Intelligent Design vs. Macroevolution
This page is a resource for examining the two competing belief systems
surrounding the origin of our world and the universe we live in. I am
not a scientist nor a Biblical scholar with any degrees, I am simply a
mind learning from both
sides to work out my position from those with much more experience than
I. The debate over origins of the material universe and life, on either
side, accept a lot of things by faith.
The scientific community over the past few hundred years has become
more and more antagonistic toward belief in God, departing from many of
their scientific forefathers who found a symbiotic relationship between
faith in God and systematic experimentation and discovery of the
physical world in which we live. I believe modern science has become
proud and arrogant, enforcing a world view they claim cannot abide the
cohesion of science and faith.
Darwin and his Theory of Evolution has become the accepted model,
taught as science in school to the exclusion of any other information
that either calls into question this theory or offers another scientific
model that explains the origins of the world in which we live.
Thanks to the research of people like
Michael J. Behe Ph.D.,
Denton Ph.D. and others in the scientific community as well as
breakthroughs in scientific discovery, we are finding that the cell is
not just a “microscopic lump of jelly-like substance” that is “destitute
of texture” and “destitute of organs” with “no trace of organization.”
Evolution News article) What can really be expected from that time
frame where they had nowhere near the technologically advanced tools
science has brought us to date? What we are actually finding is that the
simple cell houses an incredibly complex group of micro machinery that
reads and duplicates complex code from DNA to build protiens that fold
into shapes necessary for life to exist. So complicated is this
microscopic world of the cell and so detailed the code that it’s
becoming very difficult once you comprehend even some of the details to
believe that random chance and mutation brought about the complex life
we see today.
I think it’s important first to define clearly what is
typically referred to as creation or intelligent design as well as
evolution in the context used on this page.
Creation / Intelligent Design
Traditionally this belief is based on faith in the Word of God. That the God who created it all, and was
the only one there to witness and tell of its
creation, says what He means and means what He says. And that He
revealed this information to His prophets to eventually write down and
pass on for generations through time. While I hold to the accuracy and validity of the Biblical record of creation
by the Creator, this faith-based approach isn’t really going to
convince the scientific crowd or anyone without faith. Science is the knowledge about or
study of the natural world based on facts learned through experiments
and observation. So those who only believe what can be scientifically
proven within the limitations of the natural world tend to have a
difficult time with faith in God, who exists outside of the natural
world of space and time that He created.
What I've become fascinated with is that science itself, in researching how the
material universe works, has come to show time and again that what we see
in the physical world matches with the Biblical record. Whether geology,
paleontology, physics, microbiology, archaeology, etc. we see mounting
evidence that the world is vastly more complex and fine-tuned than we
ever thought. At some point when putting all these together the odds
become imposible for existence without an intelligent mind at the
beginning of and cause of it. Regarding this origins debate
that is where it is very useful.
“Intelligent design is the idea that we can infer from patterns in nature
that some features of living systems are best explained by an intelligent
cause, rather than a stochastic process involving chance and necessity.” | Jonathan McLatchie
For instance there have been many molecular biologists and geneticists
that have come to believe the theory of evolution can’t explain the origin
of information required for life to exist. This area has been deemed the
Intelligent Design (ID) movement, whose focus is on the science aspect
that pointsI would highly recommend watching
the following documentaries that go into much greater detail on this matter,
Origin: Design, Chance, and the First Life on Earth. You can
find more by clicking the related topics button at the top of this page.
Any Biblical researcher should admit that the Bible is not a scientific
book. However it was never meant to be, it was meant to teach the spiritually
young about the reality of the world into which they were physically born and will
die. It was meant to teach spiritual truths that offer its readers the choice
to align with the nature of God or reject Him. It was meant to first reveal
the Law and expose our departure from God (sin) and then explain how that sin would be covered
in the new covenant when we could be reconciled to God for time without
This is commonly the term used when talking about Darwin's theory.
However it should be clarified that there are two main forms of
evolution, one of which is scientific and the other which is just a
theory without the scientific evidence to back it up.
Microevolution is changes that happen within a type, but the
descendant is the same as the ancestor. This variation within a type is
scientifically proven and can be caused by environment or managed
direction. It's what Darwin observed in the Galapagos with the finches
and it's what animal breeders do to produce the best livestock or the
breeds of cats and dogs. However, this scientifically repeatable process
and observation does not produce other types of descendants from their
Macroevolution are changes in type, or kind, where the
descendant is different from it's ancestor such that through a multitude
of changes over a long period of time it is believed that the observed
microevolution turns into macroevolution such that over millions of
years a common ancestor evolved into all the variation of life we see
of macroevolution is more dominant today than in the past, but it also uses science and technology
to back up the philosophy. Now many would possibly be offended to the idea
of evolution being a religious philosophy, but ultimately I think to be
intellectually honest the theory of evolution has an awful lot that has
to be taken by faith and there is a hope that one day science will prove
it, but to date there is no fossil evidence outside of attempts by some
to fake it till they make it.
There are fossils of animals long gone with similar features to other
animals so the assumption is made that it's a transitional fossil, but
it could just as well be a kind of animal that has never lived in
recorded history. The
Archaeopteryx is one of those, believed to be a transition between
non-avian dinosaurs and birds. This is because fossils of this bird were
found and like dinosaurs they had a long, feathered tail and small
teeth. They also had flight feathers and wings like a bird and because
only these two have a fused clavical bone, bada-bing, transition fossil!
Pakicetus is another example from the linked article, where these small
land mammals have the same unique inner ear shape as whales. So
clearly since the only modern animal with a similar inner ear shape as a
fossil, bada-boom, transitional fossil evidence of evolution from a
small land mammal to the largest mammal on Earth!
There is a lot of faith in the theories surrounding the
scientific datapoints discovered through the scientific method and faith
in uniformitarianism, the assumption that the conditions we experience today
have always been the same and remain unchanged through all of time. This
typically denies catastrophic global changes we’re told about in the
Bible that would affect many of those assumptions.
2 Peter 3:3-7
Knowing this first,
that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their
own lusts, And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since
the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning
of the creation. For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the
word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the
water and in the water: Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed
with water, perished: But the heavens and the earth, which are now,
by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day
of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.
Any scientist should admit that we still have a lot to learn about the
material world, but one of the great things about true science is that mistakes
may be made but so will new discoveries. That is, if the scientific community
remains intellectually honest. Science, by definition, can only examine
the material world and so has its hands tied in even thinking outside that
box. So for the atheist, and also the anti-theist, science is a way to puff
oneself up and look down on those ridiculous people who trust an old dusty
book and imaginary sky God. The idea that science is on their side tends
to magnify this pride and help ramp up the mockery.
For the Bible believer, science is a tool to logically experiment within
the physical reality we live in, but it will never be able to prove or disprove
a creator who existed before and outside of the very space and time that
science is restricted to. However I think Stephen C. Meyer’s work in
his books building case for the intelligent design of life that he developed in Signature
in the Cell, Darwin’s Doubt
Return of the God Hypothesis, is bringing scientific principals of
uniform and repeated experience to point to a source of all that
information that builds and holds together the physical world we
“In every case where we have a finely tuned system, whether it’s a
French recipe or a mechanical internal combustion engine, we have
traced back to its source, and we always come to a mind.” | Stephen C. Meyer
Ultimately I believe both sides can see the same
evidence extracted scientifically, but as the blind men and the elephant,
each side is locked into a paradigm enforced by either faith in God's Word
or the assumption of uniformitarianism and chance. One has an eyewitness
and the other limits their thinking to the physical world they can test,
and so denies the existence of the eyewitness and the veracity of His Word
on the matter.
Because of this I don't really expect either side of the argument to
collapse, but it is important to dispell the misconception that Christians
or the Bible they put their faith in are anti-science or that they are somehow
unqualified to utilize science to build their faith. While evolutionary
scientists can look at the geologic column and date the fossils they find
there by the layer they appear in, so too can Christians look at modern
catastrophic events and science to see the global layers of sediment and
the fossils they contain as evidence for the global flood.
The Spiritual Effect
I believe that the
falling away from faith in the end times is in part due to the theory
of evolution. It attacks the very foundation of God through supposed “higher
reasoning.” In reality, the religious belief of evolution has infiltrated
the education system posing as real science and leading young impressionable
minds away from God.
The effects of evolution can remove moral standards and promote the “do
what you want” mentality because according to evolution, we’re
all here by chance and when we die its over. In the words of
Aleister Crowley, “Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the
Law.” Why would one not take full advantage of the time they have?
And with the motto of today being “look out for number one,”
it’s not difficult to see how this core belief system can destroy
the fabric of society if there is no solid foundation as God gave us in
His Word. This is all part of the plan in the works by the spiritual wickedness
in high places that I cover briefly in the
History of the Mystery of Iniquity.
Of course not everyone who holds the theory of Evolution falls into that
trap, but a shockingly large number of people have been murdered through
recent history with some form of the theory used as an excuse by dictatorial
regemes. If there’s no abosolute moral code then the only repercussions
are temporal and if one sees themselves as the fittest, then survival should
be persued at any cost.
Furthermore, the evolutionary principles led to Nazi textbooks showing
illustrations teaching that black people and Jews were a lower evolved species
having “racial features” similar to primates. This dehumanizing
of different races and the attempts to purify a master race led to mass
exterminations of the “inferior races” and the handicapped during
WWII. He was attempting to implement practices to enhance survival of the
fittest by eliminating survival of what he considered unfit. Hitler is attributed
with the deaths of at least 17 million people, excluding direct war casualties.
Among those were 6 million Jews.
“We humans have transgressed the law of natural selection in the last decades.
Not only have we supported inferior life-forms, we have encouraged their
propagation. The offspring of these sick people looked like this. ...
where thousands of drooling imbeciles must be fed and cared for -- individuals
lower than any beasts.” | Victims
of the Past (Opfer
der Vergangenheit) Nazi propaganda film, 1937
“The German Furer...sought to make the practice of Germany conform to the
theory of evolution.” | Sir Arthur Keith
Hitler’s was not the only atheist regeme responsible for massive
death. Joseph Stalin was responsible for the deaths of 23 million people
excluding direct war casualties. Mao Zedong was responsible for the deaths
of at least 78 million people excluding direct war casualties. Pol Pot was
responsible for between 1 to 3 million deaths out of the 8 million population
during his four-year premiership. This last century was the bloodiest in
human history at the hand of genocidal mass-murdering governments. While
evolution isn’t directly to blame, it’s clear that atheism and
lack of accountability to a higher moral standard was.
People may point to atrocities through history done in the name of religion
and say it’s an unfair comparison, they did it too. In the case of
Christianity, any atrocities committed were inconsistent with the teachings
and therefore unfair to place that blame on Christianity. There have been
many horrible things done by people claiming to be
Christians, but by their fruits you will know them. (Matthew 5:39 |
While not all evolutionists are amoral, the foundation of the belief
rejects the source of our morals (God) for a naturalistic explanation that
requires no restraint. Whether one that holds to the theory of evolution
or rejects the existence of God places certain moral restraints on themselves
or not then becomes a personal choice with no higher order.
“Evolution destroys utterly and finally the very reason Jesus’ earthly
life was supposedly made necessary. Destroy Adam and Eve and original
sin, and in the rubble you will find the sorry remains of the son of
God...and if Jesus was not the redeemer who dies for our sins, and this
is what evolution means, then Christianity is nothing.”
| G. Richard Bozarth, American Atheist
“We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its
constructs…because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism…Moreover,
that materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the
door.” | Professor Richard Lewontin,
Evolutionary biologist Harvard University
“No ultimate foundations for ethics exist, no ultimate meaning in life exists,
and free will is merely a human myth.”
| Dr. Will Provine, Evolutionary biologist
Putting aside the focus on spiritual implications for Darwin’s
generally accepted theory, I’ll just let Darwin himself explain several
Re: Evolution not being scientific
“You will be greatly disappointed (by the forthcoming book); it will be grievously
too hypothetical. It will very likely be of no other service than collocating
some facts; though I myself think I see my way approximately on the
origin of the species. But, alas, how frequent, how almost universal
it is in an author to persuade himself of the truth of his own dogmas.”
| Charles Darwin, 1858, in a letter to a colleague
regarding the concluding chapters of his Origin of Species. As quoted
in ‘John Lofton’s Journal’, The Washington Times,
8 February 1984.
Re: Do the facts prove evolution?
“For I am well aware that scarcely a single point is discussed in this volume
on which facts cannot be adduced, often apparently leading to conclusions
directly opposite to those at which I have arrived. A fair result can
be obtained only by fully stating and balancing the facts and arguments
on both sides of each question; and this is here impossible.”
| Charles Darwin, 1859, Introduction to Origin
of Species, p. 2. Also quoted in ‘John Lofton’s Journal’,
The Washington Times, 8 February 1984
Re: General difficulties with the theory of evolution
“Long before having arrived at this part of my work, a crowd of difficulties
will have occurred to my reader. Some of them are so grave that to this
day I can never reflect on them without being staggered...”
| Charles Darwin, (ed. J. W. Burrow),
The Origin of Species (Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books, 1974.),
Re: Evolution is a faith not based on evidence
“When we descend to details we can prove that no one species has changed (i.e.,
we cannot prove that a single species has changed): nor can we prove
that the supposed changes are beneficial, which is the groundwork of
the theory. Nor can we explain why some species have changed and others
have not. The latter case seems to me hardly more difficult to understand
precisely and in detail than the former case of supposed change.”
| Charles Darwin, 1863.
Re: Evolution is impossible
“To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting
the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of
light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration,
could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess,
absurd in the highest possible degree.”
| Charles Darwin, Origin of Species,
1st Ed., p. 186.
Re: Evolution leads to immorality
“A man who has no assured and ever-present belief in the existence of a personal
God, or of a future existence with retribution and reward, can have
for his rule of life, as far as I can see, only to follow those impulses
and instincts which are the strongest or which seem to him the best
ones.” | Charles Darwin, The Morality
of Evolution, Autobiography, Norton, p. 94, 1958
Some more quotes on Evolution
it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could
not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight
modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.”
| Charles Darwin
“I feel most deeply that the whole subject (religion) is too profound for
the human intellect. A dog might as well speculate on the mind of Newton.
Let each man hope and believe what he can.”
| Charles Darwin
“I worked upon the true principles of
| Charles Darwin,
Who is Sir Francis Bacon?
“...Time is the hero of the plot...what we regard as impossible on the basis
of human experience is meaningless here. Given so much time, the impossible
becomes possible.” | George Wald,
“Getting rid of the idea of God freed me up to my erotic desires.”
| Bertrand Russell
“[I suppose the reason that] we all jumped at the origin [of species] was
that the idea of God interfered with our sexual mores.”
| Sir Julian Huxley, Leading Evolutionist
of his day and first Director-General of
“...Darwin’s theory is...no longer a theory, but a fact...Darwinianism
has come of age so to speak. We are no longer having to bother about
establishing the fact of evolution.”
| Sir Julian Huxley, cited in David Noebel,
Understanding the Times
“Evolution is a fact amply demonstrated by the fossil record
and by contemporary molecular biology. Natural selection is a successful
theory devised to explain the fact of evolution.”
| Carl Sagen, The Dragons of Eden
“It is clear that the doctrine of Evolution is directly antagonistic to that
of creation. Evolution, if consistently accepted, makes it impossible
to believe the Bible.” | Sir Julian
Huxley, Leading Evolutionist of his day and first Director-General of
“Today, although many educators play it safe by calling evolutionary ideas ‘theory’
instead of ‘fact,’ there is no reputable biologist who doubts
that species including Homo sapiens, have developed with time, and that
they are continually, though slowly, changing.”
| Isaac Asimov, The Wellsprings of Life
“If all animals and man evolved, then there were no first parents, no Adam
and Eve, no Eden, no fall of man. And if there had been no fall, then
the entire historic fabric of Christianity, the story of the first sin
and the reason for an atonement collapsed like a house of cards.”
| H.G. Wells
“It is absolutely safe to say that if you meet somebody who claims not to
believe in evolution, that person is ignorant,
stupid or insane (or wicked,
but I’d rather not consider that).”
| Richard Dawkins, prominent Oxford scientist
and author. Cited in M. Hartwig, Challenging Darwin’s Myths,
“The German Führer, as I have consistently maintained, is an evolutionist;
he has consciously sought to make the practice of Germany conform to
the theory of evolution.” | Sir Arthur
Keith, Evolution and Ethics, Putnam, NY, USA, p. 230, 1947
Saying to a stock,
Thou art my father; and to a stone, Thou hast brought me forth: for
they have turned their back unto me, and not their face: but in the
time of their trouble they will say, Arise, and save us.
For more examination of the issues with the theory of Evolution, check
out the documentary
Evolution’s Achilles’ Heels. Also, check out
Kent Hovind's Creation Seminar Series for a look at the creation perspective.
Free online e-book:
In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood
Hydroplate Theory Video QuickTime Video
The earth is the
LORD’s, and the fulness thereof; the world, and they that dwell
therein. For he hath founded it upon
the seas, and established it upon the
To him that
stretched out the earth above the waters:
for his mercy endureth for ever.
Dr. Walt Brown’s Hydroplate Theory:
Huge ‘Ocean’ Discovered Inside Earth - Scientists scanning
the deep interior of Earth have found evidence of a vast water reservoir
beneath eastern Asia that is at least the volume of the Arctic Ocean.
Evidence from the Grand Canyon
Notice in the picture above that the Grand Canyon actually runs through
a mountain range. Did water flow uphill millions of years ago? Or is this
evidence of the lake following the flood that was held back by this mountain
range until it overflowed the top creating the Grand Canyon? Similar but
smaller such formations happened after Mt. St. Helens erupted in 1980 and
the formations happened very fast as a result of extreme sudden changes.
The Flood: Evidence Against Modern Theory
Scientific dating from layers of sedimentary rock claimed to be millions
of years when in actuality it was very quickly at the global flood.
Genesis 7:11-12 on that day all the springs of the great deep burst
flood possibly began when the earth’s crust was fractured releasing
subterranean caverns of water and magma. The picture at right shows
the locations of the mid oceanic ridge which resides all over the world,
and are possibly where the earth was globally fractured.
“springs of the great deep” are believed to be
pre-flood subterranean water-table much like those that still exist
today in remnant form. Unknown to many, much of the land under our feet
resides upon massive ancient bodies of water such as the
aquifer pictured at left. The Ogallala Aquifer resides under several
states in the US, and supplies continuous spring water such as the famous
Artesian Wells (et al.
Geysers). It is thought that all land masses were positioned upon
aquifers at the beginning of creation which supplied free-flowing rivers
before the flood. It was these ancient massive aquifers that were triggered
to “burst-forth” and flooded the earth. Even though
these aquifers were largely depleted, today 40% of the drinking water
in the United States comes from these ancient ground waters.
Started the Flood?
According to the Bible, God decided to destroy the earth by flood
because man had become wicked, and in particular due to a race known
the Nephilim. Although the exact mechanism used may never
be known, the event that triggered the breech of the “springs
of the great deep” may have been caused or accompanied by
other catastrophic processes. Evidence of meteor and volcanic activity
is interspersed throughout
the geological column, and it is presumed by some that perhaps a
series of meteor impacts fractured the earth’s crust causing the
pre-flood aquifers to flow unrestricted. It can only be presumed what
actually caused the flood other than the might hand-of-God, but there
were clear and irreversible alterations of both our earth’s crust
and atmosphere as a result of the great flood.
Mechanism of Flood
A portion of the flood water recession was accomplished by glacial formation.
It is almost certain there was proportionally more land available immediately
after the flood than there is currently. The ocean levels continue to
rise today because of melting of glacial deposits that were formed when
the earth was still completely covered in flood water. It is believed
the majority of the glacial development, known as
ice ages, formed during the flood, and was responsible for land
and ice bridges allowing the post flood migration of animals and humans
into regions that are now completely isolated by water (i.e. Bering
Today the earth’s crust has sufficiently uneven
elevations so that about 30% remains above the water line, however,
if the present contour of the earth’s surface was leveled, the
entire planet would still be covered by water to a depth of 9000 feet.
Much of the deformation of the earth’s crust has occurred since
the deposition of
the stratified sediment during the flood. These layers were originally
laid in horizontal rows, and have since been folded and forced upward.
Therefore most of the tectonic activity responsible for mountain building
has been relatively recent, and likely driven by receding flood waters.
Most of the rise in the earth’s land elevation has been due
to plate tectonic activity caused by spreading oceans. The continental
land masses have been essentially crushed, and slabs of crust have been
overthrust or subducted under others causing mountain building, and
volcanism. It is presumed by some creationists, that the majority of
the ocean bodies are settled flood waters, and it is this accumulation
that is driving the spreading of the mid-oceanic ridge and related geological
movement. It is believed the oceans have essentially stretched to accommodate
the accumulation of the expelled subterranean water, and the pressure
of this expanding volume displaced the newly formed layers causing deformations
such as folding, and mountain formation.
So in effect, the pre-flood world was all generally around the same elevation
with no seas. The ocean trenches are where the water broke through the surface
and as the water pressure was released below, the land collapsed under the
water’s surface. What used to be dry land became the ocean floor.
Dr. John Baumgardner also has presented his work related to understanding
the Genesis flood
here. This would seem a more logical conclusion than the earth moving
from these trenches and account for how the earth could be covered and then
the water receded.
This also accounts for the trees found going through geologic column
layers of millions of years. Just as flooding sifts debris today very quickly,
so too are these things accounted for in a world-wide flood. There is also
the clam shells found on mountaintops and the Grand Canyon. More detail
on this at
Answers in Genesis.
I listened to a fascinating episode of
Coast to Coast AM on March 11, 2007 with Wallace Thornhill about the
electrical nature of the universe and past cataclysms. Observations
of the universe and the sun in particular show characteristics of an electrically
charged solar system and universe responsible for solar activity and interaction
between planets and the other solar systems in the Milky Way. This has been
proven further to be true with the August 2007 alignment of the planets
and the effects that could be seen in the weather on the earth.
More on that from James McCanney.
One of the observations was that the surface of the sun is much hotter
than its core and how sunspots show this cooler internal temperature. If
that is really the case, then the core should be the hottest. What this
also shows is how all the celestial bodies in the solar system are linked
There was another video where Stan Deyo discusses gravity waves and how
that causes the orbits of the planets in their resonant paths. See it
here. What is fascinating and links all this together is the understanding
that all of creation is an electro-magnetic illusion of sorts. Our senses
perceive our surroundings by sensing different parts of the electro-magnetic
spectrum. Different frequencies on this spectrum are picked up by different
senses. This is the active, continual voice of God speaking creation into
String theory holds that the smallest particles are little “strings.”
their frequency determines how they interact with each other and combine
to create atomic structures, which combine to create matter. It seems the
whole material reality we know is based in this idea of changing frequency.
Indeed, this idea is seen in the first three verses of the Bible, “In
the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without
form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit
of God moved upon the face of the waters. And
God said, ‘Let there be light:’
and there was light.’” God spoke creation into existence.
The four dimensions in which we reside was not in existence until God said
something. So with string theory, the strings were always there, but until
God spoke creation and began to play them like a musical instrument, matter
did not exist. God controls all strings across all existence and so upon
the beginning notes of His symphonic voice of creation, matter was. I would
The Elegant Universe.
Research: God did speak world into existence World Net Daily (February
A science student in Kentucky says when the Bible records
God spoke, and things were created, that’s just what happened,
and he can support that with scientific experiments. “There are
several documented and currently taught laboratory experiments that
accurately portray the events in Genesis in sequential order, the most
important being that of sonoluminescence,” he wrote.
he described to WND, is the circumstance in which sending a sonic signal
into bubbles in a fluid causes the bubbles to collapse and they release
photons, or create light. That aligns with one of the earlier descriptions
of the creation by God, when, in Genesis 1:1-3, the Holy Spirit moved
upon the face of the deep, which generally is considered water, and
said “Let there be light,” he explained. God was sending
a sonic influence into the waters, and basically creating light, Hunt
He’s documented his theory, and the experiments
he believes back it up, in his “Episteme
Scientia, the Law of All That Is.” Researchers at institutions
no less than UCLA and the University of Chicago have verified the production
of light from bubbles when sound is passed through a liquid, called
Hunt said he was spurred on in his work
because the advanced physics and other courses he was taking were advancing
propositions that sometimes didn’t match up. “The further
I went, the more my questions seemed to be being answered in the Genesis
record,” he told WND. His abstract states, “An examination
of the sequential mathematical and experimental dual proof of the Genesis
record of origins underlying the institution of all that is in the universe
– from waves to matter to the mind.”
Hunt said science
has been proving the Genesis account in classrooms for centuries, “in
spite of the fervency to promote evolution and big bang theories.”
A student at Western Kentucky University in Bowling Green, Hunt said
his questions started very simply. “I asked my professors in physics
and chemistry, ‘What if I could scientifically prove that all
matter was spoken into existence and that all matter could be manipulated
by sound just as Genesis says? Wouldn’t that mean God exists and
created the universe?” he asked. “Nobody’s ever done
that before,” was the response.
His 84-page treatise,
now published, addresses that, he said. Hunt said he believes every
event in Genesis can be observed to be happening daily. “Either
you experience a universe of chaos or a universe of order and processes
that produce immediate and calculable results,” he wrote. “The
results of my research support and prove that everything that exists
was spoken into existence from waves to matter to mind.”
“My professors think my application of accepted laws and theories
may bend the rules a bit, but the ideas are thought-provoking and progressive,”
he said. The website describes the integration of several mathematical
systems including “Phi, Pi, L-systems, Penrose tiling, and an
all-encompassing Koch curve.”
Hunt said his goal was to
be able to provide experiments that would explain the Genesis creation
story – in the order the Bible records events happened. “Some
of my teachers are like, ‘That’s complete hogwash,’”
he said, “while others say, ‘That’s pretty interesting.’”
His goal is to bring a unity to the Christian community, “just
like the founders of our nation expected and wanted from the Constitution.”
The documentation of his processes, Hunt believes, could end debate. “People
want to know the truth, to have something to stand on that’s not
trickery and deceit,” he said. “This gives people something
real to touch, hang on to.”
If you doubt the idea of frequency creating structure, here is a cool
video of an experiment on this very idea. Notice how different frequencies
produce different designs.
Now if we put that together with the idea of
string theory, where “strings” vibrating at different frequencies
produce atomic structure that build the material world in which we live,
and scripture stating God spoke the universe into existence, it begins to
make sense. Even miracles like turning water into wine. If Yeshua can affect
the subatomic frequencies producing the water, in theory He could speak
a new frequency and change the structure and makeup of the water instantaneously.
This next video of Dr. Hans Jenny in his study of Cymatics - study of
matters pertaining to waves.
I think this shows how frequency is a very large part of the universe
and its makeup and operation. Whether Here are some more videos on
sound and it’s effects on matter:
From the video site: DIY! “I took apart a computer
speaker and mounted it with hot glue inside a metal coffee can. Using
sinegen.exe, I created waves that
warped a liquid mixture. I used water and corn starch in a semi-fluid
mixture (not the thickest possible).”
The God Delusion Debate - Audio of the Richard Dawkins - John Lennox
debate regarding Richard Dawkins book titled The God Delusion.
Richard’s website is a proud member of the Rational Response Squad.
Thunderbolts Of The Gods 1:03:51 video
There are no ‘Black Holes’, there is no ‘dark
matter’, comets are not ‘dirty snowballs’, the sun
is not a ‘nuclear furnace’. THUNDERBOLTS challenges
our fundamental assumptions about the workings of the universe, and
then offers an alternative vision. Born of empirical science, this vision
is startling in its common sense simplicity, and stunning in its reach
and ability to make comprehensible both age-old and modern-day mysteries. Recent
discoveries in space have amazed and perplexed scientists. Current popular
theories in the sciences can neither predict nor explain the phenomena
we are now observing. In THUNDERBOLTS, American mythologist David Talbott
and Australian physicist Wallace Thornhill and their associates propose
a new theory which can both predict and explain these phenomena. 5,000
year old rock art, the origins of world mythology, planetary history,
spectacular nebular forms in deep space, and high energy electric discharges
in the plasma laboratory -- all are inextricably linked by the Electric
Model. In an extraordinary synthesis of the scientific disciplines THUNDERBOLTS
presents us with an astonishing new perspective on ancient history and
Evolution - the Missing Link to Abortion
Thirty-five years ago this week, America joined the ranks of nations
engaging in the genocide of its own people. In 1973 the U.S. Supreme
Court launched an all-out assault, this time not on a religious or ethnic
group, but on victims with no voice, no defense, and no allies. It marks
the day that, under the pretense of privacy, the womb became an unfair
battlefield for the unborn.
The beginning of America’s
toleration for abortion can be traced back to the mid-1800s. It was
in 1860 that German college professor Ernst Haeckel, just finishing
Darwin’s Origin of the Species, left his physician practice
for the study of embryology. So convinced by what he read, Haeckel became
one of the most zealous advocates of Darwinism in the nineteenth century.
Nine years later, with no real evidence for evolution, Haeckel devised
sketched charts of human developmental stages. By 1875, Haeckel was
convicted of fraud in a trial held by his own university. There he admitted
to faking his drawings in an attempt to show similarities between the
human embryo and that of animals. But today, many biology textbooks
still include these charts, purposefully deceiving thousands of students,
with no mention of their fraudulent history.
conviction, his drawings paved the way for the murdering of the unborn. If
a human life is nothing more than an animal, it’s no wonder the
textbooks refer to the unborn as a mere “blob of tissue.”
Haeckel’s sacred cow of evolution is the well-hidden and underlying
missing link to abortion.
America often mourns the horror of
September 11, 2001 when nearly three thousand lives were tragically
taken, yet keeps silent as more than four thousand lives are stolen
each day through this evolution-influenced terrorism called abortion.
We protest the casualties of war—yet turn our heads away from the 50
million innocent victims of Roe v. Wade. As Christians continue to stand
on the sidelines, the Bible is unwavering; God ordained each of us in
the womb (Jeremiah 1:5). Christians, it’s time to take a stand
–it’s time for a change.
For more ways evolution deceives
society and its impact on our world, view
Lies in the Textbooks and
The Dangers of Evolution from our
Creation Seminar Series. See them online now
Union vs. Intelligent Design Education
From Kevan Myers:
This is a similar link about the same topic:
Dr. Hovind’s seminar addresses various flaws of evolutionary
thinking that are used in this attempt to counteract intelligent design.
For instance, a major problem lies in the fact that they do not recognize
that Evolutionism is also a belief system. Let us consider the tenets
of this humanistic religion:
Evolution - Around twenty billion years ago,
there was nothing. Then all matter came into being. Where did it
come from? They say it doesn’t matter. Then all that matter
was squashed into an area possibly the size of a period on a page.
This is claimed to be part of Science?
6 parts of evolution
Only the last of the 6 is part of science, and it sides with the repeated
Scripture passage, “after his kind.” All the rest are religious.
They must be believed. It takes more faith to believe in evolution,
than in creation.
- Cosmos evolution
- Big Bang The dot got hot and was spinning and then - BANG! Gas
(hydrogen and a little helium) spread throughout the universe.
- Chemical evolution
- From those first two chemical came all the rest of the elements?
- Stellar evolution
- Then, the gases defy Boyle’s gas law (He was the Father
of Modern Chemistry, by the way, a creationist) by compressing themselves
into galaxies, planets and stars. Gas doesn’t like to squish.
What is making it squish?
- Organic evolution
- Life from non-life. This was proven impossible by Louis Pasteur
(greatest microbiologist and also a creationist). If it is impossible
today, what makes us think it was possible back then?
- Change from one kind to another. Never observed by man.
- Change within kind. This is not true evolution, but merely variation
within it kind. See the poodle, great dane, collie, bulldog, some
variety, but all dogs. They don’t turn into frogs.
I believe that the evidence for creation is
so strong, that (according to Romans 1:20) those who reject the Creator
and Savior of mankind “are without excuse.” Both Creation
and Evolutionism are based on Faith. When you look at real science,
it actually agrees much better with the Scriptures than Evolutionism.
But the followers of Evolution lie and claim their viewpoint is actually
science. How ludicrous to say that matter made itself. God tells us
He made the universe.
Most of the branches of scientists that
we study today were founded by men who believed in Creation. Additionally,
there are many scientists today that also believe in a young earth creation
and the Bible. You can look for information on this at
It has been said that no real scientist would reject creation
if it was a reasonable theory. So let’s look at Sir Julian Huxley.
He was a grandson of Thomas Huxley,) who is called “Darwin’s
bulldog.” Thomas was Darwin’s biggest promoter.
Sir Julian was a biologist, and a world leader in promoting evolution
ideals. Don’t you think with that background, he’d have
an idea of what he was talking about? The year he died (1975), he was
asked in a TV interview, “Why have so many scientists been so
quick to adopt Darwin’s theory of evolution?”
Rather than respond with a scientific evidence or logical argument,
Sir Julian replied, “The reason we scientists all jumped at The
Origin of Species was because the idea of God interfered with our sexual
mores.” The source for this quote is called The Collapse of Evolution,
by Scott M. Huse pg.157
Julian’s brother Alduous has a
very similar quote in pg.270 of his book Ends and Means, “I had
a motive for not wanting the world to have a meaning...For myself, the
philosophy of meaninglessness was essentially an instrument of liberation,
sexual and political.” You can look up the whole quote.
It is a good question. If there is no Creator, where do we find
the standard of what is right and what is wrong?
How big the
world is can be shown through measurement and science. But evolution
is not proven. The fact that the universe has all its stars, comets
and galaxies punctures a hole in the “big bang.” If the
theory calls for the matter (which they say was Hydrogen and Helium)
to disperse evenly, there should be no clumps of anything according
to Boyle’s gas laws. No planets, comets, galaxies, stars, earth,
etc. This is a big problem for the “big bang.” Evolution
struggles against the laws of science. If only they would realize: “There
are laws; there must be a Lawgiver!”
God says “...he
made the stars also” (Genesis 1:16).
a closer look at organic evolution: Evolutionists have a problem when
it comes to life...
They believe that non-living matter can
become living. This was a common belief in the days of Darwin. It was
considered that flies spontaneously come from rotten meat, and that
rats will arise from piles of dirty rags. But Louis Pasteur, a great
scientist in biology and microbiology disproved that belief. Life comes
Today in public schools, he is lauded and applauded.
Spontaneous generation was proven false, the students are told. Then
they are taught that spontaneous generation DID happen millions of years
ago. Why should we think that something impossible now was possible
then? How does that follow scientific reasoning? And they don’t
let the students know that Louis Pasteur believed in creation as stated
in Scripture and believed on Jesus as Saviour from sin. Pasteur vehemently
opposed Darwin’s theory, as did many other great men of science,
including his friend Henri Fabre, the “Father of Entomology (study
To be educated, you should look at both sides
of the issue and make a wise choice of what to believe. Most people
in the world are only exposed to the Evolution viewpoint, and thus are
not truly educated. They are indoctrinated, which is different. I believe
that when you look at science, it actually points to the accuracy of
God’s Word. Louis Pasteur, this man through whose research (in
diseases and immunization) hundreds of thousands of lives have been
saved, said of science, “A little science estranges men from God,
but much science brings them back to God.”
Now, we must
understand that the EU stance on Creation is not new. There has been
a long war against the truth of Creation. People do not want to answer
to a Creator, so they deceive themselves and others into thinking there
is no Creator (Romans 1:20-22). They get fooled into thinking that:
What can be done about it? Here is a list of what to do in response
to the EU stance on creationism. The best way to get armed in this form
of battle is to make sure YOU are ready:
- - Evolution is part of science.
- - The Bible is not to be considered for public policy.
- - Evolution is needed to be able to fight disease, etc. (how
- - That real scientists do not believe in creation as stated
in the Bible.
- - Christian fundamentalists are dangerous to society.
- - The Bible does not have the answers.
The EU is not the enemy (though they may be working for him). Have as
your goal to introduce people to the truth so they will turn to the
Creator and be saved from Hell. If one is saved, it is a great victory!
- Make sure you know the Creator, Jesus Christ (John 1:1-3;12)
as your Savior from sin (John 6:47).
- Stay close to Him, spending daily time in prayer and Bible study.
Wisdom comes to those who ask God for it (James 1:5) and search
His Word (Psalm 119:98). Follow the instruction of Psalm 1. Walk
with godly friends (Proverbs 13:20). Be an example to those around
you (I Timothy 4:12).
- Pray for those in the EU (I Timothy 2:1-8).
- Equip yourself with knowledge about the controversy. Get good
books and videos so you can learn, so that you can share (II Timothy
2:2). You can order many tools from us, if you like. Here are just
- 7 part Creation Seminar DVD set from us - (watch closely,
holding a copy of the EU statement) it covers many points that
the EU try to make.
- The Long War Against God, by Henry Morris - backtracks the
history of this war, so you know the background.
- Are you in Europe, Phillip? If so, then it is your duty to make
known your stand with those who hold office above you. That is true,
no matter what nation you are in. Evil prevails when good men do
nothing. The leaders need to know what their people think. If nobody
calls, or voices their opinion, the official will think everyone
agrees with the said platform. Either that or he/she will believe
the public don’t think it is that important. God is looking
for someone to stand in the gap (Ezekiel 22:30). Will you be that
man? In you are not in Europe then do the same for your own nation.
Keep up with your congressmen, get to know them, pray for them,
share information with them, show proper Christian respect, and
keep them accountable.
- Speak out. Share with all you can about the truth that evolutionism
is actually not science but a religious world view, and let them
know about evidence of creation and the Bible. Give them places
they can learn for themselves (for example on the web:
The dangers of creationism in education
The aim of this resolution is not to question or to fight a belief –
the right to freedom of belief does not permit that. The aim is to
warn against certain tendencies to pass off a belief as science.
It is necessary to separate belief from science. It is not a matter
of antagonism. Science and belief must be able
to coexist. It is not a matter of opposing belief and science,
but it is necessary to prevent belief from opposing science.
2. For some people the Creation, as a matter of religious belief, gives
a meaning to life. Nevertheless, the Parliamentary Assembly is worried
about the possible ill-effects of the spread of creationist ideas within
our education systems and about the consequences for our democracies.
If we are not careful, creationism could become a threat to human rights,
which are a key concern of the Council of Europe.
3. Creationism, born of the denial of the evolution of species through
natural selection, was for a long time an almost exclusively American
phenomenon. Today creationist ideas are tending to find their way into
Europe and their spread is affecting quite a few Council of Europe member
4. The prime target of present-day creationists, most of whom are of
the Christian or Muslim faith, is education. Creationists are bent on
ensuring that their ideas are included in the school science syllabuses.
Creationism cannot, however, lay claim to being a scientific discipline.
5. Creationists question the scientific character of certain areas of
knowledge and argue that the theory of evolution is only one interpretation
among others. They accuse scientists of not providing enough evidence
to establish the theory of evolution as scientifically valid. On the
contrary, creationists defend their own statements as scientific. None
of this stands up to objective analysis.
6. We are witnessing a growth of modes of thought which challenge established
knowledge about nature, evolution, our origins and our place in the
7. There is a real risk of serious confusion being introduced into our
children’s minds between what has to do with convictions, beliefs,
ideals of all sorts and what has to do with science. An “all things
are equal” attitude may seem appealing and tolerant, but is in
8. Creationism has many contradictory aspects.
The “intelligent design” idea, which is the latest, more
refined version of creationism, does not deny a certain degree of evolution.
However, intelligent design, presented in a more subtle way, seeks to
portray its approach as scientific, and therein lies the danger.
9. The Assembly has constantly insisted that science is of fundamental
importance. Science has made possible considerable improvements in living
and working conditions and is a rather significant factor in economic,
technological and social development. The theory of evolution has nothing
to do with divine revelation but is built on facts.
claims to be based on scientific rigour. In reality the methods employed
by creationists are of three types: purely dogmatic assertions; distorted
use of scientific quotations, sometimes illustrated with magnificent
photographs; and backing from more or less well-known scientists, most
of whom are not specialists in these matters. By these means creationists
seek to appeal to non-specialists and spread doubt and confusion in
11. Evolution is not simply a matter of the evolution
of humans and of populations. Denying it could have serious consequences
for the development of our societies. Advances in medical research,
aiming at combating infectious diseases such as Aids, are impossible
if every principle of evolution is denied. One cannot be fully aware
of the risks involved in the significant decline in biodiversity and
climate change if the mechanisms of evolution are not understood.
12. Our modern world is based on a long history, of which the development
of science and technology forms an important part. However, the scientific
approach is still not well understood and this is liable to encourage
the development of all manner of fundamentalism and extremism. The total
rejection of science is definitely one of the most serious threats to
human and civic rights.
13. The war on the theory of evolution
and on its proponents most often originates in forms of religious extremism
closely linked to extreme right-wing political movements. The creationist
movements possess real political power. The fact of the matter, and
this has been exposed on several occasions, is that some advocates of
strict creationism are out to replace democracy by theocracy.
14. All leading representatives of the main monotheistic religions
have adopted a much more moderate attitude. Pope Benedict XVI, for example,
as his predecessor Pope John-Paul II, today praises the role of science
in the evolution of humanity and recognises that the theory of evolution
is “more than a hypothesis”.
15. The teaching of
all phenomena concerning evolution as a fundamental scientific theory
is therefore crucial to the future of our societies and our democracies.
For that reason it must occupy a central position in the curriculums,
and especially in the science syllabuses, as long as, like any other
theory, it is able to stand up to thorough scientific scrutiny. Evolution
is present everywhere, from medical overprescription of antibiotics
that encourages the emergence of resistant bacteria to agricultural
overuse of pesticides that causes insect mutations on which pesticides
no longer have any effect.
16. The Council of Europe has highlighted
the importance of teaching about culture and religion. In the name of
freedom of expression and individual belief, creationist ideas, as any
other theological position, could possibly be presented as an addition
to cultural and religious education, but they cannot claim scientific
17. Science provides irreplaceable training in
intellectual rigour. It seeks not to explain “why things are”
but to understand how they work.
18. Investigation of the creationists’
growing influence shows that the arguments between creationism and evolution
go well beyond intellectual debate. If we are not careful, the values
that are the very essence of the Council of Europe will be under direct
threat from creationist fundamentalists. It is part of the role of the
Council of Europe’s parliamentarians to react before it is too
19. The Parliamentary Assembly therefore urges the member
states, and especially their education authorities to:
19.1. defend and promote scientific knowledge;
20. The Assembly welcomes the fact that 27 academies of science of Council
of Europe member states signed, in June 2006, a declaration on the teaching
of evolution and calls on academies of science that have not yet done
so to sign the declaration.
the teaching of the foundations of science, its history, its epistemology
and its methods alongside the teaching of objective scientific knowledge;
19.3. make science more comprehensible, more attractive and
closer to the realities of the contemporary world;
firmly oppose the teaching of creationism as a scientific discipline
on an equal footing with the theory of evolution and in general
the presentation of creationist ideas in any discipline other than
19.5. promote the teaching of evolution as a fundamental
scientific theory in the school curriculums.
- Intelligent Design and the Fall of Darwinism
1] [Part 2] [Part 3] - Jonathan McLatchie speaks at
Kensington Temple in London on “Intelligent Design and the Fall
- Creation Science
Evangelism - Kent Hovind presents the common-sense, scientific
evidence of a 6,000 year-old earth and creation as well as the flood
and what affects that has on what scientists believe they see. You
can view his 7 DVD series free online at YouTube. I’ve put
them all together in order on my DVD resources page
- The Glorious
Part 2] Truths That Transform (January 22-23, 2008) - Just how
flimsy is the case for evolution? Even Darwin himself said, “Not
one change of species into another is on record.” So why do
his followers continue to support his crumbling theory? Find out,
on Truths That Transform with Dr. D. James Kennedy.
In Genesis - Ken Ham takes the Bible literally. His world view
is based on the assumption that the Bible is the word of God and
is infallible. The mission of his Answers in Genesis ministry is “to
bring reformation by restoring the foundations of our faith which
are contained in the book of Genesis.”
The Evolution Cruncher -
Who’s your daddy? A monkey or God? This book speaks to
Evolution and the problems that arise from it.
Young Earth vs. Old Excuse
Don’t Walk - I was raised going to church, and at the
age of 14, my respected Biology teacher taught the class that the
Theory of Evolution was true. I believed him without any question.
At the age of 26, I got a few facts on Creation, then did further
investigation, and now I am convinced Creation is better science
than the Theory of Evolution.