| |
Vision of Daniel 9
70 Weeks for Israel and Jerusalem TL;DRThe Babylonian captivity coming to an end as prophesied by Jeremiah, Daniel prays with a spirit of repentance and supplication to God for the forgiveness of his people and Jerusalem. The answer comes to him through the angel Gabriel to provide one of the most precise and expansive prophecies tied to God’s plan for Israel and Jerusalem from the rebuilding of the city to the reign over it by the Messiah some 2,500 years later. While the entire prophetic scope of the prophecy is delivered in just four short verses, we must not forget the context in which it was given and about whom it was given. This is a prophecy pointed explicitly to Israel, Jerusalem, and God’s relationship with them in terms of His footstool on Mount Zion from where He meets with them. This includes the timing of the arrival of the Messiah and the events around which He returns. The recognized centrality of this prophetic passage has been interpreted through the lens of many paradigms to bolster different views of timing regarding its fulfillment. Its characters have been defined in many different ways and even the order of the verses have been switched around to support different views. My goal in this study is to take scripture as written, in the order written, accepting that God says what He means and means what He says. The interpretation will be focused on and taken from scripture itself to leave as much of my own interpretation out of it. My goal is not to support a paradigm, but to understand what God’s answer to Daniel regarding the future of his people and Jerusalem means, according to God. While there is not a lot of text to the actual prophecy, there are a lot of detail embedded within it. And with the benefit of hindsight, we are witnesses to the glory of God’s Word and evidence of His atemporal nature and omnipotence. Unlike the great prophets that came before us and delivered to us God’s Word, we have a great gift in being able to look at history to see this prophecy, that is only partially fulfilled, and understand both what it meant historically and what it will mean in our future. Prophetic ScopeWhile the scope of this prophecy covers a 490 year period of time appointed to Israel and Jerusalem, it is broken up into a 49 and 434 year period totaling 483 years from 457 BC to 27 AD. It is after this period that the death of the Messiah is prophesied as well as the destruction of Jerusalem prior to the completion of the prophecy with the final 7 years yet to begin. It should be noted that at the time Daniel received the vision of this prophecy, Medo-Persia had just conquered Babylon and everything in this prophecy was yet future to Daniel. For us living within the time of partial fulfillment, we get to examine history and see the accuracy of what is fulfilled to bolster our faith in what is not yet fulfilled. Prophetic Characters
Fulfilled Prophecy Triggers ProphecyDaniel recognized the prophesied 70 years was accomplished according to Jeremiah 25:1-13, 2 Chronicles 36:15-21, and Jeremiah 29:1-11 and he repented and gave glory to God. So it was given to Daniel to know the future of his people and holy city. It was his recognition of fulfilled prophecy that spurred recognition of sin, repentance, and calling on God’s mercy to keep His promises. Daniel trusted in God’s promise to reunite His appointed people and His appointed place once again after the 70 years had been accomplished. This is an example to us to trust in God’s Word and approach understanding with a heart of humility, repentance, and faith. One of the great things about this vision is it provides a strong foundation upon which to stand in faith on His Word due to the fulfillment of part of this prophecy. And in seeing how precisely it was fulfilled, we can look confidently at what has not yet been fulfilled in this central prophecy around which much of end time prophecy revolves. And just as we can trust God’s Word here, we can take Him at His Word elsewhere in understanding our future. What Daniel received was a prophecy of a coming 483 year period of time. This entire prophecy is clearly focused on Israel and Jerusalem, which is the context for everything it reveals. After this the promised Messiah would establish His kingdom and accomplish His mission to save those that love God by showing the greatest love possible, sacrificing His life for their salvation. This would then be followed by a final 7 year period in which the final trying of Israel would be accomplished and the remnant faithful would enter into the promise made under their anointed King. The fulfillment of one prophecy in the 70 years of desolations for Jerusalem, focused on Israel and Jerusalem, was the trigger for understanding the remaining future of Israel in Jerusalem following God’s statutes given to them. And this is an important point of context in which to view the prophecy as seen in Daniel’s prayer. Daniel’s PrayerWhile it’s tempting to jump to the last four verses in Daniel 9, it’s important to understand the mindset of Daniel in his prayer for Israel and Jerusalem, God’s holy mountain. It also provides critical context for often debated terminology used in the prophecy that can change the whole paradigm of interpretation. I believe it is important that our paradigms be created as much as possible by the text interpreting itself. Of first note is that Daniel was repenting on behalf of his people and recognizing God’s faithfulness in keeping the covenant that Israel had departed from. Daniel 9:3-6, 9-13 Now there are many covenants that God made. Adamic Covenant - (Genesis 1:26-30, Genesis 2:16-17, Genesis 3:15), Noahic Covenant - (Genesis 9:8-17), Abrahamic Covenant - (Genesis 12:1-3, Genesis 13:14-17, Genesis 15:1-21, Romans 4:9-22), Mosaic Covenant - (Exodus 24:1-12, Deuteronomy 11, Deuteronomy 28:15-68, Leviticus 26:14-46), Land Covenant - (Deuteronomy 30:1-10), Davidic Covenant - (2 Samuel 7:8-16, Luke 1:31-35), and the New Covenant - (Jeremiah 31:31-34, Matthew 26:28, Hebrews 9:15) Given the context of Daniel’s prayer, it is pretty clear what covenant was on Daniel’s mind that God upheld and Israel sinned against. This is an important context to hold onto for the rest of the study. Israel’s sin, iniquity, wickedness, and rebellion in departing from God’s precepts and judgements are directly tied to the law of Moses. And we can see the blessings and curses being referred to in Deuteronomy. Deuteronomy 11:26-32 This is expanded upon in greater detail in Deuteronomy 28:15-68. These blessings and curses laid upon Israel according to their faithfulness to God follow Deuteronomy 9 where Israel worships the golden calf as they await Moses to return from atop Sinai and Moses breaks the first tablets written by God for His people. Deuteronomy 10 contains the rewriting of the tablets. The laws and statutes Israel has sinned against are clearly those of the Mosaic Covenant. What is on Daniel’s mind in his prayer is the Mosaic Covenant to which Israel agreed to at Sinai. Exodus 19:7-8 | Exodus 24:3 He recognized Israel’s unfaithfulness and the promised curse being poured out upon Israel because of their unfaithfulness. Yet he also recognizes God’s faithfulness as well as God’s mercy and promise to return Israel in 70 years, according to prophecy. What is interesting for later in the prophecy is that Daniel states that “the curse is poured upon [Israel].” This word, nāṯaḵ H5413 (וַתִּתַּךְ), is also used in context of “that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.” We’ll get into that later. But this isn’t just about Israel. He also recognizes Jerusalem, and Mount Zion, as directly tied to his people and desires God to remember His holy habitation and His promises. Why are these so tied together? The answer is relationship. The mercy seat, the footstool and earthly throne of God, within the tabernacle is where communion with God happened. Exodus 25:21-22 At first it was a mobile tabernacle until Solomon built a house for the Lord on Mount Zion. While it was only the high priest who once a year entered the most Holy to sprinkle the blood of the offering on the mercy seat of the Ark of the Covenant where God’s presence rested, it was the door of the tabernacle before the altar of sacrifice where the appointed people were to meet at the appointed times at this appointed place. And this is tied to the daily to be done throughout Israel’s generations. Exodus 29:42-46 This is why Israel and Jerusalem are tied together, because God does not forget His covenants and desires relationship with a humble, obedient, and repentant people that love Him and each other. Daniel’s humble and repentant heart of faithfulness is beloved by God, and Daniel’s love for God and his people brings skill and understanding of a vision regarding the future of Israel and Jerusalem. Just as Daniel saw his people and city inextricably linked, so God’s response given to Daniel tied them together. This is an important context we will see in determining what periods of time the weeks can be applied to. Scope of the 70 WeeksDaniel 9:24 70 WeeksSeventy is pretty self-explanatory as is weeks, but most people really only deal with weeks of days, or seven days. The Hebrew word used is shâbûwaʻ H7620 (שָׁבוּעַ) a period of seven, a heptad, from where the weeks of days are derived and the Sabbath day of rest on the seventh day. In the appointed times for Israel, the heptad was also used of weeks for Shavuot, the feast of weeks. Christians know it as Pentecost, or pentēkostḗ G4005 (πεντηκοστή), the fiftieth day, though unfortunately the connection is lost on many to its Hebrew roots. Leviticus 23:15-16 As I touched on in the Daniel 8 study, the central appointed time that determined the whole year to come was Firstfruits, or the Wave Sheaf offering (Yom HaBikkurim). This was because the firstfruits of the harvest had to be ripe to offer to the Lord and this had to be determined 15+ days earlier in order to determine the first month of the year. It always had to occur on the day after Sabbath within Unleavened Bread (Chag HaMatzot) because Pentecost (Shavuot) was to be on the day after the Sabbath after seven weeks of weeks had passed, 49 days. This made the day after the 50th day, or Pentecost. Interestingly, it is also celebrated as the time during the Exodus when Israel received the ten commandments at Sinai. Exodus 19:1-2 Passover (Pesach) was on the 14th of the first month of Abib/Nisan when Israel began to flee Egypt. The same time in the midst of the third month would have been about two weeks of the first month, plus four weeks of the second month, plus a couple weeks of the third month. This would be around the time of Pentecost (Shavuot) following the flight from Egypt. So here we see the first Pentecost where the Spirit of God descended on Mount Sinai like a fire and Moses went up to meet God and receive His commandments. About the same time over a millennia later, the Spirit of God descended as tongues of fire over the heads of the early church and the Gospel, the fulfillment of the Law, was conveyed in all languages that the hearers needed to hear. But I digress. But we also have an example from scripture of a heptad being applied to years in the jubilee, which we will also see in the weeks of years coming up in this prophecy. Leviticus 25:8-10 The point is that we can detach the counting of days from the term translated as weeks here because it more appropriately points to a group of seven, a heptad. What denomination of time is attached to those seven is determined by the context of the prophecy. Seventy sevens of days is 490 days and will not fit as it is much too short a period of time. Seventy sevens of weeks is 490 weeks, or 3,430 days and is likewise too short. Months are not really calculated in this way while years are, and getting into decades and centuries is much too long a period of time. As we get into these seventy weeks, it will become clear that years is the time period being referred to with great accuracy. Israel and JerusalemThe most clearly stated yet sometimes overlooked context to this prophecy is that it’s explicitly stated to be for Daniel’s people, Israel, and Daniel’s holy city, Jerusalem. This means everything this prophecy contains is directly related to these two identities. This makes sense because Jerusalem is where Mount Zion is, God’s chosen habitation where He promised to meet with His people in their obedience to His statutes. This frames everything that follows and explains why there is a gap in this prophecy between the first 69 weeks of it and the final 70th week, which we’ll get into shortly. But first let’s take a contextual look at the other scoping elements of this prophecy. To Finish the Transgression
The transgression is masculine singular absolute, and in the context of Israel and Jerusalem it is seen throughout the Old Testament as Israel, dwelling in Jerusalem, would waffle between faithfulness and unfaithfulness, obedience and rebellion. In the terms of the figurative marriage language of God’s covenant relationship with Israel, she was at times adulterous and playing the harlot going after false gods and transgressing the covenant she agreed to at Sinai. Part of this transgression has to do with following the statutes God gave them to keep throughout their generations, the works of the Law. Yeshua made it clear that even in His time 2,000 years ago many of the religious leadership honored God with their lips, but their hearts were far from Him. Yet they followed the statutes that were only possible with a temple in Jerusalem. Since 70 AD this has not been possible, and even in 1967 when Israel first re-captured the Temple Mount, they gave up sovereign control of it to the Waqf and to this day they lack the location on Mount Zion to build the tabernacle required to keep Torah properly throughout their generations according to the Word of God. But the action to this transgression speaks of a finishing of it. In other uses it implies an active restraining or withholding of it. In the context of Israel and Jerusalem, this implies a change of heart from both the secular state of Israel today and even an eternal faithfulness that would prevent future transgression of Israel against God. Hosea speaks to the contrasting of the unfaithfulness of Israel in Hosea 2:1-13 while the remainder of the chapter speaks to her future restoration. Hosea 2:14, 16-17, 19-20, 23 Ezekiel 37:21-23 Isaiah 35:4-5, 10 Zechariah 12:10 Revelation 1:7 There is a time coming, yet future, when Israel will finally open their eyes and see Yeshua as their Messiah. The recognition is said to happen at Yeshua’s parousia, or second coming, but the ultimate fulfillment must include Jerusalem as well, which will not be perfected until the end of the 70th week. It is then, upon the ashes of the destruction of the harlot city, the eternally faithful city of the Messianic Kingdom will be built and Israel will no longer defile themselves with false gods and transgressions forever. They will come out of the wilderness into the Promised Land with the Son of Man ruling over them, their God and King. To Make an End of Sins
“And to make an end” is in the context of being paid off. When put together with the sins, it speaks to the completion of the judgements being accomplished according to the time God laid out for Israel if they were not obedient. It is used in similar context in Daniel 8:23 “when the transgressors are come to the full.” So in the context of Israel and Jerusalem, the transgressions being judged for the determined period of time will one day have paid in full and if they don’t continue in rebellion, will stand upright before God again. It may be said that Yeshua’s death on the cross is the making an end of sins, but because of the context of Israel and Jerusalem, as with the continuing in transgression and not accepting Yeshua as the Messiah, the end hasn’t been made to their sins. That is incumbent upon them to not continue in sin, yet their eyes remain closed. So this would seem to be around the same time frame of the return of Yeshua and their blindness being lifted so that they accept the Messiah they have rejected for 2,000 years and enter into His rest. It is in this that the sins will cease and the judgement for them complete. Romans 11:25-27 To Make Reconciliation for Iniquity
A common theme in the first three statements of scope for these 70 weeks is transgression, sin, iniquity. Related to Israel and Jerusalem they are to be finished and made an end of, but a just God must deal with rebellion, sin, and iniquity in order to be just. We can see from even a secular point of view how when lawlessness is allowed, it quickly grows out of hand unless it is judged and sentenced. Yet there is an eternal nature to judgement of an eternal being, which mankind is. This is ultimately what mankind needed to be saved from, the eternal righteous judgement of a holy God. But even though without the shedding of blood there is no remission of sin, Hebrews 9:19-28, it is also not possible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sin, Hebrews 10:1-4, only temporarily cover them to allow communion with a holy God. The sacrificial system is not a reconciliation for iniquity, it is a remembrance of it. Therefore, in order to truly make a lasting atonement and pardon from judgement for iniquity all men bear, a New Covenant was required. Just as the animal sacrifice had to be without spot or blemish physically, the greater sacrifice had to be without spot or blemish spiritually. Hebrews 9:13-18 A man with no sin must offer Himself selflessly. John 15:12-17 When Moses pleaded for his people when God was going to disinherit them in their faithlessness, and we see Moses make a statement that speaks to ongoing judgement for iniquity through generations. Numbers 14:17-19 This is something quite different from what came with Yeshua’s sacrifice, where individuals have faith in His sacrifice and have a personal relationship where their iniquity is forgiven as they remain obedient and the Spirit of God dwells with them in their temples of flesh. The cleansing through the atonement of the blood of the Lamb of God was accomplished on the cross. So I believe that this has been accomplished in 30 AD, though not fully realized by those of Israel that have closed their eyes to it. However, the reconciliation was made and is available to each individual at whatever time they come to believe and obey. To Bring in Everlasting Righteousness
“To bring in” is to cause to come about and is pointing to perpetual moral uprightness. The finishing of transgression and making an end of sins is one side of the same coin as bringing in everlasting righteousness. One side views stopping the negative and the other is starting the positive. In the context of Israel and Jerusalem I see them as pointing to the same time when rebellion ceases so that faithfulness can remain, and this doesn’t happen until after Israel sees and accepts Yeshua as the Messiah. When the kingdom is restored to Israel and led by their King, perpetual righteousness will begin in His reign. To Seal Up the Vision and Prophecy
“To seal up” is meant to fasten up by sealing, in this case a book of vision and prophecy. Isaiah 29:10-11 We will see in the next study a similar idea related to prophecy being sealed for a later time, a kind of shutting up of understanding of its meaning until the time in which it is revealed. Daniel 12:4 It’s likewise used both literally and as prophecy when Jeremiah was imprisoned by Zedekiah for prophesying the Babylonian capture and destruction of Jerusalem. God had Jeremiah literally purchase land as a sign of the prophesied return of Israel to the land after 70 years. This same concept of sealing of a document like a deed is used. Jeremiah 32:9-15, 44 The sealing of a document requires the completion of it, to document all that it is meant to have contained. In the context of Israel and Jerusalem and the sealing up of the vision and prophecy, we would be looking for the last vision of a prophet having completed the prophetic narrative intended for us to have. There can be no doubt that John’s vision documented in the book of Revelation is that final vision and prophecy that completed the cannon of scripture. While understanding of the visions and prophecy were effectively sealed up, we do of course have a physically unsealed Bible from which we gain understanding. While there is disagreement as to whether the 70 weeks was all fulfilled historically or is still waiting fulfillment, I feel it is very clear that the sealing up the vision and prophecy was not fulfilled until after 95 AD and I believe this is confirmed by Irenaeus and Eusebius, not because they were trying to, but because of off-hand comments made while making other points. “We will not, however, incur the risk of pronouncing positively as to the name of Antichrist; for if it were necessary that his name should be distinctly revealed in this present time, it would have been announced by him who beheld the apocalyptic vision. For that was seen no very long time since, but almost in our day, towards the end of Domitian’s reign.” | Against Heresies (Book V, Chapter 30), Irenaeus (130-202 AD) In speaking of not naming the antichrist, Irenaeus specifies that John received the vision recorded in Revelation toward the end of Domitian’s reign, who was emperor of Rome from 81 to 96 AD. This was a comment secondary to the focus of the message, he wasn’t trying to prove a dating for John’s vision. “[70] The Greek Olympiads … [81] 215th [81 A.D.] - Hermogenes of Xanthus, stadion race. [During this Olympiad] Domitian became emperor of the Romans. …” | Chronicle (Book 1), Eusebius (260-339 AD) “In the Chronicle, Eusebius lists these events in the fourteenth year of Domitian: ‘Persecution of Christians and under him the apostle John is banished to Patmos and sees his Apocalypse, as Irenaeus mentions.’ Eusebius also records that ‘ancient Christian tradition’ held that John had been banished under Domitian:” | 2.11.4.2 - External Evidence for a Late Date “But after Domitian had reigned fifteen years, and Nerva had succeeded to the empire, the Roman Senate, according to the writers that record the history of those days, voted that Domitian’s honors should be cancelled, and that those who had been unjustly banished should return to their homes and have their property restored to them. It was at this time that the apostle John returned from his banishment in the island and took up his abode at Ephesus, according to an ancient Christian tradition.” | Church History (Book 3, Chapter 20:10-11), Eusebius (260-339 AD) Irenaeus and Eusebius, decades to centuries after John’s vision, point to a time toward the end of Domitian’s reign of 15 years where John is banished to Patmos and later sees the vision written in Revelation. So if we give some space to that, say 94-96 AD, the final vision and prophecy was given to John. There are views that make the claim that all of the 70 weeks was fulfilled historically. These range from having the 70th week centered at 167 BC to 30 AD to 70 AD and fully completed. However, since the temple was destroyed in 70 AD, there is no way that Daniel 9:27 could be fulfilled because that would mean the vision and prophecy had to be sealed up by 73 AD at the latest according to that view, yet it was 8 years later that Domitian’s reign started and the end of his reign was up to 22 years after the destruction. It is my contention therefore that the final week of years could only have come after the first century had closed out, but the events depicted in it could not because Israel was not in the land, in control of Jerusalem, nor was there a temple to either start the daily nor take it away in the midst of the seven years. As we will get into later, there is also the case that the end of the wars depicted before the 70th week begins ended well after John’s vision was given. So while the sealing up in terms of the final prophetic record being given was done around 95 AD, the fulfillment of what was written is yet to be completed, and the unsealing of understanding it is still unfolding. It is within the 70th week that much of Revelation will be fulfilled. To Anoint the Most Holy
“To anoint” speaks to the smearing of anointing oil or blood, depending on the context. Mashach is the root of Mashiach, anointed one. Anointing oil was poured over the heads of priests and kings to anoint them in their roles and the blood of the sacrifices was smeared, anointed, on the horns of the altar and sprinkled on the mercy seat of the Ark of the Covenant on Yom Kippur, among other temple vessels. “The most holy” is actually the masculine singular of qôdesh, or holy, followed by the masculine plural of that same word, in other words holy of holies. This phrase occurs 24 times in 23 verses and speaks of the most holy place behind the veil of the sanctuary where the Ark of the Covenant was and the consecrated most holy things offered and used to minister in the temple. Holy means sacred, or set apart. The holy of holies is the most set apart place, or the inner chamber of the temple where the Ark of the Covenant rested, overshadowed by the two cherubim stretching their wings from wall to wall and the two stretching their wings over the mercy seat of the Ark. Only the high priest entered this with much incense once a year to sprinkle the blood of the Yom Kippur offering made for the people onto the mercy seat. It would seem to me that since the sacrificial system existed well before the prophecy, and Yom Kippur continued until 69 AD, this particular scope has a different meaning. While never used physically for this purpose, the mercy seat of the Ark of the Covenant represented a copy of the Ark in heaven, it was the footstool of God on earth. Perhaps it is Yeshua consecrating the temple built after His return by taking His seat in the throne room on Mount Zion in Jerusalem to reign during the Messianic Kingdom. As we saw in Exodus 29:42-46, it was the presence of God that sanctified the sanctuary, priesthood, and people originally. This doesn’t necessitate the original Ark of the Covenant that is said to be remembered no more at that time, just the King enthroned in His temple. Jeremiah 3:16-18 So the anointing of the most Holy will see its ultimate fulfillment around the completion of the 70 weeks determined for Israel and Jerusalem, when Yeshua’s presence as King and High Priest will fill the temple once again on Mount Zion and consecrate it and His people with whom He is in relationship with perpetually. These six actions set the scope for the prophecy, it cannot be finished until all six of them are finished. As you can see there is a definite sense that this is not fully accomplished yet and that some part of our future will bring about great changes that will fulfill God’s Word. While there is some fulfillment and partial fulfillment, the ultimate conclusion is that the 70 weeks will not be completed until Yeshua returns on the clouds of heaven and begins His reign on earth as recorded in the final vision and prophecy given to John. 69 WeeksDaniel 9:25 The three main parts of this prophecy are pretty well isolated in the final three verses given to Daniel. This first part covers a period of sixty nine sevens, or 483 years. We are given a definitive starting point, the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem’s streets and walls, and the end at the arrival of the Messiah the Prince. Going Forth of the CommandmentIn 539 BC, after learning his name had been prophesied around 150 years before in Isaiah 44:21-45:6, Cyrus ordered the building of the temple. Ezra 1:1-11 In 518 BC, the decree of Darius I was a recapitulation of the decree of Cyrus because of locals hindering the rebuilding. They wrote a letter to him asking if Cyrus had really allowed the rebuilding. Ezra 5:6-17 The search was made and the response given in Ezra 6:1-17. Again, this speaks only to the temple, although it does hint at the troublesome times the Jews were having in just building the temple at the time. It was in the sixth year of the reign of Darius I on the third day of Adar, February 19, 516 BC (Julian), that the temple was completed. Ezra 6:15 In the seventh year of Artaxerxes, 458-7 BC, the third decree was sent, but the significance of this requires going back a little earlier when the adversaries of Judah and Benjamin wrote a letter to Artaxerxes attempting to get him to stop their work building the city of Jerusalem. The temple had already been completed, but the city had not. Their scheme to get his command to stop was a warning of damage to the revenue of the kings. Ezra 4:13, 20-21 It worked, they convinced the king to command the halting of all work to rebuild the city until another command was received by Artaxerxes. But then in the seventh year of Artaxerxes, fall of 458-7 BC, he sent Ezra with his decree, which explicitly reversed his previous decree to stop building the city because of toll, tribute, and custom. Ezra 7:13-18, 24-26 And so we see explicitly stated that Ezra left Babylon on the first day of the first month, Abib/Nisan, and arrived in Jerusalem on first day of the fifth month of Av, exactly 5 months to the day. He was to take the wealth and offerings to God at the temple in Jerusalem and the remainder of the money to be used for whatever they willed, without toll, tribute, or custom. The cause for the command to stop building Jerusalem in his previous decree was explicitly reversed in his second and even allowed for the financing of building the city up once again. Ezra 7:6-10 If the seventh year of the king was from the fall of 458 to fall of 457 BC, the month of Abib that Ezra departed Babylon would be March 26, 457 BC. (Julian) And he would have arrived in the summer on July 22, 457 BC. (Julian) And while the decree of the king was made before Ezra’s arrival with it, the going forth of that decree is tied to Ezra’s delivery and regional execution of it. Until it arrived and was heard to be executed, it was not in effect. Furthermore, Ezra was prepared to teach the statutes and judgements in Israel, which seems an appropriate time to mark the beginning of the 70 weeks prophecy with Judah and Benjamin back in the land with the temple and being taught and led according to the statutes of God. Just over two months after his arrival would begin the fall appointed times. There is debate as to whether the Persian reckoning of the regnal year on Abib/Nisan is the reference point for the beginning of Artaxerxes reign or the Hebrew civil calendar of Tishri in the fall was. This fall to fall reckoning of regnal years is indicated in scripture itself as something Ezra and Nehemiah held to. Nehemiah 1:1 Nehemiah 2:1 From Nehemiah’s reckoning, both of these refer to the 20th year of Artaxerxes. The first reference was in the 9th month of the year, Kislev, when Nehemiah was grieving over the continued destruction of the walls and gates of Jerusalem. It is after hearing of this that Artaxerxes notices Nehemiah’s sadness in the 1st month of the year, Abib/Nisan. If the reckoning of Artaxerxes 20th year was in the spring, there is no way this order of events would fit because Nehemiah’s sadness would have been recognized in the 21st year of Artaxerxes if it was reckoned on Abib/Nisan 1 each year. It therefore follows that the Biblical authors of that time reckoned the reigns of the kings over them according to their fall to fall reckoning of regnal years. I learned the above explanation from about a third of the way through The Going Forth of Artaxerxes’ Decree Part 1 and about half way through The Seraiah Assumption and the Decree of Daniel 9:25 article. These are part of a great and very detailed series of articles under the title The Daniel 9:24-27 Project by Rick Lanser, MDiv. There are other more complicated reasoning from history in addition to this one point from scripture itself regarding this timing that have convinced me of the validity of this dating. I would highly recommend their study for deeper understanding on the dating and other issues surrounding this prophecy. While some of the ultimate conclusions seem to contradict some of points leading to it regarding the year of the crucifixion, the scholarly details are nonetheless invaluable for study. So the command of Artaxerxes would likely have been made in the seventh year of his reign, starting in the fall of 458 BC, at some point prior to Ezra’s departure from Babylon on Abib/Nisan 1, 457 BC. And “the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem” would have been upon delivery and dissemination after his arrival at Jerusalem on Av 1, 457 BC. And as we can see from Nehemiah in the 20th year of Artaxerxes 13 years later, the walls and gates had still not been completed yet because of those coming against the Jews in their progress. And so “the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times” is an apt description of the time of the rebuilding of the walls and streets of Jerusalem after the first 69 weeks of years had begun. Seven Weeks and Sixty Two WeeksAn interesting aspect of this first 69 weeks is that it’s divided into a period of 7 weeks, 49 years, and 62 weeks, or 434 years. These are tied together, but is there a reason that the text doesn’t just say threescore and nine weeks? From Ezra’s trip to deliver the kings commandment allowing the rebuilding of the city in 457 BC plus another 49 years would bring us to 408 BC. The statement that “the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times” following the 7 and 62 weeks would seem the most logical reason to speak of the 49 years separate from, but part of, the first 69 weeks of this prophecy. Nehemiah 5:14, 16 Nehemiah 6:15 While debated and not solidly known, Nehemiah speaks of being governor from the 20th to the 32nd year of Artaxerxes, translated to 444 - 432 BC during which he continued working on the wall. This seems a little early to be focused on just the rebuilding of Jerusalem’s streets and walls being completed, though it may be that construction wasn’t fully completed for another couple generations. Perhaps there is another context that falls around this time, which is the writing of the prophets. Malachi is the last prophet before the 400 silent years, the intertestamental period. This is likewise not a clear timing, but is believed to be around the time of Nehemiah as well. Matthew 17:1-3, 9-13 Matthew 11:12-14 It is an interesting idea that the last prophet of the Old Testament would point to the first of the New Testament as his very last statement before the silent years, and it being known through the land around the time of the completion of the first 49 years of the 490 years appointed to Israel and Jerusalem. Malachi 4:4-6 So while I don’t have any precise answers for this distinction of the first 69 weeks, it does seem to coincide generally with Israel being back in the land with the city and temple rebuilt for the second time and the last Old Testament prophet pointing to the first New Testament prophet approximately defining the intertestamental period. The Messiah the PrinceWe’ve established the starting year of 457 BC, with Ezra’s departure on Abib/Nisan 1 and arrival on Av 1 with the command of Artaxerxes to no longer impose the toll, tax, or custom that prevented the building of Jerusalem by his previous command. The end of this period of time is said to be the Messiah the Prince, Mashiach Nagid. If you do a study on the Messianic prophecies, the expectation is that an anointed King will be crowned from the line of David that will rule over Israel. 2 Samuel 7:12–16 | Isaiah 11:1 | Jeremiah 23:5–6 The Jewish expectation is founded in the Tanakh, the same Old Testament in which Christians see Yeshua, but it was written in such a way that it is both true and a stumbling block. Even His disciples, after His resurrection, expected Yeshua to establish His physical kingdom in Israel and throw off the shackles of Rome Acts 1:6-7 Yeshua didn’t deny that the kingdom would be restored to Israel as prophesied, just that they need not concern themselves with that because their mission was focusing on building the kingdom several millennia before that time would come. But as we saw in the establishment of the kingdom of God during the ministry of Yeshua in Daniel 2, His first coming was as a suffering servant, to make reconciliation for iniquity. Luke 17:20-21 So our expectation for the arrival of the Messiah the Prince would be tied to the beginning of His ministry when the kingdom of God, or kingdom of heaven, is established. If we add 483 solar years to 457 BC, we come to 27 AD. (BC-AD Calculator) Now this is a fascinating thing because Ezra began his journey on the first day of Abib/Nisan in 457 BC and arrived on the first day of Av toward the end of July. 483 years later John the Baptist was likely beginning or in his ministry to prepare the way for the Messiah. Yeshua was about 30 years old when He began His ministry, Luke 3:23, and He was born in the fall. He was baptized and then went into the wilderness for 40 days. I find it interesting that the 40 days leading to Yom Kippur is called the season of teshuvah, or repentance. While He didn’t have anything to repent of, He was tested during this time, His hour of temptation, and it was after coming out of that time that His ministry began. Luke 4:14-21 There are debates about the count of jubilee years, but the point of this time was to proclaim liberty throughout the land of Israel, returning of property and indentured servants to their families. What Yeshua left out of this prophecy from Isaiah when He stopped reading mid-sentence subtly speaks to the expectations they were to have regarding the Messiah. Isaiah 61:1-3 What follows the day of vengeance of our God is the restoration of the kingdom to Israel under their eternal King, the Word made flesh, Yeshua. Out of a terrible time of mourning, destruction, and ashes, Israel will come out of the wilderness into the promised land to dwell in the promised time of peace and joy they have long desired to see. It’s almost as if He declared the two stages of His coming, first to set the captives of death free by making reconciliation for iniquity in His death and resurrection, and second to tread the winepress of the wrath of God in the day of vengeance. Isaiah 63:1-6 | Revelation 19:11-13 The purpose of that time is to eliminate the enemies of God that come against Him so that His kingdom will be established in peace. Through this time of destruction by fire, God’s people will be refined as gold is refined to come out of that time as His most precious possessions. Isaiah 13:9-12 And so we see from Ezra’s journey to Jerusalem to teach God’s statutes and properly follow them, the clock of weeks began ticking. The first 69 weeks paused at the arrival of the Messiah and beginning of His ministry, the stone cut without hands establishing His kingdom to be given to the Gentiles in the unbelief and closing of the eyes by His chosen people. There are some popular interpretations that attempt to apply a 360 day prophetic year to determine this span of time. While there is clearly several exact-day prophecies that align 1,260 days with 42 months and 3.5 years giving an allusion to a 360-day year, I believe this misses the fundamental nature of the appointed times for Israel on a lunisolar calendar. Yes, the lunar calendar is shorter than the solar calendar and their average is about 360 days, but the harvest is more tied to the seasons determined by the solar calendar and the vernal equinox to which the grain crops are tuned. While there are variations in months in some years, the seasons to which the appointed times are determined are consistent and tied to the sun. What is an even more fascinating study is seeing the precision with which these exact-day prophecies can fit within patterns of the Metonic cycle and tie appointed times for the spring and fall together across these to the day. For instance, did you know that over a fifteen year period 1,260 days before Yom Kippur will fall within a day of firstfruits ten times? And 1,260 days after falls on Abib/Nisan 1 about nine out of fifteen times? Because the three and a half years, or forty two months associated with this time period can span years with a thirteenth month, it’s not consistent, but it repeats within a cycle. So it may be that the lunisolar calendar to which the appointed times are tied, likewise ties events separated by exact days such that pivotal prophetic events will fall on these appointed times. But that is for another study. So while we may not be able to define the first 69 weeks to the day with the information that we have, we can quite literally narrow it down to the season. Ezra’s arrival in the summer of 457 BC very likely coincides with John the Baptist’s ministry 483 years later in the summer of 27 AD. And the time following Ezra’s teaching of the statutes of God leading to Tishri 10, Yom Kippur, could very well tie in with Yeshua’s baptism, 40 days and nights in the wilderness, and the beginning of His ministry at the age of 30 that fall, 69 weeks of years later. The GapDaniel 9:26 As we will see, the final week begins in the next verse while we are left with the first 69 weeks having ended before several pivotal events take place. This implied gap of time in the weeks tells us that all 70 weeks are not contiguous. Rather, the first 69 heptads are split from the 70th by some unknown period of time. Messiah Cut OffIt is important to recognize, in a plain reading sequentially through this prophecy, that it is after the 7 + 62 weeks have been completed that the Messiah is cut off. The first 69 weeks began with the command to rebuild the streets and walls of Jerusalem in the summer/fall of 457 BC and ended with the arrival of John the Baptist in the spirit of Elijah and the Messiah in the summer/fall of 27 AD. But we know His ministry lasted several years before His death and resurrection. How long Yeshua’s ministry lasted gets into a whole other study that requires background on the appointed times of Israel and understanding the Biblical record and history. The common view is that Yeshua’s ministry was 3.5 years long, primarily due to a lack of belief He could have accomplished everything written in a shorter time and different dating of other Biblical events. What I discovered in my study is that the Passover of 30 AD is the only year within the appropriate range that can fulfill the only sign given that generation by Yeshua, the sign of the prophet Jonah. Matthew 12:38-42 There are many misconceptions about what is commonly called good Friday. When John speaks of the body of Christ not remaining on the cross into a high Sabbath in John 19:31, it’s commonly taken to mean the weekly Sabbath, or Saturday, and therefore it is accepted by many that the crucifixion was on Friday. But what is a Sabbath really? Exodus 20:8-11 The Sabbath is defined by God as a time of rest where no work is to be done. But Sabbath’s were not always determined by days of the week, that was only one of several times where no servile work was to be done. In the appointed times, the first and last day of Unleavened Bread were high Sabbath’s, and those are tied to the day of the month, which shifted each year throughout the days of the week in the lunisolar calendar. So no matter what day of the week Passover took place on, the next day was always a high Sabbath day because it was God’s appointed time for Israel in which they could do no work. Five of the appointed times contained seven additional high Sabbaths.
We know Yeshua was raised on early Sunday morning. Matthew 28:1 | Mark 16:1 | Luke 24:1 | John 20:1 For Him to have been in the tomb for three days and three nights as He said He would be, His crucifixion would have had to have been on a Wednesday and the first day of Unleavened Bread, the high Sabbath, on Thursday. Several other things I won’t get into now point to this same timing. John details only three Passovers during Yeshua’s ministry. The first is John 2:11-13, the second is John 6:1-4, and the third is the Passover of His crucifixion in John 11:55, John 12:1, John 13:1, John 18:28,39, John 19:14. Assuming no unmentioned Passovers by John, this would mark a two and a half year ministry from its beginning in the fall of 27 AD to Passover of 30 AD. There were a lot of Sabbaths that year over that week surrounding Yeshua’s death and resurrection, Thursday, Saturday, Sunday, and Wednesday. (See chart of crucifixion timeline) So we see that the Messiah is cut off for others 2.5 years after the first 69 weeks are complete, yet we have not gotten to the final week yet. Destruction of the City and SanctuaryThe beginning of this prophecy was promising a return of Israel to the land and re-establishment of the relationship between God and Israel on Mount Zion. Yet we see in this second event to take place in the gap is the destruction of the city and sanctuary. We are told that the people of the prince that will come are the ones that destroy them. Who is the prince that will come, and by implication his people? First we must remember to whom this vision of the future is being given, Daniel. Every bit of this prophecy is yet future to him, and that is the context in which it is given to him. It is easy at times to read and personalize things, and in this case it has caused what I believe are incorrect interpretations. I used to agree with many of these teachers, holding the paradigms they explained that seemed to make sense. But the more I examined for myself and heard other perspectives, it became clear that I had to drop my paradigms and take God’s Word as seriously as possible. In this case, we know from history what happened 40 years after Yeshua prophesied the destruction of the city and sanctuary, and that likewise came to pass as foretold. Luke 19:41-44 From history we can see that this prince to come in Daniel’s future was Titus, then general under his father Vespasian, Emperor of Rome. He was quite literally a prince of Rome. It is recorded by Josephus that in the siege of Jerusalem and battle for the temple it was not the desire of Titus to utterly destroy it at first. But the zealous rebellion of the Jews against the Romans rule ultimately led to that end. But especially in terms of the temple itself, Titus was not responsible for its utter destruction, his soldiers were, against his orders. “But when Titus perceived that his endeavors to spare a foreign temple turned to the damage of his soldiers, and then be killed, he gave order to set the gates on fire. … And now the soldiers had already put fire to the gates, and the silver that was over them quickly carried the flames to the wood that was within it, whence it spread itself all on the sudden, and caught hold on the cloisters. Upon the Jews seeing this fire all about them, their spirits sunk together with their bodies, and they were under such astonishment, that not one of them made any haste, either to defend himself or to quench the fire, but they stood as mute spectators of it only. … But then, on the next day, Titus commanded part of his army to quench the fire, and to make a road for the more easy marching up of the legions, while he himself gathered the commanders together. … Titus said, that ‘although the Jews should get upon that holy house, and fight us thence, yet ought we not to revenge ourselves on things that are inanimate, instead of the men themselves;’ and that he was not in any case for burning down so vast a work as that was, because this would be a mischief to the Romans themselves, as it would be an ornament to their government while it continued. … So he commanded that the chosen men that were taken out of the cohorts should make their way through the ruins, and quench the fire. … these flames took their rise from the Jews themselves, and were occasioned by them; for upon Titus’s retiring, the seditious lay still for a little while, and then attacked the Romans again, when those that guarded the holy house fought with those that quenched the fire that was burning the inner [court of the] temple; but these Romans put the Jews to flight, and proceeded as far as the holy house itself. At which time one of the soldiers, without staying for any orders, and without any concern or dread upon him at so great an undertaking, and being hurried on by a certain divine fury, snatched somewhat out of the materials that were on fire, and being lifted up by another soldier, he set fire to a golden window, through which there was a passage to the rooms that were round about the holy house, on the north side of it. As the flames went upward, the Jews made a great clamor, such as so mighty an affliction required, and ran together to prevent it; and now they spared not their lives any longer, nor suffered any thing to restrain their force, since that holy house was perishing, for whose sake it was that they kept such a guard about it. … And now a certain person came running to Titus, and told him of this fire, as he was resting himself in his tent after the last battle; whereupon he rose up in great haste, and, as he was, ran to the holy house, in order to have a stop put to the fire; after him followed all his commanders, and after them followed the several legions, in great astonishment; so there was a great clamor and tumult raised, as was natural upon the disorderly motion of so great an army. Then did Caesar, both by calling to the soldiers that were fighting, with a loud voice, and by giving a signal to them with his right hand, order them to quench the fire. But they did not hear what he said, though he spake so loud, having their ears already dimmed by a greater noise another way; nor did they attend to the signal he made with his hand neither, as still some of them were distracted with fighting, and others with passion. But as for the legions that came running thither, neither any persuasions nor any threatenings could restrain their violence, but each one’s own passion was his commander at this time; and as they were crowding into the temple together, many of them were trampled on by one another, while a great number fell among the ruins of the cloisters, which were still hot and smoking, and were destroyed in the same miserable way with those whom they had conquered; and when they were come near the holy house, they made as if they did not so much as hear Caesar’s orders to the contrary; but they encouraged those that were before them to set it on fire. As for the seditious, they were in too great distress already to afford their assistance [towards quenching the fire]; they were every where slain, and every where beaten; and as for a great part of the people, they were weak and without arms, and had their throats cut wherever they were caught. Now round about the altar lay dead bodies heaped one upon another, as at the steps 16 going up to it ran a great quantity of their blood, whither also the dead bodies that were slain above [on the altar] fell down.” | Wars of the Jews Book 6 Chapter 4 Verses 1-6 (selected text), Josephus So the city and sanctuary were destroyed by the army of Titus the prince in 70 AD, 40 years after the crucifixion and resurrection of Yeshua who prophesied it. What is interesting is that the siege began around Passover in 70 AD, so really almost exactly 40 years after. It was over 43 years after the first 69 weeks are complete, yet we have not gotten to the final week yet. From 70 AD until now it is not possible that the 70th week could be fulfilled because this prophecy is for Israel and Jerusalem. Following the destruction and diaspora the people as a nation were no longer living in Jerusalem, no longer keeping Torah, and no longer had a city or sanctuary to do so. The final week not only ties Israel and Jerusalem together, but also the existence of a temple and daily sacrifice taking place in it. Unto the End of the WarThe Jewish-Roman Wars were a series of revolts by the Jews against Rome that began in 66 AD, leading to the destruction of the city, sanctuary, and the diaspora. They continued until 135 AD when the Jewish revolts against the Romans were put to an end. And so we can see in the statement following the destruction of the city and sanctuary, “the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined,” points to the ultimate completion of the diaspora of the Jews into the nations and crushing of the remaining rebellion by the Roman Empire. While the Jewish-Roman Wars were over long ago, the aspects that were required to start the first 69 weeks have yet to exist for the final week. Israel had to be in the land and controlling Jerusalem. A temple had been built and dedicated, only then can God’s everlasting statutes for Israel to do be accomplished. So it is now over 108 years after the first 69 weeks are complete, and we are just now getting to the mention of the final week. As things are today, Israel is back in the land and Jerusalem is their capital. However, control of the temple mount was ceded to the Waqf since taking control of Jerusalem after the Six-Day War in 1967 and fear of war in the Middle East due to building the third temple has held back the political forces from moving on this. Since October 7, 2023, it seems a shift in the political resolve has strengthened as a growing Messianic expectation is seen emerging from a largely secular nation. The Orthodox community have been actively working to train the priesthood, build the temple instruments, and prepare everything needed to quickly assemble a tabernacle or temple to return to the statutes God gave them to keep throughout their generations. The red heifers that reportedly contributed to Al Aqsa Flood are a final piece to bring about the consecration necessary to purify the temple instruments and priesthood standing at the ready to return to the Mosaic Covenant in its fullness. The 70th week is a political and paradigm shift away. 70th WeekDaniel 9:27 We’ve been left up to this point with only 69 of 70 weeks defined for us. It is in this final verse of the prophecy that the final week is defined. It is separated from the first 69 weeks in verse 25 by the 43-year span from Christ’s ministry to the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple depicted in verse 26. But even further than that, the end of the Jewish-Roman Wars for which desolations were determined was 108 years after the end of the 69th week. From that point on, Israel has been incapable of returning to Torah fully. Here we see someone confirming the covenant with many for one week. This is defining the context of the completion of this prophecy and the 70 weeks appointed to Israel and Jerusalem. As we will see, the events that are contained within this week point back to echoes from the past, but have not yet taken place. To really prove that out is beyond the scope I’m trying to keep, in focusing on each vision of Daniel and John in isolation, but as the pieces come together in future studies it will become very clear that we have not yet seen the start of the final week of years. Some claim this final week has been fulfilled already, that the whole of this prophecy is complete, tying it to Antiochus IV from 171 to 164 BC, or Yeshua from 27 to 34 AD, or Vespasian and Titus from 66 to 73 AD. There are also partial historical views tying it to Yeshua while only half of the week was fulfilled historically and the other half is yet to come. However, I believe there are serious problems with these various views that I’ve touched on and a prophetic narrative in scripture too broad for this study likewise eliminates that possibility. That the vision and prophecy was sealed up around 95 AD, over two decades after the latest claimed historical fulfillment, is a problem in my view. Perhaps the most obvious issue with these historical fulfillments from a plain reading of the prophecy is that all of these historical times happen before the final week is even mentioned. Gabriel walks through events in time sequentially, meaning all the events from the end of the war in 135 AD and before are historically prior to the final week beginning. There is too much that has not yet happened, events that will not be deniable, that are directly tied to this final week that completes the six scopes that define the duration of this prophecy. HeI’ve come to accept that “he” doesn’t have to be defined by any previous mention in this prophecy and stands alone based on the context and purpose of this verse, depicting the completion of the weeks. If the 70th week stands apart after the gap, so too would the character so pivotal in the events within it. The common view, and one I once held, was to look to the previous person that “he” would seem to point to. That would be the prince that shall come from the previous verse. However, that is reading our place on the timeline into the vision given to Daniel. We are not whom Gabriel was speaking to, Daniel was. The prince that is to come already came, future to Daniel, history to us. In the three cases of “he” being used within the context of the final week of years, something is being done and “he” is implied. What is translated in the KJV as “and he shall confirm,” is in Hebrew gâbar H1396 (וְהִגְבִּיר) “a primitive root; to be strong; by implication, to prevail, act insolently:—exceed, confirm, be great, be mighty, prevail, put to more (strength), strengthen, be stronger, be valiant.” It is written in the causative third person masculine singular, implying the he that is doing the confirming. “He” is also implied in the middle of the verse, likewise written in the third person masculine singular, with what is translated in the KJV as “he shall cause,” which in Hebrew is shâbath H7673 (יַשְׁבִּית) “a primitive root; to repose, i.e. desist from exertion; used in many implied relations (causative, figurative or specific):—(cause to, let, make to) cease, celebrate, cause (make) to fail, keep (sabbath), suffer to be lacking, leave, put away (down), (make to) rest, rid, still, take away.” Similarly someone would need to cause the ceasing of the sacrifice and oblation. Slightly different is “he shall make desolate,” which in Hebrew is šāmēm H8074 (מְשֹׁמֵם) “a primitive root; to stun (or intransitively, grow numb), i.e. devastate or (figuratively) stupefy (both usually in a passive sense):—make amazed, be astonied, (be an) astonish(-ment), (be, bring into, unto, lay, lie, make) desolate(-ion, places), be destitute, destroy (self), (lay, lie, make) waste, wonder.” This is in the masculine singular absolute, again pointing to a man taking an action bringing desolation. I won’t get into all the details here, but Chris White addresses the solitary nature of “he” in Daniel 9:27 in greater detail in his book Daniel (A Commentary), you can just do a search for “he” with the quotes to jump to it. In this one verse we have a man who confirms the covenant, causes the sacrifice and oblation to cease, and causes desolation with abominations. It is disconnected from both the first 69 weeks and the gap that follows it and all three occurrences are within this final week of years determined for Israel and Jerusalem. This should inform us on who he is relating to and where. We are also told in the context of this prophecy for Israel and Jerusalem that once the final week is completed transgression of Israel and Jerusalem will be finished, an end of sins related to Israel and Jerusalem, everlasting righteousness will be brought in, and the most Holy will be anointed. None of these things have been fully accomplished as of today as we are not living in the reign of Yeshua from Jerusalem. There are events that precede that time which every eye will see and judgement will be poured out. We are clearly not yet there. Additionally, one we know as the man of sin will one day stop the daily and sets up the abomination of desolation. As we saw in the historical example in 167 BC, both of these events require a temple on Mount Zion and since 70 AD none has existed. Since the destruction of 70 AD is prophesied in the gap prior to the 70th week, we are left with no Biblical option but to place this week yet future, and so likewise the man who causes the events in this week to take place. Is there a need to attempt to connect this future week back to almost 2,000 years ago if the week was clearly prophesied to stand on its own from the first 69 weeks at least 108 years after they had ended? Does the one who confirms the covenant, ends the associated sacrifice and oblation, and brings desolation in this set apart time of the end require some association with history if other prophecy connect him to the end? Just as verse 27 is separated by a gap of time, so is the “he” it is speaking of separated by several thousand years. Finally, Daniel 9:27 is not the first time a character has been introduced out of the blue after a gap of thousands of years in prophecy. Daniel 11 similarly introduces a third party part way through the chapter out of the blue that becomes the focus of the remainder of the chapter and covers a gap of time as well. And I believe both the gap and identity are tied together between Daniel 9 and 11. We’ll get to that in the later study on Daniel 11-12 and the similarities and differences of the visions of Daniel and John. So let’s not forget the context of Daniel 9:24-27, it is speaking of 70 weeks appointed to Israel and Jerusalem. The first 69 weeks have been depicted in Daniel 9:25-26 leaving only one week of seven years left to account for. Daniel 9:27 stands on its own as that final week we would expect to complete the prophecy of 70 weeks. It’s a short, concise, and critical puzzle piece in the prophetic narrative that tells us the time when many of the other prophecies of the end will be fulfilled within. And the central character causing all these events to happen likewise stands on his own as the man tied to the completion of events in the final week appointed to Israel and Jerusalem. The context and focus of verse 27 is the confirmed covenant. Strengthen the CovenantSo what does it mean for this future man to “confirm the covenant?” We saw confirm means to strengthen, but this would imply something that is already there. What is the subject of this strengthening? Translated as the covenant, the next Hebrew word is ber-eeth H1285 (בְּרִית) “from H1262 (in the sense of cutting [like H1254]); a compact (because made by passing between pieces of flesh):—confederacy, (con-) feder(-ate), covenant, league.” There are several covenants in the Bible, which of them could be considered in a weakened state and able to be strengthened or made to prevail? Recall previously when we went over the covenants and commandments, as well as the context of Daniel’s prayer and confession. The language was all about Israel failing to keep the commandments and breaking the covenant that God had kept. Judah had turned from God and failed to keep the law of Moses and so were receiving the curses that were part of departing from God’s statues. The most logical and contextual possibility of an existing covenant being strengthened is the one Daniel was praying about and repenting for his people breaking and weakening, the one that ties Israel and Jerusalem together, God’s appointed people and God’s appointed place. And that’s what the appointed times were all about, relationship between God and His chosen people. What’s more is that for the Mosaic Covenant and all the statutes given to Israel to be followed properly, it requires both the building of the tabernacle or temple and ministering at it with the daily sacrifice and oblation. Remember that when God gave these statutes to Israel to follow, they were everlasting statutes throughout their generations. Their generations have not ceased from the earth, to the dismay of way too many on the earth, and so neither have the required statutes ceased. And so we look back to what started the first 69 weeks. Ezra 7:8-10 The temple had been completed years prior, many of the Jews had returned to Jerusalem and attempted to rebuild it amidst the constant complications of their enemies trying to stop them. But it wasn’t until Ezra delivered the command from Artaxerxes in the summer of 457 BC that the clock started ticking. But furthermore, it was at that same time that Ezra taught the proper statutes and judgements to the people at Jerusalem to follow Torah properly. The 69 weeks ended with the arrival of the kingdom of God and its King, put on pause for the times of the Gentiles and the spread of the kingdom like a mountain, like leaven, like a mustard seed in the earth. It is my belief that the 70th week will begin for much the same reason the first 69 weeks did, Israel is back in the land, the temple has been built, and the statutes are being properly followed. Deuteronomy 4:27-31 God made a promise here and, like Daniel, I believe it behooves us to believe Him and take Him at His Word. A time is coming when Israel will sincerely seek God with all their hearts amidst much tribulation. God will not forget the Mosaic Covenant made with their fathers. This is said to be in the latter days, and ever since Israel became a nation in the land again her neighbors and most of the world have been against her. Yet as Zechariah 12:1-9 foretold, we’ve seen the tents of Judah saved time and again and Jerusalem once again inhabited. This will eventually lead to their unblinding. What this says is that God will meet Israel where they are at in their blindness, continuing to remember the Mosaic Covenant as they return to obeying it once again. However, there is a critical element not directly in this prophecy that is revealed by Yeshua in the Olivet Discourse. Matthew 24:4-5,11,23-27 | Mark 13:5-6,21-23 | Luke 17:23-24 | Luke 21:8 A great deception is tied to the end before His coming and a great falling away from God to follow another, who is attempting to deceive the elect by claiming the anointing of the Messiah. He is taking the mantle of leadership of the kingdom of Israel, a wolf in sheep’s clothing, and the one who will facilitate the return to God according to His statutes is also the one who will hijack and stop it to steal God’s blind people away from Him. Stopping the DailyWe’ve now seen the apparent initiation of the 70th week in the return to the Mosaic Covenant tied to Israel and Jerusalem in the context of this prophecy. A return to full obedience of God’s statutes necessitates the building of a tabernacle or temple for Him and the statutes toward purification of it through animal sacrifice. But we are told that in the midst of the seven years this man who facilitated the return of the Mosaic Covenant will now cause what he started to cease. What is the subject of this ceasing in the midst of the week? Translated in English as sacrifice and oblation, the next Hebrew words are zebach H2077 (זֶבַח) “from H2076; properly, a slaughter, i.e. the flesh of an animal; by implication, a sacrifice (the victim or the act):—offer(-ing), sacrifice.” and minchâh H4503 (וּמִנְחָה) “from an unused root meaning to apportion, i.e. bestow; a donation; euphemistically, tribute; specifically a sacrificial offering (usually bloodless and voluntary):—gift, oblation, (meat) offering, present, sacrifice.” In all four cases of Daniel’s mention of the abomination that causes desolation, it is paired with the stopping of the daily, or evening and morning sacrifice. But we just saw this “he” was responsible for strengthening the Mosaic Covenant, why would he do that just to stop it later? The common refrain to why this person would start the daily to keep the temple ritually pure and then stop the daily and cause the abominations that make the temple desolate has been a nefarious one. Most view some outside Gentile force deceitfully allowing Israel to return to the sacrificial system only later coming in and persecuting the Jews like Antiochus IV did. This makes sense on the surface, if he was a foreshadow, shouldn’t we expect a repeat? As I pointed out in the Daniel 8 study, I believe we are meant to understand the actions and the spirit behind them. Equating the foreshadow and future echo in every sense is going too far. The actions done in 167 BC as stated were stopping the daily and the abomination of desolation. As Paul points out in 2 Thessalonians 2:1-11, where that person comes from is less relevant than the spirit of the mystery of iniquity behind him. Given the great deception behind the future time, certain expectations must be met. A wolf is immediately recognized by the sheep and they flee. A wolf in sheep’s clothing gives a false sense of safety, making the meal that much easier to attain. So too is a lie most effective when wrapped in truth. The deception surrounds the long awaited anointed king of Israel, the Messiah. This isn’t an expectation without legitimate scripture defining this person, and so to pull off the deception the wolf must appear to be the lamb. Recall that Yeshua warned of deception surrounding a false messiah claiming His authority as the anointed king of Israel and that false prophets would look like a lamb, but speak like a dragon. The whole premise is that to those who have closed their eyes to Yeshua being the Messiah, they are looking at the prophecies and expecting another, which the deceitful Dragon is more than willing to provide. If he can convince them his acolyte is their messiah, then what Yeshua fulfilled takes on a whole new light. Especially when you recognize a death and resurrection is tied to this false messiah. Jeremiah 31:31-34 This was already fulfilled by Yeshua in His death and resurrection, it is the reconciliation He made for iniquity. But imagine one who appears to fulfill Messianic prophecy, not 2,000 years ago, but right here in front of the world. He is killed, but rises from the dead. He claims the authority as the anointed head of Israel and now that he has died for them and lived again, he is their false god living amongst them, the seventh head over Israel is now the eighth. And the mystery of iniquity will be written on the hearts of those who accept him as it is claimed the daily is no longer required because their sins are no more. Just as Christians look to Yeshua as accomplishing this and devoting their worship and lives to Him as God, they will believe and accept this lie and devote their worship and lives to this false god, sealing their fate. If this is truly how the strong deception plays out, it is strong indeed. I can’t imagine the power it will have to pull in the children of Israel, and even some who claim relationship with Yeshua, but their hearts are far from Him. If you think it’s hard to witness to Orthodox Jews now, just wait until they are convinced their promised Messiah is in their midst. They will become clay in his hands to mold to whatever purpose he desires and in their zeal they will follow him and do his will. Those who point this out will be called all kinds of names at first, but that will grow into violence and testing of faith as they are tempted to give up their eternal inheritance for a bowl of stew, or even their mortal lives. True Christians have no enemies they hate, though there are many that will hate them for His namesake. But we are told how we are to live. Matthew 5:43-45 Romans 12:21 Revelation 12:11 The first step to removing the purity from the temple complete, abominations are yet to come that will cause the temple to be desolate of the presence of God so it can be replaced by the presence of another. Overspreading of Abominations Make it DesolateWhat does Gabriel mean by stating that “for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate”? While word searches don’t resolve all things, understanding the context of words used can sometimes introduce clues. Abominations that destroy the holiness, or setting apart, of God’s tabernacle, causes it to be a place where His holiness cannot dwell as it is no longer set apart as He is. To remain set apart He must depart. But what does the idea of overspreading speak to? Overspreading is the Hebrew kānāp̄ H3617 (כְּנַף), “from H3670 (to withdraw, be removed); an edge or extremity; specifically (of a bird or army) a wing, (of a garment or bedclothing) a flap, (of the earth) a quarter, (of a building) a pinnacle.” This is taken by some to be the altar, some the temple, suggesting various locations. But perhaps we can take from the contextual clues and other uses of this word to see another possibility. Isaiah 14:12-15 The mount of the congregation in the sides of the North speaks to Mount Zion, God’s holy hill. It’s tied to the appointed place where God would meet with His chosen people Israel at His appointed times. The Dragon has always desired to elevate himself to that position at that place, to be like the most High in the chosen habitation of the most High. We see this depicted by Paul regarding the end. 2 Thessalonians 2:1-4 At the abomination of desolation depicted in 167 BC, it was an idol on the altar. This was outside the temple itself, yet in the temple complex and likewise caused the destruction of purity facilitating God’s departure from His tabernacle. However, a future time will see the ultimate iteration of this abomination not just placing an idol of a god on God’s altar, but taking the seat on God’s footstool in the most Holy and the man of sin declaring himself to be God and to rule over Israel as the appointed king in God’s chosen appointed place to abide on earth. This place is depicted with the same word for overspreading in the appointed place. 1 Kings 6:23-28 2 Chronicles 3:10-13 1 Kings 8:5-7 These depictions of the most Holy clearly sees a set of cherubims with wings overspreading from wall to wall. What they cover is likewise depicted with the same word for overspreading. Exodus 25:17-22 Exodus 37:6-9 Recall the context of the Dragon’s desire to replace God in His appointed place, deceive His appointed people, and receive worship as God in His temple. Combine that with where God’s presence dwelt, between the cherubims on the mercy seat of the Ark of the Covenant, the seat of God on the earth overshadowed by the cherubims stretching from wall to wall in the most Holy. 2 Thessalonians 2:4 Then it seems that the overspreading of abominations speaks to the wings meant to represent the taking of God’s people under His wings and causing that to withdraw because of the abominations that eliminate the holiness, or setting apart, of God’s abode. 1 Chronicles 28:2 Psalm 99:5 Isaiah 66:1 Ezekiel 10:1-4, 18-19 From all of this it would seem that the overspreading of abominations ties the appointed place of God’s footstool in the most Holy place to the abomination of an idol to be worshiped by God’s people in place of God Himself. This idea of the overspreading of wings was many times used in connection to God’s protection of His chosen people, an allusion to the eternal King ruling over His people. The Israelites wanted a human king they could see to rule over them and fight their battles, which God allowed much to their own detriment. But the Messiah would be the combination of God and man, the Spirit of God in physical form, that would both redeem mankind from destruction and also physically exist in their form amongst them forever, someone they could see, touch, and speak to as a man. Yeshua is the fulfillment of the promised protection of God through His death and resurrection. Jeremiah 31:27-34 Psalm 17:6-9 Psalm 36:7 Matthew 23:37 Psalm 61 What was once to symbolize God’s protection and covering of His people in their obedience to His statutes has been hijacked through a great deception to now symbolize the overshadowing of a new malevolent presence dressed in benevolence, a wolf in sheep’s clothing. The Dragon’s acolyte has replaced God’s promised Son, the Messiah, the Son of man, with the man of sin. This is the abomination of desolation. What was once God’s protection is now the Dragon’s corruption, but many are deceived by it and willingly place themselves under that protection, the overspreading of abominations. This is the return to adultery and harlotry in the most severe and intense period of deception meant to draw away as many of God’s people to destruction as possible and eliminate the rest. But this deception and destruction is not limited to the chosen people, it is global. Isaiah 1:21-28 The Consummation and Cutting Off Poured Out on the DesolateDaniel 9:27 “The consummation” is kâlâh H3617 (כָּלָה) “from H3615; a completion; adverb, completely; also destruction:—altogether, (be, utterly) consume(-d), consummation(-ption), was determined, (full, utter) end, riddance.” This points to a determined end of this time being depicted in the 70th week of Daniel. “And that determined” is chârats H2782 (וְנֶחֱרָצָה) “a primitive root; properly, to point sharply, i.e. (literally) to wound; figuratively, to be alert, to decide:—bestir self, decide, decree, determine, maim, move.” We saw this same word used in the previous verse regarding the desolations determined to the end of the war, speaking of God’s use of the Romans to judge that generation. This same phrase is used elsewhere to speak of a determined destruction on Israel and the land as part of God’s judgement. Isaiah 10:22-25 Isaiah 28:21-22 This man, through his abominations, will make desolate until the completion of judgement that has been determined. We saw earlier in the sealing of the vision and the prophecy the idea of its sealing meaning all the prophecy from God would be considered completed and no more prophets would contribute to what God wanted us to know. It also pointed to the sealing in terms of not understanding or knowing the contents until it is unsealed for our understanding. Ezekiel 2:9-3:4 Revelation 5:1-5 Revelation 10:8-11 Ezekiel saw an unsealed scroll written with lamentations, mourning, and woe on the inside and outside of it and was told to eat it to then speak to Israel, though they would not listen. John sees a similar scroll that none is worthy to open but Yeshua, and it is sealed with seven seals. That this is sealed speaks to the predetermined nature of what is decreed within the scroll. That John then eats the unsealed scroll as Ezekiel did to prophesy to Israel, speaks to the revelation of its contents that John is revealing through the completed testimony of God to the world. This tells us that from the mist of the week until its completion, there will be some kind of pouring out on the desolate that cuts them off. While this may not make much sense on its own, ultimately prophecy is written here a little and there a little, pieces of the puzzle that need to be organized for understanding. Ephesians 5:3-7 We know from Isaiah 63:1-6 that Yeshua will tread the winepress of the wrath of God alone, He is the only one worthy just as He is the only one worthy to break the seals and read what is decreed within the scroll full of lamentation, mourning, and woe. When you look at the day of the Lord, it begins with a period of pouring out of destruction symbolized in censers being cast to the earth, Revelation 8:2-5, ultimately leading to the third woe, the seven bowls, vials, or censers. Recall also how Daniel spoke of the curse being poured upon his people earlier in the chapter. Judgement is depicted this way by John as well in his vision of bowls that fill up the wrath of God being poured out. Revelation 15:1,5-8 There is a determined judgement sealed in a scroll by seven seals that can only be opened by the one who is worthy to carry out the wrath of God. Ezekiel 2:9-10 | Revelation 5:1-7 | Isaiah 63:1-6 | Revelation 19:11-13 The destination of this wrath will be upon those who choose to reject God and accept a false idol, a false messiah, instead. They have put their trust in lies that replaced God, the presence of God they thought they were speaking to will turn out to be the desolation of that presence. In continuing to worship that desolation, they themselves become desolate of His presence, separated from God for time without end and receiving the determined wrath of God poured out on the children of disobedience. 2 Thessalonians 2:6-12 ConclusionThe 70 weeks prophecy for Israel and Jerusalem that was given to Daniel is one of the most central to the time of the end. It is an encapsulating prophecy of the last seven years in which many of the other prophecies surrounding the return of Yeshua take place. It defines the context of this time, a time of Israel and Jerusalem reunited. It is God’s appointed people returning to God’s appointed place, and meeting with Him according to His appointed times according to the Mosaic Covenant and all that entails. That most of the other end time prophecies take place within this context sets the paradigm according to scripture that we need to view end time prophecy through. It also shows Daniel’s faith in God’s Word, having looked at the promise that after 70 years of captivity in Babylon Israel would be restored. Daniel believed this and petitioned God for fulfillment of that promise and was given a vision of the future of His people and Jerusalem. In this we are given an example of how we should trust God’s Word regarding His timing in the precision of the first 69 week period, 483 years from the order to rebuilding the walls and city to the Messiah, even within the same season of the year! The gap we are living in has an unknown length until the time comes that reveals its end. What I find fascinating is just how many other places in scripture speak of a similar gap covering a similar period of time, which I’ll be getting into in the similarities and differences post at the conclusion of this series. Israel, Jerusalem, and the return to the Mosaic Covenant to include a return of the tabernacle or temple are big signs to watch for. All the temple instruments are made and awaiting consecration. The priesthood has been in training for years and awaiting consecration. Rumors of the temple stones being prepared off-site mean the building could be assembled fairly quickly. What is missing now is the hearts of the people for God and the political will to deal with the repercussions of moving forward. While we don’t necessarily know for sure when the 70th week will begin, we can be sure that it will be seven years, in the midst of which the daily will once again be stopped, and abomination of desolation will take place, and the wrath of God will be poured out on those trusting in the desolation that replaced the presence of God. That determined wrath will be completed after which time this appointed time for Israel and Jerusalem will come to a close as the Messianic Kingdom begins. These four short verses, in context of the 23 that came before them, cover an expansive period of history from 457 BC to the Messianic Kingdom in our future. Just enough detail is encoded in these four verses for us to look back through history and see the fulfillment, giving us faith, or trust, in what is not yet fulfilled coming exactly in the way foretold. If you’ve read the previous articles on Revelation 17-18, Daniel 2, and Daniel 8, then you understand how I believe the Bible clearly focuses on Israel and Jerusalem. This will only be reinforced as we continue through the visions of Daniel and John. There is a lot more to come on the events that happen within the 70th week of Daniel, from the unparalleled time of Jacob’s trouble in Judea to the seals, trumpets and bowls and the second coming of Yeshua. I believe there are a lot of misunderstandings about these things and I look forward to sharing the insights I’ve gained from pieces of other’s insights into scripture and searching the scriptures, accepting them as stated in the context in which they are given, and with the whole council of God. 2 Peter 1:19-21 The Bible interprets itself, and the more we approach it that way, the clearer things become as the pieces of the puzzle begin to build off each other and provide a view of the larger puzzle in greater clarity. I hope you will join me on this journey and share with those who are likewise interested in searching for truth. † May God continue to bless you as you remain in Him. |
|
“Be not overcome
of evil, but overcome evil with good.” Romans 12:21 In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work herein is archived under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in reviewing the included information for personal use, non-profit research and educational purposes only. Ref. |