
solution aids in privacy because there is no central database and
individual data can be stored in only one [vetted] place,” Dr.
Mestrovich said. Yet the distributed design and cross-organizational
model found in the FiXs implementation does offer the possibility of
a future national or international identity management system that
might cross borders and organizational boundaries. “The federated
approach can actually take the place of a mandated National ID
system,” Dr. Mestrovich stated.
|
Technology| NewWorldOrder | America
|
Thank you Vera for this article! This shows the subtle move to build
the infrastructure necessary to carry out the mark of the beast.
According to the Bible, without this mark a person will be unable to
buy or sell. But the Bible tells us the end, not always how it gets
to that point. I believe this is a good example of how the
infrastructure could be there without anyone really realizing it in
the population until the time came to implement it. Then say goodbye
to paper currency because nobody will accept it anymore. And without
this mark, you can't walk into a store and get anything unless it's
running out with alarms blaring. Vera adds,
"...this
worldwide trend is not the private work of a few secret societies-
it is openly being pushed by 1000s of engineers and business people
and government bureaucrats, all over the world, that want to either
make money or save money. No secrecy involved- this FiXs membership
open to any business or group interested in making money on identity
solutions, or driving forward their desire to identify terrorists or
give security clearances (DoD and GSA) - this is being driven by
companies and groups that want to make money, not conspiracies. This
ought to be raising waaaaay more eyebrows than RealID."
'Declaration of North American Integration' unearthed World Net
Daily (July
25, 2007) - The endorsement by a major city
mayor of a document described as "The Declaration of North American
Integration" represents a long-term effort by local governments to
bypass state and federal governments and work directly with Mexico
and Canada to create agreements that integrate the continent below
the radar screen, charges an activist.
Adam Rott, founder of watchdog blog
Oklahoma Corridor Watch, brought to light the document signed by
Mayor
Mick Cornett. The document was presented at the May 2004 summit
meeting of the North American International Trade Corridor
Partnership, or NAITCP. According to an
Internet-archived summary report of the meeting, held in Kansas
City, Mo., the document was signed by 90 people. Rott told WND he
created Oklahoma Corridor Watch because, "I saw the efforts in Texas
by Internet blogs such as
Texas Corridor Watch and
Texas Toll Party to get the word out in Texas about the
Trans-Texas Corridor. I wanted to warn Oklahoma about plans to
extend the Trans-Texas Corri
