This page is a resource for proving the accuracy and validity of the
Biblical record of creation by God, the Creator. Science itself, in
researching how the universe works, has come to show time and again that what
we see in the world matches the Biblical record. This is where I will present
2 Thessalonians 2:7-12 For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth
will let, until he be taken out of the way. And then shall that Wicked
be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth,
and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming: Even him, whose
coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying
wonders, And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that
perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might
be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion,
that they should believe a lie: That they all might be
damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
I believe that part of the great deception in the end times that God
gives the world over to is the idea of evolution. It attacks the very
foundation of God through supposed “higher reasoning.” In reality, the
religious belief of evolution has infiltrated the education system posing as
real science and leading young impressionable minds away from God. The
effects of evolution remove moral standards and promote the “do what you
want” mentality because according to evolution, we’re all here by chance and
when we die its over. Why would one not take full advantage of the time they
have? And with the motto of today being “look out for number 1,” it’s
not difficult to see how this core belief system can destroy the fabric of
society with no solid foundation as God gave us in His Word. This is all
part of the plan in the works by the spiritual wickedness in high places
that I cover briefly in the
of the Mystery of Iniquity.
“Evolution destroys utterly and finally the
very reason Jesus’ earthly life was supposedly made necessary. Destroy
Adam and Eve and original sin, and in the rubble you will find the sorry
remains of the son of God...and if Jesus was not the redeemer who dies
for our sins, and this is what evolution means, then Christianity is
G. Richard Bozarth, American Atheist
I was going to try and put together a page for those who believe in
evolution. I knew about one quote from Darwin himself about not really believing
this theory, then I found all these. I’ll just let Darwin himself explain...
Re: Evolution not being scientific
“You will be greatly disappointed (by the forthcoming book); it will
be grievously too hypothetical. It will very likely be of no other service
than collocating some facts; though I myself think I see my way approximately
on the origin of the species. But, alas, how frequent, how almost universal it
is in an author to persuade himself of the truth of his own dogmas.”
Darwin, 1858, in a letter to a colleague regarding the concluding chapters
of his Origin of Species. As quoted in ‘John Lofton’s Journal’, The
Washington Times, 8 February 1984.
Re: Do the facts prove evolution?
“For I am well aware that scarcely a single point is discussed in this
volume on which facts cannot be adduced, often apparently leading to
conclusions directly opposite to those at which I have arrived. A fair result
can be obtained only by fully stating and balancing the facts and arguments on
both sides of each question; and this is here impossible.” |
Darwin, 1859, Introduction to Origin of Species, p. 2. Also quoted in
‘John Lofton’s Journal’, The Washington Times, 8 February 1984
Re: “General difficulties with the theory of evolution
“Long before having arrived at this part of my work, a crowd of
difficulties will have occurred to my reader. Some of them are so grave that
to this day I can never reflect on them without being staggered...”
Darwin, (ed. J. W. Burrow), The Origin of Species (Baltimore,
MD: Penguin Books, 1974.), p. 205.
Re: Evolution is a faith not based on evidence
“When we descend to details we can prove that no one species has
changed (i.e., we cannot prove that a single species has changed): nor can we
prove that the supposed changes are beneficial, which is the groundwork of the
theory. Nor can we explain why some species have changed and others have not.
The latter case seems to me hardly more difficult to understand precisely and
in detail than the former case of supposed change.” | Charles
Re: Evolution is impossible
“To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting
the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light,
and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been
formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest
possible degree.” | Charles Darwin,
Origin of Species, 1st Ed., p. 186.
Re: Evolution leads to immorality
“A man who has no assured and ever-present belief in the existence of a
personal God, or of a future existence with retribution and reward, can have
for his rule of life, as far as I can see, only to follow those impulses and
instincts which are the strongest or which seem to him the best ones.” | Charles
Darwin, The Morality of Evolution, Autobiography, Norton, p.
Some more quotes on Evolution
“I feel most deeply that the whole subject
(religion) is too profound for the human intellect. A dog might as well
speculate on the mind of Newton. Let each man hope and believe what he
can.” | Charles Darwin
“...Time is the hero of the plot...what we
regard as impossible on the basis of human experience is meaningless
here. Given so much time, the impossible becomes possible.” |
George Wald, Scientific American
“Getting rid of the idea of God freed me up
to my erotic desires.” | Bertrand Russell
“[I suppose the
reason that] we all jumped at the origin
[of species] was
that the idea of God interfered with our sexual mores.”
| Sir Julian Huxley, Leading Evolutionist of his day and
first Director-General of
“...Darwin’s theory is...no longer a theory,
but a fact...Darwinianism has come of age so to speak. We are no
longer having to bother about establishing the fact of evolution.”
| Sir Julian Huxley, cited in David Noebel, Understanding
“Evolution is a fact amply
demonstrated by the fossil record and by contemporary molecular biology.
Natural selection is a successful theory devised to explain the fact
of evolution.” |
Carl Sagen, The Dragons of Eden
“It is clear that the doctrine of Evolution
is directly antagonistic to that of creation. Evolution, if consistently
accepted, makes it impossible to believe the Bible.” | Sir
Julian Huxley, Leading Evolutionist of his day and first
“Today, although many educators play it safe
by calling evolutionary ideas ‘theory’ instead of ‘fact,’ there is no
reputable biologist who doubts that species including Homo sapiens, have
developed with time, and that they are continually, though slowly,
changing.” | Isaac Asimov, The Wellsprings of
“If all animals and man evolved, then there
were no first parents, no Adam and Eve, no Eden, no fall of man. And if
there had been no fall, then the entire historic fabric of Christianity,
the story of the first sin and the reason for an atonement collapsed
like a house of cards.” | H.G. Wells
is absolutely safe to say that if you meet somebody who claims not to
believe in evolution, that person is ignorant, stupid or
insane (or wicked, but I’d rather not consider that).”
| Richard Dawkins, prominent Oxford scientist and author.
Cited in M. Hartwig, Challenging Darwin’s Myths, Moody Monthly
German Führer, as I have consistently maintained, is an evolutionist; he
has consciously sought to make the practice of Germany conform to the
theory of evolution.”
| Sir Arthur Keith,
Evolution and Ethics, Putnam, NY, USA, p. 230, 1947
Jeremiah 2:27 Saying to a stock, Thou art my father; and to a stone, Thou hast brought
me forth: for they have turned their back unto me, and not their face:
but in the time of their trouble they will say, Arise, and save us.
Evolution assumes that man dropped out of the
trees 1 to 5 million years ago and became fully human approximately
one hundred thousand years ago. Yet archeological records show
civilization arising only about five thousand years ago (based on
evolutionary thinking). In other words, by evolutionary reasoning,
it took mankind ninety-five thousand years—after becoming fully
human—to figure out that food could be produced by dropping a seed
into the ground!
Another indication of both a young earth and a
confirmation of the worldwide Flood is the scarcity of meteors in
sedimentary rock layers. Although some meteors have been found in
sedimentary layers, they are relatively rare. Meteors are easily
identifiable, and many thousands have been identified and recovered
from recent impacts on the planet’s surface. If most of the rock
layers were laid down rapidly during the one-year period of a
worldwide Flood, you would not expect to find many meteorites buried
in only one year. However, if the sediment was laid down over
billions of years, there should be multiple billions of meteorites
buried within this sediment. The fact that we find so few is another
possible evidence for the rapid accumulation of the sedimentary
layers and a young earth.
Suppose you walked into an empty room and found a
smoking cigar. You could assume that the cigar was very old and that
it had only recently burst into flames, but the more logical
conclusion would be that someone had recently been there to light
it. The universe is full of similar “smoking cigars”:
All planetary rings still exhibit intricacies
which should have long ago disappeared.
All known comets burn up their material with
each pass around the sun and should have a maximum life
expectancy of one hundred thousand years.
The outer solar system planets should have
long ago cooled off.
The spiral galaxies should have long ago
un-spiraled, and the uneven dispersion of matter in the universe
should have long ago dispersed.
Scientists working from the preconception that the
universe is 10-20 billion years old have suggested controversial and
complicated possibilities for how these types of transient phenomena
could still exist, but their explanations are based more on faith,
not science. The simpler explanation is that these “smoking cigars” are smoking because they are young.
What about dating methods which do seem to
indicate that things are very old? As seen in the first article on
dating methods, assumptions are everything. For instance,
generation rate has never significantly changed. This method does
not date the age of the earth but understanding it can have a
profound effect on our interpretation of the “ice age” and the
“stone age.” A recent worldwide catastrophe would have caused an
enormous change in the total amount of carbon on earth’s biosphere.
This event would completely invalidate one of the basic assumptions
of the carbon-14 dating method (a known carbon-14 to carbon-12 ratio
throughout the measurement period) and lead to excessively old dates
for organisms alive shortly after this Flood. This problem with
carbon-14 dating assumptions will be described in detail in another
Psalm 24:1,2 The earth is the LORD’s, and the fulness thereof; the
world, and they that dwell therein. For he hath founded it upon the seas, and established it
upon the floods.
Psalm 136:6 To him that stretched out the earth
above the waters:
for his mercy endureth for ever.
Dr. Walt Brown’s Hydroplate Theory:
Evidence from the Grand Canyon
Notice in the picture above that the Grand Canyon actually runs
through a mountain range. Did water flow uphill millions of years
ago? Or is this evidence of the lake following the flood that was
held back by this mountain range until it overflowed the top
creating the Grand Canyon?
The Flood: Evidence Against Modern Theory
Scientific dating from layers of sedimentary rock claimed to be
millions of years when in actuality it was very quickly at the global
Genesis 7:11-12 on that day all the springs of the great
deep burst forth
flood possibly began when the earth’s crust was fractured
releasing subterranean caverns of water and magma. The picture
at right shows the locations of the mid oceanic ridge which
resides all over the world, and are possibly where the earth was
The “springs of the great deep” are believed to be
pre-flood subterranean water-table much like those that still
exist today in remnant form. Unknown to many, much of the land
under our feet resides upon massive ancient bodies of water such
as the Ogallala
aquifer pictured at left. The Ogallala Aquifer resides under
several states in the US, and supplies continuous spring water
such as the famous Artesian Wells (et al.
It is thought that all land masses were positioned upon aquifers at
the beginning of creation which supplied free-flowing rivers before
the flood. It was these ancient massive aquifers that were triggered
to “burst-forth” and
flooded the earth. Even though these aquifers were largely
depleted, today 40% of the drinking water in the United States
comes from these ancient ground waters.
What Started the Flood?
According to the Bible, God decided to destroy the earth by
flood because man had become wicked, and in particular due to a
race known as
Nephilim. Although the exact mechanism used may
never be known, the event that triggered the breech of the
“springs of the great deep” may have been caused or
accompanied by other catastrophic processes. Evidence of meteor
and volcanic activity is interspersed throughout
geological column, and it is presumed by some that perhaps a
series of meteor impacts fractured the earth’s crust causing the
pre-flood aquifers to flow unrestricted. It can only be presumed
what actually caused the flood other than the might hand-of-God,
but there were clear and irreversible alterations of both our
earth’s crust and atmosphere as a result of the great flood.
Mechanism of Flood Water Recession
A portion of the flood water recession was accomplished by
glacial formation. It is almost certain there was proportionally
more land available immediately after the flood than there is
currently. The ocean levels continue to rise today because of
melting of glacial deposits that were formed when the earth was
still completely covered in flood water. It is believed the
majority of the glacial development, known as
the ice ages,
formed during the flood, and was responsible for land and ice
bridges allowing the post flood migration of animals and humans
into regions that are now completely isolated by water (i.e.
Today the earth’s crust has sufficiently uneven elevations so
that about 30% remains above the water line, however, if the
present contour of the earth’s surface was leveled, the entire
planet would still be covered by water to a depth of 9000 feet.
Much of the deformation of the earth’s crust has occurred since
the deposition of
stratified sediment during the flood. These layers were
originally laid in horizontal rows, and have since been folded
and forced upward. Therefore most of the tectonic activity
responsible for mountain building has been relatively recent,
and likely driven by receding flood waters.
Most of the rise in the earth’s land elevation has been due
to plate tectonic activity caused by spreading oceans. The
continental land masses have been essentially crushed, and slabs
of crust have been overthrust or subducted under others causing
mountain building, and volcanism. If is presumed by some
creationists, that the majority of the ocean bodies are settled
flood waters, and it is this accumulation that is driving the
spreading of the mid-oceanic ridge and related geological
movement. It is believed the oceans have essentially stretched
to accommodate the accumulation of the expelled subterranean
water, and the pressure of this expanding volume displaced the
newly formed layers causing deformations such as folding, and
So in effect, the pre-flood world was all generally around the same
elevation with no seas. The ocean trenches are where the water broke
through the surface and as the water pressure was released below,
the land collapsed under the water’s surface. What used to be dry
land became the ocean floor. Dr. John Baumgardner also has presented
his work related to understanding the Genesis flood
here. This would seem a more logical
conclusion than the earth moving from these trenches and account for
how the earth could be covered and then the water receded. This also
accounts for the trees found going through geologic column layers of
millions of years. Just as flooding sifts debris today very quickly,
so too are these things accounted for in a world-wide flood. There
is also the clam shells found on mountaintops and the Grand Canyon.
More detail on this at
Answers in Genesis.
2 Peter 3:3-7 Knowing this first, that
there shall come in the last
days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, And saying, Where
is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell
asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of
the creation. For this they willingly are ignorant of, that
by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth
standing out of the water and in the water: Whereby the world
that then was, being overflowed with water, perished: But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word
are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of
judgment and perdition of ungodly men.
I listened to a fascinating episode of
Coast to Coast AM on March 11, 2007 with Wallace Thornhill about
the electrical nature of the universe and past cataclysms. Observations of the
universe and the sun in particular show characteristics of an electrically
charged solar system and universe responsible for solar activity and
interaction between planets and the other solar systems in the Milky Way. This
has been proven further to be true with the August 2007 alignment of the
planets and the effects that could be seen in the weather on the earth.
More on that from James McCanney.
of the observations was that the surface of the sun is much hotter than its
core and how sunspots show this cooler internal temperature. If that is really
the case, then the core should be the hottest. What this also shows is how all
the celestial bodies in the solar system are linked together.
another video where Stan Deyo discusses gravity waves and how that causes the
orbits of the planets in their resonant paths. See it
here. What is fascinating and links
all this together is the understanding that all of creation is an
electro-magnetic illusion of sorts. Our senses perceive our surroundings by
sensing different parts of the electro-magnetic spectrum. Different
frequencies on this spectrum are picked up by different senses. This is the
active, continual voice of God speaking creation into continued existence.
String theory holds that the smallest particles are little “strings.” their
frequency determines how they interact with each other and combine to
create atomic structures, which combine to create matter. It seems the
whole material reality we know is based in this idea of changing
frequency. Indeed, this idea is seen in the first three verses of the
the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without
form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of
God moved upon the face of the waters. And God said, ‘Let there be
light:’ and there was light.’” God spoke creation into existence. The four dimensions in which we reside was
not in existence until God said something. So with string theory, the
strings were always there, but until God spoke creation and began to play
them like a musical instrument, matter did not exist. God controls all
strings across all existence and so upon the beginning notes of His
symphonic voice of creation, matter was. I would recommend watching
Proves Creation - If God spoke everything into
existence as the Genesis record proposes, then we should be able to
scientifically prove that the construction of everything in the universe
begins with a) the Holy Spirit (magnetic field); b) Light (an electric field);
and c) that Light can be created by a sonic influence or sound,” Samuel J.
Hunt writes on his website.
A science student in Kentucky says when
the Bible records God spoke, and things were created, that’s just what
happened, and he can support that with scientific experiments. “There are
several documented and currently taught laboratory experiments that
accurately portray the events in Genesis in sequential order, the most
important being that of sonoluminescence,” he wrote.
That, he described to
WND, is the circumstance in which sending a sonic signal into bubbles in a
fluid causes the bubbles to collapse and they release photons, or create
light. That aligns with one of the earlier descriptions of the creation by
God, when, in Genesis 1:1-3, the Holy Spirit moved upon the face of the
deep, which generally is considered water, and said “Let there be light,” he
explained. God was sending a sonic influence into the waters, and basically
creating light, Hunt said.
He’s documented his theory, and the experiments
he believes back it up, in his “Episteme Scientia, the Law of All That Is.” Researchers at institutions no less than UCLA and the University of Chicago
have verified the production of light from bubbles when sound is passed
through a liquid, called sonoluminescence.
Hunt said he was spurred on in
his work because the advanced physics and other courses he was taking were
advancing propositions that sometimes didn’t match up. “The further I went,
the more my questions seemed to be being answered in the Genesis record,” he
told WND. His abstract states, “An examination of the sequential
mathematical and experimental dual proof of the Genesis record of
origins underlying the institution of all that is in the universe –
from waves to matter to the mind.”
Hunt said science has been proving the Genesis account
in classrooms for centuries, “in spite of the fervency to promote evolution
and big bang theories.” A student at Western Kentucky University in Bowling
Green, Hunt said his questions started very simply. “I asked my professors
in physics and chemistry, ‘What if I could scientifically prove that all
matter was spoken into existence and that all matter could be manipulated by
sound just as Genesis says? Wouldn’t that mean God exists and created the
universe?” he asked. “Nobody’s ever done that before,” was the response.
84-page treatise, now published, addresses that, he said. Hunt said he
believes every event in Genesis can be observed to be happening daily.
“Either you experience a universe of chaos or a universe of order and
processes that produce immediate and calculable results,” he wrote. “The
results of my research support and prove that everything that exists
was spoken into existence from waves to matter to mind.”
“My professors think my
application of accepted laws and theories may bend the rules a bit, but the
ideas are thought-provoking and progressive,” he said. The website describes
the integration of several mathematical systems including “Phi, Pi,
L-systems, Penrose tiling, and an all-encompassing Koch curve.”
available at scienceprovescreation.com, already has sold more than 1,700
copies. Hunt said his goal was to be able to provide experiments that would
explain the Genesis creation story – in the order the Bible records events
happened. “Some of my teachers are like, ‘That’s complete hogwash,’” he
said, “while others say, ‘That’s pretty interesting.’” His goal is to bring
a unity to the Christian community, “just like the founders of our nation
expected and wanted from the Constitution.” The documentation of his
processes, Hunt believes, could end debate. “People want to know the truth,
to have something to stand on that’s not trickery and deceit,” he said.
“This gives people something real to touch, hang on to.”
If you doubt the idea of sound creating structure, here is a
cool video of an experiment on this very idea. Notice how different
frequencies produce different designs.
Now if we put that together with the idea of string
theory, where strings vibrating at different frequencies produce atomic
structure that build the material world in which we live, and scripture
stating God spoke the universe into existence, it begins to make sense. Even
miracles like turning water into wine. If Yeshua can affect the subatomic
frequencies producing the water, in theory He could speak a new frequency
and change the structure and makeup of the water instantaneously.
video of Dr. Hans
Jenny in his study of Cymatics - study of matters pertaining to waves.
Recognizing that light is also frequency and
that the electromagnetic spectrum covers all frequencies, auditory and
visual, I think this shows how frequency is a very large part of the
universe and its makeup and operation. Here are some more videos on sound
and it’s effects on matter:
From the video site:
DIY! “I took apart a computer speaker and mounted it with hot glue inside a
metal coffee can. Using
sinegen.exe, I created waves that warped a liquid mixture. I used
water and corn starch in a semi-fluid mixture (not the thickest possible).”
The God Delusion Debate - Audio of the Richard Dawkins - John Lennox
debate regarding Richard Dawkins book titled The God Delusion.
Richard’s website is a proud member of the Rational Response Squad.
There are no ‘Black Holes’, there is no ‘dark matter’,
comets are not ‘dirty snowballs’, the sun is not a ‘nuclear furnace’.
THUNDERBOLTS challenges our fundamental assumptions about the workings
of the universe, and then offers an alternative vision. Born of
empirical science, this vision is startling in its common sense
simplicity, and stunning in its reach and ability to make comprehensible
both age-old and modern-day mysteries. Recent discoveries in space have
amazed and perplexed scientists. Current popular theories in the
sciences can neither predict nor explain the phenomena we are now
observing. In THUNDERBOLTS, American mythologist David Talbott and
Australian physicist Wallace Thornhill and their associates propose a
new theory which can both predict and explain these phenomena. 5,000
year old rock art, the origins of world mythology, planetary history,
spectacular nebular forms in deep space, and high energy electric
discharges in the plasma laboratory -- all are inextricably linked by
the Electric Model. In an extraordinary synthesis of the scientific
disciplines THUNDERBOLTS presents us with an astonishing new perspective
on ancient history and leading-edge astronomy.
Evolution - the Missing Link to Abortion
Thirty-five years ago this week, America joined the ranks of nations
engaging in the genocide of its own people. In 1973 the U.S. Supreme Court
launched an all-out assault, this time not on a religious or ethnic group,
but on victims with no voice, no defense, and no allies. It marks the day
that, under the pretense of privacy, the womb became an unfair battlefield
for the unborn.
The beginning of America’s toleration for abortion can be traced back to the
mid-1800s. It was in 1860 that German college professor Ernst Haeckel, just
finishing Darwin’s Origin of the Species, left his physician
practice for the study of embryology. So convinced by what he read, Haeckel
became one of the most zealous advocates of Darwinism in the nineteenth
Nine years later, with no real evidence for evolution, Haeckel devised
sketched charts of human developmental stages. By 1875, Haeckel was
convicted of fraud in a trial held by his own university. There he admitted
to faking his drawings in an attempt to show similarities between the human
embryo and that of animals. But today, many biology textbooks still include
these charts, purposefully deceiving thousands of students, with no mention
of their fraudulent history.
Click to view a two-minute video on this great cover-up.
Despite Haeckel’s conviction, his drawings paved the way for the murdering
of the unborn. If a human life is nothing more than an animal, it’s no
wonder the textbooks refer to the unborn as a mere “blob of tissue.”
Haeckel’s sacred cow of evolution is the well-hidden and underlying missing
link to abortion.
America often mourns the horror of September 11, 2001 when nearly three
thousand lives were tragically taken, yet keeps silent as more than four
thousand lives are stolen each day through this evolution-influenced
terrorism called abortion. We protest the casualties of war—yet turn our
heads away from the 50 million innocent victims of Roe v. Wade. As
Christians continue to stand on the sidelines, the Bible is unwavering; God
ordained each of us in the womb (Jeremiah 1:5). Christians, it’s time to
take a stand –it’s time for a change.
Dr. Hovind’s seminar addresses various flaws of
evolutionary thinking that are used in this attempt to counteract intelligent design.
For instance, a major problem lies in the fact that they do not recognize that
Evolutionism is also a belief system. Let us consider the tenets of
this humanistic religion:
Evolution - Around twenty billion years
ago, there was nothing. Then all matter came into being. Where
did it come from? They say it doesn’t matter. Then all that
matter was squashed into an area possibly the size of a period
on a page. This is claimed to be part of Science?
6 parts of evolution
Cosmos evolution - Big Bang The
dot got hot and was spinning and then - BANG! Gas (hydrogen and
a little helium) spread throughout the universe.
Chemical evolution - From those
first two chemical came all the rest of the elements?
Stellar evolution - Then, the
gases defy Boyle’s gas law (He was the Father of Modern
Chemistry, by the way, a creationist) by compressing themselves
into galaxies, planets and stars. Gas doesn’t like to squish.
What is making it squish?
Organic evolution - Life from
non-life. This was proven impossible by Louis Pasteur (greatest
microbiologist and also a creationist). If it is impossible
today, what makes us think it was possible back then?
Macro-evolution - Change from
one kind to another. Never observed by man.
Micro-evolution - Change within
kind. This is not true evolution, but merely variation within it
kind. See the poodle, great dane, collie, bulldog, some variety,
but all dogs. They don’t turn into frogs.
Only the last of the 6 is part of science, and it
sides with the repeated Scripture passage, “after his kind.” All the
rest are religious. They must be believed. It takes more faith to
believe in evolution, than in creation.
I believe that the evidence for creation is so
strong, that (according to Romans 1:20) those who reject the Creator
and Savior of mankind “are without excuse.” Both Creation and
Evolutionism are based on Faith. When you look at real science, it
actually agrees much better with the Scriptures than Evolutionism.
But the followers of Evolution lie and claim their viewpoint is
actually science. How ludicrous to say that matter made itself. God
tells us He made the universe.
Most of the branches of scientists that we study
today were founded by men who believed in Creation. Additionally,
there are many scientists today that also believe in a young earth
creation and the Bible. You can look for information on this at
It has been said that no real scientist would
reject creation if it was a reasonable theory. So let’s look at Sir
Julian Huxley. He was a grandson of Thomas Huxley,) who is called “Darwin’s bulldog.” Thomas was Darwin’s biggest promoter.
Sir Julian was a biologist, and a world leader in promoting
evolution ideals. Don’t you think with that background, he’d have an
idea of what he was talking about? The year he died (1975), he was
asked in a TV interview, “Why have so many scientists been so quick
to adopt Darwin’s theory of evolution?”
Rather than respond with a scientific evidence or
logical argument, Sir Julian replied, “The reason we scientists all
jumped at The Origin of Species was because the idea of God
interfered with our sexual mores.” The source for this quote is
called The Collapse of Evolution, by Scott M. Huse pg.157
Julian’s brother Alduous has a very similar quote
in pg.270 of his book Ends and Means, “I had a motive for not
wanting the world to have a meaning...For myself, the philosophy of
meaninglessness was essentially an instrument of liberation, sexual
and political.” You can look up the whole quote.
It is a good question. If there is no Creator,
where do we find the standard of what is right and what is wrong?
How big the world is can be shown through
measurement and science. But evolution is not proven. The fact that the universe has all its stars,
comets and galaxies punctures a hole in the “big bang.” If the
theory calls for the matter (which they say was Hydrogen and Helium)
to disperse evenly, there should be no clumps of anything according
to Boyle’s gas laws. No planets, comets, galaxies, stars, earth,
etc. This is a big problem for the “big bang.” Evolution struggles
against the laws of science. If only they would realize: “There are
laws; there must be a Lawgiver!”
God says “...he made the stars also” (Genesis
Let’s take a closer look at organic evolution:
Evolutionists have a problem when it comes to life...
They believe that non-living matter can become
living. This was a common belief in the days of Darwin. It was
considered that flies spontaneously come from rotten meat, and that
rats will arise from piles of dirty rags. But Louis Pasteur, a great
scientist in biology and microbiology disproved that belief. Life
comes from life.
Today in public schools, he is lauded and
applauded. Spontaneous generation was proven false, the students are
told. Then they are taught that spontaneous generation DID happen
millions of years ago. Why should we think that something impossible
now was possible then? How does that follow scientific reasoning?
And they don’t let the students know that Louis Pasteur believed in
creation as stated in Scripture and believed on Jesus as Saviour
from sin. Pasteur vehemently opposed Darwin’s theory, as did many
other great men of science, including his friend Henri Fabre, the
“Father of Entomology (study of insects).”
To be educated, you should look at both sides of
the issue and make a wise choice of what to believe. Most people in
the world are only exposed to the Evolution viewpoint, and thus are
not truly educated. They are indoctrinated, which is different. I
believe that when you look at science, it actually points to the
accuracy of God’s Word. Louis Pasteur, this man through whose
research (in diseases and immunization) hundreds of thousands of
lives have been saved, said of science, “A little science estranges
men from God, but much science brings them back to God.”
Now, we must understand that the EU stance on
Creation is not new. There has been a long war against the truth of
Creation. People do not want to answer to a Creator, so they deceive
themselves and others into thinking there is no Creator (Romans
1:20-22). They get fooled into thinking that:
- Evolution is part of science.
- The Bible is not to be considered for
- Evolution is needed to be able to fight
disease, etc. (how ridiculous!)
- That real scientists do not believe in
creation as stated in the Bible.
- Christian fundamentalists are dangerous to
- The Bible does not have the answers.
What can be done about it? Here is a list of what
to do in response to the EU stance on creationism. The best way to
get armed in this form of battle is to make sure YOU are ready:
Make sure you know the Creator,
Jesus Christ (John 1:1-3;12) as your Savior from sin (John
Stay close to Him, spending daily
time in prayer and Bible study. Wisdom comes to those who ask
God for it (James 1:5) and search His Word (Psalm 119:98).
Follow the instruction of Psalm 1. Walk with godly friends
(Proverbs 13:20). Be an example to those around you (I Timothy
Pray for those in the EU (I Timothy
Equip yourself with knowledge about
the controversy. Get good books and videos so you can learn, so
that you can share (II Timothy 2:2). You can order many tools
from us, if you like. Here are just a couple...
7 part Creation Seminar DVD set from us -
(watch closely, holding a copy of the EU statement) it
covers many points that the EU try to make.
The Long War Against God, by Henry Morris
- backtracks the history of this war, so you know the
Are you in Europe, Phillip? If so,
then it is your duty to make known your stand with those who
hold office above you. That is true, no matter what nation you
are in. Evil prevails when good men do nothing. The leaders need
to know what their people think. If nobody calls, or voices
their opinion, the official will think everyone agrees with the
said platform. Either that or he/she will believe the public
don’t think it is that important. God is looking for someone to
stand in the gap (Ezekiel 22:30). Will you be that man? In you
are not in Europe then do the same for your own nation. Keep up
with your congressmen, get to know them, pray for them, share
information with them, show proper Christian respect, and keep
Speak out. Share with all you can
about the truth that evolutionism is actually not science but a
religious world view, and let them know about evidence of
creation and the Bible. Give them places they can learn for
themselves (for example on the web:
The EU is not the enemy (though
they may be working for him). Have as your goal to introduce people
to the truth so they will turn to the Creator and be saved from
Hell. If one is saved, it is a great victory!
1. The aim of this resolution is
not to question or to fight a belief – the right to freedom of
belief does not permit that. The aim is to warn
against certain tendencies to pass off a belief as science.
It is necessary to separate belief from science. It is not a matter
of antagonism. Science and belief must be able to coexist. It
is not a matter of opposing belief and science, but it is necessary
to prevent belief from opposing science.
(my comments highlighted below) Evolution is a belief,
not science yet that is allowed to be taught. At least the Bible
tells the Truth about the history of mankind and our future.
However, in a doubting and self-indulgent and self-centered
generation that message is not acceptable. There’s a reason God
gave us the Law, as
shadows of Love. Evolution is based on the
method that only believes what is measurable or perceived
with the five senses. This eliminates the spiritual realm,
even though it’s a daily part of life and manifest in the
individual actions of each person in their environment. There is
no proof of evolution, no fossil record showing evolution
between animal kinds. In fact their whole dating system is
circular dating the fossils from their layers and the layers
from the fossils found in them. These layers were caused by the
global flood they deny because if it is true then there is a God
and consequences for actions. Aleister Crowley’s “motto of do
what thou wilt” has just added onto this
spirit of iniquity working to deceive mankind. If they would
examine the actual scientific physical evidence they would see
that the stories of the Bible are true. Ron Wyatt found
chariot wheels at the
bottom of the Red Sea and Mt. Sinai in accordance with the
literal reading of God’s Word.
2. For some people the Creation,
as a matter of religious belief, gives a meaning to life.
Nevertheless, the Parliamentary Assembly is worried about the
possible ill-effects of the spread of creationist ideas within our
education systems and about the consequences for our democracies. If
we are not careful, creationism could become a threat to human
rights, which are a key concern of the Council of Europe.
A threat to human
life? God created the heavens and the earth when He spoke them
into existence. Everything we see and hear is the result of
frequencies on the Electro-Magnetic spectrum. Frequency is how
we communicate with our voice. Our eyes cannot perceive all of
the spectrum and our ears cannot hear it all either, yet it is
there. We can measure it with scientific instruments. How much
more of what is can we not see or hear? I AM is beyond our
perception and our very ability to perceive is because He is. “I
AM” is a statement of existence. Our visible three dimensions
and the fourth of time are all a part of existence, yet He is
bigger than time and space and dwells outside of time. It is His
handiwork that our “science” is slowly uncovering, yet we puff
ourselves up and imagine a world that could have been without
Him. There is no existence outside of Him but the place prepared
for the fallen angels and you do not want to get your wish of an
eternity without God, He will grant your desire. Be careful what
you wish for because you may just get it.
3. Creationism, born of the
denial of the evolution of species through natural selection, was
for a long time an almost exclusively American phenomenon. Today
creationist ideas are tending to find their way into Europe and
their spread is affecting quite a few Council of Europe member
Prove the evolution of
species through natural selection with any scientific evidence.
4. The prime target of
present-day creationists, most of whom are of the Christian or
Muslim faith, is education. Creationists are bent on ensuring that
their ideas are included in the school science syllabuses.
Creationism cannot, however, lay claim to being a scientific
I would say the same
thing about the evolutionists trying to force their theories
without proof on children that go against the evidence of the
Truth in the Biblical record seen in the Grand Canyon and in
Biblical stories with archaeological evidence.
5. Creationists question the
scientific character of certain areas of knowledge and argue that
the theory of evolution is only one interpretation among others.
They accuse scientists of not providing enough evidence to establish
the theory of evolution as scientifically valid. On the contrary,
creationists defend their own statements as scientific. None of this
stands up to objective analysis.
6. We are witnessing a growth of
modes of thought which challenge established knowledge about nature,
evolution, our origins and our place in the universe.
So we should combat new
more detailed understanding because it undermines the incomplete
knowledge of those that examined the universe by such limited
means? Didn’t they say the earth was flat? God’s Word always
said it was round.
Isaiah 40:22 It is He that sitteth upon the
circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof
are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth
them out as a tent to dwell in:
But that’s all foolishness,
right? How about
String Theory or the
Electric Universe model. These both greatly challenge modern
science through greater ability to see the unseen universe
through experimentation and mathematics. But science is too
proud to admit wrong and too willing to be without God to admit
to discovering His handiwork. I feel sorry for them.
7. There is a real risk of
serious confusion being introduced into our children’s minds between
what has to do with convictions, beliefs, ideals of all sorts and
what has to do with science. An “all things are equal” attitude may
seem appealing and tolerant, but is in fact dangerous.
8. Creationism has many contradictory aspects. The “intelligent
design” idea, which is the latest, more refined version of
creationism, does not deny a certain degree of evolution. However,
intelligent design, presented in a more subtle way, seeks to portray
its approach as scientific, and therein lies the danger.
9. The Assembly has constantly insisted that science is of
fundamental importance. Science has made possible considerable
improvements in living and working conditions and is a rather
significant factor in economic, technological and social
development. The theory of evolution has nothing to do with divine
revelation but is built on facts.
10. Creationism claims to be based on scientific rigour. In reality
the methods employed by creationists are of three types: purely
dogmatic assertions; distorted use of scientific quotations,
sometimes illustrated with magnificent photographs; and backing from
more or less well-known scientists, most of whom are not specialists
in these matters. By these means creationists seek to appeal to
non-specialists and spread doubt and confusion in their minds.
11. Evolution is not simply a matter of the evolution of humans and
of populations. Denying it could have serious consequences for the
development of our societies. Advances in medical research, aiming
at combating infectious diseases such as Aids, are impossible if
every principle of evolution is denied. One cannot be fully aware of
the risks involved in the significant decline in biodiversity and
climate change if the mechanisms of evolution are not understood.
12. Our modern world is based on a long history, of which the
development of science and technology forms an important part.
However, the scientific approach is still not well understood and
this is liable to encourage the development of all manner of
fundamentalism and extremism. The total rejection of science is
definitely one of the most serious threats to human and civic
13. The war on the theory of evolution and on its proponents most
often originates in forms of religious extremism closely linked to
extreme right-wing political movements. The creationist movements
possess real political power. The fact of the matter, and this has
been exposed on several occasions, is that some advocates of strict
creationism are out to replace democracy by theocracy.
14. All leading representatives of the main monotheistic religions
have adopted a much more moderate attitude. Pope Benedict XVI, for
example, as his predecessor Pope John-Paul II, today praises the
role of science in the evolution of humanity and recognises that the
theory of evolution is “more than a hypothesis”.
15. The teaching of all phenomena concerning evolution as a
fundamental scientific theory is therefore crucial to the future of
our societies and our democracies. For that reason it must occupy a
central position in the curriculums, and especially in the science
syllabuses, as long as, like any other theory, it is able to stand
up to thorough scientific scrutiny. Evolution is present everywhere,
from medical overprescription of antibiotics that encourages the
emergence of resistant bacteria to agricultural overuse of
pesticides that causes insect mutations on which pesticides no
longer have any effect.
16. The Council of Europe has highlighted the importance of teaching
about culture and religion. In the name of freedom of expression and
individual belief, creationist ideas, as any other theological
position, could possibly be presented as an addition to cultural and
religious education, but they cannot claim scientific
17. Science provides irreplaceable training in intellectual rigour.
It seeks not to explain “why things are” but to understand how they
18. Investigation of the creationists’ growing influence shows that
the arguments between creationism and evolution go well beyond
intellectual debate. If we are not careful, the values that are the
very essence of the Council of Europe will be under direct threat
from creationist fundamentalists. It is part of the role of the
Council of Europe’s parliamentarians to react before it is too late.
19. The Parliamentary Assembly therefore urges the member states,
and especially their education authorities to:
19.1. defend and promote scientific knowledge;
19.2. strengthen the teaching of the foundations of science, its
history, its epistemology and its methods alongside the teaching of
objective scientific knowledge;
19.3. make science more comprehensible, more attractive and closer
to the realities of the contemporary world;
19.4. firmly oppose the teaching of creationism as a scientific
discipline on an equal footing with the theory of evolution and in
general the presentation of creationist ideas in any discipline
other than religion;
19.5. promote the teaching of evolution as a fundamental scientific
theory in the school curriculums.
20. The Assembly welcomes the fact that 27 academies of science of
Council of Europe member states signed, in June 2006, a declaration
on the teaching of evolution and calls on academies of science that
have not yet done so to sign the declaration.
Proves Creation - Samuel J. Hunt wrote a book on the
scientific proof that God spoke the universe into existence. This page has
additional conversation taken from Prophecy News Watch.
Evangelism - Kent Hovind presents the common-sense,
scientific evidence of a 6,000 year-old earth and creation as well as the
flood and what affects that has on what scientists believe they see. You can
view his 7 DVD series free online at YouTube. I’ve put them all together in
order on my DVD resources page
Glorious Creation [Part
Truths That Transform
(January 22-23, 2008)
- Just how flimsy is the case for evolution? Even
Darwin himself said, “Not one change of species into another is
on record.” So why do his followers continue to support his
crumbling theory? Find out, on Truths That Transform with Dr. D.
Genesis - Ken Ham takes the Bible literally. His
world view is based on the assumption that the Bible is the word
of God and is infallible. The mission of his Answers in Genesis
ministry is “to bring reformation by restoring the foundations
of our faith which are contained in the book of Genesis.”
Don’t Walk - I was raised going to church, and at the
age of 14, my respected Biology teacher taught the class that
the Theory of Evolution was true. I believed him without any
question. At the age of 26, I got a few facts on Creation, then
did further investigation, and now I am convinced Creation is
better science than the Theory of Evolution.
Be not overcome
of evil, but overcome evil with good. Romans 12:21
Watchman Bible Study | 2005 - 2011 Site Map
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work herein is archived under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in reviewing the included information for personal use, non-profit research and educational purposes only. Ref.