While America isn't explicitly mentioned in Bible prophecy, it is here now.
This means either America's power is eliminated or diminished such that
from the other side of the world she has no power to do anything in the area
prophecy is discussing. Or America becomes part of
the beast'sNew World Order and is no longer identified as
a separate nation within the global governance control structure. It seems to
me that America is heading down this path now and I believe it will
actually be a combination of the two.
“You never want a serious crisis to
go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do
things you think you could not do before.” | Rahm
Emmanuel, November 21, 2008
Video
“Never waste a good crisis, and when
it comes to the economic crisis, don't waste it when it can have
a very positive impact on climate change and energy security.”
| Hilary Clinton, March 6, 2009 European
Parliament, Brussels
Video
We are currently going through great economic troubles both at
home and abroad and as said by Rahm Emmanuel and repeated by Hilary
Clinton, we can't let a crisis go to waste. America is becoming part of the
global community and with deceptive issues such as companies and
banks "too big to fail," man-made
global warming and other such things the world is subtly being brought to a place of
thinking as a global community under the care of government. This will lead to a desire to be run
globally, for the good of the planet of course. It all starts with
baby-steps and leads to the ultimate conclusion of Bible prophecy, a
global governance in control of every aspect of life even the
ability to buy, sell and thereby survive.
America is already being
destroyed financially, and as we find ourselves deeper in crisis, government
seems to be finding more to spend the money we don't have on. The process of integrating her into the one-world
government system is well under way. It has been Bush's expressed goal as well
as many other Presidents before with Obama now charging headlong into the
progressive plan. The blame falls not on Democrat or
Republican, but men of power without understanding (or spiritual influence
upon men) leading us straight to
where Bible prophecy places us, gone or part of the system. The ultimate destination of this plan will
end with America no longer existing as a sovereign nation, but most likely part of the
world government, controlled by the powerful few, and ultimately the
man of
sin.
The
L.O.S.T. treaty among other things are showing signs of a coming
loss of
national sovereignty from foreign laws and with the current fear
of terrorism globally, there's yet another reason that nations must
work together to supposedly bring about peace and security.
Examples The bottom line is that America isn't clearly present in
Bible prophecy, and judging from the power the beast will have over the
nations of the world, it's because we aren't a world power anymore, for one
reason or the other. Power in the end is centered in a
revived Roman Empire, Daniel's fourth kingdom.
I've always loved America because of the freedoms and the
Christian foundation I was allowed to have unlike some other more
restrictive places on earth. But all good things come to an end in this dark
world and as sad as I am to see it happening, I know also that our
redemption draws nigh.
Be open to
the possibility that absolute power corrupts absolutely and in this age of
self focus, all politicians are in a key place to be bribed, bought or flattered.
This will ultimately lead to all power being given to one man and that is
the point of sharing this information. The prophesied end cannot be changed,
but God has not left us in darkness regarding what is coming so remember how
close we could be to the end as you watch the news and how easily America
can and will fall into the hands of Lucifer...if it isn't already. This is
way beyond politics because no matter who wins, the end will be the same.
Don't get drawn into party lines, be aware that there is no line, the goal
is the same even if they don't know it.
I think it is important to examine a side of America's history
not commonly known. The Christian origins and foundations of our
nation are fairly well known, although that is under attack among
many other things today. There is another side, as there always is,
which I believe shows the mystery of iniquity at work in the shadows
of our past as well.
Hidden History of America's Beginnings
Examining America's beginnings in the eyes of "secret societies"
opens up a whole new world of secret agendas that eventually took
over America because of the nature of secret societies and their
dark deeds done out of the light of public opinion. I recommend you
watch the following videos for some background:
Secret Mysteries of America's Beginnings: The New Atlantis:
Volume One - Secret Mysteries of Americas Beginnings unfolds the fascinating history
behind the founding of America, and exposes the esoteric underbelly of its
design. Why is Washington D.C. built on the 77th Meridian? And are the
Revolutionary War cities really built in perfect alignment with Stonehenge? Follow the journey of secret societies from England to the New World and
learn of their ancient hope of establishing a democratic commonwealth that
would one day extend to all nations.
In the 16th century,
Sir Francis Bacon was at the helm of such societies
as the leader of the Rosicrucians and first Grand Master of modern
Freemasonry. As such, he is considered by some to be the true founder of
America. For centuries, controversy has surrounded this man who is said to be the
illegitimate son of Queen Elizabeth I and the real author behind the
Shakespeare plays.
When Bacon penned his classic work, The New Atlantis, he outlined his vision
for the perfect society; a democratic commonwealth governed by scientific
achievement. How were the founding fathers impacted by Bacon's plan? And is
America being driven by this vision today? Where The DaVinci Code meets National Treasure. Learn the incredible
secrets of the esoteric traditions, hidden within the manifold layers of
signs and symbols in our nation's infrastructure; symbols that for many
represent the secret destiny of the world's greatest nation. Running Time: 3 hour historical documentary
The Atlantis Connection
Google Video
2:22:11 - Award winning film maker of
Secret Mysteries of America’s Beginnings; Chris Pinto talks
about the connections between ancient Atlantis and the United
States of America.
Secret
Mysteries of America’s Beginnings: Riddles In Stone: Volume Two
- This documentary explores the highly controversial subject
of the design of America's capital. Was the city built to reflect the
majesty of America's newfound freedom? Or the hidden agenda of secret
societies? With every major cornerstone laid by Freemasons, was the city
built in a Masonic pattern?
Embark upon this incredible journey as Riddles in Stone interviews experts
on both sides of the heated debate. Watch as Freemason apologists defend
some of the most direct and hard-hitting questions concerning the influence
of Masonry in America, and its symbolism in Washington, D.C. Alongside them
are leading researchers who maintain that occult architecture permeates the
city, and conceals a secret agenda.
Was D.C. laid out according to the pattern of the stars? Is there really a
pentagram in the street layout north of the White House? Does a Masonic
square and compass extend from the Capitol building to the Washington
monument? And why is the city filled with zodiac symbols, mysterious faces,
and various god and goddess images? If America was founded as a Christian
nation only, where are the Christian images? Or does Washington D.C.
symbolize another Christ, the Masonic Christ? Find out, in this bold and sure-to-be controversial documentary.
Running Time: 3 hour historical documentary
Christian Origins Under Attack
In modern America, the Judeo-Christian roots of our nation and
the freedom they have provided are under attack by the secular
humanist and new age world. Both of these ideologies hold a view of
man as supreme, whether in a scientific or spiritual way. That is
not the principles upon which the founding fathers approached the
creation of the Constitution, rather God was viewed as the law-giver
upon whose foundation our nation would be built.
Wall Builders -
David Barton has thousands of documents (even personal letters) that
prove most of the founding fathers of America had a dependent
relationship with Jesus. They had several hours of prayer on their
knees before drafting the Constitution. Post by
FreeInHim at
FulfilledProphecy: "This myth regarding the religious
inclinations of the founding fathers, the 55 delegates who
participated in the four-month long Constitutional convention, was
started back in ‘95, by a professor of physics at L.A. Harbor
College named Steven Morris. He wrote an op-ed piece in the L.A.
Times entitled, “America’s Unchristian Beginnings.” The subtitle
read, “Founding Fathers: Despite preaching of our pious Right, most
were deists who rejected the divinity of Jesus.” It should be of
particular interest to any reader of this opinion piece that Steven
Morris is also a member of the L.A.-based Atheists United. It’s also
interesting to note that Mr. Morris chose the word “most” to portray
the number of founding fathers who were allegedly deists. A close
scrutiny of the writings of these men, both public and personal,
refutes that claim. To substantiate his claims, Morris lifted quotes
from various selected writings of a few of the founding fathers. As
you well know from studying the Bible, one can’t isolate a single
passage and expect to understand the message intended. One needs to
look at the entire column of scripture, at least, to get the gist of
the message. For example, concerning John Adams, Morris claimed,
“Late in life, he wrote “Twenty times in the course of my late
reading have I been upon the point of breaking out, “This would be
the best of all possible worlds if there were no religion in it!!!”
It’s true this statement did appear in a letter Adams wrote to
Thomas Jefferson in 1817, in which Adams recounted a conversation
between Joseph Cleverly and Lemuel Bryant; a schoolmaster and a
minister he had known. Fed up with the petty religious bickering
that went on between the two, Adams declared to Jefferson (now
please read carefully): Twenty times in the course of my late
reading have I been upon the point of breaking out, “This would be
the best of all possible worlds if there were no religion in it!!!”
But in this exclamation I would have been as fanatical as Bryant or
Cleverly. Without religion this world would be something not fit to
be mentioned in polite company, I mean hell. BTW, the following
month Jefferson wrote back and said he agreed! The revisionist
effort is self-evident and should be of no surprise. Deliberately
coloring the Christian beliefs of our founding fathers a darker hue,
or painting over them altogether, is a tact any atheist worth his
salt would attempt. To me, the really disturbing aspect of this ploy
isn’t the action of the atheist, but the willingness of good
Christians to swallow this diet of fraud without so much as a taste
test."
The Separation of Church and State
Wall Builders -
I just came across this article and wanted to share it with you all
in light of many attacks on Christianity in education and elsewhere.
Check out
Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed and some
current legal cases
resulting from the creation/evolution debate often evoking the
supposed "separation of church and state" issue to eliminate
religious discussion in education and even in public. Yet more
evidence of the mystery of iniquity at work today.
An explanation of the various forms of government and political
systems, and why America is not a democracy, but a republic.
Glossary of definitions:
despotism - a form of government in which
the ruler is an absolute dictator (not restricted by a
constitution or laws or opposition etc.)
tyranny - the government or rule of a
single person (dictator) or absolute ruler.
spectrum - a broad range of varied but
related ideas or objects, the individual features of which tend
to overlap so as to form a continuous series or sequence
federalist papers - a series of 85 articles
advocating the approval of the United States constitution
(1780's).
oligarchy - a form of government where
political power effectively rests with a small elite segment of
society distinguished by royalty, wealth, family, military
powers, etc. The word "oligarchy" is from the Greek words for
"few" and "rule"
Deterioration of the America That Was
The following I received from
NumbersUSA by e-mail
about the video they have now posted online. I believe this shows how the
America we know will not be as it was and this presentation shows us how. I
also believe this is part of the plan of the
New
World Order, along with many other designs, to remove America's power and
create a population more inclined to join the global community. It also
creates a fear of terrorism because of technology and desire of terrorists to
destroy America is real. Part of Lucifer's plan is to create the need for a
uniting leader capable of providing peace and security. The people have to
want peace and security first though. I highly recommend you watch the video
keeping the push for globalism in mind.
The video is especially important right now
because it shows why the annual immigration numbers count. Almost nobody in
the Senate or in the media right now wants to focus at all on the net
numbers involved in the Senate immigration bill. This video is a powerful
reminder that immigration policy, set by Congress, is fundamentally about
numbers.
It is worth noting that this video was produced in 1997. At the time, it was
based on the Census Bureau's projection of where both legal and illegal
immigration would lead the country. Since then, legal immigration has risen
so much that the population growth on the video covers little more than just
legal immigration and represents what would happen AFTER we virtually end
illegal immigration. Thus, the point is even more salient that we not only
have to end illegal immigration but we must substantially reduce legal – the
exact opposite of what the Senate immigration bill that would give out 35
million green cards in the next 20 years alone would do!
Why is this issue being
allowed to happen? Here is a short video regarding the North American Union. I
believe this is all steps to bring about a
New
World Order and a one-world government that will eventually be headed by
the antichrist. As for North America, plans are in the works to effectively
eliminate the borders over time, which will negatively impact American
sovereignty as our laws begin to be dictated to us from outside our nation.
This is all part of the plan for global governance. Visit here for a
Timeline of the Progress Toward A North American Union.
0:04:17
As you
read the following, ponder where our nation is at in each of these
points and how we have gotten to where we are today.
“The
American people will never knowingly adopt socialism, but under the name of
liberalism, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until
one day America will be a socialist nation without ever knowing how it
happened.”
| Norman Thomas, 1944
Campaign Speech (Christian Science Monitor 10/30/2008)
“Owners of capital will stimulate the working class
to buy more and more of expensive goods, houses and technology, pushing them
to take more and more expensive credits, until their debt becomes
unbearable. The unpaid debt will lead to bankruptcy of banks, which will
have to be nationalized, and the State will have to take the road which will
eventually lead to communism.” | Karl Marx, Das
Kapital, 1867
Communist Manifesto 1846
Abolition of private property
(How many Americans actually
own their land? How many could lose it to the government if
they didn't pay taxes? Is it really our land?)
Confiscation of property of rebels
(State seizing property of
"hate groups." With the
Alliance of Civilizations, "hate groups" are those
claiming sole ownership to the Truth, Bible-believing
Christians, Jews and fundamentalist Muslims.
See where this is going.)
Government ownership of communication and transportation
(What will happen in a state of
emergency because of "terrorism," revolt, or natural
disasters?)
Government ownership of factories and agriculture
(We've outsourced all that
for the love of money and the destruction of America.)
Government control of labor
Corporate farms, regional planning
Government control of education
(Look at our public school
system today, watch
Kent Hovind's presentations of how the
theory of
Evolution taught as fact is destroying faith in God and His
Word.)
I can see this being used during the war on the saints spoken
of in the Bible.
Daniel 7 |
Revelation 13 During the
time of great tribulation, there will be a war on those who
hold the testimony of Yeshua and who refuse to worship the man
of sin and participate in his New Age New World Order.
I can envision that the tattle telling of the community would
be the biggest way to ferret out those who are non-conformist
and who go against the new mandatory system. Those viewed as
"fundamentalists" will be hunted down and eliminated from
interfering with this new utopia-in-the-making for the greater
good. What this video addresses and what Barak Obama has been
moving toward regarding community service will make it very hard
for anyone who holds to the testimony of Yeshua and the Word of
God to not be faced with a choice that the Bible has stated is
an eternal choice. Trust in the world or trust in God.
Revelation 13:11-18 |
Revelation 14:9-12
PRESIDENTIAL POWERS IN TIMES OF EMERGENCY: Could
Terrorism Result In A Constitutional Dictator?
Writ FindLaw
(June 7, 2002)
- At present, the President has opted to
exercise only a few of his emergency powers. Under the National
Emergencies Act, at this time, he is only utilizing provisions
relating to the military. Will the President choose to use
additional powers? It depends on the future. Because we don't know
what shape this undeclared war on terrorism will take, we can't know
what powers this president - or any successor - might need to cope
with the problems of terrorism. An American President, should he
need them, possesses awesome powers. Those powers potentially
include what political scientists have described as the powers of a
"constitutional dictatorship." No President has ever had to go that
far - although they have come close. Now, however, it is not
difficult to conceive of scenarios where terrorist groups, hell-bent
on our destruction and refusing to abide by any known rules of war,
could employ weapons of mass destruction or bio-terrorism in a
manner that could threaten our existence as a nation. What happens
then?
Democracy In Crisis: Will It Transform Into
Another Form of Government?
Democracy works best in times of peace, when there
is debate, compromise, and deliberation in forming governing rules,
regulations, and policies. When confronted with a major crisis -
particularly one that is, like terrorism, of an unfamiliar nature -
the nation will turn to the President for initiative and resolute
leadership. If our very existence and way of life are threatened,
Americans will want their President to do whatever is necessary. The
history of democratic governments, from the ancient republics of
Greece and Rome to the modern states that have replaced earlier
totalitarian governments, show that governing by committees, or
legislative bodies, never works in times of crisis. Fortunately, our
Founders were aware of this when they designed our system. Alexander
Hamilton explained in Federalist No. 70 that the essential nature of
the chief executive is his "energy," which "is a leading [element]
in the definition of good government. It is essential to the
protection of the community against foreign attacks; it is no less
essential to the steady administration of the laws; to the
protection of property against those irregular and high-handed
combinations, which sometimes interrupt the ordinary course of
justice; to the security of liberty against the enterprises and
assaults of ambition, of faction, and of anarchy." While our
constitution contains no express provision for "emergency" or
"crisis" situations, such a provision is not necessary. The U.S.
Supreme Court made clear in Ex Parte Milligan,
following the Civil War, that "the government, within the
Constitution, has all the powers granted to it which are necessary
to preserve its existence." Or as one commentator has added,
"self-preservation is the first law of any nation."
Past presidents - principally Abraham Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, and
Franklin Roosevelt - by exercising their powers in time of
emergency, have expanded their authority as necessary to meet
emergencies they faced. They have, in essence, made the law in times
of crisis, not always in the manner envisioned. Lincoln launched the
Civil War unilaterally, without Congressional action, following the
secession of seven Southern states. Only later did he obtain
Congressional approval. His critics called him a dictator. But he
got the job done that had to be done. Wilson asked for and received
near dictatorial powers from Congress when attacks by Germany
against American ships and submarines plunged the nation into World
War I. He had to raise and equip a large army to fight on foreign
soil. To do so, he demanded and received unprecedented new power and
authority. When Franklin Roosevelt was inaugurated in 1933, the
world-wide Great Depression had reached its depths. The new
President promised action, and during his first 100 days, Congress
gave him what he needed to enable him to use federal powers to rout
the Depression and rescue every sector of the economy, as well as
state and local government, from economic ruin. Later, following the
1941 attack on Pearl Harbor, which forced the United States into
World War II, FDR's exertion of his presidential powers would far
exceed anything Wilson or Lincoln had done. Through the strength of
his personality, Roosevelt lead the nation from that day of "infamy"
through battles in Europe, Africa, Asia and the Pacific to total
victory. While FDR continued to ask Congress for what he needed, he
gave them no choice as to whether they would accede. For example, in
demanding that Congress repeal provisions in the Price Control Act
(prohibiting ceilings on certain food products), he told the
Congress: "In the event the Congress should fail to act, and act
adequately, I shall accept the responsibility, and I will act." And
he reminded the Congress: "The President has the power ... to take
measures necessary to avert a disaster which would interfere with
winning of the war." We've been blessed with strong presidents in
times of national crisis. They were men who demonstrated a capacity
for leadership, and men who acted undemocratically, but only to
preserve our democracy. We've been fortunate, for the distinction
between a "constitutional dictator" and a strong president is
remarkably thin, if not non-existent. As Writ columnist
Michael Dorf has noted, there are few checks on our Commander in
Chief.
Constitutional Dictatorships: What Happens to
Democracies in Emergencies
Rossiter looked at the phenomenon of
constitutional dictatorships in the aftermath of World War II, for
he was concerned that "more rather than fewer periods of crisis" lay
ahead. In Constitutional Dictatorship, he examines the
experiences of crisis governments ranging from the ancient
constitutional state of Rome to four modern states (Germany, France,
Great Britain, and the United States), focusing on four major crises
in the United States: the Civil War, the two World Wars, and the
Great Depression. Professor Albert Sturm, a student of Rossiter's
work, has also written of constitutional dictatorships. In a 1949
essay "Emergencies and the Presidency" in the Journal of Politics,
for example, Sturm found that these "temporary concentrations of
power in an executive" for meeting emergencies, which have been
"employed by vigorous democracies since ancient times," are
necessary for "the preservation of the established system in the
face of temporary crisis." Typically, such authority lasts only as
long as the crisis, Sturm notes, and it is sanctioned by the
"existing constitutional system."
Constitutional Dictatorship: Could It Happen
Here?
Of course, the very concept of a "dictatorship" is
offensive and inimical to our political thinking as citizens of a
democracy. And Rossiter acknowledges that no American government has
ever been a true constitutional dictatorship, as that concept is
understood by students of government. Rather, he uses the term, in
the American context, as "convenient hyperbole" - an exaggeration
meant to underscore how many, and how extensive, have been the
powers American presidents have necessarily arrogated to themselves
in wartime. Nevertheless, Rossiter, and other students of
constitutional dictatorships, do not rule out the idea that one
could ever exist in America. Indeed, they raised questions in the
aftermath of World War II that are still relevant today as we find
ourselves in an undeclared war, and the first stages of emergency
government. Recall that FDR took the nation from a "limited"
national emergency on September 8, 1939, to an "unlimited" emergency
by May 27, 1941, and then to total war by December 7, 1941. Anyone
who does not believe the war on terrorism will escalate, as well, is
in denial. Rossiter does not address the question of whether
Americans could tolerate the undemocratic ways of a constitutional
dictatorship. Instead, he is interested in the question of whether
we could survive the alternative. He asks, that is, if we could
"afford not to resort to undemocratic methods when such methods are
essential to the preservation of the state?" To raise the question
suggests the answer.
Terrorism Could Indeed Result In A
Constitutional Dictatorship
"Constitutional dictatorship is a dangerous
thing," Rossiter advises. Such governments are the result of
necessity, of the sheer imperative of survival. The greatest danger
with such a form of government, and its related institutions and
laws, is that they can remain after the crisis has abated. These are
not decisions that should be made by the President and Congress each
time the crisis escalates; rather, we should think about them
carefully in advance in order to make prudent decisions later. One
need only look at the haste and thoughtlessness with which we have
adopted the potentially dangerous USA PATRIOT Act, most of which
Republicans and Democrats alike had earlier rejected, to understand
why legislating in the aftershock of terrorism should be avoided if
possible. Our present emergency laws and regulations are a
hodgepodge, a patchwork quilt. They respond to precedents from past
great crises, and that is wise, but unfortunately these precedents
do not contemplate a protracted war on terrorism, or an enemy unlike
any we have ever confronted. Congress has the power to determine
whether it wants the American equivalent of a constitutional
dictator in the White House. The only way to be certain that we
don't make that decision during a crisis, is to revise and codify
our emergency laws now - before fear and anger in the aftermath of a
possible attack might cause us to make bad decisions, and too easily
trade liberty for security in numerous areas. As I write this
column, President Bush has announced that he will address the nation
about his plans for restructuring the government for fighting the
war on terrorism. None of Professor Rossiter's observations about
our history is more chilling than his finding that each national
crisis has left the nation a little less democratic than before.
With the President's announcement, it is not too soon to consider
whether, in fighting terrorism, we really want a constitutional
dictator to lead us. I certainly don't, nor do I know anyone who
does, but if a future attack comes, and is devastating, the pressure
to resort to constitutional dictatorship may be irresistible.
Revelation 13:3-10 And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death;
and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered
after the beast. And they worshipped the dragon which gave
power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who
is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him? And
there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and
blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and
two months. And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to
blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in
heaven. And it was given unto him to make war with the
saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all
kindreds, and tongues, and nations. And all that dwell
upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in
the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the
world. If any man have an ear, let him hear. He that leadeth
into captivity shall go into captivity: he that killeth with the
sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and
the faith of the saints.
Here's how a globalist views the logic of history leading to
globalism. When you see that it was planned that way and
laid out in 1871 by Albert
Pike, the wickedness of the globalist agenda in light of Bible
prophecy points to the
war on the saints described as the
great tribulation.
"Rhodes scholars Bill Clinton, Strobe Talbott and Richard
Gardner were largely responsible for
Javier Solana's
appointment as head of NATO in 1995." |
Björn
(farmer), regarding revelations in the new
book,
Comrad J
America Abroad Time
Magazine:
Strobe Talbott (July 20, 1992)
- The human drama, whether played out in history books or headlines,
is often not just a confusing spectacle but a spectacle about
confusion. The big question these days is, Which political forces
will prevail, those stitching nations together or those tearing them
apart? Here is one optimist's reason for believing unity will
prevail over disunity, integration over disintegration. In fact,
I'll bet that within the next hundred years (I'm giving the world
time for setbacks and myself time to be out of the betting game,
just in case I lose this one), nationhood as we know it will be
obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. A
phrase briefly fashionable in the mid-20th century -- "citizen of
the world" -- will have assumed real meaning by the end of the 21st.
All countries are basically social arrangements, accommodations to
changing circumstances. No matter how permanent and even sacred they
may seem at any one time, in fact they are all artificial and
temporary. Through the ages, there has been an overall trend toward
larger units claiming sovereignty and, paradoxically, a gradual
diminution of how much true sovereignty any one country actually
has. The forerunner of the nation was a prehistoric band clustered
around a fire beside a river in a valley. Its members had a
language, a set of supernatural beliefs and a repertoire of legends
about their ancestors. Eventually they forged primitive weapons and
set off over the mountain, mumbling phrases that could be loosely
translated as having something to do with "vital national interests"
and "manifest destiny." When they reached the next valley, they
massacred and enslaved some weaker band of people they found
clustered around some smaller fire and thus became the world's first
imperialists. But it has taken the events in our own wondrous and
terrible century to clinch the case for world government. With the
advent of electricity, radio and air travel, the planet has become
smaller than ever, its commercial life freer, its nations more
interdependent and its conflicts bloodier. The price of settling
international disputes by force was rapidly becoming too high for
the victors, not to mention the vanquished. That conclusion should
have been clear enough at the battle of the Somme in 1916; by the
destruction of Hiroshima in 1945, it was unavoidable. Once again
great minds thought alike: Einstein, Gandhi, Toynbee and Camus all
favored giving primacy to interests higher than those of the nation.
So, finally, did many statesmen. Each world war inspired the
creation of an international organization, the League of Nations in
the 1920s and the United Nations in the '40s. The cold war also saw
the European Community pioneer the kind of regional cohesion that
may pave the way for globalism. Meanwhile, the free world formed
multilateral financial institutions that depend on member states'
willingness to give up a degree of sovereignty. The International
Monetary Fund can virtually dictate fiscal policies, even including
how much tax a government should levy on its citizens. The General
Agreement on Tariffs and Trade regulates how much duty a nation can
charge on imports. These organizations can be seen as the
protoministries of trade, finance and development for a united
world. Globalization has also contributed to the spread of
terrorism, drug trafficking, AIDS and environmental degradation. But
because those threats are more than any one nation can cope with on
its own, they constitute an incentive for international cooperation.
However limited its accomplishments, last month's Earth Summit in
Rio signified the participants' acceptance of what Maurice Strong,
the main impresario of the event, called "the transcending
sovereignty of nature": since the by-products of industrial
civilization cross borders, so must the authority to deal with them.
Collective action on a global scale will be easier to achieve in a
world already knit together by cables and airwaves. The fax machine
had much to do ! with the downfall of tyrants in Eastern Europe. Two
years ago, I was assigned an interpreter in Estonia who spoke with a
slight Southern accent because she had learned her English watching
Dallas, courtesy of TV signals beamed over the border from
neighboring Finland. The Cosby Show, aired on South African
television, has no doubt helped erode apartheid. more...
Bush Hands Over Reins of U.S. Economy to EU
Newsmax
(November 19, 2008) - The results of
the G-20 economic summit amount to nothing less than the seamless
integration of the United States into the European economy. In one month
of legislation and one diplomatic meeting, the United States has
unilaterally abdicated all the gains for the concept of free markets won
by the Reagan administration and surrendered, in total, to the Western
European model of socialism, stagnation, and excessive government
regulation. Sovereignty is out the window. Without a vote, we are
suddenly members of the European Union. Given the dismal record of those
nations at creating jobs and sustaining growth, merging with the
Europeans is like a partnership with death.
At the G-20 meeting, Bush agreed to subject the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) and our other regulatory agencies to the supervision of
a global entity that would critique its regulatory standards and demand
changes if it felt they were necessary. Bush agreed to create a College
of Supervisors. According to The Washington Post, it would "examine the
books of major financial institutions that operate across national
borders so regulators could begin to have a more complete picture of
banks' operations." Their scrutiny would extend to hedge funds and to
various "exotic" financial instruments. The International Monetary Fund
(IMF), a European-dominated operation, would conduct "regular vigorous
reviews" of American financial institutions and practices. The
European-dominated College of Supervisors would also weigh in on issues
like executive compensation and investment practices.
There is nothing wrong with the substance of this regulation. Experience
is showing it is needed. But it is very wrong to delegate these powers
to unelected, international institutions with no political
accountability. We have a Securities and Exchange Commission appointed
by the president and confirmed by the Senate, both of whom are elected
by the American people. It is with the SEC, the Treasury, and the
Federal Reserve that financial accountability must take place.
The European Union achieved this massive subrogation of American
sovereignty the way it usually does, by negotiation, gradual
bureaucratic encroachment, and without asking the voters if they
approve. What's more, Bush appears to have gone down without a fight,
saving his debating time for arguing against the protectionism that
France's Nicolas Sarkozy was pushing. By giving Bush a seeming victory
on a moratorium against protectionism for one year, Sarkozy was able to
slip over his massive scheme for taking over the supervision of the U.S.
economy.
All kinds of political agendas are advancing under the cover of
responding to the global financial crisis. Where Franklin Roosevelt
saved capitalism by regulating it, Bush, to say nothing of Obama, has
given the government control over our major financial and insurance
institutions. And it isn't even our government! The power has now been
transferred to the international community, led by the socialists in the
European Union.
Will Obama govern from the left? He doesn't have to. George W. Bush has
done all the heavy lifting for him. It was under Bush that the
government basically took over as the chief stockholder of our financial
institutions and under Bush that we ceded our financial controls to the
European Union. In doing so, he has done nothing to preserve what
differentiates the vibrant American economy from those dying economies
in Europe.
Why have 80 percent of the jobs that have been created since 1980 in the
industrialized world been created in the United States? How has America
managed to retain its leading 24 percent share of global manufacturing
even in the face of the Chinese surge? How has the U.S. GDP risen so
high that it essentially equals that of the European Union, whose
population is 50 percent greater? It has done so by an absence of
stifling regulation, a liberation of capital to flow to innovative
businesses, low taxes, and by a low level of unionization that has given
business the flexibility to grow and prosper.
Europe, stagnated by taxation and regulation, has grown by a pittance
while we have roared ahead. But now Bush — not Obama — Bush has given
that all up and caved in to European socialists. The Bush legacy?
European socialism. Who needs enemies with friends like Bush?
|
EU/UN/4th Kingdom
|
NewWorldOrder|
America|
Obama |
Economic Crisis
|
7-year plan aligns U.S. with Europe's economy
WorldNet Daily (January 16, 2008) -
Six U.S. senators and 49 House members are advisers for a
group working toward a Transatlantic Common Market between the U.S. and
the European Union by 2015. The
Transatlantic Policy Network – a non-governmental organization
headquartered in
Washington and Brussels – is advised by the
bi-partisan congressional TPN policy group, chaired by Sen. Robert
Bennett, R-Utah. The plan – currently being implemented by the Bush
administration with the formation of the Transatlantic Economic Council
in April 2007 – appears to be following a plan written in 1939 by a
world-government advocate who sought to create a Transatlantic Union as
an international governing body. An economist from the World Bank has
argued in print that the formation of the Transatlantic Common Market is
designed to follow the blueprint of Jean Monnet, a key intellectual
architect of the European Union, recognizing that economic
integration must inevitably lead to political integration. As
WND previously reported, a key step in advancing this goal was the
creation of the
Transatlantic Economic Council by the U.S. and the EU through an
agreement signed by President Bush, German Chancellor Angela Merkel
– the current president of the European Council – and European
Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso at a White House summit meeting
last April. Writing in the Fall 2007 issue of the Streit Council journal
"Freedom and Union,"
Rep. Jim Costa, D-Calif., a member of the TPN advisory group,
affirmed the target date of 2015 for the creation of a Transatlantic
Common Market. Costa said the Transatlantic Economic Council is
tasked with creating the Transatlantic Common Market regulatory
infrastructure. The infrastructure would not require congressional
approval, like a new free-trade agreement would.
Writing in the same issue of the Streit Council publication, Bennett
also confirmed that what has become known as the "Merkel initiative"
would allow the Transatlantic Economic Council to integrate and
harmonize administrative rules and regulations between the U.S. and the
EU "in a very quiet way," without introducing a new free trade agreement
to Congress. No document on the TEC website suggests that any of the
regulatory changes resulting from the process of integrating with the EU
will be posted in the Federal Register or submitted to Congress as new
free-trade agreements or as modifications to existing trade agreements.
In addition to Bennett, the advisers to the Transatlantic Policy Network
includes the following senators: Thad Cochran, R-Miss.; Chuck Hagel,
R-Neb.; Barbara Mikulski, D-Md.; Pat Roberts, R-Kan.; and Gordon Smith,
R-Ore. Among the 49 U.S. congressmen on the
TPN's
Congressional Group are John Boehner, R-Ohio; John Dingell, D-Mich.;
Kenny Marchant, R-Texas; and F. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wisc. WND
contacted Bennett's office for comment but received no return call by
the publication deadline. A
progress report on the TEC website indicates the following U.S.
government agencies are already at work integrating and harmonizing
administrative rules and regulations with their EU counterparts: The
Office of Management and Budget, the Food and Drug Administration, the
Environmental Protection Agency, the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration and the Securities and Exchange Commission. The
Streit
Council is named after Clarence K. Streit, whose 1939 book "Union
Now" called for the creation of a Transatlantic Union as a step toward
world government. The new federation, with an international
constitution, was to include the 15 democracies of U.S., UK, France,
Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands, Ireland,
New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland and South Africa. Ira Straus,
the founder and U.S. coordinator of the
Committee on Eastern Europe and Russia in NATO, a group dedicated to
including Russia within NATO,
credits Bennett as TPN chairperson with reviving Streit's work "seven
decades later." A globalist with leftist political leanings,
Straus was a Fulbright professor of political science at Moscow State
University and the Moscow State Institute of International Relations
from 2001 to 2002. The congruity of ideas between Bennett and Streit
is clear when Bennett writes passages that echo precisely goals Streit
stated in 1939. more...
|
EU/UN
/4th Kingdom
|NewWorldOrder | America|
Now I'm not the brightest
bulb in the box when it comes to money markets or international
trade, but understanding
what
Bible prophecy says about the timing of the end and the
kind of global financial system that will be in place, I
think things are becoming more clear even to a clueless guy like
me. With the financial troubles in the credit and housing
markets, lenders keep having to get bailed out by the European
Central Bank and Federal Reserve (neither federal or reserve),
more and more people are beholden financially to international
bankers. Notice all the company consolidation going on too? As
good deals pop up or financial woes threaten companies and
individuals, those with money can buy the property, companies,
etc. In the case of housing, how many people actually own their
homes? And of those, how many will be able to continue to pay
property taxes if the system crashes? What happens if you don't
pay taxes? I believe this is all leading down a road to a
collapsing bridge where in the crash, a new financial system
will arise from the ashes that is global in nature and no nation
will be in a position to deny it because over time it has been
the international bankers who have been manipulating and
controlling the financial markets and making all the money. From
the article above, "An economist
from the World Bank has argued in print that the formation of
the Transatlantic Common Market is designed to follow the
blueprint of Jean Monnet, a key intellectual architect of the
European Union, recognizing that economic integration must
inevitably lead to political integration."
The international trade agreements and the global war on terror
is all coming to a head that will work very well I think with
the financial difficulties that many nations are having now. But
then again, maybe I'm way off...
“Give
me control of a Nation's money and I care not who makes the laws.”
|
Mayer Amschel Bauer (Rothschild)
NAFTA Cementing a North American Union News
With Views (December 29, 2007) -
Millions of
Americans are now aware of the plan for a North American Union (NAU)/Security
and Prosperity Partnership (SPP). This awareness came via the Internet
thanks to
Phyllis Schafly and Dr. Jerome Corsi (video).
Lou Dobbs has given it an extraordinary amount of exposure during his
shows on CNN; the rest of CNN ignores it. The silence by ABC, CBS,
NBC, MSNBC, and FAUX (FOX) "news" networks has been
deafening. The attack by legends in their own minds, i.e.,
pusillanimous individuals like Michael Medved, have been remarkable
and a shame upon their so-called profession.
If you are not familiar with this final step in
the complete and total destruction of our sovereign republic, I strongly
recommend you
go to this web site and watch this
fully documented and factual slide presentation on this plan which I
call treason. The definition of treason is: disloyalty or treachery to
one's country or it's government. Treason is any attempt to overthrow
the government or impair the well-being of a state to which one owes
allegiance; the crime of giving aid or comfort to the enemies of one's
government. I don't believe it is inappropriate to use the word treason
when it comes to this plan to integrate America into one region with all
the trappings of totalitarian government. We are now starting to see the
provisions kicking in at hyper speed to finally destroy these united
States of America and let me lay it out crisp and clear: The destruction
of NAFTA was felt within the first 18 months and has continued to
destroy our sovereignty and job bases ever since. In the first few
years, over 4,000 factories closed down, small towns became dying towns.
To date MILLIONS of jobs have been lost with more all the time because
of
the evil called out sourcing. America continues to lose in the fair
trade arena; instead we are steadily being crushed by the evil of "free"
trade. In 1995, American businesses were notified by the IRS that that
under NAFTA, they would have to make all of their federal employment
taxes by electronic transfer;
view this document here. Why? The same reason we the people are
being taxed to death to pay for new infrastructure inside Mexico:
one world government. One worker base of three countries merged into
one region, all under the same homogenized laws.
Despite the massive invasion of illegal aliens
crossing over our borders, neither Marxist Bill Clinton or globalist
George Bush, made any effort to stop it and millions of Americans -
especially post 911 - simply could not understand why Bush has
steadfastly refused to do what President Eisenhower
did so effectively. Many of us who have
been in the trenches for decades knew and now millions more know: a
North American Union means just that. No borders, no sovereign nations,
just one big region for these diabolically evil men and women who lust
for raw power to rule over us and they don't care who they destroy on
their path to supreme imperialism. more...
| NewWorldOrder |
America |
North American Union 'a couple years away'
WorldNet Daily
(November 19, 2007)
-
Bilderberg author who 1st exposed plot in 1996 sees EU replication as
imminent. The next giant step toward world government will be
integration of the U.S., Canada and Mexico in European Union-style
merger in the next few years, says the author of a best-selling book on
the power of shadowy international organizations promoting the move. "I
would say [it's just] a couple of years away," reports Daniel Estulin,
author of "The
True Story of the Bilderberg Group." Estulin, a Canadian now living
in Europe, says the original plans for a North American Union involved
the U.S. and Canada as the prime participants. It was motivated
primarily by the desire to harvest Canada's abundant natural resources.
In his new book, Estulin reveals the first efforts in this plan date
back to 1996 when the elite Bilderberg Group first discussed plans for
the dismantlement of Canada as an independent nation and proposed its
merger – minus Quebec – with the United States into a Greater North
America. "Actually, the North American Union, or rather a Canada-U.S.
merger, was initially discussed shortly after the Reagan-Bush candidacy
won the White House," he says in an interview with WND. "Upon taking
over the reins of the country, George Bush and Ronald Reagan called in
the presidents of the key trans-national companies and asked them for
the real picture. The money people told them that if the United States
were a corporation it would have to be shut down immediately. It was
bankrupt." The solution proposed then, according to Estulin, was merger
between the U.S. and Canada. "Canada is virgin country with a multitude
of natural resources, water, mines, oil, gas, etc.," he explains. "They
decided that it was going to take 14 or 15 years to put the whole
project together. In the interval, the economies, social programs and
laws of the two countries would be quietly harmonized as much as
possible." Back then, part of that harmonization plan involved the
separation of Quebec as an independent state, he says. "Actually, when
all is said and done, it all comes down to money," Estulin says. "Money
makes its own rules. If your goal is to make the most money possible
using Canada's natural resources, what would you ask for? Number one,
give me control over the sun. Number two, give me control over the air.
Number three, give me control over water. Now, we know we cannot control
the sun, nor can we control the air. But we can control water. Water,
after all, is the most important element that can be controlled." But
the plot for a North American Union, as exposed in detail in Jerome
Corsi's new bestselling book,
"The Late Great USA," is but a prelude, Estulin says, to the
ultimate merger – one-world government. more... |
EU/UN
/4th Kingdom
|NewWorldOrder |
America|
November 13, 1979:
While officially declaring his candidacy for U.S. President,
Ronald Reagan proposes a “North American Agreement” which will
produce “a North American continent in which the goods and
people of the three countries will cross boundaries more
freely.” -
Timeline of the Progress Toward a North American Union
Is America's Sovereignty Obsolete?
Human Events (October
22, 2007) - When Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said, “Americans have
lost trust in their government” at the Values Voters’ gathering in
Washington, DC, there was more than a wee bit of irony in his words.
McCain elaborated on the theme yesterday on “Fox News Sunday,” saying
the distrust comes from corruption in Washington, frustration at the
Iraq war, incompetence in the Katrina relief and from failure to deal
with illegal immigration. The irony is in the confluence of the two
McCains: recognition that part of the distrust of government arises from
a failure -- now six years after 9-11 -- to secure our borders from
incursion by illegal aliens. McCain’s realization is not shared by
President Bush whose press secretaries -- first Tony Snow and now Dana
Perino -- have said that he is still convinced he was right in the
failed “comprehensive” approach to illegal immigration which translated
into amnesty for illegal aliens and would not have secured our borders.
It is no exaggeration to say that a nation which does not secure its
borders cannot claim sovereignty. Sovereignty -- the supremacy of
political power a nation has over its own actions -- seems to mean a
great deal less to free world leaders than to their Chinese, Russian and
Islamist counterparts. It is important to frame the issue just that way
because among the free nations, especially in Europe, sovereignty is
eroding and unfree nations guard their sovereignty with paranoid fervor.
The leaders of too many free nations -- including President Bush --
appear to be in competition to give away their nations’ sovereignty by
placing more and more authority in supranational organizations like the
UN and the European Union which are not accountable to voters. This week
will feature “UN Day” and we’ll again be lectured about international
law and how we owe the world -- which means the UN -- respect for the
‘laws’ it adopts. Under the UN charter, which we signed sixty years ago,
resolutions of the UN Security Council have the force of international
“law.” But what does that mean? Judge Robert Bork memorably wrote in
“Coercing Virtue”:
International law
is not law but politics. For that reason, it is dangerous to
give the name “law,” which summons up respect, to political
struggles that are essentially lawless. The problem is not
merely the anti-Americanism that grips foreign elites and shapes
law; it is also the American intellectual class, which is
largely hostile to the United States and uses international law
to attack the morality of its own government and society.
To foreign elites and
our “intellectual class”, American sovereignty is passé: a concept
that has outlived its time that should be limited at every
opportunity by international “law” in the form of treaties and
decisions of the Security Council and UN-created courts. American
sovereignty is based on our Constitution. There is no provision in
the Constitution for US law to be made by the UN or any of the
“courts” it creates. George W. Bush may go down in the history books
incorrectly as a “unilateralist” president for taking action in
Iraq, but his legacy -- most of which is still undecided -- may be
just the opposite. more... |
EU/UN
/4th Kingdom
|NewWorldOrder |
America|
I've been putting off presenting this
information I've learned because it disturbs me greatly and I'm very
wary of the group vehemently dividing our nation, but I can't
explain away what I've learned. If we are truly as near to the end
as the
HIStory, Our Future Bible studies seem to point, then
this makes perfect sense and fits into that timeline. I would
recommend that study first as a foundation to what this gets into.
If you would rather not know anything that will destroy your current
perception, do not visit the link. If you do, read and watch
everything before deciding anything. Honestly examine what is
presented as it is presented and remember
Romans 12:19-21.
In my hesitancy, I've called it
Beating around the Bush's Please remember that Yeshua told us
to watch and share the Gospel, not get involved in politics of the
world. We cannot change what is about to unfold as it was foretold
in scripture to glorify God. Our escape is through Yeshua Ha
Mashiach, Jesus the Messiah. So rather than be ruled by anger and
vengeance, share His selfless love and let God do the avenging for
the wickedness of the world. We are not of this world but we are the
salt and light of it.
Proverbs 18:13 He
that answers a matter before he hears it, it is folly and shame unto him.
Outrage Erupts Over Bush Demands in Murder Case
WorldNet Daily
(October 10, 2007) -
What the U.S. government
wants in the Medellin murder case, now being heard before the U.S.
Supreme Court, is "bizarrely grotesque," according to the chief counsel
for the
Alliance Defense Fund. And
the warning from ADF Chief Counsel
Benjamin Bull notes that the case, being pursued by President Bush
through the Department of Justice, could result in U.S. laws being
subjugated to U.N. resolutions and rules to the point that local police
officers will have to spend more time studying international law than
catching criminals. "The notion that an international body can Mirandize
the right of an illegal immigrant to call a consulate, so that if the
local police trip up and innocently don't to it, a convicted
rapist-torturer-murderer goes free, goes beyond bizarrely grotesque,"
Bull, whose organization has filed an amicus brief on the issue, told
WND. At issue is the death penalty verdict for Jose Medellin, who
confessed in 1993 to participating in the rape and murder of two Houston
teenagers. Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena were sodomized and
strangled with their shoe laces. Medellin then boasted of keeping one
girl's Mickey Mouse watch as a souvenir of the crime. The Bush
administration is before the U.S. Supreme Court seeking to overturn the
death penalty, at the behest of the International Court of Justice, a
division of the United Nations. Medellin and four others were
convicted of capital murder and sent to Texas' death row. A juvenile
court sentenced Medellin's younger brother, who was 14 at the time, to
40 years in prison. But the Bush administration intervention came after
the U.N.'s International Court of Justice found Medellin was not
informed of his right to contact the Mexican Consulate for legal
assistance. That, according to the Hague, was a violation of a 1963
treaty known as the Vienna Convention. more...
|
EU/UN
/4th Kingdom| NewWorldOrder |America|
In two words, "global
governance." And the world will give their power to the beast
because none can make war with him. They have slowly given all their
rights and freedoms over to a man who comes in with flattery to
deceive and take the freedom of others to later exert his control on
them through changing the laws and the times.
Daniel 7:25 And he shall speak great words against the most High,
and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to
change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand
until a time and times and the dividing of time.
Which brings me to an update,
the
Treaty of Lisbon. This is the beginning of the coming legal war
on the saints. How much control does Europe apparently already have?
And what will happen when America's economy collapses and Europe has
to bail us out financially, will there be any option but obedience
or fighting, but they're expecting and prepared for both. That is
why we must pray and forgive, loving our enemies for vengeance is
the Lord's, He will repay justly.
Euro Could Replace U.S. Dollar As Favored Reserve Currency
Associated
Press (September 17, 2007) - Former
U.S. Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan said it is possible that
the euro could replace the U.S. dollar as the reserve currency of
choice. According to an advance copy of an interview to be published in
Thursday's edition of the German magazine Stern, Greenspan said that the
dollar is still slightly ahead in its use as a reserve currency, but
added that "it doesn't have all that much of an advantage" anymore. The
euro has been soaring against the U.S. currency in recent weeks, hitting
all-time high of $1.3927 last week as the dollar has fallen on turbulent
market conditions stemming from the ongoing U.S. subprime crisis. The
Fed meets this week and is expected to lower its benchmark interest rate
from the current 5.25 percent. Greenspan said that at the end of 2006,
some 25 percent of all currency reserves held by central banks were held
in euros, compared to 66 percent for the U.S. dollar. In terms of being
used as a payment for cross-border transactions, the euro is trailing
the dollar only slightly with 39 percent to 43 percent. Greenspan said
the European Central Bank has become "a serious factor in the global
economy." He said the increased usage of the euro as a reserve currency
has led to a lowering of interest rates in the euro zone, which has
"without any doubt contributed to the current economic growth."
|
EU/UN
/4th Kingdom| NewWorldOrder |
America|
Breaking News: Looks like Solana's NGO cheering
section in the form of Worldwatch Institute is getting in on his
power boosting act. Read about that here.
It has now called for the EU to pressure the USA on climate change.
Maybe we should have Lester Brown and his World Watch Institute
register as the foreign agents they evidently are!
A frightening headline on a
Fox news
story ran yesterday. It indicated:
1. Germany's Angela Merkel
says they will no longer support
increased sanctions against Iran on the nuclear development
issue.
2. Assumption in Washington is that this means they won't care if
USA does something unilaterally to take that threat out.
3. Germany's economic relationship with Iran makes it unfeasible for
them to support sanctions against that oil rich country.
Now, the reality, probabilities, and prophetic
implications:
1. Germany's
Angela Merkel could not be more closely allied with the EU's foreign
and military policy chief, Javier Solana.
2.
Europe is already bitter at the USA for the 2003 Iraq invasion.
Also click here for more
documentation.
3. European Union countries have been
handing Solana the immense powers
they have to EQUALIZE
themselves with the USA.
4. A prophesied God given role of whoever the prophesied "10 kings"
handed their power to was to equalize themselves with another power
"and thus fulfill the words of this prophecy." See Rev. 17.
5. If Germany can't afford to antagonize Iran with sanctions, how
much less can it afford to antagonize Iran by tacitly sanctioning
war?
6. Germany's agenda during its recently closed EU presidency was to
boost Javier Solana's powers --
it made tremendous progress on crafting a treaty that would give him
the powers he sought in the constitution. It has placed (with
the help of EU allies inside England) Solana in a much stronger
position than he was prior to that German presidency.
7. Javier Solana's Brookings Institution speech of March 21, 2007
said that
global disarmament and non-proliferation were "imperative" to him.
He also said it was "imperative" that the
new global governance machinery be ready by 2009.
8. This new public hint that the USA is considering imprudent
bombing operations against Iran might be exactly what Javier Solana
needs to give European countries "the crisis that equals
opportunity" rationale to put him over the top with the powers he
needs
to consolidate
the 2 million scattered separate European country
armies, their navies, their weaponry, etc.
valued at over $200 billion USD
per EU sources.
9. The NATO weaponry is sitting in Europe with
more
European control than USA control, thanks in no small part to
Javier Solana's splitting of the commands between Brussels and
Norfolk during his NATO tenure between 1995 and 1999.
10. There are clear Biblical prophecies about a great Babylon being
destroyed by fire and the ships at sea bewailing her burning? Could
that be the USA the prophets were seeing? "In one hour is thy
destruction come?"
11. The threat of the USA bombing a necessary oil and economic
resource for European countries such as Iran could very well give
credence to the increasing demands that
"Europe speak with one voice."
12. Very clearly, Javier Solana is and has been the "face and voice
of Europe."
13. Never forget
what
created Javier Solana's job and what
he proposed to increase his powers.
I am writing this in shock and on the fly. I must go
to my office for an appointment. I will add hyperlinks to this story and
amplify it later. We indeed live in serious times and I fear for my
country. Stay tuned!
|
EU/UN
/4th Kingdom
|
Solana
|
NewWorldOrder |
America|
I highlighted in red the date
that Javier Solana believes it imperative to have the global
governance machinery in place by, 2009, because of the conclusions
arrived at in the
HIStory, Our Future Bible studies placing the abomination
of desolation in February of 2009! This was discovered thanks to the
diligent research of those noted in the study before I got the
confirming evidence of Herb L. Peter's research. Before then, I
didn't know much about European politics or how much it is
fulfilling Bible prophecy. This is just another confirming piece to
the puzzle. Remember that God has not left those watching in
darkness that we should be caught like a thief! His Word is being
fulfilled today!
Will Lady Liberty Last Beyond 2010? News
With Views (August 31, 2007)
- Free republics are not known to have long life
expectancies. At the ripe old age of two hundred and thirty-one,
America is definitely showing her age. She is long past her prime,
and some are predicting her demise. No, some are PLANNING her
demise. Thomas Jefferson and the other founders of this once-great
country believed there was a controlling cabal that was crafting
America's servitude. With the assistance of Heaven, they decided to
fight those forces. Pastors fought with fiery sermons from the
pulpit; newsmen fought with the power of the pen; statesmen fought
in the halls of congress; and merchants fought with the sacrifice of
their material gain. Together, they lifted Lady Liberty to her feet
and defeated the powers of darkness. It took the global elite a long
time to recover, but they have reemerged with a vengeance. They are
now on the precipice of accomplishing what their great granddaddies
failed to do: bring the rebellious colonists under their power and
control. You see, we no longer have the will to resist servitude.
Our pulpits are too busy preaching a prosperity gospel; newsmen are
in bed with the forces they once disdained; statesmen have been
replaced with opportunistic, self-serving politicians; and merchants
know no god but money. Hence, it is left to a small--and I mean very
small--remnant to sound the clarion call for freedom and
independence. Unfortunately, few seem to be listening to their
cries. 2010 seems to be a banner year for these designers of
despotism. That is the target year for the implementation of the
North American Community, which will unite the United States with
Canada and Mexico. The global elite suffered a minor set-back when
the U.S. Senate failed to pass the Bush/McCain/Kennedy/Graham
amnesty-for-illegal-aliens bill. But if you think that George W.
Bush is going to let that bill lie on the floor of defeat, you don't
understand these people. President Bush will do everything he can to
implement some kind of amnesty law before he leaves office. I would
not be surprised if he attempted some sort of Executive Order or
Presidential Directive in order to accomplish it. You see, it is
absolutely essential to the designers of despotism that our southern
border be eliminated. Absolutely essential. more... | NewWorldOrder |
America |
U.S. under U.N. law in health emergency World
Net Daily (August
28, 2007) - The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North
America summit in Canada released a plan that establishes U.N. law along
with regulations by the
World Trade Organization and
World Health
Organization as supreme over U.S. law during a pandemic and sets the
stage for militarizing the management of continental health
emergencies. The "North
American Plan for Avian & Pandemic Influenza" was finalized at the
SPP summit last week in Montebello, Quebec. At the same time, the U.S.
Northern Command, or NORTHCOM, has
created a webpage dedicated to avian flu and has been
running exercises in preparation for the possible use of U.S. military
forces in a continental domestic emergency involving avian flu or
pandemic influenza. With virtually no media attention, in 2005 President
Bush shifted U.S. policy on avian flu and pandemic influenza, placing
the country under international guidelines not specifically determined
by domestic agencies. The policy shift was formalized Sept. 14, 2005,
when Bush announced a new
International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza to a
High-Level Plenary Meeting of the U.N. General Assembly, in New York.
The new International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza was
designed to supersede an earlier November 2005
Homeland Security report that called for a U.S. national strategy
that would be coordinated by the Departments of Homeland Security,
Health and Agriculture. The 2005 plan, operative until Bush announced
the International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza, directed
the State Department to work with the WHO and U.N., but it does not
mention that international health controls are to be considered
controlling over relevant U.S. statutes or authorities. Under the
International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza, Bush agreed
the U.S. would work through the U.N. system influenza coordinator to
develop a continental emergency response plan operating through
authorities under the WTO,
North American Free Trade Agreement and the
U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization. WND could find no evidence
the Bush administration presented the Influenza Partnership plan to
Congress for oversight or approval. The SPP plan for avian and pandemic
influenza announced at the Canadian summit last week embraces the
international control principles Bush first announced to the U.N. in his
2005 International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza
declaration. The SPP plan gives primacy for avian and pandemic influenza
management to plans developed by the WHO, WTO, U.N. and NAFTA directives
– not decisions made by U.S. agencies. The U.N.-WHO-WTO-NAFTA plan
advanced by SPP features a prominent role for the U.N. system influenza
coordinator as a central international director in the case of a North
American avian flu or pandemic influenza outbreak. In Sept. 2005,
Dr. David Nabarro was appointed the first U.N. system influenza
coordinator, a position which also places him as a senior policy
adviser to the U.N. director-general. Nabarro joined the WHO in 1999 and
was appointed WHO executive director of sustainable development and
health environments in July 2002. In a Sept. 29, 2005,
press conference at the U.N., Nabarro made clear that his job was to
prepare for the H5N1 virus, known as the avian flu. Nabarro fueled the
global fear that an epidemic was virtually inevitable. In response to a
question about the 1918-1919 flu pandemic that killed approximately 40
million people worldwide, Nabarro commented, "I am certain there will be
another pandemic sometime." Nabarro stressed at the press conference
that he saw as inevitable a worldwide pandemic influenza coming soon
that would kill millions.
more...
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|NewWorldOrder |
America |
Now
imagine if a flu pandemic happened to break out purely by accident
of course... Could this be a way for global governance to take
control in an emergency? Certainly sounds like it. And Nabarro is
fueling the fire of fear in order to get people to accept this.
After all government has our best interest in mind, right?! We all
know
where this is leading and now it's here. Even so Lord Yeshua,
come!!! George Noory interviewed Jerome Corsi regarding this story
for the first hour on the
August 29 show. The spirit of antichrist doesn't
change...
Daniel 8:25 And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper
in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by
peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the
Prince of princes; but he shall be broken without hand.
How
do you destroy by peace? I think it is destroying in the name of
peace and with the terrorism in the world, our freedoms are being
taken away in the name of peace and security.
Revelation 6:1,2 And I saw when the Lamb opened one of the seals, and I
heard, as it were the noise of thunder, one of the four beasts
saying, Come and see. And I saw, and behold a white horse: and
he that sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given unto him:
and he went forth conquering, and to conquer.
Conquering in the name of peace, coming in with flatteries, and all
the other characteristics are coming into play today and the
globalist plan of bringing order out of chaos is well under way. I
believe we are seeing the process of the first seal being broken.
Will Presidential
Decision Directive #25 be Declassified?
Daniel
New
(August
2007) - What happened? On October 10, 1995, the 1/15
Battalion of the 3rd infantry Division of the U.S. Army came to
attention at 0900 in Schweinfurt, Germany. All but one of the 550
soldiers were wearing a sky-blue baseball-style cap with a United
Nations insignia on the front. One was wearing the olive-drab flat cap
that is authorized to be worn with the Battle Dress Uniform. With this
simple act of disobeying a direct order, Spc. 4 Michael New set the
stage for a legal battle that has profound implications for the future
of American soldiers into service of the United Nations without the
constitutional permission of Congress.
On 24 July, attorneys for Michael New sent a letter to
the Office of Information Programs and Services, a division of the State
Department, requesting a "Mandatory Declassification Review" of
Presidential Decision Directive #25. Most of our readers will recognize
that as the document which President Slick Willie Clinton authorized
himself to ignore the Constitution, ignore Congress, ignore
long-standing statutory law, and to send US troops into military
settings under the authority of the United Nations, without
Congressional participation in any way. We only recently learned that
this agency exists. We also learned that any citizen may request a
review of any classified document, and if that document is over ten
years old, a mandatory review of it is triggered by the request. PDD#25
is now 13 years old. What are the implications?
The implications for Michael New are
tremendous. The Pentagon and the White House based their
prosecution upon the basis of the order given to deploy to
Macedonia under a General from Finland. By refusing to allow a
soldier access to the legal basis of that order to deploy, New
had no defense. The original court-martial refused Spc. New
permission to introduce any evidence in his own defense! If we
can read PDD#25, we may well find the legal basis for demanding
that the court-martial be overturned.
The implications for our troops in uniform
today are also tremendous. If, for example, it is found that the
Constitution has been violated, (which we believe has happened),
then the entire question of placing American soldiers under
foreign commanders in undeclared wars may well find its way to a
courtroom - and we may well assist that in happening!
The implications for restoring the
Constitutional balance of power between Congress and the White
House, and restricting both with that very document to which
each and every one of them has taken an oath, are also great.
The implications of the US relationship to
all international agencies will suddenly be subject to a sharp
review by, of all things, the Constitution of the United States!
What a novel concept.
In short, this review could well be the point at
which imperial presidents are brought up short on a tether known as
Constitutional Law. Regional Alliances seem to be the "wave of the
future" - but the way we have been involved in them (since 1946)
just happens to be contrary to the U.S. Constitution. Not content
with the pace of Globalism, Bill Clinton and Al Gore decided to
"reinvent government" - in what was nothing less than a coup d'etat
against the Constitution! You may have thought that the case of
Michael New vs. United States Army was over and done with. I know we
did. But, you asked to be kept informed of any developments in
Michael's case, and this one, while a simple request for
information, may turn out to be huge. We'll let you know. The coming
book, to be entitled, Legions of Empire, by William Norman Grigg and
Daniel New, is coming along (slowly). Any person wanting to get a
copy of the first edition, hardback, autographed, needs to send us
$50 along with a request to reserve a copy in their name. That first
printing will consist of 500 hardback copies and 3,000 paperbacks.
The first 100 will be numbered and autographed. If we get all 100
pre-subscribed, it will mean we can pay for most of the raw printing
costs of the entire run. That's not everything, but it's a running
start! It is incumbent upon you to study, first that you may
understand the nature of the threats coming against our country, and
second that you might educate your children and the next generation,
for the Struggle for Liberty is not an event - it's a lifestyle.
more info
| EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|NewWorldOrder |
America |
National ID? How about a global ID?
Info World
(August
10, 2007) - A little-known
federation quietly lays the infrastructure for a universal identity
system that could eventually be implemented nationally or
internationally. The Federation for Identity and
Cross-Credentialing Systems (FiXs)
-- a little-known group of non-profits, government contractors,
commercial entities, and government agencies -- has just unveiled a
first-of-its-kind global infrastructure to support distributed,
integrated identity management and cross-credentialing across
organizations. The implementation combines several existing security
technologies along with a set of trusted models, policies, and
operating rules to insure the accurate identity of personnel
accessing physical sites or logical systems. Already in a pilot mode
at a handful of government agencies and defense contractors, the
FiXs identity management initiative does not have a hard date for
broad deployment, although the impediments do not appear to be
technical. “The cultural gap with the public in general is still too
wide,” said Dr. Mike Mestrovich, President of FiXs. “I think there
would have to be a public consensus to move us in that direction and
I don’t see that happening until at least 2009 or beyond.” Founded
in 2004 and based in Fairfax, Va., FiXs counts among its members the
Department of Defense (DoD), Wells Fargo, Lockheed Martin, EDS, and
several others. Modeled after secure electronic payment systems and
initially implemented by the DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC),
the FiXs initiative meets the objectives set forth in the October
2006 Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD-12). “Until now,
cross-bordering policies between government and industry had not
been established,” said Mary Dixon, director at the DMDC. The FiXs
implementation does not assign roles, grant or deny access, or
otherwise act as a gatekeeper. Rather, the mission of FiXs is simply
to authenticate the identity of participants within its member
organizations. Once verified by FiXs, individual site managers and
systems administrators assign or designate access controls based on
the role of the individual and the policies of a given organization.
FiXs’ capabilities allow it to cross between both public and private
sector organizations using a federated trust model. The
implementation is available worldwide in local or remote settings
via both wireless and wired environments. Access is available in
real time. An individual’s specific identity data remains within
their vetted source organization. “By its very nature, the federated
solution aids in privacy because there is no central database and
individual data can be stored in only one [vetted] place,” Dr.
Mestrovich said. Yet the distributed design and cross-organizational
model found in the FiXs implementation does offer the possibility of
a future national or international identity management system that
might cross borders and organizational boundaries. “The federated
approach can actually take the place of a mandated National ID
system,” Dr. Mestrovich stated.
|
Technology| NewWorldOrder | America
|
Thank you Vera for this article! This shows the subtle move to build
the infrastructure necessary to carry out the mark of the beast.
According to the Bible, without this mark a person will be unable to
buy or sell. But the Bible tells us the end, not always how it gets
to that point. I believe this is a good example of how the
infrastructure could be there without anyone really realizing it in
the population until the time came to implement it. Then say goodbye
to paper currency because nobody will accept it anymore. And without
this mark, you can't walk into a store and get anything unless it's
running out with alarms blaring. Vera adds,
"...this
worldwide trend is not the private work of a few secret societies-
it is openly being pushed by 1000s of engineers and business people
and government bureaucrats, all over the world, that want to either
make money or save money. No secrecy involved- this FiXs membership
open to any business or group interested in making money on identity
solutions, or driving forward their desire to identify terrorists or
give security clearances (DoD and GSA) - this is being driven by
companies and groups that want to make money, not conspiracies. This
ought to be raising waaaaay more eyebrows than RealID."
'Declaration of North American Integration' unearthed World Net
Daily (July
25, 2007) - The endorsement by a major city
mayor of a document described as "The Declaration of North American
Integration" represents a long-term effort by local governments to
bypass state and federal governments and work directly with Mexico
and Canada to create agreements that integrate the continent below
the radar screen, charges an activist.
Adam Rott, founder of watchdog blog
Oklahoma Corridor Watch, brought to light the document signed by
Mayor
Mick Cornett. The document was presented at the May 2004 summit
meeting of the North American International Trade Corridor
Partnership, or NAITCP. According to an
Internet-archived summary report of the meeting, held in Kansas
City, Mo., the document was signed by 90 people. Rott told WND he
created Oklahoma Corridor Watch because, "I saw the efforts in Texas
by Internet blogs such as
Texas Corridor Watch and
Texas Toll Party to get the word out in Texas about the
Trans-Texas Corridor. I wanted to warn Oklahoma about plans to
extend the Trans-Texas Corridor along Interstate 35 north into our
state." Rott said it should be clear to everyone "that the
international business interests and government officials working
with them do not intend to stop the four-football-fields wide TTC-35
at the Texas border with Oklahoma." "Oklahoma has been at work for
almost 15 years to get I-35 designated as a NAFTA superhighway,"
Rott said. "I want to wake Oklahomans up to the reality that
Oklahoma is on the front lines of the battle being waged by
investment bankers, foreign investment consortia and politicians who
stand to benefit to expand the TTC-35 north into Oklahoma." WND
contacted Cornett's office for comment, but the mayor did not
respond. "What is so diabolical about Cornett's signature is that it
has largely remained hidden from view since 2004," Rott charged. "It
is disturbing to think that councilmen and councilwomen who live in
our communities are working for North American integration in the
mistaken notion that globalism will result in local economic
development." Roth is skeptical of the promise North American
integration holds for economic development in Oklahoma. "What we see
is the sovereignty of the U.S. being compromised at a local level,
and we have yet to see where globalism has benefited Oklahoma City,"
he said. "Our manufacturing base is deteriorating in Oklahoma City
as plants close and multinational corporations outsource from
Oklahoma to get cheaper workers in international markets." Oklahoma
Republican
state Sen. Randy Brogdon agrees. Brogdon told WND he believes
"the ramifications of what Oklahoma City Mayor Cornett is doing is
to destroy U.S. national sovereignty and to grab property like we
have never seen before." Brogdon was outspoken in his opposition to
North American integration. more... | NewWorldOrder |
America |
Javier Solana & The Larger PlanNews With Views: Dennis L. Cuddy (July
23, 2007) - In
my July 2 NewsWithViews.com
column, I gave a specific
example of how the power elite’s dialectical process worked (a micro
analysis). In this new article here, I’ll look at the larger picture
(macro analysis) of how a single incident or individual fits into
the power elite’s larger plan. To do this, I’ll refer to Constance
Cumbey’s excellent June 17 NWV
column regarding Javier
Solana, Canada, and other elements. As I’ve mentioned before, one of
the primary power elitists was Cecil Rhodes, whose secret Society of
the Elect was “to take the government of the whole world.” Canadian
P.E. Corbett was a member of this group, and in his Post-War
Worlds (1942) described their plan to form a world government by
linking regional arrangements which would involve trade, investment,
distribution of food and raw materials, migration, etc. After World
War II, Rhodes scholars packed the Canadian external affairs office
of Lester Pearson, who probably had a great deal to do with
President Truman’s firing of U.S. General Douglas MacArthur. This is
because MacArthur had displeased Canada (and Britain) by his efforts
to win the Korean War. Thus, Canada has played an important role in
the power elite’s plans. Constance Cumbey began her article by
stating, “In March of 1995, there was a near shooting war. . .
between Spain and Canada.” She then referred to Solana’s “BIG plans”
involving “mutually advantageous trading terms over the area’s
resources leading to a Mediterranean Free Trade Zone by 2010.” To
accomplish this, the larger plan was to get rid of Yugoslavia’s
Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic, who was standing in the way of
linking the European Union’s trade corridor to the power elite’s
desired Mediterranean regional arrangement because of his conflict
with Croatia and Kosovo. In Washington Post columnist William
Raspberry’s interview of me on the subject on December 18, 1995, he
wrote: “Cuddy says he is tempted more and more to look for economic
explanations for what seems otherwise inexplicable. . . . . Cuddy
notes that the United States is now involved in negotiating a
Transatlantic Free Trade Agreement with Europe.” In early June 1995,
Secretary of State Warren Christopher announced regarding the
Transatlantic Free Trade Area: “We intend to give it the serious
study it deserves, with its considerable potential to form an
element of our overall strategy. . . . The long-term objective is
the integration of the economies of North America and Europe,
consistent with the World Trade Organization.” In Constance Cumbey’s
article, she referred to Solana chairing the “Transatlantic
Alliance,” and in my June 12, 2006 NWV column on “Global
Integration,” I spelled out
the details of the “New Transatlantic Agenda,” not only involving
education (portability of academic credits, etc.) but the Agenda
further stated that “governments too are obliged to adapt their
economic training and social welfare programs.” Constance Cumbey
concluded her article referring to the New Age influence on
Canadians Maurice Strong and former Prime Minister Paul Martin. The
power elite’s larger plan regarding spirituality involves a
synthesis of all religions into “A Common Faith” (the title of
humanist John Dewey’s 1934 book). And prominent Canadians have
played a significant part in the plan. Dorothy MacLean, formerly
with British Intelligence, in the 1990s was president of the New Age
Canadian Lorian Association. The first head of the World Health
Organization (WHO) was Canadian psychiatrist Brock Chisholm (1959
Humanist of the Year), who wrote in Psychiatry (February 1946): “We
have swallowed all manner of poisonous certainties fed us by our
parents, our Sunday and lay school teachers, our politicians, our
priests. . . . the reinterpretation and eventual eradication of the
concept of right and wrong which has been the basis of child
training, the substitution of intelligent and rational thinking for
faith in the certainties of old people, these are the belated
objectives. . . for charting the changes in human behavior.” Just 3
months later, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation on May 5, 1946
aired a speech by Dr. Ewen Cameron, who would in 1953 become
president of the American Psychiatric Association and later receive
CIA funds to conduct horrible LSD and control experiments on people.
In the speech titled “The Building of the Coming World Order,” he
declared: “. . . What we call morals, are simply the customs,
prohibitions and rules which a society maintains at any given time.
. . . What we have once set up, we can set up again, and better. . .
. The United Nations Organization deserves the support of all who
are concerned with the building of a New World Order. . . . There
can be only one education anywhere on earth and that is education
for world citizenship.” Maurice Strong was former U.N.
Secretary-General Kofi Annan’s right-hand man. And long-time U.N.
Assistant Secretary-General Robert Muller has based the curriculum
for his many Robert Muller schools around the world on the
underlying teachings of Luciferian Alice Bailey. Muller and former
Canadian parliament member Douglas Roche in 1995 co-authored a book
advocating a “common security agenda as the basis for a new world
order.” This was after Roche at the World Conference of Religion for
Peace in Louvain, Belgium (August 28-September 3, 1974) delivered a
report titled “We can achieve a New World Order,” thus showing the
power elite’s larger plan to use religion to bring about their New
World Order of a World Socialist Government and One World Religion.
Check out Constance Cumbey's latest article on Javier Solana and the
UN.
|
EU/UN/4th Kingdom |
Solana |
NewWorldOrder |
America |
Bush to pressure Senate to revive U.N. sea treaty
World
Net Daily (May
13, 2007) - Critics say it would put 70% of Earth under
control of global bureaucracy. In a move that
has already angered some of his most ardent supporters, President
Bush has asked the Democratic leadership in the U.S. Senate to
revive a proposal for ratification of the
United Nation's Law of the Sea Treaty, an international
agreement defeated two years ago by Republican leadership in the
upper house. Critics say ratification would compromise U.S.
sovereignty and place 70 percent of the Earth's surface under the
control of the U.N. – even providing for a "tax" that would be paid
directly to the international body by companies mining in the
world's oceans. The battle over the Law of the Sea Treaty first
began 25 years ago, eventually being torpedoed by President Reagan.
It resurfaced in 2004 under the sponsorship of Sen. Richard Lugar,
R-Ind., and was successfully defeated by then Senate Majority Leader
Bill Frist, R-Tenn. President Bush announced his intention to seek
reintroduction of LOST for ratification to a small group of trusted
Republican grass-roots organizers last week – an announcement that
was met with horror and scorn. Eagle Forum leader Phyllis Schlafly,
Center for Security Policy President Frank Gaffney, Leadership
Institute President Morton Blackwell, Free Congress Foundation
founder Paul Weyrich and leaders of the Heritage Foundation were
quick to denounce the idea in forceful terms, calling on their
members to begin lobbying the White House immediately. LOST has long
had the support of environmental groups such as the Natural
Resources Defense Council. It would establish rules governing the
uses of the of the world's oceans – treating waters more than 200
nautical miles off coasts as the purview of a new international U.N.
bureaucracy, the International Seabed Authority. The ISA would have
the authority to set production controls for ocean mining, drilling
and fishing, regulate ocean exploration, issue permits and settle
disputes in its own new "court." Companies seeking to mine or fish
would be required to apply for a permit, paying a royalty fee.
Critics also point out the new U.N. agency would have the right to
compete directly with private companies in those profit-making
activities. The U.S. would have only one vote of 140 – and no veto
power as it has on the U.N. Security Council. The Bush
administration claims the initiative for reintroduction of the
treaty comes from the military, which likes the 12-mile territorial
limits it places on national claims to waters. Yet, critics point
out international law already protects non-aggressive passage,
including non-wartime activities of military ships. One of the main
authors of LOST not only admired Karl Marx but was an ardent
advocate of the Marxist-oriented New International Economic Order.
Elisabeth Mann Borgese, a socialist who ran the World Federalists of
Canada, played a critical role in crafting and promoting LOST,
as WND reported in 2005.more...
Bush OKs 'integration' with European Union WorldNetDaily
(May 8, 2007) - President Bush
signed an agreement creating a "permanent body" that commits the
U.S. to "deeper transatlantic economic integration," without
ratification by the Senate as a treaty or passage by Congress as a
law. The "Transatlantic Economic Integration" between the U.S. and
the European Union was
signed April 30 at the White House
by Bush, German Chancellor Angela Merkel – the current president of
the European Council – and European Commission President José Manuel
Barroso. The
document acknowledges "the transatlantic economy remains at the
forefront of globalization," arguing
that the U.S. and the European Union "seek to strengthen
transatlantic economic integration." The agreement established a new
Transatlantic Economic Council to be chaired on the U.S. side by a
cabinet-level officer in the White House and on the EU side by a
member of the European Commission. The current U.S. head of the new
Transatlantic Economic Council is
Allan Hubbard, assistant to the
president for Economic Policy and director of the National Economic
Council. The current EU head of the council is
Günther Verheugen, vice-President of
the European Commission in charge of enterprise and industry. The
Transatlantic Economic Council was tasked with creating regulatory
convergence between the U.S. and the EU on some 40 different public
policy areas, including intellectual property rights, developing
security standards for international trade, getting U.S. GAAP
(Generally Accepted Accounting Practices) recognized in Europe,
developing innovation and technology in health industries,
implementing RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) technologies,
developing a science-based plan on bio-based products and
establishing a "regular dialogue" to address obstacles to
investment. At a
joint press conference, Bush thanked
the other two leaders for signing the "trans-Atlantic economic
integration plan," commenting that, "It is a recognition that the
closer that the United States and the EU become, the better off our
people will be." Barroso said the Transatlantic Economic Council is
meant to be "a permanent body, with senior people on both sides of
the Atlantic." As
WND has reported, Secretary of
Commerce Carlos Gutierrez repeatedly has pushed for North American
integration, much as the April 30 agreement proposes closer U.S.-EU
integration. Mexico's ambassador to the U.N., Enrique Berruga, has
called for a North American Union to be created in the next eight
years.more...
| EU/UN/4th Kingdom | NewWorldOrder |
America |
Global
governance is not necessarily losing national identity, but having
laws dictated by foreign interests. This is exactly what is
happening. In a Western world that prides itself on rule of law,
whoever writes the laws controls the nations. What is being worked
toward now is integrating international law that trumps national
law. This is a very dangerous game to play with men hungry for
power. They have done an effective job hiding their evil intentions
from the world and to find out what they've been up to one must
search it out. Most people are content with their personal situation
enough to let things move on in their course. The Security and
Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP.gov)
is meeting in a formal organizational structure working to integrate
and harmonize our laws. The course of the world today is taking us
directly to the fulfillment of Bible prophecy and those in control
in the world are not looking out for the interests of the world, but
are consolidating their power to control the world with their brand
of laws meant to further solidify their control. This will
eventually be handed over to the antichrist. That the man of sin is
said to come from a revived Rome -- See Daniel 9:26,27 -- is interesting considering what has been occurring since EUROMED
-- E.U. "ROMED" -- in 1995 with the consolidation of power in
Europe. Now we are seeing this integration of international trade is
creating the infrastructure and the beginning of governmental
integration that can more easily be used in the future to integrate
control of many nations through laws dictated from outside the
United States. This is only the beginning, and it starts out
seemingly insignificant so as not to catch the ire of the
population.
"We are grateful to
the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other
publications whose directors have attended our meetings and
respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It
would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world
if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during
those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared
to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty
of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to
the National auto-determination practiced in past centuries." | David Rockefeller in an
address to Trilateral Commission meeting, 1991
A report on President Clinton's Executive Order 13107: "The
Implementation of Human Rights Treaties"
Crossroad.to
(signed on December 10, 1998) - While Americans focused on
more scintillating news, President Clinton quietly signed a new
executive order titled "The Implementation of Human Rights
Treaties." The media ignored it and our leaders didn't tell us. Yet
we will pay the cost -- in freedom as well as dollars -- for the
creation of a massive government bureaucracy to promote, monitor,
and enforce compliance with human rights regulations mandated by the
United Nations. Remember, this governing body shows only contempt
for biblical values, American sovereignty, and the U.S.
Constitution. Clinton's timing was perfect. An attack on Iraq had
been planned. And after December's impeachment proceedings, Congress
would adjourn for the holidays. Without its objection, the executive
order would take effect within 30 days (not a hard and fast rule 1),
and become a federal law. Once implemented, no one would be free to
do or say anything contrary to the new global ideology. Hard to
believe? Before studying the executive order itself, take a look at
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It illustrates the
deceptive meanings behind the noble words used to persuade the
American people to accept unthinkable regulations. Even so, on
December 10, 1998, President Clinton used its 50th anniversary to
celebrate its ideals, to honor its late sponsor Eleanor Roosevelt,
to announce his Human Rights Initiatives, and to sign this executive
order.
Background Information
At the first glance, the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights sounds good, as do all the intrusive UN human
rights treaties. Article 18 upholds "the right to freedom of
thought, conscience and religion..." Article 19 affirms "the right
to freedom of opinion and expression... and to seek, receive and
impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of
frontiers." But Article 29 states that "these rights and freedoms
may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles
of the United Nations." In other words, these "rights" or "freedoms"
don't apply to those who would criticize the UN or its policies.
Your rights would be conditioned on your compliance. Only if your
message supports official ideology are you free to speak it. As
Andrei Vishinsky wrote in The Law of the Soviet State, "There
can be no place for freedom of speech, press, and so on for the foes
of socialism."[2] The Convention on the Rights of the Child has not
been ratified by the Senate. Yet, it would be included among "other
relevant treaties" in this executive order which begins with these
words:
"By the authority vested in me as President by
the Constitution and bearing in mind the obligations of the
United States pursuant to the International Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights and other relevant treaties concerned with
the protection and promotion of human rights to which the United
States is now or may become a party in the future, it is hereby
ordered."
Like the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
the
UN Convention on the Rights of the
Child uses manipulative and misleading language.
According to Article 13, "The child shall have the right to freedom
of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive,
and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of
frontiers..." In other words, parents have no authority to keep a
child from reading a sexually explicit magazine or visiting pagan
chat rooms on Internet. While parents lose their right to set safe
boundaries for their children, the State assumes full power to
"protect" the child and define the rules. Thus Article 13 concludes
with: "This right may be subject to certain restrictions, but these
shall only be such as are provided by law and are necessary for
respect of the rights or reputations of others; or for protection of
national security or public order." Likewise, if parents restrict
their child's "right to freedom of association" or their child's
ambiguous rights to "privacy" or "conscience and religion" (Articles
14 -16), they would break this law and face the potential loss of
their child to the state's "protection" services. In the context of
UN ideology, "national security or public order" refers to the
concept of solidarity, a utopian community oneness based on shared
values defined by globalist leaders. In their minds, anything less
than social solidarity in every community could stir conflict or
incite violence. In this context, dissenters become foes; facts or
beliefs that clash with its vision of unity become threats; and the
uncompromising truths of biblical Christianity become intolerable,
even dangerous to public safety.
These "human rights" restrictions are already
filtering into American culture. For example, any Christian website
that promotes biblical standards for right and wrong could be
targeted for censorship by Cyber Patrol, the world's most powerful
Internet thought police. Owned by The Learning Company, America's
"premier developer of educational software," it has formed some
powerful "partners"
around the world. These include AOL, AT&T, Bell Atlantic,
CompuServe, IBM, Microsoft, Netscape, Scholastic Network, and
others. Its
website [3] shows the
categories in its
CyberNOT Block List, a
list of offenses that determines which websites should be screened
to protect schools and families that buy their service. These
dangers include Violence/Profanity, Nudity, Sexual Acts,
Intolerance, Satanic/Cult, Drugs, and Militant/Extremist. Notice
"Intolerance" amidst the more obvious threats. CyberPatrol warns us
that "any picture or text that elevates one group over another"
would be considered intolerant. Their filters now "protect" children
and schools across the country from visiting American Family
Association and other Christian websites simply because they present
God-given warnings and view Christian truth and lifestyles as
superior to pagan alternatives. An international "Declaration on
Tolerance," prepared by UNESCO and signed by its member nations,
defines the new global standard for right and wrong. All nations
would be responsible for fulfilling this international contract by
teaching the "right" kind of tolerance and training their people to
"respect" every kind of ritual and lifestyle -- no matter how
contrary to God's Word. Though the U.S. didn't sign this
anti-Christian Declaration 4, our leaders are fueling the
transformation. Consider how its decrees would undermine our Bill of
Rights:
"Tolerance is respect, acceptance and
appreciation of the rich diversity of our world's culturesIt is not only a moral duty, it is also a political and
legal requirement."
"Tolerance involves the rejection of
dogmatism and absolutism." [Biblical truth?]
"Tolerance... means that one's views are not
to be imposed on others." [Would this end freedom to share
the gospel with others? Could the UN still share its views?]
"Intolerance... is a global threat."
"Scientific studies and networking should be
undertaken to coordinate the international community's response
to this global challenge, including analysis of root causes and
effective countermeasures, as well as research and monitoring...
"
"Tolerance promotion and the shaping of
attitudes of openness, mutual listening and solidarity should
take place in schools and universities, and through non-formal
education... at home and in the workplace."
"Promote rational tolerance teaching methods
that will address the cultural, social, economic, political and
religious sources of intolerance-- major roots of violence and
exclusion. 5"
As you read on, you will see how the suggestions
in the last three points are worked into President Clinton's
Initiatives and Executive Order. But don't forget, the first four
points provide the rationale for the last three points. more...
America in the News
- Keep tabs on what is going on with America and how
that may relate to Bible prophecy.
National Debt Clock - A real-time clock showing US national
debt broken down into several categories.
Bubble
Markets Inventory Tracking
- Market forces are driven by
supply and demand. So why doesn't the real estate industry provide
comprehensive inventory data for the public? This blog attempts to
do just that for select Western US real estate markets. Each
market's housing inventory numbers are tracked monthly with (sales
volume) by their side along with comparison numbers from the year
prior.
UnAnswered Questions for Stanley Sporkin (2006)
- Stanley Sporkin
has been retained by the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise
Oversight (OFHEO) to assist in its duties overseeing Fannie Mae
-- one of the largest issuers of mortgage backed securities and
related derivatives in the world. Why should we care? All Americans are impacted by the health and well being of
Fannie Mae's operation - as homeowner, as investor and as
taxpayers.
The entire US mortgage market is
currently dependent on several private corporations that
enjoy special governmental credit support (called Government
Sponsored Enterprises or GSEs). Because of their size, the
value of our homes may decrease if a GSE becomes troubled.
Many pension funds, mutual funds
and money market funds include Fannie Mae securities. Hence,
the retirement savings of many Americans and global
citizens, as well as the resources of global financial
institutions, are now vested in Fannie Mae's well being.
If government resources are called
upon to forestall or support Fannie Mae in a bankruptcy or
reorganization, our tax dollars and taxpayer-backed
government credit could be diverted to fund Fannie Mae's
liabilities and to subsidize the US mortgage markets.
If one GSE is troubled, it could
impact the viability and health of the others, including
Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan Bank System, as well
as Ginnie Mae, a governmental corporation at the Department
of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
The following questions, organized around
Judge Sporkin's historical areas of responsibility, are intended to
illuminate the background and experience that Judge Sporkin brings
to the task of assisting the Bush Administration in the oversight
and regulation of Fannie Mae. This information should be useful to
investors in US mortgage securities who are assessing credit ratings
and pricings of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, FHFB, Ginnie Mae and other
related mortgage and homebuilding stocks, bonds and derivatives or
the investment, mutual funds, pension funds and money market funds
that hold them. Here are selected
questions from the page:
Question #4: Why are Fannie Mae and HUD still using the same
auditor?
If the Bush Administration and the
Office of Federal Housing Oversight believe that Fannie Mae's
books have not been properly maintained, why do the Department
of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and other agencies of the
US government use the same firm, KPMG, as an auditor and
contractor?
Question #5: Is partisan politics
involved in the regulation of Fannie Mae?
Fannie Mae has traditionally been
viewed as a Democratic stronghold. The current CEO, Franklin
Raines was the head of Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
during the Clinton Administration. The prior CEO, Jim Johnson
was equally involved in Democratic administrations and
campaigns. A Washington Post report describes Fannie Mae's
recent encounter with its regulators and Judge Sporkin as
follows:
"As Washington donnybrooks
go, it doesn't get any bigger than this. The company,
housing lender Fannie Mae, is the biggest in the region,
with nearly $1 trillion in assets and gobs of outstanding
debt held by pension funds and banks and even foreign
central banks, all of which crave its implicit U.S.
government guarantee. Its executive suite and board of
directors are packed with the politically well connected,
while its lobbying muscle is so formidable it has been able
to fend off a concerted effort to rein in its growth and
profitability by the White House, the Federal Reserve and
the Republican leadership on Capitol Hill.
But now Fannie is reeling.
A stinging report issued by its once-obscure regulator, the
Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, alleged that
top Fannie executives manipulated accounts to inflate and
smooth earnings in an effort to boost the stock price and
earn big bonuses. The regulator accuses the company of
having lax internal controls and insufficient capital to
back up its massive financial risk-taking, while ignoring
the warning of a whistle-blowing employee no longer on the
payroll. The report, prepared by Deloitte & Touche and
Stanley Sporkin, a longtime enforcement director at the
Securities and Exchange Commission, has now prompted
criminal and civil probes by the Justice Department and the
SEC."
Do recent actions by the Bush
Administration regarding Fannie Mae relate to the current
Presidential election and the role of the mortgage and
homebuilding industry to campaign fund raising and manipulation
of the mortgage markets? When viewed through the lens of
"economic warfare," does the recent agreement negotiated between
OFHEO and Fannie Mae give Republican interests extraordinary
powers to micromanage Fannie Mae and members of the mortgage
banking industry for political purposes?
Question #2:
Why did you suppress Community Wizard?
In
early March 1998, in your capacity as US Federal District Judge,
you approved the court takeover of Hamilton Securities office,
during which Hamilton's software tools and databases – including
their Community Wizard system – were destroyed and/or seized by
the court, and related decisions by you ensured that the
Department of Justice was able to seize monies owed to Hamilton.
The databases, destroyed or removed from the Internet until many
years later, included the maps of high defaults on HUD mortgages
in areas targeted by alleged CIA narcotics trafficking,
including South Central LA.
For example, the
following map was generated using Community Wizard, a software
system providing communities with important financial
information about their place:
If indeed there are elements
working to destroy America's sovereignty so that power for the
New World Order is centered in
Europe where the money is, and we are truly in the 70th week of
Daniel as the
HIStory, Our Future Bible studies seem
to point to, then the crashing of the American economy is a big step
to being owned by foreign interests on top of ceding legal authority
to international law coming from Europe. Did you know that all of
our payroll taxes pay the interest to European and international
banks? That's free money automatically siphoned from the US and
given to those behind the control leading to the New World Order!
We're paying for their plans whether we like it or not. This is the
power they wield over the thoughts and minds of the people unaware
of the Truth. I also believe they are expecting a revolt from the
awareness of this to help depopulate the planet, a stated goal of
the New World Order. I don't plan on giving them that pleasure and
neither should any of us. Knowing what is coming, we should focus on
preaching the Gospel to those with ears to hear because no matter
what we do, the wicked will run this world until Christ returns to
take the kingdoms. Our concern should be for the individual souls
yet blinded to Truth and reality.
“I
never would have agreed to the formulation of the Central
Intelligence Agency back in '47, if I had known it would
become the American Gestapo.”
| Harry S Truman, 1961
"PAO [Public Affairs
Office] now has relationships with reporters from every major wire service,
newspaper, news weekly, and television network in the nation. This has helped
us turn some intelligence failure stories into intelligence success stories,
and it has contributed to the accuracy of countless others. In many instances,
we have persuaded reporters to postpone, change, hold, or even scrap stories
that could have adversely affected national security interests or jeopardized
sources and methods."
“We are grateful to the
Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other publications whose
directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion
for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan
for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during
those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march
towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual
elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National auto-determination
practiced in past centuries” | David
Rockefeller in an address to Trilateral Commission meeting, 1991
“Techniques
such as Genetic engineering, Psychoactive drugs and electronic
control of the brain make possible a transformation of the
species into docile, fully-obedient, 'safe' organisms.”
| William Sims Bainbridge,
'Religions for a Galactic Civilization' paper given at the 19th
Goddard Memorial Symposium of the
American Astronomical Society, Pentagon City, Virginia,
March 26~27, 1981. As Deputy Director of The
National Science Foundation, has received from GW Bush $800
million in funding.
Crack the CIA -
Tracking the
covert history of CIA drug smuggling from Nicaragua to Arkansas and
South Central Los Angeles, GNN sheds light on the darkest secret of
the Agency's operational directorate. Cut to the ambient Hip Hop
loops of DJ Trek-e, Crack The CIA features explosive footage of Mike
Ruppert's historical televised confrontation with CIA Director John
Deutch. Don't blink!
One of challenges of doing the numbers
on the narcotics business is that narcotics are not always a
commodity -- sometimes narcotics are a currency used to pay for
other things. The arms industry sometimes markets to third world
countries, or groups such as terrorists, who cannot pay with
cash, but can pay with drugs. So, for example, it is not unusual
to see arms-drugs transshipment operations, in which payment for
arms is taken with drugs and then the drugs retailed in the US
to facilitate the arms trading and profits. A case in point is
the Iran-Contra operation at Mena, Arkansas. It has been alleged
that Oliver North and the White House (National Security
Council) were dealing drugs through Mena not to make money, but
to facilitate arms shipments. Mena has received attention as a
result of its alleged financial contribution to Bill and Hillary
Clinton's rise to national prominence. You also see the
arms-drugs relationship as you estimate how the money works on
the private profits from various taxpayer funded wars. Vietnam,
Kosovo, Plan Colombia, Afghanistan, what do they all have in
common? Drugs, oil and gas, arms. Add gold, currency and bank
market share and you have the top of my checklist for
understanding how the money works on any war or "low intensity
conflict" around the globe. Many of the members of our global
leadership were trained in wartime narcotics trafficking in Asia
during WWII. George H. W. Bush and his generation watched our
ally Chang Kai Shek finance his army and covert operations with
opium. I am told that the Flying Tigers were the model that
taught Air America how to fly dope. If you trace back the
history of the family and family networks of America's leaders
and numerous other leaders around the world, what you will find
is that narcotics and arms trafficking are a multigenerational
theme that has criss-crossed through Asia, North America,
Europe, Latin America and Eurasia and back through the City of
London and Wall Street to the great pools of financial capital.
Many a great American and British fortune got going in the
Chinese opium trade. One of the benefits of learning how narco
dollars work is that it will help you sort through the money
laundering and insider trading news on the War on Terrorism.
Terrorism and narcotics trafficking often get linked through
narcotics as currency. Terrorists need guns. Narco dollars need
private protection and covert operations.
The National Security Council's
Double Bind in 1996
Here
is the acid test. It's August 1996. Gary Webb has just broken
the story in the San Jose Mercury News about the CIA helping to
deal drugs into South Central LA. He has put the legal documents
up on their website. The proof is hard. The government is
dealing drugs. Catherine Austin Fitts's company is publishing a
tool on the web called Community Wizard that shows maps with
Geographic Information Systems software that include patterns of
defaults on HUD mortgages in the areas of LA with the heaviest
concentration of CIA supported Iran Contra drug trafficking. The
patterns between HUD defaulted mortgages and narco dollars are
much too close for comfort. What would you do if you were Bob
Rubin (Secretary of Treasury, now Co-Chairman of Citicorp),
Larry Summers (Deputy Secretary of Treasury, now President of
Harvard), John Hawke (Undersecretary of the Treasury; now
Comptroller of the Currency), Al Gore (Vice President, now
teaching) and John Deutch (Director of the CIA, now teaching)
sitting on the national security council or the related narco
dollars task force? Would you target Webb and get him fired and
the story discredited or would you let the story grow and
flourish? Would you target Fitts and have her business and her
software tools and databases destroyed or would you let her
business flourish, allowing every community to see and track the
narco dollars that were helping to drive their Solari Index to
0% while driving the Dow Jones Index higher? Which will it be in
an election year? Will you do everything you can do to attract
the reinvestment of the narco dollars into your campaign and
into the stock market or will you let Fitts and Webb continue to
illuminate "how the money works" on narco dollars in a way that
might crash the stock market and make it harder and more
expensive for the government to finance the deficit? Before you
answer, let me tell you one more story.
In 1999, I was at a
revival for Christian women. One of the presidential candidates
made a guest appearance. A friend of mine, an Afro-American
minister, who used to work for the Drug Enforcement Agency
(DEA), leapt to her feet to applaud him with tremendous
enthusiasm. I was surprised at her response given that she
understood his success in attracting narco dollars - not to
mention his and his colleague's silence on Gary Webb's Dark
Alliance reports and the subsequent CIA admission of drug
dealing by the government. She looked at me and said, "He is
going to be the winner." So I said, "You mean, I am a loser
because I tried to stop the corruption and he is a winner
because he profited from it and helped it grow. So you will clap
for him and not for me." She replied, "That's right. You are a
loser. He is a winner" Not such an easy decision to vote for the
"rule of law" is it? Indeed, Webb got fired and Fitts' was
targeted and, after spending $6 million on legal and related
expenses, my fortune sank down to the same 0% as the Solari
Index. But whatever I do, I can't blame it just on the top guys.
Whatever they did, whoever it was, they were doing what it took
to please and win the crowd. Americans love a winner. more...
"If the people knew
what we had done, they would chase us down the street and lynch us." |
President George H. W. Bush, to journalist
Sarah McClendon, December 1992, in response to the question, "What will
the people do if they ever find out the truth about Iraq-gate and Iran
contra?" Link
Wikipedia: The Iran-Contra Affair was a political scandal
occurring in 1987 as a result of earlier events during the Reagan
administration in which members of the executive branch sold weapons
to Iran, an avowed enemy, and illegally used the profits to continue
funding anti-Sandinista rebels, the Contras, in Nicaragua.[1]
Large volumes of documents relating to the scandal were destroyed or
withheld from investigators by Reagan administration officials.[2][3] The affair is still shrouded in secrecy. After the arms
sales were revealed in November 1986, President Ronald Reagan
appeared on national television and denied that they had occurred.[4]
A week later, however, on November 13, Reagan returned to the
airwaves to affirm that weapons were indeed transferred to Iran. He
denied that they were part of an exchange for hostages.[5]
President Reagan appeared before the Tower
Commission on
December 2,
1986, to answer questions. His answers were not
entirely consistent, and he was (allegedly) plagued
with poor memory, because the questions were
regarding details that occurred months and years
prior. It was also said that during the time in
question he was almost constantly using heavy pain
medications.
[12]
The
report published by the Tower Commission, known as
the Tower Commission Report, was delivered to the
President on
February 26,
1987. It criticized the actions of Oliver North,
John Poindexter,
Defense SecretaryCaspar Weinberger and others. It did not
determine that the President had knowledge of the
extent of the program, although it argued that the
President ought to have had better control of the
National Security Council staff. The wording of the
report surprised some since it was expected to have
been weak in its criticism of the President.
Instead, it heavily criticized President Reagan for
not properly supervising his subordinates or being
aware of their actions. The U.S. Congress issued its
own report on
November 18,
1987, indicating that "If the president did not
know what his national security advisers were doing,
he should have."
[2]" The congressional report stated that the
President bore "ultimate responsibility" for
wrongdoing by his aides, and his Administration
exhibited "secrecy, deception and disdain for the
law." A major result of the Tower Commission was the
consensus that Reagan should have listened to his
National Security Advisor more, thereby placing more
power in the hands of that chair. The National
Security Advisor was to be seen as an "honest
broker" and not someone who would use the position
to further his or her political agenda.
Some doubted the intentions of the Tower
Commission and believed that it was a political
stunt. The commission had limited its criticism of
Vice President
George H.W. Bush. Subsequently, the head of the
commission,
John Tower, was nominated to the position of
Secretary of Defense by Bush when he became
President. He was not confirmed by the Senate. Some
Democrats used the nomination to retaliate against
President George H.W. Bush for what they viewed as
'negative' (though successful) campaign tactics
against their nominee,
Michael Dukakis. Others, including the
conservative organizer
Paul Weyrich, accused Tower (accurately, the
evidence suggests) of having been involved in
extramarital affairs and heavy drinking. One of
Tower's leading critics was Senate Armed Services
Committee Chairman
Sam Nunn, a
Georgia Democrat.
Brent Scowcroft was named
National Security Advisor.[27]
Faced with undeniable evidence of his involvement in the scandal,
Reagan expressed regret regarding the situation at a nationally
televised White House press conference on Ash Wednesday, March 4,
1987. Responding to questions, Reagan stated that his previous
assertions that the U.S. did not trade arms for hostages were
incorrect. He also stated that the Vice President knew of the plan.
Domestically, the scandal precipitated tarnished President Reagans
popularity as his approval ratings saw "the largest single drop for
any U.S. president in history", from 67% to 46% in November 1986,
according to a New York Times/CBS News poll[29]
Reagan survived the scandal however and by December 1988 Gallup poll
"recording a 63% approval rating."[30]
Internationally the damage was more severe. The scandal
"completely discredited the U.S.-led campaign against international
terrorism, undermining previous and current efforts by its allies,"
stay steadfast to a "no negotiations, no concessions", policy on
terrorism.
“According
to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen
began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded
Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979.”
|
Zbigniew Brzezinski, United States
National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter from 1977 to
1981.
Bin
Laden comes home to roost
MSNBC (August 24,
1998) - At the CIA, it happens often enough to have a code
name: Blowback. Simply defined, this is the term that describes an
agent, an operative or an operation that has turned on its creators.
Osama bin Laden, our new public enemy Number 1, is the
personification of blowback. And the fact that he is viewed as a
hero by millions in the Islamic world proves again the old adage:
Reap what you sow. Before up click on my face and call me naive, let
me concede some points. Yes, the West needed Josef Stalin to defeat
Hitler. Yes, there were times during the Cold War when supporting
one villain (Cambodia’s Lon Nol, for instance) would have been
better than the alternative (Pol Pot). So yes, there are times when
any nation must hold its nose and shake hands with the devil for the
long-term good of the planet. But just as surely, there are times
when the United States, faced with such moral dilemmas, should have
resisted the temptation to act. Arming a multi-national coalition of
Islamic extremists in Afghanistan during the 1980s - well after the
destruction of the Marine barracks in Beirut or the hijacking of TWA
Flight 847 - was one of those times. BIN LADEN’S BEGINNINGS As anyone who has bothered to read this
far certainly knows by now, bin Laden is the heir to Saudi construction fortune
who, at least since the early 1990s, has used that money to finance countless
attacks on U.S. interests and those of its Arab allies around the world. As his
unclassified CIA biography states, bin Laden left Saudi Arabia to fight the
Soviet army in Afghanistan after Moscow’s invasion in 1979. By 1984, he was
running a front organization known as Maktab al-Khidamar - the MAK - which
funneled money, arms and fighters from the outside world into the Afghan war.
What the CIA bio conveniently fails to specify (in its unclassified form, at
least) is that the MAK was nurtured by Pakistan’s state security services, the
Inter-Services Intelligence agency, or ISI, the CIA’s primary conduit for
conducting the covert war against Moscow’s occupation. By no means was Osama bin
Laden the leader of Afghanistan’s mujahedeen. His money gave him undue
prominence in the Afghan struggle, but the vast majority of those who fought and
died for Afghanistan’s freedom - like the Taliban regime that now holds sway
over most of that tortured nation - were Afghan nationals. Yet the CIA,
concerned about the factionalism of Afghanistan made famous by Rudyard Kipling,
found that Arab zealots who flocked to aid the Afghans were easier to “read”
than the rivalry-ridden natives. While the Arab volunteers might well prove
troublesome later, the agency reasoned, they at least were one-dimensionally
anti-Soviet for now. So bin Laden, along with a small group of Islamic militants
from Egypt, Pakistan, Lebanon, Syria and Palestinian refugee camps all over the
Middle East, became the “reliable” partners of the CIA in its war against
Moscow. more...
“Overall,
the U.S. government looked favorably on the Arab recruitment
drives. ... Some of the most ardent cold warriors at
[CIA headquarters at]
Langley thought this program should be
formally endorsed and extended. ...
[T]he CIA
"examined ways to increase their participation, perhaps in the
form of some sort of international brigade," ... Robert Gates
[then-head of the CIA's Directorate
of Intelligence] recalled. ... At
the Islamabad station Milt Bearden felt that bin Laden himself
"actually did some very good things" ... But nothing came of it
...”
| Steve Coll, Ghost Wars
(Penguin, 2005 edn), pp.145-6, 155-6.
Terror 'blowback' burns CIA
Independent on Sunday
(November 1, 1998) - THE CENTRAL Intelligence Agency has its
own argot for describing the hallucinatory world within which its
employees move. None of its esoteric terms are more euphemistic than
'blowback', the term coined to describe operations which end up
rebounding against their creators. But as the Americans slowly
unravel the international network surrounding Osama bin Laden, the
man they blame for the embassy bombings in Nairobi and Dar es
Salaam, 'blowback' is exactly what they are finding. Last week, it
was revealed that one of those under arrest is a former Egyptian
soldier named Ali Mohamed, who is alleged to have provided training
and assistance to Mr Bin Laden's operatives. Yet Mr Mohamed, it is
clear from his record, was working for the US government at the time
he provided the training: he was a Green Beret, part of America's
Special Forces. Mr Mohamed's arrest seems to be part of a pattern,
as the US slowly moves towards the realisation that many of those
now arrayed against it with Mr bin Laden were once its allies in the
war in Afghanistan. The two sides turned against each other as the
war in Afghanistan unwound, and America, not Russia, came to be seen
as the enemy. The US poured cash into Afghanistan throughout the
1980s in an effort to defeat — or at least tie down — the Russians.
Its principal ally was Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, a ferociously
anti-communist and militant Islamist leader. The US and Saudi Arabia
both sent about $500m (£300m) annually between 1986 and 1989 to fund
the mujahedin, and other rich individuals from the Gulf — including
bin Laden — spent an extra $20m every month. The US funded the
construction of the camps at Khost which it attacked two months ago
in response to the embassy bombs. It had already been known that in
those days, the US and Mr bin Laden were on the same side, but it
now it now appears that America may actually have aided Mr bin
Laden's organisation and even trained some of those who it now
contends are 'terrorists'. Mr Ali Mohamed may be the missing link.
It had already been known that in 1989, Mr Ali came to the New York
area to train mujahedin on their way to Afghanistan. Those visits
have put him in the spotlight once before: among those he trained
was El Sayyid Nosair, who was jailed in 1995 for killing Rabbi Meir
Kahane, leader of the Jewish Defence League, and, along with several
others, with plotting to blow up several New York landmarks. At his
trial, Mr Nosair claimed that the reason he had military manuals was
that he was being trained by the US, not because he was intent on
terrorism. It is uncertain whether Mr Mohammed came to New York on
official business, but for some of the trips, he was a serving US
Special Forces' sergeant. Mr Mohamed met the man at the Al-Kifah
Refugee Centre in Brooklyn's Atlantic Avenue, a place of pivotal
importance to Operation Cyclone, the American effort to support the
mujahedin. The Al-Kifah Centre and the associated Afghan Refugee
Service Inc were raising funds and, crucially, providing recruits
for the struggle, with active American assistance. The other end of
the pipeline was in Peshawar, where the Services Office co-ordinated
the transit of people, equipment and cash to the mujahedin, and to
Mr Hekmatyar' in particular. The Services Office was run by Abdulla
Azzam, a colleague of, and influence on, Osama bin Laden, and was
part of Mr bin Laden's effort to back the mujahedin. Both the
Services office and Al-Kifah were also linked to Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman,
an Egyptian religious leader later jailed for the planned New York
bombings. The US took a benign view of this at the time. The
operation was, after all, assisting in the fight against Communism.
As Mr Mohamed's presence showed, those associated with the US
military were providing assistance to Al-Kifah. The recruits
received brief paramilitary training and weapons instruction in the
New York area, according to evidence in earlier trials, before being
sent to fight with Mr Hekmatyar. Even Sheikh Abdel-Rahman had,
apparently, entered the US with the full knowledge of the CIA in
1990. But by the mid-1990s, America's view of Al-Kifah had changed.
It discovered that several of those charged with the World Trade
Centre bombing and the New York landmarks bombings were former
Afghan veterans, recruited through the Brooklyn-based organisation.
Many of those the US had trained and recruited for a war were still
fighting: but now it was against America. A confidential CIA
internal survey concluded that it was 'partly culpable' for the
World Trade Centre bomb, according to reports of the time. There had
been blowback. How and why did the people behind Al-Kifah turn
against America? The US cut off funding in 1991 to Mr Hekmatyar,
both because the Russians had withdrawn from Afghanistan and because
it had at last started to realise that backing Islamic
fundamentalism was perhaps not the brightest idea the CIA had ever
hatched. America had also gone to war against Iraq in 1991, and
stationed troops in Saudi Arabia, outraging Mr bin Laden and other
devout Muslims. There also seems to have been a huge disagreement
over Bosnia. In December 1992, a US army official met one of the
Afghan veterans from Al-Kifah and offered help with a covert
operation to support the Muslims in Bosnia, funded with Saudi money,
according to one of those jailed for assisting with the New York
bombings. But that effort quickly disintegrated, leaving a great
deal of bad feeling. There are probably only three people outside
the US government who ever knew exactly what role the Al-Kifah
refugee centre really played, and how far the US helped to build up
Mr bin Laden's organisation. One was Mr Azzam, the charismatic
Palestinian who ran the Peshawar operation. He was killed by a car
bomb in 1989. The second was Mustafa Shalabi, who ran Al-Kifah. He
was murdered in 1991. The third is Osama bin Laden, and he is not
telling. And the US government is certainly not about to explain
whether it helped create what it now refers to as Public Enemy
Number One.
The Secret Government: The Constitution In Crisis
- This is the full length version of Bill Moyer's 1987 scathing
critique of the criminal subterfuge carried out by the Executive
Branch of the United States Government to carry out operations which
are clearly contrary to the wishes and values of the American
people. The ability to exercise this power with impunity is
facilitated by the National Security Act of 1947. The thrust of the
exposé is the Iran-Contra arms and drug-running operations which
flooded the streets of our nation with crack cocaine.
Debbie Schlussel
- She had some
amazing insights into Islam's current invasion of America and our bowing down to avowed
terrorists. She personally visited US mosques and spoke about that experience
among others.
Daily
Jot News Service (September 19, 2007) - Islam
is using First Amendment guarantees of freedom of religion to
implement a strategic plan to eliminate and destroy the United
States of America, according to an analysis of documents submitted
by the government as evidence in the Dallas, Texas Holy Land
Foundation terror trial. A strategic planning document for North
America written by the Muslim Brotherhood in May 1991 indicates that
Islam’s plan is well under way to “settle” the United States by
possessing “a mastery of the art of “coalitions,” the art of
“absorption” and the principles of “cooperation.”” The plan, already
16 years in implementation, identifies eight historical stages of
development that the Muslim Brotherhood in America already had
accomplished by the plan’s introduction in 1991.
Dallas
Morning News (September 17,
2007) - Amid
the mountain of evidence released in the Holy Land Foundation
terrorism financing trial, the most provocative has turned out to be
a handful of previously classified evidence detailing Islamist
extremists' ambitious plans for a U.S. takeover.
(May
22, 2006) - Nearly four years after the attacks of 9/11,
many Americans appear to be growing weary of terror alerts and the
ever-clanging bell of possible terror strikes within the U.S. Many otherwise
sensible and astute Americans are beginning to openly question not only the
effectiveness of our sworn enemy who stuck us on 9/11 and numerous times
previous, but their future intentions as well. The dynamics of the
asymmetrical warfare in which we are engaged are numerous, and the causes of
the general malaise regarding terrorism sweeping across America are equally
abundant. This report does not intend to address either aspect of these
perilous inclinations, but will be a primer that will effectively illustrate
that the United States has been and continues to serve as a training ground
for future attacks within this country. more...
(May
25, 2005) - A training camp linked to Islamic militants
has been operating in Alabama, and European law enforcement officials believe
Muslim extremists were using it to prepare for a holy war. British authorities
also thought that militants from overseas were training in the United States
to take advantage of America's gun laws, sources told ABC NEWS. The looming
question for law enforcement is whether there is a connection between the camp
and the al Qaeda terror network. An investigation by Britain's Scotland Yard led to the discovery of the camp
in Marion, Ala. The facility is called "Ground Zero USA." Bullet-riddled
police cars and a school bus with mannequin targets are scattered around the
property. Inside a huge shed is an equally macabre scene - shot-up mannequins,
male and female, in domestic settings, some with red, blood-like stains on
them.more...
-
Several years ago a startling documentary video was
produced by journalist Steven Emerson called JIHAD IN AMERICA. At the time
this documentary on jihad went relatively unnoticed by most Americans.
However, even if we had seen the documentary, the fact is that most of us
would not have wanted to believe it. "Jihad in America" won the prestigious
George Polk Award. It was also named the "best investigative reporting in
print, broadcast or book" by the Investigative Reporters and Editors
Organization. It won the National Headliner Award and the Chris Award as well.
In JIHAD IN AMERICA, Emerson discloses with incredible video documentation how
the leaders of the Islamic fundamentalist movements such as Hisbollah and
Hamas have set up numerous facilities across the United States with the clear
intent of carrying out three main objectives;
1- The collapse of American will.
2- The disintegration of the American way of life.
3- The death of all Jews, Christians and moderate Muslims who stand in the way
of Islam.
Now, after September 11th 2001, the fact that the Islamic fundamentalists have
waged a war of terrorism against the United States and the western civilized
world has come home to roost. We have been shaken at the core and rudely
awakened to the shocking reality of JIHAD IN AMERICA. What follows is a list
of the frightening information found in Emerson's documentary, JIHAD IN
AMERICA. Shocking indeed!more...
Warnings of nuclear attacks by terrorists - This page has a collection
of articles from the past regarding "suitcase nukes" reportedly already
smuggled into the United States awaiting the call to detonate them. The claim
is that they were smuggled in before 9/11 and so the security situation didn't
catch them coming across the border and through the cargo ships. I don't know
if this is true or not, but it's worth keeping in mind. They no doubt would
love to destroy America in this way. And even if they only hit a couple
cities, the financial effects nationwide would possibly cause the collapse of
America's already fragile economy. Not only that, but we would have no entity
to respond to as these terrorists are attached to a religious ideology and not
any particular nation-state.
This page is to highlight information and ideas
brought to my attention regarding the illegal immigrant problem our nation is
facing. As a Christian, I care about the situation of the immigrant, but I
also believe in rule of law in a society and fairness to those who do obey
laws to come into the USA legally. I understand that it's not a fun process,
that's the downside of bureaucracy. I try to remain as far from that as
possible myself.
From a watchman's viewpoint, taking what I've learned
from the
HIStory,
Our Future Bible studies and
what I've learned of Bible prophecy in my search for Truth, I think that
this is the natural course of events for the fulfillment of Bible prophecy.
Ultimately, the sovereignty of every nation must be eroded to the point that
the majority of the citizenry will desire globalization. I believe those
holding the power in our nation are allowing the widespread immigration
because it's part of the plan to bring the world together under one government
to be headed by one man who is given power from Lucifer. The
history of the mystery of iniquity goes into some of how this has come
about under the radar of most of the world. There are wicked people serving
Lucifer in high places. Remember Lucifer offered Christ the kingdoms of this
world, but Christ rebuked him. Another will come, the antithesis of Christ,
who will take Lucifer up on that offer.
After that article is another about the decline of a
nation. Look around and tell me this isn't happening now. It's been happening
slowly over generations so that each successive generation is more and more
oblivious to what is happening. It's given the buzz-word "conspiracy theory"
and the majority of people in the world go, "Ok, never mind then, that's all
just crazy talk." The Bible makes it clear.
Ephesians 6:10-20 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his
might. Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against
the wiles of the devil. For we wrestle not against flesh and
blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the
rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in
high places. Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that
ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.
Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the
breastplate of righteousness; And your feet shod with the preparation of the
gospel of peace; Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall
be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked. And take the helmet of
salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God: Praying
always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching
thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints; And for me,
that utterance may be given unto me, that I may open my mouth boldly, to
make known the mystery of the gospel, For which I am an ambassador in bonds:
that therein I may speak boldly, as I ought to speak.
Thought is the
voice of the spirit realm. It is not perceived with our five senses, but
it is always there. It's what we get when we watch TV. It's what we get when
we watch movies. Ideas can spread like wildfire, yet go unseen until given a
voice. They are not bound by time as long as they are preserved in words. The
Bible is God's Word preserved through history for our benefit. The world is
listening less and less to God's Word though and are relying on men. The
perspective of Lucifer is that if chaos can bring the world to its knees, one
who seems the perfect man can provide salvation from this chaos. The same
puppeteer is behind all the characters. He plays Islam off the
de-spiritualized Western world.
Ideas planted in a holy book provide no rest as
hatred, revenge, and spite mixed with religious fervor combine in an explosive
combination that ends with men, women, and children willingly killing
themselves and others in an attempt to take over the world for their moon god.
As it is with Christians, those who don't obey their holy books, don't imitate
their God and therefore should not call themselves by His name.
Understand Islam and
what the Koran teaches as well as
its history and you too will have your eyes opened.
Then
understand Western civilization's history and the
secret plans that are coming to light the more
they are implemented. The world comes against Christ when He returns.
Those in power are working behind the veil, given power by the same spirit
that controls things like the media, which feed us the information we use to
make decisions. Now what if the spirit of darkness could control what people
know? He could give cover to his minions who he is speaking thoughts to. There
are many in powerful positions who are part of secret societies that have
practices associated with the dark arts. Nobody knows all the things that go
on behind those closed doors, but Bible prophecy reveals the end result of it.
The antichrist will conquer by peace, speaking flatteries. To the brainwashed
and blinded world, he will be their hero. To those who have opened their eyes,
he will cause trembling. And to those who have accepted Christ, they will know
Yeshua wins in the end.
Lucifer has the chaos of Islam dangling in one hand,
while the power center of the new world order is dangling from the other. The
audience sits mesmerized by the marionette show being played out before them,
hoping for the best. When Lucifer stops moving the Islamic hand in
coordination with the head of the new world order working his political magic,
the world will cheer him on and congratulate each other. Then, suddenly the
whole stage will lift and the dragon will be seen giving his power to the head
of the new world order, the
revived Roman Empire. From this point on, the audience either worships the
marionette and his master or they die.
Back to our current time at the beginning of this
prophesied end, I have a feeling the end result of the immigration issue will
be the downfall of America. In fact, I believe its already here. We've
outsourced our jobs and products overseas and the media have mesmerized the
nation, feeding them exactly what they need to swallow what is coming and turn
from God. So on an individual level, I desire everyone to have the freedoms I
do, but I think those freedoms are about to be taken away because I'm not
going to go along with the plans of this world and am certainly never going to
turn from my Savior Yeshua the Christ.
Glenn Beck -- Cohen & Grigsby Seminar (H1B
Visa Program Loopholes)
Can a new film help derail the current push for
amnesty for illegal aliens? Chris Burgard's new movie "Border" is so
good that it could dramatically affect the public debate. But because
you can't expect the major media to cover this shocking and poignant
film, the challenge will be to make sure millions of Americans get a
chance to see it. It tells the story of a war - a war just as important,
if not more so, than the one in Iraq.
On April 23, 2007, as part of the Hold Their Feet to the Fire rally of
2007, an event designed to pressure the U.S. Government to protect and
defend our borders, the Federation for American Immigration Reform held
a screening of "Border" at the Union Station Phoenix Theatre in
Washington D.C. At the screening, the courageous director, Chris
Burgard, spoke, and national radio talk-show host G. Gordon Liddy
delivered the opening remarks.
Before the movie began, Burgard told the capacity crowd that it took two
years to make the film, and that he drew his inspiration to produce the
documentary from reading Liddy's book, "Fight Back!: Tackling Terrorism
Liddy Style." Burgard told the audience that Liddy's book provided him
with the confidence to believe that citizens can fight back against
their government and win. He funded the entire film out of his own
pocket.
Removal of prayer from schools and removal of Christian symbols from public view
Psalm 33:12
Blessed is the nation whose God is the
LORD…
James 5:16
The effective, fervent prayer of a
righteous man avails much.
1 Timothy 2:1-2 Therefore I exhort first of all that…
prayer… be made for… all who are in authority, that we may lead a quiet and
peaceable life in all godliness and reverence.
Socialism
2 Corinthians 9:7 Each man should give what he has
decided in his heart to give, not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God
loves a cheerful giver.
2 Thessalonians
3:10 For even when we were with you, we
gave you this rule: If a man will not work, he shall not eat.
John 12:3-8
Then Mary took a pound of very costly
oil of spikenard, anointed the feet of Jesus, and wiped His feet with her
hair. And the house was filled with the fragrance of the oil. Then one of His
disciples, Judas Iscariot, Simon's son, who would betray Him, said, Why was
this fragrant oil not sold for three hundred denarii and given to the poor?
This he said, not that he cared for the poor, but because he was a thief, and
had the money box; and he used to take what was put in it. Then Jesus said,
Let her alone; she has kept this for the day of My burial. For the poor you
have with you always, but Me you do not have always.
Isaiah 5:20
Woe to those who call evil good and
good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter
for sweet and sweet for bitter.
Peter 2:16
Live as free men, but do not use your
freedom as a cover-up for evil.
Be not overcome
of evil, but overcome evil with good. Romans 12:21
Watchman Bible Study | 2005 - 2010 Site Map
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section
107, any copyrighted work herein is archived under
fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in reviewing the included information for personal use, non-profit research and
educational purposes only. Ref.
In
early March 1998, in your capacity as US Federal District Judge,
you approved the court takeover of Hamilton Securities office,
during which Hamilton's software tools and databases – including
their Community Wizard system – were destroyed and/or seized by
the court, and related decisions by you ensured that the
Department of Justice was able to seize monies owed to Hamilton.
The databases, destroyed or removed from the Internet until many
years later, included the maps of high defaults on HUD mortgages
in areas targeted by alleged CIA narcotics trafficking,
including South Central LA. 
