This page is to bring together all the different stories and reports
of things in our environment, whether what we eat, breathe or drink,
that are increasingly unhealthy for the population. For the most
part I believe this is the result of greed and cutting corners to
make a buck, but at the same time,
there is a conspiracy by some to lower Earth's population for
better control and because of environmental views.
Please don't take me wrong in assuming I think everyone is in on
this. I believe that many people just trust what they are told and
sometimes scientists are just guessing and don't have full knowledge
of effects. At the same time if I can learn some of what I
would like to share here, the ones who need millions of dollars to
implement plans should know it too. I fear those whose bottom
line always stops at the dollar without regard for people. There are
people who could care less about anything but their plans. If you
don't believe that yet, then time will tell. These kinds of things
are why God's wrath is coming on the kind of people who would do
these things, even if they know something is wrong. Watch Erin
Brockovich.
When the biotech industry decides to use the lands and people of
Hawaii as its test guinea pig, local farmers, activists,
researchers, and others speak out. This excellent documentary was
made in 2006 by Na
Maka o ka Aina for
Earthjustice,
the non-profit public interest law firm, and is re-presented with
permission.
0:30:32
What's Wrong with GMOs?
By now most people know that GMO stands for Genetically Modified
Organisms. But how do GMOs affect us, the food we eat, and the
environment? Jeffrey Smith, founder of the Institute for Responsible
Technology provides a solid general overview in this interview.
0:44:09
Links
Organic Consumers Association - The Organic
Consumers Association (OCA) is an online and grassroots
non-profit 501(c)3 public interest organization campaigning for
health, justice, and sustainability. The OCA deals with crucial
issues of food safety, industrial agriculture, genetic
engineering, children's health, corporate accountability, Fair
Trade, environmental sustainability and other key topics. We are
the only organization in the US focused exclusively on promoting
the views and interests of the nation's estimated 50 million
organic and socially responsible consumers.
Study reveals signs of toxicity of GE maize approved for human
consumption Current
(July 26, 2008) - "Laboratory rats, fed with a genetically
engineered (GE) maize produced by Monsanto, have shown signs of toxicity
in kidney and liver, according to a new study.(1) This is the first time
that a GE product which has been cleared for use as food for humans and
animals has shown signs of toxic effects on internal organs. The study,
published today in the journal “Archives of Environmental Contamination
and Toxicology”, analysed results of safety tests submitted by Monsanto
to the European Commission when the company was seeking authorisation to
market its GE Maize variety MON863 in the EU. (2) The data shows that
MON863 has significant health risks associated with it; nonetheless, the
European Commission granted licences to market the maize for consumption
by both humans and animals. (3) The incriminating evidence was obtained
by Greenpeace following a court case (4), and passed on for evaluation
by a team of experts headed by Professor Gilles Eric Séralini, a
governmental expert in genetic engineering technology from the
University of Caen. (5) In a joint press conference with Greenpeace at
Berlin, Professor Séralini said, “Monsanto’s analyses do not stand up to
rigorous scrutiny – to begin with, their statistical protocols are
highly questionable. Worse, the company failed to run a sufficient
analysis of the differences in animal weight. Crucial data from urine
tests were concealed in the company’s own publications.” Greenpeace is
demanding the complete and immediate withdrawal of Monsanto’s MON 863
maize from the global market and is calling upon governments to
undertake an urgent reassessment of all other authorised GE products and
a strict review of current testing methods. “This is the final nail in
the coffin for the credibility of the current authorisation system for
GE products. Once it’s known that a system designed to protect human and
animal health has approved a high-risk product despite clear evidence of
its dangers, we need to start ‘strip-searching’ all GE products on the
market, and immediately abort this flawed approval procedure,” said
Christophe Then, Genetic Engineer campaigner, Greenpeace International.
more...
"Doomsday Seed Vault" in the Arctic
Global Research
(April 1, 2008) - One thing Microsoft founder Bill Gates can’t be
accused of is sloth. He was already programming at 14, founded Microsoft
at age 20 while still a student at Harvard. By 1995 he had been listed
by Forbes as the world’s richest man from being the largest shareholder
in his Microsoft, a company which his relentless drive built into a de
facto monopoly in software systems for personal computers. In 2006 when
most people in such a situation might think of retiring to a quiet
Pacific island, Bill Gates decided to devote his energies to his Bill
and Melinda Gates Foundation, the world’s largest ‘transparent’ private
foundation as it says, with a whopping $34.6 billion endowment and a
legal necessity to spend $1.5 billion a year on charitable projects
around the world to maintain its tax free charitable status. A gift from
friend and business associate, mega-investor Warren Buffett in 2006, of
some $30 billion worth of shares in Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway put the
Gates’ foundation into the league where it spends almost the amount of
the entire annual budget of the United Nations’ World Health
Organization. So when Bill Gates decides through the Gates Foundation to
invest some $30 million of their hard earned money in a project, it is
worth looking at. No project is more interesting at the moment than a
curious project in one of the world’s most remote spots, Svalbard. Bill
Gates is investing millions in a seed bank on the Barents Sea near the
Arctic Ocean, some 1,100 kilometers from the North Pole. Svalbard is a
barren piece of rock claimed by Norway and ceded in 1925 by
international treaty (see
map). On this God-forsaken island Bill Gates is investing tens of
his millions along with the Rockefeller Foundation, Monsanto
Corporation, Syngenta Foundation and the Government of Norway, among
others, in what is called the ‘doomsday seed bank.’ Officially the
project is named the Svalbard Global Seed Vault on the Norwegian island
of Spitsbergen, part of the Svalbard island group. The seed bank is
being built inside a mountain on Spitsbergen Island near the small
village of Longyearbyen. It’s almost ready for ‘business’ according to
their releases. The bank will have dual blast-proof doors with motion
sensors, two airlocks, and walls of steel-reinforced concrete one meter
thick. It will contain up to three million different varieties of seeds
from the entire world, ‘so that crop diversity can be conserved for the
future,’ according to the Norwegian government. Seeds will be specially
wrapped to exclude moisture. There will be no full-time staff, but the
vault's relative inaccessibility will facilitate monitoring any possible
human activity. Did we miss something here? Their press release stated,
‘so that crop diversity can be conserved for the future.’ What future do
the seed bank’s sponsors foresee, that would threaten the global
availability of current seeds, almost all of which are already well
protected in designated seed banks around the world? Anytime Bill Gates,
the Rockefeller Foundation, Monsanto and Syngenta get together on a
common project, it’s worth digging a bit deeper behind the rocks on
Spitsbergen. When we do we find some fascinating things. The first
notable point is who is sponsoring the doomsday seed vault. Here joining
the Norwegians are, as noted, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; the
US agribusiness giant DuPont/Pioneer Hi-Bred, one of the world’s
largest owners of patented genetically-modified (GMO) plant seeds and
related agrichemicals; Syngenta, the Swiss-based major GMO seed
and agrichemicals company through its Syngenta Foundation; the
Rockefeller Foundation, the private group who created the “gene
revolution with over $100 million of seed money since the 1970’s;
CGIAR, the global network created by the Rockefeller Foundation to
promote its ideal of genetic purity through agriculture change.
CGIAR and ‘The Project’ As I detailled in the book, Seeds of
Destruction, in 1960 the Rockefeller Foundation, John D. Rockefeller
III’s Agriculture Development Council and the Ford Foundation joined
forces to create the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) in Los
Baños, the Philippines.1 By 1971, the Rockefeller Foundation’s IRRI,
along with their Mexico-based International Maize and Wheat Improvement
Center and two other Rockefeller and Ford Foundation-created
international research centers, the IITA for tropical agriculture,
Nigeria, and IRRI for rice, Philippines, combined to form a global
Consultative Group on International Agriculture Research (CGIAR). CGIAR
was shaped at a series of private conferences held at the Rockefeller
Foundation’s conference center in Bellagio, Italy. Key participants at
the Bellagio talks were the Rockefeller Foundation’s George Harrar, Ford
Foundation’s Forrest Hill, Robert McNamara of the World Bank and Maurice
Strong, the Rockefeller family’s international environmental organizer,
who, as a Rockefeller Foundation Trustee, organized the UN Earth Summit
in Stockholm in 1972. It was part of the foundation’s decades long
focus to turn science to the service of eugenics, a hideous version of
racial purity, what has been called The Project. To ensure maximum
impact, CGIAR drew in the United Nations’ Food and Agriculture
Organization, the UN Development Program and the World Bank. Thus,
through a carefully-planned leverage of its initial funds, the
Rockefeller Foundation by the beginning of the 1970’s was in a position
to shape global agriculture policy. And shape it did. Financed by
generous Rockefeller and Ford Foundation study grants, CGIAR saw to it
that leading Third World agriculture scientists and agronomists were
brought to the US to ‘master’ the concepts of modern agribusiness
production, in order to carry it back to their homeland. In the process
they created an invaluable network of influence for US agribusiness
promotion in those countries, most especially promotion of the GMO ‘Gene
Revolution’ in developing countries, all in the name of science and
efficient, free market agriculture. Genetically engineering a master
race? Now the Svalbard Seed Bank begins to become interesting. But
it gets better. ‘The Project’ I referred to is the project of the
Rockefeller Foundation and powerful financial interests since the 1920’s
to use eugenics, later renamed genetics, to justify creation of a
genetically-engineered Master Race. Hitler and the Nazis called it the
Ayran Master Race. The eugenics of Hitler were financed to a major
extent by the same Rockefeller Foundation which today is building a
doomsday seed vault to preserve samples of every seed on our planet. Now
this is getting really intriguing. The same Rockefeller Foundation
created the pseudo-science discipline of molecular biology in their
relentless pursuit of reducing human life down to the ‘defining gene
sequence’ which, they hoped, could then be modified in order to change
human traits at will. Hitler’s eugenics scientists, many of whom were
quietly brought to the United States after the War to continue their
biological eugenics research, laid much of the groundwork of genetic
engineering of various life forms, much of it supported openly until
well into the Third Reich by Rockefeller Foundation generous grants.2
The same Rockefeller Foundation created the so-called Green Revolution,
out of a trip to Mexico in 1946 by Nelson Rockefeller and former New
Deal Secretary of Agriculture and founder of the Pioneer Hi-Bred Seed
Company, Henry Wallace. The Green Revolution purported to solve the
world hunger problem to a major degree in Mexico, India and other select
countries where Rockefeller worked. Rockefeller Foundation agronomist,
Norman Borlaug, won a Nobel Peace Prize for his work, hardly something
to boast about with the likes of
Henry
Kissinger sharing the same. In reality, as it years later emerged,
the Green Revolution was a brilliant Rockefeller family scheme to
develop a globalized agribusiness which they then could monopolize just
as they had done in the world oil industry beginning a half century
before. As Henry Kissinger declared in the 1970’s, ‘If you control the
oil you control the country; if you control food, you control the
population.’ Agribusiness and the Rockefeller Green Revolution went
hand-in-hand. They were part of a grand strategy which included
Rockefeller Foundation financing of research for the development of
genetic engineering of plants and animals a few years later. John H.
Davis had been Assistant Agriculture Secretary under President Dwight
Eisenhower in the early 1950’s. He left Washington in 1955 and went to
the Harvard Graduate School of Business, an unusual place for an
agriculture expert in those days. He had a clear strategy. In 1956,
Davis wrote an article in the Harvard Business Review in which he
declared that “the only way to solve the so-called farm problem once and
for all, and avoid cumbersome government programs, is to progress from
agriculture to agribusiness.” He knew precisely what he had in mind,
though few others had a clue back then--- a revolution in agriculture
production that would concentrate control of the food chain in corporate
multinational hands, away from the traditional family farmer.3A crucial aspect driving the interest of the Rockefeller Foundation
and US agribusiness companies was the fact that the Green Revolution was
based on proliferation of new hybrid seeds in developing markets.
One vital aspect of hybrid seeds was their lack of reproductive
capacity. Hybrids had a built in protection against multiplication.
Unlike normal open pollinated species whose seed gave yields similar
to its parents, the yield of the seed borne by hybrid plants was
significantly lower than that of the first generation. That
declining yield characteristic of hybrids meant farmers must normally
buy seed every year in order to obtain high yields. Moreover, the lower
yield of the second generation eliminated the trade in seed that was
often done by seed producers without the breeder’s authorization. It
prevented the redistribution of the commercial crop seed by middlemen.
If the large multinational seed companies were able to control the
parental seed lines in house, no competitor or farmer would be able to
produce the hybrid. The global concentration of hybrid seed patents into
a handful of giant seed companies, led by DuPont’s Pioneer Hi-Bred and
Monsanto’s Dekalb laid the ground for the later GMO seed revolution.4
In effect, the introduction of modern American agricultural technology,
chemical fertilizers and commercial hybrid seeds all made local farmers
in developing countries, particularly the larger more established ones,
dependent on foreign, mostly US agribusiness and petro-chemical company
inputs. It was a first step in what was to be a decades-long, carefully
planned process. more...
Humans & Animals
Genesis 6:1-8 And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of
the earth, and daughters were born unto them, That the sons of God saw
the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of
all which they chose. And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always
strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be a
hundred and twenty years. There were giants
[Nephilim] in the
earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in
unto the daughters of men, and they bore children to them, the same
became mighty men which were of old, men of renown. And GOD saw that the
wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of
the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. And it repented the
LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.
And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face
of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls
of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them. But Noah found
grace in the eyes of the LORD.
"When the Greek Septuagint was
created, the Hebrew word Nephilim was translated into Greek as
"gegenes." This is the same word used in Greek mythology for the
"Titans," creatures created through the interbreeding of the Greek gods
and human beings. The English words "genes" and "genetics" are built
around the same root word as gegenes, genea meaning "breed" or "kind."
Thus the choice of this word again suggests a genetic component to the
creation of these giants." (Quayle 128)
Jasher 4:18 After the fallen angels went into the daughters of men, [then]
the sons of men taught the mixture of animals of one species with the
other in order to provoke the Lord.
Enoch 7:5,6 they began to sin against birds, and beasts, and reptiles, and fish.
"Today, molecular biologists classify the functions of genes within
native species but are unsure in many cases how a gene's coding might
react from one species to another. In recombinant DNA technology, a
"transgenic" organism is created when the genetic structure of one
species is altered by the transfer of a gene or genes from another. This
could change not only the genetic structure of the modified animal and
its offspring, but its evolutionary development, sensory modalities,
disease propensity, personality, behavior traits, and more."
(Horn Nephilim Stargates 135,136)
More information on this
here. The mingling of DNA in scripture was considered a sin and
provoking the Lord. Given the information about what scientists are
tinkering with today, are we any different than during the times of
Noah?
First of all, it needs to be stated that
the 'substance' referred to as 'Fluoride' is a misnomer - there
is no such substance listed in the periodic chart of the
elements, nor in the prestigious CRC handbook, nor in the sacred
'bible' of the pharmaceutical industry - the illustrious 'Merck
Index'. Instead, we find a GAS called Fluorine - and from the
use of this gas in various industries such as aluminum
manufacturing and the nuclear industry -certain toxic byproducts
are created which have 'captured' fluorine molecules. One such
toxic, poisonous 'byproduct' is called sodium Fluoride - which
according to the Merck Index is primarily used as rat and
cockroach poison and is also the active ingredient in most
toothpastes and as an "additive to drinking water". But sadly,
there is much more to this sordid tale.
Did you know that sodium Fluoride is
also one of the basic ingredients in both PROZAC (FLUoxetene
Hydrochloride) and Sarin Nerve Gas (Isopropyl-Methyl-Phosphoryl
FLUORIDE) - (Yes, folks the same Sarin Nerve Gas that terrorists
released on a crowded Japanese subway train!). Let me repeat:
the truth the American public needs to understand is the fact
that Sodium Fluoride is nothing more (or less) than a hazardous
waste by-product of the nuclear and aluminum industries. In
addition to being the primary ingredient in rat and cockroach
poisons, it is also a main ingredient in anesthetic, hypnotic,
and psychiatric drugs as well as military NERVE GAS! Why, oh why
then is it allowed to be added to the toothpastes and drinking
water of the American people?
Historically, this substance was quite
expensive for the worlds' premier chemical companies to dispose
of - but in the 50's and 60's - Alcoa and the entire aluminum
industry - with a vast overabundance of the toxic waste -
SOMEHOW sold the FDA and our government on the insane (but
highly profitable) idea of buying this poison at a 20,000%
markup and then injecting it into our water supply as well as
into the nation's toothpastes and dental rinse. Yes that's right
folks, a 20,000% markup. Consider also that when sodium Fluoride
is injected into our drinking water, its level is approximately
1 part-per-million (ppm), but since we only drink ½ of one
percent of the total water supply, the hazardous chemical
literally 'goes down the drain' and voila - the chemical
industry has not only a free hazardous waste disposal system -
but we have also PAID them handsomely in the process!!
Independent scientific evidence over
the past 50 plus years has shown that sodium fluoride shortens
our life span, promotes various cancers and mental disturbances,
and most importantly, makes humans stupid, docile, and
subservient, all in one neat little package. There is increasing
evidence that aluminum in the brain is a causative factor in
Alzheimer's Disease, and evidence points towards sodium
fluoride's strong affinity to 'bond' with this dangerous
aluminum (remember it is a byproduct of aluminum manufacturing)
and also it has the ability to 'trick' the blood-brain barrier
by imitating the hydrogen ion thus allowing this chemical access
to brain tissue.
Honest scientists who have attempted to
blow the whistle on sodium fluoride's mega-bucks propaganda
campaign have consistently been given a large dose of
professional 'black-listing' and thus their valid points
disputing the current vested interests never have received the
ink they deserve in the national press. Just follow the money to
find the 'control' and you will find prominent American families
to be prominent 'players' in the scandal. In 1952 a slick PR
campaign rammed the concept of 'fluoridation' through our Public
Health departments and various dental organizations. This slick
campaign was more akin to a highly emotional "beer salesman
convention" instead of the objective, scientifically researched
program that it should have been. It has continued in the same
vein right up to the present day - and now sodium fluoride use
has now become 'usual and customary'.
To illustrate the emotional vs. the
scientific nature of this issue, just look at the response given
by people (perhaps yourself included?) when the subject of
fluoridation comes up. You need to ask yourself, "Is this
particular response based on EMOTIONS born of TRADITION, or is
it truly unbiased and based instead on thoroughly researched
objectivity?" There is a tremendous amount of emotional, highly
unscientific "know-it-all" emotions attached to the topic of
'sodium fluoride' usage -but I personally have yet to find even
ONE objective, double blind study that even remotely links
sodium fluoride to healthy teeth at ANY AGE. Instead, I hear and
read such blather as "9 out of 10 DENTISTS recommend 'fluoride'
toothpaste" etc. etc. etc. Let me reiterate: truly independent
(unattached to moneyed vested interest groups) scientists who've
spent a large portion of their lives studying and working with
this subject have been hit with a surprising amount of unfair
character assassinations from strong vested-interest groups who
reap grand profits from the public's ignorance as well as from
their illnesses. (Just follow the money!)
Do you have diabetes and/or kidney
disease? There are reportedly more than 11 million Americans
with diabetes. If it is true that diabetics drink more liquids
than other people, then according to the Physicians Desk
Reference these 11 million people are at much higher risk
drinking fluoridated water because they will receive a much
deadlier dose because of their need for higher than normal water
consumption. Kidney disease, by definition, lowers the
efficiency of the kidneys, which of course is the primary means
in which fluoride (or any other toxic chemical) is eliminated
from the body. Does it not make sense that these people
shouldn't drink fluoridated water at all? Cases are on record
(Annapolis, Maryland, 1979) where ill kidney patients on
dialysis machines died because they ingested relatively small
amounts of SODIUM FLUORIDE from unwittingly drinking the
'fluoridated' city water supply? Will adequate warnings be given
to people with weak kidneys, or will the real cause of such
deaths be 'covered up' in the name of 'domestic tranquility'?
Concerning the 'practice' of putting
sodium fluoride into drinking water, where did this insanity
begin and WHO tried it first? From personal research, the very
first occurrence of purposefully putting sodium fluoride into
drinking water was in the German ghettos and in Nazi Germany's
infamous prison camps. The Gestapo you see had little concern
about sodium fluoride's 'supposed' effect on children's teeth;
instead, their reason for mass-medicating water with sodium
fluoride was to STERILIZE HUMANS and force the people in their
concentration camps into calm, bovine, submission. (See for
reference: "The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben" written by
Joseph Borkin.) Kind of shocking isn't it folks!! Ah, but it
gets even better.
The following letter was received by
the Lee Foundation for Nutritional Research, Milwaukee
Wisconsin, on 2 October 1954, from a research chemist by the
name of Charles Perkins. He writes:
"I have your letter of September 29
asking for further documentation regarding a statement made in
my book, "The Truth about Water Fluoridation", to the effect
that the idea of water fluoridation was brought to England from
Russia by the Russian Communist Kreminoff. In the 1930's Hitler
and the German Nazis envisioned a world to be dominated and
controlled by a Nazi philosophy of pan-Germanism. The German
chemists worked out a very ingenious and far-reaching plan of
mass-control which was submitted to and adopted by the German
General Staff. This plan was to control the population in any
given area through mass medication of drinking water supplies.
By this method they could control the population in whole areas,
reduce population by water medication that would produce
sterility in women, and so on. In this scheme of mass-control,
sodium fluoride occupied a prominent place.
"Repeated doses of infinitesimal
amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an individual's power to
resist domination, by slowly poisoning and narcotizing a certain
area of the brain, thus making him submissive to the will of
those who wish to govern him. [A convenient and cost-effective
light lobotomy? --- Ott].
"The real reason behind water
fluoridation is not to benefit children's teeth. If this were
the real reason there are many ways in which it could be done
that are much easier, cheaper, and far more effective. The real
purpose behind water fluoridation is to reduce the resistance of
the masses to domination and control and loss of liberty."
"When the Nazis under Hitler decided to
go to Poland, both the German General Staff and the Russian
General Staff exchanged scientific and military ideas, plans,
and personnel, and the scheme of mass control through water
medication was seized upon by the Russian Communists because it
fitted ideally into their plans to communize the world."
"I was told of this entire scheme by a
German chemist who was an official of the great I.G. Farben
chemical industries and was also prominent in the Nazi movement
at the time. I say this with all the earnestness and sincerity
of a scientist who has spent nearly 20 years' research into the
chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology of fluorine
--- any person who drinks artificially fluorinated water for a
period of one year or more will never again be the same person
mentally or physically."
Signed: CHARLES E. PERKINS, Chemist, 2
October, 1954.
Another letter needs to be quoted at
length as well to help corroborate Mr. Perkin's testimony. This
letter was written by a brilliant (and objectively honest)
scientist named Dr. E.H. Bronner. Dr. Bronner was a nephew of
the great Albert Einstein, served time in a WWII prison camp and
wrote the following letter printed in the Catholic Mirror,
Springfield, MA, January 1952:
"It appears that the citizens of
Massachusetts are among the 'next' on the agenda of the water
poisoners.
"There is a sinister network of
subversive agents, Godless intellectual parasites, working in
our country today whose ramifications grow more extensive, more
successful and more alarming each new year and whose true
objective is to demoralize, paralyze and destroy our great
Republic ---- from within if they can, according to their plan
--- for their own possession."
"The tragic success they have already
attained in their long siege to destroy the moral fiber of
American life is now one of their most potent footholds towards
their own ultimate victory over us."
"Fluoridation of our community water
systems can well become their most subtle weapon for our sure
physical and mental deterioration. As a research chemist of
established standing, I built within the past 22 years 3
American chemical plants and licensed 6 of my 53 patents. Based
on my years of practical experience in the health food and
chemical field, let me warn: fluoridation of drinking water is
criminal insanity, sure national suicide. DON'T DO IT!!"
"Even in very small quantities, sodium
fluoride is a deadly poison to which no effective antidote has
been found. Every exterminator knows that it is the most
effective rat-killer. Sodium Fluoride is entirely different from
organic calcium-fluoro-phosphate needed by our bodies and
provided by nature, in God's great providence and love, to build
and strengthen our bones and our teeth. This organic calcium-fluoro-phosphate,
derived from proper foods, is an edible organic salt, insoluble
in water and assimilable by the human body; whereas the
non-organic sodium fluoride used in fluoridating water is
instant poison to the body and fully water soluble. The body
refuses to assimilate it."
"Careful, bonafide laboratory
experimentation by conscientious, patriotic research chemists,
and actual medical experience, have both revealed that instead
of preserving or promoting 'dental health', fluoridated drinking
water destroys teeth before adulthood and after, by the
destructive mottling and other pathological conditions it
actually causes in them, and also creates many other very grave
pathological conditions in the internal organisms of bodies
consuming it. How then can it be called a 'health plan'? What's
behind it?"
"That any so-called 'Doctors' would
persuade a civilized nation to add voluntarily a deadly poison
to its drinking water systems is unbelievable. It is the height
of criminal insanity!"
"No wonder Hitler and Stalin fully
believed and agreed from 1939 to 1941 that, quoting from both
Lenin's 'Last Will' and Hitler's Mein Kampf: "America we
shall demoralize, divide, and destroy from within."
"Are our Civil Defense organizations
and agencies awake to the perils of water poisoning by
fluoridation? Its use has been recorded in other countries.
Sodium Fluoride water solutions are the cheapest and most
effective rat killers known to chemists: colorless, odorless,
tasteless; no antidote, no remedy, no hope: Instant and complete
extermination of rats."
"Fluoridation of water systems can be
slow national suicide, or quick national liquidation. It is
criminal insanity ------- treason!!"
Signed: Dr. E.H. Bronner, Research
Chemist, Los Angeles
Apparently, the public outcry by Dr.
Bronner and others precluded the fluoridation of public water
systems for a season - but soon thereafter, the Food and Drug
Administration allowed this deadly poison to be put in
'toothpaste', and our dentists were systematically brainwashed
into providing 'fluoride treatments' to their many patients. Of
course, today many major metropolitan areas have a minimum of 1
parts per million sodium fluoride systematically added to their
water supply and more areas are seeking to add this poison every
year. Add to this the fact that bottling companies (soft drinks,
juices, etc.) use fluoridated water to make their products - is
it any wonder that people can no longer think clearly and ask
pertinent questions of their elected and ecclesiastical leaders?
Is it also a mystery why so many top Nazi mind control
scientists were brought to America by the CIA and their infamous
'Operation Paper Clip'?
If you believe all of this is 'just a
coincidence' - go ahead and keep brushing your teeth with your
'fluoride' toothpaste and sucking on your sodium fluoride
enhanced Coke or Pepsi product - for ignorance truly is bliss
and you truly deserve what you get.
Mothers, if your little ones are having
trouble concentrating at home or in school, or have been
diagnosed as 'attention deficit' - perhaps you would be well
advised to look for the culprit (and the solution to the
problem) no further than your home medicine cabinet (your tube
of toothpaste) and your friendly neighborhood school's water
fountain!!
'Second Thoughts about Fluoride,' Reports Scientific
American Reuters (January
2, 2008) -
"Some recent studies suggest that over-consumption of fluoride can raise
the risks of disorders affecting teeth, bones, the brain and the thyroid
gland," reports Scientific American editors (January 2008). "Scientific
attitudes toward fluoridation may be starting to
shift," writes author Dan Fagin. "Fluoride, the most consumed drug in
the USA, is deliberately added to 2/3 of public water supplies
theoretically to reduce tooth decay, but with no scientifically-valid
evidence proving safety or effectiveness," says lawyer Paul Beeber,
President, New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation. Fagin,
award-wining environmental reporter and Director of New York
University's Science, Health and Environmental Reporting Program,
writes, "There is no universally accepted optimal level for daily intake
of fluoride." Some researchers even wonder whether the 1 mg/L added into
drinking water is too much, reports Fagin. After 3 years of scrutinizing
hundreds of studies, a National Research Council (NRC) committee
"concluded that fluoride can subtly alter endocrine function, especially
in the thyroid -- the gland that produces hormones regulating growth and
metabolism," reports Fagin. Fagin quotes John Doull, professor emeritus
of pharmacology and toxicology at the University of Kansas Medical
Center, who chaired the NRC committee thusly, "The thyroid changes do
worry me." Fluoride in foods, beverages, medicines and dental products
can result in fluoride over-consumption, visible in young children as
dental fluorosis -- white spotted, yellow, brown and/or pitted teeth. We
can't normally see fluoride's effects to the rest of the body. Reports
Fagin, "a series of epidemiological studies in China have associated
high fluoride exposures with lower IQ." "(E)pidemiological studies and
tests on lab animals suggest that high fluoride exposure increases the
risk of bone fracture, especially in vulnerable populations such as the
elderly and diabetics," writes Fagin. Fagin interviewed Steven Levy,
director of the Iowa Fluoride Study which tracked about 700 Iowa
children for sixteen years. Nine-year-old "Iowa children who lived in
communities where the water was fluoridated were 50 percent more likely
to have mild fluorosis... than [nine-year-old] children
living in nonfluoridated areas of the state," writes Fagin. Levy will
study fluoride's effects on their bones. Over 1200 professionals urge
Congress to cease water fluoridation and conduct Congressional hearings
because scientific evidence indicates fluoridation is ineffective and
has serious health risks.
In a society where asbestos, lead, silica, beryllium and many other
carcinogens have found their way into the marketplace and then been
recalled, one has to wonder why fluoride, so toxic it is used as a
rat poison and pesticide, is embraced so thoroughly and so blindly.
"The Fluoride Deception unearths the mystery of how a grim workplace
poison and the most damaging environmental pollutant of the Cold War
was added to our drinking water and toothpaste. A chronicle of the
abuse of power and of the manufacture of state-sponsored medical
propaganda, The Fluoride Deception reveals how a secretive group of
powerful industries, all of which faced extensive litigation for
fluoride pollution, collaborated with officials from the National
Institute of Dental Research to launder fluoride's public
image."--BOOK JACKET
Alert over jab for girls as two die following cervical
cancer vaccination
Daily Mail (January
25, 2008) - A jab that could be given to hundreds of thousands of
schoolgirls this autumn was at the centre at a safety scare last night
following the deaths of two young women. European regulators are
investigating the "sudden and unexpected" deaths of the women who
received Gardasil, one of two jabs to protect against cervical cancer
licensed for use in the UK. The vaccine has been hailed as a
breakthrough by the Department of Health, which is backing an annual
programme of vaccination for girls aged 11 to 13 years starting in
September. The jab is already available privately and a
thirteen-year-old girl from London became the first in the country to
receive the cervical cancer vaccine in 2006. Hollie Anderson's mother,
Lisa, paid £450 for her to have the jab after seeing her own mother
battle against cancer. The European Medicines Agency (EMEA) said one of
the young women who received Gardasil died in Germany while the other
was in Austria. It has not released their ages. It follows the deaths of
three young women aged 12, 19 and 22 who were reported to have died in
the U.S. days after Gardasil was administered, with 1,700 patients
suffering "adverse reactions". There were no previous recorded deaths in
Europe. The EMEA said: "In both cases, the cause of death could not be
identified. "No causal relationship has been established between the
deaths of the young women and the administration of Gardasil." A
spokesman said 1.5 million people had been given the vaccine in Europe.
She said there were no plans to change advice on the use of the vaccine.
The UK vaccination programme will protect girls against the
sexually-transmitted human papillomavirus (HPV) that causes cervical
cancer. It should help cut up to 1,000 deaths a year from the disease.
Gardasil, made by Merck, is one of the jabs to be used initially. The
other is Cervarix, made by Glaxo-SmithKline. Dr Nicholas Kitchin,
medical director at Sanofi Pasteur MSD, which markets Gardasil, said:
"The authorities in the two countries have looked intensively at these
two cases and have not established a causal link, and this has been
endorsed by the EMEA. "The fact that the EMEA is not taking any action
on the back of this should be seen as reassuring that the product
remains safe."
28 Women Miscarry After Receiving HPV Vaccine Gardasil; FDA Says No
Reason to Re-Examine Approval
Fox News (December
6, 2007) -
The
U.S. Food and Drug Administration said the cervical cancer vaccine
Gardasil is safe despite that 28 U.S. women who received the
vaccination had miscarriages, CNSnews.com reports.
Clinical trials show the vaccine's miscarriage rate is consistent
with that of women in the general population who were given
placebos, and most of the miscarriages reported cannot directly be
connected to Gardasil, the FDA said. There have been 3,461 adverse
reactions, including eight deaths, reported since the vaccine was
approved for use in girls as young as 9 in June 2006. The FDA and
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have concluded most
side effects are minor and believe there is no reason to re-examine
the drug's approval.
Can vaccinations cause long-term health problems for children? Could
they be the root cause of autism? Should your child be vaccinated? This
is a must-see DVD for parents on the fence about whether to vaccinate
their children. This highly informative 3-hour presentation by Dr.
Sherri Tenpenny offers the most comprehensive overview of each vaccine
available with a step-by-step guide through each shot, and offers
irrefutable facts regarding the risks involved with the infections
vaccines are meant to protect us from. Dr. Tenpenny is respected as one
of the country's most knowledgeable and outspoken physicians regarding
the impact of vaccines on health. As a member of the prestigious
National Speaker's Association, she is an outspoken advocate for free
choice in healthcare, including the right to refuse vaccination. An
internationally known speaker, Dr. Tenpenny is highly sought after for
her ability to present scientifically sound information regarding
vaccination hazard and warnings that are rarely portrayed by
conventional medicine. She has presented at the National Vaccine
Information Center's annual meeting and at several international
conferences on autism.
The Question of the Century for all Parents! Full Color High Resolution
Widescreen DVD presentation answers the most frequently asked questions
about vaccine safety. The DVD features toxicologist M.D., Phillip DeMio,
who vaccinated his own son and watched in horror as he slipped into
severe autism. He tells his story and shares how he has dedicated his
life to helping vaccine injured children in Ohio. Dr. DeMio, like many
medical doctors, was not aware of the problems with vaccines until
vaccines injured his own child. His story is shocking! This is the most
important health care decision you will ever make for your children.
This DVD is perfect for the board room, public events or can also be
shared with your doctor before you make your vaccine decision. Mary
Tocco creatively provides the flip side of the coin, facts most doctors
are not aware of. It is a powerful easy to understand message filled
with facts (Congressional records and medical research) presented by
Mary Tocco so you can make an informed decision. What can you do if you
see signs of injury from the vaccine? Mary Tocco answers that question
and many, many more.
Is There an Autism Epidemic?
About.com - When many of us were
growing up, autism was a rarely-heard-of disability. Today, everyone
seems to be or know someone with an autistic child. Certainly, the
numbers of children diagnosed with autism has surged in the past
decade. But there's tremendous disagreement about whether the
increase in diagnoses is truly reflective of more autism -- or just
reflective of more diagnoses. A Brief History of Autism Statistics:
Autism was first described as a unique disorder in the 1940's. In
the early 1990's, autism diagnoses began to soar. In the ten years
between 1993 and 2003, the number of American schoolchildren with
autism diagnoses increased by over 800%. Now, in 2006, the CDC has
noted a slight decrease in the number of new cases diagnosed.
Changes in the Diagnostic Criteria: In
1991,the Autism Diagnostic Interview was published. This was the
first generally recognized tool for diagnosing autism. In 1992, the
American Psychiatric Association released the Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual (DSM-IV), which refined diagnostic criteria for
autistic disorder. Autism became a spectrum disorder; in essence, it
became possible for someone to be very autistic or mildly autistic.
Changes in the IDEA Law: Up until 1990,
autism was not included in legislation aimed at guaranteeing an
education to individuals with handicaps. In 1990, the new
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act added autism to its list
of categories of children and youth served under the act. The new
law also added transition services and assistive technologies to its
requirements. Autism had never been tracked as an educational
statistic before 1990. Since 1990, the incidence of autism in
schools has risen dramatically.
Vaccines and Autism: Thimerosal, a
mercury-based preservative, was first added to vaccines in the
1930's. By the 1990's, babies and young children were receiving
multiple thimerosal-containing vaccines. A passionate group of
doctors and parents, convinced that thimerosal was responsible for a
growing autism rate, pushed hard to have the preservative removed.
In 1999, thimerosal was removed from most vaccines. Despite many
studies, the CDC states they there is no connection between autism
and thimerosal.
The 2006 CDC Research: This year, the CDC
conducted a large-scale survey to better understand the prevalence
of autism in the United States. They found that about 300,000
individuals -- or one in every 166 people -- had been diagnosed on
the autism spectrum. They also found that there was a slight
decrease in the incidence of autism diagnoses since 1999.
So what replaced the
thimerosal as the preservative?
Why Did Autism Diagnoses Soar?: Clearly,
there are two schools of thought on this issue. On the one hand are
those who say that the change in diagnostic criteria, combined with
new school statistics and rising awareness of autism all created an
apparent (but not real) epidemic. On the other hand are those who
say that thimerosal caused the epidemic -- and the removal of
thimerosal from vaccines means the beginning of the end of the
epidemic.
Are Autism Diagnoses Still on the Rise?:
There has been a slight decrease in the number of annual autism
diagnoses. This change, in some researchers' view, is highly
significant -- and goes a long way toward proving the thimerosal
theory. Dr. Robert Davis, director at the immunization safety group
at the CDC, however, says the change is not statistically
significant, and “[cannot] really be taken to provide any evidence
one way or the other."
Be not overcome
of evil, but overcome evil with good. Romans 12:21
Watchman Bible Study | 2005 - 2008 Site Map
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section
107, any copyrighted work herein is archived under
fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in reviewing the included information for personal use, non-profit research and
educational purposes only. Ref.
