Europe 2007
Last Updated:
08/22/2009 15:02

This page is to track the news
regarding the
European Union and to a lesser degree, news on the United Nations. I believe the EU could be
the 10 toes of Daniel 2. Herb Peters has a website now run by his daughter
Holly and her husband Adam,
www.FulfilledProphecy.com, that goes into much greater detail. As I am not
much into politics and he has been watching these events unfold for over a
decade, I will refer you to him. Get the overview
here
and read his book,
Recommendation 666.
This page may take some time to load. For
size reasons I have archived topics by year: | 2007|2008|
NAFTA: The Shocking "Rest of the Story" The
Cutting Edge - NAFTA was sold to the American public as a
brilliant economic plan. Very few people realize that they have just
witnessed Biblical prophecy occurring before their
unsuspecting eyes!! In the News!!
"Executive approval:
Survey of American, Mexican, and Canadian executives show they feel
the North American Free Trade Agreement has been successful in
improving trade and logistics. CEO's and other senior executives at
250 U.S., Canadian, and Mexican companies see far more positives
than negatives to the two-year old North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA)". {Industry Week, April 1, 1996, V245, N. 7, page
48}.
"It was the best of times; it was the
worst of times". With these words, the classic novel, "Tale of Two
Cities" began, a novel set in the midst of the French Revolution. Today,
the same thing could be said for Christians. While we are living in the
worst time in American history in terms of declining moral standards,
declining traditional faith, and economic stress, we are also living in
the most exciting time in history. Since Israel was reborn as a nation
in 1948, thus beginning the End of the Age countdown, all the signs of
the End of the Age have been occurring together. In the past, many of
these signs were seen individually, such as rampant wars, widespread
disease, earthquakes, but they never occurred simultaneously as they
have now been occurring. Christians who know their Bibles should be very
excited, because all our beliefs concerning the accuracy of the Bible
are coming to pass, in the daily news, right before our eyes. This is
the purpose of The Cutting Edge, to show you how you can see this
advance to the Tribulation period right before your eyes, in your daily
news. The Biblical term, "Tribulation" or "Great Tribulation" now has a
secular name, The New World Order. Their plans to achieve this new order
so parallel Biblical prophecy that, if you were to envision all Biblical
prophecy about the End of the Age as a photograph, then the plans for
The New World Order could be thought of as the negative, producing the
positive picture! Today's news concerns NAFTA, the North American Free
Trade Agreement, created two years ago, which economically joined
Canada, the United States, and Mexico. Most Americans think of NAFTA
simply and only as an Economic Entity, because that is the only context
in which the media has ever portrayed it. However, the leaders of The
New World Order have long been following a plan to recreate the many
nations of the world into 10 Super Nations. And, not surprisingly, this
Plan fulfills Biblical prophecy! Let us first begin with the New World
Order Plan to create 10 Super Nations. In 1957, Alice Bailey, then the
leader of the House of Theosophy, wrote in her collection of writings,
"The Externalisation of the Hierarchy", that the world must first
be reorganized into Spheres of Influence before it could be organized
into a Global government (Page 209). She made it very clear that this
reorganization would not follow traditional national boundaries, but
would be a completely different organization. Bailey did not specify how
many "Spheres of Influence" would be created, but her plan was fleshed
out in 1974, by New World Order authors, Mihajlo Mesarovic and Eduard
Pestel, in a book entitled, "Mankind At The Turning Point". They wrote
that the world would be reorganized into 10 Super Nation States, listed
below.
10 SPHERES OF INFLUENCE -- NATIONAL
REORGANIZATION
- North America
- Western Europe
- Japan
- Australia, South Africa, and the
rest of the market-economy of the developed world.
- Eastern Europe, including Russia
- Latin America
- North Africa and the Middle East
- Tropical Africa
- South and Southeast Asia
- China
Remember, this New World Order Plan
was published in 1974. Firmly set this date in your mind, as it will
become very important in just a few paragraphs. The first question is
"Why 10 Nation specifically?" The answer lies in a knowledge of the
spiritual beliefs of the Occult. They believe that man is to be
spiritually "perfected" by undergoing the process of "Illumination" by
achieving a long, arduous study of "Hidden Truth". Once a man is totally
perfected, he is pictured as standing "upright" next to, but
uncontrolled, by his world. This perfected man is thought of as the
Number 1, while the world is pictured as a zero (0). Thus, the number 10
forms this picture of perfected man standing apart from his world. The
number 10 is a very important symbolic number to the occultist. ("Magic
Symbols", Frederick Goodman, Brian Todd Publishing House, London, 1989,
p. 46-47). Therefore, when the occultic leaders of the New World Order
devised their plan to reorganize the world into Spheres of Influence,
they acted in accordance with their occultic beliefs in deciding to
create 10 Super Nation states. They were creating a New World Order,
which, by its very structure, screamed to the peoples of the world, "We
have created the 'Perfected" world organization, of 10 Super Nations".
The symbolism is powerful: they are the "Perfected" men, standing apart,
but controlling, the world. Ten had to be the number; Occult Doctrine
demanded it. But, this Plan also fulfills a most important Biblical
prophecy. This prophecy was given to the prophet, Daniel, approximately
2,500 years ago, and is the only prophecy which gives a sequence
of events which God foretold would flow from this creation of
the world into 10 nations. Hang on to your hat, for we are going on an
exciting ride. First, let us review the prophecies. The Bible foretells
in Daniel that there is a sequence of events which will foretell the
appearance of Anti-Christ. Turn with me now to Daniel 7:7-8, remembering
that Daniel is talking here of the End of the Age. Consider the
Scripture: "After this I saw in
the night visions, and behold a fourth beast, dreadful and terrible, and
strong exceedingly ...and it had 10 horns. I considered the horns and,
behold, there came up among them another little horn, before whom there
were three of the first plucked up by the roots..." These 10 horns are
further explained in Daniel 2:41 and Revelation 17:12. These prophecies
are quite clear in predicting that the world in the last days of time,
during the Great Tribulation will be reorganized into 10 Super Nation
States, or 10 Regions. This is a shocking revelation, since the world
has been controlled by individual sovereign nations since the Tower of
Babel 5,000 years ago. Today, there are over 170 sovereign nations in
the world today. A new governmental structure is being silently erected
over these 170+ sovereign nations Before our very eyes, a new government
is being erected; this plan, originally published in 1974 in "Mankind At
The Turning Point", is being implemented. And when it is finally
implemented, it will fulfill this Biblical prophecy of 10 Nations at the
End of the Age. Therefore, you see, NAFTA is not simply an economic
super nation; rather, it is Nation #1 of this 10 Nation New World Order.
Very few people understand this, because they have been conditioned by
our national leadership, aided by our national mass media. No one has
ever explained this before. Now, you can understand why Presidents as
seemingly dissimilar in world view, style and philosophy as Presidents
Bush and Clinton could support the creation of NAFTA. President George
Bush began the push to create NAFTA, but was unable to see it created
before he left for office. President Clinton supported NAFTA, even
though he opposed nearly every other thing for which Bush stood. At this
point, I am going to state a truth which I have carefully enunciated in
my radio programs, and which I will soon state again: The New World
Order Plan was created officially in 1776, and has been consistently
supported by Presidents ever since. In this 20th Century, nearly every
President, both Democratic and Republican, has secretly supported the
Plan for The New World Order. It has not mattered whom we have elected,
because both political parties are united in this drive to accomplish
this Plan. Generally, Republican Presidents have concentrated on changes
in the Foreign Policy field, while Democratic Presidents have
concentrated on the needed changes in Domestic Policy. But, whether we
have a Republican or Democratic President, the New World Order Plan
continues unabated. NAFTA is one example of a Foreign Policy change
initiated by a Republican President and continued by a Democratic
President. more...
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom | NewWorldOrder |
America |
Does this
represent the 10 horns/toes of Daniel and Revelation? Or is the WEU
representative of this control structure? I don't fully agree with
the conclusions of the article and I currently lean toward the WEU
given the other events and power exerted from there applicable to
Bible prophecy and the confirmed covenant with many of Daniel 9:27
currently in progress. However, it is good to keep our eyes open to
possibilities. There is certainly a division of control and power
over the world that will be exerted once the antichrist is revealed.
At the very least, it demonstrates how trade agreements subtly
eliminate sovereignty in the name of business, peace and security
progressing through time. These international legal agreements lead
to an agreement to abide by rules and regulations from outside ones
own country to participate and with the increased fear of terrorism,
this same kind of control can be used in the name of combating
terrorism. It then becomes a question of what defines a terrorist.
Someone who kills other people, or perhaps someone who rejects the
New World Order and the requirements that come with it? How quickly
can public perception on this term be changed? Keep watching and we
will see soon enough.
IDF: Bomb making chemicals were disguised as EU aid
The Jerusalem Post (December
29, 2007) -
The
IDF and Shin Bet uncovered 6.5 tons of potassium nitrate hidden in sacks
that were disguised as aid from the European Union, the army announced
on Saturday. Security forces discovered the stash in the cargo of a
Palestinian truck at a West Bank checkpoint earlier in December.
According to the IDF, the material, hidden in sugar sacks, was planned
to be used by terrorists in the Gaza Strip. "Potassium Nitrate is a
banned substance in the Gaza Strip and the Judea and Samaria region due
to its use by terrorists for the manufacturing of explosives and Kassam
rockets," the IDF spokesperson wrote in a statement. "This is another
example of how the terror organizations exploit the humanitarian aid
that is delivered to the Palestinian population in the Gaza Strip with
Israel's approval," the statement read.
|
Israel
|
Islam
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
Javier SOLANA, EU High Representative for the CFSP, welcomes the
completion of the procedures for the accreditation of EUPOL COPPS Europa
Document (December 28, 2008) -
Javier Solana, EU High Representative for the Common Foreign and
Security Policy (CFSP), today welcomed the completion of the procedures
for the accreditation of EUPOL COPPS and made the following statement:
"I welcome the completion of the procedure that paves the way for the
accreditation of the European Union police mission for the Palestinian
Territories (EUPOL COPPS) by the Government of Israel. I wish to thank
Vice Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Mrs Tzipi Livni for
her support. This agreement will facilitate the implementation of the
mandate of the mission."
The aim of the EUPOL COPPS mission is to work with the Palestinian
civilian police to support the Palestinian Authority in taking
responsibility for law and order, and improving its civilian police and
law enforcement capacity. EUPOL COPPS helps to establish sustainable and
effective policing arrangements under Palestinian ownership in
accordance with the best international standards. This mission is a
central pillar of the EU Action Strategy in support of renewed peace
efforts between Israel and the Palestinians launched in Annapolis last
November.
|
Israel |
Islam |
Dividing the Land | EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Solana |
1st
Seal |
Israel fears clash with U.S. over peace talks' impasse
Haaretz (December 25, 2007) -
The United States will conduct confidential assessments of whether
Israel and the Palestinians are meeting their peacemaking commitments
and share the results privately with the parties, U.S. and Western
officials said. Israel has sought to keep the U.S. process of judging
compliance with the long-stalled "road map" peace plan largely secret.
Palestinians say they favour disclosure of judgments on whether Israel
is halting all settlement activity and whether the Palestinians are
curbing militants as the plan demands. Though the Bush administration
has decided to keep the assessment process confidential, it reserves the
right to go public with its views if necessary, the officials said.
U.S. judgments will be crucial because Israel has said it
will not implement any peace deal until the Palestinians meet their
commitments to combat militants in both the West Bank and the
Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip, where militants continue to fire rockets
across the border into Israel. The monitoring process may be a test of
Washington's readiness to hold a key ally to its commitments. Despite
U.S. and Palestinian pressure on Israel to freeze settlements, the
Housing Ministry said on Sunday 740 new homes would be built in East
Jerusalem next year. Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Palestinian
President Mahmoud Abbas agreed at U.S.-sponsored conference in
Annapolis, Maryland last month to relaunch final-status peace talks with
the goal of reaching a statehood agreement by the end of 2008.
more...
|
Israel
|
Islam
|
Dividing the Land
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
| NewWorldOrder |
America|
And who could step in if the
U.S. is an issue in bringing the peace in the Middle East? Can't
anyone stand up and make a difference? The world wonders and I
couldn't have picked the next story in the list if I had tried. Keep
watching Europe and
the man
who speaks for it.
“We have finally decided that Europe
will speak with one voice, that of Mr. Solana.” |
Jacques Chirac Regarding Solana's visit to Damascus for
the Hariri inquiry
Solana to Restore EU Ties with Syria
(March 9, 2007)
“Solana
has the power and has had it since January 30, 1999. We are speaking with
one voice through Javier Solana.”
| Madeline Albright USA Secretary of State Regarding Solana being given sole power to make all further
military
decisions over NATO Balkan operations.
Big Brother on Stage: What Kind of Actor is the EU? A
Time, Times, and Half a Time (December
25, 2007) -
Rafael Dochao Moreno,
principal administrator of the Euro-Med Partnership, when asked the
question why Spain chose to launch the Alliance of Civilizations
initiative at the United Nations rather than the European Union
responded that the “Barcelona process is already an AoC…why
do we need an AoC?” Moreno’s response reminded those of us
who have been following the Barcelona Process what we’ve already
known--that the Alliance of Civilizations is a
key aspect for the European foreign policy.
The Barcelona Process, introduced in 1995 by Spain’s Javier Solana,
contained a social cohesion strategy which had a goal to combat
religious fundamentalism worldwide. The Alliance of Civilizations is
merely a vehicle for such activity. Right from the start, the AoC
was intended to form the
core of the global counter-terrorism strategy.
Before the cartoon crisis (in which Spain’s Zapatero, Moratinos,
Federico Mayor, and Solana so authoritatively rose to the occasion
to turn
crisis into opportunity),
Spain’s foreign minister had
introduced the idea of the AoC as a tool to combat terrorism.
Incidentally, although no group has ever stepped forward to claim
responsibility or offer rationale for inciting the cartoon crisis,
blame was assigned to “religious extremists” along with the claim
that they seek to provoke a clash of civilizations. There is only
one group that has reaped tremendous political benefit from the
cartoon crisis--it almost reminds me of the Reichstag fire. In a
previous blog post we examined the
Club of Madrid’s 2005
counter-terrorism strategy. As I reviewed the conference pictures
and
list of participants, I
noticed linkages to those who put forth the EU Social Cohesion
Policy and the Alliance of Civilisations initiative. It is not
surprising then that the Madrid Agenda contains identical objectives
to those of the
European Union’s Counter-Terrorism Strategy.
Europe’s counter-terrorism strategy was presented to the
June 2003 Thessalonika European Council
by Javier Solana. Solana’s counter-terrorism strategy, which was
incorporated into the security strategy
A Secure Europe for a Better World,
addresses combating strategic terrorism as its primary objective.
Recall in
Part I of my
counter-terrorism article that strategic terrorism has been
attributed to religious beliefs in which one accepts an
“exclusivist” truth claim. An examination of the EU
counter-terrorism documents yields the same definition. But here we
see the lion’s teeth of militarization. There is an interesting
paragraph in the Thessalonika document which reads:
“…the Danish Presidency decided
to commission a group of Ministers' personal representatives to
submit an analysis of the phenomenon of extreme fundamentalism
and terrorism…The final report has been submitted and will be
further discussed within the Council with a view to taking
forward its recommendations.”
I of course was curious to read this
report but have been unable to do so because a
Decision of the European Ombudsman
ruled that there were politically sensitive evaluations concerning a
large number of foreign states. During my search, I was able to locate a
research report published by
the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs which frequently quotes from the
Extreme Fundamentalism and Terrorism Group (EFTG). It may give us a
glimpse of some of the sensitive issues contained within this report.
For example, I suspect we may find that the EFTG considers Israel an
authoritarian regime:
“In most fundamentalist
transnational terrorist violence, the perpetrators tend to view
the front line to be between Israel and the United States, on
the one hand, and the Islamic world on the other. It involves
the dispute about the US occupation of holy areas either itself
or through proxies such as the authoritarian regimes of Saudi
Arabia and Persia, or Israel. According to the report of the
Extreme Fundamentalism and Terrorism Group (EFTG) the settlement
of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict would have a very important
positive impact on the struggle against extreme fundamentalism
and terrorism.”
This is consistent with the Alliance
of Civilizations’ statements as during the Doha debates Israel’s
government was named an extremist regime. Regarding fundamentalism, the
EFTG says:
"Fundamentalism has been defined
as an attitude where non-negotiable principles are introduced to
politics from a transcendental source, holy texts or a divine
discourse. “From the point of view of fundamentalism, religion
expresses a divine order, which ideally embraces all life
spheres. Although this may simply lead fundamentalists to
encapsulate their own existence around their religious beliefs
(“Quietism”), they will most often actively pursue the goal of
seeking other life spheres, including political one, dominated
by religious rather than secular principles.” Often
fundamentalism has also meant a tendency to impose these
principles indiscriminately on believers and non-believers
alike.”
The
European Commission’s social cohesion research report
further demonstrates that religious fundamentalism will not be tolerated
within the European neighborhood.
"This third school of thought is
referred to as 'civil society as the public sphere'. "Theories
of the public sphere demand a return to the practice of
politics. Not as an elite occupation in which the public takes
part once every four or five years through elections, but as an
ongoing process through which 'active citizens' can help to
shape both the ends and means of the good society…Essential to
the functioning of democracy, according to the line of thinking
of this school, is that all sets of voices are heard. Inequality
and discrimination are therefore seen as the enemies of the
public sphere. Fundamentalism is seen as its most dangerous
enemy, since fundamentalism does not acknowledge the existence
of different truths nor does it respect other values, which
makes it impossible to reach a consensus with other groups...
The only similarity between European policy and this third
school of thought is its aversion to fundamentalism."
As part of the 2007-2013 Cohesion
Policy, member states are bound by agreement to implement European
Security and Defense Policy (ESDP) guidelines. As mentioned earlier, the
European Defense Strategy’s
focus is primarily on combating strategic terrorism. To do so, Solana
has created a military-industrial complex having the following
characteristics (to name only a few):
- The theatre of operations is
global.
- Military assets that operate far
beyond European borders.
- Capacity to conduct offensive in
addition to defensive war.
- In the event not all member
states are in agreement, draw upon a nucleus of states comprising a
permanent structured cooperation.
- Strategic missions will be
organized through coalitions of the “willing and able.”
- A civilian-military crisis
management approach (CIMIC).
CIMIC is a plan which places the civilian population subject to
military authority.
- Crisis management through
EU Battle Groups
- Overcome the divide between
military and criminal intelligence.
- Involve gendarmerie forces in all
types of police missions: crowd control, maintaining public order,
conducting intelligence work, criminal investigations,
counter-terrorism, etc.
- Establishment a citizens’
biometrics database (Schengen
Information System, aka
SIS II and Visa
Information System). These systems were developed in secrecy without
consultation of the European Parliament.
- Gather intelligence through
satellite capabilities and the
Torrejon Satellite Centre.
- The Galileo Navigational System
provides the ability to conduct precision urban warfare (see
An Evaluation of the Military Benefits of the Galileo System).
-
New EU-NATO framework -
Ensure escalation dominance in the essence of
Berlin-Plus.
- Ability to conduct
network-enabled warfare: co-operability with US armed forces having
ability to “plug into” US networks.
- Use of
NATO Response Forces in
crisis management.
-
Provide military capabilities to the UN.
Would include a reserve or an “extraction force” provided to support
a UN operation.
- Activate Western European Union
Recommendation 666 which
places above assets into control of the High Representative (Solana)
in the event of a crisis.
The new EU-NATO relationship has
tripled European capacity for power-projection. The
Prague Summit Declaration , a
blueprint for EU-NATO co-operation, reinforces Solana’s social cohesion
platform:
- We reaffirm that security in
Europe is closely linked to security and stability in the
Mediterranean. We therefore decide to upgrade substantially the
political and practical dimensions of our Mediterranean Dialogue as
an integral part of the Alliance’s cooperative approach to security.
In this respect, we encourage intensified practical cooperation and
effective interaction on security matters of common concern,
including terrorism-related issues, as appropriate, where NATO can
provide added value. We reiterate that the Mediterranean Dialogue
and other international efforts, including the EU Barcelona process,
are complementary and mutually reinforcing.
- Endorse the agreed military
concept for defence against terrorism. The concept is part of a
package of measures to strengthen NATO’s capabilities in this area,
which also includes improved intelligence sharing and crisis
response arrangements.
NATO’s military concept for defence against terrorism
coincides with Solana’s civilian-military approach as NATO’s framework
directs:
- “Act…in support of the
international community’s efforts against terrorism.” [Recalling
that the Alliance of Civilizations social cohesion program is the
core of the counter-terrorism strategy.]
- “Developing an overreaching
international strategy for defence against terrorism.”
- “religious extremism is likely to
be the source of the most immediate terrorist threats to the
Alliance…”
- “Counter Terrorism, primarily
offensive measures.”
- “…winning the trust of the local
population through Psychological Operations and Information
Operations is vital.”
- “Within most NATO nations, civil
authorities, such as the police, customs and immigration
authorities, finance ministries, interior ministries, intelligence
and security services, are the primary agencies involved in dealing
with terrorism and military forces will need to operate in support
of, and in close coordination with all of these agencies. The
Concept therefore states that NATO must harmonise its procedures and
efforts with civil authorities within nations in order to maximize
its effectiveness against terrorism.
This is a tremendous amount of power
to be placed in the hands of one individual. Many of us have often heard
that a picture is worth 1000 words. For a visual representation of the
EU Security and Defense Policy and to grasp Javier Solana’s power, watch
this
Center for International Peace Operations presentation.
(I would recommend you download it as it is likely to soon disappear.) more...
|
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
Solana |
1st
Seal | NewWorldOrder |
America |
EU is increasingly perceived worldwide as a global player Bertlesmann-Stiftung (December 25, 2007) -
International opinion survey: US experiences dramatic
loss of stature - Rapidly growing awareness of environmental threats -
EU recognized as world power. The European Union is increasingly
perceived all over the world as a global power, and is anticipated to
play a major role on the international stage in 2020 after the US, China
and Russia. The US's superpower image is fading, while China and Russia
have risen enormously in stature. There was a spike in many parts of the
world in people's awareness of the dangers of climate change and
environmental devastation. Climate protection and poverty are currently
seen as the most important tasks facing international policy makers.
These are some of the findings of a worldwide opinion poll conducted by
the German foundation, the Bertelsmann Stiftung. According to the
poll, the European Union already enjoys the reputation of a global
player, and was ranked fifth on average by all international
respondents. This picture improves for the Europeans as time goes on.
When asked which nations and organizations would be global powers in
2020, every third person mentioned the EU. On the other hand, the US
lost its undisputed leadership position. While 81 percent of people
would still call the US a world power today, only 61 percent expect it
to retain this position into 2020. Once again, China, India and - more
recently - Russia have greatly boosted their own profiles as global
players. With a 57 percent response rate, China was mentioned almost as
frequently as the US as a future superpower. They were followed further
down by Russia with 37 percent, the EU with 33 percent, Japan with 33
percent and India with 29 percent. Compared to the United Nations,
the EU is perceived as a very strong player in global politics. This
applies in all countries surveyed except India, where the UN has a
higher standing. And in China, the perception of the EU as a world power
rose significantly - by 15 percentage points in the past two years. When
asked if their own country should cooperate more closely with the EU,
the vast majority of the international respondents - 74 percent on
average - said yes. This desire is particularly strong in China and
Russia, where stronger ties with the EU are favoured by 98 percent and
91 percent of respondents, respectively. In the US, these numbers were
78 percent, in Brazil 70 percent, in India 68 percent and in Japan 48
percent. Recent years have seen a shift in perceptions of what
challenges face the world and what goals global players should work
towards. For example, in almost all the countries surveyed, awareness
of environmental threats skyrocketed, while dangers such as global
terrorism were viewed as less urgent. Awareness of environmental
problems has risen more than 10 percentage points worldwide since 2005.
The percentage of people who viewed climate change and environmental
devastation as global threats rose in all countries surveyed, but
especially in the US (+22 percentage points), China (+17 percentage
points) and Japan (+16 percentage points). On average, 54 percent of all
people viewed environmental destruction as the most important threat.
Only in Russia (31 percent) and India (28 percent) did a minority of the
population view this problem as a major threat. At the same time, the
perceived significance of global terrorism showed no change compared to
two years ago. The other key challenges cited by respondents were
poverty and overpopulation, war, resource scarcity, and religious
conflicts and fundamentalism. more...
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
| NewWorldOrder |
The world will get what
the world wants and many will hate God for it. You just can't please
some people. In my opinion, the
global warming deception, along with
global
terrorism and the
UFO agenda, is a tool being used by the enemy to bring about a
global consciousness with no foundation in Truth, the Bible, so that
when the man of sin declares himself to be god at the
abomination of desolation, what
Albert Pike wrote in 1871 regarding the third world war would be
fulfilled and the antichrist will be unleashed as
Michael the archangel stands to cast Lucifer out of heaven.
Truth is stranger than fiction. What boggles the mind is that Truth
will be hated in the world as it gets in the way of the "do what
thou wilt" motto of Aleister Crowley brought out en masse by groups
like the Beatles through to modern rock n' roll. Please watch
They Sold Their Souls For Rock N' Roll to see why I say that.
This has all been planned to slowly chip away at our solid
foundation to deceive the whole world.
1 Timothy 4:1,2
Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter
times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing
spirits, and doctrines of devils; peaking lies in hypocrisy;
having their conscience seared with a hot iron;
2 Timothy 4:1-5
I charge thee
therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge
the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom; Preach
the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke,
exhort with all long suffering and doctrine. For the time will
come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their
own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching
ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and
shall be turned unto fables. But watch thou in all things,
endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, make full
proof of thy ministry.
And so we will be hated in
this world by this world for we are not of this world, but have been
chosen out of it. The world puts faith in men, let us put our faith
in Yeshua.
NATO
Secretary General, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer NATO
highlights by 51 Reasons (December 20,
2007) - On the eve of the festive season I would like to share
with you my thoughts on the months ahead. But first I want to address
the people we owe most in this organisation – the men and women in
uniform. Over 60000 of you currently serve with distinction in NATO-led
operations in different parts of the world. Your dedication, courage,
professionalism and hard work are a credit to you and to NATO. The risks
you take in fulfilling dangerous missions – in Afghanistan, in Kosovo,
in the Mediterranean, as well as providing training in Iraq and helping
logistically the African Union with its mission in Darfur – say so much
about your commitment to security and stability goals. This commitment
is greatly appreciated and embodies the highest standard of excellence
associated with the Alliance. At this time of the year our thoughts are
in particular with the families of those who have paid the highest price
in these operations: your sacrifices will not be forgotten and have not
been made in vain. Next year promises to be just as active as the
passing one. The whole NATO community – civilians and military alike –
will be burning midnight oil to prepare for the key event at the
beginning of April: the Bucharest Summit of NATO. Important decisions
await the leaders of 26 Allied countries. They will deliberate on the
further enlargement of NATO, on strategic guidance shaping the nature of
our continued engagement in Afghanistan and Kosovo, as well as on all
the crucial projects essential for tackling major security challenges
confronting us. This list includes such diverse topics as fight against
terrorism, missile defence, new capabilities, energy security or cyber
defence. I am also convinced that coming months will broaden and
intensify NATO’s dialogue and cooperation with our partners. We will
strive to improve further a team-work approach with the United Nations
and with the European Union. And we will also work more in the framework
of the Partnership for Peace, Mediterranean Dialogue and Istanbul
Cooperative Initiative. We will spare no efforts to resolve existing
differences with the Russian Federation, to support reform efforts in
Ukraine. This is a long list of goals. But NATO is a busy Alliance.
Projecting stability where it is needed. Building global partnerships,
where they make sense. And standing as a unique forum for
transatlantic consultation on security issues. All, as
ever, to preserve the security of the citizens of NATO countries and the
broader international community. NATO will continue to make its
contribution to international security in 2008. I wish you and your
loved ones a safe and happy year. And once again, I send my best wishes,
and warm thanks, to the NATO and Partner soldiers far away from home
during this festive season.
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom | NewWorldOrder |
America |
If you
haven't read through it yet, please check out the
Treaty of Lisbon and how the Alliance of
Civilizations, combating those who claim sole ownership to the
Truth, is being set up to be enforced through Europe and NATO to
combat terrorism with military and civilian forces. The question is
when will the war on the saints, who hold to the Truth of the Bible
that lays claim to sole ownership of the Truth, will begin.
According to Bible prophecy that time is coming and according to the
HIStory, Our Future Bible studies,
that time is just around the corner. 2008 will be a determining year
and if this is accurate, a very chaotic year
full of prophecy fulfilled.
NATO Backs Turkey's Alliance of Civilizations Initiative Todays
Zaman (December 20, 2007) -
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has announced that it
supports the Alliance of Civilizations initiative, co-chaired by Turkey
and Spain. The NATO summit started on Tuesday with the
participation of 26 heads of state and government in Riga, Latvia. In a
joint declaration, NATO leaders expressed their support for the Alliance
of Civilizations initiative. "We support
the collective value and dialogue between cultures and people. Therefore
the Alliance of Civilizations initiative under the aegis of United
Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan is of great importance to us,"
was the announcement made at the end of the summit. Meanwhile, NATO
leaders also invited Serbia, Montenegro and Bosnia-Herzegovina on
Wednesday to begin negotiations for eventual membership in the
military alliance, but urged Serbia and Bosnia to fully
cooperate with the UN war crimes tribunal. NATO leaders resumed their
summit Wednesday with a pledge to stay the course in Afghanistan despite
mounting casualties and the continual refusal of some governments to
send their troops into combat in the most dangerous regions of the
country. "We will stand with the
Afghan people for the long term," NATO Secretary-General Jaap de Hoop
Scheffer told reporters at the press conference held after the
gathering.
|
Islam |
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom | NewWorldOrder |
America |
Signs of the Times |
Well it
appears that NATO likes the goal of the Alliance of Civilizations.
This means that all member nations of NATO will go along with
European military forces to enforce wherever this ends up going. I
don't think it looks good for those who refuse to go along with the
global governance plans.
Brussels names first 'EU ambassador' Telegraph.co.uk (December
17, 2007) - Brussels has appointed the European Union's first
"ambassador" more than a year before the EU Reform Treaty comes into
force, The Sunday Telegraph has learned. The powerful dual role will
involve Belgium's Koen Vervaeke representing both the European
Commission and the EU's 27 member states in Africa. The position is part
of a diplomatic corps created under the treaty signed by Gordon Brown in
Lisbon last week amid claims by Eurosceptics of a betrayal of Britain's
national interests. Brussels chiefs have pressed ahead with Mr
Vervaeke's appointment before any countries have begun ratifying the
treaty, which is scheduled to come into effect in 2009. Critics
have accused the commission of riding roughshod over the ratification
process, which in Britain will see the treaty subject to parliamentary
scrutiny and votes over more than 20 days next year. Dr Charles Tannock,
a Conservative Euro-MP and the party's foreign affairs spokesman at the
European Parliament, said: "By appointing this man to Africa they are
obviously testing the waters. This is the way things will work in the
future. But until the treaty is ratified they have no mandate to set up
anything like an EU diplomatic corps." The official Brussels line is
that Mr Vervaeke's role is "an exception". Under the treaty, there
will be a powerful EU foreign minister, or "high representative",
who will also service member states and the commission, deriving his
power from what Brussels officials call a "double hat" arrangement. Javier
Solana, the Spaniard who heads the EU's fledgling foreign office, is
tipped for the job, which will involve taking on more than
100 existing commission delegations around the world and turning them
into a corps of diplomats. Mr Vervaeke, 47, who will be based in Addis
Ababa, Ethiopia, is essentially a regional foreign minister with a
mandate to talk on behalf of the entire EU.
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Solana |
The EU's Treaty Treachery Human
Events (December 17, 2007) - To
millions of Britons, December 13, 2007 is a date which will live in
infamy. In the Labor Party’s 2006 Election Manifesto, the British people
were given a devout promise that there would be a referendum on whether
to sign on to the proposed EU Constitution. Gordon Brown reaffirmed this
vow when he succeeded Tony Blair as Prime Minister in July of this year.
The promise was an empty one. The proposed EU Constitution --
meant to replace all previous treaties -- was already legally dead
thanks to ”no” votes by both the
French
and the Dutch in 2005. But behind the scenes, there has
been treachery afoot these past 30 months. Bureaucrats never
take your “no” for the answer to what they want. Slowly, the Euro forces
began cosmetic surgery. The Constitution underwent a political makeover
and re-emerged as the new EU Reform Treaty, a document which is not only
the same as the failed EU Constitution, but has added even more
bureaucracy to it. On Thursday morning, December 13 in Lisbon,
Portugal, the Presidents and Prime Ministers from the 27 member nations
were to gather to sign this new Treaty. All were present except for
Gordon Brown. He sent his Foreign Minister. David Milliband signed this
historical document on behalf of the UK when the cameras were flashing.
Brown explained his absence as a “conflict of scheduling.” Then
events took a turn toward treachery worthy of a Shakespearian play.
Three hours later, Brown surreptitiously arrived. Cowering in a back
room off the main hall - where he had hoped in vain to avoid the cameras
-- the pusillanimous Prime Minister signed the document. One
EU insider dryly remarked that Brown acted like someone who was trying
to keep a dirty little secret. Brown seems to have imagined that
this out-of-sight out-of-mind tactic would fool the British public.
Hardly. The Shadow (Conservative) Foreign Minister, William Hague, asked
what the members of the EU would think of a man who “dithers for a week
about whether or not he wants to be photographed putting pen to paper.”
To others it was more a case of Brown proving to be as handy with a
knife as Brutus. So just what are the most important points of
the so-called “Reform Treaty” as they impact minor details like, for
instance, British sovereignty? The EU is designed to be a
superstructure entity that creates a single foreign policy and one-stop
overarching decision-making powers which will be directed downwards to
all its member states. Until now, the heads of the 27 member nations
served six month rotations as nominal EU President. That egalitarian
practice is now dead. There is to be a
new all-powerful unelected President of Europe, appointed by the 27
heads of state - not elected by the 350 million people of new Europe.
(Frustrated Democrats who have never gotten over the US 2000 election,
please note). Tony Blair, former Prime Minister of the UK, has been
heavily tipped to take over this coveted post. Although the initial idea
of a single EU Foreign Minister was abandoned in this round of “ever
closer union”, the new Treaty calls for a Foreign Policy Chief
-- who will hold diplomatic status and head up the new EU Foreign
Service bureaucracy. What’s in a name? Perhaps
everything. Great Britain and Poland asked to opt out of signing on to
the 50-article Charter of Fundamental Rights -- for the time being. This
charter promises life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and religions
freedom. It then goes on to promise universal collective bargaining,
fair working conditions and shelter. Yes, shelter. No one in the New
Europe will be allowed to be homeless. The UK continues to demure on
joining the Euro. But this Treaty puts yet more pressure on Great
Britain to ditch the Pound in favor of New Europe’s collective currency.
The most sinister part of the Treaty is contained in another rule. This
one gives the EU rights to overturn decisions made by Britain’s
Immigration and Asylum Tribunal. Those who have sought -- and have been
rejected -- as asylum seekers in the UK now have the right to take their
cases over the head of Great Britain’s highest court and appeal to the
unelected European Court of Justice in Luxembourg whose EU bureaucrats
will have the final say. Giving the EU authorities power to trump
immigration and border issues inside the UK is seen as the end of their
democracy by many a Brit. When the EU Court of Justice can overrule any
member nation’s own judiciary, another piece of national sovereignty has
been signed away. The output of venom directed against the Prime
Minister since Wednesday’s dirty deed has been stunning. The most
vociferous critics of Brown’s stealth execution of the treaty are
calling for his severed head to be skewered on a pike and set above the
Thames. This was often the fate of traitors in earlier times. The
British have such colorful traditions. Others have suggested that the
Tower of London be re-commissioned to serve as a prison for Brown and
his minions. Calls have been raised for a million people to surround the
Houses of Parliament in a massive protest where this Treaty must be
ratified in the House of Commons. Two full weeks of debate have been
promised the public -- but then promises come cheap in politics. Brown
himself has been compared to Neville Chamberlain, who returned to
England from Germany in 1938 waving a paper which Adolph Hitler had
written promising that there would be no future war. British veterans
and their heirs must surely wonder why two world wars were fought and
millions of lives lost if the British sovereignty would eventually be
surrendered -- by their own government -- to their former continental
enemies. Brown is also now being parodied in cartoons and editorials
which compare him to that bumbling silent English loner, Mr. Bean. After
all, the wags point out, Brown doesn’t like to even mingle with his EU
counterparts. Brown bungles about like Mr. Bean, although Mr. Bean’s
awkwardness and its consequences are inadvertent. And like the bumbling
Mr. Bean, since Brown went slinking off to Portugal to sign away his
country’s autonomy, Brown has mumbled to the English press that the new
EU treaty "would provide a lasting framwork for the EU" yet at the same
time create "a circle of reflection" on the EU's long term future. Of
course, there is a technical flaw in that observation. Gordon Brown
isn’t English. He’s a sly and canny Scot. Come to that, so is Tony
Blair. Many a wary English eye is now being cast north of Hadrian’s
Wall. Just a few months ago, the ever more powerful Scottish Parliament
voted to give every one of its citizens free health care, the costs for
which will be taken out of English pockets. Is the new Europe Reform
Treaty part of the Great Scottish Plot? Is this Braveheart’s Revenge?
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Solana |
nonymouse from FulfilledProphecy shared this
USA Today story pointing out that the
President of Europe "will have few
formal
powers but will chair leaders' summits and
meetings and help the EU's foreign policy chief represent the
bloc on the world stage."
The initial story points out
what I think may be the 3 horns from
Daniel 7:7,8 that
are plucked with the little horn (man of sin) arising from the 10
since the French, Dutch and British rejection of the Constitution
has been circumvented in the
Treaty
of Lisbon.
What is Happening to Europe? Frontline
Fellowship (December 17, 2007) -
Europe is in danger of falling to Islam. The catastrophic
decline of Christianity in Europe and the sharp decline in the birth
rate, along with massive Islamic immigration, has made Europe vulnerable
to an Islamic takeover. Secular Humanism and Hedonism have
gutted Europe, morally, spiritually and ethically. Most Europeans have
replaced the pleasure of worship with the worship of pleasure.
Materialism and Occultism have, in too many areas, filled the spiritual
vacuum. Abortion, pornography and perversion have devastated the morals
of Europe. History is repeating itself . Europe today
is facing a similar Renaissance of paganism and aggressive Islamic
expansionism, which threatened faith and freedom back in the 15 th and
16 th Centuries. There is an urgent need for a new Reformation. Secular
Humanism and Hedonism are no match for Islamic Jihad. Only a vibrant
Biblical Christianity can enable Europe to resist, and defeat, radical
Islam. From the time of the Reformation in the 1500’s, through to the
beginning of the Second World War, Europe was the world’s dominant
trading and industrial region. However, Marxist economies and
dictatorships in Eastern Europe crippled development, eroded national
infrastructures, undermined the ecology and devastated the work ethic,
retarding economic development. In Western Europe, the ruinous World
Wars and costly welfare state with its restrictive practices in trade
and industry slowed down innovative development. By the second half of
the 20th Century, the North American and East Asian economies surged
ahead of those of Europe. After the Muslim invasions of the 7th and 8th
Centuries, Christianity was almost wiped out in its heartlands of North
Africa and the Middle East. For nearly 1,000 years the countries of
Western Europe became the last major refuge for Christianity. The
aggressively expanding and encircling Muslim forces occupied Spain,
overwhelmed the Byzantine Empire, and threatened the very heartland of
Europe, even seizing Budapest in 1527 and besieging Vienna as late as
the 17th Century. Hemmed in by Islam, Europe was effectively prevented
from having any meaningful missionary outreach to Africa or Asia. It was
not until the Reformation in the 16th Century that the church was
revitalized to eventually become a force for world evangelization. The
last 400 years have seen tremendous worldwide advance for the Gospel,
but recently it has witnessed a distressing decline in Europe itself.
The energies that were released by the Protestant Reformation and its
rediscovery of the Bible in the common tongue, led to the most
extraordinary spiritual Revival in history. The Reformation freed the
Christians of Northern Europe from the decadence of Renaissance paganism
and lead to the greatest birth of freedom and scientific discoveries in
history. The Reformation in Europe championed the principles of
religious freedom, liberty of conscience, the rule of law, separation of
powers and constitutionally limited republics. The Reformation forwarded
the explosion of scientific enquiry, the industrial revolution, and the
campaign to eradicate the slave trade worldwide. However, from the time
of the French Revolution in 1789, hostile, anti-Christian ideologies
began to compete with Christianity for worldwide dominance. Secular
Humanism, Evolutionism, Socialism and Marxism have led to terrible wars,
oppression and destruction. With the rise of Secular Humanism a
practical atheism or fuzzy new age spirituality have become the
predominant beliefs of most Europeans. Many Europeans have moved away
from the rock certainties of their Biblical Christian heritage to the
sands of situation ethics, relativism, reincarnation, the new age and
the occult. The popularity of the occultic Harry Potter books
and films are a symptom of this new fascination with witchcraft. Secular
societies in Europe now regard Christian absolutes with intolerance and
Bible believing Christians are frequently ridiculed, marginalised and
even legislated against, with secular governments no longer satisfied
with the deviant being declared normal, but demanding that the normal be
declared deviant. The popularity of fraudulent and fictional
anti-Christian books, such as The Da Vinci Code and The
Gospel of Judas, are symptomatic of the rise of anti-Christian
heathenism in Europe. Much of the blame for the defeat and retreat of
Christianity in Europe must be laid at the door of liberal theology
which rose to dominate theological institutions all over Western Europe
by the beginning of the 20th Century. Most mainline denominations were
spiritually crippled by the deliberate erosion of confidence in the
Scriptures and in the power of the Gospel. The primary results of these
liberal termites has been a massive exodus away from attending liberal
denominations. Large areas of Europe today are post-Christian with a
small, irrelevant, committed Christian remnant with little impact on the
broader society. Most of Europe needs to be evangelized again. Many
areas of Europe have not had meaningful exposure to Biblical
Christianity for several generations. William Booth, the founder of the
Salvation Army, over a century ago, warned that a time may come when
Europe would have: “A religion without the Holy Spirit, Christianity
without Christ, Forgiveness without Repentance, Salvation without
Regeneration, politics without God, a Heaven without a hell and a
Saviour without a cross.” That describes many churches today and
underlines the urgent need for a new Reformation. As Alexander
Solzenitzen declared of Russia in 1917: “We forgot God!”
Those who forget the lessons of the past are doomed to
repeat its failures. We need to rediscover our history if we are to
survive the present threats. more...
|
Islam |
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Major Outcomes
of the Alliance of Civilizations Forum Alliance
of Civilizations (December 15-16, 2007) -
Announcement of a
Global
Youth Employment Initiative, called Silatech, with an investment of
$100 million from H.H. Sheika Mozah bint Nasser-el-Missned and partnerships
with the World Bank and the corporate sector, notably with CISCO, which will
begin with 5 pilot country programs in the Middle East. Announcement of a
multi-million dollar AoC Media Fund that will be a first-of-its-kind nonprofit
large-scale media production company focused on normalizing images of
stereotyped communities and minorities in mass media through partnerships with
major Hollywood production, distribution, and talent management companies.
The Fund was launched with an initial commitment of 10$ million, and an
estimated target of $100 million. Announcement of national and regional
strategies for cross cultural dialogue by governments and multilateral
organizations to advance AoC objectives in their respective countries and
regions. Establishment of partnership agreements, with various multilateral
agencies and organizations, which contain specific terms that will enable the
AoC to leverage networks, contacts, and competitive advantages of partners in
the implementation of its programs. We have signed 5 agreements - with
UNESCO, ARABIC STATES LEAGUE, ISESCO, ALECSO and United Cities and Local
Governments (UCLG) - and a letter of intent with the Council of Europe.
Launch of the AoC Clearinghouse beginning with a theme of Media Literacy
Education, which will catalogue media literacy programs and related government
policies in different parts of the world; and announcements of partnerships
with several universities that will serve as nodes to enliven this clearinghouse
by initiating exchanges and posting materials on the latest development in media
literacy education. Launch of a Rapid Response Media Mechanism
beginning with an online resource that will feature a list of global experts in
cross-cultural issues, who are available to comment or to talk to journalists,
particularly in times of major cross-cultural crises. Establishment of a Youth Solidarity Fund aimed at providing grants to support youth-led programs in
the areas of intercultural and interfaith dialogue. Moreover, a
decision was made to strengthen the network of youth participants that attended
the AoC Forum and broaden the network to include other youth. Creation of a
global network of philanthropic foundations and private funders, which will
share information; raise awareness of ongoing initiatives, identify mutual
needs; and explore ways to leverage existing resources for greatest impact.
Discussions at the policymaking level that highlight the importance to move the
Alliance forward in 2008 such as: developing joint multi-stakeholders
initiatives at the regional level aimed at promoting a better inter-cultural
understanding, and preventing the mounting of tensions and the rise of
extremism; contributing to the upgrade of the inter-cultural dialogue among the
two banks of the Mediterranean Sea; launching a number of activities within the
framework of active and city diplomacy. Establishment of an Alliance network
of good will ambassadors made up of prominent, high-profile,
internationally recognized figures drawn form the worlds of politics, culture,
sport, business and entertainment to help in promoting the work of the
Alliance, highlighting priority issues and drawing attention to its
activities. Commitment by the United Nations Global Compact to producing a
publication aimed at raising the visibility of best practices in the corporate
sector toward supporting cross-cultural relations. Signing of an
action-oriented statement of solidarity and joint commitment by diverse
religious leaders toward the goal of advancing shared security and peace
and providing youth with guidance to counter extremist influences.
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom | NewWorldOrder |
Notice all the focus on
indoctrinating, I mean educating, the youth as well as the general population
through Hollywood and the media. Hmm, funded by the world bank and the corporate
sector too with partnership agreements in multilateral agencies and
organizations. Included are action-oriented statements of solidarity and joint
commitment by diverse religious leaders. The problem is that the AoC's objective
is to fight against those that claim sole ownership to the Truth in the name of
peace and security. This automatically makes fundamental Islam, Judaism and
Christianity enemy number 1. Now the fruits of these different religious
ideologies can be seen in the actions of their believers as dictated by their
respective holy books. Anyone unwilling to give up their fundamental beliefs
will eventually be generalized as an enemy to peace and security as well as
those trying to implement it. I think this will be the
war on the saints prophesied. And with this media/education blitz, how do
you think those who don't want to participate will be looked upon? The world
just wants peace, and those sticking to their beliefs, whether dangerous or not,
stand in the way of a socialist dictatorship as described in Bible prophecy
under the man of sin.
“The conscious and intelligent
manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses
is an important element in democratic society. Those who
manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an
invisible government which is the true ruling power of our
country. We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes
formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard
of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic
society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must
cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a
smoothly functioning society.” | Edward L. Bernays
(Sigmund Freud's nephew and author of
Propaganda: How the Media Molds Your Mind
1928)
“The
meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism.”
| Karl Marx, Socialism
(in Marxist theory) the stage following capitalism in the
transition of a society to communism, characterized by the
imperfect implementation of collectivist principles.
EU
leaders sign landmark treaty BBC
News (December 13, 2007) - EU
leaders have signed a treaty in the Portuguese capital, Lisbon, that
is expected to greatly alter the way the 27-nation body operates.
The treaty creates an EU president and a more powerful foreign
policy chief. The document, signed at a ceremony at the city's
historic Jeronimos Monastery, also scraps veto powers in
many policy areas. It is a replacement for the EU
constitution, which was abandoned following French and Dutch
opposition. EU leaders insist that the two texts are in no way
equivalent. But the Lisbon treaty incorporates some of the draft
constitution's key reforms, and several governments face domestic
pressure over the document. In a speech before the signing, European
Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso called on European leaders
to use the treaty to make freedom, prosperity and solidarity an
everyday reality for all European citizens. "From this old
continent, a new Europe is born," he said. Portuguese Prime Minister
Jose Socrates, whose country holds the rotating EU presidency, said
the treaty would create a more modern, efficient and democratic
union. "The world needs a stronger Europe," he said. The leaders
signed the treaty, translated into the EU's 23 official languages,
using specially engraved silver fountain pens as a choir sang
Beethoven's Ode to Joy. UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown signed
the treaty later in the day after missing the ceremony, citing a
prior engagement in the British parliament. Foreign Secretary David
Miliband attended the signing ceremony. The UK's opposition
Conservatives accused Mr Brown of "not having the guts" to sign the
treaty, which is politically controversial in Britain, in public.
Having started this year with a celebration of its 50th birthday,
the EU hopes the signing of the Lisbon treaty will end the serious
mid-life crisis brought about by the death of the constitution, the
BBC's Oana Lungescu reports. There will be a lot of relief, said a
senior European diplomat, but also some apprehension about what
happens next. Ireland is the only country planning to hold a
referendum, but most voters there seem either undecided or
indifferent. Parliaments in Britain, the Netherlands and Denmark are
also expected to give a turbulent reception to the 250-page text.
However, Germany, France and Poland have pledged to be among the
first to ratify it, so that the new reforms can come into force in
2009 as planned. The treaty is a
slimmed-down version of the European constitution, with a more
modest name and without any reference to EU symbols such as the flag
and anthem. It is meant to ease decision-making, by scrapping
national vetoes in some 50 policy areas, including sensitive
ones such as police and judicial co-operation. There
will also be a foreign policy chief, controlling a big budget and
thousands of diplomats and officials, and a permanent EU president
appointed for up to five years. But some already fear that instead
of giving Europe a strong single voice in the world, the new posts
will only generate more rivalry, our correspondent adds.
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom | NewWorldOrder |
According to Bible prophecy, this
consolidation of power will continue despite opposition to it
and eventually all will wonder at the beast and worship him when
he declares himself god. Except those for whom
the coming war on the saints
will be waged.
Revelation 13:4-8
And they worshipped the dragon which gave power
unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who
is like unto the beast? Who is able to make war with
him? And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great
things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to
continue forty and two months. And he opened his mouth in
blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his
tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven. And it was given
unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them:
and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and
nations. And all that dwell upon the earth shall
worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life
of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.
Russia, France, Germany, Algeria and US Training Fatah Commandos Israel
National News (December 13, 2007)
- PA Arabs belonging to the Fatah terrorist group loyal to PA
President Mahmoud Abbas are being trained in Russia, France, Germany
and Algeria for “counter-terror” operations against Hamas. According
to the New York Daily News, the PA forces are receiving covert
training at a secret Russian base in Moscow in an effort to stave
off a Hamas takeover of Judea and Samaria. The Fatah men are being
trained by Russian commandos who fought Islamist terrorists in
Chechnya. The PA force is named “al-Himaya Wal-Isnad" (defense and
reinforcement) according to the report and includes 25 PA
intelligence officers. The course will last for a month and will
involve extensive weapons and combat training. According to the Daily News report, similar training courses are
being provided in France, Germany and Algeria – with plans to send
PA units to other countries for training as well. "They are getting
good training over there," PA official Dr. Ibrahim Khraishi told the
Daily News. Meanwhile, in Judea and Samaria, PA forces
continue to receive equipment and training from the US, with
General Keith Dayton continuing to oversee the program even after
the American-supplied arms and equipment supplied to Fatah in Gaza
was inherited by Hamas with little resistance shown by Fatah forces.
Dayton even testified to Congress just a few weeks before the fall
of Fatah in Gaza, saying that the PA forces his men trained had
progressed significantly. Abu Yousuf, a Fatah terrorist from
Abba's own Force 17 security forces, told WorldNetDaily earlier this
year that while some of the weapons may be used in confrontations
against Hamas, the bulk of the American arms and training
would be utilized to "hit the Zionists." He also said if
there is a major conflict with Israel, U.S. weapons provided
to Fatah may be shared with other "Palestinian
resistance organizations."
|
Islam |
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom | NewWorldOrder |
America |
What side are we on? The bottom line is that Islam has a
common enemy, everyone that isn't Muslim - and especially hatred
for Israel. So could this conflict between Hamas and Fatah a
deceptive way to get arms for their future plans to destroy the
nation of Israel as foretold in the Bible? How far does this
conspiracy go? Are our leaders really that ignorant? What is the
goal of
Islam?
Blair
ducks MK question about Jewish state
Jerusalem Newswire (December
12, 2007) -
Israeli parliamentarians were reportedly furious December
12 when former British Prime Minister Tony Blair refused to answer a
question directed at him about Palestinian Liberation Organization [PLO]
Chairman Mahmoud Abbas' [Abu Mazen’s] recently reiterated refusal to
recognize Israel as a JEWISH state. While the PLO has consistently held
to its refusal to acknowledge and agree to Israel being a Jewish state,
it began to more blatantly and vociferously express this position in the
week before last month's Annapolis conference. And it has repeated its
position since. Blair, who is in Israel in his new role as special envoy
on behalf of the so-called Quartet of world powers, was addressing the
Knesset [Parliament] Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee when one of
its members, Likud MK Limor Livnat, questioned him on the issue.
"Members of the committee were furious when Blair did not answer,"
reported the leftist daily, Haaretz. The international community is
widely understood to agree with the Arab point of view that there should
be no Jewish state per se, but that the Jews who live in the Middle East
should agree to being citizens of a one-man-one-vote state. By contrast,
the Jews who founded Israel believed, as does virtually the entire
nation as it exists today, that a Jewish state is essential if they are
to survive as a people in this almost universally anti-Jewish world.
|
Israel
|
Islam
|
Isaiah 17
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
Dividing the Land
|
France
scores symbolic victory against Turkish EU membership EU
Observer (December 12, 2007) -
France has scored a symbolic victory in its battle against Turkey
joining the European Union by succeeding in removing the word
'accession' from an EU document on the state of negotiations. A
statement on the EU's enlargement strategy, agreed by foreign
ministers in Brussels on Monday (11 December), refers only to an
intergovernmental conference with Turkey and Croatia later this
month, rather than to accession or membership negotiations. The
normal phrasing for these meeting to discuss progress on membership
negotiations is "accession conferences." But France, strongly
opposed to Turkey joining the EU, got its way yesterday after
putting diplomatic pressure on for around two weeks before the
meeting. Britain and Sweden were amongst the countries that were
against the French move. "We do not see any rationale for
backtracking either on the Treaty of Rome or on these commitments,"
Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt said before the meeting,
according to Reuters. French president Nicolas Sarkozy has made no
secret of his staunch opposition to Ankara's membership bid. It
featured during his presidential campaign in the first half of 2007
while after his election Mr Sarkozy suggested Turkey become a member
of a Mediterranean Union he wants to set up and that the EU's final
borders are discussed in a wise committee - both suggestions are
seen as part of an overall aim to derail Turkey's bid. Germany is
also against Turkish EU membership, but has been less vocal at the
European level on the issue than France. It prefers instead a
privileged partnership - essentially granting Ankara closer ties
with the EU but no decision-making powers. Turkey opened membership
talks with the EU in 2005. But it has only made small progress so
far. Talks have been blocked in a number of areas because of
Ankara's position on Cyprus - it refuses to trade with it - while
France has blocked the opening of talks in areas that smack too much
of leading to EU membership. Turkey itself has also been slow to
undertake internal democratic reforms, which has led to criticism
from the EU side. more...
|
Gog/Magog |
Islam | EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
With rejection by Europe, who will Turkey turn to? Most
likely, and according to Bible prophecy, Turkey will align with
the Islamic side and participate in the attack on Israel. Keep
watching!
EU to agree Kosovo talks over Reuters (December
9, 2007) - EU leaders are expected to agree this week that
efforts to reach a negotiated solution to the Kosovo problem are
exhausted, and offer to take responsibility for security and justice
in the breakaway Serbian province. But Russian Foreign Minister
Sergei Lavrov said on Sunday "artificial deadlines" for finding a
solution to Kosovo's status were not binding and could raise risks
to stability. EU negotiator Wolfgang Ischinger will brief
European Union foreign ministers on Monday on the results of four
months of mediation efforts and urge them to help stabilize the
Balkan territory by sending in police and justice officials
soon. Leaders of the 27-nation bloc are expected to declare
in a statement at a summit on Friday that negotiations are at an end
and that the future of both Serbia and Kosovo lies in the
European Union, diplomats said. They are also likely to
confirm they are willing to dispatch police and justice missions and
appoint a high representative to oversee Kosovo if asked by the
Kosovo Albanian government and the United Nations Secretary-General.
"It is clear that the future of Serbia and Kosovo lies in
the European Union. That's something that both sides agree on,"
EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana said in an
interview with Germany's Welt am Sonntag newspaper. A troika of
EU, U.S. and Russian mediators told U.N. Secretary-General Ban
Ki-moon in a report on Friday that their mission failed because
neither side was willing to give way on the fundamental question of
sovereignty over Kosovo. The troika had been given a December 10
deadline to complete its report. "We were given 120 days but if we
had been given 1,200 days the outcome would have been the same," an
aide quoted Ischinger as telling Solana. more...
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Solana |
1st
Seal |
Dictator at the Door A
Time, Times, and Half a Time (December 8,
2007) - During Kofi Annan's presentation to the General Assembly
of the United Nation's Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy, he applauded
the
Club of Madrid
for its related efforts in countering terrorism. In
2005, the Club of Madrid conducted a democracy, terrorism and security
conference which is said to have been the largest gathering of security
and terrorism experts that has ever taken place. Annan delivered the
keynote address to the closing plenary where he conveyed that he would
form an implementation task force dedicated to fighting terrorism and
that all the UN system would play a role. We know that the role of
setting the "global conscience" is being fulfilled by the Alliance of
Civilizations High Level Group. One need not look too far on the list of
conference participants to find individuals connected to the Alliance of
Civilizations. Noteworthy participants include John Esposito,
Giandomenico Picco, Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, Javier Solana, etc.
Here, I provide a summation of the conference outcome documents. In
Addressing the Causes of Terrorism,
identification of the problematic individuals are found on pages 27-33.
The core of the experts’ argument is that religion can contribute to a
‘culture of violence’, a condition which must be addressed to stop the
spread of terrorism.
“…religion is often ‘centered around themes that
can be inherently polarizing—concepts of truth, notions of good,
of absolutes and ultimate realities’. For this reason, religion
can contribute to a culture of violence where violence becomes
‘a defining issue’ in the identity of activist groups.”
In
Part I of this series, we
see that Alliance of Civilisation’s High Level Group member John
Esposito equates monotheistic religions’ exclusive truth claims with
terrorism. In light of Esposito’s contribution to this
counter-terrorism strategy, it’s no surprise that the question “Is
violence more frequently linked with monotheistic traditions?”
resulted in the following answer:
“Samuel Peleg pointed out that
the monotheistic religions (Christianity, Judaism and Islam)
have a tendency to authoritarianism and intolerance due to
‘their centrist emphasis on a single deity’. Esposito said that
the ‘three Abrahamic traditions’ have been ‘more prone to
exclusivist theologies/worldviews which can be used by political
and religious leaders to legitimate imperialist expansion,
violence, and terror’. Elorza gave explanations of why – in his
view – Islam and Judaism had a propensity towards violence and
Buddhism did not. Other members of the group stressed that some
strands of Hinduism, Sikhism and Buddhism have also been capable
of hideous acts of terror, and that these acts have been
justified by violent images and themes within these Eastern
traditions. Moreover, the distinction between ‘monotheism’ and
‘polytheism’ is much debated by scholars of comparative religion
who point out that a supposedly polytheistic religion such as
Hinduism has a strong sense of unity behind its diversity, and
that notions such as the Christian Trinity and concepts of
sainthood introduce a complexity into the idea of God in the
supposed monotheisms of Western religions.”
Maybe the monotheistic faiths are too complex for
these individuals. So they concluded: therefore, responding to
terrorism: “Multi-track approaches (involving political, social and
economic in parallel with security and military measures) should be
employed.” The
Confronting Terrorism working papers lay out these multi track
approaches. I subtitled my copy “Directives for a Police State”. There
is a common thread running through the three main counter-terrorism
strategies which I focus on —one which migrates the military from
battlefield situations and embeds it into the populations. This is
referred to as peace-keeping. (I will address this further in my next
blog article.) This approach is intended for global implementation.
Among the Club of Madrid's plans of action are:
- “Legal standards need to be improved by
harmonising penal and police laws, as well as by ratifying and
implementing the relevant United Nations Conventions and Protocols
and similar regional agreements.”
- “Creation of a global citizens’ network.”
- “Transformation of the armed forces - We
do not see a need for dedicated counter-terrorist forces as special
branches of the military establishment. Rather we would see this
role, as well as the anti-terrorist and consequence management
roles, as fitting in with what might be considered to be the
emerging model for Western armed forces…models geared to
peace-keeping (with only a limited capacity for self defense and
dependent upon local consent).”
- “The experiences of the humanitarian
interventions as well as the counter-terrorist operations of recent
years point to a need for lighter, more agile forces, drawing on
modern technologies (for example in combining the ability to track
targets and attack them with precision) while understanding the
difficulties when it becomes necessary to mingle with civil society
and the overall political context within which operations are
conducted.”
- “Biometrical identification systems will
increasingly be used in travel documents as well as in other
transactions.”
Travel documents for a world without borders?
Hmmm. But, of course, all of this is intended to be conducted within the
framework of and with sensitivity to democracy—that is “safe democracy”.
The Alliance of Civilizations Giandomenico Picco has provided us with
direction on what form of democracy we may expect under this
weltanschauung. I noticed after I published
my first article in this series that the Club of Madrid had removed
Picco’s article from their website. I have attached it to the top of
this piece for educational purposes. It can also be found on
safe democracy foundation’s
website. Simply click on each document to expand it so it becomes
readable. According to Picco:
- “Now the challenge which faces most of our institutions,
which are part and parcels of the system of indirect democracy,
is whether they can evolve to meet a world where there
are many ways to express the voice of the people besides elections
and where knowledge is so wide spread that a group of few cannot
claim monopoly on the truth. The participation of the peoples in
elections is diminishing in many societies.”
- “I would venture to say that of the democratic
institutions the first to evolve would be the Parliament: no longer
the monopolist of the voice of the people, nor of knowledge
for the people, they may have to reinvent themselves…”
- “Our societies are likely unprepared for that kind of democracy
as we have never experienced it. But for how long can we keep the
door closed?”
Well this is one weltanschauung that amounts to nothing more than old
fashioned fascism--a relic of extremist ideology has been tested before.
Ultimately, it will become known as the most terroristic regime the
world has ever known.
|
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
Solana |
1st
Seal | NewWorldOrder |
Treaty amending the treaty on European Union and the treaty establishing
the European community The "Lisbon Treaty"
WEU Assembly Documents (December
3, 2007) - The following are excerpts from the document linked
above. The purpose is to show in the documentation how power
consolidation is being made such that all resources will be available to
the High Representative over the military and civilian forces of the EU
and UN:
Article 9e page 9
2. The High
Representative shall conduct the Union's common foreign and security
policy. He or she shall contribute by his or her proposals to
the development of that policy, which he or she shall carry out as
mandated by the Council. The same shall apply to the common security
and defence policy.
3. The High Representative shall
preside over the Foreign Affairs Council.
Article 13 page 9
3. The common foreign
and security policy shall be put into effect by the High
Representative and by the Member States, using national
and Union resources.
Article 19 page 11 -
With the LISBON TREATY Solana has a foot in the UN security Council and
has the EU countries there work for his interests:
"Member States which are also members
of the United Nations Security Council will concert and keep the
other Member States, and the High Representative, fully informed.
Member States which are members of the Security Council will, in the
execution of their functions, defend the positions and the interests
of the Union, without prejudice to their responsibilities under the
provisions of the United Nations Charter. When the Union has defined
a position on a subject which is on the United Nations Security
Council agenda, those Member States which sit on the Security
Council shall request that the High Representative be asked to
present the Union's position "[…]
Article 9e page 12
2. Furthermore, the Conference
recalls that, as regards the High Representative of the Union for
Foreign Affairs and Security Policy whose term of office
will start in
November 2009 at the same time and for the same
duration as the next Commission, he or she will be appointed in
accordance with the provision of Articles 9d and 9e of the Treaty on
European Union.
from A/WEU [2007] DG 7 3 December 2007
FIFTY-THIRD SESSION
_______
TREATY AMENDING THE TREATY ON EUROPEAN UNION AND THE TREATY ESTABLISHING
THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY THE “LISBON TREATY” Provisions concerning the
Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), including the Common Security
and Defence Policy (CSDP) more...
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
Solana
|
1st
Seal | NewWorldOrder |
Please read the
Coming War on the Saints post to see how this connects to all
power being given to the man of sin over the world in the coming
years. I think time is very short and we are now seeing the year
from the
HIStory, Our Future studies in EU documentation as a time
that powers will be implemented giving control to Mr. Europe. Read
more about the
Treaty
of Lisbon
The Coming War on the Saints
Watchman Wordpress
(December 7, 2007) - This collection
of information regarding the building war on religious fundamentalism
and the military and civilian resources built into law to deal with it
and power over them shifting toward Javier Solana. Read
Constance Cumbey,
Bjorn
(farmer),
Richard Peterson and
Fulfilled
Prophecy for more detailed, focused and up-to-date information on
these developments. On the political end, this is confirming the
conclusions of the
HIStory, Our Future timeline of events leading to an
abomination of desolation in 2009.
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
Solana
|
EU embassy mergers 'are step closer to a superstate' Daily
Mail (December
6, 2007) - Europe yesterday took another big step towards
becoming a superstate by proposing joint EU embassies throughout the
world. The suggestion comes only days before the signing of the
controversial EU treaty, which will create a European diplomatic service
and a new post of EU foreign minister. The European Commission unveiled
plans yesterday for travellers to be able to use the consular services
of any EU country and suggested members could merge their embassies. It
also proposed standard rules on the type of help that should be given to
European citizens when abroad. EU foreign relations commissioner Benita
Ferrero-Waldner said: 'We need to step up co-operation at EU level and
work with member states to protect our citizens.' Under the proposals,
travellers who run into problems abroad would be able to use the
consular services of any of the EU's 27 members. There would also be
standardised rules on the difficult problem of repatriation of corpses
from abroad. Any of the EU's 490million citizens are already supposed to
be able to use another member state's consulate if their country is not
represented abroad. But co-operation between countries' embassies and
consulates is patchy. The commission said it wanted to make consulates
more aware of their duties regarding EU travellers who lose a passport
or get arrested. Last night a commission official who helped draft the
proposal said: 'When a family member dies abroad, it is a nightmare. I
could imagine a common stance for the repatriation of corpses.' He said
consulates could pool resources by, for example, allowing a small EU
country to use a consulate belonging to a larger member. The commission
said EU citizens make 80million trips a year outside Europe and up to
50million EU citizens live outside Europe. There are only three
countries outside the EU where all 27 members are represented - China,
Russia and the U.S. The proposals come days before the signing of the
European Reform Treaty, formerly the European Constitution, in Lisbon.
Shadow Foreign Secretary William Hague said: 'It is a good thing for EU
countries to help each others' citizens abroad where they don't have
embassies. 'But the EU Commission's proposals go far further than that.
This is a clear step towards an EU takeover of British consulates.'
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Solana | NewWorldOrder |
Recommendation 666 Emergency Powers Incorporated Into EU Treaty Fulfilled
Prophecy (December 6, 2007) -
Here's big news for students of end-times
prophecy. The Assembly of the Western European Union has just released a
consolidated version of the provisions of the "Lisbon Treaty" (the
European Union's new Reform Treaty) that relate to the EU's common
foreign and security policy. The document shows how the Lisbon Treaty
incorporates the emergency powers from the Western European Union's
Assembly Recommendation 666. This means
that, in the event of a crisis, the new High Representative of the Union
for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy will have the same extraordinary
powers to step in and take control of the EU's military that the old
High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy did. This
appears to, in effect, enshrine Recommendation 666 into the new treaty.
Compare the clause from the Lisbon Treaty with the
correlating clause from Recommendation 666.
The Lisbon Treaty says (see
Article 16, page 10): 2. In cases requiring a rapid
decision, the High Representative, of his or her own motion, or at the
request of a Member State, shall convene an extraordinary Council
meeting within 48 hours or, in an emergency, within a shorter period.
The WEU's Assembly Recommendation 666 says (see
No. 12):
12. Support proposals for the WEU
Secretary-General and CFSP High Representative to preside over the
PSC and civilian crisis-management machinery and give him powers to
convene the Council of the European Union in the event of an
emergency;
Bjorn Freiberg,
of Europe, a long-time contributor on the FP discussion board, talks
about this in depth at
his blog. To learn more about the prophetic implications of WEU
Assembly Recommendation 666, read about it
here. Staying tuned!
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Solana
|
To keep up-to-date on the
research of fellow watchers, read or join the discussion at
Fulfilled Prophecy.
EU embassy mergers 'are step closer to a superstate' Daily
Mail (December
6, 2007) - Europe yesterday took another big step towards
becoming a superstate by proposing joint EU embassies throughout the
world. The suggestion comes only days before the signing of the
controversial EU treaty, which will create a European diplomatic service
and a new post of EU foreign minister. The European Commission unveiled
plans yesterday for travellers to be able to use the consular services
of any EU country and suggested members could merge their embassies. It
also proposed standard rules on the type of help that should be given to
European citizens when abroad. EU foreign relations commissioner Benita
Ferrero-Waldner said: 'We need to step up co-operation at EU level and
work with member states to protect our citizens.' Under the proposals,
travellers who run into problems abroad would be able to use the
consular services of any of the EU's 27 members. There would also be
standardised rules on the difficult problem of repatriation of corpses
from abroad. Any of the EU's 490million citizens are already supposed to
be able to use another member state's consulate if their country is not
represented abroad. But co-operation between countries' embassies and
consulates is patchy. The commission said it wanted to make consulates
more aware of their duties regarding EU travellers who lose a passport
or get arrested. Last night a commission official who helped draft the
proposal said: 'When a family member dies abroad, it is a nightmare. I
could imagine a common stance for the repatriation of corpses.' He said
consulates could pool resources by, for example, allowing a small EU
country to use a consulate belonging to a larger member. The commission
said EU citizens make 80million trips a year outside Europe and up to
50million EU citizens live outside Europe. There are only three
countries outside the EU where all 27 members are represented - China,
Russia and the U.S. The proposals come days before the signing of the
European Reform Treaty, formerly the European Constitution, in Lisbon.
Shadow Foreign Secretary William Hague said: 'It is a good thing for EU
countries to help each others' citizens abroad where they don't have
embassies. 'But the EU Commission's proposals go far further than that.
This is a clear step towards an EU takeover of British consulates.'
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Solana | NewWorldOrder |
IAEA: US Iran report matches UN agency Associated
Press (December 4, 2007) - A new
U.S. intelligence review that concludes Iran stopped developing a
nuclear weapons program in 2003 is consistent with the U.N. atomic
watchdog agency's own findings and "should help to defuse the current
crisis," the organization's chief said Tuesday. "Although Iran still
needs to clarify some important aspects of its past and present nuclear
activities, the agency has no concrete evidence of an ongoing nuclear
weapons program or undeclared nuclear facilities in Iran," International
Atomic Energy Agency director-general Mohamed ElBaradei said in a
statement. ElBaradei said he viewed "with great interest" Monday's
release of a U.S. National Intelligence Estimate that said Tehran halted
nuclear weapons development in late 2003 under international pressure.
The chief U.S. envoy to the IAEA, Gregory L. Schulte, said the U.S.
assessment contained "some positive news" and raised hopes of a peaceful
and diplomatic end to the standoff. "It does make us more hopeful that
diplomacy can succeed, but for diplomacy to succeed, we still need to
keep the pressure on while giving Iran a negotiated way out," Schulte
told reporters in Vienna. But "Iran's nuclear file is not closed," he
said, adding that the U.S. report "shows we were right to be concerned."
The U.S. report noted that Iran continues to enrich uranium, and senior
officials in Washington said that means it still may be able to develop
a weapon between 2010 and 2015. Monday's finding was a shift from two
years ago, when U.S. intelligence agencies said they believed Tehran was
determined to develop a nuclear capability and was continuing its
weapons development program. It suggests that Iran is susceptible to
diplomatic pressure, the officials said. more...
|
Iran |
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
America |
UN kicks off Bali climate conference Associated Press (December
3, 2007) - Faced with melting polar ice caps and worsening
droughts, climate experts at a massive U.N. conference Monday urged
quick action toward a new international pact stemming an increasingly
destructive rise in world temperatures. A key goal of the two-week
conference, which opened with delegates from nearly 190 countries in
attendance, will be to draw a skeptical United States into an agreement
to cut emissions of carbon dioxide and other so-called greenhouse gases.
While the U.S. delegation declared it would not be a "roadblock" to a
new agreement, Washington remains opposed to steps many other countries
support, such as mandatory emissions cuts by rich nations and a target
for limiting the rise in global temperatures. The American position
suffered a blow Monday when the new Australian prime minister signed
papers to ratify the Kyoto Protocol climate pact. The move leaves the
U.S. — the world's top emitter of greenhouse gases — as the sole
industrial power not to have joined. Conference leaders urged delegates
to move quickly to combat climate change. "The eyes of the world are
upon you. There is a huge responsibility for Bali to deliver," said Yvo
de Boer, the executive secretary of the conference. "The world now
expects a quantum leap forward." The conference kicked off amid growing
global momentum for dramatic action to stop rising temperatures that
scientists say could lead to swamping of coastal areas and islands by
higher oceans, the wiping out of species, economic havoc and a spike in
natural disasters such as storms, fires and droughts. The Bali meeting
will be the first major conference of its kind since former Vice
President Al Gore — due to arrive next week — and a U.N. scientific
council won the Nobel Peace Prize in October for their environmental
work. The immediate aim will be to launch negotiations toward a pact to
replace the Kyoto Protocol when it expires in 2012, and set an agenda
for the talks and a deadline. The U.N. says such an agreement
should be concluded by 2009 in
order to have a system in place in time. more...
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Earth Changes |
Rockefeller and the New World Religion Old-Thinker
News (December 2, 2007)
"Internationalism must first be a
state of mind, an ideal, a chivalry, a religion, before it can
be a reality and a system." -- Samuel Zane Batten, The New
World Order, 1919
The Rockefeller family, while they
are by no means the only major players in world affairs, have
contributed large amounts of resources to the creation of a world
government. Utilizing vast monetary resources which were initially
amassed by the oil empire of John D. Rockefeller Sr., their efforts
have gone into nearly every area of significance. From politics,
media, to education, the Rockefellers are a force to be reckoned
with. [1] One vitally important and often overlooked method of
influence that the Rockefellers have enjoyed is in the realm of the
church and religion. It comes as little surprise, given their long
term goal of world government, that the Rockefeller family would
approve of and support a societal outlook favorable to globalism.
The use of religion is one method that, in Rockefeller's eyes,
looked to be a promising means of accomplishing this goal. Early
programs such as the Interchurch World Movement focused on the
maintenance of harmonious relations between people in America's
growing industrial society. Later endeavors such as the World
Council of Churches would trend towards being global in nature with
goals moving beyond that of simply maintaining class stability in
America to elimination of national sovereignty and world governance.
While some methods have been changed over time, and names of
organizations have been altered, the overarching agenda of
Rockefeller has remained the same. As the documents will show,
multiple attempts have been made to urge the Christian churches to
get behind programs for world governance. If the attempts were not
spearheaded by Rockefellers themselves, significant financial
support was provided to organizations sharing their vision for the
world. A discernable pattern emerges, with the ability to look back
at history, that escalating world crises have served as convenient
launching points for incrementally larger pieces of the world
government agenda. If this pattern continues - and there is little
doubt that it will - we will inevitably see greater pieces locked
into place after future crises. On May 31, 2007, speaking in
Istanbul Turkey at a conference organized by Akbank [2], Henry
Kissinger alluded to this pattern of crises, stating that,
"...The
outcome in Iraq will depend on something that a German philosopher,
Immanuel Kant said... someday there will be universal peace. The
only question is whether it comes about through human insight, or
whether it comes about... through a series of catastrophes of such a
magnitude that people are so exhausted that they have no other
choice." [3]
Utopian ideals of a world civilization
and a world government have always existed. No matter how well meaning
and egalitarian they may sound, history has shown us that centralized
systems almost always lead to corruption and abuse of power. Given the
actions of the Rockefeller family in providing support to the Bolshevik
revolution, [4] their instrumental role in the spread of eugenics
policies to Nazi Germany, [5] and David Rockefeller's proud exclamation,
"Some.. believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the
best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as
'internationalists' and of conspiring with others... to build a more
integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you
will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it,"
[6] it would seem that the solution of world government is rising out of
crises that the proponents of such a system are fostering. It should be
reiterated that while the Rockefeller family has been involved with
promoting the ideas of world government and actively pursuing its
formation, the idea did not originate with them. Utopians throughout
history have promoted ideas of a world civilization and a world
government, often with humanitarian aims. For example, as documented by
Frederick Charles Hicks in his 1920 book "The New World Order",
Royal Society member John Bellers presented in the year 1710,
"...an
elaborate proposal to Parliament for a confederation of states to do
away with war. It contained also a proposal for a convocation of all
religions." [7]
The Interchurch
World Movement (1919 - 1920)
In the aftermath of the bloody
conflict of World War I, the League of Nations was presented as a
solution to the horrendous problems that the world had witnessed. During
the same time period that the League of Nations was formed, John D.
Rockefeller Jr. launched the Interchurch World Movement (IWM) in 1919.
[1] The Interchurch World Movement was the first attempt by Rockefeller
to consolidate the churches into a corporate like structure which would
exercise control over their activities. The "stability of government",
and the promotion of "harmonious relations" between people in an
industrial society that the Rockefeller family was already dominating
was a driving force behind the IWM. Charles E. Harvey, professor of
history at California State University, wrote a history of the
Interchurch World Movement in a 1982 paper titled "John D.
Rockefeller, Jr., and the Interchurch World Movement of 1919-1920: A
Different Angle on the Ecumenical Movement". Harvey traces
the roots of the "social gospel" and the resulting battle between
fundamental Christians and liberalism back to Rockefeller's Interchurch
World Movement. Upon investigating the IWM, Harvey found that
the historical information that most historians and researchers were
using to research the IWM had been directly prepared by the lawyer of
John D. Rockefeller Jr., a man named Raymond B. Fosdick. The doctored
information, writes Harvey, was "...compiled precisely to conceal the
real role Rockefeller played in the organization." more...
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom | NewWorldOrder |
America |
Apostasy |
Killing with a Clear Conscience
A Time, Times, and Half A Time (December 2, 2007)
- Global
Counter-Terrorism Strategy Part I: In my early
writings on this blog space, I warned of
the Militarization of the Alliance of Civilizations. A militarized
Alliance of Civilisations is necessary for the High Level Group (HLG) to
successfully conduct a war on extremism and terrorism. Most people
consider those objectives to be positive. I may have too had I not read
the AoC’s definitions of terrorism. When Kofi Annan first introduced the
AoC, he said that the problem (civilizational tensions) is not with the
faiths, but with the faithful. The AoC has since expanded on this
statement. Accordingly, if you read a religious text and apply an
interpretation that becomes an “exclusive” truth claim, you have thereby
entered a theology of hatred and have terrorist leanings. That, they
say, is a root cause of terrorism. During the
Doha Debates
HLG member John Esposito said:
“I think the danger of religious extremism can be,
even though it's not necessarily violent, when it becomes
exclusivist in which is basically says, 'Not only is my faith right,
but your faith is absolutely wrong, and not only is my faith right,
but my faith position within my faith is right, and so another
Muslim who disagrees with me is wrong,' then you're moving into a
very dangerous position here because you're bordering on what I
would call theology of hate. That kind of mentality can easily be
used by some, and it has been used by people like Osama Bin Laden,
to legitimate military action at a certain point. You can easily
slip over the line once you're into that realm of what I would call
theology of hate, and we see that with elements of the Christian
right, the Jewish right, and with elements of the Muslim right. I'm
avoiding the word fundamentalism here, but you know what I mean.”
This poses a significant problem for most monotheists
as our religious texts make exclusive truth claims. What escapes
Esposito’s attention is that most of us enjoy freedom—we can choose our
faiths and worship as we please. We respect and defend others’ rights to
do likewise. This is called respect, not hatred. Perhaps Esposito’s
vision of democracy is entirely different than mine.
As I took an in-depth look at the
United Nations
Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy, it was not surprising to find the
Alliance of Civilizations and the United Nations Educational, Scientific
and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) at its core. This “comprehensive”
strategy contains “measures to address the conditions conducive to the
spread of terrorism”. The strategy and its related documents can be
found at the UN’s
Uniting Against Terrorism
website. While reading through the many
documents, an item of interest in the
recommendations document
caught my attention
which reads:
“I also urge the United Nations Office on Drugs
and Crime, in collaboration with the United Nations Interregional
Crime and Justice Research Institute, to continue its work…”
Nearly a year ago I had archived a counter-terrorism
piece from the Office on Drugs and Crime’s website which says:
“Religious groups often claim to be in possession
of absolute truth, and some terrorist groups do the same. Religion
also appears to offer the terrorist a seemingly ‘moral’
justification for immoral deeds. Human rights violations are
‘justified’ in the name of an invoked ‘divine law’”
(This link is no longer on the website, but the same
material can be found
here.)
This prompted me to check and see if the Interregional Crime and Justice
Research Institute shared the same wisdom. Sure enough, I found
counter-terrorism material by Giandomenico Picco. Picco was Kofi Annan’s
personal representative who worked on the Dialogue Among Civilizations
project and later was instrumental in
the startup
of the Alliance of Civilizations initiative. Picco’s contribution to
the AoC is certain to have a significant impact world’s religious
populations as he has most disturbingly defined terrorism which can be
found in UN publication
International Terrorism and Governmental Structures.
Here Picco explains that there are two types of terrorism, those being
tactical and strategic. Tactical terrorist are associated with groups
such as Hezbollah. Hezbollah, Picco explains, has a both a political and
military branch whereby negotiations are possible. Strategic terrorism
is based on religious belief. It is altogether different--more
radical—of which there can be no negotiation. more...
|
Signs of the Times
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
Solana
| NewWorldOrder |
Let me remind you
what Albert Pike's position is regarding the plans for the
New
World Order:
"Then everywhere, the
citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world
minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers
of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with
Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be
without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without
knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true
light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine
of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This
manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement
which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism,
both conquered and exterminated at the same time."
Unclear EU treaty troubles leaders Web
India 123 (December 1, 2007) -
European leaders who have agreed to a new treaty for the European Union
are trying to figure out what the document means. The Reform Treaty
gives the president of the European Commission, the president of the
European Council and the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs
and Security Policy responsibilities that overlap,
The EU Observer reported. That could mean the division of labor depends
on who has the stronger personality at any given time. Slovenia holds
the EU presidency for the first half of 2008. Igor Sencar, the Slovenian
ambassador to the union, said at least 40 items in the treaty need to be
clarified before it takes effect in
2009. EU officials are already displaying
nervousness about the treaty, Sencar said.
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Solana |
The Hammer and Tongs behind the Hugs of Annapolis DEBKAfile
(December 1, 2007) -
No one at UN headquarters in New York remembers a case of
a draft resolution being abruptly withdrawn hours before a UN Security
Council session was scheduled to approve it. This is what happened to a
US draft that would have endorsed President Bush’s announcement three
days earlier at the Annapolis Middle East conference of Israeli and
Palestinian consent to work toward a settlement of their conflict before
the end of 2008. The Council had been called into closed session
Thursday night, Nov. 30 to endorse the Annapolis declaration. The text
was buried hastily in an undignified scramble by the Bush administration
after two days of sharp words between the White House and prime minister
Ehud Olmert and his threat not to turn up for talks with the
Palestinians. This incident led also to the first real falling-out
between President George W. Bush and his secretary of state Condoleezza
Rice. He blamed her for seeking to bolster the Annapolis declaration
by Security Council endorsement, thereby exposing the hyped-up event to
the world as a charade and his own declaration as too flimsy to stand up.
The head of the Israeli mission, Danny Gillerman, denied being fully
briefed on the American text - a diplomatic figure of speech which
applies equally to the situation of the Israeli delegation at the Middle
East conference in Annapolis and since. But as soon as the Israeli
ambassador heard that Khalilzad had obtained the consent of the five
permanent members of the Security Council to a closed session for
approving the US draft, he urgently alerted Olmert and Livni in
Jerusalem. Gillerman warned them that a closed session means that
neither Israel nor the Palestinians would be present or given a hearing.
And that was not the only undesirable aspect:
1. The Arab side, which is
represented by Qatar, would use the opportunity to augment the
Annapolis declaration with additional clauses detrimental to Israel,
and possibly win US assent.
2. Security Council endorsement
would obligate Israel and the Palestinians to bring negotiations to
a conclusion by the end of 2008, less than a year hence, as demanded
by Saudi Arabia. Either side could face being found in violation
of a UN resolution.
3. The Security Council would
become the overseer of the Israeli-Palestinian peace process with
authority to reconvene and weigh up progress. In other words,
the bilateral Israel-Palestinian conflict would be relegated to
international authority. Israel has always resisted this since
the odds in the world body are traditionally weighted against the
Jewish state.
Ambassador Gillerman alerted the
Israeli prime minister and foreign minister to the short distance from
UN sponsorship of the process to the dispatch of international troops to
the region as a buffer between Israel’s counter-terror forces and the
Palestinian terrorists ruling the Gaza Strip and West Bank. In the
Israeli ambassador’s opinion, the US initiative to bring the world body
in as a party to the Annapolis declaration originated with Secretary
Rice. She sought to punish Israel for not following her lead at the
conference. He pointed out that the application to the UN directly
contravened Rice’s own accords with the Israeli foreign minister.
Gillerman’s heads-up to Jerusalem sparked an urgent series of phone
calls between the prime minister’s office and the White House. Olmert
made no bones about threatening to pull out of the entire diplomatic
track charted at Annapolis if the Security Council were to be brought in
over its head. After 36 hours of hammer and tongs, US ambassador to the
UN, Zalmay Khalilzad, was instructed to call off the Council session and
withdraw the text. But recriminations on the American side for an
unprecedented loss of face were just as bitter. The White House accused
state department officials of egging Rice on to circumvent the
agreements Bush and Olmert had concluded and running off half-cocked to
the world body in a manner which left the administration red-faced.
Khalilzad was urgently recalled to Washington. When State Department
officials pushed the blame for the shambles on him, accusing him of
drafting the Security Council resolution without consulting the
secretary of state, the US ambassador’s aides shot back with a strong
denial. This incident also brought to the surface the frustrations
experienced by Israel’s delegation to the Annapolis conference, DEBKAfile’s
political sources report. US officials consistently neglected to inform
Olmert or foreign and defense ministers Tzipi Livni and Ehud Barak of
steps pre-coordinated with the Palestinians and Arab ministers,
presenting them as accomplished facts. When Israeli leaders flew out of
Washington Wednesday night, Nov. 28, none had yet been informed that the
White House had named Ret. Gen. James Jones to chair the
“US-Israel-Palestinian mechanism” accompanying the Palestinian-Israel
talks. When they read about it in the media, Olmert protested the
general's role, and it was downgraded to liaison officer. Neither did
the Americans bother to inform Israel about consultations with the
Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov for a follow-up conference in
Moscow at the beginning of 2008. There, Israel will be required to agree
to the return of the Golan to Syria.
|
Israel
|
Islam
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
1st
Seal
|
Dividing the Land
|
America
|
It seems
America isn't as "in control" of the peace process as they might
like to be. Herb Peters wrote in
De-Facto Power:
"Today's news is about
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's trip to the Middle East
and a possible three-way summit between Rice, PA Chairman
Mahoud Abbas and Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert
Read about it here. Earlier
this month, while in Washington, it was announced that Solana
would be following in Rice's steps. And, after closed door talks
at the Madrid+15 Conference, I believe Solana may have expressed
the new feeling of most of the international community. Solana
said, "the moment of action has come"
Read about it here."
July 20, 2006, Rice met with Solana to discuss the Middle East.
Given some of the quotes regarding the source of policy, many things
seem to point to Solana. I wonder what the results of that meeting
were. Could Rice be working toward globalist agendas in the peace
process? Bible prophecy specifies the 7-year confirmed covenant with
many comes from the head of
the revived Roman Empire with 10 horns. Given these things I
would expect to see a shift to Europe to handle the Middle East,
whether anyone wants that or not.
Annapolis: A Day for the Prophetic History Books Fulfilled
Prophecy (November 29, 2007) - Organizers
and attendees appear to agree: the Annapolis Conference, Tuesday,
was a success. But more than that, I think it was prophetically
significant. For the first time, the
entire international community -- including the United States,
Israel and even the Arab nations -- gathered to declare their joint
support for the creation of a Palestinian state. Israeli Prime
Minister Ehud Olmert and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas
committed to working for a peace treaty by the end of 2008. (Read
their statement of Joint Understanding
here.) They're now creating a steering committee that will start
continuous negotiations on Dec. 12. Olmert and Abbas will meet every
two weeks to advance the negotiations.
Olmert and Abbas also agreed to begin immediate implementation of
their nation's obligations under the
Road Map for Peace, created in 2003 by the Quartet on the Middle
East (the United States, Russia, the European Union and the United
Nations). They even agreed to let the United States monitor the
implementation of the Road Map and judge whether both parties are
fulfilling their obligations. And, today, the United States
appointed a Special Envoy for Middle East Security -- General James
Jones, an ex-NATO commander -- to help Abbas' government bring
security to Palestine. Read about it
here. Despite the naysayers, I
think we may see a peace deal within the next year. Of course,
that's what we'd expect if we've entered the 70th week of Daniel.
That's not to say there won't be bumps in the road and times when
negotiations look like they've stalled. But we may look back to this
conference as the breakthrough. In my
father, Herb Peters', book, Recommendation 666 (available to
read free
here), he cited the 1992 Israeli election as the first time
Israelis began saying "Peace and safety!" -- when they voted for
Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin who ran on the platform of trading land
for peace. According to 1 Thessalonians 5:3, when they are saying
"peace and safety!" (in other words, when Israel is willing to give
up its God-given land and turn to its enemies for protection) then
destruction will come on Israel suddenly. Note two very similar words in the statement
of Joint Understanding read by Bush at the conference:

This is a formal
declaration made by Israel -- and witnessed by the nations of the world
-- that Israel has chosen to give up its land for peace. And it was a
U.S. president -- sad for me to say -- that pushed for it.
Yes, I think we'll look back on
this day as prophetically significant.
|
Israel |
Islam |
Dividing the Land |
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Solana |
1st
Seal |
America |
Unclear EU treaty
provisions causing 'nervousness' EU
Observer (November 28, 2007) -
Although the ink has barely dried on the EU's new treaty, analysts are
already scratching their heads as to how the document, with its unclear
division of power between the EU's top politicians, is going to work in
practice. Come 2009, when the Reform Treaty is supposed to click into
place, there will be three big jobs to be had in Brussels - the
president of the European Commission; the president of the European
Council and the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security
Policy. The three have overlapping job descriptions that are set to be
defined only by the strength of the personalities involved, meaning that
the treaty, agreed in October after years of wrangling, could be laying
the ground for a political hornet's nest. Igor Sencar, Slovenia's EU
ambassador, says there are "at least 40 elements" in the treaty that
have to "considered and understood" during the course of next year.
Speaking at the European Policy Centre think tank in Brussels on
Wednesday, Mr Sencar – whose country will run the EU during the first
half of next year – says he already feels the "nervousness" in Brussels
about the lack of clarity in the document. The questions run from
pinning down the exact powers of the EU president; agreeing who the
president will be; to sorting out the funding, personnel and scope of
the diplomatic service as well as looking at issues such as whether the
EU's police body, Europol, needs to be adjusted and how national
ministers will fit into the EU decision-making process. Mr Sencar
indicated that the issues will have to be dealt with by EU leaders and
that a "common view" should be drawn up by the end of next year.
Meanwhile academics and commentators in Brussels are already picking
holes in the proposed political set-up contained in the new treaty. Dr
Andreas Maurer from the German thinktank Stiftung Wissenschaft und
Politik in a recently published paper notes that the future EU
president, who can hold office for up to five years risks becoming EU
leaders' "play ball" because the office lacks its own ministry. "Does
the new president have sufficient personnel, administrative and
financial resources at his disposal" to carry out duties such as
leading, preparing and giving a sense of continuity to leading EU
projects, such as on climate change and energy, asks the paper. It also
questions whether EU leaders will really stand behind the president on
major issues and points out that there could be a "legitimacy" problem
because the president is not actually accountable to anyone – neither
MEPs or MPs. The foreign minister post creates its own set of problems
partly because it is not completely clear where his or her duties begin
and that of the council president and commission president end. Dr
Maurer's paper notes that the new foreign minister, who will be both
vice-president of the commission as well as chairing the regular EU
foreign minister meetings, will have an "unusually large range of
duties." A crucial point will be whether the foreign minister assumes
the trade and development aspects of EU foreign policy when chairing the
foreign ministers' meeting. If the minister does, "it will put into
question" the "autonomy and the political profile of the commission" –
which traditionally has strong powers in this area. more...
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Solana | NewWorldOrder |
According to Bible prophecy, a little horn will rise up among 10.
Daniel 7:7,8 What is happening
according to this article is an orginization of power centered
around the foreign minister position. Commissioners responsible for
trade and development will answer to the foreign minister, and these
three positions are overlapping. We know that 10 kings are going to
give their power and authority to the antichrist.
Revelation 17:12-14 The world will
worship the beast and feel powerless against him.
Revelation 13:1-5 What this all
leads to is the creation of a position that fits with Bible prophecy
in centering power over trade and foreign policy through the WEU,
the 10 member-state military arm of the EU. Is this all coincidence
or are we closer to great tribulation than most realize. Read the
HIStory, Our Future Bible studies for
more Biblical reasoning.
Summary of remarks by Javier SOLANA on the occasion of the Annapolis
Conference Europa
(November 27, 2007)
- NEW MOMENTUM IN THE
PEACE PROCESS: Recent developments have created a sense of cautious
optimism for progress towards resolution of the Israeli/Palestinian
conflict. President Abbas and Prime Minister Olmert are engaged in a
substantive and wide-ranging bilateral dialogue. The United States
Government is actively supporting their efforts, including by calling
for an international meeting before the end of the year, in order to
launch a bilateral negotiation process that would lead to the
establishment of a Palestinian state. The new momentum in the peace
process benefits from the full backing and active involvement of the
Quartet. Arab support has been expressed through the voice of the Arab
League follow-up Committee. Comprehensive peace in the Middle East is a
strategic objective for the European Union. Any lasting and just
settlement to the conflict should be based on the principle of land for
peace, relevant UNSC resolutions, the Arab Peace Initiative, the Roadmap
and previous agreements reached between the parties. The EU considers
that the present opportunity should not be missed and is ready to take
its responsibilities, in accordance with the vital European interests
involved. The EU is therefore committed to supporting current efforts in
a serious and substantive way, offering a comprehensive and coherent
contribution to the process, including during the crucial implementation
period. The European Union calls on all other interested parties to
support the current process, bearing in mind the high cost of failure
for everyone involved. The forthcoming international meeting in
Annapolis should launch a bilateral negotiation between Israel and the
Palestinians on final status issues, as a first step towards a
comprehensive settlement of the Arab-Israeli conflict. It should
establish a robust follow-up process under the auspices of the Quartet
and with the involvement of the international community. The EU calls on
its Quartet, Arab League and other international partners to contribute
to the success of the upcoming donors conference in Paris, which will
constitute an indispensable complement to the political process launched
at Annapolis. more...
|
Israel |
Islam |
Dividing the Land |
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Solana |
1st
Seal |
America |
Olmert Addresses the Annapolis Mideast Conference Washington
Post (November 27, 2007) - PRIME
MINISTER EHUD OLMERT (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): The honorable president of
the United States, George Bush, my colleague, president of the
Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, heads of delegations, and
distinguished guests, I came here today from Jerusalem, Mr. President,
at your invitation, to extend, on behalf of the people of Israel and the
state of Israel, to the Palestinian people and to our neighboring Arab
states, to extend a hand in peace, a hand which marks the beginning of
historic reconciliation between us and you, the Palestinians, and all of
the Arab nations. I had many good reasons not to come here to this
meeting. Memory of failures in the near and distant past weighed heavy
upon us. The dreadful terrorism perpetrated by Palestinian terrorist
organizations has affected thousands of Israeli citizens, has destroyed
families and has tried to disrupt the lives of the citizens of Israel. I
witnessed this when I served as mayor of Jerusalem in days of bombings
at cafes, on buses, and in recreational centers in Jerusalem, as well as
in other cities in the state of Israel. The ongoing shooting of Qassam
rockets against tens of thousands of residents in the south of Israel,
particularly in the city of Sderot, serves as a warning sign, one which
we cannot overlook. The absence of governmental institutions and
effective law enforcement mechanisms, the role of Hamas in the Gaza
Strip, the ongoing activity of murderous organizations throughout all
the territories of the Palestinian Authority, the absence of a legal
system that meets the basic criteria of democratic government, all of
these are factors which deter us from moving forward too hastily. I am
not overlooking any of these obstacles which are liable to emerge along
the way. I see them. But I came here,
despite the concerns and the doubts and the hesitations to say to you,
President Mahmoud Abbas, and through you to your people, and to the
entire Arab world, the time has come. We no longer and you no longer
have the privilege of adhering to dreams which are (inaudible) from the
sufferings of our peoples, the hardships that they experience daily, and
the burden of living under ongoing uncertainty, which offers no hope of
change or of a better future. We want peace. We demand an end to terror,
an end to incitement and to hatred. We are prepared to make a painful
compromise, rife with risks, in order to realize these aspirations. I
came here today not in order to settle historical accounts between us
and you about what caused the confrontations and the hatred, and what
for many years has prevented a compromise, a settlement of peace.
more...
|
Israel |
Islam |
Dividing the Land | EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
America |
Mahmoud Abbas Remarks at Annapolis Conference Washington
Post (November 27, 2007) - SPEAKER:
PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY PRESIDENT MAHMOUD ABBAS (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): In
the name of God, the compassionate, (SPEAKING IN ARABIC) with great
hope, but it is accompanied with great worry that this new opportunity
might be lost. But the meanings of your message are well known and they
carry your personal bridge and commitment by your great country and its
determination to embrace the Palestinian and Israeli peace and the
Arab-Israeli peace to be converted in the arena of negotiations to be
the first and foremost arena for making peace. And that this initiative
would culminate your term of office is an outstanding achievement which
would add a new shining star in the skies of the world, the world of the
future free of violence, oppression and bigotry. And also we would like
to applaud you, Mr. President, for choosing this charming city,
Annapolis, as a venue for convening this international conference. In
addition to its beauty and distinctive location, it bears the symbol of
freedom; the most sublime value in our life. "Freedom" is the single
word that stands for the future of the Palestinians and captures the
meanings of all their generations. It is their sunshine and it is the
life that inspires their future. It is the last word voiced by the
martyrs and victims, and it is the lyric (ph) of their prisoners. I must
also pay tribute to the role played by Dr. Condoleezza Rice and her
aides. For without here relentless resolve and determination and her
vision vis-a-vis all aspects of conflict in our region, we would not
have been convening here. Dr. Rice took important strides with us in
order to affirm that the path of peace is the only choice and it is
irreversible. And that the path to negotiations for peace and to achieve
peace is the right path. It is important for me to indicate here that
this distinguished participation and large participation from sister
Arab and Islamic countries, the quartet, and the group of great
industrial countries, and the permanent members of the Security Council
of the United Nations, and many prominent European and Asian countries,
as well as non-aligned countries and African states and from South
America, in a unique conference in the history of the conflicts would
provide impetus and protection, in addition to the fact that it carries
the meanings of encouragement to pursue the path of Palestinian-Israeli
peace negotiations and move that forward and the need to reach the
solution of two states, based on ending occupation and the establishment
of the state of Palestine side by side to the state of Israel, and the
resolution of all issues relating to the Palestinian- Israeli conflict,
Arab-Israeli conflict in all their aspects, as an indispensable
qualitative step, so that comprehensive and normal peace relations would
be established in our region. I am proud that this Arab and Islamic
contribution and this broad international that this Arab and Islamic
contribution and this broad international participation in the work of
this conference is a testimony to the fact that sister and friendly
states are standing by us, the people of Palestine, as a leadership, and
for our efforts to achieve peace.
It is a support of our approach that calls for a balanced historical
settlement that would ensure peace and security for our independent
state and for Israel, as well as for all countries in the region. more...
|
Israel |
Islam |
Dividing the Land | EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
America |
Text of Bush’s Remarks at Annapolis Conference NY
Times (November 27, 2007) - Here are
the remarks President Bush delivered today at the United States Naval
Academy in Annapolis, Md., as transcribed by Federal News Service, Inc.,
a private firm not affiliated with the government. Mr. Bush’s remarks
opened a meeting of Middle Eastern leaders seeking peace in that region,
and were addressed to the leaders. Thank you for coming. Prime Minister
Olmert, President Abbas, Secretary-General Ban, former Prime Minister
Blair, distinguished guests, welcome to one of the finest institutions
we have in America, the United States Naval Academy. We appreciate you
joining us in what I believe is an historic opportunity to encourage the
expansion of freedom and peace in the Holy Land. We meet to lay the
foundation for the establishment of a new nation, a democratic
Palestinian state that will live side by side with Israel in peace and
security. We meet to help bring an end to violence that has been the
true enemy to the aspirations of both the Israelis and Palestinians.
We’re off to a strong start. I’m about to read a statement that was
agreed upon by our distinguished guests. “The representatives of the
government of the state of Israel and the Palestinian Liberation
Organization, represented respectively by Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and
President Mahmoud Abbas, in his capacity as chairman of the P.L.O.
Executive Committee and president of the Palestinian Authority, have
convened in Annapolis, Maryland, under the auspices of President George
W. Bush of the United States of America, and with the support of the
participants of this international conference, having concluded the
following joint understanding. “We express our determination to bring an
end to bloodshed, suffering and decades of conflict between our peoples;
to usher in a new era of peace, based on freedom, security, justice,
dignity, respect and mutual recognition; to propagate a culture of peace
and nonviolence; to confront terrorism and incitement, whether committed
by Palestinians or Israelis. In furtherance of the goal of two states,
Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace and security, we
agree to immediately launch good-faith, bilateral negotiations in order
to conclude a peace treaty resolving all outstanding issues, including
all core issues, without exception, as specified in previous agreements.
more...
|
Israel |
Islam |
Dividing the Land | EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
America |
EU expected to follow Middle East peace conference with major aid push International
Herald Tribune (November 21, 2007)
-
The European Union goes to next week's Middle East peace conference
ready to back up an agreement with financial aid, recognizing that
without giving Palestinians hope for improved living standards, a
political settlement will remain out of reach. The EU, which will be
represented by its key Mideast envoys and a number of foreign ministers,
is expected, however, to take a back seat to the United States in the
diplomatic drive to restart a peace process between Israeli and the
Palestinians. The conference takes place Monday through Wednesday in
Annapolis, Maryland, and Washington. "The European Union is a bit on the
sidelines for this process. The idea is for the United States to get the
two key players together," said Alfred Pijpers, a senior researcher at
the Clingendael Netherlands Institute for International Relations. "The
European Union will be of great help for financing, and technical
assistance and investments and so on, but as far as the direct,
so-called peace process is concerned, at this moment I don't see a very
immediate and direct activity from the EU side," he said by telephone
from Amsterdam on Wednesday. The EU is the Palestinians' largest aid
donor. In 2007, the EU and its 27 member nations gave close to €1
billion (US$1.48 billion), most of it in humanitarian assistance for
Palestinians who now live under rival governments in the West Bank and
the Gaza Strip. This week, the EU foreign ministers endorsed steps to
support any peace moves emerging from the Annapolis conference, which
will also be attended by delegations from Arab nations. The steps were
outlined in a report written by Benita Ferrero-Waldner, the EU's
external relations commissioner, and Javier Solana, the EU security
affairs chief. The report makes clear EU aid will be made available for
practical purposes: money and technical assistance to boost the
Palestinian police force and to reform the Palestinians' health,
education and judiciary departments. more...
|
Israel |
Islam |
Dividing the Land | EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Solana |
1st
Seal |
Read
also:
EU
planning to back Mideast conference with new measures: text and
an
EU document co-authored by Javier Solana regarding the conference.
North American Union 'a couple years away'
WorldNet Daily
(November 19, 2007)
-
Bilderberg author who 1st exposed plot in 1996 sees EU replication as
imminent. The next giant step toward world government will be
integration of the U.S., Canada and Mexico in European Union-style
merger in the next few years, says the author of a best-selling book on
the power of shadowy international organizations promoting the move. "I
would say [it's just] a couple of years away," reports Daniel Estulin,
author of "The
True Story of the Bilderberg Group." Estulin, a Canadian now living
in Europe, says the original plans for a North American Union involved
the U.S. and Canada as the prime participants. It was motivated
primarily by the desire to harvest Canada's abundant natural resources.
In his new book, Estulin reveals the first efforts in this plan date
back to 1996 when the elite Bilderberg Group first discussed plans for
the dismantlement of Canada as an independent nation and proposed its
merger – minus Quebec – with the United States into a Greater North
America. "Actually, the North American Union, or rather a Canada-U.S.
merger, was initially discussed shortly after the Reagan-Bush candidacy
won the White House," he says in an interview with WND. "Upon taking
over the reins of the country, George Bush and Ronald Reagan called in
the presidents of the key trans-national companies and asked them for
the real picture. The money people told them that if the United States
were a corporation it would have to be shut down immediately. It was
bankrupt." The solution proposed then, according to Estulin, was merger
between the U.S. and Canada. "Canada is virgin country with a multitude
of natural resources, water, mines, oil, gas, etc.," he explains. "They
decided that it was going to take 14 or 15 years to put the whole
project together. In the interval, the economies, social programs and
laws of the two countries would be quietly harmonized as much as
possible." Back then, part of that harmonization plan involved the
separation of Quebec as an independent state, he says. "Actually, when
all is said and done, it all comes down to money," Estulin says. "Money
makes its own rules. If your goal is to make the most money possible
using Canada's natural resources, what would you ask for? Number one,
give me control over the sun. Number two, give me control over the air.
Number three, give me control over water. Now, we know we cannot control
the sun, nor can we control the air. But we can control water. Water,
after all, is the most important element that can be controlled." But
the plot for a North American Union, as exposed in detail in Jerome
Corsi's new bestselling book,
"The Late Great USA," is but a prelude, Estulin says, to the
ultimate merger – one-world government. more...
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
| NewWorldOrder |
America
|
World on the verge of climate catastrophe: UN chief The Times
of India (November 17, 2007) - UN
Chief Ban Ki-moon called on Saturday for urgent action on global
warming, warning the world is on the verge of a catastrophe, as top
scientists were due to issue a new report on climate change for
policymakers. "We all agree. Climate change is real, and we humans are
its chief cause. Yet even now, few people fully understand the gravity
of the threat, or its immediacy," the UN chief wrote in a commentary in
the International Herald Tribune. "I have always considered global
warming to be a matter of utmost urgency. Now I believe we are on the
verge of a catastrophe if we do not act." Ban noted recent acceleration
in the melting of glaciers and polar ice, and pointed out that the
collapse of an at-risk Antarctic ice shelf could raise sea levels by up
to six metres (18 feet), inundating costal cities New York, Mumbai and
Shanghai. "I am not scare-mongering. But I believe we are nearing a
tipping point," wrote the UN chief. Ban will preside over the
presentation Saturday in Valencia, Spain of the UN Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) landmark report intended to help
policymakers facing tough decisions on cutting pollution from fossil
fuels, shifting to cleaner energy and bolstering defences against
drought, flood, storms and other problems set to intensify through
climate change. He characterised the report's conclusions as
"encouraging." "The over-arching message: we can beat this. There are
real and affordable ways to deal with climate change," wrote Ban.
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom | NewWorldOrder |
Earth Changes |
When the prime force behind global governance is ignoring the
facts of global warming (ie the source being increased solar
activity that is warming the other planets too) and trying to
urge action that will result in higher taxes to fix a problem
that can only be fixed if they figured out how to turn the sun's
activity down is a big warning sign to me. Of course I expect
this and I even expect that the world will fall for it and
submit to more taxation that will fill the coffers of the New
World Order to assist them in controlling the population by fear
even more. This is how a blinded population lacking Truth and
facts ignorantly walk off the cliff like lemmings based on a
false trust of the government working to lead the world away
from God and into hell. Some may not even know they are doing
it, but make no mistake about it, Lucifer is behind those who do
know exactly what they are doing and he is the master of
deception. The following is spoken of Israel, but it is true for
all humanity who strays from God's perfect ways of selfless
love. How much does our current state ring true to this as well?
Are we really a "Christian nation," or just a bunch of
disobedient children fulfilling the desires of our hearts? This
is why
God's wrath is coming.
Ephesians 5:1-8
Hosea 4:1-11
Hear the word of the LORD, ye children of Israel: for
the LORD hath a controversy with the inhabitants of the land,
because there is no truth, nor mercy, nor knowledge of
God in the land. By swearing, and lying, and
killing, and stealing, and committing adultery, they break out,
and blood toucheth blood. Therefore shall the land mourn, and
every one that dwelleth therein shall languish, with the beasts
of the field, and with the fowls of heaven; yea, the fishes of
the sea also shall be taken away. Yet let no man strive, nor
reprove another: for thy people are as they that strive with the
priest. Therefore shalt thou fall in the day, and the prophet
also shall fall with thee in the night, and I will destroy thy
mother. My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge:
because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee,
that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten
the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children. As
they were increased, so they sinned against me: therefore will I
change their glory into shame. They eat up the sin of my people,
and they set their heart on their iniquity. And there shall be,
like people, like priest: and I will punish them for their
ways, and reward them their doings. For they shall eat, and
not have enough: they shall commit whoredom, and shall not
increase: because they have left off to take heed to the
LORD. Whoredom and wine and new wine take away the heart.
Solana claims credit for “Roadmap to Peace”
Unsealed Prophecy
(November 15, 2007) - Javier Solana, the
High Representative for the European Common, Foreign and Security
Policy, has pledged that the EU will play a
very important role at the international peace conference to be held
in Annapolis, Maryland later this month. He made the comments during a
press conference in Israel yesterday, convened by the head of the
Israeli negotiating team, Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni. Solana said that
he had discussed a number of issues with Tzipi Livni during his tour of
the region, namely Israel’s desire to upgrade its relations with the
European Union, increasing co-operation in fields such as science and
technology, and they also discussed the need for a third round of
sanctions against Iran in relation to its nuclear programme. He was also
asked questions in relation to Europe’s involvement in the Middle East
peace process. To that, Solana replied that the EU would have an
important presence at the Annapolis gathering, and that the bloc would
continue to play a very prominent role in the region after the event,
taking on the responsibility of a monitoring mechanism, ensuring that
both sides abide by any agreement that is reached. Solana reiterated his
earlier statement, that a peace agreement between Israel and the
Palestinian Authority was “doable” by the end of 2008.
“Question:
Mr. Solana, I would like to ask you what is going to be the role of
the European Union in Annapolis and if you are confident that after
the conference an agreement could be reached in eight or nine
months?
SECRETARY-GENERAL SOLANA: The role of the European Union is to
be part of the Annapolis conference and a member of the Quartet.
Apart from being a member of the Quartet, so we’ll be there. There
will be a very important presence of the European Union and very
important activity and contribution to the process - not only to the
conference itself but also to the mechanism of follow-up, to monitor
it if necessary, etc., etc. Now, you asked me if it’s feasible to
file an agreement at the end of a period of eight months or
something like that. I think by the end of the year 2008, it could
be doable. It could be feasible. I don’t guarantee that will be done
but I think it’s possible.
In regards to the
American-backed “Roadmap to Peace” document, both Solana and Livni
agreed that it was not necessary for the process to intricately follow
the steps written in this document. The Palestinian Authority has not
disarmed or disbanded terrorist organizations operating in its
territory, as detailed in the first stage of the document. As a result,
Israel has not felt obligated to halt all settlement activity in Judea
and Samaria. Instead, the Roadmap to Peace would be used as a final
check, pending the future implementation of any agreement. For his part,
Solana said it was doubtful that the Israelis or Palestinians could
reach an agreement that did not follow along the lines of the Roadmap to
Peace. The US takes much of the credit for initiating the Roadmap to
Peace, following President Bush’s speech of June 2002. But from that
time America has not played much of a peace-making role in the Middle
East. During yesterday’s press conference, Javier Solana stated that
he believed the Roadmap to Peace would be accepted by both sides, and
based this claim on his working knowledge of the document, having
actually written part of the document himself.
“Question:
I’ll ask one question for clarification, with your permission, Mr.
Solana. You’ve been quoted in Egypt as saying that it is not
absolutely necessary that the Roadmap be the point from which both
sides have to depart and it is up to the parties to decide where
they go, with or without that Roadmap. Is it absolutely necessary to
work upon the basis of the road map or are there other avenues?
SECRETARY-GENERAL SOLANA: As you know, if the two parties get an
agreement, they can do whatever they agree to do, with or without a
Roadmap. What do I think? I think that they would not agree on
anything that is very far from the Roadmap and therefore this is
just a metaphorical question. I think that a potential agreement is
around the terms of the first phase of the map. I would not say the
whole of the map, but at least the first phase. I know it by heart
because I wrote part of it. I think that potentially there is a way
to implement whatever agreements may come out of the process that is
happening in Annapolis. And I have the impression that it is
practically agreed that the Roadmap will be accepted by both sides.
If you are wondering
why Solana is referred to as “Secretary
General”, it is because he is the Secretary General of the 10 nation
Western European Union (WEU), the military arm of the EU. He is also
Secretary General of the Council of the European Union, the highest
legislative body in the European Union. So as we can see from
yesterday’s news, the European Union has in the past, and will in the
future, have a direct role in mediating and strengthening a future peace
agreement between Israel and the surrounding nations - just as the Bible
said. According to Scripture, I believe that the identity of the
Antichrist will not be revealed until the Church is removed from the
scene. What is clear is that there are individuals like Solana, heavily
involved in this Middle East peace process, who presently have little
public exposure. Perhaps once we are gone, this will all change.
2
Thessalonians 2:3-8
Let no man deceive you by any means: for [that day shall not come]
(Day of the Lord), except there come a falling away first
(apostasy), and that man of sin be revealed (Antichrist), the son of
perdition (destruction); Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all
that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth
in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God. Remember ye
not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things? And now
ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time. For
the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth
(hinders) [will let (hinder)], until he be taken out of the way. And
then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with
the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of
his coming:
I believe that
according to Scripture, the identity of this Person that withholds the
appearance of the man of sin is none other than the Holy Spirit working
through the Church. For only God can be addressed as both gender-neutral
and masculine at the same time. When the “salt” and “light” of this
world is taken home (Matthew 5:13-14), then the way will be opened up
for the appearance of this man, the Antichrist. Are you waiting for the
appearance of the Antichrist, or the appearance of God’s Son from heaven
(1st Thessalonians 1:10)? Turn to Jesus Christ for salvation today.
Isaiah
26:19-21
Thy dead
[men] shall
live,
[together with]
my dead body shall they arise. Awake and sing, ye that dwell in
dust: for thy dew [is as] the dew of herbs, and the earth shall cast
out the dead. Come, my people, enter thou into thy chambers, and
shut thy doors about thee: hide thyself as it were for a little
moment, until the indignation be overpast. For, behold, the LORD
cometh out of his place to punish the inhabitants of the earth for
their iniquity: the earth also shall disclose her blood, and shall
no more cover her slain.
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Solana |
1st
Seal
|
Dividing the Land |
Israeli relations with the European Union to be enhanced Reuters
(November 14, 2007)
- Israel and the European Union have established a "reflection group" to
find ways to enhance Israeli relations with the EU beyond the existing
and developed relations, with the purpose of expanding pre-existing
Israeli cooperation in European programs. In March 2007, the
Israel-European Union Association Council, headed by Vice Prime Minister
and Minister of Foreign Affairs Tzipi Livni and her German counterpart,
Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier, established a "reflection
group" to find ways to enhance Israeli relations with the EU beyond the
existing and developed relations within the framework of the Israel-EU
Association Agreement and within the framework of the European
Neighborhood Policy. A key part of the enhancement is based on Israel's
incorporation in European agencies and programs in matters of mutual
interest, including: financial issues, research and development, trade,
energy, environmental protection, culture, the media, youth issues, etc.
The purpose is to expand the already existing cooperation in European
programs such as the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme for
Research and Development, the framework of the GALILEO European
Satellite Navigation System project and the framework of the
Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP), which Israel
recently joined. To promote Israel's incorporation into European
agencies and programs, the MFA held an interministerial meeting on
Tuesday 13 November with Dr. Andreas Herdina, head of the Sector
Coordination Unit for European Neighbourhood Policy in the European
Commission in Brussels and representatives of the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Industry, Trade and
Labor, the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Environmental
Protection, the Ministry of Health, the Ministry of Tourism and also the
Bank of Israel, the Council for Higher Education, the Central Bureau of
Statistics, the Manufacturer's Association of Israel, the Standards
Institution of Israel, and the Economic-Social Council. In his opening
remarks, MFA Deputy Director General Rafael Barak emphasized that Israel
has significantly advanced it relations with the European Union within
the framework of the European Neighborhood Policy, and stressed Israel's
ambition to further enhance the relationship. Dr. Herdina stated that
the EU is willing to open additional agencies and programs to Israeli
participation and described the practical means to do so. The EU has
budgeted Euro 8 million to support the operative program with Israeli
ministries for the period 2007-2010.
|
Israel | EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Europe and Peacekeeping Missions in the Middle East
WEU Document C/1985 53rd Session (November
6, 2007) - The WEU is the military arm of the EU - excerpts:
107. The military capabilities exist:
these are the national forces with their ongoing process of
transformation of doctrines, capabilities and technologies. It is up
to the member states to assume their responsibilities and to decide
whether the Union to which they have transferred a portion of
their sovereignty should have access to their capabilities,
for the good of all. A Union that is stronger and more involved
on the international stage also means greater prosperity and
security for its members. The Middle East may well put the Union
sorely to the test, but a passive stance is no longer an option.
It is precisely this Euro-Mediterranean area, the cradle of the
ancient cultures that continues to shape our societies to this
day, that forms the contact point between the “West” and the
Arab-Muslim world. At the end of the day it is a matter of
survival and of our common future.
Solana Links Mideast Peace to
Euro-Med Partnership Fulfilled
Prophecy (November 5,6, 2007)
- Mr
Solana underlined to ministers the importance of the meeting on the
Middle East peace process to be held in Annapolis and the need for all
the parties to play a constructive part. The same was true of the
presidential election in Lebanon: all parties must be constructive. As
regards the Barcelona Process, Mr Solana stressed the importance of
discussing security and energy issues in the Euro-Mediterranean forum
and pointed to the progress made in the past year.
"I would like to
underline two other issues, security and energy. I think that if
we were to talk in any format around this table, in any
geometry, there will always be two points on the agenda, today:
security and energy. On security, I think we are moving beyond
the traditional concept of security and we are increasingly
embracing aspects that are very important to us all. We have a
series of shared problems, including terrorism, natural and
man-made disasters, migration, and many others. On migration, we
must continue cooperating together, more deeply.
Also, on European
Security and Defence Policy, I am very happy that we are
developing our cooperation in this field as part of the
Barcelona Process. We have had had a number of meetings and
seminars in 2007 and we look forward to enhancing our
collaboration and looking at both civilian and military aspects,
with particular emphasis on crisis management. We will be
holding more meetings next year, including one in Rabat, and it
will be very important to continue our discussions, holding
seminars and analysing our cooperation, which is, I believe,
very important.
The second major
subject is energy. Energy is fundamental to our economies and is
also becoming fundamental politically. I would like to underline
that, since the last time we met, there have been important
developments. The nuclear energy plans of many Mediterranean
countries are a very important issue and I think we should talk
about that and also encourage south-south cooperation and see
how we can cooperate on this important aspect which is gaining
increasing momentum in a number of countries around the table
today."
At the joint press
conference with the Portuguese Foreign Minister and President-in-Office
of the Council, Luis Amado, Mr Solana pointed to the strength and
dynamism of the Euro-Mediterranean partnership. The work over the past
year, the communiqué - a joint text agreed by everyone - and the fact
that other countries wanted to join the club, reflected this.
"The meetings today
and yesterday have been very good. This is a group of countries that
many other countries want to join and today we have two new members,
Albania and Mauritania, and that is very good. We have a dialogue on
the Arab-Israeli peace process, we have dialogue on questions
related to energy, to the economy and to civil society and, on these
issues, we have moved on. I would like to say that, from every point
of view, the Euro-Mediterranean process is vital and fundamental and
it is a catalyst for the peace process in the Middle East. Remember
that there is no other place where Israelis and Palestinians, Arabs
and Europeans meet together. On the political dialogue, let me say
that the dinner yesterday was, without doubt, the best there has
been since the beginning, It was devoted to the peace process and we
registered a new feeling of hope, of optimism, that was reflected in
our debate, which was constructive. It left me with the impression
that the process may lead to a solution to the conflict, starting
with the Israeli-Palestinian track. We will see what takes place in
the coming weeks and months. We need a solution that will bring an
end to the occupation and we need a comprehensive solution. Perhaps,
at Annapolis, the mood for this can begin to be created. We will
continue our work together on this. The European Union has a very
important role, particularly within the International Quartet. It is
important also that we spoke yesterday not only of Annapolis but of
the period before Annapolis and the period after Annapolis. After
Annapolis, we will hold the donors' conference in Paris and this is
very important.
The second thing I
would like to underline is that in the matter of security, the
relationship between the European countries and the Mediterranean
countries has matured very much. We are looking at how we can
cooperate on security issues, including issues such as energy
security, which is very important, and migration, which is also very
important for security. We are also looking at the traditional
peace-keeping operations in which we are engaged and which we would
like to open up to members of the Euromed process.
Asked about the
Euro-Mediterranean partnership's position on nuclear energy, Mr
Solana replied that it did not have any fixed positions on energy
and that it was important to tackle the issue of energy policy and
the option of nuclear energy together: "It is true that in the
Mediterranean there has been a change in energy policy with several
countries in the Maghreb having decided to take up the option of
nuclear energy. It is true that we spoke of that to see how we can
help, in an international framework. It is a difficult process,
requiring a great deal of time and investment, and the nuclear
energy option is one that raises security issues. We have to tackle
this issue together and we will continue to work in that direction."
|
Israel |
Islam |
Dividing the Land |
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Solana |
1st
Seal |
EU Holds Talks with Israelis, Palestinians; Praises Olmert Deutsche
Welle (November 5, 2007) - The foreign
ministers will talk separately with senior European Union in Lisbon at the 9th
Euro-Mediterranean Conference which runs until Tuesday, Nov. 6. Discussions are
expected to focus on the Middle East peace process. Tensions are now high in the
Middle East after Israeli air and ground strikes on Sunday killed four
Palestinians, including three civilians. Palestinian militants fired six
missiles at western Israel, causing a power outage in one town. There are not
expected to be any direct talks between Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni and
her Palestinian counterpart, Riyad Malki, but the two of them are expected to
face each other during a dinner Monday with fellow foreign ministers from the EU
and the Mediterranean area. The Euro-Mediterranean Partnership was set up in
1995 and aims on establishing a common area of peace and security and works
toward enhancing cooperation between the EU and 10 of its southern neighbors. The European Union's foreign policy chief Javier Solana on Monday praised the
"constructive" approach of Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to the upcoming
US-sponsored conference on the Middle East, saying it could help
bring peace to the region. Preparations are being made for the international
conference to be held later this year in Annapolis, Maryland, although no
specific date has been set. "Olmert yesterday gave a very constructive speech,
one of his best in recent times," Solana said. "If that is the spirit
with which he is approaching the [Middle East peace] process, I think we have
many chances of having a positive outcome." Solana was addressing
reporters in Lisbon ahead of talks between senior EU officials and the foreign
ministers of Israel and the Palestinian Territories. Speaking in Israel on
Sunday, Olmert said he was willing to deal with the core issues of the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict at the conference. "[The conference] will be the
start of a future process ... we will enter into intense and continuous
negotiations," Olmert said. more... |
Israel |
Islam |
Dividing the Land | EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Solana |
1st
Seal |
EU seeks mediating role in Mideast conflict - looking to develop
Mediterranean Union
Monsters & Critics News (November
3, 2007) - EU officials hope to play a 'constructive' role in
the Middle East peace process when they meet delegations from Israel and
the Palestinian territories in Lisbon on Monday. The talks are due to
take place just hours before a meeting of foreign ministers from Europe
and the Mediterranean area and several weeks before a US-sponsored
conference on Palestinian statehood is due to take place in Maryland.
French President Nicolas Sarkozy, who planned to send his foreign
minister Bernard Kouchner to the Portuguese capital on Monday, has
recently called on Israel and the Palestinians to 'take a risk' and
'make peace'. German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier visited
both Tel Aviv and Ramallah this week and later said talks between
Israelis and Palestinians had entered 'a decisive phase'. During his
visit to the Middle East, Steinmeier unveiled a German-initiated plan
aimed at supporting Palestinian businesses, education and security
services. He said the initiative was designed to allocate European aid
in a timely and organized manner. The EU's executive, the Commission,
has announced its intention of resuming direct financial aid to the
Palestinian government of President Mahmoud Abbas of Fatah. But the
plan, announced by EU External Relations Commissioner Benita
Ferrero-Waldner in Portugal two months ago, has yet to be put into
practice as the EU has yet to finish providing the necessary training to
Palestinian finance ministry officials. Soldiers from Italy and France
are leading peace-keeping operations in southern Lebanon and Israel
tends to view the EU as traditionally pro-Arab. Such feelings were
likely to have been reinforced when Brussels issued a number of
statements criticizing Israel over its decision to reduce the supply of
fuel to Gaza. 'While condemning the unacceptable and continued attacks
on Israel's territory and recognizing Israel's legitimate right to self
defence, the EU underlines the need for carefully weighing the negative
impact of such measures on a civilian population already living under
very difficult conditions,' a statement from the Portuguese presidency
of the EU said. Ferrero-Waldener had earlier described the move as a
form of 'collective punishment' against the people of Gaza. Palestinian
Foreign and Information Minister Riyad Malki was expected to represent
the Palestinians at the talks in Lisbon, while it was not yet confirmed
whether Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni would be attending. Malki
said he planned to inform EU officials about 'the importance of lifting
the siege and sanctions on the Gaza Strip.' more...
|
Israel
|
Islam
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
1st
Seal
|
United Nations to expand police force Associated
Press (November 1, 2007) - With the
world facing new security threats, the U.N. is planning for an
unprecedented expansion of its police missions. U.N. officials say a
shift in the nature of conflicts requires revamped peacekeeping
operations. Traditionally, the U.N. has facilitated peace between
warring states by sending its blue-helmeted soldiers to man buffer zones
between their armies. But today, interventions are increasingly focused
on settling civil wars. "In recent years the character of conflicts has
changed dramatically from mainly state-to-state wars (to) intrastate
conflicts which pit various factions within the boundaries of a single
state," U.N. Police Chief Andrew Hughes said. As a result, there is a
greater need than ever for conventional police duties in post-conflict
situations. Nowhere is this highlighted more clearly than in Darfur. The
U.N. is recruiting nearly 7,000 police officers to assist some 20,000
U.N. peacekeeper-soldiers in trying to end the four-year conflict in
western Sudan. Police involvement in peacekeeping dates from the
inaugural 1948 mission, when first Secretary-General Trygve Lie urgently
dispatched several dozen U.N. security guards from New York to Jerusalem
when Jewish extremists assassinated the U.N. peace envoy Folke
Bernadotte. In later interventions, however, the U.N. has come to rely
mostly on soldiers to monitor cease-fires or interpose themselves
between warring sides, as happened in the Sinai after the 1956
Egypt-Israel war, or later in disputed Kashmir, Cyprus and Lebanon. The
Balkan wars of the 1990s put renewed focus on peacekeeping by police
units. "In such conflicts, once peace is restored the U.N. then has a
key role in re-establishing rule of law, which includes police, courts,
prisons and the whole justice sector, and to ensure that they rebuild or
build up from scratch their police services," Hughes said. "Our duties
included everything a policeman can possibly do, from breaking up
domestic disturbances to chasing and arresting armed criminals," said
Irhad Campara, a Bosnian policeman who served in the U.N. mission in
East Timor. "In addition, we recruited, vetted and trained from scratch
East Timor's new national police force." Whereas military units are
dispatched by governments, police officers are recruited on individual
contracts from contributing nations. They continue to collect their home
pay but receive an extra daily allowance of $150 and accommodation from
the U.N. more...
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom | NewWorldOrder |
Now imagine a
world in chaos where global governance uses the police forces in
conjunction with military forces to enforce peace. Or further along,
enforce worship of the antichrist. It's all leading to prophetic
fulfillment.
EU Report On Turkey Deals New Blow To Ankara's Membership Bid International
Herald Tribune (November 1, 2007) -
In a fresh blow to Turkey's hopes of joining the European Union, a key
report has concluded that reforms there slowed in 2007 because of a
constitutional crisis over the election of a president with an Islamic
background. With attention distracted by tensions between the ruling AK
Party and the military over the election of Abdullah Gul, Turkey did too
little to root out corruption, modernize its judiciary, reduce the power
of the military and increase freedom of expression. The annual progress
report compiled by the European Commission, to be released next week,
comes amid preparations for a new committee on the future of the EU
which may try to determine where Europe's frontiers should lie and how
much further the bloc should expand. Public opinion across the EU is
hardening against Turkey's EU membership bid and President Nicolas
Sarkozy of France leads a group of countries opposed to full EU
membership for Turkey, preferring a looser association with Ankara
instead. Sarkozy has proposed the new committee, scheduled to be
approved by EU heads of government next month, which Turkey fears will
to kill off their membership bid. Anxious
to limit the damage to Turkish accession hopes, a draft of the
commission's report stresses Turkey's strategic importance as a "unique
interface between the west and the Muslim world," a diplomatic and
military partner and an energy hub. But it also makes clear that the
implementation of reforms was "uneven" and "has slowed down since 2005."
The number of those prosecuted for freedom of expression doubled between
2005-6, corruption remains rife and Turkey was found to be in breach of
the European Convention on Human Rights in 330 cases. Earlier this year
the Turkish military spoke out against Gul's candidacy for the post of
president which is one of the central pillars of the secular Turkish
state. The crisis prompted fresh parliamentary elections which returned
the AK Party to power, allowing Gul - whose wife wears a headscarf - to
win the presidency through a parliamentary vote. Though the military
"made statements beyond its remit," parliamentary elections were
conducted properly, the draft report says. "Turkey now needs to renew
the momentum of political reforms," the draft document said. It called
for significant further efforts on freedom of expression, civilian
control of the military, increased rights for non-Muslims, the fight
against corruption and judicial reforms.
more...
|
Gog/Magog | Islam |
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
In
Ezekiel 38,39
we see that Iran, Russia and Turkey are
the three main national players in an attack on Israel that is
stopped by God with fire and brimstone from heaven. We're seeing
the pulling away of Turkey from the West back to their Islamic
roots aligned with Iran and their weapons supplier, Russia. I
expect this relationship with the West to get worse to the point
of Turkey's attack on Israel, but only time will tell.
Guess who Europe's subsidizing? The
Jerusalem Post (October 30, 2007) -
The European Union and its member countries have been subsidizing
various opponents of Israel for many years. A study, just published by
the Dutch Center for Documentation and Information on Israel contains
perhaps the most detailed investigation of one such case. A group called
United Civilians for Peace is a joint venture of five Dutch NGOs. Fifty
to 90% of their budgets
are funded by the Dutch
government and the European Union. A sixth partner left UCP in view of
its extreme anti-Israeli activities. UCP - among other things -
publishes research about "Dutch economic links in support of the Israeli
occupation of Palestinian and/or Syrian territories." Journalist Joost
de Haas, writing in the Dutch Telegraaf summed up the 50-plus
page report by the Dutch Center for Documentation saying: "A peace
organization financed with taxpayers money is guided by the Palestinian
terror organization Hamas and supports the Iranian atom bomb." The EU
and the Dutch government thus indirectly finance Dutch opponents of
Israel. This story is the tip of a European iceberg of financial support
for anti-Israeli bodies. NGO Monitor has exposed various state
agencies which finance extreme anti-Israeli organizations. In an article
in the Swiss daily Le Temps, Gerald Steinberg, who heads NGO
Monitor cited examples of such support by the Swiss Agency for
Development & Cooperation. A few months ago the Jewish Chronicle
wrote that Israeli diplomats intended to raise claims with the Irish
government that its Irish Aid Department was financing
anti-Israeli NGOs some of
which promote the demonization of Israel and boycott actions. The
Swedish International Development Agency is also involved in financing
extreme anti-Israeli groups. IN AN interview with Rijk van Dam, a former
Dutch member of the European Parliament he told me that the government
of Finland had contributed millions of Euros to pay for Palestinian
textbooks which promote the hate of Israel. In 2004 Wall Street Journal
op-ed writer Daniel Schwammenthal detailed how difficult it was to
obtain information on the funding of the PLO by European governments.
This, while the latter claimed their activities were transparent.
Earlier this year the Israeli government criticized the British embassy
in Tel Aviv for contributing funds to a study on the security barrier
and its impact on the Palestinians. A Foreign Ministry source said: "It
is interference by Britain in an internal Israeli matter. How would they
react in London if our embassy was to fund a British research
organization that is trying to promote an agenda critical [of their
government]. This is not acceptable in international relations." AND
THEN there is the abuse by the Palestinian Authority of part of the many
billions of Euros it gets in funding from the EU. Van Dam says: "There
is no doubt that a substantial portion of European funding has served
purposes such as corruption and terrorism." He added that at a meeting
in the European Parliament the then Palestinian finance minister [and now Prime
Minister Salam Fayad] was asked how European money was spent. He replied
that he did not know, not a penny was left, and it had all gone to the
pockets of fat cats.
more...
|
Islam |
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
NewWorldOrder |
It's not too big of a surprise that Europe, and America for that
matter, are ultimately funding those behind the chaos in the
Middle East. Why? According to the plans for a New World Order,
global governance will be brought about through a series of wars
and chaotic struggles that will wear out the people and through
their desire for peace and safety, hand over their freedoms and
sovereignty to one man who will eventually demand worship as
God. Sound preposterous? Don't be surprised when it happens as
the Bible says it will.
Read this
The European Union is the most popular great power - more people across
all continents want to see its power increase
Open Democracy (October
30, 2007) - An ambitious survey of public opinion around the
world contains valuable findings of great interest to the world's
citizens and policymakers alike. The project, conducted by Voice of the
People for the European Council on Foreign Relations and released on 25
October 2007, has discovered: There is widespread support for a more
multipolar world and a greater role for "herbivorous powers" - countries
not widely perceived as military superpowers. There is mistrust of the
cold-war powers as well as Islamist-inspired Iranian autocracy. More
people want to see a decline rather than an increase in the power of
Russia (29 percent decline, 23 percent increase), of China (32 percent
decline, 24 percent increase), of the United States (37 percent decline,
26 percent increase), and of Iran (39 percent decline, 14 percent
increase). On the other hand, there is strong support for an increase in
the power of fast-developing powers such as South Africa, India and
Brazil (the "IBSA" countries). The European Union is the most popular
great power. Uniquely among great powers, more people across all
continents want to see its power increase than decrease. This demand for
more European power extends to many former European colonies. Whilst
American soft power has declined, the rise of China has led to a
resurgence in support for American power in Asia. Increasing Russian
influence in Eastern Europe is paralleled by a demand for a greater
American role. Outside Europe, "the west" is still seen to some extent
as a single actor: countries suspicious of American power tend also to
be against EU power. In the run-up to the Iraq war, Mary Robinson called
global public opinion the "second superpower." She may have exaggerated
its ability to sway the decision to invade Iraq, but she was right to
point to its importance as a source of legitimacy in world politics.
Even in the many places where citizens cannot vote in free and fair
elections, governments constantly poll the public to understand their
aspirations and pre-empt them. Their findings can have an impact on
decisions about war and peace and can even affect the positions they
defend in institutions such as the United Nations and World Trade
Organization. more...
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
| NewWorldOrder |
Is America's Sovereignty Obsolete?
HumanEvents.com (October 22, 2007) -
When Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said, “Americans have lost trust in
their government” at the Values Voters’ gathering in Washington, DC,
there was more than a wee bit of irony in his words. McCain elaborated
on the theme yesterday on “Fox News Sunday,” saying the distrust comes
from corruption in Washington, frustration at the Iraq war, incompetence
in the Katrina relief and from failure to deal with illegal immigration.
The irony is in the confluence of the two McCains: recognition that part
of the distrust of government arises from a failure -- now six years
after 9-11 -- to secure our borders from incursion by illegal aliens.
McCain’s realization is not shared by President Bush whose press
secretaries -- first Tony Snow and now Dana Perino -- have said that he
is still convinced he was right in the failed “comprehensive” approach
to illegal immigration which translated into amnesty for illegal aliens
and would not have secured our borders. It is no exaggeration to say
that a nation which does not secure its borders cannot claim
sovereignty. Sovereignty -- the supremacy of political power a nation
has over its own actions -- seems to mean a great deal less to free
world leaders than to their Chinese, Russian and Islamist counterparts.
It is important to frame the issue just that way because among the free
nations, especially in Europe, sovereignty is eroding and unfree nations
guard their sovereignty with paranoid fervor. The leaders of too many
free nations -- including President Bush -- appear to be in competition
to give away their nations’ sovereignty by placing more and more
authority in supranational organizations like the UN and the European
Union which are not accountable to voters. This week will feature “UN
Day” and we’ll again be lectured about international law and how we owe
the world -- which means the UN -- respect for the ‘laws’ it adopts.
Under the UN charter, which we signed sixty years ago, resolutions of
the UN Security Council have the force of international “law.” But what
does that mean? Judge Robert Bork memorably wrote in “Coercing Virtue”:
International law is not law but
politics. For that reason, it is dangerous to give the name “law,”
which summons up respect, to political struggles that are
essentially lawless. The problem is not merely the anti-Americanism
that grips foreign elites and shapes law; it is also the American
intellectual class, which is largely hostile to the United States
and uses international law to attack the morality of its own
government and society.
To foreign elites and our “intellectual class”, American sovereignty
is passé: a concept that has outlived its time that should be limited at
every opportunity by international “law” in the form of treaties and
decisions of the Security Council and UN-created courts. American
sovereignty is based on our Constitution. There is no provision in the
Constitution for US law to be made by the UN or any of the “courts” it
creates. George W. Bush may go down in the history books incorrectly as
a “unilateralist” president for taking action in Iraq, but his legacy --
most of which is still undecided -- may be just the opposite. George
Bush waited six months, from September 2002 to March 2003 -- in military
terms, nearly an eternity -- for the UN to act before he threw
the most-telegraphed punch in American military history.
Conservatives were properly critical when Supreme Court Justices Anthony
Kennedy and then-Justice Sandra Day O’Connor referenced European law in
deciding a case arising under our Constitution. The idea of injecting
foreign or “international” law created by any body other than our
Congress -- limited by the Constitutional checks and balances of the
Congress and the Executive -- is in contradiction to our sovereignty.
But as Andy McCarthy
wrote here last week, President Bush took a position against Texas’
right to decide its own law in death penalty cases in favor of a treaty
from which he had previously withdrawn the United States and which was
probably unconstitutional. The president’s whittling away at American
sovereignty continues. As
Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex) and
Chris Horner say elsewhere on our pages today, the UN Law of the Sea
Treaty -- rejected long ago by President Reagan -- now awaits Senate
ratification because President Bush chose to submit it for that
purpose. LOST would establish a tax on deep-seabed mining payable to
the UN and controls over America’s economy by regulating pollution that
affects the seas. These powers are to be vested in an international
court that is unaccountable to US voters and not bound by - and thus
violate - the Constitution. European leaders have now decided on a new
version of the European Union “constitution” that is essentially the
same as the version rejected by French and Dutch voters two years ago.
They plan to make it effective without submitting it to the voters
again. Britain has no constitution to protect its citizens so even
there, where no vote has ever been taken, the Brown government plans to
surrender its sovereignty and adopt the EU “treaty,” binding England to
the product of the European elites. Europe may be beyond saving, but
America is not. We shall, by dint of the work of Sen. Cornyn and
like-minded conservatives, survive President Bush’s erosion of America’s
political power to decide our own policies and, ultimately, our fate.
Who comes after Mr. Bush may continue the erosion or end it and repair
the damage. We know Hillary Clinton will do what Kerry promised not to.
In her article in “Foreign Affairs” last week (about which more shall
appear here), she hinted that she would seek ratification of the Kyoto
“Global Warming” treaty, saying we need a, “…binding global climate
agreement.” She also called for strengthening and reliance on the whole
internationalist alphabet soup of bureaucracies including the
International Labor Organization and the World Trade Organization. Will
any of the Republicans do better? Mitt Romney last week declared the UN
a failure. But how will he -- or any of his competitors -- stop the
erosion of our sovereignty and restore it to what the Founding Fathers
designed?
more...
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
| NewWorldOrder |
America
|
I've been putting off presenting this
information I've learned because it disturbs me greatly and I'm very
wary of the group vehemently dividing our nation, but I can't
explain away what I've learned. If we are truly as near to the end
as the
HIStory, Our Future Bible studies seem to point, then
this makes perfect sense and fits into that timeline. I would
recommend that study first as a foundation to what this gets into.
If you would rather not know anything that will destroy your current
perception, do not visit the link. If you do, read and watch
everything before deciding anything. Honestly examine what is
presented as it is presented and remember
Romans 12:19-21.
In my hesitancy, I've called it
Beating around the Bush's Please remember that Yeshua told us
to watch and share the Gospel, not get involved in politics of the
world. We cannot change what is about to unfold as it was foretold
in scripture to glorify God. Our escape is through Yeshua Ha
Mashiach, Jesus the Messiah. So rather than be ruled by anger and
vengeance, share His selfless love and let God do the avenging for
the wickedness of the world. We are not of this world but we are the
salt and light of it.
Proverbs 18:13 He
that answers a matter before he hears it, it is folly and shame unto him.
EU Vows To
Shape Globalisation EU
Observer (October 22, 2007)
- Having finally put six
years of institutional wrangling behind it with last week's
agreement on a new treaty, the 27-nation EU says it is now
confident to face outside challenges. In December, EU leaders
are expected to adopt a declaration, which should underline the
bloc's change of priorities – moving from institutional matters
towards issues such as globalisation and climate change. "We
have agreed that we should rule out further institutional change
for years ahead", UK prime minister Gordon Brown said on Friday
(19 October) – something he said he personally hoped would be
the case for at least a decade. The union now has less than two
months to agree a list of new priorities linked to globalisation
and subsequently move on to agreeing the best political recipe
for how to deal with the phenomenon. According to the
European Commission, the EU should avoid being a passive
spectator, but rather "shape" globalisation. In
practice, it is promoting the so-called principle of reciprocity
- meaning trading partners should open their markets as
much as the EU does. "We should be open, but not naive.
We should not close our doors, rather we should encourage others
to open theirs", commission president Jose Manuel Barroso said,
suggesting that openness is a two-way street and that third
countries should offer comparable levels of openness to EU
exporters and investors. In addition, foreign companies
wishing to do business in EU territory should not be allowed to
by-pass the rules applied in the union's internal market. Speaking
at the EU summit Friday (19 October), French president Nicolas
Sarkozy proved to be the strongest advocate of such a principle.
"Let's not be naive, we must demand a reciprocity",
he said, complaining about the severe environmental and social
requirements placed upon EU businesses, but not followed by
their non-European competitors. "We have to remind others there
are rights as well as obligations", Mr Sarkozy added, singling
out Russia and China. |
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
NewWorldOrder |
According to scripture,
Daniel 9:26,27,
the antichrist is the future prince of those who destroyed
Jerusalem in 70AD, the Romans. We now have a reviving of the
Roman Empire as described in the symbology of Bible prophecy. To
learn more about this,
click here. Europe is
going to be the center of the global government that the
antichrist will control. That structure is currently in
existence and is working to control the world. Already the US is
beginning to give over sovereignty by the rule of law and
placing our nation under the dictates of outside governments.
This will continue more and more until America becomes part of
this global governance. Don't think that's possible? Many things
will change very quickly and the world will not remain the way
it is today. Already the control by finances is well under way
and indeed our "Federal Reserve" is actually owned by private
bankers, many from outside the US. For more on this,
click here to see some
videos on this topic.
EU Strikes Deal on Treaty, Ending Political Stalemate Bloomberg
(October 19, 2007) - European Union leaders
struck a deal on a new governing treaty, ending two years of
soul-searching over how to equip the bloc to tackle 21st-century
scourges such as climate change and terrorism. The new treaty,
if ratified by 2009, would create the post
of full-time president, strengthen the EU's crime-fighting powers,
enhance the role of the democratically elected European Parliament and
streamline a clunky decision-making system. ``We're coming out
of this summit stronger, so we can take on world challenges,''
Portuguese Prime Minister Jose Socrates said in Lisbon early today after
late-night concessions to Poland and Italy sewed up the agreement. The
next step is ratification by all EU governments, a hurdle that has
doomed EU treaties in the past. Ireland, which voted down the EU's
current treaty in 2001 only to back it a year later, will hold a
referendum and pressure is mounting on U.K. Prime Minister Gordon Brown
to call a popular vote that polls show he is certain to lose. ``We hope
we vote `yes' but we'll wait and see what the outcome is,'' Irish
Foreign Minister Dermot Ahern said on BBC Radio 4 today. Failed
referendums in France and the Netherlands killed off a planned EU
constitution in 2005, stirring concerns that the bloc was out of touch
with its citizens. The new treaty, dubbed the Reform Treaty, will be
signed Dec. 13 in Lisbon.
U.K. Referendum
Brown held firm against calls for a U.K. referendum, with a YouGov poll
for the Daily Telegraph showing 69 percent of British people calling for
a vote. Seeking to whisk the new rulebook through the House of Commons
and avoid a U.K. referendum, Brown spoke of an ``amending treaty'' that
doesn't cross over ``red lines'' drawn in defense of Britain's
sovereignty. ``We need the amending treaty because it's designed to make
an institution of 27 members work better, but also because the British
national interest is being protected,'' Brown said at a pre-summit press
conference. Denmark, which triggered a currency crisis in 1992 by
vetoing the Maastricht Treaty, will decide in December whether to put
the Reform Treaty -- also to be known as the Treaty of Lisbon -- to a
popular vote. France and the Netherlands, haunted by the constitution
referendums that led to the EU's institutional standstill, plan
parliamentary ratification for the Reform Treaty.
Complex Voting
Now with 27 member countries and a probable 28th, Croatia, waiting in
the wings, the EU is straining under a decision- making system
originally designed for six countries in 1958. The Reform Treaty would
replace complex voting mathematics with a ``double majority'' formula
enabling laws to pass with the support of 55 percent of the governments
representing 65 percent of the EU's population. European Commission
President Jose Barroso said the overhaul makes it easier for the EU to
live up to global ambitions such as taking the lead in combating climate
change and modernizing the economy to deal with competition from China,
India and Russia. ``We have a treaty that will give us now the capacity
to act,'' Barroso said. ``Our citizens want results. They want to see in
concrete terms what Europe brings them.'' Today's accord hinged on
last-ditch bargaining with Poland, which has complained of being treated
as a second-class power since joining the EU as its largest ex-communist
state in 2004.
Polish Elections
With his party trailing in polls before elections on Oct. 21, Polish
President Lech Kaczynski won the legally binding right for small groups
of countries to delay EU decisions on which they are narrowly outvoted.
On that technical yet politically symbolic point, the EU upgraded the
delay clause from a non-binding declaration to a law that can't be
changed without Poland's consent. ``We got everything we wanted today,''
Kaczynski said. Italy also scored a late victory, winning an extra seat
in the European Parliament that puts it on par with Britain, at 73 seats
apiece. The leaders put off a final accord on parliamentary seats until
their December summit. ``We are now in a situation that recognizes
Italy's role in Europe,'' Italian Prime Minister Romano Prodi said.
``This is the end of a very long period of difficulty in European
history. The EU can start again to operate in a concrete way.''
`Red Lines'
The 18 countries that ratified the constitution battled to save as much
of that document as possible. Daniel Gros, director of the Centre for
European Policy Studies in Brussels, said ``the substance of the Reform
Treaty is 90 percent that of the constitution.'' While the new treaty
strips out the constitution's references to the EU's two-decade-old flag
and anthem, the public won't notice the difference. EU and national
institutions will still fly the flag of 12 gold stars on a blue
background, and Beethoven's Ninth Symphony remains the official hymn.
Like the constitution, the treaty creates the post of EU president with
a 2 1/2-year term, shrinks the Brussels-based European Commission,
enhances the power of the European and national parliaments,
strengthens the EU's foreign policy representative
[Javier
Solana] and does away with national vetoes over
terrorism, crime fighting and illegal immigration. Britain traced
its thickest red line over internal security questions, winning the
right to ``opt out'' of EU decisions on policing and criminal justice.
Britain and Poland also opted out of the bloc's Charter of Fundamental
Rights, fearing it would create rights not enshrined in national law.
Merkel
The bulk of the treaty was mapped out at an all-night summit in
Brussels in June, chaired by German Chancellor Angela Merkel. As the
first woman and first eastern German to run Europe's biggest country,
Merkel earned plaudits as a crisis manager. In the final talks over the
fine print, Merkel chose not to fight for wording changes that the
European Central Bank said would bolster its independence. German
officials dismissed concerns that the treaty would erode the ECB's legal
foundations by listing it along with EU institutions such as the
European Court of Justice. The bank's powers, set out in the Maastricht
Treaty, remain unchanged.
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Ahmadinejad: Iran Calls For Effective, Comprehensive Ties With Russia
Islamic Republic News
Agency
(October 11, 2007) -
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on Thursday that the Islamic Republic
of Iran is not to set any limit for expansion of ties with Russia and
seeks a durable, effective and all-out ties with that country. "Iran's
authority would be to the benefit of Russia and vise versa," he said.
Ahmadinejad made the remarks in an interview with Russian news agency
Itar Tass and Russian TV network on Thursday. Given their geographical,
political, and cultural status, the two nations are to live together,
underlined the president. Iran and Russia are naturally united, he said.
Despite many ups and downs in two sides' relations in the past, the two
countries are determined to fully bolster and broaden their mutual
relations, he said. Mutual cooperation between Iran and Russia would
leave positive impacts on the region as well as the whole world, he
pointed out. The two sides enjoy ample economic potentials to meet each
other's requirements, he said. Expansion of mutual cooperation between
Iran and Russia would be to the benefit of both nations, regional
countries and the world, he said. Both Iran and Russia as two big powers
playing significant role in regional and global equations, he said. On
his latest trip to New York and his speech at the United Nations General
Assembly, he said the United Nations is an international venue for
exchange of views and expressing ideas and Iran did the same thing which
was welcomed by the whole world. All countries in the world including
Russia put the seal of approval on Iran's viewpoints about freedom and
justice seeking, he said. "Another positive result of the trip to New
York was that strong barrier of censorship in that country broke and the
American nation directly listened to our real points of view on various
global issues and welcomed them," he said. Iran's nuclear activities are
within IAEA rules and regulations and have a peaceful nature, he said,
adding that the reports released by the IAEA is a good proof of this
claim that Iran has not deviated from peaceful nuclear activities. Since
a number of western countries believe that they have lost their
interests in Iran they try to put the blame on Iran by raising such
claims as lack of confidence building in nuclear issue, he said.
more...
|
Iran
|
Gog/Magog
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
America
|
'Make peace with us – or we'll kill you!'
World Net Daily
(October 12, 2007) - An open letter
issued by a group of 138 Muslim scholars, clerics and academics issued
an "invitation" to the Vatican, the archbishop of Canterbury and other
Christian leaders to "make peace" with Islam. At least, that is the way
most mainstream news reports styled it – "an invitation to make peace."
It was actually more of an ultimatum than it was an invitation. Boiled
down to its essence, the letter warned Christians to "make peace with us
or we'll kill you." The letter just phrases it more nicely. "As Muslims,
we say to Christians that we are not against them and that Islam is not
against them – so long as they do not wage war against Muslims on
account of their religion, oppress them and drive them out of their
homes." It was hard to know what to make of that statement. If it refers
to the war on terror, it was Osama bin Laden who declared this a war of
religions, in which he identified his enemies as Christian Crusaders and
Jews. The so-called "invitation" to make peace with Islam suggests that
the price of peace is Islamic freedom to make war on others without fear
of retaliation. At no point in the conflict has anyone other than Islam
defined it as a conflict between Christians and Jews against Islam.
The statement was timed to coincide with the end of the
Islamic month of Ramadan and one year after the pope inflamed the
sentiments of the Religion of Perpetual Outrage by quoting the words of
an obscure 14th century Byzantine emperor. The letter was hailed by
Newsweek as "something of a miracle" – treating it as if were an olive
branch being offered by the victim to the aggressor, if only the
aggressor were humane enough to accept it. Gushed Newsweek in it's
column headlined,
"Give Peace a Chance" – as if it were the West who opposed peace and
had suddenly run amok attacking innocent Muslims everywhere – "It is
addressed to Christianity's most powerful leaders, including the pope,
the archbishop of Canterbury and the heads of the Lutheran, Methodist
and Baptist churches, and, in 15 pages laced with quranic and biblical
scriptures, argues that the most fundamental tenets of Islam and
Christianity are identical: love of one (and the same) God, and love of
one's neighbor." I hardly know where to begin
to address that statement. In the first place, if it were true, then no
Muslim could make a credible argument to his co-religionists based on
the most fundamental tenets of Islam that there is any eternal reward to
be had for killing one's enemy in jihad. If it were true, then the word
"jihad" wouldn't be an Islamic concept. There is no identical
fundamental belief within Judaism or Christianity that ascribes special
spiritual benefits to dying in religious combat. In fact, there is no
such concept of "religious combat" of any kind in Christianity or
Judaism. The Bible relates combat involving Jews against their enemies,
but those were territorial political battles, not battles to impose
Judaism on the vanquished. Jews don't particularly encourage converts,
and Christians believe that conversion can only be accomplished by the
Holy Spirit. The job of the Christian is limited to sharing the Gospel,
not imposing it by force or threats. Christians are taught by no less an
authority than the Lord Himself, "And whosoever will not receive you,
when ye go out of that city, shake off the very dust from your feet for
a testimony against them." The Quran tells the faithful that, should an
infidel reject Islam, "you will fight against them until they submit."
And of course, those who continue to reject are to be slaughtered. The
document is peppered with references to the Islamic contention that
Muslims, Christians and Jews all worship the same God, which got rave
reviews from the press. Time magazine enthused, "The letter notes
that 'whilst Islam and Christianity are obviously different religions –
and whilst there is no minimizing some of their formal differences,'
both require believers to believe in only one god, and it's the same
god." Time, in its excitement, is emulating Newsweek's style of making
sweeping theological pronouncements disguised as
news. From their perspective, who can blame them? If you don't believe
in any god at all, what difference does it make? One god is as good as
the next – or as some Americans would say, as offensive as the other.
Islam not only demands that its followers believe that Allah is the same
god as the God of Christians and Jews; it demands that Christians and
Jews agree. Neither Christianity nor Judaism imposes that requirement on
their adherents, although Christians and Jews generally agree that the
God of Israel is also the God of Christianity. Not because one side or
the other demands it, but because both understand from the Bible that
the nature of the God of Israel and the God of Christianity are the
same. The mainstream media embraced the letter as vindication of their
long-held but difficult to believe faith in the existence of a vast,
moderate Islamic majority that follow the kinder, gentler Islam that we
keep hearing about, but for which we see little evidence. That is one
way of interpreting it, if you really squint hard. Unfortunately, there
are verses in the Quran that nobody wants to talk about – probably
because nobody wants to consider the awful implications of their
meaning. The ignorance of our political leaders and the media concerning
Islam's true beliefs is beyond deplorable; it is more in the range of
criminal negligence in time of war. Under Islamic law, before Islam can
make war against the infidel with Allah's blessings, the infidels must
first be offered an opportunity to submit to Islam. Osama bin Laden has
just recently asked the leaders and people of the United States to
embrace Islam. So has Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. All these letters offer the
West the "opportunity" to submit to Allah as being equal to God. They
also warn that, should their offer be rebuffed, "The very survival of
the world is at stake." Islam just finished the feast of Ramadan. Here
is what the Quran says should be the attitude of all Muslims at the end
of this sacred feast season: "So when the sacred months have passed
away, then slay the idolaters [particularly Jews and Christians]
wherever you find them, and take them captives and besiege them and lie
in wait for them in every ambush. …" (Quran, Surah 9.5) The irony of our
leaders' and media's response is mind-boggling. This is not an offer of
peace – it is a prelude to war. In the cold light of day it means, "Make
peace with Islam and Allah, or we'll kill you."
|
Islam
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
RCC
|
America
|
I believe that the current
conflict between the West and Islam was part of a plan to exhaust
the world with conflict and then provide someone to resolve what
they themselves created.
Albert Pike
in 1871 wrote a letter detailing three world wars he said were
necessary to bring about their desired end, the introduction of the
"universal manifestation of the pure
doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view."
Read whole description of the three world wars at the link
above.
The Bible talks about that too
but calls it the
abomination of desolation, when the man of sin declares himself
god in the Holy of Holies and demands that the world worship him or
die. This is the beginning of the
great tribulation and the dragon's war on the saints from
Daniel 7:25 and elsewhere. If you
do a little research on
Islam
and the
12th
Mahdi in light of scripture, I think you will see the
possibility that the 12th Mahdi is the
false prophet of Bible prophecy. He has power to call fire from
heaven, which would be enough of a sign for Islam to follow him and
he is prophesied to direct the world to worship the antichrist. If
indeed the Vatican constitutes the
woman riding the beast, that would bring Catholics that put the
Pope's authority over that of the Bible to worship the antichrist as
well. Think that's not possible? The Vatican is already saying we
all worship the same God, etc. Trust the Bible over man always.
EU will back Abbas if Hamas included
The Jerusalem Post
(October 11, 2007) -
The European Union would support Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud
Abbas if he reconciled with Hamas, according to Christina Gallach,
spokeswoman for EU Foreign Policy Chief Javier Solana. Speaking to
visiting Israeli reporters in Brussels on Thursday, she said the EU,
nonetheless, still held firm to its policy not to recognize Hamas until
it recognizes Israel. Gallach said it was up to Abbas to find a way to
handle Hamas. "What we tell him [Abbas] is that he is the one we
recognize, the one we support," she said. "We work very well with him
and [PA] Prime Minister Salaam Fayad." In the past, Gallach said, the EU
found a way to move forward with Fatah when it sat in a government with
Hamas, dealing solely with Abbas and some of his Fatah ministers. Her
statements came in response to media reports of possible talks between
Hamas and Fatah just one month before the US-sponsored Middle East
meeting expected to be held in Annapolis on the Israeli-Palestinian
peace process. "We tell [Abbas] he has to do what he thinks is right,"
Gallach said. "On this issue, we will not take the lead." Hamas Prime
Minister Ismail Haniyeh said Wednesday night that Hamas would be willing
to hold talks with Fatah and hinted it would consider ceding control of
the Gaza Strip, Al Jazeera reported. "There is a serious improvement in
Palestinian dialogue, and we have agreed to hold talks with Fatah in one
of the Arab capitals," Haniyeh reportedly said. He reportedly said the
Hamas administration in Gaza was "temporary," adding that dialogue with
Fatah would be established following Ramadan. Nabil Amr, a senior Fatah
official and key adviser to Abbas, on Thursday strongly denied reports
about secret talks between his faction and Hamas. He said Fatah would
not talk to Hamas unless the Islamist movement relinquished control over
the Gaza Strip. "Hamas is a terror organization, and any connection of
any type whatsoever to Hamas will not bring peace - not to Israel and
not to the Palestinians," a Foreign Ministry official told The Jerusalem
Post Thursday. Meanwhile, a bipartisan group of former senior US
officials and congressmen pushed for dialogue with Hamas ahead of the
Annapolis peace conference. "We believe that a genuine dialogue with the
organization is far preferable to its isolation; it could be conducted,
for example, by the UN and Quartet Middle East envoys," they wrote in a
letter to the Bush administration published Wednesday. "If Syria or
Hamas are ostracized, prospects that they will play a spoiler role
increase dramatically." The signatories included former George H.W. Bush
administration national security adviser Brent Scowcroft, former Carter
administration national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski and former
Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker. The letter praised the invitation
extended to Syria and called for the conference to launch Israeli-Syrian
talks. more...
|
Israel
|
Islam
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
Solana
|
1st
Seal
|
Dividing the Land
|
Outrage Erupts Over Bush Demands in Murder Case
WorldNet Daily
(October 10, 2007) -
What the U.S. government
wants in the Medellin murder case, now being heard before the U.S.
Supreme Court, is "bizarrely grotesque," according to the chief counsel
for the
Alliance Defense Fund. And
the warning from ADF Chief Counsel
Benjamin Bull notes that the case, being pursued by President Bush
through the Department of Justice, could result in U.S. laws being
subjugated to U.N. resolutions and rules to the point that local police
officers will have to spend more time studying international law than
catching criminals. "The notion that an international body can Mirandize
the right of an illegal immigrant to call a consulate, so that if the
local police trip up and innocently don't to it, a convicted
rapist-torturer-murderer goes free, goes beyond bizarrely grotesque,"
Bull, whose organization has filed an amicus brief on the issue, told
WND. At issue is the death penalty verdict for Jose Medellin, who
confessed in 1993 to participating in the rape and murder of two Houston
teenagers. Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena were sodomized and
strangled with their shoe laces. Medellin then boasted of keeping one
girl's Mickey Mouse watch as a souvenir of the crime. The Bush
administration is before the U.S. Supreme Court seeking to overturn the
death penalty, at the behest of the International Court of Justice, a
division of the United Nations. Medellin and four others were convicted
of capital murder and sent to Texas' death row. A juvenile court
sentenced Medellin's younger brother, who was 14 at the time, to 40
years in prison. But the Bush administration intervention came after the
U.N.'s International Court of Justice found Medellin was not informed of
his right to contact the Mexican Consulate for legal assistance. That,
according to the Hague, was a violation of a 1963 treaty known as the
Vienna Convention. WND requests for comment on the situation to the
campaigns of three leaders for the GOP nomination for president, Rudy
Giuliani, Mitt Romney and John McCain, as well as several other
"second-tier" candidates, did not generate a response. But Bull said the
potential results are frightening. "This is going to be a watershed
case," he said, "which could bring the U.S. criminal justice system into
a brave new world, subordinated to United Nations regulations and
issuances." He noted the 50 convictions of illegal immigrants that could
be overturned by the ruling, and said many of them would simply go free
despite the assaults and homicides that may have been committed. "Most
of these individuals will never be retried – and that's another level of
concern – because the witnesses aren't available," he said. And even
worse yet, he noted, is the precedent it would set for "activist
presidents." If the case is decided the wrong way, he said, a future
president simply could impose such requirements on the United States
simply by signing a treaty composed by the United Nations. "That should
scare the pants off Americans," he said. "What this would do if decided
wrongly would be to transfer American sovereignty to instruments of the
United Nations, essentially putting it under the 3rd World governments
who form a majority of the governments at the United Nations," he said.
"Our worst nightmare as Americans who love our country will happen," he
said. He said he expects the outcome of the case ultimately will turn on
the vote of Justice Anthony Kennedy, because the liberal and
conservative blocs on the court largely have coalesced in previous
decisions. more...
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
| NewWorldOrder |
America
|
In two words, "global
governance." And the world will give their power to the beast
because none can make war with him. They have slowly given all their
rights and freedoms over to a man who comes in with flattery to
deceive and take the freedom of others to later exert his control on
them through changing the laws and the times.
Daniel 7:25
And he shall speak great words against the most High,
and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to
change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand
until a time and times and the dividing of time.
Which brings me to an update,
the
Treaty of Lisbon. This is the beginning of the coming legal war
on the saints. How much control does Europe apparently already have?
And what will happen when America's economy collapses and Europe has
to bail us out financially, will there be any option but obedience
or fighting, but they're expecting and prepared for both. That is
why we must pray and forgive, loving our enemies for vengeance is
the Lord's, He will repay justly.
Israel says peace conference not enough
Associated Press
(October 7, 2007) -
Israel's prime minister said Sunday the U.S.-sponsored Mideast
conference next month is not a substitute for direct Israeli-Palestinian
peace talks, an apparent attempt to lower expectations from the
gathering called by President Bush. However, violence threatened to
overshadow preparations. On Sunday, Gaza militants fired a Katyusha
rocket at southern Israel. No one was hurt, but it raised the dire
possibility of an escalation in the daily battles with Israeli forces if
the militants use more of the rockets, which are far more dangerous than
the homemade versions they have been using. Lebanese Hezbollah
guerrillas bombarded northern Israel with nearly 4,000 of the rockets in
their monthlong war with Israel in 2006, killing dozens of Israelis.
Palestinians were scaling back their demands before the conference,
improving chances for an agreement with Israel on an advance document.
Prime Minister Ehud Olmert told his Cabinet on Sunday that his meetings
with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas have yielded no breakthroughs.
"There have been no agreements or deals," Olmert said. The two have been
sitting down every two weeks or so, and last week they appointed
committees to draft an accord to take to the Mideast conference,
expected to convene in late November in the U.S. The teams are set to
meet for the first time on Monday, and Secretary of State Condoleezza
Rice is to return to the region later this week to assess progress.
While the international conference is designed to promote peacemaking,
"it will in no way replace direct negotiations with the Palestinians,"
Olmert said. He also said there could be no actual movement toward peace
until the Palestinians implement their commitments under the 2003 "road
map" plan. That includes dismantling violent groups like Hamas, which
has in the meantime taken over Gaza and is threatening Abbas' rival
Fatah faction in the West Bank. Palestinians charge Israel has not done
its part under the road map — halting settlement expansion and removing
illegal outposts. Palestinian government spokesman Nabil Abu Rdeneh said
Sunday Israeli intentions are the key. "If they are serious, we will
definitely reach a political document that handles the final status
issues with a timetable for the implementation and the establishment of
the independent Palestinian state," he said. But other Palestinian
officials said a detailed agreement is no longer a condition for
attending the conference — a document that lists the issues but does not
spell out Palestinian concessions would be acceptable. The officials
spoke on condition of anonymity because negotiations are still in
progress. Israel prefers a vague declaration of principles instead of a
detailed document including its concessions. The outline of a final
Israel-Palestinian peace deal has been clear for years — an Israeli
withdrawal from most of the West Bank, removal of most Jewish
settlements there, and deals over Palestinian refugees and division of
Jerusalem. The main problem is the perception on each side that the
other is too weak to make the necessary concessions to finalize such an
agreement. more...
|
Israel
|
Islam
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
Solana
|
1st
Seal
|
Dividing the Land
|
America
|
Is this the signal of America's
end in bringing about peace in the Middle East? I wonder who will
step in to solve this who has the understanding and ability to work
some politics and get a Palestinian State in place? If what is
happening that seems to be fulfilling prophecy is correct, that
leader will be with Europe, the revived Roman Empire. He will lead
10 kings and speak for them because they will have given him their
power. In the name of peace, Jerusalem will be divided and half the
city will go into captivity while the other half remains.
Zechariah 14:1,2 The day appears to
be approaching and we are not in darkness regarding the times we are
living in. Keep watching!
EU treaty talks leave
several political loose ends EU
Observer (October 3, 2007) -
Although the legal experts have given their blessing to the EU's new
draft treaty, there are plenty of political issues that may have to
be dealt with by EU leaders when they meet later this month to sign
off the document. Topping the list is Poland's request to have a
decision-blocking mechanism written into the treaty. Other member
states fear this will make using the mechanism the norm rather than
the exception and are battling to keep it in a declaration, which
has no legal value. Poland is "almost certain" to raise it at the
summit, says one diplomat but notes Portugal - holding the current
EU presidency - is working behind the scenes to get a deal with the
Poles. "They are unlikely to come to the summit without some sort of
solution," said the diplomat who indicated that the Polish request
for an extra advocate general at the European Court of Justice may
be a bargaining chip. The legal experts refused to deal with the
matter, saying it was a purely political question, and that when a
solution had been found they would turn it into legal text. Under
the treaty rules the post - going under the laborious name of High
Representative for Common Foreign and Security Policy - is supposed
to kick into place as soon as the document is ratified in all member
states. The current timetable says this should be done by the
beginning of 2009. This has already got people noting that the
foreign minister could technically be in place before the European
elections take place (mid 2009) and the new commission is in place
(late 2009). This raises all sorts of questions about a reshuffle in
the current commission - the foreign minister will also be a
vice-president of the institution - and who the person is likely to
be and how he or she will be chosen. Leaders of the political groups
in the European Parliament at a meeting with commission chief Jose
Manuel Barroso on Tuesday (2 October) questioned him on their role
in choosing the foreign minister, with MEPs wanting to have as
strong a say as possible. more... |
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Solana |
Will the 12th Imam cause war with Iran?
YNet News (September
28, 2007) - Not since
the prime minister of the tiny Caribbean island of Grenada presented an
address claiming that UFOs posed a mortal threat to the future of
mankind has the United Nations been treated to such a bizarre spectacle.
Many people believe the greatest threat to world peace concerns Iran's
nuclear programme, so there was understandably great interest at this
week's general assembly in New York when the country's president,
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, took the platform. But instead of seeking to
reassure delegates that Iran's nuclear intentions were purely benign, Mr
Ahmadinejad took advantage of his official visit to a country deemed –
in the lexicon of the Iranian Revolution – "the Great Satan" to embark
on a discourse about the wonders of the 12th Imam. For those
unacquainted with the more obscure tenets of Islamic theology, the 12th
Imam is held by devout Shi'ite Muslims to be a direct descendant of the
Prophet Mohammed who went into "occlusion" in the ninth century at the
age of five and hasn't been seen since. The Hidden Imam, as he is also
known by his followers, will only return after a period of cosmic chaos,
war and bloodshed – what Christians call the Apocalypse – and then lead
the world into an era of universal peace. Rumours abound of Mr.
Ahmadinejad's devotion to the 12th Imam, and last year it was reported
that he had persuaded his cabinet to sign a "contract" pledging
themselves to work for his return. For many of the hundreds of delegates
who attended Mr. Ahmadinejad's speech to the UN this week, his discourse
on the merits of the 12th Imam finally brought home the reality of the
danger his regime poses to world peace. more...
|
Iran
|
Islam
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
Need of the Hour Fulfilled
Prophecy (September 27, 2007) -
You know the old saying, "The devil is in the details"? It
couldn't be more true of the United Nations gathering taking place right
now. For two weeks each year, world leaders swoop on the U.N.
headquarters in New York, where they're given a platform to address
their concerns. Media has aired sound bytes from their speeches --
mostly juicy ones about Iran's president -- yet much of the real news is
happening on the sidelines, out of the spotlight. Yesterday, for
example, the Alliance of Civilizations Group of Friends held its second
ministerial meeting, attended by U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and
U.N. General Assembly President Srgjan Kerim. The presence of the U.N's
top two leaders shows that this meeting was not viewed by them as
peripheral. Quite the contrary, in
his remarks to the Group of
Friends, Ban called the AoC's task of healing the divide between Muslim
and Western societies "the need of the hour." Ban went on to say that
the AoC "can help reinforce the work of the United Nations system." For
those who don't know what the AoC is -- let's just say it's "the U.N.
meets religion." The U.N. realized it can't achieve world peace without
getting religious people onboard -- those who are the source of so much
conflict. So, in 2005, it launched this initiative -- co-sponsored by
the prime ministers of Spain and Turkey -- which "hopes to contribute to
a coalescing global movement" against religious extremism, according to
its
Web site. Unfortunately for
Christians, it labels as "extremists" all those who claim sole ownership
to the truth -- not just terrorists. (Learn
how it may play into the
end-times false religious system in league with the Antichrist.) During
his speech yesterday, Sampaio enlisted the help of the Group of Friends
-- made up of representatives from governments and multilateral
organizations -- in fulfilling his vision for the AoC, as outlined in
the "Implementation
Plan 2007-2009." But, first,
Sampaio pointed out how many nations have joined the Group of Friends
since late April, from about 40 to over 70. See the list
here. This means the AoC now
has weight to throw around. Or, in Sampaio's words, "our ever-enlargening
Group of Friends has now reached the critical mass of participation."
Read his speech
here. He said it's time to
turn the AoC's momentum into concrete action in the form of commitments
from governments. He urged the Group of Friends to go back to their
countries and seek suggestions for projects and policies that can be
implemented nationally, regionally and locally -- targeting the AoC's
four areas of focus: education, youth, migration and media. According to
the Implementation Plan, such projects should include programs to train
journalists, major-motion films, AoC youth groups, advertisements at
cultural and sporting events, and new curriculum on religion for
schoolchildren. As Sampaio said yesterday, the AoC is much more than
conferences and lectures: It "needs to be integrated in the domestic
agendas of the countries, in the international agenda and indeed in all
aspects of the work of the United Nations." In other words, the AoC is
planning some big stuff. If the Implementation Plan is, indeed,
implemented, then schools around the world may soon be required to use
AoC-approved curriculum. Yes, even religious schools (don't believe me,
read the Implementation Plan). Do you want your kids being taught that
all religions are equally valid -- that Jesus was wrong and he isn't the
only way? Of course, this excludes, for now, the United States, which
hasn't yet joined the Group of Friends. But, oh, the difference one
election can make! The participating government's suggestions will be
presented at the AoC's first annual forum, Jan. 15-16, in Madrid Spain.
Sampaio urged them to view this event as a golden opportunity for the
AoC to go public. You think Hollywood's got a liberal agenda, wait until
film directors catch the AoC vision. And don't forget the very real
possibility of Super Bowls sponsored by the Alliance of Civilizations. The
good thing is then the media will have to report on it.
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom | RCC
| NewWorldOrder |
America |
Apostasy |
Holy See's
speech addresses a 'serene
dialogue of civilizations'
Bush
to U.N.: Lay Off Israel
Israel National News (September
25, 2007) - United States President George W. Bush urged the
United Nations to reform its Human Rights Council Tuesday, criticizing
the body for ignoring abuses in places like Iran "while focusing its
criticism excessively on Israel.” "The American people are disappointed
by the failures of the Human Rights Council," Bush said. "The United
Nations must reform its own Human Rights Council." In the course of his
speech, Bush pointed out several regimes which he termed "brutal" and
"cruel." He announced new sanctions against the military dictatorship in
Myanmar (Burma), accusing it of imposing "a 19-year reign of fear" that
denies the basic freedoms of speech, assembly and worship. "Americans
are outraged by the situation in Burma," the president said in an
address to the U.N. General Assembly. He purposely used the country's
old name, Burma: the military junta renamed the Asian country Myanmar
but the U.S. refuses to recognize the change. "Basic freedoms of speech,
assembly and worship are severely restricted," he said. "Ethnic
minorities are persecuted. Forced child labor, human trafficking and
rape are common. The regime is holding more than a thousand political
prisoners, including Aung San Suu Kyi, whose party was elected
overwhelmingly by the Burmese people in 1990. "The ruling junta remains
unyielding, yet the people's desire for freedom is unmistakable," Bush
said. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad sat in the chamber and
checked his watch during Bush's remarks. First Lady Laura Bush, also
present for the president's speech, walked by the seated Iranian
president without making contact, and Israeli Ambassador Danny Gillerman,
too, made a point of avoiding Ahmadinejad. Bush urged the world's
nations to support countries that are struggling for democracy.
more...
|
Iran
|
Israel
|
Islam
|EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
America
|
Solana
calls for more substance in Israeli-Palestinian talks EU
Business (September 24, 2007) - "The
issues that are fundamental have been stated already many, many times,"
Solana said as the members of the quartet -- the United States, European
Union, United Nations and Russia -- began two hours of talks. "We have
to go beyond the mere stating of the issues and try to put some more
meat on every issue," he said. "Water, borders, security, Jerusalem,
refugees -- those are the fundamental issues that have to be resolved at
the end of the day," he said, adding: "We can not afford a failure."
"Without any doubt, it would be going back several years. We cannot
afford that to happen," he added. more...
|
Israel |
Islam |
Dividing the Land | EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Solana |
1st
Seal |
France Steps Up European Milspace Push Aviation
Week (September 24, 2007) -
Europe is signaling a growing willingness to develop new military
space capabilities and more closely integrate them. But moving
toward a unified milspace will require high-level political support
that remains elusive, government and industry executives say. French
officials have been rallying Europe to put more joint effort into
milspace. And while more nations are jumping on the bandwagon,
cooperation has been largely ad hoc and with little concern for
broader integration. “We now need to go further,” argues Rear Adm.
Phillipe Arnauld, the top French space officer, who noted that the
assumption of the European Union presidency by France in July 2008
could provide a key impetus to forge an integrated European milspace
program at last. But a clear consensus doesn’t exist, and funding in
France, which would have to underpin any major project, has been
decreasing. One of the most promising signals of progress is that
the European Space Agency is ready to participate in
military-related endeavors, which officials signaled at a conference
here last week organized by the French Aeronautics and Astronautics
Assn. ESA representatives said a dual-use space situational
awareness system will be proposed soon (see p. 34). Space awareness
could provide a test case for Europe to make breakthroughs on
information sharing, believes Patrick Chatard-Moulin, a staff
official for the EU High Representative for the Common Foreign and
Security Policy. The mission has gained increased attention in
Europe after China’s anti-satellite test this year. A senior ESA
official says that the consequences are evident daily; half the
near-misses of spacecraft by debris in a recent week were linked to
parts left over from the ASAT test. more...
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom | NewWorldOrder |
UN to open regional "support office" in Baghdad The
Jerusalem Post (September 23, 2007)
- UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon on Saturday voiced continued concerns
about security in Iraq even as he announced plans to open a regional
support office in Baghdad,
part of the UN's efforts to expand its presence in the war-torn country.
"Security is still a problem," Ban said, as Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki sat beside him in a joint news conference in which
the Iraqi premier stressed that gains realized on the security front.
The two were speaking after a meeting that grouped top diplomats
representing many of Iraq's neighbors, the United States, donor nations
and other groups. Ban emphasized his hope that "more would be done" on
the security front and said the U.N. would build its presence on the
ground as the situation improved. The UN has maintained a reduced
presence in Iraq since after an August 19, 2003, bombing at its Baghdad headquarters
that killed 22 people. But Ban stressed that there was clear agreement
in the meeting that the international community cannot turn away from
Iraq. "Its stability is our common concern."
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Javier Solana's "New International Order"
Fulfilled
Prophecy (September 22, 2007) -
Wow. I'm sitting here in near
disbelief after having read an article written by Javier Solana for the
Summer/Autumn 2007 issue of the journal
Social Europe.
The article is a state of the union address -- for the European Union,
that is -- with the long title, "Where We Stand: From Building Peace in
Europe to Being a Peace-Builder in the World -- Taking Stock of the
Union's Foreign and Security Policy."
Read it here. It was
just brought to my attention by an FP reader. Only five pages long, it's
a must-read for students of end-times prophecy. It reveals Solana's
global agenda -- one that appears to have a lot in common with the
agenda of the Antichrist. In his article, Solana -- High Representative
for the EU's Common Foreign and Security Policy and secretary general
for both the Council of the European Union and the Western European
Union -- argues that since the European Union has been so effective at
bringing peace and stability to Europe, it now needs to bring peace and
stability to the world. He says the model the European Union has used --
one based on common laws and strong institutions, not armies -- needs
to be replicated in a "new international order." Solana says:
"As new powers emerge and new
issues call for our engagement, Europe will have to apply itself to
the task of promoting the emergence of a new international order. An
international order which is based on clear rules and strong
institutions."
Yes, you read that right. Solana's
calling for the European Union to spearhead a new international
order, based on foreign policy he's crafted. It's not the first time
he's admitted to having a global agenda, but it's one of his most
direct statements on it. What intrigues me is Solana's repeated
references in the article to the need for international rules and
laws to make "global governance" a reality. He says:
"Therefore, one key task for
Europe for the next 50 years is to protect and develop a system of
strong institutions able to tackle the problems of a new age; and to
build a rules-based international order with the rules that will
help us navigate the choppy waters ahead."
Speaking again of law, Solana says:
"Above all, we need to re-learn
that the biggest shift in history came when we extended the rule of
law. First within states and now, gradually, also among them. This
gradual extension of the international rule of law has provided
enormous benefits: taming the passion of the states but also
providing a legal framework to guide many aspects of human
inter-actions at a global level."
The legal
framework for a global order would include stepping up both the
World Trade Organization's dispute settlement system and the
International Criminal Court, according to Solana. Solana's focus on
law intrigues me because, in the book of Daniel, we learn that the
Antichrist "will intend to make alterations in times and in law" (Daniel
7:25). When I recently asked one of
my former theology professors -- who is also a lawyer and friend
whom I respect -- what he thought is the meaning of this passage, he
said something to the effect of, "Well, sure. Law is the first thing
that has to be changed to bring about major change to a society."
So, Solana realizes that a new international order needs new laws to
govern it or, in his words, new laws to "organize our globalised
world." Could this be the meaning of that obscure Daniel passage?
Solana also stresses the necessity of the EU Member States' common
foreign policy. He says:
"It means we can act together to
address a range of different issues that concern us. Our unity, our
influence and our action benefits us, of course. But it also serves
many others. And, actually, it is often easier for us to act
together than alone. Solidarity and shared political objectives are
good force generators, and our collective weight counts."
This interests
me because the book of Revelation tells us that 10 kings will share
a "common purpose" with the Antichrist and help him execute it (Revelation
17:17). Similarly, Solana is asking
for the help of the EU Member States -- which include the 10-nation
Western European Union military alliance -- to extend his foreign
policy globally. A new international order will require other
things, too -- more EU structure, staff and "sharpened crisis
management performance" (a.k.a., police and military forces),
according to Solana. He points out that the EU already has
"sophisticated" crisis management forces that, in the past year,
have conducted 10 operations across three continents, including
military, police and rule-of-law missions. One of these missions
provides the only open border crossing point in Gaza. And the EU is
about to send out its largest force ever -- to Kosovo to enforce
peace and the rule of law there. Of the EU's crisis management
operations, Solana says:
"The global reach and scope of
these different operations is striking. ... And their impact is
significant. From Aceh to Rafah, and from Kinshasa to Sarajevo, the
EU is providing the 'key enablers' for peace and stability."
A new international order will also
require the representation of more countries in international
governing bodies, like an enlarged G-8 and UN Security Council, as
well as stronger regional organizations, like the African Union and
the ASEAN, according to Solana. And a new international order will
require more "bargaining," he says. Concessions must be made when it
comes to the environment and climate change and -- this is very
interesting -- when it comes to "forms of dialogues between
cultures." This sounds like Alliance of Civilizations language to
me. If so, then it seems Solana may be referring to concessions
being made between religions, which -- according to the Alliance of
Civilizations -- would include giving up exclusivistic claims like
"There is only one path to God." This is a bargain Jesus' followers
can't buy. Solana ends his article with a quote he's used before --
borrowed from Jean Jacques Rousseau in his The Social Contract --
which Solana applies to his own vision of a "global social
contract." The quote goes:
"The strongest is never strong
enough to be always the master, unless he transforms strength into
right and obedience into duty."
In other words,
a global government will only work when citizens dutifully obey
leaders, according to Solana. And they'll willingly want to obey
leaders who make right decisions. Yet, students of end-times
prophecy know that the final world government will be
unrighteousness and demand obedience. It's amazing Solana has such a
powerful position from which he can construct a new international
order. Yet, most people still don't know who this guy is. (If you
don't know about him and his powerful office, learn more
here.)
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Solana |
1st
Seal |
WND banned from secret meeting on selling U.S. assets
World Net
Daily (September 19, 2007) -
EuroMoney PLC, the UK-based
company that arranges dozens of financial conferences around the world
each year, has refused to allow WND staff reporter Jerome Corsi to
attend next week's "North American PPP (Public-Private Partnership) &
Infrastructure Finance Conference" in New York, even though WND offered
to pay the $1,999 conference fee required to attend. "When government
officials want to go behind closed doors with investment bankers and
lawyers to discuss selling our public infrastructure to foreign
investment leaders, investigative reporters need to be there to tell the
public what is really going on," Corsi said. "Why is it that all these
PPP and
SPP
(Security and Prosperity Partnership) meetings are behind closed
doors," Corsi asked, "and government officials and their supporters
think that's normal? But when investigative reporters want to attend and
report on what is being said, we are the ones who get accused of being
the conspiracy theorists?"
"By refusing to allow WND to attend as a paying
customer," Corsi argued, "EuroMoney is telling the American public that
they intend to conduct a secret meeting designed to teach government
officials how to sell out U.S. public infrastructure to foreign
investment concerns. "I'm sure we will all be told that EuroMoney
seminars and PPP structures are really for our 'security and
prosperity,' just as President Bush asserts for the SPP itself," Corsi
continued. "Evidently we are just supposed to close our eyes and trust
government officials, investment bankers and international lawyers,
putting aside national security concerns and other economic issues which
we believe may be of concern to our readers." According to the
conference brochure, the purpose of the EuroMoney seminar is to teach
state and local government officials in the U.S. how to lease a wide
range of public assets to international and foreign private investment
groups. "Your online news service is known for its political rather than
business content," EuroMoney's Joanna Johnson explained yesterday to WND
in an e-mail, while refusing to allow Corsi permission to attend the
conference. "We don't feel it's appropriate for a business conference."
In an Aug. 29 e-mail, Johnson told WND the seminar was "only open to
those who are internal to EuroMoney or those with whom we have a media
partnership. In this instance I am unable to extend a press pass to your
organization." WND then offered to pay the full registration fee for
Corsi, the author of
"The Late, Great USA" which uses government documents to
outline plans for a continental merger, to
attend. In response, Johnson sent a second Aug. 29 e-mail asking WND for
payment details and confirming Corsi could attend, provided WND paid the
full registration fee as offered. Yesterday's e-mail shutting the door
to Corsi came after WND pressed EuroMoney to send an invoice. "So,
EuroMoney made a political decision to keep me out of their private
meeting," Corsi commented, "but WND is the one EuroMoney objects to as
being too political. Seems to me like a case of guilty conscience where
EuroMoney is accusing WND of a fault EuroMoney knows itself to be
committing." Public-private partnerships, or PPPs, were authorized by
Executive Order No. 12803 President George H.W. Bush signed April
30, 1992, clearing federal barriers for cities and states to lease
public works infrastructures to private investors.
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
| NewWorldOrder |
America
|
Euro Could Replace U.S. Dollar As Favored Reserve Currency
Associated
Press (September 17, 2007) - Former
U.S. Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan said it is possible that
the euro could replace the U.S. dollar as the reserve currency of
choice. According to an advance copy of an interview to be published in
Thursday's edition of the German magazine Stern, Greenspan said that the
dollar is still slightly ahead in its use as a reserve currency, but
added that "it doesn't have all that much of an advantage" anymore. The
euro has been soaring against the U.S. currency in recent weeks, hitting
all-time high of $1.3927 last week as the dollar has fallen on turbulent
market conditions stemming from the ongoing U.S. subprime crisis. The
Fed meets this week and is expected to lower its benchmark interest rate
from the current 5.25 percent. Greenspan said that at the end of 2006,
some 25 percent of all currency reserves held by central banks were held
in euros, compared to 66 percent for the U.S. dollar. In terms of being
used as a payment for cross-border transactions, the euro is trailing
the dollar only slightly with 39 percent to 43 percent. Greenspan said
the European Central Bank has become "a serious factor in the global
economy." He said the increased usage of the euro as a reserve currency
has led to a lowering of interest rates in the euro zone, which has
"without any doubt contributed to the current economic growth."
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
| NewWorldOrder |
America
|
Very, very dangerous -- Excuse for EU to unite and come
after USA?
Constance Cumbey (September 13, 2007)
- USA to begin crafting Iran Bombing Plan?
Breaking News: Looks like Solana's NGO cheering
section in the form of Worldwatch Institute is getting in on his
power boosting act.
Read about that here.
It has now called for the EU to pressure the USA on climate change.
Maybe we should have Lester Brown and his World Watch Institute
register as the foreign agents they evidently are!
A frightening headline on a
Fox news
story ran yesterday. It indicated:
1. Germany's Angela Merkel
says they will no longer support
increased sanctions against Iran on the nuclear development
issue.
2. Assumption in Washington is that this means they won't care if
USA does something unilaterally to take that threat out.
3. Germany's economic relationship with Iran makes it unfeasible for
them to support sanctions against that oil rich country.
Now, the reality, probabilities, and prophetic
implications:
1. Germany's
Angela Merkel could not be more closely allied with the EU's foreign
and military policy chief, Javier Solana.
2.
Europe is already bitter at the USA for the 2003 Iraq invasion.
Also click here for more
documentation.
3. European Union countries have been
handing Solana the immense powers
they have to EQUALIZE
themselves with the USA.
4. A prophesied God given role of whoever the prophesied "10 kings"
handed their power to was to equalize themselves with another power
"and thus fulfill the words of this prophecy." See Rev. 17.
5. If Germany can't afford to antagonize Iran with sanctions, how
much less can it afford to antagonize Iran by tacitly sanctioning
war?
6. Germany's agenda during its recently closed EU presidency was to
boost Javier Solana's powers --
it made tremendous progress on crafting a treaty that would give him
the powers he sought in the constitution. It has placed (with
the help of EU allies inside England) Solana in a much stronger
position than he was prior to that German presidency.
7. Javier Solana's Brookings Institution speech of March 21, 2007
said that
global disarmament and non-proliferation were "imperative" to him.
He also said it was "imperative" that the
new global governance machinery be ready by 2009.
8. This new public hint that the USA is considering imprudent
bombing operations against Iran might be exactly what Javier Solana
needs to give European countries "the crisis that equals
opportunity" rationale to put him over the top with the powers he
needs
to consolidate
the 2 million scattered separate European country
armies, their navies, their weaponry, etc.
valued at over $200 billion USD
per EU sources.
9. The NATO weaponry is sitting in Europe with
more
European control than USA control, thanks in no small part to
Javier Solana's splitting of the commands between Brussels and
Norfolk during his NATO tenure between 1995 and 1999.
10. There are clear Biblical prophecies about a great Babylon being
destroyed by fire and the ships at sea bewailing her burning? Could
that be the USA the prophets were seeing? "In one hour is thy
destruction come?"
11. The threat of the USA bombing a necessary oil and economic
resource for European countries such as Iran could very well give
credence to the increasing demands that
"Europe speak with one voice."
12. Very clearly, Javier Solana is and has been the "face and voice
of Europe."
13. Never forget
what
created Javier Solana's job and what
he proposed to increase his powers.
I am writing this in shock and on the fly. I must go
to my office for an appointment. I will add hyperlinks to this story and
amplify it later. We indeed live in serious times and I fear for my
country. Stay tuned!
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
Solana
|
NewWorldOrder |
America
|
I highlighted in red the date
that Javier Solana believes it imperative to have the global
governance machinery in place by, 2009, because of the conclusions
arrived at in the
HIStory, Our Future Bible studies placing the abomination
of desolation in February of 2009! This was discovered thanks to the
diligent research of those noted in the study before I got the
confirming evidence of Herb L. Peter's research. Before then, I
didn't know much about European politics or how much it is
fulfilling Bible prophecy. This is just another confirming piece to
the puzzle. Remember that God has not left those watching in
darkness that we should be caught like a thief! His Word is being
fulfilled today!
Pro-Europeans launch
fight back against calls for treaty referendum Independent.co.uk (September
12, 2007) - Pro-Europeans are launching a fightback today against
growing demands for a referendum on the new European Union treaty. The
Coalition for the Reform Treaty will argue that the treaty is in
Britain's interests as well as the EU's because it will lead to more
efficient, effective and democratic decision-making. The long-awaited
response by pro-European businessmen and politicians comes after the
campaign in favour of a referendum gathered momentum during the summer.
Roland Rudd, chairman of Business for New Europe, said: "We have heard a
lot of negative things about the treaty. Many are scare- stories or
based on inaccuracies. We took the initiative to form this coalition to
make a more positive case." The new network aims to co-ordinate
pro-European activity, rebut Eurosceptics' arguments and lobby for the
treaty when it is debated in Parliament. Business bosses joining the
coalition in a personal capacity include Sir Philip Hampton,
(Sainsbury), Niall FitzGerald (Reuters), Sir Michael Bishop (BMI),
Phillipe Varin (Corus), Roger Carr (Centrica), Sir Martin Sorrell (WPP)
and Sir Mike Rake (KPMG ). The campaign begins as the European
Commission formally ended its long fight to persuade Britain to abandon
the mile and the pint in favour of the kilometre and litre. EU industry
commissioner Gunter Verheugen said it was a "pointless battle".
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Solana: ‘Israel has our solidarity in fighting terrorism’ European
Jewish Press (September 4, 2007)
- Javier Solana, the European Union’s foreign policy chief,
condemned Monday the Qassam rocket attack from Gaza on a
kindergarten school in the Israeli southern city of Sderot.
Speaking at a
press conference after meeting Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni
in Jerusalem, Solana, who is on a new Middle East trip, declared: "I
would like to offer my solidarity to the people of Sderot and I
condemn the rocket attack on a school today". “I was there with the
minister not long ago and we were welcomed together there, and I
know what it means. And to see Sderot again today - once again,
seeing the same spirit of the people of Sderot, particularly the
kids in the schools. I think that this is something that I have to
condemn,” he added. Asked about EU support for Israeli operations in
Gaza to stop the rockets, Solana, whose official title is EU High
Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP),
said: "Israel has our solidarity in fighting terrorism. We have
continued to search for efficient measures against terrorism.
Sometimes we do not agree 100% on exactly how to combat it but we
offer our full solidarity with Israel in it’s efforts to fight
terroris. Israel knows that you have it.” Solana’s trip is aimed at
preparing the EU for an intensive period of activity in the coming
months and at restarting the peace process. He pointed to the
meeting of the ad hoc liaison committee and the Quartet meeting
during the UN General Assembly week later this month in New York and
the international conference to take place in the late autumn
probably in Washington. This conference was called for by US
President George Bush as part of efforts to jumpstart the dormant
peace process in the wake of the takeover of Gaza by Hamas in
mid-June. Solana said: "We don’t know exactly when the conference
will take place but it must be a success. We can not allow it to
fail and we must therefore define success". The EU would help and
cooperate as much as possible in the preparations of the event, he
added. more... |
Israel |
Islam |
America |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
Solana |
1st
Seal |
Solana beating US conference drum Associated
Press (September 4, 2007) -
European Union Foreign Policy chief
Javier Solana has arrived in Egypt for talks with the Egyptian
officials on Middle East peace process. Solana will hold talks with
the Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Abul-Gheit and the Arab League
Chief Amr Moussa, according to DPA. Solana's multi-leg tour of the
Middle East takes place ahead of a major US-sponsored international
conference on Middle Peace which is scheduled to be held in
Washington this autumn. The main discussions between the EU's top
diplomat and the Egyptian officials are expected to be held on
Wednesday. During the two-day visit Solana will make efforts to
bring the Palestinians and Israelis back to the negotiating table.
Solana held similar talks in Amman on Monday. So far, Solana's
statements had signaled hope. During his Sunday's visit to the West
Bank city of Ramallah, Solana predicted that the coming months
would witness a series of important forums in which the peace
process will be discussed. He had also said that that the Middle
East Quartet, which comprises the United States, Russia, the EU and
the United Nations, will meet with members of the Arab League in
December. One obvious flaw in the much-ballyhooed US sponsored
conference is that it has consciously failed to allow Hamas to
attend. The militant group has consistently refused to recognize
Israel and in the January 2006 elections soundly trounced
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas' Fatah party
throughout the occupied territories.
|
Israel |
Islam |
America |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
Solana |
1st
Seal |
European Neighbourhood Policy Conference Euroean
Commission (September 3, 2007)
- The European Neighbourhood Policy is a partnership
between the EU and its neighbours in support of our partners’ reform
processes. This Conference provides a first opportunity for governmental
and non-governmental actors, from both partner countries and EU Member
States, to exchange views and ideas on how the policy can be further
strengthened or how it could better respond to their needs. Discussion
in the morning Ministerial-level session will focus on issues where
cooperation can be accelerated. In the afternoon, debates will also be
opened to non-governmental stakeholders from civil society, business
groupings and academics. Commissioner Ferrero-Waldner said: “This is
a partnership of equals and it is essential that we listen carefully to
the interests of our neighbours… We would like to hear our neighbours’
views onwhere they would like to see the greatest emphasis in our
relations, where they see their interests reflected, and where, perhaps,
they still feel that there are gaps to be filled… This conference will
underline the EU's determination to develop individual and
differentiated partnership that reflects the interest of each neighbour.”
more...
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Solana hopes for developments in Mideast peace process YNet
News (September 2, 2007)
- Following meeting with
Palestinian president in Ramallah, EU foreign policy chief says, 'We
have to take advantage of the opportunity created.' Abbas stresses that
'there will be no dialogue with Hamas until it goes back on the coup it
carried out in June'. It is time for the
Palestinian people to reap the fruits of security and peace, EU foreign
policy chief Javier Solana said Sunday following his meeting with
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in Ramallah. In a press conference
held after the meeting, Solana said he hoped for positive developments
in the coming months. According to the foreign policy chief, he came to
the Middle East to advance the peace process. He stressed that the
Europe Union would continue to help Abbas and his government with
financial and security aid. "We need to see achievements by the end of
the year. We have to take advantage of the opportunity created," he
added. Solana noted that the negotiations between
Israel and the Palestinians would be
backed by the EU and expressed his hope that the talks would succeed and
that each side would be open to the other side's suggestions. Addressing
the
US-sponsored peace conference scheduled
to take place in November, the foreign policy chief said that "a
solution will not be achieved tomorrow, but we have to make progress."
The Palestinian president said that his
meetings with
Prime Minister Ehud Olmert dealt with
all the relevant issues, both daily issued and disputed diplomatic
issues. "Every such meeting requires a lot of preparation, so that it is
not defined as a failure," he said.
more...
|
Israel |
Islam |
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Solana |
1st
Seal |
Will Presidential
Decision Directive #25 be Declassified?
Daniel
New
(August
2007) - What happened? On October 10, 1995, the 1/15
Battalion of the 3rd infantry Division of the U.S. Army came to
attention at 0900 in Schweinfurt, Germany. All but one of the 550
soldiers were wearing a sky-blue baseball-style cap with a United
Nations insignia on the front. One was wearing the olive-drab flat cap
that is authorized to be worn with the Battle Dress Uniform. With this
simple act of disobeying a direct order, Spc. 4 Michael New set the
stage for a legal battle that has profound implications for the future
of American soldiers into service of the United Nations without the
constitutional permission of Congress.
On 24 July, attorneys for Michael New sent a letter to
the Office of Information Programs and Services, a division of the State
Department, requesting a "Mandatory Declassification Review" of
Presidential Decision Directive #25. Most of our readers will recognize
that as the document which President Slick Willie Clinton authorized
himself to ignore the Constitution, ignore Congress, ignore
long-standing statutory law, and to send US troops into military
settings under the authority of the United Nations, without
Congressional participation in any way. We only recently learned that
this agency exists. We also learned that any citizen may request a
review of any classified document, and if that document is over ten
years old, a mandatory review of it is triggered by the request. PDD#25
is now 13 years old. What are the implications?
- The implications for Michael New are tremendous.
The Pentagon and the White House based their prosecution upon the
basis of the order given to deploy to Macedonia under a General from
Finland. By refusing to allow a soldier access to the legal basis of
that order to deploy, New had no defense. The original court-martial
refused Spc. New permission to introduce any evidence in his own
defense! If we can read PDD#25, we may well find the legal basis for
demanding that the court-martial be overturned.
- The implications for our troops in uniform today
are also tremendous. If, for example, it is found that the
Constitution has been violated, (which we believe has happened),
then the entire question of placing American soldiers under foreign
commanders in undeclared wars may well find its way to a courtroom -
and we may well assist that in happening!
- The implications for restoring the Constitutional
balance of power between Congress and the White House, and
restricting both with that very document to which each and every one
of them has taken an oath, are also great.
- The implications of the US relationship to all
international agencies will suddenly be subject to a sharp review
by, of all things, the Constitution of the United States! What a
novel concept.
In short, this review could well be the point at which
imperial presidents are brought up short on a tether known as
Constitutional Law. Regional Alliances seem to be the "wave of the
future" - but the way we have been involved in them (since 1946) just
happens to be contrary to the U.S. Constitution. Not content with the
pace of Globalism, Bill Clinton and Al Gore decided to "reinvent
government" - in what was nothing less than a coup d'etat against the
Constitution! You may have thought that the case of Michael New vs.
United States Army was over and done with. I know we did. But, you asked
to be kept informed of any developments in Michael's case, and this one,
while a simple request for information, may turn out to be huge. We'll
let you know. The coming book, to be entitled, Legions of Empire, by
William Norman Grigg and Daniel New, is coming along (slowly). Any
person wanting to get a copy of the first edition, hardback,
autographed, needs to send us $50 along with a request to reserve a copy
in their name. That first printing will consist of 500 hardback copies
and 3,000 paperbacks. The first 100 will be numbered and autographed. If
we get all 100 pre-subscribed, it will mean we can pay for most of the
raw printing costs of the entire run. That's not everything, but it's a
running start! It is incumbent upon you to study, first that you may
understand the nature of the threats coming against our country, and
second that you might educate your children and the next generation, for
the Struggle for Liberty is not an event - it's a lifestyle.
more info
| EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
| NewWorldOrder |
America |
Solana to meet Israeli and Palestinian leaders European
Jewish Press (August 31, 2007) - EU’s
foreign policy chief Javier Solana will travel to Israel and the Palestinian
Territories over the weekend as part of the European Union’s desire to play an
important role in the Quartet of international Middle East mediators,
his spokeswoman, Mary Brazier, told
EJP. Solana will have talks with Israeli and Palestinian leaders ahead of
several important gatherings later this year, including the informal meeting of
EU Foreign Ministers on 9 September in Portugal, the Quartet meeting in New York
next month and the international Mideast peace conference to be convened in
November at the initiative of US president George Bush. Solana is to meet on
Sunday in Ramallah with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Prime Minister
Salam Fayyad before meetings in Jerusalem Sunday and Monday with Israeli Prime
Minister Ehud Olmert, Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni, Defence Minister Ehud Barak
and Knesset (Israel’s parliament) Speaker Dalia Itsik. Solana is said to be
“cautiously optimistic” about Israeli-Palestinian peace prospects and
appreciates the current momentum created by the talks between Olmert and Abbas.
He also feels that there is for the first time in seven years a “unique
opportunity” to seize with Bush’s peace conference proposal. His spokesperson
said that there is “no change” in the EU’s policy towards Hamas. “There is no
political contact with Hamas,” Mary Brazier, said. During his visit, Solana will
also meet the heads of the EU border assistance mission at the Rafah crossing
point (EU BAM Rafah) and of the EU Police Mission in the Palestinian territories
(EUPOL COPPS) which is helping the Palestinian Authority to establish a modern
and effective civil police service and develop security capacity.
more... |
Israel |
Islam |
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Solana |
1st Seal |
Exclusive: European Union officials hold secret talks with Hamas The
Jerusalem Post (August 29, 2007)
- EU security officials have been conducting secret talks with Hamas
leaders in the Gaza Strip over the past few weeks, Palestinian
Authority officials told The Jerusalem Post on Tuesday. The
PA officials did not reveal the identity of the visitors, except to
say that they belonged to three EU intelligence services. The
Europeans are said to have met with top Hamas leader Mahmoud Zahar,
as well as Ahmed Yusef, political adviser to Prime Minister Ismail
Haniyeh. Sources close to Hamas confirmed that EU officials had
visited the Gaza Strip recently for talks focusing on security-related issues.
According to the sources, the Hamas leaders urged the EU
representatives to work to end the boycott of the Hamas government
in the Gaza Strip,
and to pressure Israel to reopen the Rafah border crossing between
Gaza and Egypt. "We hope these talks will be the first step toward
ending the boycott of Hamas, which came to power in a free and
democratic election," the sources told the Post. "There is
growing awareness among the Europeans of the fact that Hamas can't
be ignored as a major player in the Palestinian arena." In response,
Christina Gallach, spokeswoman for EU Foreign Policy chief Javier
Solana, told The Jerusalem Post that she was unaware of any
such meetings. On a separate note, she said that Solana was due to
visit the region this weekend and would be in Jerusalem, Ramallah
and Jordan. Israeli government officials contacted about this matter
Tuesday night said they knew of no EU contacts with Hamas. One
government official reiterated that Israel‚s position was that
"Hamas should not be dealt with and should be kept as far away form
the game as possible." The official added that Hamas was a terrorist
organization "that continues to do whatever it can to impede any
chance for progress." This is the first time Hamas has confirmed
that its representatives have held secret talks with EU security
officials. The Hamas representatives reportedly stressed during the
talks that they were not interested in a major confrontation with
Israel. Both Zahar and Yusef denied assertions that Hamas was
planning a wave of terrorist attacks in the West Bank to undermine
PA Chairman Mamoud Abbas's status ahead of November's Middle East
peace conference. Meanwhile, Abbas has asked Sudan to use its good
offices with Hamas to resolve the crisis in the PA. A senior Fatah
delegation headed by Azzam al-Ahmed, who is close to Abbas, held
talks in Khartoum on Tuesday with Sudanese government officials on
ways of ending the Fatah-Hamas dispute. The Fatah delegation
emphasized that Abbas and Fatah were keen on resuming "national
dialogue" with the Islamist group.
|
Islam |
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Solana |
1st
Seal |
Ban Ki-Moon calls for peace World
News Network (August 31, 2007)
- The time has come, says the UN Secretary-General.
Ban Ki-Moon Pledges UN Support to End Israeli Occupation Of
Palestinian Land. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon has
called for a just and lasting solution to the conflict in Palestine.
Addressing the UN International conference Of Civil Society In
support of Israeli-Palestinian Peace in Brussels, Belgium he said,
the gathering reflects the deep and enduring desire of people across
the world for a comprehensive, just and lasting resolution to the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Such a settlement is also one of the
foremost priorities of the United Nations. The continued occupation
of the Palestinian territory prolongs hardship and injustice for
millions of Palestinians, yet it has also failed to ensure the
security of Israeli civilians. The Secretary general said he was
encouraged by recent international and regional efforts to get the
Palestinians and the Israelis back on the negotiating track. The
Arab Peace Initiative, Tony Blair’s appointment as the Quartet
Representative, and President Bush’s decision to convene a Middle
East Peace meeting all have the potential to result in a significant
breakthrough. He said, “Amidst this activity, I particularly welcome
the decision by Prime Minister Olmert and President Abbas to meet
regularly to discuss a range of issues. I hope that the internal
challenges each faces will not deter them from moving forward with
discussions on the political horizon.” The Secretary General added,
“Of course, movement on the political front cannot obscure the dire
humanitarian situation on the ground. The unsustainable division of
the West Bank and Gaza Strip has grave humanitarian and political
implications. Conditions in the Gaza Strip have become particularly
acute; they demand the urgent reopening of border crossings for
commercial and humanitarian deliveries. To alleviate this crisis,
UNRWA and other UN Agencies are doing everything they can to support
the affected populations. Their efforts, however, cannot compensate
for the effect of the closed crossings. Today, I again encourage
both parties to demonstrate a true commitment to peace through a
negotiated two-State solution. Israel should cease settlement
activity and the construction of the barrier, ease Palestinian
movement and implement the Agreement on Movement and Access.
Palestinians, for their part, need to make every effort to end
violence by militant groups and make progress on building robust
institutions. The United Nations will continue to support
international efforts aimed at bringing an end to the occupation,
and achieving a two-State solution. This work is not easy, but it
would prove close to impossible without the active participation and
support of innumerable civil society groups and individuals in
Israel, in the occupied Palestinian territory, and around the world.
Civil society actors are helping build bridges between the Israeli
and Palestinian peoples. They are strengthening institutions and
providing critical humanitarian and other assistance. In every
aspect of their work, they are contributing towards a just solution
to this decades-old conflict. Working together, we can achieve our
goal: a comprehensive, just and lasting settlement, based on
Security Council resolutions 242, 338, 1397, 1515 and the principle
of land for peace. |
Israel |
Islam |
Dividing the Land |
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom | 1st
Seal |
It
is clear who is on Israel's side and who is not. In the face of
historical fact, for the first time in history a nation is being
forced to give up land won in a war a generation ago. Indeed all
the nations of the earth are gathered against Israel to divide
the land God portioned for her, and woe to the nations who
interfere with God's design! We have been warned in the Bible
regarding this and it has even been pointed out in
Eye To Eye: Facing the Consequences of Dividing Israel
by
Bill Koenig.
Solanaman Fulfilled
Prophecy (August 24, 2007) - A
breakthrough may have been reached with Iran's nuclear program,
according to reports from the
Islamic Republic News Agency and the
Associated Press. During two days of talks in Tehran on Monday
and Tuesday, representatives from Iran and the International Atomic
Energy Agency (the UN's nuclear watchdog) reportedly finalized an
agreement that was previously made between Iran's top nuclear
negotiator, Ali Larijani, the IAEA secretary general, Mohamed
ElBaradei, and the EU foreign policy chief, Javier Solana. The
agreement follows on the heels of ongoing negotiations between
Larijani and Solana that Solana called "very constructive."
Read about the talks here. And in March, the Iranian foreign
minister said Larijani's meetings with Solana were helping to
materialize a solution. The agreement reportedly includes a
framework -- a plan and timetable -- for resolving the international
community's concerns over Iran's nuclear program. It comes a month
before the IAEA is scheduled to release a progress report on Iran's
nuclear program. A favorable report would keep new UN sanctions from
being imposed on Iran. Yet, Washington opposes the agreement and
believes new sanctions should be imposed, according to the
Associated Press article. The U.S. fears that the IAEA is giving
into Iran -- and just days after the United States labeled Iran's
Revolutionary Guard Corps a terrorist organization.
Read about it here. But European nations may see things
differently. This
Asia Times Online article today reports that European nations --
with the exception of the EU3 (France, Germany and Britain) feel
that Iran and the IAEA have reached an acceptable agreement. The EU3
have sided with the United States -- agreeing that Iran is not
complying with UN demands -- and, with the U.S., these three have
been negotiating with Iran outside of the UN efforts. Yet, their
efforts haven't produced the results Solana's have, causing the Asia
Times article to ask and then answer its own question: "Why is the
Larijani-Solana duet making progress while other channels are not?
The answer is persuasive diplomacy, for Solana has wisely used quiet
diplomacy and rationality, rather than the rhetoric of Washington
and London." If Solana's negotiations continue to deliver results
with Iran, then it will be interesting to see his diplomatic skills
resulting in yet another successful breakthrough -- one others
thought was impossible. Solana has a long history of such
negotiations, earning him a reputation as a diplomatic superhero.
That's why I call him "Solanaman." The funny thing is, after I
titled this article I found another article my dad had written about
Solana by the same name.
Read it here. I guess I really rubbed off on my dad. (Ha ha! ...
I can tease my him now, and he can't say anything ... at least where
I can hear him!) We're also waiting to see if Solana's
Euro-Mediterranean Partnership for Peace will deliver stability to
the Middle East. Staying tuned!
|
Iran |
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Solana |
1st
Seal |
The Militarization of the Alliance of Civilizations
Richard Peterson
(August 24, 2007)
- Over the months
that followed the cartoon crisis, I paid very close attention to the
Alliance of Civilizations’ web site. Daily search engine inquiries and
AoC web visits had become routine. July and August yielded more than
enough reading material. One such report, the
OSCE
contribution to the Alliance of Civilizations initiative,
was released in June. The OSCE originated
from the Helsinki Final Act of 1975 (also known as the Helsinki Process)
and changed its official name to the Organization for Security and
Co-operation of Europe in 1994. To this day, the
Helsinki Process
remains active working to implement a one
world government. What I found was that the OSCE had been particularly
impressed with how the EU’s High Representative Javier Solana and the
Alliance of Civilizations had turned the
cartoon crisis into opportunity. Now
they were on board and had written of their unique position to
contribute to the implementation of the AoC initiative. Although I found
aspects of the report somewhat troublesome, it wasn’t until I read the
Alliance’s July 17
Report of
the Hearing with the International Community and Civil Society
that I decided to give the OSCE a second
in-depth look. The International Hearings report contains the following:
“The Military Staff Committee, instead of being abolished, should be
revived so that meetings of military leaders at different levels could
be introduced for the international practice.” (page 26) It appeared
that the defunct Committee was about to be revived! I also read: “On the
national level, constitutional democracy does not entail the existence
of a police state or military watchdog, but implies observation of the
laws that have been worked out by the elected representatives, as well
as the adherence to the value system.” (page 26) This reminded me of a
statement in the OSCE report that I found puzzling. They said that the
OSCE is the world’s largest regional security organization, comprising
of 56 participating states and that “decisions are based on consensus
and are politically but not legally binding”. What did that mean? I
found my answer in the
Helsinki Process Papers--Building Democracy From Manila to Doha: The
Evolution of the Movement of New or Restored Democracies as follows: “Under its human
dimension objectives, the OSCE has adopted instruments, created norms
and initiated activities for the promotion of democracy and governance.
The OSCE instruments are "politically binding commitments" for the
participating states, and become effective upon adoption and
implementable without having to wait for subsequent domestic approval or
ratification. This process allows also the OSCE to react quickly to new
needs.” (page 67) The Barcelona Process, established in 1995, set
among its goals the responsibility of straightening out the clash of
civilizations as well as combating religious fundamentalism worldwide.
The Alliance of Civilizations intends to start operations within the
framework of the Barcelona Process and then amplify the AoC initiative
globally. Next is
NATO and the AoC. NATO is also on board
with the Alliance of Civilizations and, unknown to most Americans, has
split under the
Berlin-Plus Agreement. In the
event of a crisis situation, NATO assets are transferred to the European
Union’s Political and Security Committee presently presided over by EU
High Representative Javier Solana.
Crisis
management drills have already been conducted to test the Berlin-Plus
arrangement. Moving in we have the European Union which has at its
disposal the crisis management
Battle Groups which can simultaneously
sustain multiple offensive operations. These battle groups are intended
for rapid deployment while awaiting reinforcements from member states’
militaries and NATO assets. The
European Security Strategy has
committed to strengthening the United Nations so that it may fulfill its
role in global governance. Anything that undermines global governance is
considered by Solana to be a threat. Statewatch’s report,
Arming
Big Brother,
provides an excellent analysis of the EU’s militarization. The EU is
fully committed to the Alliance of Civilizations as it has appointed the
Anna Lindh Foundation to oversee its implementation. more...
|
Islam
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
Solana
|
NewWorldOrder |
America
|
This is looking to me like
the instrument by which the war on the saints will be carried out.
And what's more, according to the
HIStory, Our Future Bible studies, February 2009 would be
the point of the abomination of desolation.
The Alliance of Civilizations is scheduled to begin in 2009.
Europe, Asia and U.S. inject more cash Associated
Press (August 21, 2007)
- Central banks in Europe, Asia and the U.S. injected more cash into
the markets Tuesday as commercial banks clamored for money. The
European Central Bank placed 275 billion euros ($370.6 billion) in
its normal weekly refinancing as it furthered emergency moves taken
over the last two weeks. That followed a decision by the Bank of
Japan Tuesday to lend another 800 billion yen ($7.01 billion), which
followed a trillion-yen injection ($8.71 billion) the day before.
The U.S. Federal Reserve followed with another $3.75 billion
infusion Tuesday, the latest in a series of cash transfusions that
have topped more than $100 billion since last week. U.S. Treasury
Secretary Henry Paulson insisted the nation will move safely through
credit crisis that has spread from Wall Street to Tokyo, Frankfurt
and other financial centers. The Reserve Bank of Australia lent
banks 4.57 billion Australian dollars ($3.64 billion) Tuesday. The
Bank of England, meanwhile, lent 314 million pounds ($622.3 million)
directly to an institution — the first time it has made an emergency
loan since the start of the subprime crisis and the resulting credit
crunch. The ECB said the 275 billion-euro allotment announced
Tuesday was about 46 billion euros ($61.9 billion) more than it had
estimated, in part because banks that use the euro are still seeking
extra cash. Despite that, Tuesday's cash infusion was significantly
lower than the ECB's tender last week, when it lent 310 billion
euros ($417.7 billion), and also less than the 292.5 billion euros
($393.5 billion) it lent the week before.
more...
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
| NewWorldOrder |
America |
Stop moaning or leave the EU, Britain is told
Telegraph UK
(August 20, 2007) - Elmar Brok,
a centre-Right MEP and close ally of German chancellor Angela
Merkel, effectively told Britain to sign up to the so-called
reforming treaty or consider pulling out of the EU. He insisted that
the new draft was substantially different from the "old"
constitution and that Britain had "got what it wanted" with a series
of opt-outs and "red lines". "Gordon Brown's government has said
there is no justification for a referendum and the UK should stick
to this commitment," said Brok, the European parliament's
representative on inter-governmental negotiations on the treaty. "It
would be very unfair of the UK if, having more or less got what it
wanted in the new treaty, it would then turn round and put this to a
popular vote." Brok, a member of the European convention that
drafted the old constitution, asked: "The UK got its various
opt-outs so what's the problem? How would it seem to other EU member
states if Britain were now to hold a referendum? For me, that would
undermine the negotiations on the treaty and even go as far as to
question Britain's credibility as an EU member. "Britain is a valued
member of the EU but we should perhaps remember that the treaty
contains an article which gives any member state the right to leave
the EU if it so wishes." Those campaigning for a British referendum
were motivated "solely" by their opposition to the EU, he claimed.
Brok, who was chairman of parliament's foreign affairs committee,
said there was "no reason to renegotiate something you agreed on".
He added: "The chapter is closed. "We should be able to have a new
treaty as soon as possible. We have a commitment from all to meet
these requirements." The political veteran said MEPs will resist any
attempt to "water down" the treaty, which aims to revive the
constitution rejected by French and Dutch voters in 2005.
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
European Parliament to Host Anti-Israel Hate-Fest
UN Watch
(August 16, 2007)
- Under the auspices of the UN's Committee
on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People,
a "Conference of Civil Society in Support of Israeli-Palestinian
Peace" will take place on August 30-31 in Belgium. These meetings
are part of a round-robin of anti-Israel gatherings organized
year-round by the UN's 16-member Division
for Palestinian Rights. It all dates back to 1975,
when these mechanisms were installed within the UN on the same day
that the General Assembly adopted its infamous "Zionism is Racism"
resolution. What is new, however, is the venue: the European
Parliament in Brussels. What the conference will pronounce is
pre-determined. Carefully pre-determined: the UN's Palestinian
Division runs a tightly-controlled operation that accredits only
anti-Israel NGOs and speakers. And recently they've become quite
clever. Without altering the virulently anti-Israel nature of their
meetings, the organizers instead seek to mask their
activities — under such innocent-sounding titles as "support for
Israeli-Palestinian peace." Moreover, to add credence to their
cover, they invite specially approved "Israelis" — a select group of
radicals who openly espouse hatred of Israel, claiming the license
to do so because of their citizenship. Both tactics give conference
organizers the cover they need for their allies and enablers to then
use the material. Among the speakers at the conference are Michel
Warschawski, who proudly describes himself as a "well-known
anti-Zionist activist." Others speakers include Nurit
Peled Elhannan, Amira Hass, Raji Sourani, Jamal Jumaa
(Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign), Mohammed Khatib (Popular Committee
of Bilin Coordinator), and David Shearer (OCHA). See the recent
meeting in South Africa, featuring Gideon Levy and
others, to get a sense of what to expect in Brussels. None of the
radical Israeli Jews at the Brussels conference represents even a
tiny segment of the Israeli Jewish population. So it's like holding
a conference on U.S.-Islamic rapprochement and inviting John Walker
Lindh—the American who joined the Taliban—to represent America's
position. Technically, Walker is as American as Warschawski and Hass
are Israeli. But only a scoundrel or a fool would treat either
exercise as anything but a sham. Who was behind the European
Parliament's decision to play host to this poorly disguised
hate-fest? With the conference façade removed, who in Europe will
now have the courage to speak out?
|
Israel
|
Islam
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
'Secret' plan would give Palestinians West Bank
World Net Daily
(August 13, 2007)
- Newly installed Israeli President Shimon Peres has quietly drafted
a plan for the Jewish state to evacuate and transfer to the
Palestinians nearly the entire West Bank and several Arab Israeli
cities located within territory that is undisputedly Israel's
according to the international community, WND has learned. The West
Bank is strategic territory that runs alongside Jerusalem and is
within rocket range of Tel Aviv and Israel's international airport.
It is home to many biblical Jewish communities and some of Judaism's
holiest sites. Peres has presented his initiative to Prime Minister
Ehud Olmert and to top aides for Palestinian Authority President
Mahmoud Abbas the past few weeks, after he took office as Israeli
president last month, diplomatic sources in Jerusalem told WND. The
official role of president here is limited largely to ceremonial
matters; the president does not create foreign policy. Olmert is
mulling over the plan and agrees with much of its contents, the
diplomatic sources said. Peres' plan calls for Israel to hand
97-percent of the West Bank over to Abbas, with Israel retaining a
small number of the territory's Jewish communities. In exchange for
Israel keeping some land, the Jewish state will give the PA control
of Arab Israeli cities north of Tel Aviv which, together with the
evacuated West Bank territory, would amount to the equivalent of 100
percent of the West Bank. Diplomatic sources said aside from Abbas
and Olmert, Peres has presented his plan to European Union
officials. Top EU diplomats in recent days told the media they want
a U.S.-sponsored international conference scheduled for November to
lead to negotiations on a final agreement with the Palestinians.
That international conference and talk from the Bush administration
the past few weeks has led many here to speculate the U.S. will push
in the near future for intense Israeli-Palestinian negotiations
leading to a Palestinian state. With a year and a half left in
office, Bush and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice have been
urging meetings between Abbas and Olmert to establish a framework
for momentum leading to a breakthrough at November's conference.
Olmert and Abbas have been meeting bi-monthly in summits brokered by
the U.S. Already Olmert during the meetings has granted a number of
security concessions to Abbas regarding increased Palestinian
control of the West Bank. The Israeli prime minister
last month amnesty to 178 gunmen from Abbas' Fatah organization
who comprise most of the senior leadership of the Al Aqsa Martyrs
Brigades, the declared military wing of Fatah that is responsible
for every suicide bombing in Israel the past three years. more...
|
Israel
|
Islam
|
Dividing the Land
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
1st
Seal
|
America
|
New EU treaty 'cut and pasted' from old
Telegraph.UK (August 2, 2007) - The official
English text of the new EU treaty shows that it is a "cut and paste
job" from the former European constitution, it was claimed last
night. The official English translation - published while MPs are
away on a 10-week summer break - is 277 pages long. The reference to
a constitution is out. Also cut is "symbolic" legal status for the
EU's 12-star flag, an official motto and the EU's anthem. Other
changes to substance are minor. The title of the EU's "foreign
minister" is changed to High Representative. Provisions drawn word
for word from the old constitution will give him speaking rights
from British and French seats at the UN Security Council. Unlike
Europe's current foreign policy representative, Javier Solana, the
new minister will also be vice-president of the European Commission,
weakening direct control over the post by national governments. Also
lifted almost word for word from the 2004 constitutional treaty is a
new "ratchet clause" making it far easier for the EU to scrap
national vetoes and sidestep referendums. William Hague, the
Conservative foreign affairs spokesman, said: "We can see clearly
what a cut-and-paste job this is from the old EU constitution.
Virtually everything that was in the old EU constitution is in this
treaty."
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
Solana
| NewWorldOrder |
Solana hopeful Iran, IAEA will resolve issues soon Monsters
And Critics (August 1, 2007)
- The European Union's foreign policy chief expressed hope on
Wednesday that Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
would soon resolve all issues relating to Tehran's nuclear programme.
Javier Solana said Iran was now 'trying to work with the agency of
IAEA in Vienna to clarify the outstanding issues that have not been
previously resolved.' 'Once this is done - and I hope this will be
done soon - we will have to resume meetings to see if we can pave
the way to start negotiations,' he told reporters on the sideline of
his meetings with foreign ministers of the Association of South-East
Asian Nations (ASEAN) in the Philippine capital. Solana said he and
Iran's top nuclear negotiator Ali Larijani agreed to see how the
discussions with the IAEA go before they talk again 'to see if the
meeting is appropriate.' Solana arrived late Monday in Manila to
attend the 27-member ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF), the only security
meeting in Asia, on Thursday. On Monday, an IAEA delegation
inspected the heavy-water reactor at Arak in central Iran, according
to Iran state news agency IRNA. Iran's readiness to allow IAEA
inspectors to visit the heavy-water reactor currently under
construction is widely considered a major breakthrough between the
relevant sides in the nuclear dispute. According to a draft
statement, the foreign ministers attending the ARF are expected to
express their 'deep concern' over the May 2007 report of the IAEA
director general that Iran had not suspended its enrichment-related
activities. 'The ministers stressed the urgent need for a diplomatic
solution and a comprehensive arrangement with Iran, while respecting
Iran's right to peaceful nuclear energy under safeguards and in
accordance with its obligations under the Non Proliferation Treaty,'
the draft added. ASEAN groups Brunei, Cambodia, Laos, Indonesia,
Myanmar, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam.
Aside from the 10-member ASEAN, other members of the ARF are
Australia, Bangladesh, Canada, China, the EU, India, Japan,
Mongolia, Papua New Guinea, New Zealand, North and South Korea,
Pakistan, Russia, Sri Lanka and the United States.
|
Iran | EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Solana |
Primor: EU Troops Could Bring Peace to Middle East Deutsche
Welle (August 1, 2007)
- DW-WORLD.DE:
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said last week that he thought a
peace agreement could be reached by the end of 2008. One of the
reasons he gave was because US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice
assured him of it. Is it wishful thinking? Avi Primor: I think Abbas is an optimist because he really
wants this solution. He stands for compromise, he is for freedom, he
is against terrorism. But he has, unfortunately, little power, not
only because Hamas is his opponent and because he has already lost
the Gaza Strip, but also because he has to fight hard in the West
Bank not to lose power to Hamas there as well. But that's not really
the point. The question is what can Condoleezza Rice get started? US
President Bush gave a speech on July 16 in which he laid out a new
peace plan and called for an international conference, to be
attended by Condoleezza Rice, in the autumn. So now the one who has
to actually implement the peace plan is Condoleezza Rice.
DW-WORLD.DE: Will Condoleezza Rice be accepted by
all sides as an acceptable negotiating partner during these talks?
Avi Primor: She will be accepted by everyone,
without a doubt. I have my doubts about whether she will have the
power of the president behind her to actually force a particular
direction -- because this new peace process needs to be forced. I do
not think that the president is serious about this peace plan, but
that he is paying lip service to it to ease pressure from
Condoleezza Rice. So he can say, "Okay, go play a little with the
Israelis and the Palestinians and maybe you can invite a few other
Arab countries to your conference, Saudi Arabia would be ideal, but
I don't expect much of it." I remember that Condoleezza Rice wanted
to support then President of the World Bank James Wolfensohn,
Blair's processor as Middle East envoy, but that she did not have
the support of her president and she failed, just as Mr. Wolfensohn
did. Nothing has changed since then, and I do not think that Bush,
at the end of his term, is really aiming to get something started;
even though he has all the means to do so if he wanted. DW-WORLD.DE: What step has to come next in order to
move toward a realistic peace treaty? Avi Primor: The European Union needs to draft a
peace plan. That's not a problem since all the peace plans are
similar anyhow. But this time it should be an initiative from the
European Union to send robust troops to the Middle East. That
does not have to be exclusively European troops, it could also
include Arab troops, such as from Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan or
Islamic troops like the Turks, and maybe even NATO. They should
take over power in the occupied territories so that Israel can leave
the region. But all of this can only happen if the American do
are not against it. more...
|
Israel |
Islam | EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Solana |
1st
Seal |
Dividing the Land
As the head of the WEU,
the 10 member-state military wing of the European Union, Javier
Solana has emergency powers over the E.U.'s military. If a peace is
going to happen and a great diplomat get the credit for it, things
seem to be falling in order. This peace will also play into the
dividing of the land of Israel, required in order for Islam to even
consider peace. This will probably also result in the dividing of
the
Temple Mount such that the outer court area of the rebuilt
temple will be "left out,"
Revelation 11:1,2, to allow the co-habitation of the Dome of the
Rock and the Jewish temple.
The new European century The
Guardian UK (July 31, 2007)
- The
Project for the New American Century was tested in Iraq and
floundered there. Now it's Europe's turn to make a play for
world power. The American project aspired to US global
leadership and military strength. If Europeans are to have
continued influence in the world, we have to get our aspirations
right. The European Union's methods are set by its ethos and
structure. It
claims to have a good human rights record, even if the
reality lets down the most liberal of members sometimes.
Military action is generally undertaken by member states
individually. Working with its limited tools of trade and aid,
the EU has been trying to increase its influence in the world.
It recently signed
agreements with Morocco providing financial support for
economic and social cooperation. They cover human rights
reforms, market integration, and energy security. The agreements
are part of a larger plan called the
European Neighbourhood Policy. The idea is that neighbouring
non-member countries can enter into closer ties with the EU if
they share its economic and social goals. Europeans who want to
live in a prosperous continent should hope the policy works. It
will ensure North African and Central Asian oil and gas is
accessible through sympathetic countries. They would be useful
allies in fighting against crime, and in ensuring that migration
can be managed to the advantage of both Europe and the migrants.
Europe's mistakes in the past century ensured that its economy
lags behind the US economy. Today, it is Asia which could
further eclipse Europe. Both China and India are likely to reach
Europe economically within a lifetime. We can't stop the
development of China and India. But we can keep Europe
influential in the new world order. Being surrounded by a ring
of economically successful allies will help keep Europeans rich
and powerful. The advantages of close economic links with our
neighbours are so strong that the EU might be tempted to drop
its demands for high standards of human rights in its partners.
Let's face it, the west has been getting its oil from repressive
regimes for decades without domestic collapse. There are signs
that Europe is willing to lower its standards. For example, the
EU has entered into partnership agreements with Tunisia. We have
given the North African state a billion euros in aid since
2002, so you might expect growing attention to human rights from
it. Sadly, no; here's a taste of what Human Rights Watch
says: "The government uses the threat of terrorism and
religious extremism as a pretext to crack down on peaceful
dissent. There are continuous and credible reports of torture
and ill-treatment being used to obtain statements from suspects
in custody. Sentenced prisoners also face deliberate
ill-treatment." I wouldn't want to live in one of the EU's
more repressive partners if we give up on human rights in them.
Maybe if the partners were on the other side of the world, I
would become callous to the suffering of their citizens. The
trouble is, they are our neighbours. Human rights abuses in them
have effects which are usually damaging to our long-term
economic interests. more...
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Solana |
1st
Seal | NewWorldOrder |
The ENP is Solana's baby
and the ticket to get everyone on his peace train. It's more
like bait, offering money in exchange for obedience to EU
ruling. The Bible says that the final kingdom that would rule
the world will rise from the same empire that destroyed
Jerusalem in 70AD, Rome.
Daniel 9:26,27 The
power over this final global governance is going to be handed over
to one man who will declare himself to be God and then the end will
come. Every day brings us closer to the day of the Lord, our
catching away, and the time of God's wrath for the children of
disobedience. The signs have been given, the story foretold, and now
it is up to us who hear and see to share the warning with our
neighbors and bring them to the saving arms of Christ.
EU Treaty published - but only in French
Telegraph.UK (July 27, 2007) - MPs have
accused Brussels and Government ministers of preventing proper
scrutiny of the new European Union treaty by failing to provide
the House of Commons with an English version of the 277-page
text. William Hague accuses the Government of dodging debate
"Corners are being cut" and parliaments across Europe snubbed in
the rush to seal a treaty deal by (October!!), officials have
admitted to The Daily Telegraph. A treaty text was tabled in
Brussels on Monday in one language, French. The Government, and
EU officials organising negotiations, cannot produce an official
English translation of the 145 pages of draft articles, 69 of
protocols and 63 pages of declarations until next month, well
after the Commons has finished for the summer. MPs will return
to duty 10 days before Gordon Brown signs a final treaty
agreement in Lisbon on October 18-19. Rejecting referendum
calls, the Prime Minister will then press for (parliamentary
ratification!!) on a treaty that will have been negotiated over
the summer without proper scrutiny by MPs. William Hague, the
Conservative foreign affairs spokesman, has accused the
Government of dodging democratic debate. "Now that the rejected
EU constitution is back, with a different label, it is clear
that it is being rushed through with the minimum of scrutiny,"
he said. "Gordon Brown wants the British people to know as
little as possible about the major transfer of their own powers
to Brussels this treaty will bring about, but the tactic could
not be more transparent. It simply shows up the undemocratic
nature of the exercise." EU leaders are racing against the clock
to rush through a new "reform treaty" to replace the
constitution rejected by French and Dutch voters in 2005.
Officials close to the organisation of negotiations have
admitted that documents in all the EU's 23 languages are not
expected until December, when a formal ratification text will be
signed by Europe's leaders. "We believe it is a problem but we
have a mandate that is tight. There is urgency. Doing all this
within six months is unprecedented and there are going to be
real limitations to the process," said an official. Normal EU
rules stipulating that documents must at least be in German,
French and English have been suspended. The Conservative MP
Roger Gale has asked for, and been refused, a copy of the new
treaty in English. "The Government obviously does not want MPs,
journalists or the public to have access to the document until
it is a done deal - presumably for fear of the growing demand
for the people to have the right to vote on the issue," he said.
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
Solana
| NewWorldOrder |
High time for Middle East peace: UAE to Blair The
New Zealand Herald (July
26, 2007) - The United Arab Emirates said it
was high time for serious efforts towards Middle East peace as Tony
Blair arrived in the Gulf state on his first visit to the region as
an international envoy. "It is high time to find real mechanism to
achieve peace ... all efforts should be exerted towards just and
comprehensive peace in the Middle East so that the Palestinian
people achieve their legitimate rights," UAE Foreign Minister Sheikh
Abdullah bin Zayed al-Nahayan told Blair. The official WAM news
agency said Sheikh Abdullah also voiced support for Blair's mandate
to revive the stalled peace process between Palestinians and Israel.
The former British prime minister earlier spoke of a "moment of
opportunity" after he met Palestinian and Israeli leaders on Tuesday
but warned that steps towards peace would take time. On the Gulf leg
of his regional tour, Blair is expected to also visit Bahrain. The
UAE, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Jordan form a group set up at an Arab
League summit this year to promote an Arab offer to Israel of normal
relations in return for full withdrawal from lands occupied by the
Jewish state in the 1967 Middle East war. Blair's meetings in the
Gulf coincide with a visit by the foreign ministers of Egypt and
Jordan to Israel to promote the Arab peace proposal, which also
calls for a just settlement for Palestinians displaced by the
creation of Israel in 1948. Blair said earlier on his trip that he
had come to the Middle East to "listen and reflect" and that he
would return for a longer visit in early September. Blair was
appointed this month as envoy for the Quartet of Middle East peace
brokers - the United States, United Nations, European Union and
Russia. |
Israel |
Islam | EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
1st
Seal |
Dividing the Land
The E.U. Deal
News With Views: Constance Cumbey (July
25, 2007) -
On a random internet search, looking
frankly for something else I never found, I just discovered an off
the road lovely little blogspot maintained by one of Javier Solana’s
most obvious London based thinktanks: The Centre for European
Reform. A few years ago,
Herb Peters and I laughed on live radio air at a $10,000 award
two of its foremost analysts, Charles Grant and Steve Everts
received for an essay competition for ideas on how to better manage
“Transatlantic Relations” in its alleged “growing divide.”
Their thoughts:
o Give Javier Solana more
power o Give Javier Solana more money o Give Javier Solana more staff
We joked on the air
over WMUZ radio in Detroit on my then regular program, “Law Talk,”
“Now why didn’t we think of that? We could have had $10,000 to
divide by writing the obviously desired lines of other power elites:
“Give Javier Solana more power, more money, and more staff.” Grant/Everts’ exact
essay wording was “Streamline decision-making and give Javier
Solana more resources.” Quoting from their prize winning essay:
By all accounts, Solana has
been a great success. He has put the EU on the map, in the
Balkans, the Middle East and elsewhere. The time has come to
give him a formal right of initiative. Doing so would put him at
the same level as the Commission and the member-states. It is
clear that EU foreign policy would be more impressive if all
sides worked better together – and if the EU could take
decisions more easily. One way to achieve both these objectives
would be to promote more joint initiatives. The EU should decide
that if the High Representative and the Commissioner for
external relations agreed on a joint proposal, then EU foreign
ministers should accept it if a qualified majority voted in
favor. Because Solana has such excellent links with the
capitals, he would filter out any idea that he knew was too
controversial. Similarly, involving the Commission at an early
stage in the policy process can ensure that its extensive
resources are used to support the EU’s diplomatic strategy. . .
. In any case, Solana needs more resources. The EU needs to
triple the CFSP budget – to the still modest sum of €120
million. EU leaders routinely say they want Europe to assert
itself more strongly on the global stage. But then they balk at
the financial consequences. Clearly, the EU cannot develop a
credible foreign policy ‘on the cheap’. Solana also needs more
people working for him. In the short term this means stationing
more national diplomats in Brussels. In the medium term, the EU
should create its own diplomatic service. EU diplomats should
shuttle between the Brussels,the capitals and the Commission
delegations outside the EU. They should gradually take the lead
in blending national perspectives on international problems.
Developing shared analyses is the best way to ensure that
member-states also agree on the necessary policy responses.”
Co-author Steven
Everts thereafter not surprisingly
left the
CER to take a position on Javier Solana’s cabinet. Charles Grant
stayed behind, also to the benefit of Javier Solana. The CER ideas
were instrumental in shaping notions that would be incorporated in
shaping Javier Solana’s to be all powerful Foreign Minister post in
the failed European Constitutional drive.
Now his compatriot
Charles Grant and company are working hard to shame Great Britain
into accepting the deals made on the new “Treaty” cum constitution
in drag. This is what Grant says are the main features of “the
Treaty”:
- A semi-permanent president
of the Council will replace the 6-monthly rotating presidency.
The various formations of the Council of Ministers will still be
chaired by the rotating presidency.
- The exception is the
Council of Foreign Ministers, which will be chaired by the new
High Representative for EU Foreign and Security Policy (this
post is a merger of those held by the current High
Representative, Javier Solana, and the commissioner for external
relations, Benita Ferrero-Waldner).
- A new double-majority
voting system for the Council of Ministers, under which a
decision is passed when it is backed by 55% of the
members-states, so long as these represent 65% of the EU’s
population.
- The powers of both national
parliaments and the European Parliament in EU law-making will be
strengthened.
- From 2014 onwards, the
Commission will only have 18 members (the seats will rotate
among the 28 EU member-states, with Croatia likely to join
before 2014).
When there was
obviously popular rejection by the peoples of the affected countries
themselves to this acknowledged “democratic deficit” power grab, new
scheming began. That culminated in the recent treaty meetings and
there seems to be an obvious “the people be damned” approach to it.
British elements are trying frantically to force a referendum.
Eurocrats and global elitists are frantically trying to stop one
from happening. Obviously, what is being framed here is much larger
than Europe. Why else would a USA based group hand $10,000 for a
simply worded essay that suggests handing one man, Javier Solana,
such unilateral power and control? In my 26 years of researching the
New Age Movement and 12 years of researching Dr. Javier Solana and
his roles in Middle East processes, NATO, the European Union, and
now “global governance,” I have learned that those advocating all of
the above play a lovely little game of “now you see us, now you
don’t.” Charles Grant, the obvious Javier Solana partisan who stayed
behind at the CER think tank while his writing partner, Steve Everts
went on to be a part of Dr. Solana’s EU cabinet emphatically insists
that Britain
does not need a referendum.
[1]
more...
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
Solana
| NewWorldOrder |
Breakdown Britain The
Washington Times (July
25, 2007) - The release of "Harry Potter and the Deathly
Hallows," the final book in the series, has momentarily diverted the
public's attention from certain realities: The weather, which
normally depresses during winter months when there is less sunlight,
has been crying unmercifully on Britain, bringing what the Daily
Telegraph calls "chaos and misery" as homes are flooded, flights are
canceled or delayed, and train and subway service is disrupted. A
government document obtained by the media reveals Britain has nearly
"run out of troops" to defend the country or fight abroad. The
Conservative Party, under leader David Cameron, failed to win the
first by-election since Gordon Brown assumed the premiership, coming
in third. The Tories appear to have gotten the message not to mimic
the Labor Party. A Tory supplement recently published in the Daily
Telegraph titled "Breakdown Britain: A Guide to Our Broken Society
and How to Fix It" mainly emphasizes those issues — family
breakdown, economic independence, personal responsibility, education
choice — the Tories had downplayed in a failed attempt to
cross-dress as "compassionate conservatives." Nowhere does Britain's
breakdown and loss of direction appear clearer than in the
inconsistent ways the courts treat faith. A nation that has had its
ups and down with religion throughout its long history — and is now
challenged over how to accommodate its growing Muslim population —
appears openly hostile to anything that resembles Christianity and
the dwindling number of churchgoers who still practice that faith.
Three recent legal cases highlight the British establishment's
growing anti-Christian animosity and spiritual confusion. An
employment tribunal ruled that a Church of England bishop, the Right
Rev. Anthony Priddis, discriminated against a homosexual man who
applied for a position as a youth worker when Bishop Priddis
questioned him about his sexual practices and a previous same-sex
relationship. The bishop said he asked the man about his lifestyle
because it "has the potential to impact on the spiritual, moral and
ethical leadership within the diocese." The tribunal ruled the youth
worker position falls outside the religious exemptions allowed in
the country's Employment Equality (Sexual Orientation) Regulations
2003. The British media are full of stories about pedophiles, as
they have been about Catholic priests, who have preyed upon young
boys. In rational times, the sexual behavior of one applying for a
youth worker position might seem a plausible line of questioning,
but these are not rational times. The court is considering what
damages to award the 42-year-old applicant. Another case adding to
the sense of societal breakdown involves 16-year-old Lydia Playfoot.
A court ruled Miss Playfoot's school was within its rights in
prohibiting her from wearing a small "chastity ring" to demonstrate
her commitment to remain a virgin until she marries. The court ruled
the ring is not a "proper manifestation" of her faith. The Playfoot
family must pay $24,699 in court costs for bringing the case against
the school. The girl's father, the Rev. Phil Playfoot, said, "This
country is tolerant of any views except those of Christians."
more... |
Signs of the Times |
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
Apostasy |
EU Ministers Launch Talks Over Treaty Guardian
Unlimited (July
24, 2007) - European Union foreign ministers set mid-October
as the deadline to complete negotiations on the final draft of a
treaty aimed at replacing the aborted EU constitution. The treaty is
meant to streamline the way the 27-nation bloc operates, ensuring
that it can take decisions by majority rather than unanimous voting
and make it easier to set policy. Last-minute confusion had
threatened to scuttle plans for a deal after Poland questioned a
compromise. Poland had vehemently opposed the bloc's new voting
rules - a core element in the treaty - and brought talks to the
brink of collapse in June. Under those rules, Poland will lose
influence and votes compared with other countries. EU officials said
that Fotyga on Monday called for more study of how the EU will make
decisions in the years ahead during the technical negotiations over
the next four months. Portuguese Foreign Minister Luis Amado, whose
country holds the EU presidency, said Fotyga made a "strong
statement'' backing the outline text that was agreed to last month,
adding that EU legal experts would look at Polish concerns. "Whether
there is a need for clarification, we will see to that, we will look
at it at technical level ... that's the process of negotiating a
treaty,'' Amado said. Portugal has set an Oct. 18 deadline for EU
governments to complete and agree to a final draft, making
sure the treaty can be adopted before the European Parliament
elections planned for 2009.
European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso called on EU
governments to "work quickly but carefully'' to get a deal by the
deadline. more... |
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
EU gains strong position in WTO talks DAWN
(July 23, 2007) - EU
trade chief Peter Mandelson said on Monday that the 27-nation bloc
had gained a “strong position” in WTO free-trade talks after new
proposals were made last week to break six-years of deadlock.
“Diplomatically Europe is in a strong position,” Mandelson told EU
foreign ministers, in remarks made available by his office to
journalists. “We are seen as the main champions of this multilateral
process.” “What's interesting, at this stage, is that the EU is one
of the least negatively talked about players, which is unusual,
given how we were being targeted 18 months or so ago,” he said. The
EU has long been criticized in WTO talks for not giving more ground
on agriculture, but WTO negotiators made proposals last week
focusing more on the need for concessions from the United States and
developing countries. The proposals tabled last week aimed at
breathing new life into the Doha Development Round of trade
liberalization negotiations, launched in the Qatari capital in 2001,
and brokering a compromise among the 150 WTO members. The members
are at odds over the extent of new reductions in barriers to trade
in agriculture, industrial goods and services amid cross-cutting
disagreements between rich and poor countries over cuts in import
tariffs and farm subsidies. Mandelson said that Europe should keep
up the pressure on developing countries to cut their tariffs on
industrial goods although he acknowledged they were unlikely to do
so unless Washington cut farm subsidies. “We need to continue to
push hard on industrial tariffs. There is no reason to assume that
the landing point will not move further in our favor,” he said. On
the key stumbling block of agriculture tariffs, Mandelson said the
proposals were “manageable” although they were too demanding on
sensitive farm products. WTO representatives are to meet this week
in negotiating groups in Geneva, Switzerland, to give their initial
reactions to the proposals. After an August recess, the talks are to
resume in early September. |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | NewWorldOrder |
Javier Solana & The Larger Plan
News With Views: Dennis L. Cuddy (July
23, 2007) - In
my July 2 NewsWithViews.com
column, I gave a specific
example of how the power elite’s dialectical process worked (a micro
analysis). In this new article here, I’ll look at the larger picture
(macro analysis) of how a single incident or individual fits into
the power elite’s larger plan. To do this, I’ll refer to Constance
Cumbey’s excellent June 17 NWV
column regarding Javier
Solana, Canada, and other elements. As I’ve mentioned before, one of
the primary power elitists was Cecil Rhodes, whose secret Society of
the Elect was “to take the government of the whole world.” Canadian
P.E. Corbett was a member of this group, and in his Post-War
Worlds (1942) described their plan to form a world government by
linking regional arrangements which would involve trade, investment,
distribution of food and raw materials, migration, etc. After World
War II, Rhodes scholars packed the Canadian external affairs office
of Lester Pearson, who probably had a great deal to do with
President Truman’s firing of U.S. General Douglas MacArthur. This is
because MacArthur had displeased Canada (and Britain) by his efforts
to win the Korean War. Thus, Canada has played an important role in
the power elite’s plans. Constance Cumbey began her article by
stating, “In March of 1995, there was a near shooting war. . .
between Spain and Canada.” She then referred to Solana’s “BIG plans”
involving “mutually advantageous trading terms over the area’s
resources leading to a Mediterranean Free Trade Zone by 2010.” To
accomplish this, the larger plan was to get rid of Yugoslavia’s
Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic, who was standing in the way of
linking the European Union’s trade corridor to the power elite’s
desired Mediterranean regional arrangement because of his conflict
with Croatia and Kosovo. In Washington Post columnist William
Raspberry’s interview of me on the subject on December 18, 1995, he
wrote: “Cuddy says he is tempted more and more to look for economic
explanations for what seems otherwise inexplicable. . . . . Cuddy
notes that the United States is now involved in negotiating a
Transatlantic Free Trade Agreement with Europe.” In early June 1995,
Secretary of State Warren Christopher announced regarding the
Transatlantic Free Trade Area: “We intend to give it the serious
study it deserves, with its considerable potential to form an
element of our overall strategy. . . . The long-term objective is
the integration of the economies of North America and Europe,
consistent with the World Trade Organization.” In Constance Cumbey’s
article, she referred to Solana chairing the “Transatlantic
Alliance,” and in my June 12, 2006 NWV column on “Global
Integration,” I spelled out
the details of the “New Transatlantic Agenda,” not only involving
education (portability of academic credits, etc.) but the Agenda
further stated that “governments too are obliged to adapt their
economic training and social welfare programs.” Constance Cumbey
concluded her article referring to the New Age influence on
Canadians Maurice Strong and former Prime Minister Paul Martin. The
power elite’s larger plan regarding spirituality involves a
synthesis of all religions into “A Common Faith” (the title of
humanist John Dewey’s 1934 book). And prominent Canadians have
played a significant part in the plan. Dorothy MacLean, formerly
with British Intelligence, in the 1990s was president of the New Age
Canadian Lorian Association. The first head of the World Health
Organization (WHO) was Canadian psychiatrist Brock Chisholm (1959
Humanist of the Year), who wrote in Psychiatry (February 1946): “We
have swallowed all manner of poisonous certainties fed us by our
parents, our Sunday and lay school teachers, our politicians, our
priests. . . . the reinterpretation and eventual eradication of the
concept of right and wrong which has been the basis of child
training, the substitution of intelligent and rational thinking for
faith in the certainties of old people, these are the belated
objectives. . . for charting the changes in human behavior.” Just 3
months later, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation on May 5, 1946
aired a speech by Dr. Ewen Cameron, who would in 1953 become
president of the American Psychiatric Association and later receive
CIA funds to conduct horrible LSD and control experiments on people.
In the speech titled “The Building of the Coming World Order,” he
declared: “. . . What we call morals, are simply the customs,
prohibitions and rules which a society maintains at any given time.
. . . What we have once set up, we can set up again, and better. . .
. The United Nations Organization deserves the support of all who
are concerned with the building of a New World Order. . . . There
can be only one education anywhere on earth and that is education
for world citizenship.” Maurice Strong was former U.N.
Secretary-General Kofi Annan’s right-hand man. And long-time U.N.
Assistant Secretary-General Robert Muller has based the curriculum
for his many Robert Muller schools around the world on the
underlying teachings of Luciferian Alice Bailey. Muller and former
Canadian parliament member Douglas Roche in 1995 co-authored a book
advocating a “common security agenda as the basis for a new world
order.” This was after Roche at the World Conference of Religion for
Peace in Louvain, Belgium (August 28-September 3, 1974) delivered a
report titled “We can achieve a New World Order,” thus showing the
power elite’s larger plan to use religion to bring about their New
World Order of a World Socialist Government and One World Religion.
Check out Constance Cumbey's latest article on Javier Solana and the
UN. |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
Solana |
NewWorldOrder |
America |
Is Javier Solana going to speak for EU at UN? News
With Views: Constance Cumbey (July 21,
2007) - If a very recent British
newspaper article is to be believed, Great Britain may soon
surrender its permanent Security Council seat at the UN to the
European Union's Javier Solana. According to
EU Referendum blogspot, Great Britain won't lose their Security
Council seat, nor will France, but the EU will instead have its own
seat. Britain and/or France will have to defer to the EU and remain
silent at the UN Security Council, should an issue arise on which
the EU has taken a "common position."[1]
Which ever version of this is true, it will unquestionably mean a
much greater role for him (or any successor) on the world stage.
Since October 1999, Solana has headed European foreign and military
policy. He also serves as Secretary General of the European Union
Council of Ministers. Also, since November 20, 1999, Solana has
headed the Western European Union, a ten permanent member military
federation. That was to have been a "temporary" one year stint, but
I cynically note that the "year" has lasted a very long time and
that job is still in existence. Solana uses the WEU job for
holding military-industrial confabs that might not be as
non-controversially available to him in other venues.[2]
Since assuming his initial EU governmental roles, his powers have
steadily grown. He now is playing an obviously prominent role in
"global governance" as well.
Quoting from that article as it appears in the British Telegraph
on line today, July 20, 2007: The British government had claimed
that powers for the EU foreign policy supremo, rechristened a High
Representative, have been reduced and his UN role stripped from the
new treaty. However, an EU official confirmed: "We retain, except
for the name of the minister, the Constitutional Treaty text of 2004
including the provisions on the UN. "There is a provision which
provides for the representative of the EU to state the position of
the EU at the UN Security Council." The Government had insisted that
negotiations on the treaty had ensured that the British presence on
the Security Council would never be replaced by an EU
representative. However, the text provides for the British seat to
be occupied by an EU minister when the bloc has a united position on
issues. Mr Hague, the shadow foreign secretary, has criticised
Gordon Brown for allowing "one of the most damaging and important
provisions in the rejected EU Constitution" to be resurrected after
referendums by the French and Dutch two years ago voted against it [i]
[3] My personal tracking of Javier Solana began in late
November, 1995 – November 22 to be precise. As a culmination of his
dual six month rotating presidencies of the European Union and
Western European Union, Solana executed and signed a comprehensive
Treaty of Association with Israel on November 20, 1995.[4]
Only one week later, he would preside over the first Barcelona
Conference designed to battle religious fundamentalism, set the
stage for a Mediterranean Free Trade zone to be launched in 2010,
and eliminate and/or reduce USA presence in the Mediterranean. Two
days after the conclusion of that conference, he would be
unanimously selected as a "dark horse candidate" to the
disappointment of former Dutch president Ruud Lubbers who
aspired to the job, to be the new Secretary General of NATO.[5]
More surprisingly still was that this NATO job came to him only a
scant few
months after he dispatched Spanish warships against the Canada he
declared a virtual state of war
against. more...
|
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
Solana |
This is very interesting news.
Solana talks of revival The
European Weekly (July 21, 2007)
- The European Union has vowed full support for US President George
W Bush’s renewed drive to revive stalled Middle East peace talks and
seek a two-state solution to the conflict. EU foreign and security
policy chief Javier Solana said the 27-nation bloc also backed
Bush’s call for an international conference to explore moves to
create an independent Palestinian state. “The European Union
will continue to work side by side with the United States ... in a
determined effort to bring about an end to the Arab-Israeli conflict,”
said Solana. Solana said the proposed international meeting would
also give substantial support to the parties in negotiations towards
a permanent settlement. The diplomatic Quartet - whose members
include the US and the EU as well as Russia and the United Nations -
would have a “major part” to play in such a gathering, he added.
Solana is also expected to underline EU support for the Bush
initiative in talks with the new Quartet envoy and former British
premier Tony Blair who was in Brussels for meetings with key EU
officials. The Quartet was to meet in Lisbon for the first time
since the appointment of Blair. It was also the first encounter of
the group since Hamas captured the Gaza Strip in June and the
subsequent nomination of a non-Hamas interim government led by
Palestinian prime minister-designate Salam Fayyad. Bush has said
the US will provide full backing to Blair’s peace efforts but
several EU officials and ministers, including Solana, were taken
aback by the US push to give the former British premier the Quartet
job. Like the US, the EU has pledged to improve the clout and
standing of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and his moderate
Fatah movement. But unlike Washington, the EU has yet to release
millions of dollars in direct aid to the Fatah-led Palestinian
government. The funds were frozen after last year’s Hamas electoral
victory. The militant group is black-listed as a terrorist
organisation by the EU and the US. The EU has, however, been
channelling aid for the Palestinian health and security sector
through non-governmental aid groups. Officials said an estimated 700
million Euro in such emergency aid was sent to Gaza and the West
Bank last year. The money was used to pay the salaries of teachers,
doctors and health workers and for supplies of fuel, water and
electricity to the territories. Bush has announced USD 190 million
in direct aid to the Palestinian government, with an additional USD
80 million for security. The amount includes funding humanitarian
causes in Gaza. “We are showing the Palestinian people that a
commitment to peace leads to the generous support of the United
States,” Bush said. |
Israel |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
Solana |
1st
Seal |
Dividing the Land | America
|
Beit Hanassi: The Peace President
The Jerusalem Post (July
19, 2007) - President Shimon
Peres,
Israel's eldest statesman known for his vision of "a new Middle
East," proclaimed in his inaugural speech in the Knesset on Sunday
that he was leaving divisive politics after six decades to devote
himself "to unifying the nation." But, the 83-year-old declared
defiantly, he would not shy away from using the presidency to
promote peace in the region. "When the opportunity for peace is
created, it must not be missed," Peres told a packed house after
taking the oath of office. "[The president] must encourage peace
processes. At home. With our neighbors. In the entire region." Five
Arab MKs chose to attend a poetry reading in Haifa by Palestinian
national poet Mahmoud Darwish instead of the inauguration, but the
gallery was full of VIPs and invited guests. The ceremony ushering
in Peres as the country's ninth president capped a momentous career
that included international acclaim and a Nobel Peace Prize but also
a string of embarrassing electoral defeats - including his last
presidential race against Moshe Katsav seven years ago. In a
half-hour interview with the Associated Press on the day of his
inauguration, Peres pledged to fight poverty and global warming and
even expressed the hope of making peace with Iran. "After such a
long career, let me just say something: My appetite to manage is
over. My inclination to dream and to envisage is greater," he said,
looking vigorous and discounting age as a factor that could slow him
down. He wasted no time in getting down to business, moving into
Beit Hanassi a day later. He told staff at the presidential
residence: "Remember, we are the servants of the people, and not
their masters." He then began a flurry of diplomatic meetings,
most notably welcoming EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana
on Wednesday. Peres told him that those residents of Gaza who
voted Hamas into power must not be allowed to determine the future
of the whole Palestinian people. He commended Solana for the work he
has done over the years to try to bring peace to the region and
argued that despite the current difficulties, there are "new
opportunities." "Europe can play a major role," he
said. Solana concurred, saying he hoped that the peace that they had
discussed "so many times together" would one day become a reality.
Then, addressing Peres directly, he said: "Mr. President and my dear
friend, it is a moving moment to see you here." Solana
was plainly confident that as president Peres would be able to do
much more to advance the peace process than anyone else.
more... |
Israel |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
Solana |
1st
Seal |
Dividing the Land
Russian expels 4 British diplomats Associated
Press (July 19, 2007) -
Russia said Thursday it will expel four British diplomats and
suspend counterterrorism cooperation with London, the latest move in
a mounting confrontation over the radiation poisoning death of
former KGB officer Alexander Litvinenko. President Vladimir Putin
said he was certain both nations would overcome what he called "a
mini-crisis." A spokesman for Prime Minister Gordon Brown called the
Russian move "completely unjustified." "It's necessary to balance
one's actions with common sense, to respect the legal rights and
interests of partners — then everything will develop in the best
way," the ITAR-Tass news agency quoted Putin as saying. "I'm sure we
will overcome this mini-crisis, too." Britain had announced Monday
the expulsion of four Russian diplomats and restrictions on visas
issued to Russian government officials after Moscow refused to
extradite Andrei Lugovoi, accused of killing Litvinenko in London
last November. The dispute marks a new low in relations between
Moscow and London, which had already been troubled by Russia's
opposition to the war in Iraq, Britain's refusal to extradite exiled
tycoon Boris Berezovsky to face embezzlement charges, and by Kremlin
allegations last year of spying by British diplomats. Foreign
Ministry spokesman Mikhail Kamynin announced the expulsions after
summoning British Ambassador Anthony Brenton to the ministry and
informing him. Kamynin described Russia's response as "targeted,
balanced and the minimum necessary." He contended that Russia was
forced to respond, saying Britain had made a "conscious choice of
worsening relations with our country."
more... |
Gog/Magog |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
The European Security and Defense Policy: A Challenge to the
Transatlantic Security Alliance
Heritage
Foundation by Sally McNamara (July
18, 2007)
- NOTE: The
original link
to the Heritage Foundation is no longer working.
The most text I could find was from the link in the title.
The
terrorist attacks on New York and Washington in 2001, Madrid in
2004, and London in 2005 profoundly demonstrate the new security
threats facing the West. Transnational terrorism, the proliferation
of weapons of mass destruction, and unstable or failed states
present daunting challenges to the entire Euro-Atlantic community
and require a long-term sustained response. It is essential that
Europe rise to the challenge of these new threats. Finding the right
strategic and structural balance is equally imperative. A strong
Europe of independent self-determining nation-states invested in
NATO and protected by NATO will contribute far more to
transatlantic security than will a deeply integrated European Union
(EU) usurping NATO's role. The European Security and Defense Policy
(ESDP) has emerged as one of the biggest attempts to expand EU power
to date, centralizing the most important tools of nation-statehood.
The militarization of the European Union marks one of the greatest
geopolitical shifts in the transatlantic alliance since the end of
the Second World War. As a political initiative, it embodies the
worst elements of European animosity toward the United States and
would fundamentally undermine the NATO alliance and the
Anglo-American Special Relationship. A Challenge to the
Transatlantic Alliance Since its establishment in 1998, the ESDP has
been fashioned by EU elites into a military identity distinct from
and independent of NATO. It has become a tool for projecting
European power in the world and promoting the EU as a global actor.
The EU has long used institutional program-building to advance its
centralizing and integrationist policies, and the ESDP is critical
to achieving "ever closer union." The ESDP's Franco-British
Foundations. When British Prime Minister Tony Blair and French
President Jacques Chirac heralded the ESDP at St. Malo, France, in
1998, it was reasonable to assume that Blair envisioned an ESDP very
different from the one envisioned by Chirac--an ESDP that would
complement NATO, not rival it. On the other hand, the French have
long coveted a European defense identity specifically to counter
American global power. Through a supranational foray into foreign
policy areas such as military operations, the ESDP became Chirac's
latest ruse to rival America. When EU elites talk about the balance
of power, they mean that the EU should balance American
hyperpuissance.[1] As Lady Margaret Thatcher stated: France has for
many years wanted to see an alternative military power to an
American-led NATO. The European Union's plans for a separate
integrated European defence provided the French with a unique
opportunity to achieve this goal.[2] Rather than meaningfully
address shared transatlantic security challenges, the
militarization of the EU through the ESDP actually presents a number
of challenges by itself. The U.S. should not confuse its desire to
see European countries take on more security and defense
responsibilities, both in Europe and in the wider world, with the
ramifications of further European military integration--especially
in terms of America's ability to build alliances. The potential to
destabilize the successful transatlantic security alliance has never
been greater, and in that respect, the ESDP should not be viewed as
an effective strategic partnership. more...
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
Solana
| NewWorldOrder |
Proposals sought to train journalists in European neighbourhood Media
for Freedom (July 17, 2007)
- The European Commission is seeking an organisation to design,
develop and implement a regional training and networking project for
journalists and media professionals from 16 countries in the
European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument's (ENPI) southern
and eastern regions: Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Egypt,
Georgia, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Moldova, Morocco, Palestinian
Territories, the Russian Federation, Syria, Tunisia and Ukraine. The
project aims to train at least 200 journalists, editors, producers
and other media professionals to develop the professional skills
required to report on EU affairs; to support them in using their
newly acquired skills and knowledge by developing a complementary
program for at least 50 of their editors, managers and owners; and
to develop a network of trained journalists and other media
specialists across the beneficiary countries. The maximum budget
available is 4 million Euros (US$ 5.5 million). Applications (in
English) must be submitted by 8 August 2007. Four to eight
short-listed candidates will be invited to submit detailed project
proposals. For further information, go
here. |
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
Recruiting in the West: The Lure of Radical Islamic Terror Family
Security Matters (July 12, 2007)
- Many question why individuals located in or
raised in the freedoms of the West would ever want to engage in
terrorism. What would make someone who had seen all of the good
things freedom has to offer, turn against that freedom? When
consulting with and training law enforcement I point out that often,
members of terror groups are professional and very well educated.
Terror organizations purposely encourage recruits to become learned,
particularly in hard sciences, so that they can understand Western
technology and use it against the enemy. Every facet of the enemy
should be contemplated, absorbed, and repackaged for use by the
terror group. Thus, it was not surprising that the latest terror
plot in Europe involved doctors. Anyone can be recruited into a
terror organization as long as the individual has the right mindset.
Whether one is African American, Caucasian, Hispanic, professional
or blue collar, male or female, young or old, the terror draw is
always dependent upon the individual’s personality. Simply, the
basic concepts for terror motivation include identity and injury.
Those who are radical in any religion identify themselves first and
foremost as members of the religious group. The religion dictates
everything, from law to private life. Of note, this is true of all
religions. One’s faith and religious obligation are put above
everything and everyone, and there is no room for question. This
creates a dissonance for some Muslims who are raised in and those
who move to the West. There is a discrepancy between what they read
in the Koran, what they observe in Jihad (there are over 150 versus
about Jihad in the Koran), and how they view those Muslims who lead
peaceful, tolerant lives. They often feel inferior because they do
not necessarily fit in, and they can perceive discrimination whether
it occurs or not. In essence, in the West there are many young
Muslims who believe that they do not have community. Suspicious
glances by non-Muslims and contempt from Muslims in the Middle East
make them feel like second-class individuals. That is, they know
that because of the actions of many violent Muslims, they themselves
are looked at with question. At the same time, those they encounter
from the Middle East view them as innovators who do not practice
true Islam. Because they live in the West and may partake in Western
behaviors (including speech and style of dress) they are mocked by
more fundamentalist Muslims as being taghut
(impure). So they are not quite fully Western and not ‘fully’
Muslim. This can make them uncomfortable and question identity.
Usually it is at this time that the individual on the radical path
suffers a life set back. Whether it is due to the West or not, the
young Muslim loses someone or something dear. This may be very
personal such as the death of a loved one, or it may be viewing
Muslims injured around the world. It may be a personal illness,
which precludes him from following a dream. Whatever it is, there is
something that forces the Muslim to reevaluate his life. Many times,
he feels as if he has lost that which matters most to him. With loss
and the identity question, dissonance grows. In an effort to escape
the pain of loss, young Muslims on the path to radicalism search for
more substance in their lives. A psychological struggle ensues. On
one hand, they are part of the West, and they can see some good
aspects to it, such as specific kind individuals. On the other hand,
they are Muslim, and they see the struggles of Muslims worldwide.
They see oppressive regimes propped up by the West. And because they
perceive themselves as outcasts, they gravitate toward their
religion because it cuts across cultures, socioeconomic status, race
etc. In this, they find community. Then they focus their attention
to the plight of Muslims worldwide in a search for self-fulfillment
and acceptance. They hear the ever-present call to defend and spread
Islam and become psychologically isolated from the West. When they
internalize perceived/actual discrimination and zero in on global
Islamic causes, they come to an understanding that Muslims suffer
because of Western influence and policies. Slowly, the West is
viewed as a villain, and anxiety and questions plague the young
Muslims. more...
|
Islam
|
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
America
|
An interesting
insightful look into the mindset of the radical Muslim today.
Euro Hits New High Against U.S. Dollar Associated
Press (July 10, 2007) - The euro shot to an all-time
high against the U.S. dollar Tuesday on concerns about the American
economy that were fueled by discouraging growth forecasts from key
U.S. retailers and homebuilders. The British pound, which has been
trading around 26-year highs against the dollar, briefly touched
$2.0273 after reports showed British consumer prices were rising at a
faster pace than the target set by the Bank of England. The euro hit a
new record of $1.3738 Tuesday, its highest level against the dollar
since the 13-nation currency started trading in 1999, before
retreating to $1.3729. That was still above the euro's previous high
of $1.3682 reached on April 27 and the $1.3623 it bought late Monday
in New York. A higher euro makes goods from the 13-nation currency
zone more expensive for customers abroad. Along with the rise in the
pound, the stronger euro also makes visits to much of Europe more
expensive for travelers from elsewhere and makes shopping trips to the
U.S. more appealing to Europeans. "The dollar is a basket case," said
Peter Schiff, president of Euro Pacific Capital Inc. "We are going to
pay the piper for years of having the underlying fundamentals of our
economy disintegrate beneath our feet." Given the state of the U.S.
economy, he said, the dollar could continue to fall in the coming
years against the Euro, to $2.50 or even $3. more... | NewWorldOrder |
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom |
America
| As the Middle
East oil moves to the Euro, so will the rest of the world gravitate
there as the dollar weakens and our fake system collapses as it
inevitably would.
Learn the history of the Federal Reserve, which is neither
federal nor reserve. Where money is made out of thin air in exchange
for the manual labor required of the masses to pay it back. This
system works great for the powerful few that had the money and run
the banks until inflation pops their bubble and we all fly apart.
This is part of the plan of the New World Order, who needs a weaker
more dependent America because the center of power is not going to
fall on America, but on the
revived Roman Empire of Bible prophecy. Given the
HIStory, Our Future Bible studies, it's a matter of years
away.
'Prodi
Meets With Palestinian Leaders LifeinItaly.com (July
10, 2007) - Italian Premier
Romano Prodi on Tuesday meets with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas
and Prime Minister Salam Fayyad, wrapping up a three-day visit to the
Middle East. Prodi met Tuesday morning in Jerusalem with the
Palestinian Authority's chief negotiator, Saeb Erekat, and with top
Catholic Church officials in the Holy Land. Before returning to Rome
Tuesday evening, the Italian premier will travel to Bethlehem to visit
the Dheisheh refugee camp and the Church of the Nativity. |
Islam |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | 1st
Seal |
EU eyes its next big challenges BBC
News (July 10, 2007) - As the dust settles from the EU's June summit rows, the mood
in Brussels is subdued but largely positive, as many start to eye up
the next big challenges. Europe's leaders agreed at the summit the key
elements of a new reform treaty, to replace the unloved constitution,
but a detailed final deal has yet to be agreed, and could still cause
problems. Meanwhile, policy-makers are also turning to other
challenges, including energy and climate change negotiations, the
union's troubled enlargement process with Turkey and the Balkans, and
the perennial issue of the EU's budget and its expensive Common
Agricultural Policy (CAP). What sort of European players the two new
leaders of France and
the UK, Nicolas Sarkozy
and Gordon Brown, will turn out to be is also the subject of much
conversation in the coffee bars of the European institutions. One
senior EU diplomat says he is not expecting any major new rows over
the reform treaty: "Everyone, frankly, is delighted to get
this out the way - whether it's wonderful or not... most people are
satisfied with what they got." The Portuguese, now at the
union's helm for the next six months, will produce the first detailed
draft of the new reform treaty for the launch of the so-called
intergovernmental conference on 23 July. They hope that a deal can be
done by October, and signed formally in December. A British Liberal
Democrat MEP, Andrew Duff, thinks the treaty deal "has
unblocked political energy", though he suggests a deal
by October is "pushing it". But some are worried that the
Poles, who almost
blocked agreement at the summit, will try to unpick the deal that was
done. The EU diplomat agrees that "that is the unknown, we can't say
it will all be fine," and adds that the problem with the Polish
negotiating style is as much about expertise as politics. "I do buy
into the idea that the Poles don't have the people," he says. "The
[Polish] sherpas were an absolute disaster fighting amongst
themselves, and the two deputy prime ministers trying to undermine the
prime minister."The attempt to get the new reform treaty through
without any troublesome referendums is also being questioned by some.
Krzysztof Bobinski, of the Unia & Polska Foundation in Warsaw, argues
the Union is playing with fire in attempting to get a reform treaty
that is very similar to the constitutional treaty through parliaments
without the promised referendums. "The EU governments will
probably get away with it but the problem of democratic legitimacy...
will not go away. "Indeed, if it isn't addressed, it will come back to
haunt the EU and provoke more crises," he says. Another
debate linked to the reform treaty deal is whether the UK's multiple
opt-outs - from fundamental rights to justice and home affairs issues
- signal the UK's return to the margins of Europe. Mr. Duff thinks it
does. "If it has not yet sunk in, in the UK, that it has effectively
designed for itself a second-class membership of the EU, it is fast
sinking in in Brussels," he says. A European diplomat based in London
agrees, saying: "Presumably, we now leave the Brits behind."
more... |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
The attitude of just passing through something, regardless of how good
or bad, is a scary attitude to have. America has the same disease,
which will end up allowing bad laws to pass.
Muslims declare sovereignty over U.S., UK WorldNet
Daily (July 9, 2007) -
Across town from the site of the recent attempted car-bomb attacks,
several thousand Muslims gathered in front of the London Central
Mosque to applaud fiery preachers prophesying the overthrow of the
British government – a future vision that encompasses an Islamic
takeover of the White House and the rule of the Quran over America.
"One day my dear Muslims," shouted Anjem Choudary, "Islam will
govern Britain!" Choudary was a co-founder of Al Muhajiroun, the
now-banned group tied to suspects in the July 7, 2005, London
transport bombings and a
cheerleader of the 9/11 attacks. "Democracy, hypocrisy,"
Choudary chanted as the crowd echoed him. "Tony Blair, terrorist!
Tony Blair, murderer! Queen Elizabeth, go to hell!" The Muslim
leader's charge, along with interviews with protesters and a
"literal foaming-at-the-mouth" diatribe by another speaker, were
captured on tape June 22 by
nationally syndicated talk radio host Rusty Humphries.
Humphries, who was in London with WND Jerusalem bureau chief Aaron
Klein, recorded angry Muslim leader Abu Saif, who kept his voice at
a fever pitch through declarations such as: "Brothers and sisters,
make no mistake. Make no mistake. The British government, the queen,
the MPs in this country, they are enemies to you, enemies to Allah
and enemies to the Muslims." A protester told Humphries Abu Saif is
a member of the group Hizb ut-Tahrir, the Party of Liberation, which
states its aim is to unify Muslims and establish the rule of Islamic
law over the world. Group spokesman Taji Mustafa insisted to WND,
however, Abu Saif is not a member. Hizb ut-Tahrir, which casts
itself as "non-violent," also has denied
testimony and British media reports charging its Cambridge cell
tried recruit the Iraqi doctor now suspected of mounting the attack
on Glasgow's airport June 30. The failed car-bomb assault followed
two similar attempts in London the previous day.
more... |
Islam |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
America
|
Ten EU FMs tell Blair road map is dead, call for int'l conference Jerusalem
Post (July 9, 2007) - A group of 10 EU foreign ministers has called for an
international conference on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, calling
the road map peace plan dead. In a letter to the Quartet's new Middle
East envoy, former British Prime Minister Tony Blair,
the foreign ministers said the status quo that had prevailed since
2000 was leading nowhere. Signing the letter, which was published in
the French daily Le Monde on Monday, were the foreign ministers
of France, Italy, Spain, Greece, Portugal, Bulgaria, Romania, Cyprus,
Slovenia and Malta. They called on Israel to make more concessions to
boost the standing of Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas,
such as the release of thousands of Palestinian prisoners including
Fatah leaders, and the immediate release of all the frozen Palestinian
customs duties. A senior official in Jerusalem noted that the letter
did not constitute a change in policy of either the EU or the Quartet,
and both bodies remain officially committed to the road map. The
official also noted that individual European foreign ministers would
sometimes state opinions on Middle East issues that actually
contradicted the policy of the governments in which they serve.
Foreign Ministry spokesman Mark Regev said Israel remained committed
to the road map. He said the reason why there had been no progress on
the plan until now was because the Palestinian leadership rejected
peace and implementation of the measures called for in it. "Hopefully,
with the formation of a new Palestinian government, we can take steps
towards implementation of the road map," Regev said. more...
|
Israel |
Islam |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | 1st
Seal |
EU Med states call for Mideast peace conference Reuters
(July 9, 2007) - The foreign ministers of France, Italy, Spain and seven other
European states called on Monday for an international conference on
the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and said Israel should make more
concessions for peace. Israeli officials said on Sunday that an
Arab League delegation from Egypt and Jordan had proposed visiting
Israel this week for long-delayed talks on an Arab peace initiative.
In an open letter to new big-power Middle East envoy Tony Blair, the
foreign ministers of the EU's Mediterranean states -- Bulgaria,
Cyprus, Spain, France, Greece, Italy, Portugal, Malta, Romania and
Slovenia -- welcomed Arab states' efforts for peace following the
stalled U.S.-backed "road map." "The road map has failed. The status
quo that has prevailed since 2000 is leading to nothing," the
ministers said in their letter, published in French daily Le Monde.
The ministers said there was a need to "redefine our objectives,"
adding that Europe and the Quartet of Middle East mediators should
firmly tell Israel to make more concessions in support of Palestinian
President Mahmoud Abbas. Israel's cabinet agreed on Sunday to release
250 Palestinian prisoners in the latest attempt to strengthen the
Western-backed president after Hamas's seizure of the Gaza Strip.
Abbas, a member of Fatah, disbanded a Hamas-led government and
appointed an emergency government after Hamas's violent takeover of
the Gaza Strip on June 14. The ministers said one of their new
objectives was "to obtain from Israel concrete and immediate measures
in favor of Mahmoud Abbas. "Among these, the transfer of all taxes
due, the release of the thousands of prisoners who do not have blood
on their hands, the release as well of the main Palestinian leaders to
ensure succession within Fatah, a freeze in new settlements and the
evacuation of unauthorized settlements," they said. Israel has handed
over only part of Palestinian tax revenues it has withheld since Hamas
won election in 2006. The ministers said another aim was to take into
account Israel's need for security and consider creating an
international force to impose a ceasefire among Palestinians, as Abbas
has called for. The idea of a robust international force, of the NATO
or U.N. Chapter VII kind, deserves to be examined," they said. Chapter
VII allows the use of force. The 10 ministers who signed the letter
are not as such part of the Quartet -- which is composed of the United
States, Russia, the United Nations and the European Union -- but they
influence the EU element. "We know how inventive and resolute you
are," the ministers told Blair in their letter. "We are therefore
certain you will deal with these problems in a global manner. Hence
the importance of holding without delay an international conference
including all the parties to the conflict," said the ministers, who
met on Friday. |
Israel |
Islam |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | 1st
Seal |
It continues to be apparent that Europe is very much biased against
Israel. Regardless of the clear history of where the conflict began,
Europe and friends are working for the appeasement of the radical
Islamic element and pushing Israel to concede more and more. Even
releasing those who were jailed and are going to turn around and try
to kill Israelis upon their release. We can also see the push to move
away from the U.S. road map towards another solution which is being
headed through Europe. This falls right in line with Bible prophecy
that puts a seven-year confirmation of a covenant in the 70th week of
Daniel. In the middle of that seven years the abomination of
desolation will take place and the stage is being set for that now.
Europe has a leader who has produced a seven-year European
Neighborhood Policy (ENP) that has a mid-term review. The fourth
kingdom is becoming the center of the push for peace in the Middle
East and they are clearly biased against Israel. For more of the
factual historical analysis of Israel's right to the land, read Joan
Peters book,
From Time Immemorial: The Origins of the Arab-Jewish Conflict over
Palestine.
Bush OKs 'integration' with European Union WorldNetDaily
(May 8, 2007) - President Bush
signed an agreement creating a "permanent body" that commits the
U.S. to "deeper transatlantic economic integration," without
ratification by the Senate as a treaty or passage by Congress as a
law. The "Transatlantic Economic Integration" between the U.S. and
the European Union was
signed April 30 at the White House
by Bush, German Chancellor Angela Merkel – the current president of
the European Council – and European Commission President José Manuel
Barroso. The
document acknowledges "the transatlantic economy remains at the
forefront of globalization," arguing
that the U.S. and the European Union "seek to strengthen
transatlantic economic integration." The agreement established a new
Transatlantic Economic Council to be chaired on the U.S. side by a
cabinet-level officer in the White House and on the EU side by a
member of the European Commission. The current U.S. head of the new
Transatlantic Economic Council is
Allan Hubbard, assistant to the
president for Economic Policy and director of the National Economic
Council. The current EU head of the council is
Günther Verheugen, vice-President of
the European Commission in charge of enterprise and industry. The
Transatlantic Economic Council was tasked with creating regulatory
convergence between the U.S. and the EU on some 40 different public
policy areas, including intellectual property rights, developing
security standards for international trade, getting U.S. GAAP
(Generally Accepted Accounting Practices) recognized in Europe,
developing innovation and technology in health industries,
implementing RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) technologies,
developing a science-based plan on bio-based products and
establishing a "regular dialogue" to address obstacles to
investment. At a
joint press conference, Bush thanked
the other two leaders for signing the "trans-Atlantic economic
integration plan," commenting that, "It is a recognition that the
closer that the United States and the EU become, the better off our
people will be." Barroso said the Transatlantic Economic Council is
meant to be "a permanent body, with senior people on both sides of
the Atlantic." As
WND has reported, Secretary of
Commerce Carlos Gutierrez repeatedly has pushed for North American
integration, much as the April 30 agreement proposes closer U.S.-EU
integration. Mexico's ambassador to the U.N., Enrique Berruga, has
called for a North American Union to be created in the next eight
years. more...
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom | NewWorldOrder |
America |
Global
governance is not necessarily losing national identity, but having
laws dictated by foreign interests. This is exactly what is
happening. In a Western world that prides itself on rule of law,
whoever writes the laws controls the nations. What is being worked
toward now is integrating international law that trumps national
law. This is a very dangerous game to play with men hungry for
power. They have done an effective job hiding their evil intentions
from the world and to find out what they've been up to one must
search it out. Most people are content with their personal situation
enough to let things move on in their course. The Security and
Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP.gov)
is meeting in a formal organizational structure working to integrate
and harmonize our laws. The course of the world today is taking us
directly to the fulfillment of Bible prophecy and those in control
in the world are not looking out for the interests of the world, but
are consolidating their power to control the world with their brand
of laws meant to further solidify their control. This will
eventually be handed over to the antichrist. That the man of sin is
said to come from a revived Rome -- See
Daniel 9:26,27
-- is interesting considering what has been occurring since EUROMED
-- E.U. "ROMED" -- in 1995 with the consolidation of power in
Europe. Now we are seeing this integration of international trade is
creating the infrastructure and the beginning of governmental
integration that can more easily be used in the future to integrate
control of many nations through laws dictated from outside the
United States. This is only the beginning, and it starts out
seemingly insignificant so as not to catch the ire of the
population. "We are grateful to
the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other
publications whose directors have attended our meetings and
respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It
would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world
if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during
those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared
to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty
of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to
the National auto-determination practiced in past centuries."
-David Rockefeller in an address to Trilateral
Commission meeting, 1991
Turkey’s leaders plan Muslim Europe
The First Post (July
9, 2007)
- If you thought Turkey was no threat to the West, think again. A new
generation of politicians is aiming to Islamise the state by stealth.
The AKP - Adalet ve Kalkinma Partisi, or Justice and Development Party
- has a stranglehold on Turkey for the foreseeable future. Since
coming to power, the AKP has done nothing revolutionary, but it does
have a revolutionary agenda. The AKP was founded to replace a previous
Islamic party banned for extremism. It benefited hugely from the
corruption scandals that dragged down the previous government, taking
two-thirds of parliament in the 2002 general election (on a third of
the vote). On Friday, its ex-foreign secretary Abdullah Gul narrowly
failed to win a victory in the first round of presidential elections.
The result was close enough to prompt public demonstrations by
secularists ahead of the second round voting on May 2, and a statement
from the military - long the guardians of Turkey's secular traditions
- warning against a pro-Islam political agenda. For all their suavity,
its leaders seek to transform the country into a Sunni Muslim
republic. This collides with institutions and laws strictly limiting
Islam's role in public life, and with a long-standing security
alliance with Israel.
more... |
Islam
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
Solana steps up effort to fill anti-terrorism post European
Voice (July 5, 2007) - Javier Solana, the EU’s foreign policy chief, is expected to fill the
post of EU counter-terrorism co-ordinator soon but with a strengthened
role and mandate. Efforts to fill the post, which was
vacated by Gijs de Vries, a Dutch politician, in March, have
intensified after the terrorist incidents in the UK this week.
Member states support boosting the position, with Wolfgang Schaüble,
Germany’s interior minister, saying that the current job description
and mandate were “not sufficient”. “The construction of the post is
not sufficient…the matter now is to look for a new construction. Until
now it has been a position of the Council [of Ministers] but that is
not effective enough,” he said, in an interview with European Voice.
The role could involve stronger powers in scrutinising police
co-operation across the EU and monitoring how relevant EU legislation
is functioning, an EU official said. The post could also
involve an enhanced role in co-operating with third countries on
counter-terrorism. There are suggestions that the post could involve
co-ordination of anti-terror activities across the EU institutions.
But the official said that this was “out of the question”, as it would
involve the new anti-terror co-ordinator stealing powers from the
European Commission. Franco Frattini, the European commissioner for
justice, freedom and security, said that it was up to the Council to
decide if the post should be strengthened, but added: “The Council is
leading the co-ordination of the intergovernmental area while I am
leading the communitarian [European Community] area of the issue.” The
post is expected to be filled by appointing a candidate from a large
member state, said one diplomat. The position has remained vacant
since de Vries stepped down because Solana and his office have not had
time to find a replacement. Instead, they have focused their attention
on the crises in the Middle East and with Iran, as well as on reform
of the EU’s institutions. But the recent terrorist incidents in the UK
have highlighted the need to step up co-ordination against terrorism
at EU level and are expected to boost efforts to fill the post.
Frattini on Tuesday (3 July) announced that he would be introducing
legislation in the autumn to criminalise the posting of information
about bomb-making on the internet and that he intended to set up a
database to track the storage and use of explosives across the EU. He
reiterated his intention to introduce a European system for collecting
information on airline passengers entering the EU. Frattini said that
he wanted each member state to set up a national unit to collect and
store such information, which includes credit card details, passport
number and who a passenger is flying with. Frattini said that he was
also sending out a questionnaire to all member states asking how they
deal with religious education and prevent radicalisation. He said that
this was intended to “protect the large majority of Muslims living
here peacefully”. |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | Solana
|
1st Seal |
Remember Revelation 6:1,2, "And
I saw when the Lamb opened one of the seals, and I heard, as it were
the noise of thunder, one of the four beasts saying, Come and see. And
I saw, and behold a white horse: and he that sat on him
had a bow; and a crown was given unto him: and he went forth
conquering, and to conquer." and Daniel
8:25, "And through his policy also he
shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify
himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he
shall also stand up against the Prince of princes; but he shall be
broken without hand." As I've mentioned before, Daniel 8:25
refers to a historical figure, Antiochus IV Epiphanes. He was a type
of antichrist, even placing an idol in the Holy of Holies, thus
performing the abomination of desolation and causing the Macabbean
revolt. The same spirit is behind the end-time man of sin. Terrorism
is a cause for peace and safety that is brought about by going forth
conquering. It is also a means to place controls on society that will
eventually lead to the mark of the beast. Another trademark is
entering in by flatteries, and that's what politics is all about. The
master politician knows how to wear the right masks at the right times
to elevate the pride of those you wish to get something from, playing
to their egos in return for cooperation. The question is who will fill
the anti-terrorism post? Whoever it is, it appears that Solana is
appointing them. Keep watching!
The Second Beast Rises FulfilledProphecy (July
5, 2007) - A recent
press release from the United Nations' secretary-general, Ban Ki-moon,
makes a startling statement. It says that the teachings of a 13th
century, Persian poet--Maulana Rumi--capture the goals of the UN's "Alliance
of Civilizations." As followers of FP know, the AoC is an
initiative launched under the UN's previous secretary-general, Kofi
Annan, to combat religious extremism and end the tensions that divide
the Western and Muslim worlds. The UN realized it can never achieve
its goal of creating a peaceful world unless it first achieves
religious tolerance. It plans to focus its efforts on education,
media, migration and youth. The AoC is being implemented under the
framework of the "Euro-Mediterranean Partnership" and the "European
Neighbourhood Policy" (both which seek to bring peace and stability to
the Middle East) with a goal of extending the AoC globally. An AoC
"High Representative," Jorge Sampaio (former president of Portugal),
has been appointed to lead these efforts, and Javier Solana, the EU's
High Representative, has
endorsed the AoC. The UN's goal is for the AoC to become
operational by the end of 2009--just in time for the middle of
Daniel's 70th week in 2010 (if it, indeed, started Jan, 1, 2007). The
emergence of the AoC is significant because it marked the beginning of
a formal, spiritual agenda by the UN. And what are the UN's spiritual
beliefs? According to the secretary-general, Ki-moon, they can be
found in the writings of Maulana Rumi, which you can read
here. Ki-moon goes so far as to call himself a "student" of Rumi.
Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the prime minister of Turkey--co-sponsor of the
AoC with Spain--told the UN General Assembly that spreading Rumi's
message throughout the world "will greatly strengthen our efforts
within the framework of the Alliance of Civilizations."
Read his speech here. Turkey is currently sponoring an
exhibit featuring Rumi's work at the Hagia Sophia in Istanbul.
Rumi taught that, originally, we were all part of God and, through
spiritual enlightenment, we'll eventually make our way back to God.
Like other Eastern and New Age teachings, Rumi taught that only when
individuals attain inner peace--and don't discriminate against other
beliefs--can they create a peaceful world. The core of all faiths, he
taught, is love. His writings are attractive to the United Nations
because they teach a "humanist philosophy and ... highlight the
principles of tolerance, understanding and compassion," according to
Ki-moon. Rumi's poems have gained a pop-culture following through
recorded readings by celebrities, like Madonna's video "Bittersweet."
Lyrics here. Rumi's teachings give us
insights into the beliefs guiding the UN and its Alliance of
Civilizations. Such beliefs mesh perfectly with the EU's secular
humanistic philosophy. The bottom line in both Eastern and humanistic
thinking is that human beings are God--though these teachings may have
different ways of getting there. And, of course, the teaching that
human beings can be like God is the same old lie Satan told Eve in the
garden of Eden (Genesis
3:5). This satanic teaching is, sadly, even being promoted within
our own Christian quarters through the popular "Word-Faith Movement."
My skin has crawled when I've heard Creflo Dollar blasphemously state
on Christian television: "You are gods," while also denying the
divinity of Christ.
Watch him here. We know from Bible
prophecy that the Antichrist also will hold to a type of this
thinking. In the middle of Daniel's 70th week, he will go into the
rebuilt Jewish temple and proclaim himself to be God (Daniel
11:36-37,
2 Thessalonians 2:3-4). So, we can see how different non-Christian
beliefs seem to be merging into the end-time false religious system
that the Bible describes as "the beast from the earth" (Revelation
13:11-18). This false religious system will support the "beast
from the sea" (the revival of the Roman Empire under the Antichrist,
which appears to have risen in the European Union). It also will be
responsible for the most violent persecution of God's people ever.
Christians--with their beliefs about sin,
judgment and Jesus as the only Savior--are going to be seen as hate
mongers standing in the way of global unity. And those who are more
fully "enlightened" or "evolved"--a word choice depending on whether
their thinking is Eastern or secular humanistic--will be seen as
humanity's true saviors. Students of Bible prophecy would do well to
keep their eyes on the Alliance of Civilizations.
more... |
Islam
|
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
Al Qaeda's No. 2 says end of West imminent, video shows CNN (July
5, 2007) - In a newly released videotaped message
similar to a "fireside chat," al Qaeda's second-in-command issues
advice and directives for the Muslim world, terrorism expert Laura
Mansfield said Wednesday. In the one-hour, 34-minute video, titled
"The Advice of One Concerned," Ayman al-Zawahiri includes clips from
other videos and news broadcasts, including one from al-Furqan, the
video production arm of the Islamic State of Iraq, according to
Mansfield, who obtained the video. Al-Zawahiri says in the message
that the defeat of the West is imminent, and that "the enemy" is
trying to forestall the inevitable, Mansfield said. "The good omens of
the new dawn of victory have begun to loom on the horizon, with
Allah's permission and will," he says. "And the stage preceding
victory is normally, in the history of nations, the stage in which
there is most seen an increase in conspiracies, plots and inciting of
discord in an attempt by the enemy, who has begun to see his defeat
approach, to push back and delay the defeat as much as he can." Al-Zawahiri
does not reference the recent terrorism incidents in the United
Kingdom in the video. Mansfield said it appears to be more of a "state
of the ummah [community]" style of address "intended to try and
provide advice to the Muslim world in a manner similar to the
'fireside chat.'" Al-Zawahiri advises people in Iraq and the
Palestinian territory, Mansfield said, and renews his call for young
men to join the jihad in Iraq and Afghanistan. Included is a video
clip of the late Sheikh Abdullah Azzam -- an extremist in Afghanistan
during the Soviet occupation -- reminding Muslims that jihad is their
responsibility. Al-Zawahiri also rebukes Fatah for battling Hamas in
the Palestinian territory, telling party members to "return to your
religion, your Islam, your honor and your Arabness." Last month, al-Zawahiri,
in an audiotaped message posted on several Islamist Web sites, voiced
his support for Hamas leaders who maintain control of Gaza after a
split with Fatah, a more moderate Palestinian faction. "We say to you,
now that you are in control of Gaza, you should remember two things:
One is that being in power is not a goal in itself, but the goal is,
rather, to implement the rule of Allah," al-Zawahiri said in that
audiotape, according to a CNN translation. "Two, this control is
incomplete and unstable, for the [Israeli] plans are being made to
invade Gaza. Unite with your mujahedeen brothers in Palestine and do
not stir up problems with them. "Unite your ranks with all of the
mujahedeen in the world for the upcoming battle [of Gaza] that I
expect the Egyptians and Saudis to participate in." The audiotaped
message was a reversal of al-Zawahiri's previous criticism of Hamas,
issued after its leaders agreed to form a unity government with Fatah
leaders. Hamas fighters wrested control of Gaza from Fatah security
forces two weeks ago, prompting Palestinian Authority President
Mahmoud Abbas, based in the West Bank, to replace the Hamas leadership
with an emergency government. Since then, the United States, the
European Union and Israel have agreed to release funds to the new
Palestinian government. The money had been frozen after Hamas won
legislative elections last year.
|
Islam |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | NewWorldOrder |
America
|
I place the NWO link here because of the perported writings of Albert
Pike in 1871 of the three world wars. The last of which is the current
war between the West and radical Islam. He writes, "The
Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the
differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the
political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be
conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and
political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other.
Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral,
spiritual and economical exhaustion…We shall unleash the
Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social
cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the
effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody
turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves
against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those
destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned
with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be
without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without
knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light
through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer,
brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation
will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow
the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and
exterminated at the same time." That adoration
will be directed at the man of sin, the antichrist as described in
Revelation 13:1-8, "And
I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the
sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns,
and upon his heads the name of blasphemy. And
the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as
the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority. And
I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly
wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast. And
they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and
they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is
able to make war with him? And there was given unto him a mouth
speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto
him to continue forty and two months. And he opened his mouth in
blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and
them that dwell in heaven. And it was given unto him to make war
with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him
over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations. And
all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not
written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of
the world." This will begin at the abomination of desolation,
when the man of sin declares himself to be god as described in
2 Thessalonians 2:1-4. So the ultimate goal of everything we see
happening in the world is all part of the plan to reveal Lucifer's
antichrist and cause worship of him as god rather than the One True
God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. It seem Albert Pike and his Masonic
and Illuminati network had been planning for this and now we are
seeing those plans come to fruition.
Mideast peace treaty possible this month, says expert Daily
Star Egypt (July 4, 2007) -
A meeting between the Quartet, the Palestinian Authority, and Israeli
leaders will take place in Egypt mid-July, announced EU foreign policy
chief Javier Solana. "Toward the middle of the month, we will
recuperate this initiative," he said. Political analyst from the Al
Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies Emad Gad told The
Daily Star Egypt
that he believed the countries were very close to negotiating
a peace treaty delineating a two-state solution “very close” to what
former PM Arafat was said to have been offered at the 2000 Camp David
meeting. He believes that “ ‘moderate’ Palestinians are ready to sign
a peace treaty with Israel.” While the Quartet meeting was postponed
from late June due to high tensions within the Palestinian
territories, Gad explains that the situation is very different now.
“It is looking positive in the West Bank,” he says, where Israel has
returned tax revenues to the Palestinian Authority and the EU has
resumed relations with the territory. Abbas is also supported by the
US, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Jordan. Abbas is actually stronger than
before, explains Gad, as he and his Fatah party no longer need to take
approval or agreement from Hamas, as was the case under their unity
government. “Hamas is now controlling Gaza only.” The meeting will
also represent former British PM Tony Blair’s first test as Middle
East envoy for the Quartet — composed of the European Union, Russia,
the United Nations and the United States. Despite being generally
considered pro-Israel, Abbas had welcomed Blair as the new
representative, saying the Arabs were ready to deal with Blair as
mideast negotiator. “Blair can play a positive role in convincing the
Palestinians and Israelis to negotiate,” says Gad. He explains that
Blair’s close ties to US President Bush put him in an advantageous
position, as the US is in a position to pressure the Israelis to
resume negotiations. |
Israel |
Islam |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | Solana
|
1st Seal |
There are two
sides to the Middle East position on Israel, the "radical" Islamic
side and the "moderate" Islamic side. As far as Bible prophecy goes, I
believe we are about to see the moderate and radical paths played out
in our near future. On the radical Islamic path, the
Magog invasion that is stopped with fire and brimstone from heaven
will soon play out when Israel is attacked by Russia, Turkey, Iran,
Libya, and others.
This is building now and the alliances are already in place. The
moderate side for peace between Islam and Israel will come to fruition
after that invasion fails, I believe. Israel won't cave in politically
as much as they do now and Islam will have a better idea of who
they're up against and will fake the peace game brought about through
the work of the European Union's push for peace in the Middle East. So
we have this mix of war and peace on the horizon that is eventually
going to end up with the rebuilding of the temple on the
Temple Mount and then later the
abomination of desolation that begins the
great tribulation.
Summer under a cloud as weather turns angry in London This
is London (July 4, 2007) -
Looming angrily over London, this is the massive cloud that brought
weather havoc to the capital. Within an hour, its devastating work was
done. Hailstones the size of marbles had battered Battersea and
flashfloods caused chaos in Clapham. Lightning lit up the blackened
sky. Taken from the 17th floor of the London Television Centre on the
South Bank, this stunning picture shows the enormity of the cloud that
heralded Tuesday's storms - the latest in this summer of dramatic
contrasts. Only four miles away the tennis at Wimbledon was rained off
yet again as the weather was blamed for a big fall in this year's
attendance. Two girls aged 13 and 15 were treated for serious burns
after being struck by lightning at the end of the school day at
Ipswich High School. The East of England Ambulance Service said the
strike had blown the girls' shoes apart. 'They were struck
simultaneously,' said a spokesman. 'They both had entry and exit
wounds on their arms and feet.' He said the girls, who remained
conscious throughout their ordeal, had not suffered life-threatening
injuries. The stormy start to July follows the third wettest June on
record. According to Met Office statistics, 105.3mm or 41ins of rain
fell last month. Only 1912 and 1982 were wetter. Moments after its
passing, the sunshine-was out again. Commuters battling-their way home
in the evening rush hour shook out soaking umbrellas and shrugged off
steaming raincoats. Nick Ricketts of the Met officesaid: 'There had
been an extended period of cold wet weather. When the sun finally
arrived, it warmed the surface temperature and that mix caused the
storms to begin.' Don't put away your umbrella (or sunscreen) just
yet. According to the weathermen, our mixed-up summer hasn't finished
with us. more
with pictures... |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
Earth Changes
|
'Europe Has Been Saved': Sarkozy Calls on EU to Do More EU
Business (July 2, 2007) -
Proclaiming "Europe has been saved" with a new treaty, French
President Nicolas Sarkozy called Monday on the EU to open debate on a
string of prickly issues, from borders to the euro. "Europe was in
danger, undermined by successive crises, undermined by public
distrust, undermined by doubt. I believe that today, Europe has been
saved," Sarkozy said in a major address in the eastern French city of
Strasbourg. The new treaty was agreed during marathon talks in
Brussels on June 23 to replace the constitution that was rejected by
French and Dutch voters two years ago, triggering a crisis within the
bloc. The treaty that is to be drafted by an intergovernmental
conference opening on July 23 will spell out the functions of EU
institutions and create a new post of EU president for a period of two
and half years, replacing the current system of six-month rotating
presidencies between member states. Sarkozy hailed the breakthrough as
the "renewal of the European spirit" and said the 27-nation bloc
should now set out to tackle major issues as part of a quest for
"renaissance." He also lambasted what he described as a "bureaucratic
Europe" caught up in meetings that served no purpose and producing
"eight-page communiques" of unintelligbile statements. The president,
who took over from Jacques Chirac in May, spoke as he prepared to
attend a meeting of eurozone finance ministers in Brussels on Monday
to present his plan to delay by two years to 2012 the target of a
balanced budget. On Monday, Portuguese Prime Minister Jose Socrates,
whose country holds the rotating EU presidency, said France could
expect a cool reception from finance ministers if it wants to change
the rules. "We need a very stringent budget policy and that applies
everywhere whether in Portugal or France or the other countries," said
Socrates. During his presidential campaign, Sarkozy repeatedly
attacked the strength of the euro and argued that governments of the
13-nation eurozone should have a say in the rate. "I want to open all
of the debates; I want to ask all of the questions and I want to raise
all of the problems," Sarkozy said of his presence at the Brussels
finance ministers meeting. He appealed for "a Europe that does not sit
idle while factories relocate and which does not accept the
dictatorship of the markets." Sarkozy said French businesses were the
victims of unfair competition from "countries that mock environmental
concerns, have no respect for social rights and practice tax dumping."
Alluding to Turkey's bid to join the European Union, Sarkozy called
for "a Europe that does not dilute itself by enlarging without end"
and said the bloc must debate the issue of borders to avoid becoming a
"sub-region of the United Nations." The president has run into
resistance from Portugal, which has just taken over the EU presidency
and served notice that it had its hands full with the drafting of the
new reform treaty. |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
Solana suggests Iran behind Gaza, Lebanon attacks
ABC News
(July 2, 2007) -
The European Union foreign policy chief suggested on Monday that Iran
could be linked to the Hamas military takeover of Gaza, recent attacks
on the Lebanese army, and on European peacekeepers in Lebanon. Javier
Solana, who has led efforts to bring Iran back to the negotiating
table over its nuclear programme, stopped short of blaming Tehran
outright, but said the incidents could not be treated separately.
"What happened in Gaza cannot be seen separately from what happened in
Lebanon," he told a conference on the Middle East hosted by the
Socialist group of the European Parliament. "There are new groups in
the Palestinian camps," Solana said. "And the fact that UNIFIL has
been attacked for the first time cannot be taken separately." Solana
said that while the car bomb attack that killed six Spanish members of
the U.N. Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) on June 24 was carried out
by "forces we don't know", he added: "It would be naive not to see
this as part of a global approach." "Somebody I know well --
Ali Larijani -- has said 'we are supporting Hamas'," he said,
referring to the chief Iranian nuclear negotiator, who made the
statement in an interview with Newsweek published last month. "All
this is connected," Solana said. "It didn't happen by accident
or miracle, it was probably planned." "It would be difficult to
understand without seeing other important regional players behind it,"
he added, referring to "other forces" in Iran and Syria. Solana also
said a postponed meeting of Western and Arab Middle East mediators
with Israeli and Palestinian leaders would probably now happen in
Cairo in mid-July. He said it was important to provide a new political
impetus to the peace process, not just financial and humanitarian aid
to the Palestinian government. Solana also said that in the long run
it would be necessary to have an international peacekeeping presence
in the West Bank and Gaza, but this was not an immediate priority.
| Iran
|
Islam
|
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom
|
Solana
|
In a follow-up to this story,
Solana's spokesperson denies western news agency report on Iran,
"The spokesperson of European Union foreign policy chief
Javier Solana dismissed Monday a western news agency report on
statements attributed to Solana as "wrong interpretation". "It is
wrong interpretation of what he said," Cristina Gallach told IRNA in
Brussels Monday evening. She was referring to a dispatch by the
British news agency Reuters from "Solana suggests Iran behind Gaza and
Lebanon attacks". "We don't deal with suggestions. We are not in a
business of suggestions. People take out sentences out of context to
spin," noted Gallach." You read what he
said above, what do you think he meant? Eventually when you try to
play both sides, you run into problems like this.
Quiet or they might wake up...The Totalitarian Tiptoe David
Icke Newsletter (July
1, 2007) -
It
is many years now since I coined the term 'The Totalitarian Tiptoe'
for the technique of step-by-step changes leading to a long-planned
goal. Each step is promoted as unconnected to all the others when in
fact they are fundamentally connected and all lead in the same
direction - centralised control. The idea of the Totalitarian Tiptoe
is to diffuse the opposition there would be if they went from A to Z
in one go. The change would be so great that heads would lift and eyes
would open to ask the question: 'What's going on?' By taking baby
steps, each change is sold as small and insignificant while the Shadow
People orchestrate the steps to become, taken together, giant strides
of change and imposition. There is no better example of this than the
European Union and this week came another blatant example of the
technique. This is also relevant to readers in the Americas, Asia,
Africa and Australia-New Zealand because the same is happening there
by the day. The European Union is only the precursor to four
superstates that are being tiptoed into place. The others are the
American Union (the North American Union - The United States,
Canada and Mexico - is now secretly well advanced); the African Union;
and the Asia-Pacific Union. These are designed to be the second tier
of global control under a world government. If the manipulators had
come clean and told the truth about these plans there would be have
been an outcry decades ago. They knew this and so it has all been done
on the sly, step by step. The major politicians of all major parties
say one thing in public while pursuing a very different path behind
the scenes. The most important public face of Britain's entry into the
European Community/Union was the child abuser and Conservative Party
Prime Minister, Edward Heath, who signed the treaty of membership in
1972. He told the people that the then European Economic Community, or
EEC, was just a free trade zone and not planned to be a
centrally-controlled United States of Europe. But while Heath was
saying 'it's only about free trade', a Foreign Office memo in 1971
warned: '... the Community is a process of fundamental political
importance implying progressive development towards a political
union'. This memo was suppressed for 30 years. In
fact, Heath was agreeing to British political union with Europe as far
back as April 1962 when he was Lord Privy Seal in the Conservative
government of Harold Macmillan. He told the Ministerial Council of the
Western European Union that '... you have decided that those who join
the Economic Communities as full members must also join the Political
Union. I am sure that this was the right decision' (Command Paper
1720). more...
|
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | NewWorldOrder |
America
|
It's kind of scary how much information about the hidden history of
politics is out there and where it is all leading. I can see how many
people could get a whiff of this information and disregard it, it's
part of our programming I think. The idea of "conspiracy" comes up and
we immediately relegate the information to the kook section of memory
to which we rarely go again. The more I understand Bible prophecy
though, and our timing in it, the less I feel like a kook for seeing
the possibility and the more blessed I feel to be led through
information supporting Bible prophecy in regard to a world that will
soon be controlled by the man of sin. The people have no power, even
when we vote because all those in power or rich and well-known enough
to get into power are all playing the same game with two faces. Given
the nearness of the fulfillment of Bible prophecy, I wouldn't be a
good watchman to remain silent. What can we do about it? Watch and
pray. Luke 21:34-36, "And take heed to
yourselves, lest at any time your hearts be overcharged with
surfeiting, and drunkenness, and cares of this life, and so that day
come upon you unawares. For
as a snare shall it come on all them that dwell on the face of the
whole earth. Watch
ye therefore, and pray always, that ye may be
accounted worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass,
and to stand before the Son of man."
Former Soviet Dissident Warns For EU Dictatorship
Unsealed Prophecy
(July 1, 2007) -
WOW! Has
Vladimir Bukovksy been reading the Bible? Don’t know if he
realizes it or not, but he is describing the EU in very much the
same way as Daniel does. Here is a part of an interview with
him:
Vladimir Bukovksy, the 63-year old former Soviet dissident,
fears that the European Union is on its way to becoming
another Soviet Union. In a speech he delivered in Brussels
last week Mr Bukovsky called the EU a “monster” that must be
destroyed, the sooner the better, before it develops into a
fullfledged totalitarian state.
Mr Bukovsky paid a visit to the European Parliament on
Thursday at the invitation of Fidesz, the Hungarian Civic
Forum. Fidesz, a member of the European Christian Democrat
group, had invited the former Soviet dissident over from
England, where he lives, on the occasion of this year’s 50th
anniversary of the 1956 Hungarian Uprising. After his morning
meeting with the Hungarians, Mr Bukovsky gave an afternoon
speech in a Polish restaurant in the Trier straat, opposite
the European Parliament, where he spoke at the invitation of
the United Kingdom Independence Party, of which he is a
patron.
An interview with Vladimir Bukovsky Paul Belien: You were a very famous Soviet dissident
and now you are drawing a parallel between the European Union
and the Soviet Union. Can you explain this?
Vladimir Bukovsky: I am referrring to
structures, to certain ideologies being instilled, to the
plans, the direction, the inevitable expansion, the
obliteration of nations, which was the purpose of the Soviet
Union. Most people do not understand this. They do not know
it, but we do because we were raised in the Soviet Union where
we had to study the Soviet ideology in school and at
university. The ultimate purpose of the Soviet Union was to
create a new historic entity, the Soviet people, all around
the globe. The same is true in the EU today. They are trying
to create a new people. They call this people “Europeans”,
whatever that means.
According to Communist doctrine as well as to many forms of
Socialist thinking, the state, the national state, is supposed
to wither away. In Russia, however, the opposite happened.
Instead of withering away the Soviet state became a very
powerful state, but the nationalities were obliterated. But
when the time of the Soviet collapse came these suppressed
feelings of national identity came bouncing back and they
nearly destroyed the country. It was so frightening.
PB: Do you think the same thing can happen
when the European Union collapses?
VB: Absolutely, you can press a spring
only that much, and the human psyche is very resilient you
know. You can press it, you can press it, but don’t forget it
is still accumulating a power to rebound. It is like a spring
and it always goes to overshoot.
PB: But all these countries that joined
the European Union did so voluntarily.
VB: No, they did not. Look at Denmark
which voted against the Maastricht treaty twice. Look at
Ireland [which voted against the Nice treaty]. Look at many
other countries, they are under enormous pressure. It is
almost blackmail. Switzerland was forced to vote five times in
a referendum. All five times they have rejected it, but who
knows what will happen the sixth time, the seventh time. It is
always the same thing. It is a trick for idiots. The people
have to vote in referendums until the people vote the way that
is wanted. Then they have to stop voting. Why stop? Let us
continue voting. The European Union is what Americans would
call a shotgun marriage.
PB: What do you think young people should
do about the European Union? What should they insist on, to
democratize the institution or just abolish it?
VB: I think that the European Union, like
the Soviet Union, cannot be democratized. Gorbachev tried to
democratize it and it blew up. This kind of structures cannot
be democratized.
PB: But we have a European Parliament
which is chosen by the people.
VB: The European Parliament is elected on
the basis of proportional representation, which is not true
representation. And what does it vote on? The percentage of
fat in yoghurt, that kind of thing. It is ridiculous. It is
given the task of the Supreme Soviet. The average MP can speak
for six minutes per year in the Chamber. That is not a real
parliament.
And here is what Daniel had to say more than 2000 years back:
Dan 7:7-8 After this I saw in the night-visions, and, behold, a fourth
beast, terrible and powerful, and strong exceedingly; and it had great iron
teeth; it devoured and brake in pieces, and stamped the residue with its feet:
and it was diverse from all the beasts that were before it; and it had ten
horns. I considered the horns, and, behold, there came up among them another
horn, a little one, before which three of the first horns were plucked up by the
roots: and, behold, in this horn were eyes like the eyes of a man, and a mouth
speaking great things.
|
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | NewWorldOrder |
EU pours £3.8bn into 'brainwashing campaign' UK
Telegraph (July 2007)
-
The European Union is spending £3.8 billion a year on
"propaganda" to win over its sceptical citizens, it is claimed.
As well as publishing a plethora of pamphlets and
employing an army of public relations staff, the EU has spent hundreds of
millions of pounds on teaching aids, school trips and even cartoons. According
to Lee Rotherham, the author of a new book which examines the EU's spending on
its image, such initiatives are an "outrageous and cynical attempt to brainwash
the young". The Europa Diary, a gift from the EU to schoolchildren, is one
example cited by Mr Rotherham in Hearts & Minds: the Tax-funded PR Campaign to
Make us Love Brussels. The diary has been sent to 1.2 million pupils in more
than 9,000 schools across Europe. Its calendar includes pages that describe the
European Parliament as "the people's voice" and claims that the EU has "improved
the quality of people's everyday lives". A
version of the diary sent to Dutch schools describes the European Parliament as
the "most important multi-national organ in the world". Let's Explore Europe
Together, an online teaching aid aimed at nine to 12-year-olds, describes the EU
as a "really good plan that had never been tried before". The European
Parliament has also funded a cartoon called Operation Red
Dragon, featuring a daring, fictitious MEP, Elisa Correr, who becomes
"embroiled in a risky and fascinating adventure while in pursuit of her
parliamentary activities". She dodges assassins, hunts down a general who broke
an arms embargo, and still has time to debate copyright law in Brussels. The
text admits: "European Parliamentarians do not generally lead such dangerous
lives ... nevertheless you can learn about the work of an MEP and other European
institutions from the story." |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | NewWorldOrder |
For more on this campaign, see
the video
supporting
European films by the EU.
The
video is not appropriate subject matter for children and is of a
sexual nature. Which is why I find it
telling.
Blair not to mediate in Middle East, Solana says M&C
News (June 29, 2007)
- Middle East quartet envoy Tony Blair
will not be charged with mediating in the Middle East conflict, but
with channelling aid towards the construction of a Palestinian state,
European Union foreign policy chief Javier Solana was Friday quoted as
saying. Former British Premier Blair, whose appointment has been met
with skepticism in parts of the region, will not conduct a peace
process, the Spanish daily El Pais quoted Solana as saying in Lisbon.
Blair's task will be to mobilize political and economic aid, 'will and
solidarity' to create a government structure for a Palestinian state,
Solana explained. The current situation in the Palestinian
territories, with the confrontation between Fatah and Hamas, did not
make Blair's task easy, Solana added. |
Israel |
Islam |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | Solana
|
1st Seal |
Blair prepares to say hasta la vista to No 10 The
Herald (June 26, 2007)
- Tony Blair will hold his last official foreign talks today plus his
final press conference as Prime Minister when he welcomes ex-film star
Arnold Schwarzenegger, the governor of California, to Downing Street.
The breakfast meeting with the "Governator" at No 10, primarily on
climate change, is expected to come just hours before Mr Blair's
appointment as a special envoy to the Middle East is confirmed by a
meeting of representatives from the Quartet - the UN, US, EU and
Russia - in Jerusalem. Yesterday, when the Prime Minister's spokesman
was asked about Mr Blair's appointment, he refused to deny it, saying
only: "Let's not get ahead of ourselves." One source close to the Quartet said:
"Blair's appointment has been 150% approved. The Jerusalem meeting is
all about arranging the logistics, making final arrangements and
getting the announcement out." The prime mover behind the PM's
appointment has been American President George W Bush with support
from Ehud Olmert, the Israeli premier. Given Mr Blair's central role
in the Iraq war, the prospect of his appointment has raised eyebrows
in certain quarters, though it is thought Vladimir Putin, the Russian
president, has decided not to object. Javier Solana,
the EU's high representative on foreign affairs, is believed to be
unhappy at Mr Blair's appointment because it could distract
from his own role in the region. However,
diplomats have insisted the PM's new role will focus on Palestine and
will not directly involve talks between the Palestinian Authority and
the Israeli government. more...
|
Israel | EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | Solana
|
1st Seal |
No Surprise
Fulfilled Prophecy (June 25, 2007)
- The news that EU leaders, on Saturday, approved a "Reform Treaty" to
replace the failed EU constitution -- and, with it, approved a foreign
minister post -- is no surprise to those who've followed FP. Herb's
reporting had anticipated these increased EU powers. What also will be
no surprise is if the foreign minister post goes to Javier Solana --
making this already powerful leader much more powerful (despite the
startling fact that many people in the world still don't know who this
man is). Of course, the word "Constitution" has been abandoned for
"Reform Treaty" and the foreign minister post will now be called "High
Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy."
But the main points of the constitution -- and the job description for
the foreign minister post -- have remained intact. The name changes
were made to alleviate fears that a European superstate is on the
rise. Yesterday, in the U.K. Telegraph, an alarmed Neil O'Brien
(director of the Open Europe think-tank) wrote: "Anyone reading what
has been agreed in Brussels this weekend will quickly realise that the
'new' treaty is merely the EU constitution with another name."
I encourage you to read O'Brien's article here. The EU's habit of
changing words to mask its true actions had often been noted by Herb.
Besides calling for the appointment of a foreign policy chief, the
Reform Treaty calls for the appointment of a permanent EU Council
president (to replace the six-month rotating presidency). The treaty
will allow the EU to enter into treaties as if it were a single
country. It also gives the European Court of Justice along with
Europol (the EU's police force) greater powers over Member States.
(Britain has reportedly received exemption from certain aspects of the
treaty, including exemption from cooperation in police and criminal
matters and from the Charter of Fundamental Rights.) And Member States
will have less veto power over EU decisions. The treaty also allows
for future amendments, which O'Brien fears will allow the EU to give
itself even more powers. But O'Brien and other critics are especially
frightened about the creation of the foreign policy post, which will
combine Solana's current position as the "High Representative for the
Common Foreign and Security Policy" in the Council of the European
Union with the vice president of the European Commission -- giving
Solana (or whoever fills this post) significantly more powers and
control of the EU's external aid budget. This person will represent
the EU to the world. The EU heads are hurriedly drafting the text of
the Reform Treaty, so they can sign it by December and then put it up
for vote to the 27 Member States. Their goal is for it to go
into effect in 2009. What does all this mean? It means
the European Union is continuing to appear to meet the description of
the Revived Roman Empire that the Bible foretold would arise before
Christ's return. And, within the European Union, a job description is
continuing to be created with the type of powers the prophesied
Antichrist will have. |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | Solana
| As I've been pointing out, there
seems to be much converging on the 2009/2010 timeframe that will shift
the governments of the world and the power structure and how the
nations relate to each other financially, legally, and
technologically. Given the timing of the abomination of desolation in
February 2009 according to the
HIStory, Our Future Bible studies, the fact that Europe is
pushing through these changes to give power to the Foreign Policy
Chief to go into effect in 2009 is certainly an interesting
coincidence if nothing else. I don't believe in coincidence though,
especially given the extreme quantity of "coincidences" I have
discovered since studying Bible prophecy.
Sarkozy Takes Center Stage in Europe New
York Times (June 25, 2007)
- The new French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, has reasserted his
country’s traditional role at the diplomatic heart of Europe by
emerging as the main force behind a deal that brought the European
Union back from the brink of crisis. Mr.
Sarkozy proved to be the crucial figure during a fractious meeting,
displaying a hyperactive style that helped break down the resistance
of Poland’s unyielding leaders. Though scheduled only for Thursday and
Friday, the meeting of European leaders ran into Saturday, with
agreement clinched around 4:30 a.m. Poland and Britain had demanded
significant changes to the treaty aimed at rewriting a European
Constitution that was rejected in referendums in France and the
Netherlands in 2005. Prime Minister Tony Blair of Britain was
determined to win concessions he considered vital to convince the
British public that the treaty was fundamentally different from the
defunct constitution. That would allow him to argue that, unlike the
Constitution, it does not require a referendum, which he had promised
the voters. But the real obstacles to a deal were Lech Kaczynski, the
Polish president, who attended the meeting, and his twin brother,
Jaroslaw, the prime minister, who stayed behind in Warsaw. Unlike Mr.
Blair, who simply wanted concessions, the Poles challenged a central
element of the proposal, its voting system. On Thursday night, Mr.
Sarkozy set the scene for a dramatic debut when he addressed the news
media. Holding a microphone like a stand-up comic and banning
television cameras from the briefing room, his studied informality was
a sharp contrast to his sometimes austere predecessor, Jacques Chirac.
more... |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | As one
of the nations of the 10 voting member-states of the WEU, the new
leadership in France is placing the ratification of the European
constitution at the top of the agenda. Part of the purpose of this is
to bring about further powers for the voice of Europe, Mr. Europe.
That position is currently held by Javier Solana. There were three
nations that rejected the constitution originally. Now all three are
trying to turn their nations' positions around. Keep watching!
'How spin muddies EU foreign policy debate
BBC News (June 24, 2007) - Any
analysis of the effects on EU foreign policy of the proposed new
treaty has to pick its way through a morass of spin and
exaggeration. The treaty will allow some limited but quite important
steps towards the encouragement of joint policies in foreign affairs
and certainly towards the clearer presentation of those policies.
But the giant leap has not been taken. Foreign policy will still be
subject to unanimity in all but a few limited areas. The upgraded
"high representative" will have a greater ability to carry out
policy, but will not make policy. There is no intention of allowing
in foreign affairs what happens, without complaint, in trade policy,
where the EU has to act by law as one, decisions are taken by
qualified majority vote and considerable freedom is given to the
commissioner for trade. So decisions such as the British one to join
the invasion of Iraq will still be possible in future. Yet to listen
to the British government before the talks was to hear cries of
alarm that British independence was threatened and afterwards that
such a threat had been triumphantly averted. One wondered why the
government had previously agreed to the proposals if they were now
seen as such a threat. On the other side, the anti-EU critics were
also crying disaster, and in their case the cries are continuing.
The most significant change will be to combine the jobs of the
existing high representative for foreign and security policy and the
external affairs commissioner. This gives the new high
representative (the title "foreign minister" was dropped due to
British sensitivities) a seat on the European Commission and the
foreign aid cash with which to put money where the policy is. The
representative will also chair meetings of the foreign ministers and
control a potentially powerful new EU diplomatic service. So he or
she (it will probably be a he, in that the present
representative Javier Solana is likely to get the enhanced job when it is established in 2009) will have a bigger
profile internationally. There will also be a permanent President of
the European Council, the body made up of heads of state and
government. This post will also give the EU a larger presence on the
world stage. Do not underestimate the influence of that. more... |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | Solana
|
A new road map for Europe Herald
Tribune (June 24, 2007) -
The revamped treaty hammered out by European leaders at a marathon
summit meeting here will rescue the bloc from its current existential
crisis. But the "United States of Europe" envisioned by the EU's
founding fathers is dead and Europe's ability to act as a unified
power on the world stage remains in doubt. In the short term, the deal
will help bring to an end two years of drift that have plagued the
bloc since the French and the Dutch rejected the proposed constitution
two years ago. The period has been marked by the reassertion of the
nation state, as governments increasingly bypassed Brussels while a
discredited union grappled with institutional questions and abandoned
its grand projects. With a road map for its future in hand, a newly
empowered union should be able to take a larger global leadership role
and become a more equal partner with Washington on issues ranging from
the Middle East, a newly assertive Russia and energy security.
The creation of a more powerful EU foreign
policy chief to represent the bloc internationally should also help Europe to better speak with
one voice, making it
clearer than ever whom Washington needs to call when, as Henry
Kissinger once put it, it "wants to speak to Europe."
Tony Blair, the departing prime minister of Britain, said the deal
gave Europe the chance to put its internal distractions behind it and
to grapple with the larger problems of the world. "This deal gives us
a chance to move on," he said. "It gives us a chance to concentrate on
the issues to do with the economy, organized crime, terrorism,
immigration, defense, climate change, the environment, energy - the
problems that really concern citizens in Europe."
more... |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
Secularist Europe Silences Pro-Lifers and Creationists
Brussels Journal (June
23, 2007) - Last week, a German court sentenced a
55-year old Lutheran pastor to one year in jail for “Volksverhetzung”
(incitement of the people) because he compared the killing of the
unborn in contemporary Germany to the holocaust. Next week, the
Council of Europe is going to vote on a resolution imposing Darwinism
as Europe’s official ideology. The European governments are asked to
fight the expression of
creationist opinions, such as
young earth
and intelligent
design theories. According to the Council of Europe these theories
are “undemocratic” and “a threat to human rights.” Without legalized
abortion the number of German children would increase annually by at
least 150,000 – which is the number of legal abortions in birth dearth
Germany. Pastor Johannes Lerle compared the killing of the unborn to
the killing of the Jews in Auschwitz during the Second World War. On
14 June, a court in
Erlangen ruled that, in doing so, the pastor had “incited the
people” because his statement was a
denial of the holocaust
of the Jews in Nazi-Germany. Hence, Herr Lerle was
sentenced to one year
in jail. Earlier, he had already spent eight months in jail for
calling abortionists “professional killers” – an allegation which the
court ruled to be slanderous because, according to the court, the
unborn are not humans. Other German courts convicted pro-lifers for
saying that “in abortion clinics, life unworthy of living is being
killed,” because this terminology evoked Hitler’s euthanasia program,
which used the same language. In 2005, a German pro-lifer, Günter
Annen, was
sentenced
to 50 days in jail for saying “Stop unjust [rechtswidrige]
abortions in [medical] practice,” because, according to the court, the
expression “unjust” is understood by laymen as meaning illegal, which
abortions are not. Volksverhetzung is a crime which the Nazis
often invoked against their enemies and which contemporary Germany
also uses to
intimidate homeschoolers. Soon, the German authorities will be
able to use the same charge against people who question Darwin’s
evolution theory. Indeed, next Tuesday, the
Council of Europe (CoE), Europe’s
main human-rights body, will vote on a proposal which advocates the
fight against creationism, “young earth” and “intelligent design” in
its
47 member
states.
more... |
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
EU leaders to draft new treaty CNews (June
23, 2007) - European Union leaders agreed early
Saturday on a "precise mandate" to draft a streamlined constitution
that will guide and govern the expanded EU. All 27 members -
including Poland, which had staged fierce opposition to the proposed
treaty - agreed after two days of arduous talks on guidelines to
drafting a new constitution, French President Nicolas Sarkozy said.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who chaired the marathon talks, said
the deal "represents a significant step forward for the European
Union." Sarkozy joined Merkel in calling the agreement "very good news
for Europe." And Polish President Lech Kaczynski said he, too, was
pleased with the outcome. "I am very happy ... we did not have to
swallow any bitter pills," he said. "The position of Poland is
definitely stronger under this system." Merkel had made it a priority
of her country's six-month EU presidency to come up with a viable plan
for a treaty to replace the now-defunct EU charter that Dutch and
French voters rejected two years ago. She sought to salvage key parts
of the stalled constitution necessary to streamline EU decisionmaking,
including overhauling the unwieldy EU voting system and giving the EU
more power in policing. Merkel said Saturday that she was happy
leaders were able to keep key parts of the previous charter alive,
despite the often deep and acrimonious divisions between that tested
the bloc's unity. "This shows that Europe came together at the end,"
she said. more... |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
Blair and Pope discuss Iraq Sunday
Sun (June 23, 2007) - Tony
Blair and the Pope discussed Iraq and global poverty in the final
foreign engagement of the Prime Minister's "farewell tour". Mr Blair
flew straight from fraught all-night discussions over the new EU
treaty in Brussels for an hour-long audience with the Pontiff in Rome.
Downing Street said the two men had "positive" talks, and the outgoing
Premier presented Benedict XVI with a portrait of 19th century
theologian Cardinal Newman. "The discussions focused on the
Middle East, international development and interfaith issues,"
a spokesman said. The spokesman would not comment on whether the Pope
had expressed concern about the situation in Iraq - as he did during
talks with US President George Bush earlier this month - or if the
subject of Mr Blair's widely-predicted conversion to Catholicism had
been broached. Meanwhile, the Premier-in-waiting, Gordon Brown, warmly
endorsed the idea of Mr Blair acting as a Middle East envoy for the
major powers in future. He praised Mr Blair's skills at bringing about
"reconciliation", and said he still had a "great contribution to make"
on the international stage. The White House has indicated it would
support Mr Blair carrying out diplomatic missions in the troubled
region for the powerful Quartet of the US, the UN, Russia and Europe.
Asked what he thought of the prospect, Mr Brown told BBC1's Politics
Show: "Tony Blair has a great knowledge both of reconciliation, and
how to make it happen as we found from Northern Ireland, and a great
interest in the areas we were just talking about." Sources in the PM's
camp indicated that he would be making a major announcement on his
post-Downing Street plans when he officially stands down on Wednesday.
|
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
UN Human Rights Council to Absolve Cuba and Belarus; Israel Facing
Permanent Indictment UN Watch
(June 17, 2007)
- Dictators Fidel Castro of Cuba and Alexander
Lukashenko of Belarus will be celebrating the UN Human Rights
Council's likely adoption tomorrow of a new reform package that will
see both regimes dropped from a blacklist, while Israel is placed
under permanent indictment. Contrary to all the promises of
reform issued last year, the proposal released today by Council
President Luis Alfonso de Alba targets Israel for permanent indictment
under a special agenda item: "Human
rights situation in Palestine and other occupied Arab territories,"
which includes "Human rights violations and implications of the
Israeli occupation of Palestine and other occupied Arab territories";
and "Right to self-determination of the Palestinian people." No other
situation in the world is singled out -- not genocide in Sudan, not
child slavery in China, nor the persecution of democracy dissidents in
Egypt and elsewhere. Moreover, the council's one-sided investigative
mandate of "Israeli violations of international law" is the only one
without a set term, to be renewed "until the end of the occupation."
As the same time, the proposal eliminates the experts charged with
reporting on violations by Cuba and Belarus, despite the latest
reports of massive violations by both regimes. As for the experts on
other countries -- on Burundi, Cambodia, North Korea, Democratic
Republic of Congo, Haiti, Liberia, Burma, Somalia and Sudan -- all of
these may soon be eliminated, as threatened by the council's majority
of dictatorships and other Third World countries, under a gradual
"review" process. Pending their fate, all experts will be subjected to
a new "Code of Conduct," submitted by Algeria in the name of the
African group, designed to intimidate and restrict the independence of
the human rights experts. The complete package is expected to be
adopted by consensus tomorrow—unless the governments of Canada and
other Western democracies uphold principle by opposing the
entrenchment of bias as a permanent feature of the new council.
more...
|
Israel
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
Shocking Truth Uncovered about U.N. Taxation Plan
pdf - Powerful
international organizations and personalities, including the United
Nations and left-wing billionaire oligarch George Soros, are promoting
global taxes that would extract trillions of dollars from the American
people. In violation of the letter and spirit of the so-called
"Helms-Biden" U.N. "reform" law, which was passed by the U.S. Congress
to prohibit the world body from promoting or adopting international
taxes, the U.N. has prepared a book, New Sources of Development
Finance, advocating global taxes on the American people. The book
suggests global environmental taxes and a global currency tax that
would affect the international investments of ordinary Americans.
According to journalist Steven Solomon, a former staff reporter at
Forbes, such a proposal, known as the Tobin Tax, "might net some $13
trillion a year..."
more...
|
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | NewWorldOrder |
America
|
The
Secret Agenda Behind the Law of the Sea Treaty pdf -
The Bush Administration supports Senate ratification of the Law of the
Sea Treaty (UNCLOS), a measure so extreme that former U.S. Ambassador
to the U.N. Jeane Kirkpatrick said that it was viewed as the
cornerstone of a Marxist-oriented New International Economic Order (NIEO).
This was conceived as a scheme to transfer money and technology from
the U.S. and other developed countries to the Third World. Kirkpatrick
strongly opposed ratification of UNCLOS. The elements of a world
government could be put in place if UNCLOS, described as the most
comprehensive treaty ever and a “Constitution of the Oceans,” is
ratified and implemented. At a time when conservatives and Republicans
are raising concerns about activist judges on the national level who
cite international law and foreign rulings in their opinions, UNCLOS
will open the U.S. up to international lawsuits and climate change
litigation, providing a back door for implementation of the unratified
and costly global warming treaty. more...
|
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | NewWorldOrder |
America |
Envoys from Mideast Quartet to meet in Jerusalem on Tuesday Haaretz (June 22,
2007) - Envoys from the Quartet of Middle
East peace brokers are to meet in Jerusalem on Tuesday, a day after
Olmert and Abbas are due to attend a summit in Egypt. Miri Eisin, a spokeswoman for Olmert,
said "low-level officials" from the United States, European Union,
United Nations and Russia would meet. Sources in Jerusalem said the
attendees would be special envoys rather than ministers. Olmert is set to announce the release of
frozen Palestinian tax funds as part of a "package of gestures" in the
regional summit in Sharm el-Sheikh, diplomats and Israeli officials
said Friday. Sergei Yakovlev, a Russian Foreign Ministry envoy for
Middle East peacemaking, said the envoys "will discuss the situation
in the region, the talks for the Quartet and plans of action for the
future," Russia's Interfax news agency reported. A higher-level
meeting of officials from the Quartet - the United States, the
European Union, Russia and the United Nations - was to have taken
place Monday in Egypt. But that session was delayed to allow Quartet
officials time to assess changes in the region after Hamas' violent
takeover of the Gaza Strip last week. There has been no official
announcement from the Quartet of the planned meeting, but in Moscow, a
Russian envoy said the meeting would take place. Yakovlev said the
envoys will discuss the situation in the region, the talks for the
Quartet and plans of action for the future, Interax reported. Peace
efforts have been complicated by the emergence of a two Palestinian
entities, one ruled by Hamas in Gaza and the other by Fatah in the
West Bank. But moderate regional leaders have been quick to use this
development to promote peacemaking between Israel and moderate
Palestinians in the West Bank. |
Israel |
Islam |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | Solana
|
1st Seal |
EU Leaders Agree On Foreign Chief Reuters (June 22,
2007) - European Union leaders reached
broad agreement on Friday on a single post to run EU foreign affairs,
the first success at a summit on the bloc's future, but Poland held up
progress towards a treaty to reform the Union. The leaders of the 27
member states agreed on the job title, role and powers of a High
Representative of the European Union for foreign policy, defense and
security, diplomats said. The post will combine the jobs of foreign
policy chief Javier Solana, who does mostly crisis management, and
External Relations Commissioner Benita Ferrero-Waldner, who controls
the executive European Commission's aid budget. The new
foreign policy chief would chair
meetings of EU foreign ministers and head a combined external action
service drawing on both national and EU diplomats,
after Britain dropped its reservations on those
points, the diplomats said. The provisional accord was reached
on the second day of a crucial summit meant to launch negotiations on
a treaty to reform the bloc's institutions, replacing the defunct EU
constitution and helping the bloc face up to global challenges. German
Chancellor Angela Merkel, hosting the summit, struggled to break
Poland's resistance to planned changes to the bloc's voting system
which Warsaw says would favor member states with larger populations
and reduce its own influence. Merkel met Polish President Lech
Kaczynski three times in 12 hours to try to ease his concerns. "We're
working hard. The problems are not yet solved but everyone is trying,"
said Merkel, who also met the leaders of the other states with
concerns over the treaty -- Britain, the Czech Republic and the
Netherlands. Finnish President Tarja Halonen said she sensed progress.
"I would say the atmosphere was today better...I am more optimistic
now than I was this morning," she told reporters. Danish Prime
Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen said a lot of hard talking lay ahead:
"I still believe in an agreement but it will be a long negotiation." more...
|
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | Solana
|
Envoy: Iran open to nuclear compromise Reuters (June 22,
2007) - Iran
is ready to provide answers on past suspicious nuclear activities to
the International Atomic Energy Agency
within the next few months,
the agency's head said Friday after meeting with the country's top
nuclear negotiator. But the Iranian official suggested the offer was
conditional to an end of U.N. Security Council involvement in Iran's nuclear program. The
council has already imposed two sets of sanctions on the Islamic
republic over the past half year for its refusal to freeze uranium
enrichment and is poised to impose new penalties. Such terms would
likely be unacceptable to the five permanent council members plus
Germany — the six powers that have spearheaded the
effort to pressure Iran to give up its enrichment ambitions. The
Security Council has demanded that Iran provide answers to the IAEA,
the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog, on activities that could be linked to a
weapons program. But it has also called on Iran to freeze enrichment
and stop building a heavy water reactor that will produce plutonium —
like enriched uranium a material that could provide the fissile core
of nuclear warheads. With the main emphasis on blunting the possible
nuclear threat from Iran by depriving it of technologies that could be
used for such weapons, any concession that falls short of suspending
both enrichment and construction of the reactor was unlikely to be far
reaching enough. more...
|
Iran |
Gog/Magog | EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
If I remember correctly, Iran has already promised to reveal to the
world what they're doing and it seems they keep pushing it back.
Sounds like they're biding their time... but what could they be
planning? I think Israel may catch wind of their plans soon through
Syria, prompting the destruction of Damascus placing the hooks in the
jaws of Iran, Russia, and Turkey. We shall see soon enough. Events
cannot keep snowballing without some kind of release and war is the
word whispered throughout the Middle East. Radical Islam has declared
it, Israel has tried to ignore it in talks for peace, but I believe
them. Moreover, God's Word says they will attack Israel in Ezekiel
38,39. And when that happens, Christians around the world need to be
prepared to declare the glory of God and make the world aware of the
prophecy fulfilled. From there I believe we will see the temple
rebuilt in Jerusalem. Things will be much clearer to those watching
then. I think we're about to have it clarified for us, keep watching!
Polish PM fears there may be no EU compromise Reuters (June 22,
2007) - Polish Prime Minister Jaroslaw
Kaczynski said on Friday he feared there may be no
compromise at a European Union summit on a treaty to reform the bloc's
institutions. Speaking live on Polish television as his twin brother,
President Lech Kaczynski, was presenting Warsaw's response to a German
presidency compromise proposal in Brussels,
he said: "We have hit a wall." "The lack of any willingness to back
down is very clear on the side of our partners and I am afraid there
may be no way out...I am very sorry about that," he said. Poland
was and still is ready to compromise but "one
cannot give way all the time," he added. A senior aide to the prime
minister was quoted as saying Poland could not accept the compromise
on the voting system that was on the table but he did not exclude
further negotiation. "The Polish side cannot accept the proposals,
what is now on the negotiating table," Andrzej Sados, a minister in
the prime minister's office, told the PAP news agency. The Polish
president gave Poland's response in Brussels to German Chancellor
Angela Merkel,
chairing a summit of the 27-nation bloc already into its second day.
EU diplomats in Brussels said the comments did not signal a breakdown
in the negotiations but appeared to be tactical rather than Warsaw's
last word. more... |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
Sarkozy Could be Key Player at EU Summit Haaretz (June 21,
2007) - France's President Sarkozy heads
to summit talks on Thursday, eager to overcome two years of crisis
caused by a French rejection of a constitution for the bloc. He could
prove a valuable ally to German Chancelor Merkel. Leaders of the European Union's 27 member
states hope the two-day summit in Brussels will clear the way for a
simplified treaty to replace the doomed constitution, blocked by
French and Dutch referendums in 2005. It is Sarkozy's first European summit
since he was elected president on May 6, promising a major diplomatic
drive to break the EU's insitutional deadlock. Sarkozy told lawmakers from his
right-wing ruling party Wednesday he was expecting "two very difficult
days starting tomorrow, since what is at stake is nothing less than
pulling Europe out of immobility." For the past month, Sarkozy has
been engaged in telephone diplomacy and meetings from Warsaw to Madrid
to boost the chances of an agreement this week. He has also held
consultations with French political leaders of all stripes --
including with far-right leader Jean-Marie Le Pen, normally a pariah
in French politics -- before heading to the negotiating table in
Brussels. Germany, which holds the EU's presidency until the end of
the month, hopes member states will adopt a text outlining the
treaty's contents, and setting a mandate for an intergovernmental
conference to hammer out a final version. Sarkozy's spokesman said
Tuesday the French president was determined "to support the German
presidency as much as possible" and to "do everything to contribute to
its success." more... |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
EU leaders hold tense summit Associated
Press (June
19, 2007) - Poland
and Britain threatened Thursday to exercise their vetoes to prevent
plans to draft a watered-down EU treaty at a European Union Summit,
with Warsaw
demanding more voting rights and London
refusing to cede some powers to Brussels.
British Prime Minister Tony Blair said he would reject any treaty that
is similar to the draft constitution French and Dutch voters rejected
two years ago. Blair, attending his last international summit before
stepping down next week after a decade in power, was discussing
Britain's demands for the treaty with his successor, Treasury chief
Gordon Brown,
before heading to the two-day summit. In Warsaw, Polish Prime Minister
Jaroslaw Kaczynski
said the plan proposed by German Chancellor Angela Merkel,
the summit host, remains a problem. "The situation still does not
satisfy us," Kaczynski told the Polish Rzeczpospolita daily as his
twin brother, President Lech Kaczynski, headed to Brussels. "We should
do everything to push through our proposal or to obtain some other
solution that would equally satisfy our ambitions," the Polish prime
minister said. "Either we obtain that, or there will be a veto." The
EU is considering a voting system that takes into account each
country's population. But Kaczynski has said Poland wants compensation
for the deaths it suffered during World War II,
when Nazi Germany invaded. He argues that his country would be a much
larger country now if not for the war. Luxembourg
Prime Minister Jean-Claude Juncker
dismissed such demands as absurd. "I don't find it appropriate
that some Poles think it would be necessary to restrict Germany,"
Juncker said. "I can only warn against such irrational comments."
Slovakia's Prime Minister Robert Fico
warned against bringing up sensitive issues such as the voting
system already the subject of drawn-out discussions. "If we allow the
discussion on a change of the voting rules, it will open a whole range
of other issues. If somebody will want to push through things above
and over what has been agreed, we will not agree on anything," Fico
said. more...
|
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
Israel on the Brink, Again The
Conservative Voice (June
19, 2007) -
Last summer we saw a bungled war between Israel and Hezbollah that
ended in a stalemate, which is not what Israel intended when it began.
Israeli Prime Minister, Ehud Olmert sounded like he meant business
when he declared that Hezbollah would be driven out of Lebanon. But
Israel made the same mistake as we continue to make in Iraq. We are
allowing too much concern for civilian casualties to interfere with
winning the war. This is a mistake that neither Israel nor the US has
learned to avoid, I'm sorry to say. To make things worse, Olmert gave
the Gaza Strip to the Palestinians as a “peace offering.” He should
have known better and we can only hope that he learned a lesson from
it. Today, Gaza is now a threat to Israel’s very survival and any
responsible leader should have seen this coming. Anything you give to
Palestinians, they will take but instead of saying “thank you” they
only demand more. Sound familiar? Things were kind of ok there for a
while as long as President Mahmoud Abbas’s Fatah party was holding the
guns and could control the militias. But the rivalry between Abbas and
the democratically elected representatives of Hamas continued to heat
up ever since the election in January, 2006. Hamas is not a political
party. It is a terrorist organization which pretended to be a
political party for the election. But let’s make one thing clear.
Fatah party members are just as responsible for terrorism on Israel as
is Hamas, if not more. It’s hard to know which is worse, but Fatah is
considered a little more moderate and willing to work for peace.
Hamas, on the other hand, has but one goal - the obliteration of
Israel. Neither one is a friend to the US or Israel. In Gaza, over the
past couple of weeks, fighting between Fatah and Hamas militias has
reached the boiling point. Fatah soldiers have been killed or driven
out of Gaza, leaving the entire region in the hands of Hamas. During
the takeover, stockpiles of American weapons supplied to Fatah were
seized by Hamas as were critical CIA records covering CIA activities
in the Middle East and tactics to defeat the radicals. This Friday,
Abbas dissolved the Palestinian government, kicked Hamas out of
Parliament, and appointed a new Prime Minister who is currently
without a cabinet. Fatah is the old Yasir Arafat P.L.O. party. Now the
western media is naively asking “How is Hamas going to govern in Gaza
when they don’t have access to government money and resources?” Do
they really think Hamas took Gaza so they could “govern” it? Hamas’s
only concern for governing consists of giving free stuff to the poor,
just like the American Democrat Party does, for the purpose of holding
their support. They have renamed Gaza to “Hamasistan”. Hamas doesn’t
care about Gaza but it does put them in a valuable strategic position
to attack Israel from the south. I’m sure they won’t have any trouble
getting money from Iran and Syria which is where they get their
weapons, except of course, the ones they just got from America. The
media is calling this a “civil war” but I think it’s much more than
that, just as Iraq is much more than a civil war. Now that they have
Gaza, Hamas intends to take the West Bank as well which, will put them
within shooting range of Tel Aviv. The Bush Administration is sending
reinforcements to Fatah troops in the West Bank which so far have been
holding off Hamas fighters. The question to be asked is should the US
be taking sides and sending more arms to either Palestinian side?
Considering what happened with them in Gaza, I don’t think so. A
second shipment is under consideration. A little further north, Syrian
troops have been gathering on the border in the Golan Heights and
conducting war games to pass the time while they wait - for what? Just
to their west in Lebanon, Hezbollah has recovered from last year’s
war. They have rebuilt their tunnels along the northern Israeli border
and stocked them with from 20,000 to 25,000 Russian made Kasam,
Katusha and “tank buster” rockets. And all of this was done right
under the watchful eyes of the UN peacekeepers planted there last year
for the expressed purpose of preventing it. Is there really any
question about whose side the UN is on? more... |
Iran |
Gog/Magog |
Israel |
Islam |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | America
| This article is a good overview of
the latest events that I believe will lead up to the Gog/Magog
invasion. Read the whole article.
In the bigger picture, the war
between Islam and the West, I actually believe that the ultimate goal
is for both sides to continue the war as long as possible so that the
world is fed up with it and are more willing to accept a savior.
That's the idea behind what
Albert
Pike wrote in 1871. The ultimate goal of that
plan? "...Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged
to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries,
will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude,
disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that
moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but
without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the
true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of
Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This
manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which
will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both
conquered and exterminated at the same time." Just a bunch of
conspiracy mumbo-jumbo? We're dealing with an angel of light, existent
for millennia, working for the destruction of the human race while
influencing people through pride and selfishness to bring the world
under his dominion. He is the master conspirator and he's way smarter
than any of us. Keep watching!
Constitutional fudge Guardian
Unlimited (June 19, 2007)
- So far, Britain's stance on the German attempt to revise the EU
treaties has been - from a British perspective - broadly reasonable.
The common position of 10 Downing St, the Foreign Office and the
Treasury is that the new treaty must not transfer powers from
member-states to the EU. So at the EU summit in Berlin this week,
Britain will ask for the right to opt out of sensitive areas where
national vetoes are likely to be scrapped, such as justice and home
affairs, and social security. And a way will be found to ensure that
the Charter of Fundamental Rights does not apply to Britain. But on
one particular subject, the new provisions for foreign policy, British
policy is shifting, and in ways that could harm both Britain and the
EU. The most significant parts of the EU's constitutional treaty that
are likely to be carried over to the new amending treaty concern
foreign policy. The EU's current arrangements for representing its
viewpoint to the rest of the world - when it has a single viewpoint -
are dysfunctional. The rotating presidency shifts from one
member-state to another every six months, at the cost of continuity
and credibility with rest of the world. And the diplomatic side of
foreign policy, under the High Representative (now Javier Solana) in
the Council of Ministers, is separated from the economic side, under
the commissioner for external relations (now Benita Ferrero-Waldner).
Solana and Ferrero-Waldner run two bureaucracies that work on the same
problems (such as the Middle East, the Balkans, Russia and energy) but
do so separately, leading to different priorities and, too often,
mixed messages to the outside world. Because the huge spending
programmes of the Commission are seldom well-aligned with the EU's
political objectives, as set by the Council, Europe's influence in the
world is less than it could and should be. During the negotiation of
the constitutional treaty, the British and their allies sought to fix
these problems by creating a new "foreign minister", based on the jobs
now held by Solana and Ferrero-Waldner. This person would chair
meetings of the foreign ministers, replacing the rotating presidency.
He or she would also speak for the EU externally, instead of the
current "troika" of the foreign minister of the presidency, the High
Representative and the external relations commissioner. The foreign
minister would be supported by an "external action service",
consisting of the relevant officials from the Council of Ministers and
the Commission, and supplemented by others from the member-states. The
job of this service would be to provide advice, analysis and expertise
to the foreign minister. However, at a dinner of EU foreign ministers
in Brussels this week, Margaret Beckett, the foreign secretary,
unveiled a new British policy. The first point she made was expected,
and not unreasonable: the title of "foreign minister" should be
changed, since it could imply that the incumbent had authority over
national foreign ministers. But she then said that this person should
not chair the meetings of foreign ministers. She would restore this
function, which includes the ability to set the agenda and sum up at
the end, to the rotating presidency. This is bizarre: Britain has
pioneered efforts to reduce the role of the rotating presidency -
often in the face of tough opposition from smaller countries, which
remain attached to the institution. I have even heard William Hague,
never a great EU-enthusiast, say that the rotating presidency was a
system that needed reform. The NATO secretary-general chairs meetings
of NATO foreign and defence ministers, but does not have any power
over them. NATO would be much less effective if the secretary-general
was replaced by a rotating presidency. Beckett then went further,
saying that the British could not accept the external action service.
Apparently the creation of such a service could be portrayed as
"state-building" - despite the fact that a merger of the departments
working for Solana and Ferrero-Waldner would not give the EU new
powers vis-à-vis the member-states. It does not make sense for Britain
to support the foreign minister (or whatever that person is called)
but not an external action service. It would be like having a
conductor without an orchestra - or rather, a conductor trying to
conduct two separate orchestras at the same time. Most of the smaller
member-states initially opposed the plan for an external action
service, because they understand that bigger countries tend to
dominate EU foreign policy machinery. They have seen that happen
within the small staff that works for Solana (where the three key
officials are Pierre de Boissieu, the Frenchman who runs the Council
of Ministers secretariat; Robert Cooper, the British head of the
directorate for external relations; and Helga Schmid, the German head
of the policy unit). Britain, alongside the other large member-states,
would be well-placed to influence the external action service. This is
because Britain has a lot of highly skilled diplomats who would be
well-qualified to take the top jobs. more... |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | Solana
| I wonder
how this will be resolved? It's recognized that consolidation is
necessary, I wonder if some kind of security issue will make people
drop the concern for national sovereignty in the face of terrorism?
Peace and safety...
Turkey: Ruling Islamic-Rooted Party Will Win Elections, Survey Shows ADN
Kronos International (June 18, 2007)
- Turkish prime minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan's Justice and
Development Party (AKP) will score a clear victory in elections
scheduled for 22 July, results of a poll published Monday suggest.
However the survey conducted by the KONDA research agency for Raymond
James Brokerage, also indicated the AKP total number of seats in
parliament would fall to 307 from 352, still handing it a strong
majority to form a government in the 550 seat house. The poll also
indicated that the centre-left Republican People's Party (CHP) and the
ultra nationalist Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) will win enough
votes to to pass the 10 percent national treshold required to enter
parliament. It also showed that some 40 candidates running as
independents - and thus exempt from the 10 percent national threshold
rule - stand a good chance of being elected. Many of these are ethnic
Kurdish candidates, including several former members of the Democratic
Soiceity Party (DTP) which has been banned by authorities who accused
it of ties with Kurdish separatists. In a separate poll conducted by
the Turkish magazine Ekonomist magazine amongst 375 top members of the
business world, the AKP scored a preference of 32,6 percent, which
again if translated in amount of votes in the election, would allow
Erdogan's party to form a government alone. Among those polled by
Ekonomist, around one quarter (25,4) percent wanted to see an all-AKP
government, which they favoured for its perceived market friendly
policies. Only 11.3 percent wanted to see a government led by the
centre-left CHP, which has an anti-privatisation stance and is
sceptical of the benefits the country may reap from joining the
European Union. |
Gog/Magog |
Islam |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
Religious Education by Parents is "Child Abuse": Center for Inquiry
Proposal LifeSite
(June 18, 2007) - Religious
education is a form of child abuse and violates the rights of
children, contends a thesis to be considered by secular humanists at
the Center for Inquiry's congress in Beijing this October. The Center
for Inquiry, an organisation recently awarded special consultative
status as an NGO at the United Nations (UN) will consider the
proposals of Innaiah Narisetti, the chairman of the Center for
Inquiry's India chapter, that portend the next stage in the assault on
the rights of parents to educate their children. Nasiretti called the
influence of religion a "severe shortcoming in the global campaign to
protect children" and a contributor to child abuse saying, "In one
form or another, all religions violate the rights of children." "Such
abuse begins with the involuntary involvement of children in religious
practices from the time they are born," says Narisetti. "All
religions, through ritual, preaching, and religious texts, seek to
bring children into day-to-day religious practice." "This gives holy
books and scriptures, as well as those who teach them, an early grip
on the developing minds of young people, leaving an indelible
impression on them," said Narisetti, calling Sunday schools, madrassas,
or Jewish or Hindu temples, centers of indoctrination for children.
Nasiretti's proposal would reject the long-recognized inherent rights
of parents to educate and provide for their children's religious
instruction in favor of regulating children's exposure to religious
influence by world governments abiding by the UN Convention on the
Rights of the Child. "The time has come to debate the participation of
children in religious institutions," continues Narisetti. "While some
might see it as a matter better left to parents, the negative
influence of religion and its subsequent contribution to child abuse
from religious beliefs and practices requires us to ask whether
organized religion is an institution that needs limits set on how
early it should have access to children." The UN forum proposed by
Narisetti would debate the "pros and cons" of religion on children and
determine whether religion contributes to global child abuse. "The UN
must then take a clear stand on the issue of the forced involvement of
children in religious practices; it must speak up for the rights of
children and not the automatic right of parents and societies to pass
on religious beliefs, and it must reexamine whether an organization
like the Vatican should belong to the UN," stated Narisetti. "Until
this happens, millions of children worldwide will continue to be
abused in the name of religion, and the efforts made by the UN will
continue to address the symptoms but not the disease." |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
bok from fulfilledProphecy wrote this, "Read
the
NEA's resolutions to indoctrinate your children with communism,
globalism and homosexuality at the youngest ages possible. Who is
doing the indoctrinating? Maybe these parents are doing the
INOCULATING." Ultimately, it's well known
that the education of children affects their future beliefs.
Opponents of E.U. Treaty Accused of Being 'Terrorists' Daily
Express (June
17, 2007) - Eurosceptics have been branded "terrorists"
just days before Tony Blair prepares to fly to Brussels to smuggle in
the new EU constitution by the back door. Critics of the EU’s secret
plans to bring back the failed European constitution by stealth at
this week’s summit were blasted by the Italian President, Giorgio
Napolitano. The Italian head of state told a news conference in
Siena last week that "those who are anti EU are terrorists". And
he attacked eurosceptics who warn that the promised new EU treaty will
go too far in eroding the powers of member states, saying: "It
is psychological terrorism to suggest the spectre of a European
superstate." His comments emerged as EU foreign ministers
gather in Luxembourg today to negotiate the new treaty to replace the
failed EU constitution, ahead of a summit of EU leaders in Brussels on
Thursday. Ahead of what will be his last major political event before
he hands over to Gordon Brown, Mr Blair has been forced to deny
widespread claims that he will seek to sign up to a new treaty which
will revive the key planks of the constitution, which was doomed after
it was rejected by French and Dutch voters in referendums in 2005.
Downing Street
issued a list of Britain’s "red line" issues where Mr Blair will
refuse to hand over powers to Brussels, such as the veto on criminal
justice and labour law and Britain’s seat on the UN security council,
but refused to offer British voters a referendum on the treaty. But
critics say Mr Blair is, like most other EU leaders, determined to
bring the failed EU constitution in by the back door by simply
renaming the document as an "amending treaty" and slimming down its
original 500 pages. Campaigners for national referendums on the
proposed treaty were left outraged when President Napolitano spoke out
last Monday alongside the German President, Horst Kohler, who nodded
in agreement at his comments. |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
Hmm... Need I add anything to this?
Curious
Triangle: Maurice Strong, Paul Martin & Javier Solana NewsWithViews (June
17, 2007) - In March of 1995, there was a near shooting
war at high sea between Spain and Canada. Javier Solana was close to
beginning his 6 month dual coinciding presidency terms as president of
both the 10 nation Western European Union, a military federation and
the EU itself. He had BIG plans that would definitely need Morocco's
cooperation. Solana's larger agenda included the Barcelona Process. It
would be opened by a "Barcelona Conference" scheduled to take place in
Barcelona, Spain on November 27, 1995. It was to be a federation of 27
Mediterranean basin nations. He wanted it to: (1) Battle religious
fundamentalism, worldwide; (2) Mutually advantageous trading terms
over the area's resources leading to a Mediterranean Free Trade Zone
by 2010; (3) Get the USA out of the Mediterranean and/or greatly
reduce its presence there. Morocco was to pose a little problem and
Solana was working to solve it. Historically there has been little or
no love lost between Spain and Morocco. Solana could not put the
Barcelona Process together and sell it to the Arab population
countries without Moroccan support or at least lack of opposition.
Morocco demanded concessions. Solana who enjoyed extraordinary powers
for a mere cabinet official in Spain (he being the official spokesman
for the country for many years) negotiated and gave Morocco what they
sought. What they sought was (1) the ability to sell their produce in
Europe. Although the concession deeply impacted the produce growing
economy of the European Mediterranean and southern Atlantic countries
of France, Greece, Portugal and Spain, this was granted. Next, Morocco
demanded that Spanish fishermen stop fishing off her coastline. This
was granted and the Spanish fishermen were ordered home. It was March
of 1995. Six hundred unemployed Spanish fishing trawlers with their
owners and crews were sitting angrily unemployed in the Spanish
harbors. It was suggested to them that they could and should "go fish
Canada." They went to Canada's Newfoundland waters and fished the cod,
halibut, and turbot fishing stocks nearly to extinction. Canadian
correspondents tell me the stocks have never fully recovered. Canada,
of course, was not happy about this. I was told by former American
ambassador to Canada, former Michigan governor James Blanchard, that
the United States at that time assisted Canada in detecting that the
Spaniards were fishing using illegal methods. Blanchard confided in me
that electronic devices had been employed in making this
determination. Nothing much was done, however, until a Spanish
trawler, the Estai, crossed the boundary from international waters
into Canadian waters. When this occurred, Canadian authorities boarded
the ship and took both ship and crew into custody. At this point,
Javier Solana leaped into action. He promptly
dispatched three Spanish warships against Canada. Various scholars
have worked in an intellectual vein to
understand the event in terms of international law. Solana was
most
vocal about his differences with Canada, threatening the breaking
of all diplomatic relations with her.[1]
A political analysis would be much more relevant, but few have
analyzed Dr. Solana and his broader motives. more...
|
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | Solana
|
DEBKAfile
Exclusive: Hamas – and its Syrian and Iranian sponsors - capture
priceless Palestinian Authority intelligence archives in Gaza putsch DEBKAfile (June
17, 2007) - The Fatah-led general intelligence and security
services caved in too fast to shred, wipe or burn documents, computer
disks and archives. The entire collection fell into Hamas' hands when
they seized Palestinian Preventive Intelligence HQ at Tel Awa
(henceforth Tel al-Islam) and the Palestinian General Intelligence
center near Gaza port. DEBKAfile's intelligence sources say: Never
before has a bonanza of Western intelligence secrets on this scale
ever reached an implacably hostile Islamist terrorist gang. The US,
British and Israeli intelligence services may have suffered their
greatest debacle in the war on Islamist terror. It will take them many
years to recover. Hamas has taken possession of hundreds of
thousands of documents cataloguing the clandestine operations of
Western intelligence services in the Middle East, including Saudi
Arabia and the oil emirates. It is now the owner of complete archives of Palestinian undercover links with foreign intelligence
services going back decades, with names of spies, political
collaborators and double agents. The documentation covers the
secret ties Palestinian intelligence maintained from the 1970s, when
Yasser Arafat was based in Lebanon, with the Americans, the British,
the French, the Israelis and many others. Most intelligence experts
say Israel should have bombed the two buildings and destroyed their
contents rather than letting them fall into the hands of an
organization and country dedicated to its eclipse. For Hamas, this
booty is priceless – and not only as the repository of bombs for
planting under Mahmoud Abbas and his cohorts. The Palestinian group's
Syrian and Iranian sponsors will pay a king's ransom for this unique
collection of explosive secrets hidden by many a Western intelligence
agency and government. Damascus and Tehran will be hugely
empowered with the means to stay a jump ahead of American moves in the
region and tools to sabotage US policies at any time. They
will have a store of national secrets and compromising information to
hold over the heads of Western leaders and officials, lists of
undercover agents, and records of covert operations carried out by the
Israeli Mossad, Shin Bet and Military Intelligence, CIA, British MI6
and other Western agencies. Iran, Syria and Hamas will know the names
of politicians, including Israelis, who worked secretly with
Palestinians and their shady deals. One intelligence expert said that
the Gaza hoard left in enemy hands by Abbas and Mohammed Dahlan are
the crown jewels compared with the Saddam Hussein's intelligence
archives. In the Palestinian security service building, Hamas found
computer hard disks covering years of undercover activity and a
complete set of sophisticated wiretapping and surveillance equipment
and sensors which the CIA and MI6 gave Mahmoud Abbas and his forces.
It was all in perfect condition ready to switch on. After the Nazi
regime was defeated at the end of World War II and Eastern Germany
fell in the 1990s, there were officials willing to make a desperate
effort to destroy or hide their intelligence treasure. Palestinian
intelligence officers did not burn a single page.
|
Iran
|
Israel
|
Islam
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
America
|
Solana defends EU military planning hub EU
Observer (June 14, 2007)
- As the new EU military operations centre conducts its first
exercise with a virtual deployment of 2,000 European soldiers,
the bloc's foreign policy chief Javier Solana played down
criticism that the new body duplicates the role of NATO's
headquarters. "It's a question of a good and serious division of
labour, which is necessary with the number of crises we are
trying to handle," Mr Solana told journalists on Wednesday (14
June), AP reported. He rejected the suggestion that
the centre - set up earlier this year
in Brussels to enable the bloc to plan and run an autonomous
operation at the military strategic level - could be
seen as competition undermining links with the North Atlantic
pact. Such criticism has been recently voiced by UK conservative
MEP Geoffrey Van Orden MEP, who argued that the military
operations centre is a revival of the idea of a separate EU
operational planning staff proposed by four states (France,
Belgium, Germany and Luxembourg) in 2003 and rejected by the UK.
"The reasons to oppose such a move [in 2003] were clear - the EU
would be duplicating vital functions at the very heart of NATO,
would weaken enthusiasm for NATO-led operations, and ultimately
would displace the role of NATO's military planners," Mr van
Orden said. The British deputy added that originally a small EU
operational staff based at NATO has now turned into "the full
works" in the form of the new body, with "the fig leaf that the
EU is merely helping NATO and has only limited defence
ambitions" increasingly exposed. But the argument has been
rejected by the NATO chief himself, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer. At
the security and defence agenda conference in Brussels last
week, he said he thought the EU's operations centre was a good
idea and had nothing against it, AP writes. The virtual training
exercise taking place between 7 and 15 June is the EU's second
military exercise within the framework of its security and
defence policy but for the first time, its operational centre -
consisting of military and civilian officials - has been
activated. It is based on a scenario in a fictitious country (Alisia),
where a clash between a government and a rebel group hampers the
distribution of humanitarian aid to camps of internally
displaced persons, with a UN mission cut off from people in
need. The EU is asked to run an operation bridging the time
needed for the UN to reorganise its personnel which requires the
deployment of a force up to 2,000 people, including military
staff. The exercise is being conducted by the EU's military
operations centre in Brussels and in another EU building in
Enkoping, Sweden.
|
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | Solana
|
1st Seal |
EU Constitution 'Can Be Simple' BBC
News (June 14, 2007) - An
EU summit next week may agree to re-name the European constitution and
re-package it as a simple treaty, a report by German officials
suggests. But the report, seen by the BBC, says this "major
concession" will only be made if the "substance" of the original deal
is preserved. Germany will be chairing the summit in Brussels, which
may agree the outline of a treaty replacing the constitution. BBC
Europe editor Mark Mardell says the report poses some problems for the
UK. He says several areas would be difficult for British leaders to
sell to the British public without a referendum. The constitution was
signed by EU member states in 2004, but was rejected by French and
Dutch voters in referendums in 2005. British, French and Dutch
politicians have argued that the treaty must be simplified to prevent
the need for further referendums. It has not been general practice, in
most member states, to put routine amendments of EU treaties to a
public vote. The German proposals are also likely to be unwelcome in
Poland, because they say nothing about changing the voting system at
meetings of the 27 governments. Poland has threatened to block the new
constitution, unless its demands are met, but is coming under intense
pressure to drop its objections. French President Nicolas Sarkozy held
talks with his Polish counterpart, Lech Kaczynski, on Thursday, and Mr
Kaczynski is due to travel to Germany for a meeting with Chancellor
Angela Merkel on Saturday. "We think that during these days of extreme
importance, June 21 and 22, that we will reach a compromise and all
member states will come away from the summit fairly satisfied," Polish
President Lech Kaczynski told a news conference after his meeting with
Mr Sarkozy. more... |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
Secret New Plan For EU Super-State
Daily Express
(June 15, 2007) - Tony Blair
wants to hand the European Union radical new powers in his last act as
Prime Minister, it emerged today. The Prime Minister has welcomed
controversial plans to bring back the troubled EU constitution by the
back door - totally bypassing the need for public referendums on
sweeping new powers for Brussels. German chancellor Angela Merkel has
suggested ditching the name "constitution" from the title and instead
calling it an "amending treaty" - to avoid having to seek the approval
of voters. French and Dutch voters rejected the original plan - which
would hand Brussels the power to represent individual countries at the
UN and change national laws - two years ago. Britain's voting rights
would be reduced by a third under the scheme and our hard-won veto on
European directives would be torn up. Britain could also lose the
right to impose quotas on immigration. Shadow Foreign Secretary
William Hague said: "If Tony Blair thinks he can hoodwink the British
people by smuggling in the rejected EU constitution under another
name, he had better think again. "He underestimates the British
people. They will see right through any shabby stitch-up. "If the
Labour Government sign up to a new treaty that takes powers from
Britain and hands them over to the EU, the British people must have
the final say in a referendum." The Germans believe "as much of the
substance of the constitution as possible" should be kept, renamed and
put into law. more... |
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
The Little Horn
|
The Secret Nazis Covet the Temple Mount Ezine
@rticles - "Even before the end of this war, I revealed
to you the plans for a NAZI UNDERGROUND MOVEMENT, to go
underground as a SECRET organization the very moment they lost
the war - to lay low...then come forth when least expected,
RESTORE GERMANY TO POWER, and go on to finally accomplish their
aims in a WORLD WAR III" - The Plain Truth, Sept. 1948.
The Philadelphia Trumpet
magazine (Feb. 2000) reminded its international audience that
Herbert W. Armstrong wrote those prophetic words long before
they were confirmed by Reuters Arthur Spiegelman, who wrote on
May 10, 1996: "Realizing they were losing the war in 1944, Nazi
leaders met top German industrialists to plan a secret post-war
international network to restore them to power, according to a
newly declassified U.S. intelligence document. The
document...says an SS general and a representative of the German
armaments ministry told such companies as Krupp and Rohling that
they must be prepared to finance the Nazi Party...when it went
underground." Ella Steinberg, executive director of the World
Jewish Congress stated: "Now that the Nazi secret plan has been
confirmed, the central question is whether it has been carried
out." Need we wonder? Considering German hegemony throughout
Europe is practically a done deal (with the Vatican's blessing),
aren't Herbert W. Armstrong's warnings about the final revival
of the
"Holy Roman Empire"
being fulfilled before our very eyes? Only the deaf, dumb and
blind could deny that the Germans have thoroughly carried out
their plans! But what is the German-Catholic kingdom without the
crown of Jerusalem? "Woe to Ariel, Ariel, the city where David
dwelt!" (Isaiah 29:1). The Vatican covets
Mount Zion and
the Temple Mount and Europe won't quit until it occupies the
eternal capital of Israel! Both the Arabs and the Jews had
better beware any European moves into the Middle East. David
Ben-Ariel, a Christian-Zionist writer and author of
Beyond Babylon: Europe's Rise and Fall,
shares a special focus on the Middle East, reflected in
hard-hitting articles that help others improve their
understanding of that troubled region. Check out the
Beyond Babylon blog.
|
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
Temple Mount |
RCC | NewWorldOrder |
Woe to Ariel! (Jerusalem to suffer EU occupation) Ezine
@rticles - Isaiah 29:1 Woe to Ariel, to Ariel,
the city where David dwelt! Carl Sandburg, an American
writer warned: "If America forgets where she came from...if she
listens to the deniers and mockers, then will begin the rot and
dissolution." The same principle applies to our Jewish brethren
in Israel. The most merciful God of Jacob-Israel resurrected the
nation of Israel from the graveyard of history and offered us a
new opportunity to fulfill our unique calling to become a model
nation, a kingdom of priests, a light to all nations, based upon
the Law and the Prophets. Yet secular Jews, Hellenist Jews,
UNJews, have divorced themselves from the Bible and have sought
to make Israel just like all the other nations. And the
corrupt Chief Rabbinate and blind religious leaders have
woefully neglected (and forfeited by default) Judaism's most
holy site: the Temple Mount. Despite the faithlessness of many
of Israel's leaders, the Great God of the Universe liberated
areas of Judea and Samaria and restored Judaism's holiest site
(supposedly) - the Temple Mount - into Jewish hands. Did Israel
immediately invite the God of history to return with our exiles
(now making aliyah) by building the Third Temple? Did
they honor the God of our fathers by creating an Embassy for the
Eternal upon the Temple Mount? No! Instead Israelis
despised their most sacred inheritance, the crown jewel of
Jerusalem, and permitted militant Muslims to continue their
abominable occupation. The foreign foxes terrorize faithful Jews
and Christian Zionists who attempt to worship upon the Temple
Mount and illegally refuse to let them pray or read the Bible.
Israel has failed to uphold religious rights for non-Muslims
(that are trampled daily) and has failed to guarantee "freedom
of access." The biblical solution is to build the "House of
Prayer for All Peoples" spoken of by the Prophets. Queen
Victoria said: "I think it very unwise to give up what we hold,"
referring to territories of the British-Israelite empire. Judah
has been "very unwise" to surrender holy land to the enemies of
God and Israel in the name of a lying peace. The accursed and
treacherous Oslo accords, like a murderous cancer, continue to
eat away at the very foundations of the Jewish state and the
Jews have only themselves to blame. Does someone have to be a
prophet to recognize prophetic trends and to be grieved about
them? Or to perceive that divine judgment is surely coming upon
our beloved nations? Can't we just be like righteous King Josiah
who HEARD AND BELIEVED the inspired words of the PROPHETS? (2
Chron. 34:15-33). He took God's "ancient" warning seriously and
then did everything he could to avert national disaster! God
respected him for it. Yet the American, British and Jewish
peoples today despise those who dare come forth, teaching and
preaching the Word of God, encouraging repentance to spare our
people from the unprecedented "Time of Jacob's Trouble," "the
Great Tribulation" (Jer. 30:7, Matt. 24:21). At least, when
they're temporarily crushed under the heels of a German-led
Europe, when the Jewish Quarter is made Judenrein and
the
Temple Mount seized and occupied
by
Vatican forces that are intent
on ripping the heart out of Israel for their pagan purposes
(Dan. 11:45, Zech. 14:2), they will remember that they had
been warned by a loving God, and hopefully will then have a
change of heart and attitude that will hasten the process of
redemption and welcome home the Messiah whom Two Witnesses will
announce to the
cities of Judah and proclaim to
the world (Zech. 12:10). |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
Temple Mount |
RCC | NewWorldOrder |
Solana Says EU Would Consider Military Role In Gaza Haaretz (June
13, 2007) - The European Union would
consider participating in an international force in Gaza if asked by
the major players in the region, the EU's foreign policy chief Javier
Solana said Wednesday. "If we are asked, of course, we will consider
the possibility," Solana told reporters. He spoke in response to a
suggestion by Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert that international
forces could be stationed along the Gaza Strip's volatile border with
Egypt to prevent arms from reaching Palestinian militants. The EU,
which has police officers already helping to monitor the Gaza-Egypt
border, has long said it would examine a possible peacekeeping role in
the region if there is an agreement between Israel and the
Palestinians. Solana stressed that as yet there had been no decision
among players in the region to seek EU help. "We are far from a
decision," he said. "We'll see how things go, and what is the decision
to be taken by the important players, that have to take a decision,
which are ... the Israelis, the Palestinians and the Egyptians."
Solana said he'd been in touch overnight with Palestinian Authority
Chairman Mahmoud Abbas and other Palestinian leaders in an effort to
calm the situation in the Gaza Strip between Abbas' Fatah forces and
the rival Hamas faction. On Tuesday, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said
he supports the deployment of a multinational force along the
Philadelphi Route in Rafah on the Gaza-Egypt border.
more... |
Islam |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | Solana
|
1st Seal |
Daniel 8:25,
"And through his policy also he shall cause
craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his
heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up
against the Prince of princes; but he shall be broken without hand."
As I've said before, this is speaking of Antiochus IV, who performed
an abomination of desolation (setting up an idol in the Holy of
Holies) several hundred years before Christ. However, the same spirit
of antichrist that motivated him, will be with the final man who will
declare himself god in the future. Currently, the Western European
Union fits the 10 toes/10 horns prophecy the best and there is one man
who is at the head of the WEU among other powerful positions. The deep
desire for peace by the world in the face of radical Islam fits, I
think, with the idea of conquering by peace. He conquers those causing
the trouble by force and conquers the rest of the world (the West) by
offering them the solution to the chaos they want. Since Lucifer is
behind both, he can play off each other to wear down the world to the
point of exhaustion and they will accept any messiah who can solve
their worldly problems. Are we in this time? I believe we are and
HIStory, Our Future seems to provide the Biblical details
while looking at history to strengthen faith in what the Bible says
about the future. I believe that time is now.
Italy's Prodi says EU close to deal on treaty Tehran
Times (June 13, 2007)
- Italian Prime Minister Romano Prodi said the member states of the
European Union were close to agreeing on a treaty to replace their
rejected draft constitution. "We are close to the goal of finding a
common synthesis to the next European framework. The way has been
well-paved," he said ahead of talks with his German and Hungarian
counterparts and Lithuanian President Valdas Adamkus in Berlin. "We
are prepared for giving a clear mandate to the upcoming
intergovernmental conference," Prodi added. Germany, which holds the
EU's rotating presidency, wants to unveil a plan on the outline of a
new treaty and how to ratify it before European Parliament elections
in 2009 at the bloc's summit in Brussels on June 21-22. Problem areas
with regard to the content of the treaty would then be ironed out at
an intergovernmental conference, possibly starting in July. German
Chancellor Angela Merkel's government has signaled that it is
confident of clinching a deal in Brussels despite veto threats from
Poland's conservative leaders. Merkel told reporters Monday: "We will
do everything possible to ensure that we take a big step forward at
this summit." "The starting positions are very different and
everybody's ability to compromise will be tested," she conceded. With
pre-summit negotiations in their final stage, Britain, the Czech
Republic, the Netherlands and Poland are shaping up as the most
difficult countries to convince of reforms written into a new treaty.
more... |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
Mideast 'may see full-scale war' The
Press Association (June
12, 2007) - UN envoy Terje Roed-Larsen has warned that the
Middle East could see full-scale war. He said a fresh effort was
needed to contain the current violence, or energetic diplomacy to try
to bring peace. "The picture which emerges is very dark, and
apparently getting darker," he said. "So there are reasons for real
concerns in the international community." Roed-Larsen, the current UN
envoy for Lebanon-Syria issues who for many years was the top UN
Mideast envoy, said "the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East has
changed fundamentally over a few years". "A few years ago, as it had
been over many, many decades, the centre of gravity for all the
conflicts were the Israeli-Arab conflicts," he said. "Now, there seems
to be four epicentres of conflict in the region with their own
dynamics, the Iraqi issues, the Iranian issues, the Syrian-Lebanese
issues, and of course the heart of hearts, the traditional conflict,
the Palestinian-Israeli issue." |
Israel |
Islam |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | 1st
Seal |
It is clear that Jerusalem is a burdensome stone for all people.
Zechariah 12:1-3, "The
burden of the word of the LORD for Israel, saith the LORD, which
stretcheth forth the heavens, and layeth the foundation of the earth,
and formeth the spirit of man within him. Behold, I will make
Jerusalem a cup of trembling unto all the people round about, when
they shall be in the siege both against Judah and against
Jerusalem. And in that day will I make Jerusalem a burdensome
stone for all people: all that burden themselves with it shall be cut
in pieces, though all the people of the earth be gathered
together against it." It's recognized as the center of the
conflict brought about by radical Islam because it centers on that
age-old conflict between Isaac and Ishmael. The conflict centers on
the ownership of the land. The "Palestinian" claim is built on lies
and deception repeated over and over like a mantra so those who don't
have the desire to search out the truth are pulled into accepting the
lie. They don't understand
Islam very well, in my opinion. They are told its ok to lie to
non-Muslims, or kuffah.
Sarkozy says he and Blair agree on reforming the EU
Scotsman (June
7, 2007) - President Nicolas Sarkozy of France said Thursday that he and
Prime Minister Tony Blair of Britain had struck a deal on reforming the EU's
institutions while Germany reported progress toward a treaty. Sarkozy has been
pushing for a "simplified treaty" that countries could ratify without consulting
voters. That would streamline decision-making in the European Union after French
and Dutch voters rejected a European constitution in referendums in 2005. "Tony
Blair and I have just agreed on what might be the framework for a simplified
treaty. That is quite something," Sarkozy said after meeting Blair on the
sidelines of the Group of 8 meeting here. "We agreed that it should be a new
treaty and not a small constitution." In Brussels, Foreign Minister Frank-Walter
Steinmeier of Germany told the European Parliament that EU member states had
narrowed their differences over a new treaty, raising hopes that a deal would be
reached at an EU summit meeting on June 21 and 22. "The number of open questions
has been substantially reduced," Steinmeier said. Germany, which holds the EU's
six-month rotating presidency, hopes to clinch a preliminary deal at that
meeting. The EU's 27 members committed themselves in March to trying to secure a
final agreement on the treaty by the end of this year. The aim is to overhaul the union's institutions and make the bloc more efficient
following its rapid enlargement. Sarkozy advocated adopting a "mini-treaty" last
year, before he was elected president, but has since replaced this term with
"simplified treaty" to placate the 18 EU states that have ratified the
constitution. Diplomats said that under the emerging accord, the EU would have
the long-term president and foreign minister envisaged under the constitution
but probably with different titles. Poland wants changes to the voting system
envisaged under the draft constitution and agreed to by other EU
members. Britain wants the constitution's charter of fundamental
rights excluded, but Germany and others want a clause giving it legal
force. Sarkozy said he had agreed with Blair on how to tackle the
fundamental rights issue but did not go into details.
|
EU
/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
Brussels Plenary 6-7 June: Constitution, Middle East, Visas European
Parliament (June
6, 2007) - Javier Solana briefed MEPs on his view of the situation
as it stands in the region amid renewed violence betwen Israel and the
Palestinians and in Lebanon. He told Members that "we've faced 40 years of
suffering from both sides...we can look back at the past and see what
mistakes we've made, or we can look at the future". Although painting a
stark picture of the situation he did express some optimism that the time
may be right for progress towards peace. Indeed he said that not since the
2000 Camp David talks has there been a better time for peace. He
stressed three reasons why he thought this the case.
- The first was that an Arab peace
was now in place. This refers to the Saudi Plan endorsed by the Arab
league this year that would see Israel return to its 1967 borders in
return for peace treaties and recognition from Arab states.
- The second factor Mr Solana
noted was the psychological importance of the 40th anniversary of the
six day war.
- Finally he said that for
the first time the EU was strongly represented at the negotiating
table.
José Salafranca for the Parliament's
largest political group the European People's Party and European
Democrats called for the Palestinian government to "commit itself to
democracy and the renunciation of violence". He went on to say that the
EU should present a united front and support the work of the Quartet.
What the region needs is an international buffer force to prevent
further violence in Gaza according to Pasqualina Napolitano of the PSE
group. She also called for the EU to support the Palestinian National
Unity Government openly. This theme of support for the
Palestinian authorities was picked up by Brian Crowley for the Union of
Europe for the Nations Group (UEN). He said the EU "had
sent the wrong signal" whan it cut money to the Palestinians following
the election of Hamas deputies. The Greens/EFA speaker backed this
point calling for financial aid to the Palestinians. He said that "
Israel had won the six-day war, but lost the 40-year peace". The leaders
of Parliament's respective delegations to the region also spoke. The
Chair of the delegation to Israel Jana Hybášková stressed "we face not
only 'Iraqisation' but also 'Iranization' in the Middle East. Extremist
groups are endangering citizens as well as the peace process," she
said. Kyriacos Triantaphyllides - chair of the delegation for relations
with the Palestinian Legislative Council - expressed his solidarity with
"our Palestinian colleagues imprisoned by Israel", referring to the fact
Israel has detained 45 members of the Palestinian Legislative Council in
the last year. The Commissioner for External Relations Benita
Ferrero-Waldner asked for the release of both Palestinian and Israeli
political prisoners, as well as BBC journalist Alan Johnston and for
funds to the Palestinian Authority to be released by Israel. The
vote on a resolution on the Middle East will take place during the next
plenary session in Strasbourg later this month. more...
|
Israel |
Islam |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | Solana
|
1st Seal |
Solana, EU Commissioner discuss Middle East Alarab
Online (June
6, 2007) - Javier Solana, European Union High Representative for
the Common Foreign and Security Policy, and EU External Relations
Commissioner Benita Ferrero-Waldner discussed the situation in the Middle
East with Members of the European Parliament on Wednesday during plenary
session in Brussels. Before they made their statements, Kyriacos
Triantaphyllides (GUE/NGL, Cyprus), Chairman of the European Parliament
delegation for relations with the Palestinian Legislative Council, read
out a statement on behalf of 45 MEPs expressing solidarity with 45
imprisoned Palestinian MPs. In response, European Parliament President
Hans-Gert Pöttering recalled that during his speech to the Knesset on 30
May he had called for the release of the MPs. Solana looked back at 40
years of Israeli occupation and settlements and suffering by Palestinian
and Israeli citizens on the 40th anniversary of the Six Day War. He said
there was a choice of looking back at the mistakes of the past or looking
ahead and working towards a solution to the conflict. He chose the
latter, a rapid settlement to make peace a reality, which would
require "will and determination." He reported on his recent visit
to the Middle East, describing “difficult moments” for the Palestinians,
renewed conflict, and ceasefires not maintained by either side. He called
for another ceasefire and for Israel to show moderation and release
Palestinian tax and customs revenues. Solana considered the latest
meeting of the Middle East Quartet "probably one of most important" so far.
He said the Quartet would go to the region for the first time next week
and meet with leaders there. He saw peace "on the horizon," supported
by UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, US Secretary of State Condoleezza
Rice and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. Brian Crowley, (UEN,
Ireland) said the focus should be on solving the Arab-Israeli conflict, on
which everything in the Middle East depends. Francis Wurtz, President
of the GUE/ NGL Group, believes "doing nothing makes us guilty too." Jana
Hybášková (EPP-ED, Czech Republic) warned of the danger of an "Iraqisation"
of the Gaza Strip and "Iranisation" of the Middle East, “a threat to us
all,” and called for Palestinian recognition of Israel after quoting
statements made to the contrary on Al Jazeera. more...
|
Israel |
Islam |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | Solana
|
1st Seal |
Solana: Gaza peace force possible Jerusalem
Post (June 6, 2007) -
It is possible that an international peacekeeping force would be stationed
in the Gaza Strip, even though it would probably be difficult for Egypt to
agree to its deployment, European Union Foreign Policy Chief Javier Solana
said on Wednesday. Solana told the European Parliament in Brussels that
"for the first time in many, many years, the idea of an international
force" was not out of the question. Solana said two groups in the Knesset
had said it may be the moment to call for such a force south of Rafah
Crossing. "We are working on that," he said. "The Israelis are also
considering that possibility, the Palestinians are considering that
possibility, the Egyptians are considering that possibility." Solana said
it would probably be difficult for Egypt as deployment of such a force
might give the impression it was not able to control that part of the
border. However, he added: "I think we can still get into discussions on
these issues and maybe eventually get a solution." The EU's External
Relations Commissioner Benita Ferrero-Waldner told the parliament an
international mechanism to provide direct aid to the Palestinians would be
extended for a further three months. She said humanitarian conditions
remained "dire" and urged EU members states to offer extra funds." |
Israel |
Islam |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | Solana
|
1st Seal |
I think we're going to see this idea of an international police force
become more prevalent. Ultimately there has to be a system in place for
the antichrist to exert his control through. I think that force will start
with his kingdom and through peace and security efforts, spread world-wide
rapidly. Because the U.S. is blind to the spiritual forces at work, the
nation will probably join right up with it.
Foreign Ministry Promoting Relations With the EU Israel
National News (June 5, 2007)
- A series of special events taking place this week is devoted to
enhancing Israel-EU relations. Some of the events are on the government
level, others involve the private sector. On Sunday, senior European and
Israeli officials met at a one-day forum addressing the future of
EU-Israel relations. The meeting, called at the initiative of Foreign
Minister Tzipi Livni, was arranged with the assistance and coordination of
the German head of the rotating EU presidency and EU External Relations
Commissioner Benita Ferrero-Waldner. The objective of the day-long
event was to examine possibilities of improving relations between Israel
and the European states in various fields. The forum will submit a written
report by the end of the year to the European and Israeli foreign
ministers, including recommendations and practical suggestions. The
Israeli delegates to the forum included many senior officials, among them
the Governor of the Bank of Israel, the Director General of the Ministry
of Infrastructures, the Assistant Attorney General, the Director General
of the Council for Higher Education, and officials from the Ministries of
Industry and Trade, Environmental Protection, Finance and Transportation,
as well as representatives from the National Security Council.The
following day, Monday, saw the annual meeting of senior officials
responsible for ongoing Israel-EU bilateral relations. The subjects on the
agenda included renewal of the mandate for European observers at the
Gaza-Egypt Rafiach crossing, and the Israeli demand that the EU continue
to refrain from transferring funds directly to the Palestinian Authority
government headed by Hamas. Other subjects raised at the meeting included
bilateral trade, cultural exchanges, mutual research and development
projects, and international legal issues. Also discussed was the new
Israeli-EU Chamber of Commerce, inaugurated on Tuesday. |
Israel |
Islam |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | 1st
Seal |
EU to conduct military exercise China
View (XINHUA) (June 5,
2007) - The
European Union (EU) will conduct
its second military exercise
from June 7-15, the EU Council
announced here on Monday. The
exercise, in the framework of
the European Security and
Defense Policy (ESDP), is a
Command Post Exercise (CPX) and
will focus on the key military
aspects of crisis
management. "No troops will be
deployed," said a press release
issued by the EU Council
Secretariat. During the conduct
of the exercise, the EU
Operations Center (EU Ops
Center), composed of military
and civilian elements, will be
activated for the first
time. This will be the second
time for the EU to stage a
military exercise. The first
military exercise ever staged by
the EU, however, was conducted
in November 2005. The exercise
will focus on the interaction
between the EU Ops Center in
Brussels and an EU Force
Headquarters (FHQ) in Enkoping
of Sweden, in the context of an
autonomous EU-led military
operation. According to the EU
Council, the exercise will be
based on a newly developed
scenario called ALISIA that is
being used for EU exercises
during the time frame from 2006
to 2010. The
scenario depicts a situation in
a fictitious country (Alisia),
where friction between the
Transitional Government of
Alisia and a rebel group
(National Freedom Movement)
leads to a situation in which
the deployment of humanitarian
aid to camps of internally
displaced persons in the
North-Western part of the
country is significantly
hampered. A UN mission already
on the ground does not have
sufficient capabilities to
address the situation. Under the
scenario, at the request of the
UN, the EU has decided to
conduct an operation bridging
the time needed for the UN to
reorganize its personnel. The
EU operation will include the
deployment of a force up to 2000
personnel including an
IntegratedPolice Unit,
temporarily placed under
military responsibility. The
EU Council said some 200
"players" and supporting
personnel are expected to take
part. The exercise is
carried out under the
operational authority of the
EU's security policy chief
Javier Solana.
Lieutenant-General David Leakey
is the official conducting the
exercise. |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | Solana
|
Read
Recommendation 666 by Herb L. Peters for a little history on this. He
was just diagnosed with colon cancer, please keep him and family in your
prayers.
Putin threatens to target Europe Globeandmail.com
(June 4,
2007) - He also
lashes out at NATO and insists
he's world's only true democrat.
In a threat not uttered since the
Cold War, Vladimir Putin said that
Russia intends to aim its missile
systems - potentially nuclear
weapons - at targets in Europe in
retaliation for the U.S. decision
to establish antimissile bases
there. During a lengthy dinner,
Russia's President defended his
semi-authoritarian style and
insisted he is the world's only
true democrat. In an interview
with The Globe and Mail and a
small circle of other journalists,
he stressed that his country is
not moving away from a market
economy, refused to consider
extraditing a former KGB agent
charged with poisoning a dissident
in London, and lashed out
repeatedly at the United States
and NATO for operating in
countries previously within
Russia's sphere of influence. Mr.
Putin's remarks, translated from
Russian, virtually guarantee much
of the G8 summit, due to begin in
northern Germany on Wednesday,
will be dominated by the growing
confrontation between the West and
Russia. Mr.
Putin repeatedly described U.S.
antimissile bases, which will be
built in the Czech Republic and
Poland, both former Warsaw Pact
countries, as "an element of the
nuclear potential of the United
States," and that the alleged
threat from Iranian missiles is a
myth. Washington says that the
bases are purely defensive and
designed to shoot down missiles
launched at the United States from
Iran or other rogue states. Asked
what he might do to retaliate, he
said he would return to the Cold
War practice of having Russian
ballistic missiles programmed to
strike targets in Europe - in this
case, he said, the Czech and
Polish antimissile sites as well
as new U.S. bases in Bulgaria and
Romania. "It is obvious that if
part of the strategic nuclear
potential of the United States is
located in Europe, and according
to our military experts will be
threatening us, we will have to
respond," he said. "What kind of
steps are we going to take in
response? Of course, we are going
to get new targets in Europe." He
suggested that this could include
powerful nuclear-capable weapons.
more...
|
Gog/Magog
|
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
Chief rabbis, EU president discuss
'interfaith UN' Jerusalem
Post (May 30,
2007) - European
Parliament President Hans-Gert
Pottering said Wednesday in a
meeting with Israel's chief rabbis
that he would support the
establishment of an "interfaith
United Nations"
that would bring together
religious leaders from all over
the world to promote peace. Chief
Ashkenazi Rabbi Yona Metzger first
proposed the idea at an interfaith
meeting several months ago. But
Metzger said that Wednesday's
meeting with Pottering marked the
first time a political figure had
shown interest in concrete steps
towards achieving that idea.
"After our meeting, the president
sent an envoy to discuss in more
detail the creation of an
international body made up of
religious leaders who could foster
peace," said Metzger. "I envision
the body being based in the holy
city of Jerusalem,
which is sacred to the three
monotheistic religious. But
disputes over its location should
not delay the establishment of the
interfaith UN," Metzger added. In
a press release, the Chief
Rabbinate said an interfaith UN
could help combat anti-Semitism.
Metzger said that the controversy
sparked by the Mughrabi bridge
excavations near the Temple Mount
was a perfect example of how
dialogue between religious leaders
assuaged religious extremist
rancor sparked by misinformation.
"After explaining in the
international media that
construction of the bridge did not
endanger Al-Aksa Mosque, people
calmed down," said Metzger.
more... |
Israel
|
EU
/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
Apostasy |
Solana, Zoellick and the World
Bank
News With Views:
Constance
Cumbey
(May 31, 2007) - Portfolio
now include Robert Zoellick and
the World Bank. Newswithviews
regular readers may remember my
February 21st article. In it, I
covered Javier Solana's
Valentine's Day speech (February
14, 2007) in New York City. He was
addressing the Arthur F. Burns
Foundation. He was introduced by
Robert F. Zoellick. Today
that same Robert F. Zoellick, “a
friend for many, many years” of
Javier Solana
[1] was
nominated by President George W.
Bush to be head of the World
Bank.[2]
Perhaps raising their own expected
opposition so that they may just
as rapidly unilaterally squelch
it, the Bookings Institution,
another confederate, together with
Zoellick for Javier Solana's
Global Governance initiative, most
disingenuously issued a statement
that foreign countries may be
unhappy at the nomination. I
suspect that at least “The Face
and Voice of Europe”[3]
in the form of Javier Solana is
not. I also suspect that the
Brookings Institution itself is
not unhappy! At the February 14th
New York City event, “dear Javier”
was introduced by German
Ambassador to the USA, Klaus
Scharioth as “The Face and Voice
of Europe.” Five weeks later,
Javier Solana would with the
assistance of New York University,
Stanford University and the
Brookings Institution all
apparently acting with the
blessings of the
United States State Department
would launch a new global security
initiative.
[4] Javier Solana has
evidently had a cozy relationship
with both Zoellick and the
Brookings Institution. On January
5th, while in the USA, his busy
itinerary included a meeting with
Brookings Institution
representatives.[5]
Gingerly, like testing the water,
“global constitutionalism” a/k/a
“global governance” is being
advanced. This is not entirely
unlike George H. W. Bush (Bush the
elder) mentioning the New World
Order and his intentions to
advance same in a speech he
auspiciously delivered on
September 11, 1991. Similar
speeches were given other times.[6]
That Robert Zoellick is part of
that scene is clear. In addition
to being a friend of Javier Solana
for many years, Robert Zoellick
has with equal vigor been a friend
and proponent of a “New
World Order,” more recently
and politely known as “global
governance.” As early as March,
1992, Robert Zoellick was speaking
of his World Economic Forum
inspired epiphanies of a New World
Order.[7]
They are calling all of this by
various names these days.
Condoleezza Rice calls it “Transformational
Diplomacy.” Fletcher Law
School Associate Professor Daniel
W. Drezner calls it “the New New
World Order.”[8]
It appears that although Javier
Solana may have his European
migraines as reluctance to
hand him everything appears among
the masses, he has offsetting
advantages of global elitist
support. |
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
Solana
| NewWorldOrder |
America
|
'Boycott call reminiscent of witch
hunt'
Ynet News
(May 31, 2007) - Responding
to UK lecturers' call to boycott
Israel, Bar Ilan professor says
Israel not apartheid state,
shouldn't be held to higher
standards than other countries,
including US and Britain. "The
British lecturers' union is trying
to de-legitimize Israel by
promoting radical prejudice," Dr
Jonathan Rynhold of Bar Ilan
University and member of the
international Advisory Board for
Academic Freedom said Wednesday
following a decision by Britain's
University and College Union (UCU)
to consider boycotting Israeli
academic institutions. According
to Rynhold, the decision was
reminiscent of "McCarthy's witch
hunt." The UCU has called on the
European Union to cut funding to
the Israeli academia until Israel
obeys UN Security Council
resolutions and withdraws from the
West Bank. This is the fourth time
since 2003 that British lecturer
groups are calling to boycott
Israeli universities. Rynhold
stated that the UCU's
"hypocritical" decision was the
result of pressure by the radical
Left, which believed Israel had no
right to exist. "This isn't
anti-Semitism, but it's prejudice,
according to which the
Palestinians and other nations
have the right for
self-determination, while the Jews
don't. "It's clear to everyone
that Israel is not one of the most
problematic countries in terms of
human rights violations, such as
China, Saudi Arabia and even the
United States and Britain, which
operate in Iraq and whose behavior
is much more problematic. And
still, it is Israel that is being
threatened with this boycott."
Rynhold warned of the dangerous
link between the academic world
and politics. "Only in very
extreme cases should academia and
politics be bound together, but
what goes on in Israel is far from
being an extreme case. There is no
apartheid here, as some try to
portray it. "In an apartheid state
there wouldn't be Arab parties or
an Arab judge. We have academic
freedom and minority rights, and
the Israeli academia encourages
peace and enables both sides to
get to know each other better."
|
Israel
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
UN Troops Traded Guns for Gold
With Militias, Says Report The Independent (May
24, 2007) - Scandal is
engulfing the United Nations once
again after allegations that
peacekeepers stationed in Congo
traded guns for gold with militia
groups that they were meant to be
disarming. Meanwhile, a trial got
under way in New York of a former
UN official accused of taking
bribes. The UN mission in the
Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)
said in a statement that an
investigation into the
guns-for-gold claims had begun and
was continuing, adding that it had
a "zero-tolerance policy for
misconduct and will remain
vigilant in preventing egregious
and unacceptable behaviour". At
the heart of the investigation are
allegations that, in 2005,
Pakistani soldiers sent by the UN
to restore peace in Ituri province
around the north-eastern mining
town of Mongbwalu began returning
guns to militia groups, receiving
gold in exchange. Witnesses
confirmed the existence of the
trade to the BBC. One Congolese
officer "repeatedly saw militia
who had been disarmed one day but
the next day would become rearmed
again. The information he could
obtain was always the same, that
it would be the Pakistani
battalion giving arms back to the
militia." Human Rights Watch said
it had its own information on the
case which it had passed to the
UN. "Pakistani officers were
involved in illegal smuggling of
between $2m-$5m in gold out of
Ituri. We have very solid
information on this," said Anneke
Van Woudenberg, a researcher with
the group. The Congo force of
almost 18,000 soldiers is the
largest UN deployment in the
world. It has been credited with
helping the country's transition
to a fragile democracy after a
vicious civil war from 1998 to
2003 that killed as many as four
million people and drew in forces
from several neighbouring
countries. The UN has been accused
of burying the initial findings of
the investigation to avoid
embarrassing Pakistan, the largest
peacekeeping troop contributor.
The UN's special representative in
the DRC, William Swing,
emphatically denied the
guns-for-gold claims. A
spokeswoman for the Foreign
Ministry in Islamabad, Tasnim
Aslam, said yesterday that it had
been informed by the UN
peacekeeping department, the DPKO,
on Tuesday of the media exposure
of the case. "The DPKO also
informed our mission that, at this
stage, these were mere
allegations, which have to be
looked into," she said. "On our
part, our relevant authorities
will look into the matter to
ascertain facts."
more...
|
Islam
|
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
'Peacemaker' Solana heads to
Mideast Jerusalem
Newswire (May 21, 2007)
- European Union foreign policy
czar Javier Solana arrived in the
Middle East Monday in his latest
bid to reduce tension between
Israel and the Palestinian Arabs
after a week of spiraling
violence. Eight Arabs were
reportedly killed Sunday evening
as Israel continued efforts to
stop the firing of Kassam rockets
from Gaza at civilians in southern
Israel. Dozens of missiles have
fallen on and around the Negev
town of Sderot in the past week,
injuring Israelis and damaging
buildings - including a school
classroom, kindergarten and petrol
station. Solana, whose "solution"
to the decades' old conflict sees
Israel surrendering more Jewish
lands to Arab control, plans to
visit Jerusalem, areas Israel has
given to the "Palestinians," Egypt
- which is also able to exert
pressure on Israel, and Lebanon.
According to a statement from his
office, Solana will let Israel
know that the EU backs the Arab
League's "peace" plan. He will
tell the Arabs in Samaria, Judea
and Gaza that it is important for
them to stop fighting among
themselves so that they can get a
"State of Palestine" as soon as
possible. And he will likely
convey to the Israeli government
Europe's displeasure at the IDF's
defensive actions against the
terrorists in the Gaza Strip.
|
Israel
|
Islam
|
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | Solana
|
1st Seal
|
Bush gets ready for Iraq U-turn by
Brown
(May
20, 2007) -
Gordon Brown is
prepared to risk the future of the
"special relationship" with the
United States by reversing Tony
Blair's support for the Iraq war,
President George W Bush has been
warned. He has been briefed by
White House officials to expect an
announcement on British troop
withdrawals from Mr Brown during
his first 100 days in power. It
would be designed to boost the new
prime minister's popularity in the
opinion polls. The President
recently discussed with a senior
White House adviser how to handle
the fallout from the expected loss
of Washington's main ally in Iraq,
The Sunday Telegraph has learned.
Details of the talks came as a
close ally of Mr Brown called for
a quicker withdrawal of British
troops. Nigel Griffiths, a former
minister, said: "We should get out
of Iraq as soon as is practicable.
We should consult the Iraqi
government - but they cannot have
a veto. This cannot be delayed."
Mr Griffiths, who resigned as
deputy leader of the Commons this
year over the decision to replace
the Trident nuclear weapons
system, spoke out as reports
suggested that Mr Brown would use
an early trip to Iraq to reassess
Britain's role and accelerate the
withdrawal. Revelation of the US
fears will reinforce expectations
in Westminster that Mr Brown will
make a decisive break with Mr
Blair's support for the war.
more...
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
America
|
Blair-faced Liars: Blair, Clinton and the New World Order European
Institute of Protestant Studies (May 18,
2000) - A very perceptive article by Steve
Pierce entitled "My peace I give you", published in the January, 1998,
edition of Workers of Iniquity, exposes the fact that it is
really the Roman Catholic Church that is behind the façade of Tony
Blair and New Labour. It could also be shown that the same is true of
Bill Clinton and his universal 'peace' missions. The already proven
sympathy of both men with the Romanist faith and system, as well as
their active dedication to promoting the policies of the Papacy
world-wide, is a reflection of the real men behind the masks. On page
8 Pierce writes:
"Until he attended
the 1993 meeting [of European Heads of State] in Athens, Tony Blair
was merely the Shadow Home Secretary. Following this meeting,
however, he was carefully groomed and 'raised up' to fulfil the
requirements of the 'coming New Order' which he briefly mentioned in
a political speech on March 18, 1997, though few noticed or
understood the implications of what he said. Since then he has been
carefully steered and has regularly received much guidance and
counselling from Bill Clinton, who not only accompanied him to the
Amsterdam Summit, but afterwards instructed our Parliament, though
the voters who put Blair into office were not allowed to know what
was discussed; and what is an American President doing instructing
our Parliament in the first place? If it was something beneficial or
acceptable to the United Kingdom's populace we would have been told,
so obviously whatever was discussed was either alarming or
unacceptable. […] It looks like we are going to find out the hard
way."
What is this 'New
Order' being promoted behind the pressed suits and contrived body
language of Blair and the hypocritical moralising of the
arch-immoralist Clinton? What Tony Blair is really doing, says Pierce,
is ushering in the [resurrection of the] 'Holy' Roman Empire. This is
entirely consistent with our analysis that the real aim of the
European Union is a United Roman Catholic States of Europe, which was
the ideal pursued by Pius XII through his Concordat with Adolf Hitler.
In a remarkable speech given in French in 1975, Pope Paul VI said that
it was "the [Roman] Catholic faith that made Europe" and added: "No
other human force in Europe can render the service that is confided to
us, promoters of the faith, to awaken the Christian soul of Europe,
where its unity is rooted." [Reported in The Reformer,
January/February, 1976. Note that it is a "human" force, not one of
God.] It is the Papacy that is behind the drive for European unity.
The English philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679) once remarked: "The
Papacy is no other than the ghost of the deceased Roman Empire,
sitting crowned upon the grave thereof." [Leviathan, Part 4,
Chapter 47 (1651).] The Microsoft Encarta Encyclopaedia 99
article on the Roman Empire states:
"It was the [Roman
Catholic] Church, more than anything, that was the real heir of the
Empire, and which was able to provide a measure of continuity after
the collapse of temporal power and civil administration. The Papacy
continued to be based in Rome and to exert enormous authority over
most of Europe, keeping alive not only many of the ideas of the
Roman world but also a sense of a wider community which looked to
the ancient city for support and leadership."
The dream of
re-establishing that Empire has never been abandoned. Napoléon and
Hitler failed in their attempts. The late Enoch Powell alluded in the
Evening Standard (December 2, 1987) to a "profound
rearrangement now taking place" involving the "dissolution of the
North Atlantic Alliance versus Warsaw Pact confrontation" and
resulting in an arrangement which would "reappear like some submerged
landscape revealed when the floodwaters fall, an older pattern, which
previous generations would have no difficulty in recognising. [...]
Its old name is Holy Roman Empire." The comparison is strongly
reminiscent of the Biblical prophecy in Revelation 17:8 of a beast
ascending out of a bottomless pit.
more...
|
EU/UN/4th Kingdom | RCC
| NewWorldOrder |
End EU constitution stalemate:
Solana The
Peninsula
(May 18,
2007) -
European Union
foreign policy chief Javier Solana
urged the bloc yesterday to
resolve the two-year-old stalemate
over its stalled constitution,
arguing the deadlock was
undermining EU's influence in the
world. Receiving a prestigious
German peace prize in the border
city of Aachen, Solana
backed efforts by Chancellor
Angela Merkel to launch a
blueprint for reforms of EU
structures that would be in place
from mid-2009. "Just
when we should be at our most
alert, just when the world's
demand for Europe is at its
highest, the Union has turned
inwards, immersed in a sterile
institutional crisis," Solana
said. "We cannot go on like this.
This must be resolved as soon as
possible, if possible in 2007," he
told an audience packed with past
and present European dignitaries.
The bloc's 27 capitals disagree on
how to revive a charter all but
killed off in 2005 by rejections
in Dutch and French referendums.
Diplomats say some consensus is,
however, emerging around a
slimmed-down "mini treaty"
proposed by new French President
Nicolas Sarkozy. It is not clear
how much will be salvaged of the
original text, which would have
streamlined EU voting structures,
created a more permanent
presidency and a single foreign
minister. Spanish Socialist
Solana would have been the first
holder of such a post, giving him
control over EU instruments such
as its vast overseas aid budget.
Yet with his mandate expiring in
2009, any attempt to restore the
position come too late for him.
"We can only develop a genuine
foreign policy if we give
ourselves the necessary
structures," said the 64-year-old
former NATO secretary-general. "In
the last few years, we have come a
long way ... But today, we are
very close to the limit of what
can be achieved in this way."
Solana, who has mediated in
conflicts from the Balkans to the
Middle East, received the
Charlemagne Award.
|
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom | Solana
|
Charlemagne Award 2007: Dr. Javier
Solana Madariaga
pdf
(May
17, 2007) - "I was
privileged to be born into a
family with a long-standing
commitment to Europe. Naturally it
gives me great satisfaction to
note that, along with Salvador de
Madariaga, two members of this
family have now received this
eminent distinction. As a Spanish
European, allow me to say a few
words of gratitude to those
Spaniards present here who have
been awarded the distinction that
I now have the honour to receive.
It is not hard to put this into
words: by pooling our resources
and working together we can forge
a better and more promising future
than any of us could have hoped to
do alone. This is all the more
important in a world in which
forces and movements have been
unleashed which no single
government can control or contain.
A world in which violence,
oppression and extreme poverty are
still with us. A world in which
many do not share our commitment
to multilateralism and the rule of
law. I am convinced that we should
continue the European integration
process. In the past we have
relied on a three-pronged strategy
of enlarging, deepening and
reforming. Each of these elements
has depended on the others for
success, and even for meaning.
With enlargement we have reunified
Europe without imposing anything
on anyone, simply through the
enormous power of attraction that
the Union has had on other
European States. It has been a
historic success. But the Union is
a work in progress. That is why
I am convinced that we need
changes in various spheres.
Changes in what things we do and
how; changes in how we communicate
with our citizens and spend their
money; changes in how we deal with
the rest of the world. Above
all, we need to safeguard Europe's
capacity to act. Our world is
changing very rapidly. New players
are moving into the centres of
power and decision-making; major
economic flows are also shifting;
many schools of thought are
moving away from our humanist
model; and scientific and
technological know-how is
spreading to regions of the world
where, just a few years ago, it
would have been inconceivable to
encounter this type of knowledge.
In the face of those
far-reaching changes; in the face
of those challenges of
unpredictable scope, I regret to
have to observe that our Union is
reacting with paralysing
narrow-mindedness." Just
when we should be at our most
alert, just when the world's
demand for Europe is at its
highest, the Union has turned
inwards, immersed in a sterile
institutional crisis. We cannot go
on like this. This must be
resolved as soon as possible, in
2007. For this reason, I
unreservedly support Chancellor
Merkel in her efforts to put an
end to this hiatus and put Europe
back on a solid footing to face
the future. And we should do so
with determination because Europe
means not only grand ideas but
also concrete achievements. Of
these there have been many and of
great significance: the single
market, the euro, enlargement, the
development of capabilities to
conduct military and civilian
crisismanagement operations, to
name a few. But our citizens want
more than a market and a regional
stabilisation project. They
also want the Union to be a global
player. And they want it, by
acting globally, to be a factor
for peace. We are seen
as an active player but not as a
threat. For this we have
to thank the legacy of the ideas
on which we originally founded our
project: solid laws and
institutions, the tireless pursuit
of consensus and a spirit of
compromise... European
integration began with the desire
to consolidate peace between
Germany and France. Forty years
later, it has been the key to the
peaceful reunification of the
continent. In Europe, we have
managed to break away from the old
idea of basing our security on the
weakness of others. We have
transcended that approach, which
remains prevalent in many parts of
the world. Now we realise that our
strength and prosperity depend on
the strength and prosperity of our
neighbours. We have to go on to
take the next step and become a
factor for peace in the
international community. The
young people of Europe are
big-hearted. In vast numbers, they
act to alleviate the situation of
those who suffer the greatest
hardships. I have toured three
continents, visiting EU missions
in which European police officers,
soldiers, magistrates and young
people of all origins are working
for peace. What started out as a
European peace project must in the
21st century become a factor for
peace in the world. Our young
people will, without a doubt, back
such a project. Because it is
above all they who dream of a
world like that. Europe is a global
player speaking with one voice and
playing a decisive role in world
peace and stability. Europe is
an inescapable factor in resolving
any international conflict or
crisis. Europe, a point of
reference for a world based on
solid, respected laws and
institutions. That is my idea of
Europe. And I believe with all my
heart that this can and should be
the next achievement in the grand
European project. We have the
capability. Let us mobilise the
political will and make it happen.
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
Solana
| The beginning of the speech was
platitudes and flattery moving
into the strategy for the future.
A thought came to me while reading
it, more of a scripture verse:
2 Thessalonians 2:7-12,
"For
the mystery of iniquity doth
already work: only he who now
letteth will let, until he be
taken out of the way. And then
shall that Wicked be revealed,
whom the Lord shall consume with
the spirit of his mouth, and shall
destroy with the brightness of his
coming:
Even him, whose coming is after
the working of Satan with all
power and signs and lying wonders,
And with all deceivableness of
unrighteousness in them that
perish; because they received not
the love of the truth, that they
might be saved. And for this
cause God shall send them strong
delusion, that they should believe
a lie: That they all might be
damned who believed not the truth,
but had pleasure in
unrighteousness."
What is the lie? I think Solana
put it pretty well, the New World
Order. The underlined portions
above highlight the unity first in
Europe, but open-ended leading to
the world. The lie is that this is
all for the common good. Reality
is explained in the Bible, that
Lucifer is trying to deceive us
away from the Truth, which is
Christ. But most of the world
pleasures in unrighteousness and
couldn't care less about the
Bible. So they are deluded without
Truth and they believe the lie,
joining man's solution to the
violence in this world. In reality
Lucifer is behind both the
violence and man's solution to it,
both an effort to blind man to
spiritual reality by only
recognizing the material world.
Solana claims the solution to
peace through the laws of the
revived Roman Empire and
compromise and claims the European
Union is best suited for that
task.
Daniel 8:25,
"And
through his policy also he shall
cause craft to prosper in his
hand; and he shall magnify himself
in his heart, and by peace shall
destroy many: he shall also stand
up against the Prince of princes;
but he shall be broken without
hand."
Before you know it, RFID tagging
through a tattoo showing
allegiance to the system of world
government and its leader will be
implemented. Without that
identification, people will be
unable to buy or sell anything in
the global world. Doesn't seem far
off in this world of fear of
terrorism. That's not even taking
into account the effect of the
supernatural abilities that
Lucifer will give to the man of
sin. So what do we do? Pray. God
has already laid out what must
take place and told us to watch
and pray.
Europe-U.S. alliance shifts
(May
16, 2007)
- European politics are
suddenly moving forward at a
dizzying pace, making room for
tectonic changes in transatlantic
relations that will, in turn,
force Washington to reassess how
it looks at its European friends,
not-so-friends and foes.
In France after 12 years in the
French presidency, Jacques Chirac
is bowing out; Nicolas Sarkozy is
in. Mr. Sarkozy, 52, is the son of
a Hungarian immigrant who fled
communism. In Great Britain after
10 years as prime minister, Tony
Blair will soon be out when he
steps down in June. Gordon Brown
will be in. And in Berlin, Helmut
Kohl, a dinosaur of German
politics, has been gone for a
while, replaced by Angela Merkel.
Besides the obvious changes, it is
also important to point out major
political differences among
Western Europe's top leaders; Mr.
Chirac was seen as cold to the
United States, with whom he never
really managed to surmount the
strains caused by the Iraq war;
Mr. Sarkozy is outwardly warm to
Washington. Mr. Blair seemed to
follow Mr. Bush blindly, even into
the greatest Mesopotamian
misadventure; Mr. Brown is likely
to question, and then question
some more before committing to
accepting Mr. Bush's policies. And
in Berlin, Mr. Kohl, who together
with Mr. Chirac put up a united
front against Washington's
hegemony, was replaced by Gerhard
Schroeder. Then he was replaced by
Mrs. Merkel, who is far more open
to cooperating with Washington.
The irony brought about by these
changes is that the countries
labeled "old Europe" by former
U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald
Rumsfeld -- indicating that they
were practically irrelevant as
allies in the wars waged by the
United States -- are back firmly
in the U.S. corner. Meanwhile, the
United Kingdom, which, until
recently could be counted as
Washington's most trusted ally in
Europe -- thanks to Mr. Blair's
unfaltering support of George W.
Bush -- may adopt a different
policy after Mr. Blair's departure
from No. 10 Downing Street next
month. Mr. Blair was seen to be so
adamantly in agreement with Mr.
Bush that the British press took
to calling him "Bush's poodle."
In France, these changes at the
top have produced the unthinkable.
Who would have imagined just a few
months ago that a French leader,
no less one emerging from the
party that has inherited the
political legacy of Gen. Charles
de Gaulle, would emerge into the
open as being so pro-American?
Especially when it was de Gaulle
himself who initiated the
anti-American mood that prevails
in much of France's society to
this day. In a book just released by Nicolas
Sarkozy titled "Testimony: France
in the 21st Century" and no doubt
timed to coincide with his victory
in the May presidential elections,
the new French president does not
waste time letting the reader know
his strong pro-American feelings.
As for the opening chapter in his
book, Mr. Sarkozy writes that he
has "no intention of apologizing
for feeling an affinity with the
greatest democracy in the world."
Mr. Sarkozy goes on to say, "I
don't see why my country doesn't
take inspiration from its great
ally, rather than constantly
trying approaches that have failed
both in France and elsewhere." His
very American outlook on work
ethics will undoubtedly send
shivers down the spines of many of
his fellow citizens. As Mr.
Sarkozy says, "the French
socialists would have you believe
that work is a sort of punishment
from which people should try to
escape." more...
|
EU/UN
/
4th Kingdom
|
America
|
Understanding the Masonic history
of our nation and the view that it
was the New Atlantis, then seeing
how the mystery of iniquity has
been shaping world politics over
the years, I think this change is
very telling to the times. The
power struggle in Europe seems to
be playing right into the
globalist agenda and the grooming
of the population will definitely
be helped with the chaos of
radical Islam that is causing the
call for peace and security. Don't
think the politics can shift to
global control by one man in a
couple of years? Have you seen all
the government and technological
shifts happening in 2009/2010?
We've seen the kinds of changes
terrorism has caused to happen.
Convenient, yes?
You might be surprised just how
planned out it all has been.
Who do you think is behind the
scenes pulling all the strings? He
supplies the chaos that will cause
the world to give him their power
and eventually, worship. He will
supply the apparent peace-bringer
and subdue the chaos-bringers in
concert. The world will love him
for it and his pride will cause
his downfall when he gets his
power from Lucifer the dragon and
claims to be God in the Holy of
Holies.
Revelation 13
|
2 Thessalonians 2
Expect to see more trans-Atlantic
cooperation in the coming months
and years.
Merkel Gives Up On God In EU
Treaty (May
16, 2007) - German
chancellor and Christian
Democrat Angela Merkel has
voiced regret there will be no
reference to Christian roots in
the revised EU treaty, amid
controversial remarks about
damage to churches in Turkish
Cyprus at a meeting of religious
VIPs in Brussels. "You know what
my personal view is. I would
have liked the constitution to
deliver such a reference. But as
president of the European
Council, I see there is not much
of a chance," she said on the
prospects of God appearing in a
preamble to the EU text. "I
can't hold out any hope," she
added. Her statement comes in
the context of Germany's push to
fix the broad outlines of a new
EU treaty - still called a
"constitution" by some - in late
June, following months of
bilateral consultations with EU
states after the rejection of
the original EU constitution in
2005. The God debate is at least
as old as the 2002 EU convention
that wrote the original
constitution, with Roman
Catholic states like Poland and
the Vatican pushing for the
reference, but with France and
the UK worried over national
secularist traditions or
damaging relations with Islamic
EU candidate Turkey. The EU's
50th birthday declaration in
March rejuvenated the
discussion. But in the end the
birthday text made no reference
to Christianity, while praising
"identities and diverse
traditions of member states" and
how the EU is "enriched" by a
"variety of languages,
cultures."
more... |
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
This
shouldn't come as too big a
surprise given the direction I
believe Europe is heading,
giving their power to Mr.
Europe. It seems most are not a
big fan of the God of Abraham,
Isaac, and Jacob just like God
said it would be in the end
times. We offend people by
reminding them of the conscience
they've seared in unbelief and
rebellion. We all get a dose of
that in our lives, the
difference is how we respond to
it. Do we repent and ask God to
help us change, or do we ignore
it and do our own thing anyways?
Offense has given rise to
political correctness and that
has caused much of the problems
we have today. It will also be
America's downfall because Islam
is using that to infiltrate our
society and even do military
training within America's
borders! Meanwhile, Christians
are attacked while Islam
not-so-quietly plans America's
destruction from the inside. The
problem is the media won't
report it out of fear of offense
because Islam will scream and
yell the loudest if they feel
attacked. Keep in mind that
beheading is the execution
method of choice for those who
refuse to worship the
antichrist according to the
Bible in the
great tribulation.
Revelation 20:4,5
It just so happens that this is
how Islam deals with infidels.
Surah 47:4,
"When
ye encounter the infidels,
strike off their heads."
Where does a religion get its
ideals? From their holy book.
The problem with Christians is
that too many don't read their
book and instead live their
lives based on what they think
the Bible says. When Muslims
claim that their religion is one
of peace, they are either not
reading certain parts of their
Koran, or are taking advantage
of the ok given for Muslims to
lie to non-Muslims. Either way,
when they finally do openly
support what the Koran says, it
will certainly create an
environment of hostility toward
any non-Muslim. Think I'm just
making it up? Check some more
verses from the
Koran
and
Hadiths
out for
yourself. Religion of peace?
Maybe if they don't obey their
holy book. Listen to the reading
of
Islam's Dark Past
to see
just how disjointed their holy
book is. As for those who do,
listen to what they're saying
here
and
here.
Lest one considers this "hate
speech" against Islam, I remind
you that the source of this
information is the Koran and
history. As Christians what did
Christ tell us to do in our holy
Book? Love God and our neighbors
and we are told to turn the
other cheek and even love our
enemies. Our God died so we
could live, Islam is encouraging
its followers to die so they can
kill Jews and Christians.
Religion of life or religion of
death. Without God there is only
death, and so as God is removed
more and more from government,
so too is life removed and we
will continue to watch our
nation among the rest decay from
greed, corruption, and lies. Our
only hope is in Yeshua the
Christ who is coming soon to
gather those who love Him and
obey His Word. The choice is
always ours to make daily.
Something to make you think (May
15, 2007) - I
believe most of you are familiar
with this verse:
Daniel 9:27,
"And he shall make a firm
covenant with many for one week:
and in the midst of the week he
shall cause the sacrifice and
the oblation to cease; and upon
the wing of abominations shall
come one that maketh desolate;
and even unto the full end, and
that determined, shall wrath be
poured out upon the desolate."
I am going to go outside the
view of most prophecy scholars
and bring you some views that I
want you to study to see if it
is so. The popular view is that
the Antichrist will break his
seven year peace covenant with
Israel after 42 months. But the
verse says that he will
cause sacrifice and the oblation
to cease. When Antichrist
walks into the Temple, it will
not be to break a covenant, but
to stop the animal sacrifices by
the priests. Regular
readers will know that I lean to
the view that the seven year ENP
might be the
fulfillment of this prophecy. We
can not be totally sure of it,
but the signs are there. I have
done some layman studying of the
ENP and found that there are
action plans written into it to
protect animal rights. It must
be fully implemented by 2010,
halfway trough the ENP seven
year period. Israel was one of
the first to sign the ENP.
Israel wants to have a Temple to
resume daily sacrifice.
Sacrificing of animals is
against the action plans of the
ENP. By sacrificing of animals,
Israel will violate the ENP, and
that can cause the Antichrist to
walk into the Temple and stop
the sacrificing. Here are some
snippets from the
official animal welfare document:
OBJECTIVES The primary objectives that
the Commission wishes to
achieve with the elaboration
of this Action Plan are to: Define more clearly the
direction of Community
policies on animal protection
and welfare for the coming
years; Continue to promote high
animal welfare standards in
the EU and at the
international level; Provide greater coordination
of existing resources while
identifying future needs; Support future trends in
animal welfare research and
continue to support the 3Rs
principle: Replacement,
Reduction and Refinement
alternative approaches to
animal testing; Ensure a more consistent and
coordinated approach to animal
protection and welfare across
Commission policy areas, also
taking into account aspects
such as the socio-economic
impact of any new measures.
These cannot be considered as
stand-alone actions; there are
clear linkages between the
actions foreseen necessitating
a coordinated and holistic
approach. A period from
2006 to 2010
is considered appropriate in
order to advance the actions
proposed, with associated
regular monitoring and
evaluation of progress as well
as follow-up programming
beyond 2010 following the
completion of this first
Community Action Plan.
BUDGETARY CONSIDERATIONS The preparation of an Action
Plan per se has no implication
for the Community budget. The
potential budgetary
implications of each
individual action will be
taken into account in the
impact assessments to be
prepared for each respective
action, within the framework
set for the expenditure on
veterinary and phytosanitary
measures for the period
2007-2013
where relevant.
These are just snippets of the 9
page document. If you can read
the whole document, please do
so. The foundation for the
fulfillment of Daniels prophecy
might already be in place. Only
time will tell if it is so.
Maybe this will blow over and
lead to nothing, or we might see
it happen in just over three
years time. We still need a
Temple and there are not much
time left for it to be build,
but if we are seeing the
unfolding of this prophecy, we
will not wait to long. |
Israel
|
EU/UN /
4th Kingdom |
|