Europe 2007
NAFTA: The Shocking "Rest of the Story" The Cutting Edge - NAFTA was sold to the American public as a brilliant economic plan. Very few people realize that they have just witnessed Biblical prophecy occurring before their unsuspecting eyes!! In the News!! "Executive approval: Survey of American, Mexican, and Canadian executives show they feel the North American Free Trade Agreement has been successful in improving trade and logistics. CEO's and other senior executives at 250 U.S., Canadian, and Mexican companies see far more positives than negatives to the two-year old North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)". {Industry Week, April 1, 1996, V245, N. 7, page 48}. "It was the best of times; it was the worst of times". With these words, the classic novel, "Tale of Two Cities" began, a novel set in the midst of the French Revolution. Today, the same thing could be said for Christians. While we are living in the worst time in American history in terms of declining moral standards, declining traditional faith, and economic stress, we are also living in the most exciting time in history. Since Israel was reborn as a nation in 1948, thus beginning the End of the Age countdown, all the signs of the End of the Age have been occurring together. In the past, many of these signs were seen individually, such as rampant wars, widespread disease, earthquakes, but they never occurred simultaneously as they have now been occurring. Christians who know their Bibles should be very excited, because all our beliefs concerning the accuracy of the Bible are coming to pass, in the daily news, right before our eyes. This is the purpose of The Cutting Edge, to show you how you can see this advance to the Tribulation period right before your eyes, in your daily news. The Biblical term, "Tribulation" or "Great Tribulation" now has a secular name, The New World Order. Their plans to achieve this new order so parallel Biblical prophecy that, if you were to envision all Biblical prophecy about the End of the Age as a photograph, then the plans for The New World Order could be thought of as the negative, producing the positive picture! Today's news concerns NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement, created two years ago, which economically joined Canada, the United States, and Mexico. Most Americans think of NAFTA simply and only as an Economic Entity, because that is the only context in which the media has ever portrayed it. However, the leaders of The New World Order have long been following a plan to recreate the many nations of the world into 10 Super Nations. And, not surprisingly, this Plan fulfills Biblical prophecy! Let us first begin with the New World Order Plan to create 10 Super Nations. In 1957, Alice Bailey, then the leader of the House of Theosophy, wrote in her collection of writings, "The Externalisation of the Hierarchy", that the world must first be reorganized into Spheres of Influence before it could be organized into a Global government (Page 209). She made it very clear that this reorganization would not follow traditional national boundaries, but would be a completely different organization. Bailey did not specify how many "Spheres of Influence" would be created, but her plan was fleshed out in 1974, by New World Order authors, Mihajlo Mesarovic and Eduard Pestel, in a book entitled, "Mankind At The Turning Point". They wrote that the world would be reorganized into 10 Super Nation States, listed below. 10 SPHERES OF INFLUENCE -- NATIONAL REORGANIZATION
Remember, this New World Order Plan
was published in 1974. Firmly set this date in your mind, as it will
become very important in just a few paragraphs. The first question is
"Why 10 Nation specifically?" The answer lies in a knowledge of the
spiritual beliefs of the Occult. They believe that man is to be
spiritually "perfected" by undergoing the process of "Illumination" by
achieving a long, arduous study of "Hidden Truth". Once a man is totally
perfected, he is pictured as standing "upright" next to, but
uncontrolled, by his world. This perfected man is thought of as the
Number 1, while the world is pictured as a zero (0). Thus, the number 10
forms this picture of perfected man standing apart from his world. The
number 10 is a very important symbolic number to the occultist. ("Magic
Symbols", Frederick Goodman, Brian Todd Publishing House, London, 1989,
p. 46-47). Therefore, when the occultic leaders of the New World Order
devised their plan to reorganize the world into Spheres of Influence,
they acted in accordance with their occultic beliefs in deciding to
create 10 Super Nation states. They were creating a New World Order,
which, by its very structure, screamed to the peoples of the world, "We
have created the 'Perfected" world organization, of 10 Super Nations".
The symbolism is powerful: they are the "Perfected" men, standing apart,
but controlling, the world. Ten had to be the number; Occult Doctrine
demanded it. But, this Plan also fulfills a most important Biblical
prophecy. This prophecy was given to the prophet, Daniel, approximately
2,500 years ago, and is the only prophecy which gives a sequence
of events which God foretold would flow from this creation of
the world into 10 nations. Hang on to your hat, for we are going on an
exciting ride. First, let us review the prophecies. The Bible foretells
in Daniel that there is a sequence of events which will foretell the
appearance of Anti-Christ. Turn with me now to Daniel 7:7-8, remembering
that Daniel is talking here of the End of the Age. Consider the
Scripture: "After this I saw in
the night visions, and behold a fourth beast, dreadful and terrible, and
strong exceedingly ...and it had 10 horns. I considered the horns and,
behold, there came up among them another little horn, before whom there
were three of the first plucked up by the roots..." These 10 horns are
further explained in Daniel 2:41 and Revelation 17:12. These prophecies
are quite clear in predicting that the world in the last days of time,
during the Great Tribulation will be reorganized into 10 Super Nation
States, or 10 Regions. This is a shocking revelation, since the world
has been controlled by individual sovereign nations since the Tower of
Babel 5,000 years ago. Today, there are over 170 sovereign nations in
the world today. A new governmental structure is being silently erected
over these 170+ sovereign nations Before our very eyes, a new government
is being erected; this plan, originally published in 1974 in "Mankind At
The Turning Point", is being implemented. And when it is finally
implemented, it will fulfill this Biblical prophecy of 10 Nations at the
End of the Age. Therefore, you see, NAFTA is not simply an economic
super nation; rather, it is Nation #1 of this 10 Nation New World Order.
Very few people understand this, because they have been conditioned by
our national leadership, aided by our national mass media. No one has
ever explained this before. Now, you can understand why Presidents as
seemingly dissimilar in world view, style and philosophy as Presidents
Bush and Clinton could support the creation of NAFTA. President George
Bush began the push to create NAFTA, but was unable to see it created
before he left for office. President Clinton supported NAFTA, even
though he opposed nearly every other thing for which Bush stood. At this
point, I am going to state a truth which I have carefully enunciated in
my radio programs, and which I will soon state again: The New World
Order Plan was created officially in 1776, and has been consistently
supported by Presidents ever since. In this 20th Century, nearly every
President, both Democratic and Republican, has secretly supported the
Plan for The New World Order. It has not mattered whom we have elected,
because both political parties are united in this drive to accomplish
this Plan. Generally, Republican Presidents have concentrated on changes
in the Foreign Policy field, while Democratic Presidents have
concentrated on the needed changes in Domestic Policy. But, whether we
have a Republican or Democratic President, the New World Order Plan
continues unabated. NAFTA is one example of a Foreign Policy change
initiated by a Republican President and continued by a Democratic
President. more...
IDF: Bomb making chemicals were disguised as EU aid
The Jerusalem Post (December
29, 2007) -
Javier SOLANA, EU High Representative for the CFSP, welcomes the completion of the procedures for the accreditation of EUPOL COPPS Europa Document (December 28, 2008) - Javier Solana, EU High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), today welcomed the completion of the procedures for the accreditation of EUPOL COPPS and made the following statement: "I welcome the completion of the procedure that paves the way for the accreditation of the European Union police mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS) by the Government of Israel. I wish to thank Vice Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Mrs Tzipi Livni for her support. This agreement will facilitate the implementation of the mandate of the mission." The aim of the EUPOL COPPS mission is to work with the Palestinian civilian police to support the Palestinian Authority in taking responsibility for law and order, and improving its civilian police and law enforcement capacity. EUPOL COPPS helps to establish sustainable and effective policing arrangements under Palestinian ownership in accordance with the best international standards. This mission is a central pillar of the EU Action Strategy in support of renewed peace efforts between Israel and the Palestinians launched in Annapolis last November.| Israel | Islam | Dividing the Land | EU/UN / 4th Kingdom | Solana | 1st Seal |
Israel fears clash with U.S. over peace talks' impasse
Haaretz (December 25, 2007) -
The United States will conduct confidential assessments of whether
Israel and the Palestinians are meeting their peacemaking commitments
and share the results privately with the parties, U.S. and Western
officials said. Israel has sought to keep the U.S. process of judging
compliance with the long-stalled "road map" peace plan largely secret.
Palestinians say they favour disclosure of judgments on whether Israel
is halting all settlement activity and whether the Palestinians are
curbing militants as the plan demands. Though the Bush administration
has decided to keep the assessment process confidential, it reserves the
right to go public with its views if necessary, the officials said.
U.S. judgments will be crucial because Israel has said it
will not implement any peace deal until the Palestinians meet their
commitments to combat militants in both the West Bank and the
Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip, where militants continue to fire rockets
across the border into Israel. The monitoring process may be a test of
Washington's readiness to hold a key ally to its commitments. Despite
U.S. and Palestinian pressure on Israel to freeze settlements, the
Housing Ministry said on Sunday 740 new homes would be built in East
Jerusalem next year. Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Palestinian
President Mahmoud Abbas agreed at U.S.-sponsored conference in
Annapolis, Maryland last month to relaunch final-status peace talks with
the goal of reaching a statehood agreement by the end of 2008.
more...
Big Brother on Stage: What Kind of Actor is the EU? A
Time, Times, and Half a Time (December
25, 2007) -
Rafael Dochao Moreno,
principal administrator of the Euro-Med Partnership, when asked the
question why Spain chose to launch the Alliance of Civilizations
initiative at the United Nations rather than the European Union
responded that the “Barcelona process is already an AoC…why
do we need an AoC?” Moreno’s response reminded those of us
who have been following the Barcelona Process what we’ve already
known--that the Alliance of Civilizations is a
key aspect for the European foreign policy.
The Barcelona Process, introduced in 1995 by Spain’s Javier Solana,
contained a social cohesion strategy which had a goal to combat
religious fundamentalism worldwide. The Alliance of Civilizations is
merely a vehicle for such activity. Right from the start, the AoC
was intended to form the
core of the global counter-terrorism strategy.
Before the cartoon crisis (in which Spain’s Zapatero, Moratinos,
Federico Mayor, and Solana so authoritatively rose to the occasion
to turn
crisis into opportunity),
Spain’s foreign minister had
introduced the idea of the AoC as a tool to combat terrorism.
Incidentally, although no group has ever stepped forward to claim
responsibility or offer rationale for inciting the cartoon crisis,
blame was assigned to “religious extremists” along with the claim
that they seek to provoke a clash of civilizations. There is only
one group that has reaped tremendous political benefit from the
cartoon crisis--it almost reminds me of the Reichstag fire. In a
previous blog post we examined the
Club of Madrid’s 2005
counter-terrorism strategy. As I reviewed the conference pictures
and
list of participants, I
noticed linkages to those who put forth the EU Social Cohesion
Policy and the Alliance of Civilisations initiative. It is not
surprising then that the Madrid Agenda contains identical objectives
to those of the
European Union’s Counter-Terrorism Strategy.
Europe’s counter-terrorism strategy was presented to the
June 2003 Thessalonika European Council
by Javier Solana. Solana’s counter-terrorism strategy, which was
incorporated into the security strategy
A Secure Europe for a Better World,
addresses combating strategic terrorism as its primary objective.
Recall in
Part I of my
counter-terrorism article that strategic terrorism has been
attributed to religious beliefs in which one accepts an
“exclusivist” truth claim. An examination of the EU
counter-terrorism documents yields the same definition. But here we
see the lion’s teeth of militarization. There is an interesting
paragraph in the Thessalonika document which reads: “…the Danish Presidency decided to commission a group of Ministers' personal representatives to submit an analysis of the phenomenon of extreme fundamentalism and terrorism…The final report has been submitted and will be further discussed within the Council with a view to taking forward its recommendations.” “In most fundamentalist transnational terrorist violence, the perpetrators tend to view the front line to be between Israel and the United States, on the one hand, and the Islamic world on the other. It involves the dispute about the US occupation of holy areas either itself or through proxies such as the authoritarian regimes of Saudi Arabia and Persia, or Israel. According to the report of the Extreme Fundamentalism and Terrorism Group (EFTG) the settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict would have a very important positive impact on the struggle against extreme fundamentalism and terrorism.”This is consistent with the Alliance of Civilizations’ statements as during the Doha debates Israel’s government was named an extremist regime. Regarding fundamentalism, the EFTG says: "Fundamentalism has been defined as an attitude where non-negotiable principles are introduced to politics from a transcendental source, holy texts or a divine discourse. “From the point of view of fundamentalism, religion expresses a divine order, which ideally embraces all life spheres. Although this may simply lead fundamentalists to encapsulate their own existence around their religious beliefs (“Quietism”), they will most often actively pursue the goal of seeking other life spheres, including political one, dominated by religious rather than secular principles.” Often fundamentalism has also meant a tendency to impose these principles indiscriminately on believers and non-believers alike.”The European Commission’s social cohesion research report further demonstrates that religious fundamentalism will not be tolerated within the European neighborhood. "This third school of thought is referred to as 'civil society as the public sphere'. "Theories of the public sphere demand a return to the practice of politics. Not as an elite occupation in which the public takes part once every four or five years through elections, but as an ongoing process through which 'active citizens' can help to shape both the ends and means of the good society…Essential to the functioning of democracy, according to the line of thinking of this school, is that all sets of voices are heard. Inequality and discrimination are therefore seen as the enemies of the public sphere. Fundamentalism is seen as its most dangerous enemy, since fundamentalism does not acknowledge the existence of different truths nor does it respect other values, which makes it impossible to reach a consensus with other groups... The only similarity between European policy and this third school of thought is its aversion to fundamentalism."As part of the 2007-2013 Cohesion Policy, member states are bound by agreement to implement European Security and Defense Policy (ESDP) guidelines. As mentioned earlier, the European Defense Strategy’s focus is primarily on combating strategic terrorism. To do so, Solana has created a military-industrial complex having the following characteristics (to name only a few):
| EU/UN / 4th Kingdom | Solana | 1st Seal | NewWorldOrder | America |
EU is increasingly perceived worldwide as a global player Bertlesmann-Stiftung (December 25, 2007) -
International opinion survey: US experiences dramatic
loss of stature - Rapidly growing awareness of environmental threats -
EU recognized as world power. The European Union is increasingly
perceived all over the world as a global power, and is anticipated to
play a major role on the international stage in 2020 after the US, China
and Russia. The US's superpower image is fading, while China and Russia
have risen enormously in stature. There was a spike in many parts of the
world in people's awareness of the dangers of climate change and
environmental devastation. Climate protection and poverty are currently
seen as the most important tasks facing international policy makers.
These are some of the findings of a worldwide opinion poll conducted by
the German foundation, the Bertelsmann Stiftung. According to the
poll, the European Union already enjoys the reputation of a global
player, and was ranked fifth on average by all international
respondents. This picture improves for the Europeans as time goes on.
When asked which nations and organizations would be global powers in
2020, every third person mentioned the EU. On the other hand, the US
lost its undisputed leadership position. While 81 percent of people
would still call the US a world power today, only 61 percent expect it
to retain this position into 2020. Once again, China, India and - more
recently - Russia have greatly boosted their own profiles as global
players. With a 57 percent response rate, China was mentioned almost as
frequently as the US as a future superpower. They were followed further
down by Russia with 37 percent, the EU with 33 percent, Japan with 33
percent and India with 29 percent. Compared to the United Nations,
the EU is perceived as a very strong player in global politics. This
applies in all countries surveyed except India, where the UN has a
higher standing. And in China, the perception of the EU as a world power
rose significantly - by 15 percentage points in the past two years. When
asked if their own country should cooperate more closely with the EU,
the vast majority of the international respondents - 74 percent on
average - said yes. This desire is particularly strong in China and
Russia, where stronger ties with the EU are favoured by 98 percent and
91 percent of respondents, respectively. In the US, these numbers were
78 percent, in Brazil 70 percent, in India 68 percent and in Japan 48
percent. Recent years have seen a shift in perceptions of what
challenges face the world and what goals global players should work
towards. For example, in almost all the countries surveyed, awareness
of environmental threats skyrocketed, while dangers such as global
terrorism were viewed as less urgent. Awareness of environmental
problems has risen more than 10 percentage points worldwide since 2005.
The percentage of people who viewed climate change and environmental
devastation as global threats rose in all countries surveyed, but
especially in the US (+22 percentage points), China (+17 percentage
points) and Japan (+16 percentage points). On average, 54 percent of all
people viewed environmental destruction as the most important threat.
Only in Russia (31 percent) and India (28 percent) did a minority of the
population view this problem as a major threat. At the same time, the
perceived significance of global terrorism showed no change compared to
two years ago. The other key challenges cited by respondents were
poverty and overpopulation, war, resource scarcity, and religious
conflicts and fundamentalism. more...
NATO
Secretary General, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer NATO
highlights by 51 Reasons (December 20,
2007) - On the eve of the festive season I would like to share
with you my thoughts on the months ahead. But first I want to address
the people we owe most in this organisation – the men and women in
uniform. Over 60000 of you currently serve with distinction in NATO-led
operations in different parts of the world. Your dedication, courage,
professionalism and hard work are a credit to you and to NATO. The risks
you take in fulfilling dangerous missions – in Afghanistan, in Kosovo,
in the Mediterranean, as well as providing training in Iraq and helping
logistically the African Union with its mission in Darfur – say so much
about your commitment to security and stability goals. This commitment
is greatly appreciated and embodies the highest standard of excellence
associated with the Alliance. At this time of the year our thoughts are
in particular with the families of those who have paid the highest price
in these operations: your sacrifices will not be forgotten and have not
been made in vain. Next year promises to be just as active as the
passing one. The whole NATO community – civilians and military alike –
will be burning midnight oil to prepare for the key event at the
beginning of April: the Bucharest Summit of NATO. Important decisions
await the leaders of 26 Allied countries. They will deliberate on the
further enlargement of NATO, on strategic guidance shaping the nature of
our continued engagement in Afghanistan and Kosovo, as well as on all
the crucial projects essential for tackling major security challenges
confronting us. This list includes such diverse topics as fight against
terrorism, missile defence, new capabilities, energy security or cyber
defence. I am also convinced that coming months will broaden and
intensify NATO’s dialogue and cooperation with our partners. We will
strive to improve further a team-work approach with the United Nations
and with the European Union. And we will also work more in the framework
of the Partnership for Peace, Mediterranean Dialogue and Istanbul
Cooperative Initiative. We will spare no efforts to resolve existing
differences with the Russian Federation, to support reform efforts in
Ukraine. This is a long list of goals. But NATO is a busy Alliance.
Projecting stability where it is needed. Building global partnerships,
where they make sense. And standing as a unique forum for
transatlantic consultation on security issues. All, as
ever, to preserve the security of the citizens of NATO countries and the
broader international community. NATO will continue to make its
contribution to international security in 2008. I wish you and your
loved ones a safe and happy year. And once again, I send my best wishes,
and warm thanks, to the NATO and Partner soldiers far away from home
during this festive season. If you haven't read through it yet, please check out the Treaty of Lisbon and how the Alliance of Civilizations, combating those who claim sole ownership to the Truth, is being set up to be enforced through Europe and NATO to combat terrorism with military and civilian forces. The question is when will the war on the saints, who hold to the Truth of the Bible that lays claim to sole ownership of the Truth, will begin. According to Bible prophecy that time is coming and according to the HIStory, Our Future Bible studies, that time is just around the corner. 2008 will be a determining year and if this is accurate, a very chaotic year full of prophecy fulfilled.
NATO Backs Turkey's Alliance of Civilizations Initiative Todays
Zaman (December 20, 2007) -
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has announced that it
supports the Alliance of Civilizations initiative, co-chaired by Turkey
and Spain. The NATO summit started on Tuesday with the
participation of 26 heads of state and government in Riga, Latvia. In a
joint declaration, NATO leaders expressed their support for the Alliance
of Civilizations initiative. "We support
the collective value and dialogue between cultures and people. Therefore
the Alliance of Civilizations initiative under the aegis of United
Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan is of great importance to us,"
was the announcement made at the end of the summit. Meanwhile, NATO
leaders also invited Serbia, Montenegro and Bosnia-Herzegovina on
Wednesday to begin negotiations for eventual membership in the
military alliance, but urged Serbia and Bosnia to fully
cooperate with the UN war crimes tribunal. NATO leaders resumed their
summit Wednesday with a pledge to stay the course in Afghanistan despite
mounting casualties and the continual refusal of some governments to
send their troops into combat in the most dangerous regions of the
country. "We will stand with the
Afghan people for the long term," NATO Secretary-General Jaap de Hoop
Scheffer told reporters at the press conference held after the
gathering. Well it appears that NATO likes the goal of the Alliance of Civilizations. This means that all member nations of NATO will go along with European military forces to enforce wherever this ends up going. I don't think it looks good for those who refuse to go along with the global governance plans.
Brussels names first 'EU ambassador' Telegraph.co.uk (December
17, 2007) - Brussels has appointed the European Union's first
"ambassador" more than a year before the EU Reform Treaty comes into
force, The Sunday Telegraph has learned. The powerful dual role will
involve Belgium's Koen Vervaeke representing both the European
Commission and the EU's 27 member states in Africa. The position is part
of a diplomatic corps created under the treaty signed by Gordon Brown in
Lisbon last week amid claims by Eurosceptics of a betrayal of Britain's
national interests. Brussels chiefs have pressed ahead with Mr
Vervaeke's appointment before any countries have begun ratifying the
treaty, which is scheduled to come into effect in 2009. Critics
have accused the commission of riding roughshod over the ratification
process, which in Britain will see the treaty subject to parliamentary
scrutiny and votes over more than 20 days next year. Dr Charles Tannock,
a Conservative Euro-MP and the party's foreign affairs spokesman at the
European Parliament, said: "By appointing this man to Africa they are
obviously testing the waters. This is the way things will work in the
future. But until the treaty is ratified they have no mandate to set up
anything like an EU diplomatic corps." The official Brussels line is
that Mr Vervaeke's role is "an exception". Under the treaty, there
will be a powerful EU foreign minister, or "high representative",
who will also service member states and the commission, deriving his
power from what Brussels officials call a "double hat" arrangement. Javier
Solana, the Spaniard who heads the EU's fledgling foreign office, is
tipped for the job, which will involve taking on more than
100 existing commission delegations around the world and turning them
into a corps of diplomats. Mr Vervaeke, 47, who will be based in Addis
Ababa, Ethiopia, is essentially a regional foreign minister with a
mandate to talk on behalf of the entire EU.
The EU's Treaty Treachery Human
Events (December 17, 2007) - To
millions of Britons, December 13, 2007 is a date which will live in
infamy. In the Labor Party’s 2006 Election Manifesto, the British people
were given a devout promise that there would be a referendum on whether
to sign on to the proposed EU Constitution. Gordon Brown reaffirmed this
vow when he succeeded Tony Blair as Prime Minister in July of this year.
The promise was an empty one. The proposed EU Constitution --
meant to replace all previous treaties -- was already legally dead
thanks to ”no” votes by both the
French
and the Dutch in 2005. But behind the scenes, there has
been treachery afoot these past 30 months. Bureaucrats never
take your “no” for the answer to what they want. Slowly, the Euro forces
began cosmetic surgery. The Constitution underwent a political makeover
and re-emerged as the new EU Reform Treaty, a document which is not only
the same as the failed EU Constitution, but has added even more
bureaucracy to it. On Thursday morning, December 13 in Lisbon,
Portugal, the Presidents and Prime Ministers from the 27 member nations
were to gather to sign this new Treaty. All were present except for
Gordon Brown. He sent his Foreign Minister. David Milliband signed this
historical document on behalf of the UK when the cameras were flashing.
Brown explained his absence as a “conflict of scheduling.” Then
events took a turn toward treachery worthy of a Shakespearian play.
Three hours later, Brown surreptitiously arrived. Cowering in a back
room off the main hall - where he had hoped in vain to avoid the cameras
-- the pusillanimous Prime Minister signed the document. One
EU insider dryly remarked that Brown acted like someone who was trying
to keep a dirty little secret. Brown seems to have imagined that
this out-of-sight out-of-mind tactic would fool the British public.
Hardly. The Shadow (Conservative) Foreign Minister, William Hague, asked
what the members of the EU would think of a man who “dithers for a week
about whether or not he wants to be photographed putting pen to paper.”
To others it was more a case of Brown proving to be as handy with a
knife as Brutus. So just what are the most important points of
the so-called “Reform Treaty” as they impact minor details like, for
instance, British sovereignty? The EU is designed to be a
superstructure entity that creates a single foreign policy and one-stop
overarching decision-making powers which will be directed downwards to
all its member states. Until now, the heads of the 27 member nations
served six month rotations as nominal EU President. That egalitarian
practice is now dead. There is to be a
new all-powerful unelected President of Europe, appointed by the 27
heads of state - not elected by the 350 million people of new Europe.
(Frustrated Democrats who have never gotten over the US 2000 election,
please note). Tony Blair, former Prime Minister of the UK, has been
heavily tipped to take over this coveted post. Although the initial idea
of a single EU Foreign Minister was abandoned in this round of “ever
closer union”, the new Treaty calls for a Foreign Policy Chief
-- who will hold diplomatic status and head up the new EU Foreign
Service bureaucracy. What’s in a name? Perhaps
everything. Great Britain and Poland asked to opt out of signing on to
the 50-article Charter of Fundamental Rights -- for the time being. This
charter promises life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and religions
freedom. It then goes on to promise universal collective bargaining,
fair working conditions and shelter. Yes, shelter. No one in the New
Europe will be allowed to be homeless. The UK continues to demure on
joining the Euro. But this Treaty puts yet more pressure on Great
Britain to ditch the Pound in favor of New Europe’s collective currency.
The most sinister part of the Treaty is contained in another rule. This
one gives the EU rights to overturn decisions made by Britain’s
Immigration and Asylum Tribunal. Those who have sought -- and have been
rejected -- as asylum seekers in the UK now have the right to take their
cases over the head of Great Britain’s highest court and appeal to the
unelected European Court of Justice in Luxembourg whose EU bureaucrats
will have the final say. Giving the EU authorities power to trump
immigration and border issues inside the UK is seen as the end of their
democracy by many a Brit. When the EU Court of Justice can overrule any
member nation’s own judiciary, another piece of national sovereignty has
been signed away. The output of venom directed against the Prime
Minister since Wednesday’s dirty deed has been stunning. The most
vociferous critics of Brown’s stealth execution of the treaty are
calling for his severed head to be skewered on a pike and set above the
Thames. This was often the fate of traitors in earlier times. The
British have such colorful traditions. Others have suggested that the
Tower of London be re-commissioned to serve as a prison for Brown and
his minions. Calls have been raised for a million people to surround the
Houses of Parliament in a massive protest where this Treaty must be
ratified in the House of Commons. Two full weeks of debate have been
promised the public -- but then promises come cheap in politics. Brown
himself has been compared to Neville Chamberlain, who returned to
England from Germany in 1938 waving a paper which Adolph Hitler had
written promising that there would be no future war. British veterans
and their heirs must surely wonder why two world wars were fought and
millions of lives lost if the British sovereignty would eventually be
surrendered -- by their own government -- to their former continental
enemies. Brown is also now being parodied in cartoons and editorials
which compare him to that bumbling silent English loner, Mr. Bean. After
all, the wags point out, Brown doesn’t like to even mingle with his EU
counterparts. Brown bungles about like Mr. Bean, although Mr. Bean’s
awkwardness and its consequences are inadvertent. And like the bumbling
Mr. Bean, since Brown went slinking off to Portugal to sign away his
country’s autonomy, Brown has mumbled to the English press that the new
EU treaty "would provide a lasting framwork for the EU" yet at the same
time create "a circle of reflection" on the EU's long term future. Of
course, there is a technical flaw in that observation. Gordon Brown
isn’t English. He’s a sly and canny Scot. Come to that, so is Tony
Blair. Many a wary English eye is now being cast north of Hadrian’s
Wall. Just a few months ago, the ever more powerful Scottish Parliament
voted to give every one of its citizens free health care, the costs for
which will be taken out of English pockets. Is the new Europe Reform
Treaty part of the Great Scottish Plot? Is this Braveheart’s Revenge? nonymouse from FulfilledProphecy shared this USA Today story pointing out that the President of Europe "will have few formal powers but will chair leaders' summits and meetings and help the EU's foreign policy chief represent the bloc on the world stage." The initial story points out what I think may be the 3 horns from Daniel 7:7,8 that are plucked with the little horn (man of sin) arising from the 10 since the French, Dutch and British rejection of the Constitution has been circumvented in the Treaty of Lisbon.
What is Happening to Europe? Frontline
Fellowship (December 17, 2007) -
Europe is in danger of falling to Islam. The catastrophic
decline of Christianity in Europe and the sharp decline in the birth
rate, along with massive Islamic immigration, has made Europe vulnerable
to an Islamic takeover. Secular Humanism and Hedonism have
gutted Europe, morally, spiritually and ethically. Most Europeans have
replaced the pleasure of worship with the worship of pleasure.
Materialism and Occultism have, in too many areas, filled the spiritual
vacuum. Abortion, pornography and perversion have devastated the morals
of Europe. History is repeating itself . Europe today
is facing a similar Renaissance of paganism and aggressive Islamic
expansionism, which threatened faith and freedom back in the 15 th and
16 th Centuries. There is an urgent need for a new Reformation. Secular
Humanism and Hedonism are no match for Islamic Jihad. Only a vibrant
Biblical Christianity can enable Europe to resist, and defeat, radical
Islam. From the time of the Reformation in the 1500’s, through to the
beginning of the Second World War, Europe was the world’s dominant
trading and industrial region. However, Marxist economies and
dictatorships in Eastern Europe crippled development, eroded national
infrastructures, undermined the ecology and devastated the work ethic,
retarding economic development. In Western Europe, the ruinous World
Wars and costly welfare state with its restrictive practices in trade
and industry slowed down innovative development. By the second half of
the 20th Century, the North American and East Asian economies surged
ahead of those of Europe. After the Muslim invasions of the 7th and 8th
Centuries, Christianity was almost wiped out in its heartlands of North
Africa and the Middle East. For nearly 1,000 years the countries of
Western Europe became the last major refuge for Christianity. The
aggressively expanding and encircling Muslim forces occupied Spain,
overwhelmed the Byzantine Empire, and threatened the very heartland of
Europe, even seizing Budapest in 1527 and besieging Vienna as late as
the 17th Century. Hemmed in by Islam, Europe was effectively prevented
from having any meaningful missionary outreach to Africa or Asia. It was
not until the Reformation in the 16th Century that the church was
revitalized to eventually become a force for world evangelization. The
last 400 years have seen tremendous worldwide advance for the Gospel,
but recently it has witnessed a distressing decline in Europe itself.
The energies that were released by the Protestant Reformation and its
rediscovery of the Bible in the common tongue, led to the most
extraordinary spiritual Revival in history. The Reformation freed the
Christians of Northern Europe from the decadence of Renaissance paganism
and lead to the greatest birth of freedom and scientific discoveries in
history. The Reformation in Europe championed the principles of
religious freedom, liberty of conscience, the rule of law, separation of
powers and constitutionally limited republics. The Reformation forwarded
the explosion of scientific enquiry, the industrial revolution, and the
campaign to eradicate the slave trade worldwide. However, from the time
of the French Revolution in 1789, hostile, anti-Christian ideologies
began to compete with Christianity for worldwide dominance. Secular
Humanism, Evolutionism, Socialism and Marxism have led to terrible wars,
oppression and destruction. With the rise of Secular Humanism a
practical atheism or fuzzy new age spirituality have become the
predominant beliefs of most Europeans. Many Europeans have moved away
from the rock certainties of their Biblical Christian heritage to the
sands of situation ethics, relativism, reincarnation, the new age and
the occult. The popularity of the occultic Harry Potter books
and films are a symptom of this new fascination with witchcraft. Secular
societies in Europe now regard Christian absolutes with intolerance and
Bible believing Christians are frequently ridiculed, marginalised and
even legislated against, with secular governments no longer satisfied
with the deviant being declared normal, but demanding that the normal be
declared deviant. The popularity of fraudulent and fictional
anti-Christian books, such as The Da Vinci Code and The
Gospel of Judas, are symptomatic of the rise of anti-Christian
heathenism in Europe. Much of the blame for the defeat and retreat of
Christianity in Europe must be laid at the door of liberal theology
which rose to dominate theological institutions all over Western Europe
by the beginning of the 20th Century. Most mainline denominations were
spiritually crippled by the deliberate erosion of confidence in the
Scriptures and in the power of the Gospel. The primary results of these
liberal termites has been a massive exodus away from attending liberal
denominations. Large areas of Europe today are post-Christian with a
small, irrelevant, committed Christian remnant with little impact on the
broader society. Most of Europe needs to be evangelized again. Many
areas of Europe have not had meaningful exposure to Biblical
Christianity for several generations. William Booth, the founder of the
Salvation Army, over a century ago, warned that a time may come when
Europe would have: “A religion without the Holy Spirit, Christianity
without Christ, Forgiveness without Repentance, Salvation without
Regeneration, politics without God, a Heaven without a hell and a
Saviour without a cross.” That describes many churches today and
underlines the urgent need for a new Reformation. As Alexander
Solzenitzen declared of Russia in 1917: “We forgot God!”
Those who forget the lessons of the past are doomed to
repeat its failures. We need to rediscover our history if we are to
survive the present threats. more...
Major Outcomes
of the Alliance of Civilizations Forum Alliance
of Civilizations (December 15-16, 2007) -
Announcement of a
Global
Youth Employment Initiative, called Silatech, with an investment of
$100 million from H.H. Sheika Mozah bint Nasser-el-Missned and partnerships
with the World Bank and the corporate sector, notably with CISCO, which will
begin with 5 pilot country programs in the Middle East. Announcement of a
multi-million dollar AoC Media Fund that will be a first-of-its-kind nonprofit
large-scale media production company focused on normalizing images of
stereotyped communities and minorities in mass media through partnerships with
major Hollywood production, distribution, and talent management companies.
The Fund was launched with an initial commitment of 10$ million, and an
estimated target of $100 million. Announcement of national and regional
strategies for cross cultural dialogue by governments and multilateral
organizations to advance AoC objectives in their respective countries and
regions. Establishment of partnership agreements, with various multilateral
agencies and organizations, which contain specific terms that will enable the
AoC to leverage networks, contacts, and competitive advantages of partners in
the implementation of its programs. We have signed 5 agreements - with
UNESCO, ARABIC STATES LEAGUE, ISESCO, ALECSO and United Cities and Local
Governments (UCLG) - and a letter of intent with the Council of Europe.
Launch of the AoC Clearinghouse beginning with a theme of Media Literacy
Education, which will catalogue media literacy programs and related government
policies in different parts of the world; and announcements of partnerships
with several universities that will serve as nodes to enliven this clearinghouse
by initiating exchanges and posting materials on the latest development in media
literacy education. Launch of a Rapid Response Media Mechanism
beginning with an online resource that will feature a list of global experts in
cross-cultural issues, who are available to comment or to talk to journalists,
particularly in times of major cross-cultural crises. Establishment of a Youth Solidarity Fund aimed at providing grants to support youth-led programs in
the areas of intercultural and interfaith dialogue. Moreover, a
decision was made to strengthen the network of youth participants that attended
the AoC Forum and broaden the network to include other youth. Creation of a
global network of philanthropic foundations and private funders, which will
share information; raise awareness of ongoing initiatives, identify mutual
needs; and explore ways to leverage existing resources for greatest impact.
Discussions at the policymaking level that highlight the importance to move the
Alliance forward in 2008 such as: developing joint multi-stakeholders
initiatives at the regional level aimed at promoting a better inter-cultural
understanding, and preventing the mounting of tensions and the rise of
extremism; contributing to the upgrade of the inter-cultural dialogue among the
two banks of the Mediterranean Sea; launching a number of activities within the
framework of active and city diplomacy. Establishment of an Alliance network
of good will ambassadors made up of prominent, high-profile,
internationally recognized figures drawn form the worlds of politics, culture,
sport, business and entertainment to help in promoting the work of the
Alliance, highlighting priority issues and drawing attention to its
activities. Commitment by the United Nations Global Compact to producing a
publication aimed at raising the visibility of best practices in the corporate
sector toward supporting cross-cultural relations. Signing of an
action-oriented statement of solidarity and joint commitment by diverse
religious leaders toward the goal of advancing shared security and peace
and providing youth with guidance to counter extremist influences.
EU
leaders sign landmark treaty BBC
News (December 13, 2007) - EU
leaders have signed a treaty in the Portuguese capital, Lisbon, that
is expected to greatly alter the way the 27-nation body operates.
The treaty creates an EU president and a more powerful foreign
policy chief. The document, signed at a ceremony at the city's
historic Jeronimos Monastery, also scraps veto powers in
many policy areas. It is a replacement for the EU
constitution, which was abandoned following French and Dutch
opposition. EU leaders insist that the two texts are in no way
equivalent. But the Lisbon treaty incorporates some of the draft
constitution's key reforms, and several governments face domestic
pressure over the document. In a speech before the signing, European
Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso called on European leaders
to use the treaty to make freedom, prosperity and solidarity an
everyday reality for all European citizens. "From this old
continent, a new Europe is born," he said. Portuguese Prime Minister
Jose Socrates, whose country holds the rotating EU presidency, said
the treaty would create a more modern, efficient and democratic
union. "The world needs a stronger Europe," he said. The leaders
signed the treaty, translated into the EU's 23 official languages,
using specially engraved silver fountain pens as a choir sang
Beethoven's Ode to Joy. UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown signed
the treaty later in the day after missing the ceremony, citing a
prior engagement in the British parliament. Foreign Secretary David
Miliband attended the signing ceremony. The UK's opposition
Conservatives accused Mr Brown of "not having the guts" to sign the
treaty, which is politically controversial in Britain, in public.
Having started this year with a celebration of its 50th birthday,
the EU hopes the signing of the Lisbon treaty will end the serious
mid-life crisis brought about by the death of the constitution, the
BBC's Oana Lungescu reports. There will be a lot of relief, said a
senior European diplomat, but also some apprehension about what
happens next. Ireland is the only country planning to hold a
referendum, but most voters there seem either undecided or
indifferent. Parliaments in Britain, the Netherlands and Denmark are
also expected to give a turbulent reception to the 250-page text.
However, Germany, France and Poland have pledged to be among the
first to ratify it, so that the new reforms can come into force in
2009 as planned. The treaty is a
slimmed-down version of the European constitution, with a more
modest name and without any reference to EU symbols such as the flag
and anthem. It is meant to ease decision-making, by scrapping
national vetoes in some 50 policy areas, including sensitive
ones such as police and judicial co-operation. There
will also be a foreign policy chief, controlling a big budget and
thousands of diplomats and officials, and a permanent EU president
appointed for up to five years. But some already fear that instead
of giving Europe a strong single voice in the world, the new posts
will only generate more rivalry, our correspondent adds. According to Bible prophecy, this consolidation of power will continue despite opposition to it and eventually all will wonder at the beast and worship him when he declares himself god. Except those for whom the coming war on the saints will be waged. Revelation 13:4-8
Russia, France, Germany, Algeria and US Training Fatah Commandos Israel
National News (December 13, 2007)
- PA Arabs belonging to the Fatah terrorist group loyal to PA
President Mahmoud Abbas are being trained in Russia, France, Germany
and Algeria for “counter-terror” operations against Hamas. According
to the New York Daily News, the PA forces are receiving covert
training at a secret Russian base in Moscow in an effort to stave
off a Hamas takeover of Judea and Samaria. The Fatah men are being
trained by Russian commandos who fought Islamist terrorists in
Chechnya. The PA force is named “al-Himaya Wal-Isnad" (defense and
reinforcement) according to the report and includes 25 PA
intelligence officers. The course will last for a month and will
involve extensive weapons and combat training. According to the Daily News report, similar training courses are
being provided in France, Germany and Algeria – with plans to send
PA units to other countries for training as well. "They are getting
good training over there," PA official Dr. Ibrahim Khraishi told the
Daily News. Meanwhile, in Judea and Samaria, PA forces
continue to receive equipment and training from the US, with
General Keith Dayton continuing to oversee the program even after
the American-supplied arms and equipment supplied to Fatah in Gaza
was inherited by Hamas with little resistance shown by Fatah forces.
Dayton even testified to Congress just a few weeks before the fall
of Fatah in Gaza, saying that the PA forces his men trained had
progressed significantly. Abu Yousuf, a Fatah terrorist from
Abba's own Force 17 security forces, told WorldNetDaily earlier this
year that while some of the weapons may be used in confrontations
against Hamas, the bulk of the American arms and training
would be utilized to "hit the Zionists." He also said if
there is a major conflict with Israel, U.S. weapons provided
to Fatah may be shared with other "Palestinian
resistance organizations." What side are we on? The bottom line is that Islam has a common enemy, everyone that isn't Muslim - and especially hatred for Israel. So could this conflict between Hamas and Fatah a deceptive way to get arms for their future plans to destroy the nation of Israel as foretold in the Bible? How far does this conspiracy go? Are our leaders really that ignorant? What is the goal of Islam?
Blair
ducks MK question about Jewish state
Jerusalem Newswire (December
12, 2007) -
Israeli parliamentarians were reportedly furious December
12 when former British Prime Minister Tony Blair refused to answer a
question directed at him about Palestinian Liberation Organization [PLO]
Chairman Mahmoud Abbas' [Abu Mazen’s] recently reiterated refusal to
recognize Israel as a JEWISH state. While the PLO has consistently held
to its refusal to acknowledge and agree to Israel being a Jewish state,
it began to more blatantly and vociferously express this position in the
week before last month's Annapolis conference. And it has repeated its
position since. Blair, who is in Israel in his new role as special envoy
on behalf of the so-called Quartet of world powers, was addressing the
Knesset [Parliament] Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee when one of
its members, Likud MK Limor Livnat, questioned him on the issue.
"Members of the committee were furious when Blair did not answer,"
reported the leftist daily, Haaretz. The international community is
widely understood to agree with the Arab point of view that there should
be no Jewish state per se, but that the Jews who live in the Middle East
should agree to being citizens of a one-man-one-vote state. By contrast,
the Jews who founded Israel believed, as does virtually the entire
nation as it exists today, that a Jewish state is essential if they are
to survive as a people in this almost universally anti-Jewish world.
France
scores symbolic victory against Turkish EU membership EU
Observer (December 12, 2007) -
France has scored a symbolic victory in its battle against Turkey
joining the European Union by succeeding in removing the word
'accession' from an EU document on the state of negotiations. A
statement on the EU's enlargement strategy, agreed by foreign
ministers in Brussels on Monday (11 December), refers only to an
intergovernmental conference with Turkey and Croatia later this
month, rather than to accession or membership negotiations. The
normal phrasing for these meeting to discuss progress on membership
negotiations is "accession conferences." But France, strongly
opposed to Turkey joining the EU, got its way yesterday after
putting diplomatic pressure on for around two weeks before the
meeting. Britain and Sweden were amongst the countries that were
against the French move. "We do not see any rationale for
backtracking either on the Treaty of Rome or on these commitments,"
Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt said before the meeting,
according to Reuters. French president Nicolas Sarkozy has made no
secret of his staunch opposition to Ankara's membership bid. It
featured during his presidential campaign in the first half of 2007
while after his election Mr Sarkozy suggested Turkey become a member
of a Mediterranean Union he wants to set up and that the EU's final
borders are discussed in a wise committee - both suggestions are
seen as part of an overall aim to derail Turkey's bid. Germany is
also against Turkish EU membership, but has been less vocal at the
European level on the issue than France. It prefers instead a
privileged partnership - essentially granting Ankara closer ties
with the EU but no decision-making powers. Turkey opened membership
talks with the EU in 2005. But it has only made small progress so
far. Talks have been blocked in a number of areas because of
Ankara's position on Cyprus - it refuses to trade with it - while
France has blocked the opening of talks in areas that smack too much
of leading to EU membership. Turkey itself has also been slow to
undertake internal democratic reforms, which has led to criticism
from the EU side. more... With rejection by Europe, who will Turkey turn to? Most likely, and according to Bible prophecy, Turkey will align with the Islamic side and participate in the attack on Israel. Keep watching!
EU to agree Kosovo talks over Reuters (December
9, 2007) - EU leaders are expected to agree this week that
efforts to reach a negotiated solution to the Kosovo problem are
exhausted, and offer to take responsibility for security and justice
in the breakaway Serbian province. But Russian Foreign Minister
Sergei Lavrov said on Sunday "artificial deadlines" for finding a
solution to Kosovo's status were not binding and could raise risks
to stability. EU negotiator Wolfgang Ischinger will brief
European Union foreign ministers on Monday on the results of four
months of mediation efforts and urge them to help stabilize the
Balkan territory by sending in police and justice officials
soon. Leaders of the 27-nation bloc are expected to declare
in a statement at a summit on Friday that negotiations are at an end
and that the future of both Serbia and Kosovo lies in the
European Union, diplomats said. They are also likely to
confirm they are willing to dispatch police and justice missions and
appoint a high representative to oversee Kosovo if asked by the
Kosovo Albanian government and the United Nations Secretary-General.
"It is clear that the future of Serbia and Kosovo lies in
the European Union. That's something that both sides agree on,"
EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana said in an
interview with Germany's Welt am Sonntag newspaper. A troika of
EU, U.S. and Russian mediators told U.N. Secretary-General Ban
Ki-moon in a report on Friday that their mission failed because
neither side was willing to give way on the fundamental question of
sovereignty over Kosovo. The troika had been given a December 10
deadline to complete its report. "We were given 120 days but if we
had been given 1,200 days the outcome would have been the same," an
aide quoted Ischinger as telling Solana. more... |